In the Matter of Certain NOR and NAND Flash Memory Devices and Products Containing Same; Notice of Investigation, 7576 [E6-1996]
Download as PDF
7576
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 29 / Monday, February 13, 2006 / Notices
request by a Commissioner or
Commission staff.
In accordance with sections 201.16(c)
and 207.3 of the Commission’s rules,
each document filed by a party to the
investigation must be served on all other
parties to the investigation (as identified
by either the public or BPI service list),
and a certificate of service must be
timely filed. The Secretary will not
accept a document for filing without a
certificate of service.
Authority: This investigation is being
conducted under authority of title VII of the
Tariff Act of 1930; this notice is published
pursuant to section 207.21 of the
Commission’s rules.
Issued: February 8, 2006.
By order of the Commission.
Marilyn R. Abbott,
Secretary to the Commission.
[FR Doc. E6–2002 Filed 2–10–06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7020–02–P
INTERNATIONAL TRADE
COMMISSION
[Inv. No. 337–TA–560]
In the Matter of Certain NOR and NAND
Flash Memory Devices and Products
Containing Same; Notice of
Investigation
U.S. International Trade
Commission.
ACTION: Institution of investigation
pursuant to 19 U.S.C. 1337.
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with NOTICES
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that a
complaint was filed with the U.S.
International Trade Commission on
January 10, 2006, under section 337 of
the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, 19
U.S.C. 1337, on behalf of SanDisk
Corporation of Sunnyvale, California. A
supplemental letter was submitted by
SanDisk on January 24, 2006. The
complaint, as supplemented, alleges
violations of section 337 in the
importation into the United States, the
sale for importation, and the sale within
the United States after importation of
certain NOR and NAND flash memory
devices by reason of infringement of
claims 27, 28, 32, 50, 51, and 64 of U.S.
Patent No. 5,172,338, claims 1–8 and
10–14 of U.S. Patent No. 5,991,517, and
claims 7 and 10 of U.S. Patent No.
6,542,956. The complaint further alleges
that an industry in the United States
exists as required by subsection (a)(2) of
section 337.
The complainant requests that the
Commission institute an investigation
and, after the investigation, issue a
permanent exclusion order and a cease
and desist order.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
17:38 Feb 10, 2006
Jkt 208001
The complaint, except for
any confidential information contained
therein, is available for inspection
during official business hours (8:45 a.m.
to 5:15 p.m.) in the Office of the
Secretary, U.S. International Trade
Commission, 500 E Street, SW., Room
112, Washington, DC 20436, telephone
202–205–2000. Hearing impaired
individuals are advised that information
on this matter can be obtained by
contacting the Commission’s TDD
terminal on 202–205–1810. Persons
with mobility impairments who will
need special assistance in gaining access
to the Commission should contact the
Office of the Secretary at 202–205–2000.
General information concerning the
Commission may also be obtained by
accessing its Internet server at https://
www.usitc.gov. The public record for
this investigation may be viewed on the
Commission’s electronic docket (EDIS)
at https://edis.usitc.gov.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
David H. Hollander, Jr., Esq., Office of
Unfair Import Investigations, U.S.
International Trade Commission,
telephone 202–205–2746.
ADDRESSES:
Authority: The authority for institution of
this investigation is contained in section 337
of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, and
in § 210.10 of the Commission’s Rules of
Practice and Procedure, 19 CFR 210.10
(2005).
Scope of Investigation: Having
considered the complaint, the U.S.
International Trade Commission, on
February 7, 2006, Ordered that—
(1) Pursuant to subsection (b) of
section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as
amended, an investigation be instituted
to determine whether there is a
violation of subsection (a)(1)(B) of
section 337 in the importation into the
United States, the sale for importation,
or the sale within the United States after
importation of certain NOR or NAND
flash memory devices by reason of
infringement of one or more of claims
27, 28, 32, 50, 51, and 64 of U.S. Patent
No. 5,172,338, claims 1–8 and 10–14 of
U.S. Patent No. 5,991,517, and claims 7
and 10 of U.S. Patent No. 6,542,956, and
whether an industry in the United
States exists as required by subsection
(a)(2) of section 337.
(2) For the purpose of the
investigation so instituted, the following
are hereby named as parties upon which
this notice of investigation shall be
served:
(a) The complainant is—SanDisk
Corporation, 140 Caspian Court,
Sunnyvale, California 94089.
(b) The respondents are the following
entities alleged to be in violation of
section 337, and are the parties upon
PO 00000
Frm 00074
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
which the complaint is to be served:
STMicroelectronics N.V., 39, Chemin du
Champ des Filles, C.P. 21, CH 1228
Plan-Les-Ouates, Geneva, Switzerland.
STMicroelectronics, Inc., 1310
Electronics Drive M/S 2308, Carrollton,
Texas 75006.
(c) David H. Hollander, Jr., Esq.,
Office of Unfair Import Investigations,
U.S. International Trade Commission,
500 E Street, SW., Suite 401,
Washington, DC 20436, who shall be the
Commission investigative attorney,
party to this investigation; and
(3) For the investigation so instituted,
the Honorable Charles E. Bullock is
designated as the presiding
administrative law judge.
Responses to the complaint and the
notice of investigation must be
submitted by the named respondents in
accordance with § 210.13 of the
Commission’s Rules of Practice and
Procedure, 19 CFR 210.13. Pursuant to
19 CFR 201.16(d) and 210.13(a), such
responses will be considered by the
Commission if received not later than 20
days after the date of service by the
Commission of the complaint and the
notice of investigation. Extensions of
time for submitting responses to the
complaint and the notice of
investigation will not be granted unless
good cause therefor is shown.
