Indian and Native American Employment and Training Programs; Solicitation for Grant Applications and Announcement of Competition Waivers for Program Years 2006 and 2007, 7579-7592 [06-1251]
Download as PDF
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 29 / Monday, February 13, 2006 / Notices
Comments should be sent to Office of
Information and Regulatory Affairs,
Attn: OMB Desk Officer for the Bureau
of Labor Statistics (BLS), Office of
Management and Budget, Room 10235,
Washington, DC 20503, 202–395–7316
(this is not a toll-free number), within
30 days from the date of this publication
in the Federal Register.
The OMB is particularly interested in
comments which:
• Evaluate whether the proposed
collection of information is necessary
for the proper performance of the
functions of the agency, including
whether the information will have
practical utility;
• Evaluate the accuracy of the
agency’s estimate of the burden of the
proposed collection of information,
including the validity of the
methodology and assumptions used;
• Enhance the quality, utility, and
clarity of the information to be
collected; and
• Minimize the burden of the
collection of information on those who
are to respond, including through the
use of appropriate automated,
electronic, mechanical, or other
technological collection techniques or
other forms of information technology,
e.g., permitting electronic submission of
responses.
Agency: Bureau of Labor Statistics.
Type of Review: Extension of a
currently approved collection.
Title: Job Openings and Labor
Turnover Survey (JOLTS).
OMB Number: 1220–0170.
Frequency: Monthly.
Type of Response: Reporting.
Affected Public: Business and other
for-profit; Not-for-profit institutions;
Federal Government; and State, local, or
tribal government.
Number of Respondents: 16,400.
Number of Annual Responses:
132,840.
Estimated Average Response: 10
minutes.
Total Burden Hours: 22,140.
Total Annualized Capital/Startup
Costs: $0.
Total Annual Costs (operating/
maintaining systems or purchasing
services): $0.
Description: The Job Openings and
Labor Turnover Survey (JOLTS) will
collect data on job vacancies, labor
hires, and labor separations. The data
are used as demand-side indicators of
labor shortages. These indicators of
labor shortages at the national level
greatly enhance policy makers’
understanding of imbalances between
the demand and supply of labor.
Presently there is no other economic
indicator of labor demand with which to
VerDate Aug<31>2005
17:38 Feb 10, 2006
Jkt 208001
assess the presence of labor shortages in
the U.S. labor market. The availability of
unfilled jobs is an important measure of
tightness of job markets, symmetrical to
unemployment measures.
Ira L. Mills,
Departmental Clearance Officer.
[FR Doc. E6–1948 Filed 2–10–06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510–24–P
DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
Employment and Training
Administration
Indian and Native American
Employment and Training Programs;
Solicitation for Grant Applications and
Announcement of Competition
Waivers for Program Years 2006 and
2007
Announcement Type: New. Notice of
Solicitation for Grant Applications and
Announcement of Competition Waivers.
Funding Opportunity Number: SGA/
DFA–PY–05–05.
Catalog of Federal Domestic
Assistance (CFDA) Number: 17.265
Key Dates: The closing date for receipt
of applications under this
announcement is by 5 p.m. (Eastern
Time), 30 days after the date of
publication in the Federal Register.
Application and submission
information is explained in detail in
Part IV of this Solicitation for Grant
Applications (SGA).
Summary: The U.S. Department of
Labor (DOL), Employment and Training
Administration (ETA), announces the
availability of competitive grant funds
to provide employment and training
services to Indians, Alaska Natives and
Native Hawaiians under section 166 of
the Workforce Investment Act (WIA) for
Program Years (PY) 2006, and 2007 (July
1, 2006 through June 30, 2008).
Competition for section 166 grants is
conducted every two years, except that
the Secretary may waive the
requirement for such competition for
current grantees that have performed
satisfactorily.
Through this Notice, the Department
announces that the Secretary has
waived competition for this solicitation
for grantees that have performed
satisfactorily under their current grant.
(See Attachment A for a list of grantees
receiving waivers.) To apply for an
award of funds for PY 2006 and 2007 for
their current service area, current
grantees receiving a waiver of
competition only need to submit a cover
letter, signed by an authorized
signatory, and a Standard Form (SF) 424
Application for Federal Assistance
PO 00000
Frm 00077
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
7579
(Version 02), which will serve as the
grantee’s ‘‘Notice of Intent’’ (NOI) to
continue providing WIA section 166
services. Submittals on https://
www.grants.gov, with authorized
electronic signatures, will also be
accepted in place of the hard copy cover
letter and SF 424.
The Secretary has also waived
competition for this solicitation for
those grantees operating a WIA section
166 training and employment program
as part of a Pub. L. 102–477
Demonstration Project, which allows
federally-recognized tribes, or entities
serving federally-recognized tribes, to
consolidate formula-funded
employment, training, and related
dollars under a single service plan
administered by the Department of the
Interior. (See Attachment B for a list of
Pub. L. 102–477 grantees.) Grantees
operating a WIA section 166 grant as
part of a Public Law 102–477
Demonstration Project will need to
submit a cover letter, signed by an
authorized signatory, and a Standard
Form (SF) 424 Application for Federal
Assistance (Version 02), which will
serve as the grantee’s ‘‘Notice of Intent’’
(NOI) to continue providing WIA
section 166 services to the address
provided in section IV (3) of this notice.
Submittals on https://www.grants.gov,
with authorized electronic signatures,
will also be accepted in place of the
hard copy cover letter and SF 424.
Competition for funding under this
solicitation is limited to the geographic
areas listed in Attachment C of this
SGA. Any eligible entity, including new
applicants and current grant recipients
serving other geographic areas, may
apply for funding to serve these areas.
Current grantees serving these
geographic areas are subject to
competition and must submit a grant
application as specified in Part IV (2) in
order to compete for their existing
service area.
Important: Organizations seeking WIA
section 166 funding for this period must
comply with the provisions of this SGA.
Late applications from current grantees
or new applicants will not be
considered for those geographic service
areas that are in competition (as listed
in Attachment C).
A list of current grantees and the
geographic areas they serve can be
found at: https://www.doleta.gov/dinap/
cfml/CensusData.cfm.
Addresses: Applications may be
submitted electronically on https://
www.grants.gov or in hard-copy via mail
or hand delivery. Mailed applications
must be sent to: U.S. Department of
Labor, ETA, Room N–4617, 200
Constitution Ave., NW., Washington,
E:\FR\FM\13FEN1.SGM
13FEN1
7580
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 29 / Monday, February 13, 2006 / Notices
DC 20210, Attention: James Stockton.
Applicants are advised that mail
delivery in the Washington, DC area
may be delayed due to mail
decontamination procedures. Hand
delivered proposals will be received at
the above address. Applications
submitted via facsimile (fax) machine
will not be accepted.
Supplementary Information: This
solicitation consists of eight parts and
three attachments:
• Part I provides the funding
description and background
information.
• Part II describes the size and nature
of the anticipated awards.
• Part III describes eligible applicants
and other grant specifications.
• Part IV provides information on the
application and submission process.
• Part V describes the criteria against
which applications will be reviewed
and evaluated, and explains the
proposal review process.
• Part VI provides award
administration information.
• Part VII contains DOL agency
contact information.
• Part VIII lists additional resources
of interest to applicants.
• Attachment A lists grantees
receiving waivers. As indicated, this list
also includes grantees which will
receive conditional designation with
conditions to be specified by the Grant
Officer and reflected in the grant award.
• Attachment B lists Public Law 102–
477 grantees receiving waivers.
• Attachment C lists grantees that did
not receive a waiver and areas/counties
open for competition and associated
funding amounts.
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with NOTICES
I. Funding Opportunity Description
Section 166 of the Workforce
Investment Act (WIA) makes funds
available to Indian tribes, tribal
organizations, Alaska Native entities,
Indian-controlled organizations serving
Indians, and Native Hawaiian
organizations to support employment
and training activities in order to: (A)
Develop more fully the academic,
occupational, and literacy skills of such
individuals, (B) make such individuals
more competitive in the workforce, and
(C) promote the economic and social
development of Indian, Alaska Native,
and Native Hawaiian communities in
accordance with the goals and values of
such communities. Requirements for
WIA section 166 programs are set forth
in WIA section 166 (29 U.S.C. 2911) and
its regulations, found at 20 CFR part
668, published at 65 FR 49294, 49435
(Aug. 11, 2000).
VerDate Aug<31>2005
17:38 Feb 10, 2006
Jkt 208001
1. Background on the Workforce
Investment Act (WIA), Section 166
Grants (Also Known as Indian and
Native American Grants or INA Grants)
The U.S. Department of Labor,
Employment & Training Administration
has awarded employment and training
grants to Indian tribes, urban Indian
centers, and other non-profit
organizations serving Indians, Alaska
Natives, and Native Hawaiians for over
30 years. These grants have been
authorized under various forms of
legislation such as the Job Training
Partnership Act (JTPA) enacted in 1982,
and its predecessor, the Comprehensive
Employment and Training Act (CETA)
enacted in 1973. While WIA maintains
most of the core program values that
existed in previous laws, it also
establishes key reforms that are
applicable to Native American
programs.
One of the key reforms under WIA is
the emphasis on the coordination of
federally-funded job training programs.
The mechanism used to coordinate
these various job training programs is
the One-Stop delivery system. Under
WIA, the Native American section 166
program is a required partner in the
One-Stop delivery system. As such,
grantees must execute a Memorandum
of Understanding (MOU) with the local
workforce investment board that
identifies the role of the INA grantee in
the One-Stop center. It is important that
section 166 grantees coordinate with
their local One-Stop service provider(s).
Applicants to this SGA should also be
aware of ETA’s move towards resultsoriented employment and training
programs. In order to better measure
performance, ETA has established
common measures for all ETA
programs. Listed below are the adult
performance outcomes that section 166
grants are measured by:
• Entered Employment
• Employment Retention
• Earnings Increase
Applicants which receive supplemental
youth funds will be measured by the
following criteria:
• Placement in Employment or
Education
• Attainment of a Degree or Certificate
• Literacy and Numeracy gains
Additional information on performance
measures can be found in ETA’s
Training and Employment Guidance
Letter (TEGL) 28–04 (April 15, 2005),
which can be found at: https://
wdr.doleta.gov/directives/attach/
TEGL28–04.pdf and at https://
www.doleta.gov/performance/guidance/
Adminstrators_Mtg_QA_for_web_1–12–
04.cfm#Common
PO 00000
Frm 00078
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
2. Waivers
As indicated in the Summary above,
the Secretary has the authority to grant
waivers from competition to grantees
that have performed satisfactorily under
their current grant. Incumbent grantees
that have performed satisfactorily, both
programmatically and administratively,
under the last two grant cycles will
receive a waiver from competition for
the PY 2006–2007, designation period
funded under this notice.
However, if DOL has found that the
grantee serving a geographic area
demonstrated substantial and persistent
failures of performance, that geographic
area was placed in competition,
UNLESS the grantee is serving a
geographic area over which it has legal
jurisdiction, as will be discussed in
greater detail in subsection (b) titled
‘‘Conditional Designation’’.
(a) Criteria for Determining Substantial
and Persistent Failures of Performance
As a baseline criteria for determining
substantial and persistent failures of
performance, the Department has
applied: (1) Program performance
measures, (2) the responsibility review
criteria at 20 CFR 667.170, and, (3) the
factors related to ability to administer
funds in 20 CFR 668.220 and 668.230.
The seriousness of the factors
supporting a finding of denying a
competition waiver is less than that
required to support a finding of nonresponsibility.
(b) Conditional Designation
The determination regarding whether
to deny a waiver required some
adjustment with respect to those
grantees with substantial and persistent
failures of performance that are
Federally recognized Indian tribes or
Alaska Native entities serving
geographic areas over which they have
legal jurisdiction and a priority for
designation under 20 CFR 668.210(a). In
these situations, the Department
determined that it will provide a waiver
and a conditional designation to such
grantees. This treatment is in
recognition that the Section 166
regulations provide a priority for
designation for Federally recognized
Indian tribes and Alaska Native entities
(or consortia that include such a tribe or
Alaska Native entity) regarding
geographic areas and/or populations
over which they have legal jurisdiction,
The conditions on the designation
will be specified by the Grant Officer in
the grant award. Conditional
designation means that such grantees
will be required to follow specific
instructions by the Grant Officer in
E:\FR\FM\13FEN1.SGM
13FEN1
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 29 / Monday, February 13, 2006 / Notices
regards to their substantial and
persistent failures of performance. The
designation of the grantee is limited to
the geographic area over which it has
legal jurisdiction as defined by 20 CFR
668.210(a). Those geographic areas
which the grantee serves but lacks legal
jurisdiction are subject to competition.
(c) Description of Attachments
Attachment A provides a list of
current grantees receiving competition
waivers (including those tribes and
Alaska Native entities that will receive
conditional designations). Attachment B
is a list of P.L. 102–477 grantees
receiving waivers. Attachment C is a list
of current grantees not receiving waivers
and associated geographic areas open to
competitive selection. If a grantee
received only conditional designation
and waiver from competition, the
grantee’s legal jurisdiction is not listed
on Attachment C.
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with NOTICES
3. Procedures after Designation
Being designated as a section 166
service provider, either under a waiver
or through competition, will not
automatically result in an immediate
award of grant funds. Entities that
successfully complete the designation
process, including winning any
competition(s) for service area(s) that
may occur as defined in this SGA, must
prepare a two-year Comprehensive
Services Program (CSP) Plan that must
be approved by DOL. Instructions for
preparation of the CSP Plan will be
issued to all designated service
providers under separate guidance.
After a section 166 designee’s CSP
Plan is approved by DOL, a grant
agreement (‘‘Notice of Obligation’’ or
NOO) must be executed in accordance
with 20 CFR 668.292. Each NOO will
reflect the amount of section 166 funds
awarded as determined in accordance
with 20 CFR 668.296 and 668.440.
II. Award Information
Type of assistance instrument: Funds
will be awarded under this solicitation
through two-year grants. Exact award
amounts will be determined by DOL
after designation of service areas and
service providers, and once funding
appropriations for the grant periods
have been made by Congress. Waivers of
competition have been made for the PY
06–07 grant cycle, as explained in
Section I(2) of this SGA.
The section 166 program is a ‘‘formula
funded’’ program that receives an
annual appropriation of not less than
$55,000,000 authorized under Section
174(a) of WIA. For PY2004–2005, this
amount was distributed throughout the
United States to 182 grantees. The
VerDate Aug<31>2005
17:38 Feb 10, 2006
Jkt 208001
amounts awarded under the CSP (Adult)
in PY 2005 ranged from $13,898 to
$6,011,664. The median grant award
amount was $171,735. Adult award
amounts for all section 166 grantees can
be found at: https://www.doleta.gov/
dinap/pdf/CSPholdHarmless.pdf.
Adult funding: The amount of funding
a grantee will receive for adult services
is based on a formula specified at 20
CFR 668.296(b). The CSP (Adult)
Funding Formula is as follows:
(1) One-quarter of the funds will be
allocated based on the percentage of
unemployed Native Americans living in
the grantee’s designated INA service
area (as defined below) compared to the
total number of unemployed Native
Americans living in the United States.
(2) Three-quarters of the funds will be
allocated based on the percentage of
Native Americans living in poverty in
the grantee’s designated INA service
area compared to the total number of
Native Americans living in poverty in
the United States.
