In the Matter of Certain Incremental Dental Positioning Adjustment Appliances and Methods of Producing Same; Notice of Investigation, 7995-7996 [E6-2164]

Download as PDF Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 31 / Wednesday, February 15, 2006 / Notices DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR Bureau of Land Management National Indian Gaming Commission [WO–310–06–1310–EPAI] Fee Rates Implementation of the Split Estate Section 1835 of the Energy Policy Act of 2005; Listening Sessions AGENCY: AGENCY: Bureau of Land Management, Interior. Notice of public listening sessions. ACTION: Listening sessions will be held by the Bureau of Land Management to solicit suggestions from the public on how best to implement the split estate provisions of the Energy Policy Act of 2005. Section 1835 of the Energy Policy Act directs the Secretary of the Interior to review current policies and practices for managing oil and gas resources in split estate situations, that is, how the BLM provides for oil and gas development and environmental protection where the surface estate is privately owned and the mineral estate is owned and administered by the Federal Government. The Act directs that this review be conducted in consultation with affected private surface owners, oil and gas industry, and other interested parties. Dates and Locations: Listening Sessions will be scheduled during late March 2006 in Colorado, Montana, New Mexico, Wyoming, and Washington, DC. The BLM will announce exact times and locations through the local media, email, and on the Split Estate Web site at: http://www.blm.gov/bmp at least 15 days prior to the listening sessions. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jim Perry, Senior Natural Resource Specialist for the BLM Fluid Minerals Program at (202) 452–5063, or visit the Split Estate Web site at http:// www.blm.gov/bmp. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The listening sessions will begin with an overview of the split estate provisions of the Energy Policy Act and current split estate practices, policies, regulations, and laws that guide management of the Federal mineral estate. Participants who request to speak will be provided a set amount of time to provide recommendations for managing oil and gas resources in split estate situations. cprice-sewell on PROD1PC66 with NOTICES SUMMARY: National Indian Gaming Commission, Interior. ACTION: Notice. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Bobby Gordon, National Indian Gaming Commission, 1441 L Street, NW., Suite 9100, Washington, DC 20005; telephone 202/632–7003; fax 202/632–7066 (these are not toll-free numbers). The Indian Gaming Regulatory Act established the National Indian Gaming Commission whish is charged with, among other things, regulating gaming on Indian lands. The regulations of the Commission (25 CFR part 514), as amended, provide for a system of fee assessment and payment that is self-administered by gaming operations. Pursuant to those regulations, the Commission is required to adopt and communicate assessment rates; the gaming operations are required to apply those rates to their revenues, compute the fees to be paid, report the revenues, and remit the fees to the Commission on a quarterly basis. The regulations of the Commission and the preliminary rate being adopted today are effective for calendar year 2006. Therefore, all gaming operations within the jurisdiction of the Commission are required to selfadminister the provisions of these regulations and report and pay any fees that are due to the Commission by March 31, 2006. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Irene Schrader, Director of Administration, National Indian Gaming Commission. [FR Doc. 06–1403 Filed 2–14–06; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4310–84–P BILLING CODE 7565–01–M 16:15 Feb 14, 2006 Jkt 208001 PO 00000 Frm 00084 Fmt 4703 INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION [Inv. No. 337–TA–562] In the Matter of Certain Incremental Dental Positioning Adjustment Appliances and Methods of Producing Same; Notice of Investigation U.S. International Trade Commission. ACTION: Institution of investigation pursuant to 19 U.S.C. 1337. AGENCY: Notice is hereby given, pursuant to 25 CFR 514.1(a)(3), that the National Indian Gaming Commission has adopted preliminary annual fee rates of 0.00% for tier 1 and 0.053% (.00053) for tier 2 for calendar year 2006. These rates shall apply to all assessable gross revenues from each gaming operation under the jurisdiction of the Commission. If a tribe has a certificate of self-regulation under 25 CFR part 518, the preliminary fee rate on class II revenues for calendar year 2006 shall be one-half of the annual fee rate, which is 0.0265% (.000265). SUMMARY: Dated: February 7, 2006. Thomas P. Lonnie, Assistant Director, Minerals, Realty