In the Matter of Certain Incremental Dental Positioning Adjustment Appliances and Methods of Producing Same; Notice of Investigation, 7995-7996 [E6-2164]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 31 / Wednesday, February 15, 2006 / Notices
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Bureau of Land Management
National Indian Gaming Commission
[WO–310–06–1310–EPAI]
Fee Rates
Implementation of the Split Estate
Section 1835 of the Energy Policy Act
of 2005; Listening Sessions
AGENCY:
AGENCY:
Bureau of Land Management,
Interior.
Notice of public listening
sessions.
ACTION:
Listening sessions will be
held by the Bureau of Land Management
to solicit suggestions from the public on
how best to implement the split estate
provisions of the Energy Policy Act of
2005. Section 1835 of the Energy Policy
Act directs the Secretary of the Interior
to review current policies and practices
for managing oil and gas resources in
split estate situations, that is, how the
BLM provides for oil and gas
development and environmental
protection where the surface estate is
privately owned and the mineral estate
is owned and administered by the
Federal Government. The Act directs
that this review be conducted in
consultation with affected private
surface owners, oil and gas industry,
and other interested parties.
Dates and Locations: Listening
Sessions will be scheduled during late
March 2006 in Colorado, Montana, New
Mexico, Wyoming, and Washington, DC.
The BLM will announce exact times and
locations through the local media, email, and on the Split Estate Web site
at: https://www.blm.gov/bmp at least 15
days prior to the listening sessions.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jim
Perry, Senior Natural Resource
Specialist for the BLM Fluid Minerals
Program at (202) 452–5063, or visit the
Split Estate Web site at https://
www.blm.gov/bmp.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The
listening sessions will begin with an
overview of the split estate provisions of
the Energy Policy Act and current split
estate practices, policies, regulations,
and laws that guide management of the
Federal mineral estate. Participants who
request to speak will be provided a set
amount of time to provide
recommendations for managing oil and
gas resources in split estate situations.
cprice-sewell on PROD1PC66 with NOTICES
SUMMARY:
National Indian Gaming
Commission, Interior.
ACTION:
Notice.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Bobby Gordon, National Indian Gaming
Commission, 1441 L Street, NW., Suite
9100, Washington, DC 20005; telephone
202/632–7003; fax 202/632–7066 (these
are not toll-free numbers).
The
Indian Gaming Regulatory Act
established the National Indian Gaming
Commission whish is charged with,
among other things, regulating gaming
on Indian lands.
The regulations of the Commission
(25 CFR part 514), as amended, provide
for a system of fee assessment and
payment that is self-administered by
gaming operations. Pursuant to those
regulations, the Commission is required
to adopt and communicate assessment
rates; the gaming operations are
required to apply those rates to their
revenues, compute the fees to be paid,
report the revenues, and remit the fees
to the Commission on a quarterly basis.
The regulations of the Commission
and the preliminary rate being adopted
today are effective for calendar year
2006. Therefore, all gaming operations
within the jurisdiction of the
Commission are required to selfadminister the provisions of these
regulations and report and pay any fees
that are due to the Commission by
March 31, 2006.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Irene Schrader,
Director of Administration, National Indian
Gaming Commission.
[FR Doc. 06–1403 Filed 2–14–06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310–84–P
BILLING CODE 7565–01–M
16:15 Feb 14, 2006
Jkt 208001
PO 00000
Frm 00084
Fmt 4703
INTERNATIONAL TRADE
COMMISSION
[Inv. No. 337–TA–562]
In the Matter of Certain Incremental
Dental Positioning Adjustment
Appliances and Methods of Producing
Same; Notice of Investigation
U.S. International Trade
Commission.
ACTION: Institution of investigation
pursuant to 19 U.S.C. 1337.
AGENCY:
Notice is hereby given,
pursuant to 25 CFR 514.1(a)(3), that the
National Indian Gaming Commission
has adopted preliminary annual fee
rates of 0.00% for tier 1 and 0.053%
(.00053) for tier 2 for calendar year
2006. These rates shall apply to all
assessable gross revenues from each
gaming operation under the jurisdiction
of the Commission. If a tribe has a
certificate of self-regulation under 25
CFR part 518, the preliminary fee rate
on class II revenues for calendar year
2006 shall be one-half of the annual fee
rate, which is 0.0265% (.000265).