A grantee’s designated INA service
area is the area identified by the DOL
Grant Officer in the grant award in
which the grant applicant will operate
an employment and training program
(usually a county or reservation area).
Grant applicants must specify the
geographic area(s) they wish to serve in
their grant application. The ETA uses
counties and tribal reservations, Alaska
Native villages and Alaska Native
regional corporations to identify areas of
service. The ETA used data from the
2000 Census to determine the number of
Native Americans in poverty and
unemployed for each service area.
Attachment C identifies the services
areas in competition for PY 2006–2007,
along with the number of Native
Americans in each geographic area who
are unemployed, in poverty, or in the
youth age bracket and the estimated
funding associated with each service
area.
Youth funding: Grant applicants
serving reservation areas and grantees
serving any area in the State of
Oklahoma also receive Supplemental
Youth Services (SYS) program funds.
Youth funds are appropriated annually
as stated in WIA at section
127(b)(1)(C)(i). Annual appropriations
for the SYS program have been
approximately $15,000,000, which has
been awarded to approximately 136
Native American grantees. The amounts
awarded under the SYS program in
2005 ranged from $1,315 to $2,706,072.
The median grant award amount was
$40,241. Youth award amounts for all
section 166 grantees can be found at:
https://www.doleta.gov/dinap/pdf/
SYSPholdHarmless.pdf.
PO 00000
Frm 00079
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
7581
The amount of youth funding a
grantee will receive is based on a
formula specified at 20 CFR 668.440.
The SYS Funding Formula is as follows:
SYS funding will be allocated to
grantees serving reservations (or areas in
the State of Oklahoma) based on the
percentage of Native American Youth
between the ages of 14 and 21 living in
poverty in the grantee’s designated INA
service area compared to the number of
Native American youth between the
ages of 14 and 21 living in poverty on
all reservation areas and the State of
Oklahoma.
Award amounts available for areas in
competition: Estimated funds to be
awarded for those areas in competition
are included in Attachment C.
III. Eligibility Information
1. Eligible Applicants
To be eligible for an award of funds
under WIA section 166 and this
solicitation, an entity must meet all
eligibility requirements of WIA section
166 and 20 CFR 668.200, as well as the
application and designation
requirements found at 20 CFR part 668,
subpart B. The Federal regulations can
be downloaded from the Internet at:
https://www.doleta.gov/dinap/pdf/
wiafinalregsall.pdf. Potential applicants
are expected to thoroughly review and
comply with the statute and regulations.
Organizations that are potentially
eligible to apply for WIA section 166
funds under this solicitation are:
• Federally recognized Indian Tribes
• Tribal organizations as defined in 25
U.S.C. 450b
• Alaskan Native-controlled
organizations representing regional or
village areas, as defined in the Alaska
Native Claims Settlement Act
• Native Hawaiian-controlled entities
• Native American-controlled
organizations serving Indians,
including community and faith-based
organizations (see definition of Native
American-controlled organizations
described below)
• State-recognized tribal organizations
serving individuals who were eligible
to participate under JTPA section 401,
as of August 6, 1998
• Consortia of eligible entities which
individually meet the legal
requirements for a consortium (see
definition of a consortium described
below). Additionally, to be eligible,
entities must have a legal status as a
government, an agency of a
government, a private non-profit
corporation (e.g., incorporated under
IRS section 501(c)(3), or a consortium
as defined below. Applicants seeking
to provide services in a geographic
E:\FR\FM\13FEN1.SGM
13FEN1
7582
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 29 / Monday, February 13, 2006 / Notices
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with NOTICES
service area for the first time must
satisfy the funding threshold
identified below.
Definition of Native AmericanControlled Organization: A Native
American-controlled organization is
defined as any organization for which
more than 50 percent of the governing
board members are Indians or Native
Americans. Such an organization can be
a tribal government, Native Alaska or
Native Hawaiian entity, consortium, or
public or private non-profit agency. For
the purpose of this award application,
the governing board must have decisionmaking authority for the WIA section
166 program.
Eligible consortium: Each member of
a consortium must individually meet
the requirement of an eligible applicant,
as defined in 20 CFR 668.200 (c), (that
is, be a federally recognized tribe, or
tribal organization, or Alaska Nativecontrolled organization, etc.) and at
least one of the consortia members must
have a legal status as a government, an
agency of a government or a private
non-profit corporation. Additionally,
the consortium must meet the following
conditions: (1) Have members in close
proximity to one another but not
necessarily in the same State; (2) have
an administrative unit legally
authorized to run the program and to
commit the other members to contracts,
grants, and other legally binding
agreements; and (3) be jointly and
individually responsible for the actions
and obligations of the consortium,
including debts.
Funding Thresholds: To be eligible for
funding, a new (non-incumbent) entity
must request one or more geographic
service areas in competition that contain
an eligible population of sufficient size
to result in a funding level of at least
$100,000 under the combined adult and
youth funding formulas. See
§ 668.200(a)(3). Current section 166
grantees that do not meet the $100,000
threshold are exempt from this
requirement. Federally-recognized tribes
currently receiving, or applying for WIA
section 166 funds under Public Law
102–477 only need to meet a $20,000
threshold, as long as the combined
funding under Public Law 102–477 is at
least $100,000. Attachment C provides
funding estimates for the geographic
areas in competition.
2. Cost Sharing or Matching
The section 166 program does not
require grantees to share costs or
provide matching funds.
3. Other Eligibility Criteria
In accordance with 29 CFR part 98,
entities that are debarred or suspended
VerDate Aug<31>2005
17:38 Feb 10, 2006
Jkt 208001
shall be excluded from Federal financial
assistance and are ineligible to receive
a section 166 grant.
Additionally the applicant must have
the ability to administer section 166
funds. The ability to administer section
166 funds is determined in accordance
with 20 CFR 668.220 and 668.230.
Limitations on those served under a
WIA section 166 grant are identified in
Part IV (5) of this SGA, ‘‘Funding
Restrictions.’’
Applicants should be aware that there
are specific program regulations and
OMB circulars that grantees must
adhere to upon receiving a section 166
grant. See Part IV (2) of this SGA below.
IV. Application and Submission
Information
1. Address to Request Application
Package
This SGA contains all of the
information needed to apply for grant
funding.
2. Content and Form of Application
Submission
Information that must be submitted
under this SGA will depend on the
applicant’s status with DOL/ETA. For
the purposes of this SGA, grant
applicants are divided into four
categories, each of which is addressed
separately below: (a) Current grantees
receiving a waiver from competition for
their service area, including those with
conditional designation (see listing in
Attachment A); (b) current grantees
operating a WIA section 166 grant under
Public Law 102–477 (see listing of 102–
477 grantees in Attachment B); (c)
current grantees not receiving waivers
from competition (see listing in
Attachment C); and (d) new applicants
(non-incumbent) for areas in
competition.
a. Current grantees receiving a waiver
from competition. Current grantees
receiving a waiver of competition, as
listed in Attachment A of this SGA, only
need to submit the following
documents:
• A brief cover letter informing ETA
of the organization’s interest in applying
for WIA section 166 funds, signed by an
authorized signatory official.
• A Standard Form (SF) 424 (Version
02). (See information regarding the
completion of the SF–424 below.)
If a current grantee with a competition
waiver for an existing service area
wishes to apply for additional
geographic service areas, the additional
service area(s) must be stated in item
#14 of the SF–424 and the procedures
in Section V of this SGA must be
followed to apply for grant funding for
PO 00000
Frm 00080
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
the additional area(s). A current grantee
that has received a waiver from
competition does not jeopardize its
existing service area by applying for
additional service areas nor does it
receive any preference for the additional
area.
b. Federally recognized tribes
applying for section 166 funds under
Public Law 102–477. Public Law 102–
477 authorizes WIA section 166 funds to
be awarded to federally recognized
tribes under a ‘‘consolidation’’ plan
administered through the U.S.
Department of Interior. Public Law 102–
477 allows federally-recognized tribes to
consolidate formula-funded
employment and training related funds
under a single, consolidated plan.
Grantees operating a WIA section 166
grant under Public Law 102–477, as
listed in Attachment B of this SGA, only
need to submit the following
documents:
• A brief cover letter informing ETA
of the organization’s interest in applying
for WIA section 166 funds, signed by an
authorized signatory official.
• A Standard Form (SF) 424 (Version
02). (See information regarding the
completion of the SF–424 below.)
These documents indicate their intent
to continue receiving section 166 funds.
Tribes wishing to apply for WIA section
166 funds under Public Law 102–477
should not apply under this solicitation.
Instead, tribes must submit a 477 plan
to the U.S. Department of Interior.
New tribal applicants should be aware
that in order for ETA to timely obligate
FY 2007, funds under Public Law 102–
477, a tribe’s 477 plan must be received
by the Department of Interior no later
than April 1, 2006, and approved no
later than June 30, 2006. For further
information on applying for WIA
section 166 funds under Public Law
102–477, please contact Athena R.
Brown, Chief, DINAP, at (202) 693–3737
(this is not a toll-free number).
c. Current grantees not receiving a
waiver from competition. Current
grantees not receiving a waiver from
competition, as listed in Attachment C
of this SGA, only need to submit the
following documents to initially express
interest in continuing to serve the
geographic service area placed in
competition:
• A brief cover letter informing the
ETA of the organization’s interest in
applying for WIA section 166 funds,
signed by an authorized signatory
official.
• A Standard Form (SF) 4249
(Version 02). (See information regarding
the completion of the SF 424 below.)
While these are the only documents
initially required, grantees not receiving
E:\FR\FM\13FEN1.SGM
13FEN1
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 29 / Monday, February 13, 2006 / Notices
a waiver should be aware that other
entities may apply for their geographic
service area(s). In cases where a new
applicant (or applicants) applies for a
current grantee’s service area (see
Attachment C), the Grant Officer will
notify the applicant that there is
competition for that service area no later
than 15 days after the SGA deadline
date. Upon such notification, the
applicant will be given 30 days from the
date of the notification to submit a
competitive grant proposal that
responds to the evaluation criteria
described in Part V(1) and that complies
with requirements for new applicants
under Part IV(2)(c) below (except that
current grantees need not provide
identification or proof of legal status,
unless it has changed since the entity’s
current grant award). Current grantees
not receiving a waiver may want to
prepare a competitive grant proposal in
advance of the notice of competition as
some portions (such as letters of
support) may take longer than the 15
days to prepare.
If there is no competition for a service
area currently served by a grantee that
did not receive a waiver, the Grant
Officer, in consultation with DINAP and
consistent with 20 CFR 668.210,
668.250, and 668.280, will make a
decision to continue funding to the
current grantee, or to designate the
service area to another WIA section 166
grantee that is willing to serve the area,
or to transfer funding into the formula
to be distributed among all WIA section
166 grantees.
d. New applicants for areas in
competition. New applicants must
submit a complete grant proposal that
addresses each of the evaluation criteria
indicated in Part V(1) of this SGA. The
proposal may not exceed twenty (20)
double-spaced, single-sided, 8.5 inch ×
11 inch pages with 12 point text font
and one inch margins. In addition, in
attachments which may not exceed 10
pages, the applicant may provide
resumes, a list of staff positions to be
funded by the grant, letters of support,
statistical information, and other related
material.
The proposal must include within the
20-page limit:
• A brief cover letter informing the
ETA of the organization’s interest in
applying for WIA section 166 funds,
signed by an authorized signatory
official.
• A Standard Form (SF) 424 (Version
02) (see information regarding the
completion of the SF–424 below).
• Identification of the applicant’s
legal status, including articles of
incorporation for non-profit
VerDate Aug<31>2005
17:38 Feb 10, 2006
Jkt 208001
organizations or consortium agreement
(if applicable).
• A specific description of the
geographic area (i.e., county or
reservation) being applied for. Only
areas placed in competition and
identified in Attachment C of this SGA
can be applied for. New applicants
should identify the area(s) they wish to
serve in item #14 of the SF–424.
Applicants may include service areas in
an attachment to the SF–424 if
additional space is needed.
Completing the Standard Form (SF) 424
(Version 02)
The SF–424 is available for
downloading at https://www.grants.gov.
The SF–424 must clearly identify the
applicant and be signed by an
individual with authority to enter into
a grant agreement. Upon confirmation of
an award, the individual signing the
SF–424 on behalf of the applicant shall
be considered the representative of the
applicant.
While the SF–424 requires general
information about an applicant,
applicants may not be familiar with
some required items, or the information
may not be readily available.
Explanations of these items are
provided below:
• Item #8(c)—Organization DUNS:
All applicants for Federal funds are
required to have a Dun and Bradstreet
(DUNS) number. The DUNS number is
a nine-digit identification number that
uniquely identifies business entities.
Obtaining a DUNS number is easy and
there is no charge. To obtain a DUNS
number access this website: https://
www.dunandbradstreet.com or call 1–
866–705–5711. Many organizations
already have a DUNS number.
Applicants should verify that their
organization does not already have a
DUNS number before obtaining a new
number.
• Item #11—Catalog of Federal
Domestic Assistance Number (CFDA):
The CFDA number for the WIA section
166 program is 17.265. This number
must be provided in item #11.
• Item #14—Areas Affected by
Project: Applicants must include the
specific geographic areas they wish to
serve (i.e., counties, reservations, etc.).
Current grantees that wish to serve their
existing service area and are not
applying for additional service areas
only need to indicate ‘‘Existing Service
Area’’ in this section. Current grantees
and new applicants requesting service
areas that are open to competition as
indicated in Attachment C of this SGA
must include the State, County, and
Reservation service area in line item 14.
Applicants may include service areas in
PO 00000
Frm 00081
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
7583
an attachment to the SF–424 if
additional space is needed.
• Item #17—Proposed Project Start
Date and Ending Date: The WIA section
166 program is funded for a two-year
period and is based on a program year
period of July 1 through June 30. The
proposed start date under this
solicitation is July 1, 2006, and the
proposed end date is June 30, 2008.
• Item #18—Estimated Funding: The
WIA section 166 program is a formula
funded program based on population
characteristics of geographic service
areas assigned to grantees and such
variables as the annual congressional
appropriations. Since WIA section 166
funding awards are calculated by the
DOL/ETA, it is not necessary for
applicants to complete Item #18.
However, current grantees can view
their estimated funding which has been
calculated by the DOL/ETA through
2010, at this website: https://
www.doleta.gov/dinap/cfml/
CensusData.cfm. Please note that the
funding amounts located at the Web
sites above are estimates based on the
Fiscal Year 2004, congressional
appropriation. Funding estimates for
those areas in competition are included
in Attachment C.
• Item #19—Is application Subject to
Review by State Under Executive Order
12372 process? The WIA section 166
program is not subject to Executive
Order 12372.
All applicants (except for current Pub.
L. 102–477 grantees) may submit their
applications on https://www.grants.gov
with authorized electronic signatures.
This will be accepted in place of the
hard copy cover letter and SF–424. New
applicants must submit hard copies of
other required documents.
3. Submission Date, Times, and
Addresses
All applications may be submitted
electronically on https://www.grants.gov
or in hard-copy via mail or hand
delivery. Applicants submitting
proposals in hard-copy must submit an
original signed application, SF–424 (all
new applicants must also submit a SF–
424A, Budget Form) and one (1) ‘‘copyready’’ version. Do not bind, staple, or
insert protruding tabs.