Failure of a respondent to file a timely
response to each allegation in the
complaint and in this notice may be
deemed to constitute a waiver of the
right to appear and contest the
allegations of the complaint and this
notice, and to authorize the
administrative law judge and the
Commission, without further notice to
the respondent, to find the facts to be as
alleged in the complaint and this notice
and to enter a final determination
containing such findings, and may
result in the issuance of a limited
exclusion order or cease and desist
order or both directed against the
respondent.
By order of the Commission.
Issued: February 8, 2006.
Marilyn R. Abbott,
Secretary to the Commission.
[FR Doc. E6–1996 Filed 2–10–06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7020–02–P
E:\FR\FM\13FEN1.SGM
13FEN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 71, Number 29 (Monday, February 13, 2006)]
[Notices]
[Page 7576]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E6-1996]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION
[Inv. No. 337-TA-560]
In the Matter of Certain NOR and NAND Flash Memory Devices and
Products Containing Same; Notice of Investigation
AGENCY: U.S. International Trade Commission.
ACTION: Institution of investigation pursuant to 19 U.S.C. 1337.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that a complaint was filed with the
U.S. International Trade Commission on January 10, 2006, under section
337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, 19 U.S.C. 1337, on behalf of
SanDisk Corporation of Sunnyvale, California. A supplemental letter was
submitted by SanDisk on January 24, 2006. The complaint, as
supplemented, alleges violations of section 337 in the importation into
the United States, the sale for importation, and the sale within the
United States after importation of certain NOR and NAND flash memory
devices by reason of infringement of claims 27, 28, 32, 50, 51, and 64
of U.S. Patent No. 5,172,338, claims 1-8 and 10-14 of U.S. Patent No.
5,991,517, and claims 7 and 10 of U.S. Patent No. 6,542,956. The
complaint further alleges that an industry in the United States exists
as required by subsection (a)(2) of section 337.
The complainant requests that the Commission institute an
investigation and, after the investigation, issue a permanent exclusion
order and a cease and desist order.
ADDRESSES: The complaint, except for any confidential information
contained therein, is available for inspection during official business
hours (8:45 a.m. to 5:15 p.m.) in the Office of the Secretary, U.S.
International Trade Commission, 500 E Street, SW., Room 112,
Washington, DC 20436, telephone 202-205-2000. Hearing impaired
individuals are advised that information on this matter can be obtained
by contacting the Commission's TDD terminal on 202-205-1810. Persons
with mobility impairments who will need special assistance in gaining
access to the Commission should contact the Office of the Secretary at
202-205-2000. General information concerning the Commission may also be
obtained by accessing its Internet server at https://www.usitc.gov. The
public record for this investigation may be viewed on the Commission's
electronic docket (EDIS) at https://edis.usitc.gov.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: David H. Hollander, Jr., Esq., Office
of Unfair Import Investigations, U.S. International Trade Commission,
telephone 202-205-2746.
Authority: The authority for institution of this investigation
is contained in section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended,
and in Sec. 210.10 of the Commission's Rules of Practice and
Procedure, 19 CFR 210.10 (2005).
Scope of Investigation: Having considered the complaint, the U.S.
International Trade Commission, on February 7, 2006, Ordered that--
(1) Pursuant to subsection (b) of section 337 of the Tariff Act of
1930, as amended, an investigation be instituted to determine whether
there is a violation of subsection (a)(1)(B) of section 337 in the
importation into the United States, the sale for importation, or the
sale within the United States after importation of certain NOR or NAND
flash memory devices by reason of infringement of one or more of claims
27, 28, 32, 50, 51, and 64 of U.S. Patent No. 5,172,338, claims 1-8 and
10-14 of U.S. Patent No. 5,991,517, and claims 7 and 10 of U.S. Patent
No. 6,542,956, and whether an industry in the United States exists as
required by subsection (a)(2) of section 337.
(2) For the purpose of the investigation so instituted, the
following are hereby named as parties upon which this notice of
investigation shall be served:
(a) The complainant is--SanDisk Corporation, 140 Caspian Court,
Sunnyvale, California 94089.
(b) The respondents are the following entities alleged to be in
violation of section 337, and are the parties upon which the complaint
is to be served: STMicroelectronics N.V., 39, Chemin du Champ des
Filles, C.P. 21, CH 1228 Plan-Les-Ouates, Geneva, Switzerland.
STMicroelectronics, Inc., 1310 Electronics Drive M/S 2308, Carrollton,
Texas 75006.
(c) David H. Hollander, Jr., Esq., Office of Unfair Import
Investigations, U.S. International Trade Commission, 500 E Street, SW.,
Suite 401, Washington, DC 20436, who shall be the Commission
investigative attorney, party to this investigation; and
(3) For the investigation so instituted, the Honorable Charles E.
Bullock is designated as the presiding administrative law judge.
Responses to the complaint and the notice of investigation must be
submitted by the named respondents in accordance with Sec. 210.13 of
the Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure, 19 CFR 210.13.
Pursuant to 19 CFR 201.16(d) and 210.13(a), such responses will be
considered by the Commission if received not later than 20 days after
the date of service by the Commission of the complaint and the notice
of investigation. Extensions of time for submitting responses to the
complaint and the notice of investigation will not be granted unless
good cause therefor is shown.
Failure of a respondent to file a timely response to each
allegation in the complaint and in this notice may be deemed to
constitute a waiver of the right to appear and contest the allegations
of the complaint and this notice, and to authorize the administrative
law judge and the Commission, without further notice to the respondent,
to find the facts to be as alleged in the complaint and this notice and
to enter a final determination containing such findings, and may result
in the issuance of a limited exclusion order or cease and desist order
or both directed against the respondent.
By order of the Commission.
Issued: February 8, 2006.
Marilyn R. Abbott,
Secretary to the Commission.
[FR Doc. E6-1996 Filed 2-10-06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7020-02-P