SUMMARY:
Dated: February 7, 2006.
Thomas P. Lonnie,
Assistant Director, Minerals, Realty and
Resource Protection.
[FR Doc. E6–2092 Filed 2–14–06; 8:45 am]
VerDate Aug<31>2005
7995
Sfmt 4703
SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that a
complaint was filed with the U.S.
International Trade Commission on
January 11, 2006, under section 337 of
the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, 19
U.S.C. 1337, on behalf of Align
Technology, Inc. The complaint alleges
violations of section 337 in the
importation into the United States, the
sale for importation, and the sale within
the United States after importation of
certain incremental dental positioning
adjustment appliances by reason of
infringement of claims 1–36, 38, 42–49,
and 51–58 of U.S. Patent No. 6,685,469;
claim 1 of U.S. Patent No. 6,450,807;
claims 1–4 of U.S. Patent No. 6,394,801;
claims 21, 22, 24–30, 32–36, 38, and 39
of U.S. Patent No. 6,398,548; claims 1,
2, 4–8, 10, and 12–18 of U.S. Patent No.
6,722,880; claims 1–3, 6–8, and 11 of
U.S. Patent No. 6,629,840; claims 1, 2,
9, and 10 of U.S. Patent No. 6,699,037;
claims 1–18, 20–23, 25, 26, and 29–38
of U.S. Patent No. 6,318,994; claims 1–
22 and 28 of U.S. Patent No. 6,729,876;
claims 34–56 and 59–65 of U.S. Patent
No. 6,602,070; claims 1–6, 9, and 10 of
U.S. Patent No. 6,471,511; and claims 1–
13, 15, 16, and 18 of U.S. Patent No.
6,227,850; and also by reason of
misappropriation of trade secrets, the
threat or effect of which is to destroy or
substantially injure an industry in the
United States. The complaint further
alleges that an industry in the United
States exists as required by subsection
(a)(2) of section 337.
The complainant requests that the
Commission institute an investigation
and, after the investigation, issue a
permanent exclusion order and
permanent cease and desist orders.
ADDRESSES: The complaint, except for
any confidential information contained
therein, is available for inspection
during official business hours (8:45 a.m.
to 5:15 p.m.) in the Office of the
Secretary, U.S. International Trade
Commission, 500 E Street, SW., Room
112, Washington, DC 20436, telephone
202–205–2000. Hearing impaired
individuals are advised that information
on this matter can be obtained by
E:\FR\FM\15FEN1.SGM
15FEN1
7996
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 31 / Wednesday, February 15, 2006 / Notices
contacting the Commission’s TDD
terminal on 202–205–1810. Persons
with mobility impairments who will
need special assistance in gaining access
to the Commission should contact the
Office of the Secretary at 202–205–2000.
General information concerning the
Commission may also be obtained by
accessing its Internet server at https://
www.usitc.gov. The public record for
this investigation may be viewed on the
Commission’s electronic docket (EDIS)
at https://edis.usitc.gov.
Jay
H. Reiziss, Esq., Office of Unfair Import
Investigations, U.S. International Trade
Commission, telephone 202–205–2579.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Authority: The authority for institution of
this investigation is contained in section 337
of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, and
in section 210.10 of the Commission’s Rules
of Practice and Procedure, 19 CFR 210.10
(2005).
cprice-sewell on PROD1PC66 with NOTICES
Scope of Investigation: Having
considered the complaint, the U.S.
International Trade Commission, on
February 7, 2006, Ordered That—
(1) Pursuant to subsection (b) of section
337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, an
investigation be instituted to determine:
(a) Whether there is a violation of
subsection (a)(1)(B) of section 337 in the
importation into the United States, the sale
for importation, or the sale within the United
States after importation of certain
incremental dental positioning adjustment
appliances by reason of infringement of one
or more of claims 1–36, 38, 42–49, and 51–
58 of U.S. Patent No. 6,685,469; claim 1 of
U.S. Patent No. 6,450,807; claims 1–4 of U.S.
Patent No. 6,394,801; claims 21, 22, 24–30,
32–36, 38, and 39 of U.S. Patent No.