The closing date for receipt of
applications under this announcement
is by 5 p.m. (eastern time), 30 days after
the date of publication. Applications
must be received at the address below
no later than 5 p.m. (eastern time).
Applications sent by e-mail, telegram, or
facsimile (fax) will not be accepted.
Applications that do not meet the
conditions set forth in this notice will
not be considered. No exceptions to the
E:\FR\FM\13FEN1.SGM
13FEN1
7584
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 29 / Monday, February 13, 2006 / Notices
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with NOTICES
mailing and delivery requirements set
forth in this notice will be granted.
Mailed applications must be
addressed to the U.S. Department of
Labor, Employment and Training
Administration, Division of Federal
Assistance, Attention: James Stockton,
Grant Officer, Reference SGA/DFA–PY–
05–05, 200 Constitution Avenue, NW.,
Room N–4716, Washington, DC 20210.
Applicants are advised that mail
delivery in the Washington area may be
delayed due to mail decontamination
procedures. Hand delivered proposals
will be received at the above address.
All overnight mail will be considered to
be hand-delivered and must be received
at the designated place by the specified
closing date and time. Proposals
submitted on diskette or CD are not
encouraged as decontamination
procedures may cause damage.
For those applying online through
https://www.grants.gov, it is strongly
recommended that applicants
immediately initiate and complete the
‘‘Get Started’’ registration steps at https://
www.grants.gov/GetStarted. These steps
may take multiple days to complete, and
this time should be factored into plans
for electronic application submission in
order to avoid facing unexpected delays
that could result in the rejection of an
application. If submitting electronically
through https://www.grants.gov, it would
be appreciated if the application
submitted is saved as .doc, .pdf, or .txt
files. Applications submitted online,
with authorized electronic signatures,
are acceptable, in lieu of the brief cover
letter with signature.
Late Applications: Any application
received after the exact date and time
specified for receipt at the office
designated in this notice will not be
considered, unless it is received before
awards are made and it (a) was sent by
U.S. Postal Service registered or
certified mail not later than the fifth
calendar day before the date specified
for receipt of applications (e.g., an
application received after the deadline,
but having a U.S. postmark showing an
early submittal will not be considered
late if received before awards are made),
or (b) was sent by U.S. Postal Service
Express Mail or https://www.grants.gov
to the addressee not later than 5 p.m. at
the place of mailing or electronic
submission one working day prior to the
date specified for receipt of
applications. It is highly recommended
that online submissions be completed
one working day prior to the date
specified for receipt of applications to
ensure that the applicant still has the
option to submit by U.S. Postal Service
Express Mail in the event of any
electronic submission problems. ‘‘Post
marked’’ means a printed, stamped, or
otherwise placed impression (exclusive
of a postage meter machine impression)
that is readily identifiable, without
further action, as having been supplied
or affixed on the date of mailing by an
employee of the U.S. Postal Service.
Therefore, applicants should request the
postal clerk to place a legible hand
cancellation ‘‘bull’s eye’’ postmark on
both the receipt and the package.
Failure to adhere to the above
instructions will be a basis for a
determination of non-responsiveness.
Note: Except as specifically provided in
this Notice, DOL/ETA’s acceptance of a
proposal and an award of Federal funds to
sponsor any program(s) does not provide a
waiver of any grant requirements and/or
procedures. For example, OMB Circulars
require that an entity’s procurement
procedures must ensure that all procurement
transactions are conducted, as much as
practical, to provide open and free
competition. If a proposal identifies a
specific entity to provide services, the DOL/
ETA’s award does not provide the
justification or basis to sole source the
procurement, i.e., avoid competition, unless
the activity is regarded as the primary work
of an official partner to the application.
Important: Organizations seeking WIA
section 166 funding for this period must
comply with the provisions of this SGA.
Late applications from current grantees
or new applicants will not be
considered for those geographic service
areas that are in competition (as listed
in Attachment C).
4. Intergovernmental Review
This funding opportunity is not
subject to Executive Order (EO) 12372
‘‘Intergovernmental Review of Federal
Programs.’’
5. Funding Restrictions
Allowable costs. Determinations of
allowable costs will be made in
accordance with the applicable Federal
cost principles, e.g., for tribes, OMB
Circular A–87, for non-profit
organizations, OMB Circular A–122. See
20 CFR 668.810 and 668.840
(incorporating WIA cost rules at 20 CFR
667.200 to 667.220). Disallowed costs
are those charges to a grant that the
grantor agency or its representative
determines not to be allowable in
accordance with the applicable Federal
Cost Principles or other conditions
contained in the grant. The WIA section
166 program limits administrative costs
to 15% but may be negotiated up to
20% upon approval from the grantor
agency. There are no specific limits on
indirect costs; however, since most
indirect costs are considered
administrative costs, the amount of
indirect cost collected, regardless of the
approved rate, may be limited by the
overall administrative cost limit. WIA
funds must not be spent on construction
or purchase of facilities or buildings
except in specific circumstances
specified at section 667.260.
Limitation on the type of individuals
served: The regulations at 20 CFR
668.300(a) limit eligibility for WIA
section 166 program services to Native
Americans as determined by a policy of
the Native American grantee, Alaska
Natives, and Native Hawaiians. Those
receiving services must also, under
§ 668.300(b), be either low income,
unemployed, underemployed as defined
in 20 CFR 668.150, a recipient of a bona
fide layoff notice which has taken effect
in the last six months or will take effect
in the following six month period, or
employed persons in need of
employment and training services to
achieve self-sufficiency. Grantees must
ensure that all eligible population
members have equitable access to
employment and training services. See
20 CFR 668.650(a). Priority of services
must be given to veterans and spouses
of certain veterans in accordance with
the provisions of the ‘‘Jobs for Veterans
Act,’’ Public Law 107–288. Since all
individuals served by the section 166
program must be Native American,
Alaska Native, or Native Hawaiian, so
must the veterans receiving priority
under the ‘‘Jobs for Veterans Act’’ be
Native American, Alaska Native, or
Native Hawaiian.
V. Application Review Information
1. Evaluation Criteria
The factors listed below will be
considered in evaluating the applicants’
approach to providing services and their
ability to produce the best outcomes for
covered individuals residing in the
service area.
2. Review and Selection Process
Evaluation criteria
Points
A.i. Previous experience or demonstrated capabilities in successfully operating an employment and training program established for
and serving Indians and Native Americans .............................................................................................................................................
VerDate Aug<31>2005
17:38 Feb 10, 2006
Jkt 208001
PO 00000
Frm 00082
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
E:\FR\FM\13FEN1.SGM
13FEN1
20
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 29 / Monday, February 13, 2006 / Notices
Evaluation criteria
Points
ii. Previous experience in operating or coordinating with other human resources development programs serving Indians and Native
Americans. Applicant should describe other successful Federal, State, or private foundation grants that the applicant has operated
in the last two years .................................................................................................................................................................................
iii. Demonstration of coordination and linkages with Indian and non-Indian employment and training resources within the community
B.i. Description of the entity’s planning process and demonstration of involvement with the INA community ..........................................
ii. Approach to providing services, including identification of the training and employment problems and needs in the requested area,
and approach to addressing such needs ................................................................................................................................................
C.i. Demonstration of involvement with local employers and efforts that have been made to link unemployed Native Americans with
employers. Applicant should also describe involvement with local Workforce Investment Boards, or if applicable, youth programs,
and/or councils .........................................................................................................................................................................................
ii. Applicants should describe efforts that have been made to coordinate their human resource services described under Criteria A(ii)
with State Operated One-Step delivery systems .....................................................................................................................................
D. Demonstration of support and recognition by the Native American Community and service population, including local tribes and
adjacent Indian organizations and the client populations to be served ..................................................................................................
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with NOTICES
Maximum Available Points ...................................................................................................................................................................
Overall Review Process. Where two or
more entities apply for the same service
area that has been placed in
competition, DOL’s Division of Indian
and Native American Programs
(DINAP), with the concurrence of the
Grant Officer, will conduct an initial
review of the applications for
compliance with the statute,
regulations, and this SGA. The initial
review will consider, among other
things, timeliness and completeness of
submission, applicant eligibility,
eligibility of the requested service area,
population size, and funding thresholds
as described in Part III (1) of this SGA.
Applications that do not satisfy these
conditions will not be considered.
The review will also consider any
designation priority, as described in the
next paragraph, and compliance with
financial responsibility criteria, in
accordance with 20 CFR 668.220 and
668.230, to ensure that applicants are
capable of properly handling and
accounting for Federal funds.
Organizations with no prior grant
history with the Department, or about
whom there are financial or grant
management concerns, may be
conditionally designated pending an onsite review and/or a six-month
assessment of program progress.
The Grant Officer is not required to
adhere to the geographical service area
requested by an applicant. The Grant
Officer may make a designation of all
the area requested, or, if acceptable to
the applicant, a portion of the area
requested or more than the area
requested.
Designation Priority. In nonreservation areas placed in competition,
consistent with 20 CFR 668.210(c),
priority for designation will be given to
entities with a Native Americancontrolled governing body and which
are representative of the Native
American community or communities
that they are applying to serve.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
17:38 Feb 10, 2006
Jkt 208001
Competitive Selection Procedures. If
two or more applicants satisfy the initial
review described above, for a geographic
area identified in Attachment C that is
open to competition under this SGA,
then a competitive selection will be
made following the procedures in this
section and applying the designation
priority noted above. When competitive
selection is necessary, DINAP will
notify each applicant of the competing
Notices of Intent no later than 15 days
after the application deadline date.
Upon notification of competition,
current grantees will be given 30 days
from the date of notification to submit
a complete proposal, as specified in Part
IV (2)(c).
Where a competitive evaluation is
required, the Grant Officer will use a
formal panel review process to score
proposals and any supporting
attachments against the evaluation
criteria listed in Part V (1). The review
panel will include individuals with
knowledge of or expertise in programs
dealing with Indians and Native
Americans. The purpose of the panel is
to review and evaluate an organization’s
potential, based on its application, to
provide services to a specific Native
American community, and submit
recommendations to the Grant Officer.
It is DOL’s policy that no information
affecting the panel review process will
be solicited or accepted after the
deadlines for receipt of applications set
forth in this SGA. All submitted
information must be in writing. This
policy does not preclude the Grant
Officer from requesting, or considering,
additional information independent of
the panel review process. During the
review, the panel will not give weight
to undocumented assertions. Any
information must be supported by
adequate and verifiable documentation,
e.g., supporting references must contain
the name of the contact person, an
address, and telephone number. Panel
PO 00000
Frm 00083
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
7585
10
10
20
10
10
10
10
100
ratings and recommendations are
advisory to the Grant Officer.
Determination of Designation-Scoring.
The Grant Officer will make the final
determination of section 166 designees
and of the geographic service area for
which each designation is made. The
Grant Officer will select the entity that
demonstrates the ability to produce the
best outcomes for its customers, based
on all available evidence and in
consideration of any designation
priorities as described in above. In
addition to considering the review
panel’s rating in those instances in
which a panel is convened, the Grant
Officer may consider any other available
information regarding the applicants’
financial and administrative capability,
operational capability, and
responsibility in order to make funding
determinations that are advantageous to
the government.
The Grant Officer need not designate
an entity for every geographic area. See
20 CFR 668.294. If there are service
areas in competition for which no entity
submitted a complete application or for
which no entity achieved a score of at
least 70, the Grant Officer may either
designate no service provider or may
designate an entity based on
demonstrated capability to provide the
best services to the client population.
DOL reserves the rights to select
applicants with scores lower than 70 or
lower than competing applications if
such selection would, in DOL’s
judgment, result in the most effective
and appropriate combination of services
to the client population, funding, and
costs.
An applicant that does not receive
WIA 166 funding, in whole or in part,
as a result of this process, will be
afforded the opportunity to appeal the
Grant Officer’s decision as provided at
20 CFR 668.270.
E:\FR\FM\13FEN1.SGM
13FEN1
7586
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 29 / Monday, February 13, 2006 / Notices
3. Anticipated Announcement and
Award Dates
If possible, designation decisions will
be made by March 1, 2006.
VI. Award Administration Information
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with NOTICES
1. Award Notices
The Grant Officer, Mr. James
Stockton, will notify applicants of the
results of their application as follows:
Designation Award Letter. The
designation award letter signed by the
Grant Officer will serve as official notice
that the applicant has been awarded
WIA section 166 funding. The
designation award letter will include
the geographic service area for which
the designation is made.
Conditional Designation Award
Letter. Conditional award designations
will include identification of the
geographic service area, the nature of
the conditions, and the actions required
for the applicant to be removed from
conditional award status and the time
frame in which such actions must be
accomplished.
Non-Designation Award Letter. Any
organization not receiving a designated
award, in whole or in part, for a
requested geographic service area that is
in competition (as identified in
Attachment C) will be notified formally
of the non-award designation.
Notification by a person or entity,
other than the Grant Officer that an
applicant has been awarded WIA
section 166 funds is not valid.
2. Administrative and National Policy
Requirements
Applicants that are awarded WIA
section 166 funds and become a Grantee
of the ETA must comply with the
provisions of WIA and its regulations.
Particular attention should be given to
part 668 of Title 20 of the Code of
Federal Regulations (published in the
Federal Register August 11, 2000),
which focuses specifically on programs
for Indians and Native Americans under
WIA. In addition, all grants will be
subject to the following administrative
standards and provisions, as applicable
to the particular grantee:
• 20 CFR part 667—Administrative
provisions under Title I of WIA
• 29 CFR part 2, subpart D—Equal
Treatment in Department of Labor
Programs for Religious Organizations;
Protection of Religious Liberty of
Department of Labor Social Service
Providers and Beneficiaries
• 29 CFR parts 30, 31, 32, 33, 35 and
36—Equal Employment Opportunity
in Apprenticeship and Training;
VerDate Aug<31>2005
17:38 Feb 10, 2006
Jkt 208001
Nondiscrimination in Federally
Assisted Programs of the Department
of Labor—Effectuation of Title VI of
the Civil Rights Act of 1964;
Nondiscrimination on the Basis of
Handicap in Programs or Activities
Conducted by the Department of
Labor; Nondiscrimination on the
Basis of Age in Programs or Activities
Receiving Federal Financial
Assistance from the Department of
Labor; and Nondiscrimination on the
Basis of Sex in Education Programs
Receiving or Benefiting from Federal
Financial Assistance
• 29 CFR part 37—Implementation of
the Nondiscrimination and Equal
Opportunity Provisions of the
Workforce Investment Act of 1998
(WIA)
• 29 CFR part 93—Lobbying
• 29 CFR part 95—Uniform
Administrative Requirements for
Grants and Agreements with
Institutions of Higher Education,
Hospitals, and Other Non-Profit
Organizations, and with Commercial
Organizations
• 29 CFR part 96—Federal Standards
for Audit of Federally Funded Grants,
Contracts, and Agreements
• 29 CFR part 97 Uniform
Administrative Requirements for
Grants and Cooperative Agreements to
State and Local Governments
• 29 CFR part 98—Government-wide
Debarment and Suspension (NonProcurement) and Government-wide
Requirements for Drug-Free
Workplace (Grants)
• 29 CFR part 99—Audit of States,
Local Governments, and Non-Profit
Organizations
In accordance with WIA Section
195(6) and 20 CFR 668.630(f), programs
funded under this SGA may not involve
political activities. Additionally, in
accordance with Section 18 of the
Lobbying Disclosure Act of 1995, Public
Law 104–65 (2 U.S.C. 1611), non-profit
entities incorporated under 501(c)(4)
that engage in lobbying activities are not
eligible to receive Federal funds and
grants. Further, this program is subject
to the provisions of the ‘‘Jobs for
Veterans Act,’’ Public Law 107–288,
which provides priority of service to
veterans and spouses of certain veterans
for the receipt of employment, training,
and placement services in any job
training program directly funded, in
whole or in part, by the Department of
Labor. Please note that, to obtain
priority of service, a veteran must meet
the program’s eligibility requirements.