and Resource Protection. [FR Doc. E6–2092 Filed 2–14–06; 8:45 am] VerDate Aug<31>2005 7995 Sfmt 4703 SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that a complaint was filed with the U.S. International Trade Commission on January 11, 2006, under section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, 19 U.S.C. 1337, on behalf of Align Technology, Inc. The complaint alleges violations of section 337 in the importation into the United States, the sale for importation, and the sale within the United States after importation of certain incremental dental positioning adjustment appliances by reason of infringement of claims 1–36, 38, 42–49, and 51–58 of U.S. Patent No. 6,685,469; claim 1 of U.S. Patent No. 6,450,807; claims 1–4 of U.S. Patent No. 6,394,801; claims 21, 22, 24–30, 32–36, 38, and 39 of U.S. Patent No. 6,398,548; claims 1, 2, 4–8, 10, and 12–18 of U.S. Patent No. 6,722,880; claims 1–3, 6–8, and 11 of U.S. Patent No. 6,629,840; claims 1, 2, 9, and 10 of U.S. Patent No. 6,699,037; claims 1–18, 20–23, 25, 26, and 29–38 of U.S. Patent No. 6,318,994; claims 1– 22 and 28 of U.S. Patent No. 6,729,876; claims 34–56 and 59–65 of U.S. Patent No. 6,602,070; claims 1–6, 9, and 10 of U.S. Patent No. 6,471,511; and claims 1– 13, 15, 16, and 18 of U.S. Patent No. 6,227,850; and also by reason of misappropriation of trade secrets, the threat or effect of which is to destroy or substantially injure an industry in the United States. The complaint further alleges that an industry in the United States exists as required by subsection (a)(2) of section 337. The complainant requests that the Commission institute an investigation and, after the investigation, issue a permanent exclusion order and permanent cease and desist orders. ADDRESSES: The complaint, except for any confidential information contained therein, is available for inspection during official business hours (8:45 a.m. to 5:15 p.m.) in the Office of the Secretary, U.S. International Trade Commission, 500 E Street, SW., Room 112, Washington, DC 20436, telephone 202–205–2000. Hearing impaired individuals are advised that information on this matter can be obtained by E:\FR\FM\15FEN1.SGM 15FEN1 7996 Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 31 / Wednesday, February 15, 2006 / Notices contacting the Commission’s TDD terminal on 202–205–1810. Persons with mobility impairments who will need special assistance in gaining access to the Commission should contact the Office of the Secretary at 202–205–2000. General information concerning the Commission may also be obtained by accessing its Internet server at http:// www.usitc.gov. The public record for this investigation may be viewed on the Commission’s electronic docket (EDIS) at http://edis.usitc.gov. Jay H. Reiziss, Esq., Office of Unfair Import Investigations, U.S. International Trade Commission, telephone 202–205–2579. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Authority: The authority for institution of this investigation is contained in section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, and in section 210.10 of the Commission’s Rules of Practice and Procedure, 19 CFR 210.10 (2005). cprice-sewell on PROD1PC66 with NOTICES Scope of Investigation: Having considered the complaint, the U.S. International Trade Commission, on February 7, 2006, Ordered That— (1) Pursuant to subsection (b) of section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, an investigation be instituted to determine: (a) Whether there is a violation of subsection (a)(1)(B) of section 337 in the importation into the United States, the sale for importation, or the sale within the United States after importation of certain incremental dental positioning adjustment appliances by reason of infringement of one or more of claims 1–36, 38, 42–49, and 51– 58 of U.S. Patent No. 6,685,469; claim 1 of U.S. Patent No. 6,450,807; claims 1–4 of U.S. Patent No. 6,394,801; claims 21, 22, 24–30, 32–36, 38, and 39 of U.S. Patent No. 6,398,548; claims 1, 2, 4–8, 10, and 12–18 of U.S. Patent No. 6,722,880; claims 1–3, 6–8, and 11 of U.S. Patent No. 6,629,840; claims 1, 2, 9, and 10 of U.S. Patent No. 6,699,037; claims 1–18, 20–23, 25, 26, and 29–38 of U.S. Patent No. 6,318,994; claims 1–22 and 28 of U.S. Patent No. 6,729,876; claims 34–56 and 59–65 of U.S. Patent No. 6,602,070; claims 1– 6, 9, and 10 of U.S. Patent No. 6,471,511; and claims 1–13, 15, 16, and 18 of U.S. Patent No. 6,227,850, and whether an industry in the United States exists as required by subsection (a)(2) of section 337; or (b) Whether there is a violation of subsection (a)(1)(A) of section 337 in the importation into the United States of certain incremental dental positioning adjustment appliances or in the sale of such articles by reason of misappropriation of trade secrets, the threat or effect of which is to destroy or substantially