6,398,548; claims 1, 2, 4–8, 10, and 12–18 of
U.S. Patent No. 6,722,880; claims 1–3, 6–8,
and 11 of U.S. Patent No. 6,629,840; claims
1, 2, 9, and 10 of U.S. Patent No. 6,699,037;
claims 1–18, 20–23, 25, 26, and 29–38 of U.S.
Patent No. 6,318,994; claims 1–22 and 28 of
U.S. Patent No. 6,729,876; claims 34–56 and
59–65 of U.S. Patent No. 6,602,070; claims 1–
6, 9, and 10 of U.S. Patent No. 6,471,511; and
claims 1–13, 15, 16, and 18 of U.S. Patent No.
6,227,850, and whether an industry in the
United States exists as required by subsection
(a)(2) of section 337; or
(b) Whether there is a violation of
subsection (a)(1)(A) of section 337 in the
importation into the United States of certain
incremental dental positioning adjustment
appliances or in the sale of such articles by
reason of misappropriation of trade secrets,
the threat or effect of which is to destroy or
substantially injure an industry in the United
States.
(2) For the purpose of the investigation so
instituted, the following are hereby named as
parties upon which this notice of
investigation shall be served:
(a) The complainant is—Align Technology,
Inc., 881 Martin Avenue, Santa Clara,
California 95050.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
13:17 Feb 14, 2006
Jkt 208001
(b) The respondents are the following
entities alleged to be in violation of section
337, and are the parties upon which the
complaint is to be served:
OrthoClear, Inc., 580 California St., Suite
1725, San Francisco, CA 94104
OrthoClear Holdings, Inc., c/o Walkers (BV)
Limited, Walkers Chambers, P.O. Box 92,
Tortola, British Virgin Islands
OrthoClear Pakistan Pvt, Ltd., 8-Aitchison
Rd., 1-km Thoker, Niaz Baig, Raiwind Rd.,
Lahore, Pakistan
(c) Jay H. Reiziss, Esq., Office of Unfair
Import Investigations, U.S. International
Trade Commission, 500 E Street, SW., Suite
401, Washington, DC 20436, who shall be the
Commission investigative attorney, party to
this investigation; and
(3) For the investigation so instituted, the
Honorable Robert L. Barton, Jr. is designated
as the presiding administrative law judge.
Responses to the complaint and the
notice of investigation must be
submitted by the named respondents in
accordance with section 210.13 of the
Commission’s Rules of Practice and
Procedure, 19 CFR 210.13. Pursuant to
19 CFR 201.16(d) and 210.13(a), such
responses will be considered by the
Commission if received not later than 20
days after the date of service by the
Commission of the complaint and the
notice of investigation. Extensions of
time for submitting responses to the
complaint and the notice of
investigation will not be granted unless
good cause therefor is shown.
Failure of a respondent to file a timely
response to each allegation in the
complaint and in this notice may be
deemed to constitute a waiver of the
right to appear and contest the
allegations of the complaint and this
notice, and to authorize the
administrative law judge and the
Commission, without further notice to
the respondents, to find the facts to be
as alleged in the complaint and this
notice and to enter a final determination
containing such findings, and may
result in the issuance of a limited
exclusion order or cease and desist
order or both directed against the
respondent.
By order of the Commission.
Issued: February 9, 2006.
Marilyn R. Abbott,
Secretary to the Commission.
[FR Doc. E6–2164 Filed 2–14–06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7020–02–P
PO 00000
Frm 00085
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
INTERNATIONAL TRADE
COMMISSION
[Investigation No. 337–TA–549]
In the Matter of Certain Ink Sticks for
Solid Ink Printers; Notice of Request
for Written Submissions on Remedy,
the Public Interest, and Bonding With
Respect to the Respondents Found in
Default
U.S. International Trade
Commission.
ACTION: Notice.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that
the U.S. International Trade
Commission is requesting briefing on
remedy, the public interest, and
bonding with respect to two
respondents previously found in
default.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Michelle Walters, Esq., Office of the
General Counsel, U.S. International
Trade Commission, 500 E Street, SW.,
Washington, DC 20436, telephone (202)
708–5468. Copies of non-confidential
documents filed in connection with this
investigation are or will be available for
inspection during official business
hours (8:45 a.m. to 5:15 p.m.) in the
Office of the Secretary, U.S.