ETA Training and Employment
PO 00000
Frm 00084
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Guidance Letter (TEGL) No. 5–03
(September 16, 2003) provides guidance
on the scope of the veterans priority
statute and its effect on current
employment training programs.
3. Reporting
Applicants that are awarded WIA
section 166 funds and become a grantee
of the ETA will be required to submit
reports on financial expenditures,
program participation, and participant
outcomes on no more than a quarterly
basis and in accordance with ETAspecified formats, deadlines, and other
requirements. The ETA will be
modifying program reports for the WIA
section 166 program to reflect OMB
Common Measures which will take
effect beginning July 1, 2006. Grantee
performance will be evaluated against
the Common Measures on an annual
basis.
VII. Agency Contacts
Questions regarding this SGA can be
directed to: Serena Boyd, Grants
Management Specialist, e-mail:
boyd.serena@dol.gov; (202) 693–3338;
FAX: (202) 693–2879 (this is not a tollfree number).
VIII. Other Information
Potential applicants may obtain
further information on the WIA section
166 program for employment and
training of Native Americans through
the website for DOL’s Division of Indian
and Native American Programs: https://
www.doleta.gov/dinap/. Any
information submitted in response to
this SGA will be subject to the
provisions of the Privacy Act and the
Freedom of Information Act, as
appropriate. The Department of Labor is
not obligated to make any awards as a
result of this SGA, and only the Grant
Officer can bind the Department to the
provision of funds under WIA section
166. Unless specifically provided in the
grant agreement, DOL’s acceptance of a
proposal and/or award of Federal funds
does not waive any grant requirements
and/or procedures.
Signed at Washington, DC, this 6th day of
February 2006.
Emily Stover DeRocco,
Assistant Secretary, Employment and
Training Administration.
Attachment A—Current Grantees Receiving
Waivers
Attachment B—Public Law 102–477 Grantees
Receiving Waivers
Attachment C—Current Grantees Not
Receiving Waivers and Associated
Geographic Areas
E:\FR\FM\13FEN1.SGM
13FEN1
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 29 / Monday, February 13, 2006 / Notices
ATTACHMENT A.—CURRENT GRANTEES RECEIVING WAIVERS
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with NOTICES
State
Grantee name
Alabama .......................................
Alabama .......................................
Alaska ..........................................
Alaska ..........................................
Alaska ..........................................
Alaska ..........................................
Arizona .........................................
Arizona .........................................
Arizona .........................................
Arizona .........................................
Arizona .........................................
Arizona .........................................
Arizona .........................................
Arizona .........................................
Arizona .........................................
Arizona .........................................
Arizona .........................................
Arizona .........................................
Arizona .........................................
Arizona .........................................
Arizona .........................................
Arizona* .......................................
Arkansas ......................................
California ......................................
California ......................................
California ......................................
California ......................................
California ......................................
California ......................................
California ......................................
California ......................................
Colorado ......................................
Colorado ......................................
Delaware ......................................
Florida ..........................................
Florida ..........................................
Hawaii ..........................................
Indiana .........................................
Kansas .........................................
Louisiana ......................................
Maine ...........................................
Massachusetts .............................
Massachusetts .............................
Michigan .......................................
Michigan .......................................
Michigan .......................................
Michigan .......................................
Michigan .......................................
Minnesota ....................................
Minnesota* ...................................
Minnesota ....................................
Minnesota ....................................
Minnesota ....................................
Mississippi ....................................
Missouri ........................................
Montana .......................................
Montana .......................................
Montana .......................................
Montana .......................................
Montana .......................................
Montana .......................................
Nebraska ......................................
Nebraska* ....................................
Nevada .........................................
Nevada .........................................
New Mexico .................................
New Mexico .................................
New Mexico .................................
New Mexico .................................
New Mexico .................................
New Mexico .................................
New Mexico .................................
VerDate Aug<31>2005
17:38 Feb 10, 2006
Inter-Tribal Council of Alabama
Poarch Band of Creek Indians
Ilisagvik College
Kenaitze Indian Tribe
Maniilaq Association
Tanana Chiefs Conference
Affiliation of Arizona Indian Centers, Inc.
American Indian Association of Tucson
Colorado River Indian Tribes
Gila River Indian Community
Hopi Tribal Council
Hualapai Tribe
Inter-Tribal Council of Arizona, Incorporated
Native Americans for Community Action, Inc.
Navajo Nation
Pascua Yaqui Tribe
Phoenix Indian Center, Inc.
Quechan Indian Tribe
Salt River Pima-Maricopa Indian Community
San Carlos Apache Tribe
Tohono O odham Nation
White Mountain Apache Tribe
American Indian Center of Arkansas, Inc.
California Indian Manpower Consortium
Candelaria American Indian Council
Indian Human Resources Center
Northern California Indian Development Council, Inc.
Southern California Indian Center, Inc.
Tule River Tribal Council
United Indian Nations, Inc.
Ya-Ka-Ama Indian Education and Development, Inc.
Southern Ute Indian Tribe
Ute Mountain Ute Tribe
Nanticoke Indian Association, Inc.
Florida Governors Council on Indian Affairs, Inc.
Miccosukee Tribe of Indians of Florida
Alu Like, Inc.
American Indian Center of Indiana, Inc.
United Tribes of Kansas and Southeast Nebraska, Inc.
Inter-Tribal Council of Louisiana, Inc.
Penobscot Nation
Mashpee-Wampanoag Indian Tribal Council, Inc.
North American Indian Center of Boston, Inc.
Grand Traverse Band of Ottawa and Chippewa Indians
Inter-Tribal Council of Michigan, Inc.
Michigan Indian Employment and Training Services, Inc.
Pokagon Band of Potawatomi Indians
Sault Ste. Marie Tribe of Chippewa Indians
American Indian Opportunities, Inc.
Bois Forte Reservation Tribal Council
Fond Du Lac Reservation
Leech Lake Band of Ojibwe
Minneapolis American Indian Center
Mississippi Band of Choctaw Indians
American Indian Council
Assiniboine and Sioux Tribes
B.C. of The Chippewa Cree Tribe
Blackfeet Tribal Business Council
Crow Tribe of Indians
Montana United Indian Association
Northern Cheyenne Tribe
Indian Center, Inc.
Omaha Tribe of Nebraska
Inter-Tribal Council of Nevada, Inc.
Las Vegas Indian Center, Inc.
Alamo Navajo School Board
Eight Northern Indian Pueblo Council
Five Sandoval Indian Pueblos, Inc.
Jicarilla Apache Tribe
Mescalero Apache Tribe
National Indian Youth Council
Pueblo of Acoma
Jkt 208001
PO 00000
Frm 00085
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
E:\FR\FM\13FEN1.SGM
13FEN1
7587
7588
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 29 / Monday, February 13, 2006 / Notices
ATTACHMENT A.—CURRENT GRANTEES RECEIVING WAIVERS—Continued
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with NOTICES
State
Grantee name
New Mexico .................................
New Mexico .................................
New Mexico .................................
New Mexico .................................
New Mexico .................................
New York .....................................
New York .....................................
New York .....................................
New York .....................................
North Carolina ..............................
North Carolina ..............................
North Carolina ..............................
North Carolina ..............................
North Carolina ..............................
North Carolina ..............................
North Carolina ..............................
North Dakota ................................
North Dakota ................................
North Dakota ................................
Ohio .............................................
Oklahoma .....................................
Oklahoma .....................................
Oklahoma .....................................
Oklahoma* ...................................
Oklahoma .....................................
Oklahoma .....................................
Oklahoma .....................................
Oklahoma .....................................
Oklahoma .....................................
Oklahoma .....................................
Oklahoma .....................................
Oklahoma .....................................
Oklahoma .....................................
Oklahoma .....................................
Oregon .........................................
Oregon .........................................
Oregon .........................................
Pennsylvania ................................
Rhode Island ................................
South Carolina .............................
South Dakota ...............................
South Dakota* ..............................
South Dakota ...............................
South Dakota* ..............................
Texas ...........................................
Texas ...........................................
Texas ...........................................
Utah .............................................
Utah .............................................
Vermont .......................................
Virginia .........................................
Washington ..................................
Washington ..................................
Washington ..................................
Washington ..................................
Washington ..................................
Washington ..................................
Washington ..................................
Washington ..................................
Wisconsin .....................................
Wisconsin .....................................
Wisconsin .....................................
Wisconsin .....................................
Wyoming ......................................
Pueblo of Isleta
Pueblo of Taos
Ramah Navajo School Board, Inc.
Santa Clara Indian Pueblo Tribal Government
Santo Domingo Tribe
American Indian Community House, Inc.
Native American Community Services of Erie and Niagara
Native American Cultural Center, Inc.
St. Regis Mohawk Tribe
Cumberland County Association for Indian People, Inc.
Eastern Band of Cherokee Indians
Guilford Native American Association
Haliwa-Saponi Tribe, Inc.
Lumbee Regional Development Association, Inc.
Metrolina Native American Association
North Carolina Commission on Indian Affairs
Standing Rock Sioux Tribe
Turtle Mountain Band of Chippewa Indians
United Tribes Technical College
North American Indian Cultural Center, Inc.
Absentee Shawnee Tribe
Cheyenne Arapaho Tribes of Oklahoma
Choctaw Nation of Oklahoma
Comanche Tribe of Oklahoma
Creek Nation of Oklahoma
Four Tribes Consortium of Oklahoma
Inter-Tribal Council of Northeast Oklahoma
Kiowa Tribe of Oklahoma
Native American Resource Center, Inc.
Otoe-Missouria Tribe
Ponca Tribe of Oklahoma
Seminole Nation of Oklahoma
Tonkawa Tribe of Oklahoma
United Urban Indian Council, Inc.
Confederated Tribes of The Umatilla Indian Reservation
Confederated Tribes of Warm Springs
Organization of Forgotten Americans, Inc.
Council of Three Rivers American Indian Center, Inc.
Rhode Island Indian Council, Inc.
South Carolina Indian Development Council, Inc.
Lower Brule Sioux Tribe
Oglala Sioux Tribe
United Sioux Tribes of South Dakota Development
Yankton Sioux Tribe
Alabama-Coushatta Indian Tribal Council
Dallas Inter-Tribal Center
Ysleta Del Sur Pueblo
Indian Training and Education Center
Ute Indian Tribe
Abenaki Self-Help Association/N.H. Indian Council
Mattaponi Pamunkey Monacan Consortium
American Indian Community Center
Confederated Tribes and Bands of the Yakama Nation
Lummi Indian Business Council
Makah Tribal Council
Puyallup Tribe of Indians
Seattle Indian Center, Inc.
The Tulalip Tribes
Western Washington Indian Employment and Training
Lac Courte Oreilles Tribal Governing Board
Lac Du Flambeau Band of Lake Superior Chippewa Indians, Inc.
Spotted Eagle, Inc.
Wisconsin Indian Consortium
Northern Arapahoe Business Council
Total Grantees Receiving Waivers: 136.
*Current grantees to receive conditional designation.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
17:38 Feb 10, 2006
Jkt 208001
PO 00000
Frm 00086
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
E:\FR\FM\13FEN1.SGM
13FEN1
7589
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 29 / Monday, February 13, 2006 / Notices
ATTACHMENT B.—PUBLIC LAW 102–477 GRANTEES RECEIVING WAIVERS
State
Grantee name
Alaska ..........................................
Alaska ..........................................
Alaska ..........................................
Alaska ..........................................
Alaska ..........................................
Alaska ..........................................
Alaska ..........................................
Alaska ..........................................
Alaska ..........................................
Alaska ..........................................
Alaska ..........................................
Florida ..........................................
Idaho ............................................
Idaho ............................................
Minnesota ....................................
Minnesota ....................................
Minnesota ....................................
Montana .......................................
Montana .......................................
Nebraska ......................................
Nevada .........................................
Nevada .........................................
New Mexico .................................
New Mexico .................................
New York .....................................
North Dakota ................................
North Dakota ................................
Oklahoma .....................................
Oklahoma .....................................
Oklahoma .....................................
Oklahoma .....................................
Oklahoma .....................................
Oregon .........................................
South Dakota ...............................
South Dakota ...............................
South Dakota ...............................
Washington ..................................
Wisconsin .....................................
Wisconsin .....................................
Wisconsin .....................................
Wyoming ......................................
Aleutian-Pribilof Islands Assn., Inc.
Association of Village Council Presidents
Bristol Bay Native Association
Central Council of Tlingit and Haida Indian Tribes
Chugachmiut
Cook Inlet Tribal Council, Inc.
Copper River Native Association
Kawerak Incorporated
Kodiak Area Native Association
Metlakatla Indian Community
Orutsararmuit Native Council
Seminole Tribe of Florida
Nez Perce Tribe
Shoshone-Bannock Tribes, Inc.
Mille Lacs Band of Ojibwe Indians
Red Lake Tribal Council
White Earth Reservation Tribal Council
Confederated Salish & Kootenai Tribes
Fort Belknap Indian Community
Winnebago Tribe of Nebraska
Reno Sparks Indian Colony
Shoshone-Paiute Tribes
Pueblo of Laguna
Pueblo of Zuni
Seneca Nation of Indians
Spirit Lake Sioux Tribe
Three Affiliated Tribes
Cherokee Nation of Oklahoma
Chickasaw Nation
Citizens Potawatomi Nation
Osage Nation
Pawnee Nation of Oklahoma
Confederated Tribes of Siletz Indians
Cheyenne River Sioux Tribe
Sicangu Nation (Rosebud Sioux Tribe)
Sisseton-Wahpeton Sioux Tribe
Confederated Tribes of the Colville Reservation
Ho-Chunk Nation
Menominee Indian Tribe of Wisconsin
Stockbridge-Munsee Community
Eastern Shoshone Tribe
Total Public Law 102–477 Grantees Receiving Waivers: 41.
ATTACHMENT C.—CURRENT GRANTEES NOT RECEIVING WAIVERS AND ASSOCIATED GEOGRAPHIC AREAS
Unemployed
Poverty
Youth
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with NOTICES
State: Colorado
Grantee: Denver Indian Center, Inc.
Adams County .........................................................................................................................................
Alamosa County ......................................................................................................................................
Arapahoe County .....................................................................................................................................
Baca County ............................................................................................................................................
Bent County .............................................................................................................................................
Boulder County ........................................................................................................................................
Chaffee County ........................................................................................................................................
Cheyenne County ....................................................................................................................................
Clear Creek County .................................................................................................................................
Conejos County .......................................................................................................................................
Costilla County .........................................................................................................................................
Crowley County .......................................................................................................................................
Custer County ..........................................................................................................................................
Delta County ............................................................................................................................................
Denver County .........................................................................................................................................
Dolores County ........................................................................................................................................
Douglas County .......................................................................................................................................
Eagle County ...........................................................................................................................................