injure an industry in the United States. (2) For the purpose of the investigation so instituted, the following are hereby named as parties upon which this notice of investigation shall be served: (a) The complainant is—Align Technology, Inc., 881 Martin Avenue, Santa Clara, California 95050. VerDate Aug<31>2005 13:17 Feb 14, 2006 Jkt 208001 (b) The respondents are the following entities alleged to be in violation of section 337, and are the parties upon which the complaint is to be served: OrthoClear, Inc., 580 California St., Suite 1725, San Francisco, CA 94104 OrthoClear Holdings, Inc., c/o Walkers (BV) Limited, Walkers Chambers, P.O. Box 92, Tortola, British Virgin Islands OrthoClear Pakistan Pvt, Ltd., 8-Aitchison Rd., 1-km Thoker, Niaz Baig, Raiwind Rd., Lahore, Pakistan (c) Jay H. Reiziss, Esq., Office of Unfair Import Investigations, U.S. International Trade Commission, 500 E Street, SW., Suite 401, Washington, DC 20436, who shall be the Commission investigative attorney, party to this investigation; and (3) For the investigation so instituted, the Honorable Robert L. Barton, Jr. is designated as the presiding administrative law judge. Responses to the complaint and the notice of investigation must be submitted by the named respondents in accordance with section 210.13 of the Commission’s Rules of Practice and Procedure, 19 CFR 210.13. Pursuant to 19 CFR 201.16(d) and 210.13(a), such responses will be considered by the Commission if received not later than 20 days after the date of service by the Commission of the complaint and the notice of investigation. Extensions of time for submitting responses to the complaint and the notice of investigation will not be granted unless good cause therefor is shown. Failure of a respondent to file a timely response to each allegation in the complaint and in this notice may be deemed to constitute a waiver of the right to appear and contest the allegations of the complaint and this notice, and to authorize the administrative law judge and the Commission, without further notice to the respondents, to find the facts to be as alleged in the complaint and this notice and to enter a final determination containing such findings, and may result in the issuance of a limited exclusion order or cease and desist order or both directed against the respondent. By order of the Commission. Issued: February 9, 2006. Marilyn R. Abbott, Secretary to the Commission. [FR Doc. E6–2164 Filed 2–14–06; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 7020–02–P PO 00000 Frm 00085 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION [Investigation No. 337–TA–549] In the Matter of Certain Ink Sticks for Solid Ink Printers; Notice of Request for Written Submissions on Remedy, the Public Interest, and Bonding With Respect to the Respondents Found in Default U.S. International Trade Commission. ACTION: Notice. AGENCY: SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that the U.S. International Trade Commission is requesting briefing on remedy, the public interest, and bonding with respect to two respondents previously found in default. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Michelle Walters, Esq., Office of the General Counsel, U.S. International Trade Commission, 500 E Street, SW., Washington, DC 20436, telephone (202) 708–5468. Copies of non-confidential documents filed in connection with this investigation are or will be available for inspection during official business hours (8:45 a.m. to 5:15 p.m.) in the Office of the Secretary, U.S. International Trade Commission, 500 E Street, SW., Washington, DC 20436, telephone (202) 205–2000. General information concerning the Commission may also be obtained by accessing its Internet server at http://www.usitc.gov. The public record for this investigation may be viewed on the Commission’s electronic docket (EDIS) at http:// edis.usitc.gov. Hearing-impaired persons are advised that information on this matter can be obtained by contacting the Commission’s TDD terminal on (202) 205–1810. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Commission instituted this investigation by notice on September 6, 2005, based on a complaint filed by Xerox Corporation (‘‘Xerox’’) of Stamford, Connecticut. The complaint, as amended, alleges violations of section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930 (19 U.S.C. 1337) in the importation into the United States, the sale for importation, and the sale within the United States after importation of certain ink sticks used in solid ink printers by reason of infringement of claim 16 of United States Patent No. 6,739,713, claims 5–10 and 13–14 of United States Patent No. 6,840,613, and claims 1–2 of United States Patent No. 6,840,612. The complaint further alleges the existence of a domestic industry. The Commission’s notice of investigation E:\FR\FM\15FEN1.SGM 15FEN1