International Trade Commission, 500 E
Street, SW., Washington, DC 20436,
telephone (202) 205–2000. General
information concerning the Commission
may also be obtained by accessing its
Internet server at https://www.usitc.gov.
The public record for this investigation
may be viewed on the Commission’s
electronic docket (EDIS) at https://
edis.usitc.gov. Hearing-impaired
persons are advised that information on
this matter can be obtained by
contacting the Commission’s TDD
terminal on (202) 205–1810.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The
Commission instituted this investigation
by notice on September 6, 2005, based
on a complaint filed by Xerox
Corporation (‘‘Xerox’’) of Stamford,
Connecticut. The complaint, as
amended, alleges violations of section
337 of the Tariff Act of 1930 (19 U.S.C.
1337) in the importation into the United
States, the sale for importation, and the
sale within the United States after
importation of certain ink sticks used in
solid ink printers by reason of
infringement of claim 16 of United
States Patent No. 6,739,713, claims 5–10
and 13–14 of United States Patent No.
6,840,613, and claims 1–2 of United
States Patent No. 6,840,612. The
complaint further alleges the existence
of a domestic industry. The
Commission’s notice of investigation
E:\FR\FM\15FEN1.SGM
15FEN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 71, Number 31 (Wednesday, February 15, 2006)]
[Notices]
[Pages 7995-7996]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E6-2164]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION
[Inv. No. 337-TA-562]
In the Matter of Certain Incremental Dental Positioning
Adjustment Appliances and Methods of Producing Same; Notice of
Investigation
AGENCY: U.S. International Trade Commission.
ACTION: Institution of investigation pursuant to 19 U.S.C. 1337.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that a complaint was filed with the
U.S. International Trade Commission on January 11, 2006, under section
337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, 19 U.S.C. 1337, on behalf of
Align Technology, Inc. The complaint alleges violations of section 337
in the importation into the United States, the sale for importation,
and the sale within the United States after importation of certain
incremental dental positioning adjustment appliances by reason of
infringement of claims 1-36, 38, 42-49, and 51-58 of U.S. Patent No.
6,685,469; claim 1 of U.S. Patent No. 6,450,807; claims 1-4 of U.S.
Patent No. 6,394,801; claims 21, 22, 24-30, 32-36, 38, and 39 of U.S.
Patent No. 6,398,548; claims 1, 2, 4-8, 10, and 12-18 of U.S. Patent
No. 6,722,880; claims 1-3, 6-8, and 11 of U.S. Patent No. 6,629,840;
claims 1, 2, 9, and 10 of U.S. Patent No. 6,699,037; claims 1-18, 20-
23, 25, 26, and 29-38 of U.S. Patent No. 6,318,994; claims 1-22 and 28
of U.S. Patent No. 6,729,876; claims 34-56 and 59-65 of U.S. Patent No.
6,602,070; claims 1-6, 9, and 10 of U.S. Patent No. 6,471,511; and
claims 1-13, 15, 16, and 18 of U.S. Patent No. 6,227,850; and also by
reason of misappropriation of trade secrets, the threat or effect of
which is to destroy or substantially injure an industry in the United
States. The complaint further alleges that an industry in the United
States exists as required by subsection (a)(2) of section 337.
The complainant requests that the Commission institute an
investigation and, after the investigation, issue a permanent exclusion
order and permanent cease and desist orders.
ADDRESSES: The complaint, except for any confidential information
contained therein, is available for inspection during official business
hours (8:45 a.m. to 5:15 p.m.) in the Office of the Secretary, U.S.
International Trade Commission, 500 E Street, SW., Room 112,
Washington, DC 20436, telephone 202-205-2000. Hearing impaired
individuals are advised that information on this matter can be obtained
by
[[Page 7996]]
contacting the Commission's TDD terminal on 202-205-1810. Persons with
mobility impairments who will need special assistance in gaining access
to the Commission should contact the Office of the Secretary at 202-
205-2000. General information concerning the Commission may also be
obtained by accessing its Internet server at https://www.usitc.gov. The
public record for this investigation may be viewed on the Commission's
electronic docket (EDIS) at https://edis.usitc.gov.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jay H. Reiziss, Esq., Office of Unfair
Import Investigations, U.S. International Trade Commission, telephone
202-205-2579.