El Paso County ........................................................................................................................................
Elbert County ...........................................................................................................................................
Fremont County .......................................................................................................................................
VerDate Aug<31>2005
17:38 Feb 10, 2006
Jkt 208001
PO 00000
Frm 00087
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
E:\FR\FM\13FEN1.SGM
135
25
135
0
0
40
0
0
0
4
20
4
4
0
475
4
20
0
170
4
15
13FEN1
390
55
340
10
4
385
15
4
15
115
35
25
20
10
1955
20
30
10
590
10
70
90
4
60
4
0
105
0
4
4
15
4
4
4
0
370
4
4
0
85
0
10
7590
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 29 / Monday, February 13, 2006 / Notices
ATTACHMENT C.—CURRENT GRANTEES NOT RECEIVING WAIVERS AND ASSOCIATED GEOGRAPHIC AREAS—Continued
Unemployed
Garfield County ........................................................................................................................................
Gilpin County ...........................................................................................................................................
Grand County ..........................................................................................................................................
Gunnison County .....................................................................................................................................
Hinsdale County ......................................................................................................................................
Huerfano County ......................................................................................................................................
Jackson County .......................................................................................................................................
Jefferson County ......................................................................................................................................
Kiowa County ...........................................................................................................................................
Kit Carson County ...................................................................................................................................
Lake County .............................................................................................................................................
Larimer County ........................................................................................................................................
Las Animas County .................................................................................................................................
Lincoln County .........................................................................................................................................
Logan County ..........................................................................................................................................
Mesa County ............................................................................................................................................
Morgan County ........................................................................................................................................
Otero County ...........................................................................................................................................
Ouray County ...........................................................................................................................................
Park County .............................................................................................................................................
Phillips County .........................................................................................................................................
Pitkin County ............................................................................................................................................
Prowers County .......................................................................................................................................
Pueblo County .........................................................................................................................................
Rio Blanco County ...................................................................................................................................
Rio Grande County ..................................................................................................................................
Routt County ............................................................................................................................................
Saguache County ....................................................................................................................................
San Juan County .....................................................................................................................................
San Miguel County ..................................................................................................................................
Sedgwick County .....................................................................................................................................
Summit County ........................................................................................................................................
Teller County ...........................................................................................................................................
Washington County .................................................................................................................................
Weld County ............................................................................................................................................
Yuma County ...........................................................................................................................................
PY 2006 Adult Funding Estimate: $605,530.
PY 2007 Adult Funding Estimate: $609,946.
No Youth Funding.
Poverty
Youth
10
0
0
0
0
20
0
135
4
4
4
95
10
0
15
25
20
15
0
4
0
4
0
100
4
0
0
4
0
10
0
0
10
4
80
0
60
0
4
10
4
95
0
550
4
4
0
335
185
4
10
280
25
95
10
20
4
4
25
520
10
30
4
25
4
4
0
0
0
4
240
0
10
0
0
0
0
20
0
120
0
0
0
165
10
0
0
90
10
10
0
0
0
0
4
60
0
20
0
4
4
0
0
0
0
0
50
0
4
20
4
0
4
30
0
0
0
0
4
0
10
4
0
0
4
4
4
205
0
10
10
45
90
0
30
125
10
0
15
0
4
0
45
4
4
0
55
15
35
830
4
35
10
10
0
0
10
20
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
10
15
125
0
4
365
1515
145
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with NOTICES
State: Kansas
Grantee: Mid-American All Indian Center, Inc.
Barber County ..........................................................................................................................................
Barton County ..........................................................................................................................................
Butler County ...........................................................................................................................................
Chase County ..........................................................................................................................................
Chautauqua County .................................................................................................................................
Cowley County .........................................................................................................................................
Elk County ...............................................................................................................................................
Ellsworth County ......................................................................................................................................
Greenwood County ..................................................................................................................................
Harper County .........................................................................................................................................
Harvey County .........................................................................................................................................
Kingman County ......................................................................................................................................
Lyon County .............................................................................................................................................
Marion County .........................................................................................................................................
McPherson County ..................................................................................................................................
Pratt County .............................................................................................................................................
Reno County ............................................................................................................................................
Rice County .............................................................................................................................................
Saline County ..........................................................................................................................................
Sedgwick County .....................................................................................................................................
Stafford County ........................................................................................................................................
Sumner County ........................................................................................................................................
PY 2006 Adult Funding Estimate: $121,690.
PY 2007 Adult Funding Estimate: $118,558.
No Youth Funding.
State: Michigan
Grantee: North American Indian Association of Detroit, Inc.
Wayne County .........................................................................................................................................
VerDate Aug<31>2005
17:38 Feb 10, 2006
Jkt 208001
PO 00000
Frm 00088
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
E:\FR\FM\13FEN1.SGM
13FEN1
7591
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 29 / Monday, February 13, 2006 / Notices
ATTACHMENT C.—CURRENT GRANTEES NOT RECEIVING WAIVERS AND ASSOCIATED GEOGRAPHIC AREAS—Continued
Unemployed
Poverty
Youth
PY 2006 Adult Funding Estimate: $198,849.
PY 2007 Adult Funding Estimate: $178,964.
No Youth Funding.
State: Michigan
Grantee: Southeastern Michigan Indians, Inc.
Macomb County .......................................................................................................................................
Oakland County .......................................................................................................................................
St. Clair County .......................................................................................................................................
PY 2006 Adult Funding Estimate: $98,517.
PY 2007 Adult Funding Estimate: $88,665.
No Youth Funding.
75
105
55
265
375
80
40
65
15
30
60
40
20
0
40
70
40
190
0
40
70
20
45
70
60
15
30
4
35
15
45
155
140
305
4
170
325
70
310
0
115
225
85
25
180
325
60
135
10
225
0
4
10
4
55
0
25
20
10
45
0
10
35
25
0
30
30
15
0
0
50
0
700
355
35
41
205
45
260
75
50
1,420
250
580
1,155
34
10
4
0
70
4
20
45
1
135
4
4
365
55
140
320
5
320
15
10
0
35
65
10
40
960
30
25
4
140
370
125
115
145
4
0
0
20
85
10
0
State: New Jersey
Grantee: Powhatan Renape Nation
Atlantic County .........................................................................................................................................
Bergen County .........................................................................................................................................
Burlington County ....................................................................................................................................
Camden County .......................................................................................................................................
Cape May County ....................................................................................................................................
Cumberland County .................................................................................................................................
Essex County ...........................................................................................................................................
Gloucester County ...................................................................................................................................
Hudson County ........................................................................................................................................
Hunterdon County ....................................................................................................................................
Mercer County .........................................................................................................................................
Middlesex County ....................................................................................................................................
Monmouth County ...................................................................................................................................
Morris County ..........................................................................................................................................
Ocean County ..........................................................................................................................................
Passaic County ........................................................................................................................................
Salem County ..........................................................................................................................................
Somerset County .....................................................................................................................................
Sussex County .........................................................................................................................................
Union County ...........................................................................................................................................
Warren County .........................................................................................................................................
PY 2006 Adult Funding Estimate: $281,343.
PY 2007 Adult Funding Estimate: $283,827.
No Youth Funding.
State: Oklahoma
Grantee: Wyandotte Nation
Kansas:
Cherokee County ..............................................................................................................................
Crawford County ...............................................................................................................................
Missouri:
Barry County .....................................................................................................................................
Barton County ...................................................................................................................................
Dade County .....................................................................................................................................
Jasper County ..................................................................................................................................
Lawrence County ..............................................................................................................................
McDonald County .............................................................................................................................
Newton County .................................................................................................................................
Native Hawaiian Imputation ......................................................................................................
PY 2006 Adult Funding Estimate: $106,174.
PY 2007 Adult Funding Estimate: $106,763.
No Youth Funding.
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with NOTICES
State: Wisconsin
Grantee: Oneida Tribe of Indians of Wisconsin, Inc.
Brown County ..........................................................................................................................................
Calumet County .......................................................................................................................................
Door County .............................................................................................................................................
Kewaunee County ...................................................................................................................................
Manitowoc County ...................................................................................................................................
Outagamie County ...................................................................................................................................
Sheboygan County ..................................................................................................................................
Winnebago County ..................................................................................................................................
VerDate Aug<31>2005
17:38 Feb 10, 2006
Jkt 208001
PO 00000
Frm 00089
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
E:\FR\FM\13FEN1.SGM
13FEN1
7592
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 29 / Monday, February 13, 2006 / Notices
ATTACHMENT C.—CURRENT GRANTEES NOT RECEIVING WAIVERS AND ASSOCIATED GEOGRAPHIC AREAS—Continued
Unemployed
PY
PY
PY
PY
2006
2007
2006
2007
Poverty
Youth
Adult Funding Estimate: $162,950.
Adult Funding Estimate: $162,950.
Youth Funding Estimate: $26,178.
Youth Funding Estimate: $18,325.
Total Current Grantees Not Receiving Waivers: 7.
[FR Doc. 06–1251 Filed 2–10–06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510–30–P
NATIONAL CREDIT UNION
ADMINISTRATION
Sunshine Act Meeting
10 a.m., Thursday,
February 16, 2006.
PLACE: Board Room, 7th Floor, Room
7047, 1775 Duke Street, Alexandria, VA
22314–3428.
STATUS: Open.
MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED:
1. Quarterly Insurance Fund Report.
2. Advance Notice of Proposed
Rulemaking and Request for Comment:
Part 715 of NUCA’s Rules and
Regulations, Supervisory Committee
Audits.
RECESS: 11:15 a.m.
TIME AND DATE: 11:30 a.m., Thursday,
February 16, 2006.
PLACE: Board Room, 7th Floor, Room
7047, 1775 Duke Street, Alexandria, VA
22314–3428.
STATUS: Closed.
MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED:
1. Administrative Action under
Section 206(h)(1)(A) of the Federal
Credit Union Act. Closed pursuant to
Exemptions (8), (9)(A)(ii), and (9)(B).
2. Request from a Corporate Federal
Credit Union to Amend its Existing
Waiver under Part 704 of NCUA’s Rules
and Regulations. Closed pursuant to
Exemption (8).
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Mary Rupp, Secretary of the Board,
Telephone: (703) 518–6304.
TIME AND DATE:
Mary Rupp,
Secretary of the Board.
[FR Doc. 06–1374 Filed 2–9–06; 3:45 pm]
BILLING CODE 7535–01–M
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with NOTICES
NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION
Comment Management; Notice of
Establishment
The Director of the National Science
Foundation has determined that the
establishment of the Proposal Review
VerDate Aug<31>2005
17:38 Feb 10, 2006
Jkt 208001
Panel for Industrial Innovation is
necessary and in the public interest in
connection with the performance of
duties imposed upon the National
Science Foundation (NSF), by 42 U.S.C.
1861 et seq. This determination follows
consultation with the Committee
Management Secretariat, General
Services Administration.
Name of Committee: Proposal Review
Panel for Industrial Innovation
(#28164).
Purpose: Advise the National Science
Foundation on the merit of proposals of
proposals requesting financial support
for research and research-related
activities under the purview of the
Office of Industrial Innovation.
Responsible NSF Official: Kesh
Narayanan, Office of Industrial
Innovation, National Science
Foundation, 4201 Wilson Boulevard,
Arlington, VA 22230. Telephone: 703/
292–8050.
Dated: February 8, 2006.
Susanne Bolton,
Committee Management Officer.
[FR Doc. 06–1301 Filed 2–10–06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7555–01–M
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
COMMISSION
Submission for OMB Review;
Comment Request
Upon written request, copies available
from: Securities and Exchange
Commission, Office of Filings and
Information Services, Washington, DC
20549.
Extension: Rule 18f–3; SEC File No. 270–385;
OMB Control No. 3235–0441.
Notice is hereby given that, pursuant
to the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995
(44 U.S.C. 3501–3520), the Securities
and Exchange Commission
(‘‘Commission’’) has submitted to the
Office of Management and Budget
requests for extension of the previously
approved collections of information
discussed below.
Section 18(f)(1) 1 of the Investment
Company Act of 1940 2 (the ‘‘Investment
1 15
2 15
PO 00000
U.S.C. 80a–18(f)(1).
U.S.C. 80a.
Frm 00090
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Company Act’’) prohibits registered
open-end management investment
companies (‘‘funds’’) from issuing any
senior security. Rule 18f–3 under the
Act 3 exempts from section 18(f)(1) a
fund that issues multiple classes of
shares representing interests in the same
portfolio of securities (a ‘‘multiple class
fund’’) if the fund satisfies the
conditions of the rule. In general, each
class must differ in its arrangement for
shareholder services or distribution or
both, and must pay the related expenses
of that different arrangement.
The rule includes one requirement for
the collection of information. A
multiple class fund must prepare, and
fund directors must approve, a written
plan setting forth the separate
arrangement and expense allocation of
each class, and any related conversion
features or exchange privileges (‘‘rule
18f–3 plan’’).4 Approval of the plan
must occur before the fund issues any
shares of multiple classes and whenever
the fund materially amends the plan. In
approving the plan, a majority of the
fund board, including a majority of the
fund’s independent directors, must
determine that the plan is in the best
interests of each class and the fund as
a whole.
The requirement that the fund prepare
and directors approve a written rule
18f–3 plan is intended to ensure that the
fund compiles information relevant to
the fairness of the separate arrangement
and expense allocation for each class,
and that directors review and approve
the information. Without a blueprint
that highlights material differences
among classes, directors might not
perceive potential conflicts of interests
when they determine whether the plan
is in the best interests of each class and
the fund. In addition, the plan may be
useful to Commission staff in reviewing
the fund’s compliance with the rule.
There are approximately 1,142
multiple class funds.5 Based on a review
of typical rule 18f–3 plans, the
Commission’s staff estimates that the
1,142 funds together make an average of
3 17
CFR 270.18f–3.
18f–3(d).
5 This estimate is based on data from Form N–
SAR, the semi-annual report that funds file with the
Commission.
4 Rule
E:\FR\FM\13FEN1.SGM
13FEN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 71, Number 29 (Monday, February 13, 2006)]
[Notices]
[Pages 7579-7592]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 06-1251]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
Employment and Training Administration
Indian and Native American Employment and Training Programs;
Solicitation for Grant Applications and Announcement of Competition
Waivers for Program Years 2006 and 2007
Announcement Type: New. Notice of Solicitation for Grant
Applications and Announcement of Competition Waivers.
Funding Opportunity Number: SGA/ DFA-PY-05-05.
Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance (CFDA) Number: 17.265
Key Dates: The closing date for receipt of applications under this
announcement is by 5 p.m. (Eastern Time), 30 days after the date of
publication in the Federal Register. Application and submission
information is explained in detail in Part IV of this Solicitation for
Grant Applications (SGA).
Summary: The U.S. Department of Labor (DOL), Employment and
Training Administration (ETA), announces the availability of
competitive grant funds to provide employment and training services to
Indians, Alaska Natives and Native Hawaiians under section 166 of the
Workforce Investment Act (WIA) for Program Years (PY) 2006, and 2007
(July 1, 2006 through June 30, 2008). Competition for section 166
grants is conducted every two years, except that the Secretary may
waive the requirement for such competition for current grantees that
have performed satisfactorily.