Agencies

[Federal Register Volume 71, Number 31 (Wednesday, February 15, 2006)]
[Notices]
[Pages 7995-7996]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E6-2164]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION

[Inv. No. 337-TA-562]


In the Matter of Certain Incremental Dental Positioning 
Adjustment Appliances and Methods of Producing Same; Notice of 
Investigation

AGENCY: U.S. International Trade Commission.

ACTION: Institution of investigation pursuant to 19 U.S.C. 1337.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that a complaint was filed with the 
U.S. International Trade Commission on January 11, 2006, under section 
337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, 19 U.S.C. 1337, on behalf of 
Align Technology, Inc. The complaint alleges violations of section 337 
in the importation into the United States, the sale for importation, 
and the sale within the United States after importation of certain 
incremental dental positioning adjustment appliances by reason of 
infringement of claims 1-36, 38, 42-49, and 51-58 of U.S. Patent No. 
6,685,469; claim 1 of U.S. Patent No. 6,450,807; claims 1-4 of U.S. 
Patent No. 6,394,801; claims 21, 22, 24-30, 32-36, 38, and 39 of U.S. 
Patent No. 6,398,548; claims 1, 2, 4-8, 10, and 12-18 of U.S. Patent 
No. 6,722,880; claims 1-3, 6-8, and 11 of U.S. Patent No. 6,629,840; 
claims 1, 2, 9, and 10 of U.S. Patent No. 6,699,037; claims 1-18, 20-
23, 25, 26, and 29-38 of U.S. Patent No. 6,318,994; claims 1-22 and 28 
of U.S. Patent No. 6,729,876; claims 34-56 and 59-65 of U.S. Patent No. 
6,602,070; claims 1-6, 9, and 10 of U.S. Patent No. 6,471,511; and 
claims 1-13, 15, 16, and 18 of U.S. Patent No. 6,227,850; and also by 
reason of misappropriation of trade secrets, the threat or effect of 
which is to destroy or substantially injure an industry in the United 
States. The complaint further alleges that an industry in the United 
States exists as required by subsection (a)(2) of section 337.
    The complainant requests that the Commission institute an 
investigation and, after the investigation, issue a permanent exclusion 
order and permanent cease and desist orders.

ADDRESSES: The complaint, except for any confidential information 
contained therein, is available for inspection during official business 
hours (8:45 a.m. to 5:15 p.m.) in the Office of the Secretary, U.S. 
International Trade Commission, 500 E Street, SW., Room 112, 
Washington, DC 20436, telephone 202-205-2000. Hearing impaired 
individuals are advised that information on this matter can be obtained 
by

[[Page 7996]]

contacting the Commission's TDD terminal on 202-205-1810. Persons with 
mobility impairments who will need special assistance in gaining access 
to the Commission should contact the Office of the Secretary at 202-
205-2000. General information concerning the Commission may also be 
obtained by accessing its Internet server at http://www.usitc.gov. The 
public record for this investigation may be viewed on the Commission's 
electronic docket (EDIS) at http://edis.usitc.gov.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jay H. Reiziss, Esq., Office of Unfair 
Import Investigations, U.S. International Trade Commission, telephone 
202-205-2579.

    Authority: The authority for institution of this investigation 
is contained in section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, 
and in section 210.10 of the Commission's Rules of Practice and 
Procedure, 19 CFR 210.10 (2005).

