Issuer Delisting; Notice of Application of Dana Corporation, To Withdraw Its Common Stock, $1.00 Par Value, From Listing and Registration on the Pacific Exchange, Inc., 8316-8317 [E6-2216]
Download as PDF
dsatterwhite on PROD1PC65 with NOTICES
8316
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 32 / Thursday, February 16, 2006 / Notices
the licensee’s projected dose for the
burial of carbon-14 is conservative
based on the volume of the animal
containing the carbon-14 from the
study, which was noted as being a
‘‘coffee can’’ size (which is variable.)
The NRC staff performed a dose
modeling evaluation based on a buried
volume of 500 grams and using the
default parameters in RESRAD, Version
6.22. The model projected a peak dose
of 14 mrem to occur in 1965, with a
sharp decline to less than 1 mrem in
1971. In either scenario, the calculated
value beyond year seven (1968) is below
the current 25 millirem limit for
unrestricted use of the site as stipulated
in 10 CFR 20.1402.
The NRC staff considered the
potential impacts of leaching of
radioactive material into the shallow
groundwater due to the burial of carbon14 in 1961. In 1965, the shallow surface
groundwater on the Carroll College
campus was not used as a drinking
water source. Additionally, local
members of the public obtained their
drinking water from the city, whose
source was several miles away. There
were only two wells identified on the
Montana Bureau of Mines and Geology
Web site which were installed prior to
1965. The impact of potentially
contaminated groundwater was
considered as part of the RESRAD dose
modeling evaluation and the primary
pathway of concern was the direct
consumption of water by the resident
farmer scenario. Based on the
evaluations, there was no impact to
groundwater as a result of the one-time
burial of carbon-14. The areas of the site
where radioactive material had been
stored and handled were surveyed on
April 9, 2005, by the radiation safety
officer from Montana State University.
The surveys were performed using
Ludlum survey meter with a GM probe
and a low energy gamma (NaI) probe. In
addition, survey wipes were taken and
analyzed on a Packard Liquid
Scintillation Counter. The results were
less than twice background and
adequately meet the criteria for
unrestricted use.
The NRC has the option, depending
on the licensee’s survey and extent of
radioactive material that was used at the
facility, to perform a close out
inspection of the facility. Based on the
low-energy beta emitting radioisotopes
and the length of time since the last use
of radioactive material at the facility, the
NRC staff determined that a close-out
inspection of the facility was not
justified. The licensee’s independent
survey was sufficient to demonstrate
that the facility was suitable for
unrestricted use in accordance with 10
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:56 Feb 15, 2006
Jkt 208001
CFR Part 20. The environmental impacts
resulting from the release of this site for
unrestricted use are insignificant. There
were no additional activities that
resulted in cumulative impacts to the
environment.
III. Finding of No Significant Impact
The NRC staff concludes that the
proposed action complies with the
radiological criteria for unrestricted use
as stipulated in 10 CFR 20.1402. The
licensee demonstrated that any
remaining residual radioactivity will not
result in radiological exposures in
excess of the 25 millirem total effective
dose equivalent limit specified in
§ 20.1402. Dose modeling indicates that
current and future members of the
public will not receive any radiological
dose from the burial site. The NRC staff
prepared an Environmental Assessment
(EA) in support of the requested license
amendment. On the basis of this EA, the
NRC has concluded that there are no
significant environmental impacts and
the license amendment does not warrant
the preparation of an Environmental
Impact Statement. Accordingly, it has
been determined that a Finding of No
Significant Impact (FONSI) is
appropriate.