Through this Notice, the Department announces that the Secretary
has waived competition for this solicitation for grantees that have
performed satisfactorily under their current grant. (See Attachment A
for a list of grantees receiving waivers.) To apply for an award of
funds for PY 2006 and 2007 for their current service area, current
grantees receiving a waiver of competition only need to submit a cover
letter, signed by an authorized signatory, and a Standard Form (SF) 424
Application for Federal Assistance (Version 02), which will serve as
the grantee's ``Notice of Intent'' (NOI) to continue providing WIA
section 166 services. Submittals on https://www.grants.gov, with
authorized electronic signatures, will also be accepted in place of the
hard copy cover letter and SF 424.
The Secretary has also waived competition for this solicitation for
those grantees operating a WIA section 166 training and employment
program as part of a Pub. L. 102-477 Demonstration Project, which
allows federally-recognized tribes, or entities serving federally-
recognized tribes, to consolidate formula-funded employment, training,
and related dollars under a single service plan administered by the
Department of the Interior. (See Attachment B for a list of Pub. L.
102-477 grantees.) Grantees operating a WIA section 166 grant as part
of a Public Law 102-477 Demonstration Project will need to submit a
cover letter, signed by an authorized signatory, and a Standard Form
(SF) 424 Application for Federal Assistance (Version 02), which will
serve as the grantee's ``Notice of Intent'' (NOI) to continue providing
WIA section 166 services to the address provided in section IV (3) of
this notice. Submittals on https://www.grants.gov, with authorized
electronic signatures, will also be accepted in place of the hard copy
cover letter and SF 424.
Competition for funding under this solicitation is limited to the
geographic areas listed in Attachment C of this SGA. Any eligible
entity, including new applicants and current grant recipients serving
other geographic areas, may apply for funding to serve these areas.
Current grantees serving these geographic areas are subject to
competition and must submit a grant application as specified in Part IV
(2) in order to compete for their existing service area.
Important: Organizations seeking WIA section 166 funding for this
period must comply with the provisions of this SGA. Late applications
from current grantees or new applicants will not be considered for
those geographic service areas that are in competition (as listed in
Attachment C).
A list of current grantees and the geographic areas they serve can
be found at: https://www.doleta.gov/dinap/cfml/CensusData.cfm.
Addresses: Applications may be submitted electronically on https://
www.grants.gov or in hard-copy via mail or hand delivery. Mailed
applications must be sent to: U.S. Department of Labor, ETA, Room N-
4617, 200 Constitution Ave., NW., Washington,
[[Page 7580]]
DC 20210, Attention: James Stockton. Applicants are advised that mail
delivery in the Washington, DC area may be delayed due to mail
decontamination procedures. Hand delivered proposals will be received
at the above address. Applications submitted via facsimile (fax)
machine will not be accepted.
Supplementary Information: This solicitation consists of eight
parts and three attachments:
Part I provides the funding description and background
information.
Part II describes the size and nature of the anticipated
awards.
Part III describes eligible applicants and other grant
specifications.
Part IV provides information on the application and
submission process.
Part V describes the criteria against which applications
will be reviewed and evaluated, and explains the proposal review
process.
Part VI provides award administration information.
Part VII contains DOL agency contact information.
Part VIII lists additional resources of interest to
applicants.
Attachment A lists grantees receiving waivers. As
indicated, this list also includes grantees which will receive
conditional designation with conditions to be specified by the Grant
Officer and reflected in the grant award.
Attachment B lists Public Law 102-477 grantees receiving
waivers.
Attachment C lists grantees that did not receive a waiver
and areas/counties open for competition and associated funding amounts.
I. Funding Opportunity Description
Section 166 of the Workforce Investment Act (WIA) makes funds
available to Indian tribes, tribal organizations, Alaska Native
entities, Indian-controlled organizations serving Indians, and Native
Hawaiian organizations to support employment and training activities in
order to: (A) Develop more fully the academic, occupational, and
literacy skills of such individuals, (B) make such individuals more
competitive in the workforce, and (C) promote the economic and social
development of Indian, Alaska Native, and Native Hawaiian communities
in accordance with the goals and values of such communities.
Requirements for WIA section 166 programs are set forth in WIA section
166 (29 U.S.C. 2911) and its regulations, found at 20 CFR part 668,
published at 65 FR 49294, 49435 (Aug. 11, 2000).
1. Background on the Workforce Investment Act (WIA), Section 166 Grants
(Also Known as Indian and Native American Grants or INA Grants)
The U.S. Department of Labor, Employment & Training Administration
has awarded employment and training grants to Indian tribes, urban
Indian centers, and other non-profit organizations serving Indians,
Alaska Natives, and Native Hawaiians for over 30 years. These grants
have been authorized under various forms of legislation such as the Job
Training Partnership Act (JTPA) enacted in 1982, and its predecessor,
the Comprehensive Employment and Training Act (CETA) enacted in 1973.
While WIA maintains most of the core program values that existed in
previous laws, it also establishes key reforms that are applicable to
Native American programs.
One of the key reforms under WIA is the emphasis on the
coordination of federally-funded job training programs. The mechanism
used to coordinate these various job training programs is the One-Stop
delivery system. Under WIA, the Native American section 166 program is
a required partner in the One-Stop delivery system. As such, grantees
must execute a Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) with the local
workforce investment board that identifies the role of the INA grantee
in the One-Stop center. It is important that section 166 grantees
coordinate with their local One-Stop service provider(s).
Applicants to this SGA should also be aware of ETA's move towards
results-oriented employment and training programs. In order to better
measure performance, ETA has established common measures for all ETA
programs. Listed below are the adult performance outcomes that section
166 grants are measured by:
Entered Employment
Employment Retention
Earnings Increase
Applicants which receive supplemental youth funds will be measured by
the following criteria:
Placement in Employment or Education
Attainment of a Degree or Certificate
Literacy and Numeracy gains
Additional information on performance measures can be found in ETA's
Training and Employment Guidance Letter (TEGL) 28-04 (April 15, 2005),
which can be found at: https://wdr.doleta.gov/directives/attach/TEGL28-
04.pdf and at https://www.doleta.gov/performance/guidance/
Adminstrators_Mtg_QA_for_web_1-12-04.cfm#Common
2. Waivers
As indicated in the Summary above, the Secretary has the authority
to grant waivers from competition to grantees that have performed
satisfactorily under their current grant. Incumbent grantees that have
performed satisfactorily, both programmatically and administratively,
under the last two grant cycles will receive a waiver from competition
for the PY 2006-2007, designation period funded under this notice.
However, if DOL has found that the grantee serving a geographic
area demonstrated substantial and persistent failures of performance,
that geographic area was placed in competition, UNLESS the grantee is
serving a geographic area over which it has legal jurisdiction, as will
be discussed in greater detail in subsection (b) titled ``Conditional
Designation''.
(a) Criteria for Determining Substantial and Persistent Failures of
Performance
As a baseline criteria for determining substantial and persistent
failures of performance, the Department has applied: (1) Program
performance measures, (2) the responsibility review criteria at 20 CFR
667.170, and, (3) the factors related to ability to administer funds in
20 CFR 668.220 and 668.230. The seriousness of the factors supporting a
finding of denying a competition waiver is less than that required to
support a finding of non-responsibility.
(b) Conditional Designation
The determination regarding whether to deny a waiver required some
adjustment with respect to those grantees with substantial and
persistent failures of performance that are Federally recognized Indian
tribes or Alaska Native entities serving geographic areas over which
they have legal jurisdiction and a priority for designation under 20
CFR 668.210(a). In these situations, the Department determined that it
will provide a waiver and a conditional designation to such grantees.
This treatment is in recognition that the Section 166 regulations
provide a priority for designation for Federally recognized Indian
tribes and Alaska Native entities (or consortia that include such a
tribe or Alaska Native entity) regarding geographic areas and/or
populations over which they have legal jurisdiction,
The conditions on the designation will be specified by the Grant
Officer in the grant award. Conditional designation means that such
grantees will be required to follow specific instructions by the Grant
Officer in
[[Page 7581]]
regards to their substantial and persistent failures of performance.
The designation of the grantee is limited to the geographic area over
which it has legal jurisdiction as defined by 20 CFR 668.210(a). Those
geographic areas which the grantee serves but lacks legal jurisdiction
are subject to competition.
(c) Description of Attachments
Attachment A provides a list of current grantees receiving
competition waivers (including those tribes and Alaska Native entities
that will receive conditional designations). Attachment B is a list of
P.L. 102-477 grantees receiving waivers. Attachment C is a list of
current grantees not receiving waivers and associated geographic areas
open to competitive selection. If a grantee received only conditional
designation and waiver from competition, the grantee's legal
jurisdiction is not listed on Attachment C.
3. Procedures after Designation
Being designated as a section 166 service provider, either under a
waiver or through competition, will not automatically result in an
immediate award of grant funds. Entities that successfully complete the
designation process, including winning any competition(s) for service
area(s) that may occur as defined in this SGA, must prepare a two-year
Comprehensive Services Program (CSP) Plan that must be approved by DOL.
Instructions for preparation of the CSP Plan will be issued to all
designated service providers under separate guidance.
After a section 166 designee's CSP Plan is approved by DOL, a grant
agreement (``Notice of Obligation'' or NOO) must be executed in
accordance with 20 CFR 668.292. Each NOO will reflect the amount of
section 166 funds awarded as determined in accordance with 20 CFR
668.296 and 668.440.
II. Award Information
Type of assistance instrument: Funds will be awarded under this
solicitation through two-year grants. Exact award amounts will be
determined by DOL after designation of service areas and service
providers, and once funding appropriations for the grant periods have
been made by Congress. Waivers of competition have been made for the PY
06-07 grant cycle, as explained in Section I(2) of this SGA.
The section 166 program is a ``formula funded'' program that
receives an annual appropriation of not less than $55,000,000
authorized under Section 174(a) of WIA. For PY2004-2005, this amount
was distributed throughout the United States to 182 grantees. The
amounts awarded under the CSP (Adult) in PY 2005 ranged from $13,898 to
$6,011,664. The median grant award amount was $171,735. Adult award
amounts for all section 166 grantees can be found at: https://
www.doleta.gov/dinap/pdf/CSPholdHarmless.pdf.
Adult funding: The amount of funding a grantee will receive for
adult services is based on a formula specified at 20 CFR 668.296(b).
The CSP (Adult) Funding Formula is as follows:
(1) One-quarter of the funds will be allocated based on the
percentage of unemployed Native Americans living in the grantee's
designated INA service area (as defined below) compared to the total
number of unemployed Native Americans living in the United States.
(2) Three-quarters of the funds will be allocated based on the
percentage of Native Americans living in poverty in the grantee's
designated INA service area compared to the total number of Native
Americans living in poverty in the United States.
A grantee's designated INA service area is the area identified by
the DOL Grant Officer in the grant award in which the grant applicant
will operate an employment and training program (usually a county or
reservation area). Grant applicants must specify the geographic area(s)
they wish to serve in their grant application. The ETA uses counties
and tribal reservations, Alaska Native villages and Alaska Native
regional corporations to identify areas of service. The ETA used data
from the 2000 Census to determine the number of Native Americans in
poverty and unemployed for each service area. Attachment C identifies
the services areas in competition for PY 2006-2007, along with the
number of Native Americans in each geographic area who are unemployed,
in poverty, or in the youth age bracket and the estimated funding
associated with each service area.
Youth funding: Grant applicants serving reservation areas and
grantees serving any area in the State of Oklahoma also receive
Supplemental Youth Services (SYS) program funds. Youth funds are
appropriated annually as stated in WIA at section 127(b)(1)(C)(i).
Annual appropriations for the SYS program have been approximately
$15,000,000, which has been awarded to approximately 136 Native
American grantees. The amounts awarded under the SYS program in 2005
ranged from $1,315 to $2,706,072. The median grant award amount was
$40,241. Youth award amounts for all section 166 grantees can be found
at: https://www.doleta.gov/dinap/pdf/SYSPholdHarmless.pdf.
The amount of youth funding a grantee will receive is based on a
formula specified at 20 CFR 668.440. The SYS Funding Formula is as
follows: SYS funding will be allocated to grantees serving reservations
(or areas in the State of Oklahoma) based on the percentage of Native
American Youth between the ages of 14 and 21 living in poverty in the
grantee's designated INA service area compared to the number of Native
American youth between the ages of 14 and 21 living in poverty on all
reservation areas and the State of Oklahoma.
Award amounts available for areas in competition: Estimated funds
to be awarded for those areas in competition are included in Attachment
C.
III. Eligibility Information
1. Eligible Applicants
To be eligible for an award of funds under WIA section 166 and this
solicitation, an entity must meet all eligibility requirements of WIA
section 166 and 20 CFR 668.200, as well as the application and
designation requirements found at 20 CFR part 668, subpart B. The
Federal regulations can be downloaded from the Internet at: https://
www.doleta.gov/dinap/pdf/wiafinalregsall.pdf. Potential applicants are
expected to thoroughly review and comply with the statute and
regulations.
Organizations that are potentially eligible to apply for WIA
section 166 funds under this solicitation are:
Federally recognized Indian Tribes
Tribal organizations as defined in 25 U.S.C. 450b
Alaskan Native-controlled organizations representing regional
or village areas, as defined in the Alaska Native Claims Settlement Act
Native Hawaiian-controlled entities
Native American-controlled organizations serving Indians,
including community and faith-based organizations (see definition of
Native American-controlled organizations described below)
State-recognized tribal organizations serving individuals who
were eligible to participate under JTPA section 401, as of August 6,
1998
Consortia of eligible entities which individually meet the
legal requirements for a consortium (see definition of a consortium
described below). Additionally, to be eligible, entities must have a
legal status as a government, an agency of a government, a private non-
profit corporation (e.g., incorporated under IRS section 501(c)(3), or
a consortium as defined below. Applicants seeking to provide services
in a geographic
[[Page 7582]]
service area for the first time must satisfy the funding threshold
identified below.
Definition of Native American-Controlled Organization: A Native
American-controlled organization is defined as any organization for
which more than 50 percent of the governing board members are Indians
or Native Americans. Such an organization can be a tribal government,
Native Alaska or Native Hawaiian entity, consortium, or public or
private non-profit agency. For the purpose of this award application,
the governing board must have decision-making authority for the WIA
section 166 program.
Eligible consortium: Each member of a consortium must individually
meet the requirement of an eligible applicant, as defined in 20 CFR
668.200 (c), (that is, be a federally recognized tribe, or tribal
organization, or Alaska Native-controlled organization, etc.) and at
least one of the consortia members must have a legal status as a
government, an agency of a government or a private non-profit
corporation. Additionally, the consortium must meet the following
conditions: (1) Have members in close proximity to one another but not
necessarily in the same State; (2) have an administrative unit legally
authorized to run the program and to commit the other members to
contracts, grants, and other legally binding agreements; and (3) be
jointly and individually responsible for the actions and obligations of
the consortium, including debts.
Funding Thresholds: To be eligible for funding, a new (non-
incumbent) entity must request one or more geographic service areas in
competition that contain an eligible population of sufficient size to
result in a funding level of at least $100,000 under the combined adult
and youth funding formulas. See Sec. 668.200(a)(3). Current section
166 grantees that do not meet the $100,000 threshold are exempt from
this requirement. Federally-recognized tribes currently receiving, or
applying for WIA section 166 funds under Public Law 102-477 only need
to meet a $20,000 threshold, as long as the combined funding under
Public Law 102-477 is at least $100,000. Attachment C provides funding
estimates for the geographic areas in competition.