Authority: The authority for institution of this investigation
is contained in section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended,
and in section 210.10 of the Commission's Rules of Practice and
Procedure, 19 CFR 210.10 (2005).
Scope of Investigation: Having considered the complaint, the U.S.
International Trade Commission, on February 7, 2006, Ordered That--
(1) Pursuant to subsection (b) of section 337 of the Tariff Act
of 1930, as amended, an investigation be instituted to determine:
(a) Whether there is a violation of subsection (a)(1)(B) of
section 337 in the importation into the United States, the sale for
importation, or the sale within the United States after importation
of certain incremental dental positioning adjustment appliances by
reason of infringement of one or more of claims 1-36, 38, 42-49, and
51-58 of U.S. Patent No. 6,685,469; claim 1 of U.S. Patent No.
6,450,807; claims 1-4 of U.S. Patent No. 6,394,801; claims 21, 22,
24-30, 32-36, 38, and 39 of U.S. Patent No. 6,398,548; claims 1, 2,
4-8, 10, and 12-18 of U.S. Patent No. 6,722,880; claims 1-3, 6-8,
and 11 of U.S. Patent No. 6,629,840; claims 1, 2, 9, and 10 of U.S.
Patent No. 6,699,037; claims 1-18, 20-23, 25, 26, and 29-38 of U.S.
Patent No. 6,318,994; claims 1-22 and 28 of U.S. Patent No.
6,729,876; claims 34-56 and 59-65 of U.S. Patent No. 6,602,070;
claims 1-6, 9, and 10 of U.S. Patent No. 6,471,511; and claims 1-13,
15, 16, and 18 of U.S. Patent No. 6,227,850, and whether an industry
in the United States exists as required by subsection (a)(2) of
section 337; or
(b) Whether there is a violation of subsection (a)(1)(A) of
section 337 in the importation into the United States of certain
incremental dental positioning adjustment appliances or in the sale
of such articles by reason of misappropriation of trade secrets, the
threat or effect of which is to destroy or substantially injure an
industry in the United States.
(2) For the purpose of the investigation so instituted, the
following are hereby named as parties upon which this notice of
investigation shall be served:
(a) The complainant is--Align Technology, Inc., 881 Martin
Avenue, Santa Clara, California 95050.
(b) The respondents are the following entities alleged to be in
violation of section 337, and are the parties upon which the
complaint is to be served:
OrthoClear, Inc., 580 California St., Suite 1725, San Francisco, CA
94104
OrthoClear Holdings, Inc., c/o Walkers (BV) Limited, Walkers
Chambers, P.O. Box 92, Tortola, British Virgin Islands
OrthoClear Pakistan Pvt, Ltd., 8-Aitchison Rd., 1-km Thoker, Niaz
Baig, Raiwind Rd., Lahore, Pakistan
(c) Jay H. Reiziss, Esq., Office of Unfair Import
Investigations, U.S. International Trade Commission, 500 E Street,
SW., Suite 401, Washington, DC 20436, who shall be the Commission
investigative attorney, party to this investigation; and
(3) For the investigation so instituted, the Honorable Robert L.
Barton, Jr. is designated as the presiding administrative law judge.
Responses to the complaint and the notice of investigation must be
submitted by the named respondents in accordance with section 210.13 of
the Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure, 19 CFR 210.13.
Pursuant to 19 CFR 201.16(d) and 210.13(a), such responses will be
considered by the Commission if received not later than 20 days after
the date of service by the Commission of the complaint and the notice
of investigation. Extensions of time for submitting responses to the
complaint and the notice of investigation will not be granted unless
good cause therefor is shown.
Failure of a respondent to file a timely response to each
allegation in the complaint and in this notice may be deemed to
constitute a waiver of the right to appear and contest the allegations
of the complaint and this notice, and to authorize the administrative
law judge and the Commission, without further notice to the
respondents, to find the facts to be as alleged in the complaint and
this notice and to enter a final determination containing such
findings, and may result in the issuance of a limited exclusion order
or cease and desist order or both directed against the respondent.
By order of the Commission.
Issued: February 9, 2006.
Marilyn R. Abbott,
Secretary to the Commission.
[FR Doc. E6-2164 Filed 2-14-06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7020-02-P