    Scope of Investigation: Having considered the complaint, the U.S. 
International Trade Commission, on February 7, 2006, Ordered That--

    (1) Pursuant to subsection (b) of section 337 of the Tariff Act 
of 1930, as amended, an investigation be instituted to determine:
    (a) Whether there is a violation of subsection (a)(1)(B) of 
section 337 in the importation into the United States, the sale for 
importation, or the sale within the United States after importation 
of certain incremental dental positioning adjustment appliances by 
reason of infringement of one or more of claims 1-36, 38, 42-49, and 
51-58 of U.S. Patent No. 6,685,469; claim 1 of U.S. Patent No. 
6,450,807; claims 1-4 of U.S. Patent No. 6,394,801; claims 21, 22, 
24-30, 32-36, 38, and 39 of U.S. Patent No. 6,398,548; claims 1, 2, 
4-8, 10, and 12-18 of U.S. Patent No. 6,722,880; claims 1-3, 6-8, 
and 11 of U.S. Patent No. 6,629,840; claims 1, 2, 9, and 10 of U.S. 
Patent No. 6,699,037; claims 1-18, 20-23, 25, 26, and 29-38 of U.S. 
Patent No. 6,318,994; claims 1-22 and 28 of U.S. Patent No. 
6,729,876; claims 34-56 and 59-65 of U.S. Patent No. 6,602,070; 
claims 1-6, 9, and 10 of U.S. Patent No. 6,471,511; and claims 1-13, 
15, 16, and 18 of U.S. Patent No. 6,227,850, and whether an industry 
in the United States exists as required by subsection (a)(2) of 
section 337; or
    (b) Whether there is a violation of subsection (a)(1)(A) of 
section 337 in the importation into the United States of certain 
incremental dental positioning adjustment appliances or in the sale 
of such articles by reason of misappropriation of trade secrets, the 
threat or effect of which is to destroy or substantially injure an 
industry in the United States.
    (2) For the purpose of the investigation so instituted, the 
following are hereby named as parties upon which this notice of 
investigation shall be served:
    (a) The complainant is--Align Technology, Inc., 881 Martin 
Avenue, Santa Clara, California 95050.
    (b) The respondents are the following entities alleged to be in 
violation of section 337, and are the parties upon which the 
complaint is to be served:

OrthoClear, Inc., 580 California St., Suite 1725, San Francisco, CA 
94104
OrthoClear Holdings, Inc., c/o Walkers (BV) Limited, Walkers 
Chambers, P.O. Box 92, Tortola, British Virgin Islands
OrthoClear Pakistan Pvt, Ltd., 8-Aitchison Rd., 1-km Thoker, Niaz 
Baig, Raiwind Rd., Lahore, Pakistan

    (c) Jay H. Reiziss, Esq., Office of Unfair Import 
Investigations, U.S. International Trade Commission, 500 E Street, 
SW., Suite 401, Washington, DC 20436, who shall be the Commission 
investigative attorney, party to this investigation; and
    (3) For the investigation so instituted, the Honorable Robert L. 
Barton, Jr. is designated as the presiding administrative law judge.

    Responses to the complaint and the notice of investigation must be 
submitted by the named respondents in accordance with section 210.13 of 
the Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure, 19 CFR 210.13. 
Pursuant to 19 CFR 201.16(d) and 210.13(a), such responses will be 
considered by the Commission if received not later than 20 days after 
the date of service by the Commission of the complaint and the notice 
of investigation. Extensions of time for submitting responses to the 
complaint and the notice of investigation will not be granted unless 
good cause therefor is shown.
    Failure of a respondent to file a timely response to each 
allegation in the complaint and in this notice may be deemed to 
constitute a waiver of the right to appear and contest the allegations 
of the complaint and this notice, and to authorize the administrative 
law judge and the Commission, without further notice to the 
respondents, to find the facts to be as alleged in the complaint and 
this notice and to enter a final determination containing such 
findings, and may result in the issuance of a limited exclusion order 
or cease and desist order or both directed against the respondent.

    By order of the Commission.

    Issued: February 9, 2006.
Marilyn R. Abbott,
Secretary to the Commission.
 [FR Doc. E6-2164 Filed 2-14-06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7020-02-P