2. Cost Sharing or Matching
The section 166 program does not require grantees to share costs or
provide matching funds.
3. Other Eligibility Criteria
In accordance with 29 CFR part 98, entities that are debarred or
suspended shall be excluded from Federal financial assistance and are
ineligible to receive a section 166 grant.
Additionally the applicant must have the ability to administer
section 166 funds. The ability to administer section 166 funds is
determined in accordance with 20 CFR 668.220 and 668.230.
Limitations on those served under a WIA section 166 grant are
identified in Part IV (5) of this SGA, ``Funding Restrictions.''
Applicants should be aware that there are specific program
regulations and OMB circulars that grantees must adhere to upon
receiving a section 166 grant. See Part IV (2) of this SGA below.
IV. Application and Submission Information
1. Address to Request Application Package
This SGA contains all of the information needed to apply for grant
funding.
2. Content and Form of Application Submission
Information that must be submitted under this SGA will depend on
the applicant's status with DOL/ETA. For the purposes of this SGA,
grant applicants are divided into four categories, each of which is
addressed separately below: (a) Current grantees receiving a waiver
from competition for their service area, including those with
conditional designation (see listing in Attachment A); (b) current
grantees operating a WIA section 166 grant under Public Law 102-477
(see listing of 102-477 grantees in Attachment B); (c) current grantees
not receiving waivers from competition (see listing in Attachment C);
and (d) new applicants (non-incumbent) for areas in competition.
a. Current grantees receiving a waiver from competition. Current
grantees receiving a waiver of competition, as listed in Attachment A
of this SGA, only need to submit the following documents:
A brief cover letter informing ETA of the organization's
interest in applying for WIA section 166 funds, signed by an authorized
signatory official.
A Standard Form (SF) 424 (Version 02). (See information
regarding the completion of the SF-424 below.)
If a current grantee with a competition waiver for an existing
service area wishes to apply for additional geographic service areas,
the additional service area(s) must be stated in item 14 of
the SF-424 and the procedures in Section V of this SGA must be followed
to apply for grant funding for the additional area(s). A current
grantee that has received a waiver from competition does not jeopardize
its existing service area by applying for additional service areas nor
does it receive any preference for the additional area.
b. Federally recognized tribes applying for section 166 funds under
Public Law 102-477. Public Law 102-477 authorizes WIA section 166 funds
to be awarded to federally recognized tribes under a ``consolidation''
plan administered through the U.S. Department of Interior. Public Law
102-477 allows federally-recognized tribes to consolidate formula-
funded employment and training related funds under a single,
consolidated plan. Grantees operating a WIA section 166 grant under
Public Law 102-477, as listed in Attachment B of this SGA, only need to
submit the following documents:
A brief cover letter informing ETA of the organization's
interest in applying for WIA section 166 funds, signed by an authorized
signatory official.
A Standard Form (SF) 424 (Version 02). (See information
regarding the completion of the SF-424 below.)
These documents indicate their intent to continue receiving section
166 funds. Tribes wishing to apply for WIA section 166 funds under
Public Law 102-477 should not apply under this solicitation. Instead,
tribes must submit a 477 plan to the U.S. Department of Interior.
New tribal applicants should be aware that in order for ETA to
timely obligate FY 2007, funds under Public Law 102-477, a tribe's 477
plan must be received by the Department of Interior no later than April
1, 2006, and approved no later than June 30, 2006. For further
information on applying for WIA section 166 funds under Public Law 102-
477, please contact Athena R. Brown, Chief, DINAP, at (202) 693-3737
(this is not a toll-free number).
c. Current grantees not receiving a waiver from competition.
Current grantees not receiving a waiver from competition, as listed in
Attachment C of this SGA, only need to submit the following documents
to initially express interest in continuing to serve the geographic
service area placed in competition:
A brief cover letter informing the ETA of the
organization's interest in applying for WIA section 166 funds, signed
by an authorized signatory official.
A Standard Form (SF) 4249 (Version 02). (See information
regarding the completion of the SF 424 below.)
While these are the only documents initially required, grantees not
receiving
[[Page 7583]]
a waiver should be aware that other entities may apply for their
geographic service area(s). In cases where a new applicant (or
applicants) applies for a current grantee's service area (see
Attachment C), the Grant Officer will notify the applicant that there
is competition for that service area no later than 15 days after the
SGA deadline date. Upon such notification, the applicant will be given
30 days from the date of the notification to submit a competitive grant
proposal that responds to the evaluation criteria described in Part
V(1) and that complies with requirements for new applicants under Part
IV(2)(c) below (except that current grantees need not provide
identification or proof of legal status, unless it has changed since
the entity's current grant award). Current grantees not receiving a
waiver may want to prepare a competitive grant proposal in advance of
the notice of competition as some portions (such as letters of support)
may take longer than the 15 days to prepare.
If there is no competition for a service area currently served by a
grantee that did not receive a waiver, the Grant Officer, in
consultation with DINAP and consistent with 20 CFR 668.210, 668.250,
and 668.280, will make a decision to continue funding to the current
grantee, or to designate the service area to another WIA section 166
grantee that is willing to serve the area, or to transfer funding into
the formula to be distributed among all WIA section 166 grantees.
d. New applicants for areas in competition. New applicants must
submit a complete grant proposal that addresses each of the evaluation
criteria indicated in Part V(1) of this SGA. The proposal may not
exceed twenty (20) double-spaced, single-sided, 8.5 inch x 11 inch
pages with 12 point text font and one inch margins. In addition, in
attachments which may not exceed 10 pages, the applicant may provide
resumes, a list of staff positions to be funded by the grant, letters
of support, statistical information, and other related material.
The proposal must include within the 20-page limit:
A brief cover letter informing the ETA of the
organization's interest in applying for WIA section 166 funds, signed
by an authorized signatory official.
A Standard Form (SF) 424 (Version 02) (see information
regarding the completion of the SF-424 below).
Identification of the applicant's legal status, including
articles of incorporation for non-profit organizations or consortium
agreement (if applicable).
A specific description of the geographic area (i.e.,
county or reservation) being applied for. Only areas placed in
competition and identified in Attachment C of this SGA can be applied
for. New applicants should identify the area(s) they wish to serve in
item 14 of the SF-424. Applicants may include service areas in
an attachment to the SF-424 if additional space is needed.
Completing the Standard Form (SF) 424 (Version 02)
The SF-424 is available for downloading at https://www.grants.gov.
The SF-424 must clearly identify the applicant and be signed by an
individual with authority to enter into a grant agreement. Upon
confirmation of an award, the individual signing the SF-424 on behalf
of the applicant shall be considered the representative of the
applicant.
While the SF-424 requires general information about an applicant,
applicants may not be familiar with some required items, or the
information may not be readily available. Explanations of these items
are provided below:
Item #8(c)--Organization DUNS: All applicants for Federal
funds are required to have a Dun and Bradstreet (DUNS) number. The DUNS
number is a nine-digit identification number that uniquely identifies
business entities. Obtaining a DUNS number is easy and there is no
charge. To obtain a DUNS number access this website: https://
www.dunandbradstreet.com or call 1-866-705-5711. Many organizations
already have a DUNS number. Applicants should verify that their
organization does not already have a DUNS number before obtaining a new
number.
Item #11--Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Number
(CFDA): The CFDA number for the WIA section 166 program is 17.265. This
number must be provided in item 11.
Item #14--Areas Affected by Project: Applicants must
include the specific geographic areas they wish to serve (i.e.,
counties, reservations, etc.). Current grantees that wish to serve
their existing service area and are not applying for additional service
areas only need to indicate ``Existing Service Area'' in this section.
Current grantees and new applicants requesting service areas that are
open to competition as indicated in Attachment C of this SGA must
include the State, County, and Reservation service area in line item
14. Applicants may include service areas in an attachment to the SF-424
if additional space is needed.
Item #17--Proposed Project Start Date and Ending Date: The
WIA section 166 program is funded for a two-year period and is based on
a program year period of July 1 through June 30. The proposed start
date under this solicitation is July 1, 2006, and the proposed end date
is June 30, 2008.
Item #18--Estimated Funding: The WIA section 166 program
is a formula funded program based on population characteristics of
geographic service areas assigned to grantees and such variables as the
annual congressional appropriations. Since WIA section 166 funding
awards are calculated by the DOL/ETA, it is not necessary for
applicants to complete Item 18. However, current grantees can
view their estimated funding which has been calculated by the DOL/ETA
through 2010, at this website: https://www.doleta.gov/dinap/cfml/
CensusData.cfm. Please note that the funding amounts located at the Web
sites above are estimates based on the Fiscal Year 2004, congressional
appropriation. Funding estimates for those areas in competition are
included in Attachment C.
Item #19--Is application Subject to Review by State Under
Executive Order 12372 process? The WIA section 166 program is not
subject to Executive Order 12372.
All applicants (except for current Pub. L. 102-477 grantees) may
submit their applications on https://www.grants.gov with authorized
electronic signatures. This will be accepted in place of the hard copy
cover letter and SF-424. New applicants must submit hard copies of
other required documents.
3. Submission Date, Times, and Addresses
All applications may be submitted electronically on https://
www.grants.gov or in hard-copy via mail or hand delivery. Applicants
submitting proposals in hard-copy must submit an original signed
application, SF-424 (all new applicants must also submit a SF-424A,
Budget Form) and one (1) ``copy-ready'' version. Do not bind, staple,
or insert protruding tabs.
The closing date for receipt of applications under this
announcement is by 5 p.m. (eastern time), 30 days after the date of
publication. Applications must be received at the address below no
later than 5 p.m. (eastern time). Applications sent by e-mail,
telegram, or facsimile (fax) will not be accepted. Applications that do
not meet the conditions set forth in this notice will not be
considered. No exceptions to the
[[Page 7584]]
mailing and delivery requirements set forth in this notice will be
granted.
Mailed applications must be addressed to the U.S. Department of
Labor, Employment and Training Administration, Division of Federal
Assistance, Attention: James Stockton, Grant Officer, Reference SGA/
DFA-PY-05-05, 200 Constitution Avenue, NW., Room N-4716, Washington, DC
20210. Applicants are advised that mail delivery in the Washington area
may be delayed due to mail decontamination procedures. Hand delivered
proposals will be received at the above address. All overnight mail
will be considered to be hand-delivered and must be received at the
designated place by the specified closing date and time. Proposals
submitted on diskette or CD are not encouraged as decontamination
procedures may cause damage.
For those applying online through https://www.grants.gov, it is
strongly recommended that applicants immediately initiate and complete
the ``Get Started'' registration steps at https://www.grants.gov/
GetStarted. These steps may take multiple days to complete, and this
time should be factored into plans for electronic application
submission in order to avoid facing unexpected delays that could result
in the rejection of an application. If submitting electronically
through https://www.grants.gov, it would be appreciated if the
application submitted is saved as .doc, .pdf, or .txt files.
Applications submitted online, with authorized electronic signatures,
are acceptable, in lieu of the brief cover letter with signature.
Late Applications: Any application received after the exact date
and time specified for receipt at the office designated in this notice
will not be considered, unless it is received before awards are made
and it (a) was sent by U.S. Postal Service registered or certified mail
not later than the fifth calendar day before the date specified for
receipt of applications (e.g., an application received after the
deadline, but having a U.S. postmark showing an early submittal will
not be considered late if received before awards are made), or (b) was
sent by U.S. Postal Service Express Mail or https://www.grants.gov to
the addressee not later than 5 p.m. at the place of mailing or
electronic submission one working day prior to the date specified for
receipt of applications. It is highly recommended that online
submissions be completed one working day prior to the date specified
for receipt of applications to ensure that the applicant still has the
option to submit by U.S. Postal Service Express Mail in the event of
any electronic submission problems. ``Post marked'' means a printed,
stamped, or otherwise placed impression (exclusive of a postage meter
machine impression) that is readily identifiable, without further
action, as having been supplied or affixed on the date of mailing by an
employee of the U.S. Postal Service. Therefore, applicants should
request the postal clerk to place a legible hand cancellation ``bull's
eye'' postmark on both the receipt and the package. Failure to adhere
to the above instructions will be a basis for a determination of non-
responsiveness.
Note: Except as specifically provided in this Notice, DOL/ETA's
acceptance of a proposal and an award of Federal funds to sponsor
any program(s) does not provide a waiver of any grant requirements
and/or procedures. For example, OMB Circulars require that an
entity's procurement procedures must ensure that all procurement
transactions are conducted, as much as practical, to provide open
and free competition. If a proposal identifies a specific entity to
provide services, the DOL/ETA's award does not provide the
justification or basis to sole source the procurement, i.e., avoid
competition, unless the activity is regarded as the primary work of
an official partner to the application.
Important: Organizations seeking WIA section 166 funding for this
period must comply with the provisions of this SGA. Late applications
from current grantees or new applicants will not be considered for
those geographic service areas that are in competition (as listed in
Attachment C).
4. Intergovernmental Review
This funding opportunity is not subject to Executive Order (EO)
12372 ``Intergovernmental Review of Federal Programs.''
5. Funding Restrictions
Allowable costs. Determinations of allowable costs will be made in
accordance with the applicable Federal cost principles, e.g., for
tribes, OMB Circular A-87, for non-profit organizations, OMB Circular
A-122. See 20 CFR 668.810 and 668.840 (incorporating WIA cost rules at
20 CFR 667.200 to 667.220). Disallowed costs are those charges to a
grant that the grantor agency or its representative determines not to
be allowable in accordance with the applicable Federal Cost Principles
or other conditions contained in the grant. The WIA section 166 program
limits administrative costs to 15% but may be negotiated up to 20% upon
approval from the grantor agency. There are no specific limits on
indirect costs; however, since most indirect costs are considered
administrative costs, the amount of indirect cost collected, regardless
of the approved rate, may be limited by the overall administrative cost
limit. WIA funds must not be spent on construction or purchase of
facilities or buildings except in specific circumstances specified at
section 667.260.
Limitation on the type of individuals served: The regulations at 20
CFR 668.300(a) limit eligibility for WIA section 166 program services
to Native Americans as determined by a policy of the Native American
grantee, Alaska Natives, and Native Hawaiians. Those receiving services
must also, under Sec. 668.300(b), be either low income, unemployed,
underemployed as defined in 20 CFR 668.150, a recipient of a bona fide
layoff notice which has taken effect in the last six months or will
take effect in the following six month period, or employed persons in
need of employment and training services to achieve self-sufficiency.
Grantees must ensure that all eligible population members have
equitable access to employment and training services. See 20 CFR
668.650(a). Priority of services must be given to veterans and spouses
of certain veterans in accordance with the provisions of the ``Jobs for
Veterans Act,'' Public Law 107-288. Since all individuals served by the
section 166 program must be Native American, Alaska Native, or Native
Hawaiian, so must the veterans receiving priority under the ``Jobs for
Veterans Act'' be Native American, Alaska Native, or Native Hawaiian.
V. Application Review Information
1. Evaluation Criteria
The factors listed below will be considered in evaluating the
applicants' approach to providing services and their ability to produce
the best outcomes for covered individuals residing in the service area.
2. Review and Selection Process
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Evaluation criteria Points
------------------------------------------------------------------------
A.i. Previous experience or demonstrated capabilities in 20
successfully operating an employment and training program
established for and serving Indians and Native Americans....