IV. Further Information
Documents related to this action,
including the application for
amendment and supporting
documentation, are available
electronically at the NRC’s Electronic
Reading Room at https://www.nrc.gov/
reading-rm/adams.html. From this site,
you may access the NRC’s Agencywide
Document Access and Management
System (ADAMS), which provides text
and image files of NRC’s public
documents. The ADAMS accession
numbers for the documents related to
this notice are: Carroll College letter and
NRC Form 314, dated October 10, 2005,
(ML053040347); Carroll College letter
dose modeling submittal, dated January
17, 2005 (ML050540533); NRC
Environmental Assessment
(ML060170746). If you do not have
access to ADAMS or if there are
problems in accessing the documents
located in ADAMS, contact the NRC
Public Document Room (PDR) Reference
staff at 1–800–397–4209, 301–415–4737,
or by e-mail to pdr@nrc.gov.
These documents may also be viewed
electronically on the public computers
located at the NRC’s PDR, O 1 F21, One
White Flint North, 11555 Rockville
Pike, Rockville, MD 20852. The PDR
reproduction contractor will copy
documents for a fee.
Dated at Arlington, Texas this 8th day of
February 2006.
PO 00000
Frm 00046
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
For the Nuclear Regulatory Commission.
Jack E. Whitten,
Chief, Nuclear Materials Licensing Branch,
Division of Nuclear Materials Safety, Region
IV.
[FR Doc. E6–2214 Filed 2–15–06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7590–01–P
POSTAL SERVICE
Sunshine Act Meeting; Notification of
Item Added to Meeting Agenda
DATE OF MEETING:
STATUS:
February 7, 2006.
Closed.
PREVIOUS ANNOUNCEMENT: 71 FR 5384,
February 1, 2006.
ADDITION: Proposal to File Request for
Postal Rate Commission Advisory
Opinion on Service Changes.
At its closed meeting on February 7,
2006, the Board of Governors of the
United States Postal Service voted
unanimously to add this item to the
agenda of its closed meeting and that no
earlier announcement was possible. The
General Counsel of the United States
Postal Service certified that in her
opinion discussion of this item could be
properly closed to public observation.
CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION:
Wendy A. Hocking, Secretary of the
Board, U.S. Postal Service, 475 L’Enfant
Plaza, SW., Washington, DC 20260–
1000.
Wendy A. Hocking,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 06–1530 Filed 2–14–06; 3:25 pm]
BILLING CODE 7710–12–M
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
COMMISSION
[File No. 1–01063]
Issuer Delisting; Notice of Application
of Dana Corporation, To Withdraw Its
Common Stock, $1.00 Par Value, From
Listing and Registration on the Pacific
Exchange, Inc.
February 10, 2006.
On January 30, 2006, Dana
Corporation, a Virginia corporation
(‘‘Issuer’’), filed an application with the
Securities and Exchange Commission
(‘‘Commission’’), pursuant to Section
12(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934 (‘‘Act’’) 1 and Rule 12d2–2(d)
thereunder,2 to withdraw its common
stock, $1.00 par value (‘‘Security’’), from
1 15
2 17
E:\FR\FM\16FEN1.SGM
U.S.C. 78l(d).
CFR 240.12d2–2(d).
16FEN1
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 32 / Thursday, February 16, 2006 / Notices
listing and registration on the Pacific
Exchange, Inc. (‘‘PCX’’).
The Board of Directors (‘‘Board’’) of
the Issuer approved resolutions on
December 1, 2005 to withdraw the
Security from PCX. The Issuer stated
that the Board determined that delisting
the Security from PCX is in the Issuer’s
best interest because delisting the
Security will have no impact on the
trading volume of the Security, given
the low volume of trading on PCX, and
the costs of complying with the
regulatory and administrative
requirements associated with PCX
listing are no longer justified. The Issuer
stated that the Security is listed on the
New York Stock Exchange, Inc.
(‘‘NYSE’’) and the Issuer will continue
to comply with the rules and regulations
of NYSE.
The Issuer stated in its application
that it has complied with applicable
rules of PCX by providing PCX with the
required documents governing the
withdrawal of securities from listing
and registration on PCX. The Issuer’s
application relates solely to the
withdrawal of the Security from listing
on PCX and shall not affect its
continued listing on NYSE or its
obligation to be registered under Section
12(b) of the Act.3
Any interested person may, on or
before March 9, 2006, comment on the
facts bearing upon whether the
application has been made in
accordance with the rules of PCX, and
what terms, if any, should be imposed
by the Commission for the protection of
investors. All comment letters may be
submitted by either of the following
methods:
Electronic Comments
• Send an e-mail to rulecomments@sec.gov. Please include the
File Number 1–01063 or;
dsatterwhite on PROD1PC65 with NOTICES
Paper Comments
• Send paper comments in triplicate
to Nancy M. Morris, Secretary,
Securities and Exchange Commission,
100 F Street, NE., Washington, DC
20549–1090.
All submissions should refer to File
Number 1–01063. This file number
should be included on the subject line
if e-mail is used. To help us process and
review your comments more efficiently,
please use only one method. The
Commission will post all comments on
the Commission’s Internet Web site
(https://www.sec.gov/rules/delist.shtml).
Comments are also available for public
inspection and copying in the
Commission’s Public Reference Room.
All comments received will be posted
without change; we do not edit personal
identifying information from
submissions. You should submit only
information that you wish to make
available publicly.
The Commission, based on the
information submitted to it, will issue
an order granting the application after
the date mentioned above, unless the
Commission determines to order a
hearing on the matter.
For the Commission, by the Division of
Market Regulation, pursuant to delegated
authority.4
Nancy M. Morris,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. E6–2216 Filed 2–15–06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8010–01–P
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
COMMISSION
[File No. 1–08962]
Issuer Delisting; Notice of Application
of Pinnacle West Capital Corporation
To Withdraw Its Common Stock, No
Par Value, From Listing and
Registration on the Pacific Exchange,
Inc.
February 10, 2006.
On January 27, 2006, Pinnacle West
Capital Corporation, an Arizona
corporation (‘‘Issuer’’), filed an
application with the Securities and
Exchange Commission (‘‘Commission’’),
pursuant to Section 12(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(‘‘Act’’) 1 and Rule 12d2–2(d)
thereunder,2 to withdraw its common
stock, no par value (‘‘Security’’), from
listing and registration on the Pacific
Exchange, Inc. (‘‘PCX’’).
The Board of Directors (‘‘Board’’) of
the Issuer approved resolutions on
December 14, 2005 to withdraw the
Security from PCX. The Issuer stated
that the Board considered the following
factors in making the decision to
withdraw the Security from PCX: (i)
Listing the Security on PCX is no longer
in the Issuer best interests because the
Issuer is subject to dual regulation by
PCX and the New York Stock Exchange,
Inc. (‘‘NYSE’’); (ii) the benefits
4 17
CFR 200.30–3(a)(1).
U.S.C. 78l(d).
2 17 CFR 240.12d2–2(d).
associated with listing on PCX do not
outweigh the costs and additional
regulatory obligations, and no longer
favor continued listing on PCX; and (iii)
the Security is listed on the NYSE and
will continue to list on NYSE.
The Issuer stated in its application
that it has complied with applicable
rules of PCX by complying with all
applicable laws in the State of Arizona,
the state in which the Issuer is
incorporated, and by providing PCX
with the required documents governing
the withdrawal of securities from listing
and registration on PCX. The Issuer’s
application relates solely to the
withdrawal of the Security from listing
on PCX and shall not affect its
continued listing on NYSE or its
obligation to be registered under Section
12(b) of the Act.3
Any interested person may, on or
before March 9, 2006, comment on the
facts bearing upon whether the
application has been made in
accordance with the rules of PCX, and
what terms, if any, should be imposed
by the Commission for the protection of
investors. All comment letters may be
submitted by either of the following
methods:
Electronic Comments
• Send an e-mail to rulecomments@sec.gov. Please include the
File Number 1–08962
or;
Paper Comments
• Send paper comments in triplicate
to Nancy M. Morris, Secretary,
Securities and Exchange Commission,
100 F Street, NE., Washington, DC
20549–1090.