[[Page 7585]]
ii. Previous experience in operating or coordinating with 10
other human resources development programs serving Indians
and Native Americans. Applicant should describe other
successful Federal, State, or private foundation grants that
the applicant has operated in the last two years............
iii. Demonstration of coordination and linkages with Indian 10
and non-Indian employment and training resources within the
community...................................................
B.i. Description of the entity's planning process and 20
demonstration of involvement with the INA community.........
ii. Approach to providing services, including identification 10
of the training and employment problems and needs in the
requested area, and approach to addressing such needs.......
C.i. Demonstration of involvement with local employers and 10
efforts that have been made to link unemployed Native
Americans with employers. Applicant should also describe
involvement with local Workforce Investment Boards, or if
applicable, youth programs, and/or councils.................
ii. Applicants should describe efforts that have been made to 10
coordinate their human resource services described under
Criteria A(ii) with State Operated One-Step delivery systems
D. Demonstration of support and recognition by the Native 10
American Community and service population, including local
tribes and adjacent Indian organizations and the client
populations to be served....................................
----------
Maximum Available Points................................. 100
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Overall Review Process. Where two or more entities apply for the
same service area that has been placed in competition, DOL's Division
of Indian and Native American Programs (DINAP), with the concurrence of
the Grant Officer, will conduct an initial review of the applications
for compliance with the statute, regulations, and this SGA. The initial
review will consider, among other things, timeliness and completeness
of submission, applicant eligibility, eligibility of the requested
service area, population size, and funding thresholds as described in
Part III (1) of this SGA. Applications that do not satisfy these
conditions will not be considered.
The review will also consider any designation priority, as
described in the next paragraph, and compliance with financial
responsibility criteria, in accordance with 20 CFR 668.220 and 668.230,
to ensure that applicants are capable of properly handling and
accounting for Federal funds. Organizations with no prior grant history
with the Department, or about whom there are financial or grant
management concerns, may be conditionally designated pending an on-site
review and/or a six-month assessment of program progress.
The Grant Officer is not required to adhere to the geographical
service area requested by an applicant. The Grant Officer may make a
designation of all the area requested, or, if acceptable to the
applicant, a portion of the area requested or more than the area
requested.
Designation Priority. In non-reservation areas placed in
competition, consistent with 20 CFR 668.210(c), priority for
designation will be given to entities with a Native American-controlled
governing body and which are representative of the Native American
community or communities that they are applying to serve.
Competitive Selection Procedures. If two or more applicants satisfy
the initial review described above, for a geographic area identified in
Attachment C that is open to competition under this SGA, then a
competitive selection will be made following the procedures in this
section and applying the designation priority noted above. When
competitive selection is necessary, DINAP will notify each applicant of
the competing Notices of Intent no later than 15 days after the
application deadline date. Upon notification of competition, current
grantees will be given 30 days from the date of notification to submit
a complete proposal, as specified in Part IV (2)(c).
Where a competitive evaluation is required, the Grant Officer will
use a formal panel review process to score proposals and any supporting
attachments against the evaluation criteria listed in Part V (1). The
review panel will include individuals with knowledge of or expertise in
programs dealing with Indians and Native Americans. The purpose of the
panel is to review and evaluate an organization's potential, based on
its application, to provide services to a specific Native American
community, and submit recommendations to the Grant Officer.
It is DOL's policy that no information affecting the panel review
process will be solicited or accepted after the deadlines for receipt
of applications set forth in this SGA. All submitted information must
be in writing. This policy does not preclude the Grant Officer from
requesting, or considering, additional information independent of the
panel review process. During the review, the panel will not give weight
to undocumented assertions. Any information must be supported by
adequate and verifiable documentation, e.g., supporting references must
contain the name of the contact person, an address, and telephone
number. Panel ratings and recommendations are advisory to the Grant
Officer.
Determination of Designation-Scoring. The Grant Officer will make
the final determination of section 166 designees and of the geographic
service area for which each designation is made. The Grant Officer will
select the entity that demonstrates the ability to produce the best
outcomes for its customers, based on all available evidence and in
consideration of any designation priorities as described in above. In
addition to considering the review panel's rating in those instances in
which a panel is convened, the Grant Officer may consider any other
available information regarding the applicants' financial and
administrative capability, operational capability, and responsibility
in order to make funding determinations that are advantageous to the
government.
The Grant Officer need not designate an entity for every geographic
area. See 20 CFR 668.294. If there are service areas in competition for
which no entity submitted a complete application or for which no entity
achieved a score of at least 70, the Grant Officer may either designate
no service provider or may designate an entity based on demonstrated
capability to provide the best services to the client population. DOL
reserves the rights to select applicants with scores lower than 70 or
lower than competing applications if such selection would, in DOL's
judgment, result in the most effective and appropriate combination of
services to the client population, funding, and costs.
An applicant that does not receive WIA 166 funding, in whole or in
part, as a result of this process, will be afforded the opportunity to
appeal the Grant Officer's decision as provided at 20 CFR 668.270.
[[Page 7586]]
3. Anticipated Announcement and Award Dates
If possible, designation decisions will be made by March 1, 2006.
VI. Award Administration Information
1. Award Notices
The Grant Officer, Mr. James Stockton, will notify applicants of
the results of their application as follows:
Designation Award Letter. The designation award letter signed by
the Grant Officer will serve as official notice that the applicant has
been awarded WIA section 166 funding. The designation award letter will
include the geographic service area for which the designation is made.
Conditional Designation Award Letter. Conditional award
designations will include identification of the geographic service
area, the nature of the conditions, and the actions required for the
applicant to be removed from conditional award status and the time
frame in which such actions must be accomplished.
Non-Designation Award Letter. Any organization not receiving a
designated award, in whole or in part, for a requested geographic
service area that is in competition (as identified in Attachment C)
will be notified formally of the non-award designation.
Notification by a person or entity, other than the Grant Officer
that an applicant has been awarded WIA section 166 funds is not valid.
2. Administrative and National Policy Requirements
Applicants that are awarded WIA section 166 funds and become a
Grantee of the ETA must comply with the provisions of WIA and its
regulations. Particular attention should be given to part 668 of Title
20 of the Code of Federal Regulations (published in the Federal
Register August 11, 2000), which focuses specifically on programs for
Indians and Native Americans under WIA. In addition, all grants will be
subject to the following administrative standards and provisions, as
applicable to the particular grantee:
20 CFR part 667--Administrative provisions under Title I of
WIA
29 CFR part 2, subpart D--Equal Treatment in Department of
Labor Programs for Religious Organizations; Protection of Religious
Liberty of Department of Labor Social Service Providers and
Beneficiaries
29 CFR parts 30, 31, 32, 33, 35 and 36--Equal Employment
Opportunity in Apprenticeship and Training; Nondiscrimination in
Federally Assisted Programs of the Department of Labor--Effectuation of
Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964; Nondiscrimination on the
Basis of Handicap in Programs or Activities Conducted by the Department
of Labor; Nondiscrimination on the Basis of Age in Programs or
Activities Receiving Federal Financial Assistance from the Department
of Labor; and Nondiscrimination on the Basis of Sex in Education
Programs Receiving or Benefiting from Federal Financial Assistance
29 CFR part 37--Implementation of the Nondiscrimination and
Equal Opportunity Provisions of the Workforce Investment Act of 1998
(WIA)
29 CFR part 93--Lobbying
29 CFR part 95--Uniform Administrative Requirements for Grants
and Agreements with Institutions of Higher Education, Hospitals, and
Other Non-Profit Organizations, and with Commercial Organizations
29 CFR part 96--Federal Standards for Audit of Federally
Funded Grants, Contracts, and Agreements
29 CFR part 97 Uniform Administrative Requirements for Grants
and Cooperative Agreements to State and Local Governments
29 CFR part 98--Government-wide Debarment and Suspension (Non-
Procurement) and Government-wide Requirements for Drug-Free Workplace
(Grants)
29 CFR part 99--Audit of States, Local Governments, and Non-
Profit Organizations
In accordance with WIA Section 195(6) and 20 CFR 668.630(f),
programs funded under this SGA may not involve political activities.
Additionally, in accordance with Section 18 of the Lobbying Disclosure
Act of 1995, Public Law 104-65 (2 U.S.C. 1611), non-profit entities
incorporated under 501(c)(4) that engage in lobbying activities are not
eligible to receive Federal funds and grants. Further, this program is
subject to the provisions of the ``Jobs for Veterans Act,'' Public Law
107-288, which provides priority of service to veterans and spouses of
certain veterans for the receipt of employment, training, and placement
services in any job training program directly funded, in whole or in
part, by the Department of Labor. Please note that, to obtain priority
of service, a veteran must meet the program's eligibility requirements.
ETA Training and Employment Guidance Letter (TEGL) No. 5-03 (September
16, 2003) provides guidance on the scope of the veterans priority
statute and its effect on current employment training programs.
3. Reporting
Applicants that are awarded WIA section 166 funds and become a
grantee of the ETA will be required to submit reports on financial
expenditures, program participation, and participant outcomes on no
more than a quarterly basis and in accordance with ETA-specified
formats, deadlines, and other requirements. The ETA will be modifying
program reports for the WIA section 166 program to reflect OMB Common
Measures which will take effect beginning July 1, 2006. Grantee
performance will be evaluated against the Common Measures on an annual
basis.
VII. Agency Contacts
Questions regarding this SGA can be directed to: Serena Boyd,
Grants Management Specialist, e-mail: boyd.serena@dol.gov; (202) 693-
3338; FAX: (202) 693-2879 (this is not a toll-free number).
VIII. Other Information
Potential applicants may obtain further information on the WIA
section 166 program for employment and training of Native Americans
through the website for DOL's Division of Indian and Native American
Programs: https://www.doleta.gov/dinap/. Any information submitted in
response to this SGA will be subject to the provisions of the Privacy
Act and the Freedom of Information Act, as appropriate. The Department
of Labor is not obligated to make any awards as a result of this SGA,
and only the Grant Officer can bind the Department to the provision of
funds under WIA section 166. Unless specifically provided in the grant
agreement, DOL's acceptance of a proposal and/or award of Federal funds
does not waive any grant requirements and/or procedures.
Signed at Washington, DC, this 6th day of February 2006.
Emily Stover DeRocco,
Assistant Secretary, Employment and Training Administration.
Attachment A--Current Grantees Receiving Waivers
Attachment B--Public Law 102-477 Grantees Receiving Waivers
Attachment C--Current Grantees Not Receiving Waivers and Associated
Geographic Areas
[[Page 7587]]
Attachment A.--Current Grantees Receiving Waivers
------------------------------------------------------------------------
State Grantee name
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Alabama.................................... Inter-Tribal Council of
Alabama
Alabama.................................... Poarch Band of Creek
Indians
Alaska..................................... Ilisagvik College
Alaska..................................... Kenaitze Indian Tribe
Alaska..................................... Maniilaq Association
Alaska..................................... Tanana Chiefs Conference
Arizona.................................... Affiliation of Arizona
Indian Centers, Inc.
Arizona.................................... American Indian Association
of Tucson
Arizona.................................... Colorado River Indian
Tribes
Arizona.................................... Gila River Indian Community
Arizona.................................... Hopi Tribal Council
Arizona.................................... Hualapai Tribe
Arizona.................................... Inter-Tribal Council of
Arizona, Incorporated
Arizona.................................... Native Americans for
Community Action, Inc.
Arizona.................................... Navajo Nation
Arizona.................................... Pascua Yaqui Tribe
Arizona.................................... Phoenix Indian Center, Inc.
Arizona.................................... Quechan Indian Tribe
Arizona.................................... Salt River Pima-Maricopa
Indian Community
Arizona.................................... San Carlos Apache Tribe
Arizona.................................... Tohono O odham Nation
Arizona*................................... White Mountain Apache Tribe
Arkansas................................... American Indian Center of
Arkansas, Inc.
California................................. California Indian Manpower
Consortium
California................................. Candelaria American Indian
Council
California................................. Indian Human Resources
Center
California................................. Northern California Indian
Development Council, Inc.
California................................. Southern California Indian
Center, Inc.
California................................. Tule River Tribal Council
California................................. United Indian Nations, Inc.
California................................. Ya-Ka-Ama Indian Education
and Development, Inc.
Colorado................................... Southern Ute Indian Tribe
Colorado................................... Ute Mountain Ute Tribe
Delaware................................... Nanticoke Indian
Association, Inc.
Florida.................................... Florida Governors Council
on Indian Affairs, Inc.
Florida.................................... Miccosukee Tribe of Indians
of Florida
Hawaii..................................... Alu Like, Inc.
Indiana.................................... American Indian Center of
Indiana, Inc.
Kansas..................................... United Tribes of Kansas and
Southeast Nebraska, Inc.
Louisiana.................................. Inter-Tribal Council of
Louisiana, Inc.
Maine...................................... Penobscot Nation
Massachusetts.............................. Mashpee-Wampanoag Indian
Tribal Council, Inc.
Massachusetts.............................. North American Indian
Center of Boston, Inc.
Michigan................................... Grand Traverse Band of
Ottawa and Chippewa
Indians
Michigan................................... Inter-Tribal Council of
Michigan, Inc.
Michigan................................... Michigan Indian Employment
and Training Services,
Inc.
Michigan................................... Pokagon Band of Potawatomi
Indians
Michigan................................... Sault Ste. Marie Tribe of
Chippewa Indians
Minnesota.................................. American Indian
Opportunities, Inc.
Minnesota*................................. Bois Forte Reservation
Tribal Council
Minnesota.................................. Fond Du Lac Reservation
Minnesota.................................. Leech Lake Band of Ojibwe
Minnesota.................................. Minneapolis American Indian
Center
Mississippi................................ Mississippi Band of Choctaw
Indians
Missouri................................... American Indian Council
Montana.................................... Assiniboine and Sioux
Tribes
Montana.................................... B.C. of The Chippewa Cree
Tribe
Montana.................................... Blackfeet Tribal Business
Council
Montana.................................... Crow Tribe of Indians
Montana.................................... Montana United Indian
Association
Montana.................................... Northern Cheyenne Tribe
Nebraska................................... Indian Center, Inc.
Nebraska*.................................. Omaha Tribe of Nebraska
Nevada..................................... Inter-Tribal Council of
Nevada, Inc.
Nevada..................................... Las Vegas Indian Center,
Inc.
New Mexico................................. Alamo Navajo School Board
New Mexico................................. Eight Northern Indian
Pueblo Council
New Mexico................................. Five Sandoval Indian
Pueblos, Inc.
New Mexico................................. Jicarilla Apache Tribe
New Mexico................................. Mescalero Apache Tribe
New Mexico................................. National Indian Youth
Council
New Mexico................................. Pueblo of Acoma
[[Page 7588]]
New Mexico................................. Pueblo of Isleta
New Mexico................................. Pueblo of Taos
New Mexico................................. Ramah Navajo School Board,
Inc.
New Mexico................................. Santa Clara Indian Pueblo
Tribal Government
New Mexico................................. Santo Domingo Tribe
New York................................... American Indian Community
House, Inc.
New York................................... Native American Community
Services of Erie and
Niagara
New York................................... Native American Cultural
Center, Inc.
New York................................... St. Regis Mohawk Tribe
North Carolina............................. Cumberland County
Association for Indian
People, Inc.
North Carolina............................. Eastern Band of Cherokee
Indians
North Carolina............................. Guilford Native American