All submissions should refer to File
Number 1–08962. This file number
should be included on the subject line
if e-mail is used. To help us process and
review your comments more efficiently,
please use only one method. The
Commission will post all comments on
the Commission’s Internet Web site
(https://www.sec.gov/rules/delist.shtml).
Comments are also available for public
inspection and copying in the
Commission’s Public Reference Room.
All comments received will be posted
without change; we do not edit personal
identifying information from
submissions. You should submit only
information that you wish to make
available publicly.
1 15
3 15
U.S.C. 78l(b).
VerDate Aug<31>2005
17:48 Feb 15, 2006
Jkt 208001
PO 00000
Frm 00047
Fmt 4703
3 15
Sfmt 4703
8317
E:\FR\FM\16FEN1.SGM
U.S.C. 78l(b).
16FEN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 71, Number 32 (Thursday, February 16, 2006)]
[Notices]
[Pages 8316-8317]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E6-2216]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
[File No. 1-01063]
Issuer Delisting; Notice of Application of Dana Corporation, To
Withdraw Its Common Stock, $1.00 Par Value, From Listing and
Registration on the Pacific Exchange, Inc.
February 10, 2006.
On January 30, 2006, Dana Corporation, a Virginia corporation
(``Issuer''), filed an application with the Securities and Exchange
Commission (``Commission''), pursuant to Section 12(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (``Act'') \1\ and Rule 12d2-2(d)
thereunder,\2\ to withdraw its common stock, $1.00 par value
(``Security''), from
[[Page 8317]]
listing and registration on the Pacific Exchange, Inc. (``PCX'').
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ 15 U.S.C. 78l(d).
\2\ 17 CFR 240.12d2-2(d).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Board of Directors (``Board'') of the Issuer approved
resolutions on December 1, 2005 to withdraw the Security from PCX. The
Issuer stated that the Board determined that delisting the Security
from PCX is in the Issuer's best interest because delisting the
Security will have no impact on the trading volume of the Security,
given the low volume of trading on PCX, and the costs of complying with
the regulatory and administrative requirements associated with PCX
listing are no longer justified. The Issuer stated that the Security is
listed on the New York Stock Exchange, Inc. (``NYSE'') and the Issuer
will continue to comply with the rules and regulations of NYSE.
The Issuer stated in its application that it has complied with
applicable rules of PCX by providing PCX with the required documents
governing the withdrawal of securities from listing and registration on
PCX. The Issuer's application relates solely to the withdrawal of the
Security from listing on PCX and shall not affect its continued listing
on NYSE or its obligation to be registered under Section 12(b) of the
Act.\3\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\3\ 15 U.S.C. 78l(b).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Any interested person may, on or before March 9, 2006, comment on
the facts bearing upon whether the application has been made in
accordance with the rules of PCX, and what terms, if any, should be
imposed by the Commission for the protection of investors. All comment
letters may be submitted by either of the following methods:
Electronic Comments
Send an e-mail to rule-comments@sec.gov. Please include
the File Number 1-01063 or;
Paper Comments
Send paper comments in triplicate to Nancy M. Morris,
Secretary, Securities and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street, NE.,
Washington, DC 20549-1090.
All submissions should refer to File Number 1-01063. This file number
should be included on the subject line if e-mail is used. To help us
process and review your comments more efficiently, please use only one
method. The Commission will post all comments on the Commission's
Internet Web site (https://www.sec.gov/rules/delist.shtml). Comments are
also available for public inspection and copying in the Commission's
Public Reference Room. All comments received will be posted without
change; we do not edit personal identifying information from
submissions. You should submit only information that you wish to make
available publicly.
The Commission, based on the information submitted to it, will
issue an order granting the application after the date mentioned above,
unless the Commission determines to order a hearing on the matter.
For the Commission, by the Division of Market Regulation,
pursuant to delegated authority.\4\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\4\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(1).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Nancy M. Morris,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. E6-2216 Filed 2-15-06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8010-01-P