Rawlings Sporting Goods Company; A Subsidiary of K2 Inc., Licking, Missouri; Notice of Affirmative Determination Regarding Application for Reconsideration, 7076 [E6-1915]
Download as PDF
<![CDATA[
7076
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 28 / Friday, February 10, 2006 / Notices
DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
Employment and Training
Administration
[TA–W–58,095]
Premier Quilting Corporation, Oxford,
NC; Dismissal of Application for
Reconsideration
Pursuant to 29 CFR 90.18(C) an
application for administrative
reconsideration was filed with the
Director of the Division of Trade
Adjustment Assistance for workers at
Premier Quilting Corporation, Oxford,
North Carolina. The application did not
contain new information supporting a
conclusion that the determination was
erroneous, and also did not provide a
justification for reconsideration of the
determination that was based on either
mistaken facts or a misinterpretation of
facts or of the law. Therefore, dismissal
of the application was issued.
TA–W–58,095; Premier Quilting
Corporation, Oxford, North
Carolina, (February 2, 2006).
Signed at Washington, DC this 3rd day of
February 2006.
Linda G. Poole,
Certifying Officer, Division of Trade
Adjustment Assistance.
[FR Doc. E6–1913 Filed 2–9–06; 8:45 am]
certified for Trade Adjustment
Assistance (TAA) under TA–W–50,065
(issued December 16, 2002). The
petitioners also allege that those
circumstances which supported the
previous certification still exist and
infer that they should be used to
support certification in the immediate
petition.
The Department carefully reviewed
the petitioner’s request for
reconsideration and has determined that
the Department will conduct further
investigation based on new information
provided by the petitioner and the
company official.
Conclusion
After careful review of the
application, I conclude that the claim is
of sufficient weight to justify
reconsideration of the Department of
Labor’s prior decision. The application
is, therefore, granted.
Signed at Washington, DC, this 2nd day of
February 2006.
Elliott S. Kushner,
Certifying Officer, Division of Trade
Adjustment Assistance.
[FR Doc. E6–1915 Filed 2–9–06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510–30–P
DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
BILLING CODE 4510–30–P
Employment and Training
Administration
DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
Notice of Determinations Regarding
Eligibility To Apply for Worker
Adjustment Assistance
Employment and Training
Administration
[TA–W–58,485]
rmajette on PROD1PC67 with NOTICES1
Rawlings Sporting Goods Company; A
Subsidiary of K2 Inc., Licking,
Missouri; Notice of Affirmative
Determination Regarding Application
for Reconsideration
By application of January 10, 2006, a
petitioner requested administrative
reconsideration of the Department of
Labor’s Notice of Negative
Determination Regarding Eligibility to
Apply for Worker Adjustment
Assistance, applicable to workers of the
subject firm. The Department’s negative
determination was issued on December
27, 2005. The Notice of determination
published in the Federal Register on
January 17, 2006 (71 FR 2568).
The request for reconsideration
alleged that the subject worker group
supports production at an affiliated
facility and that production is shifting
from that facility to a foreign facility.
Rawlings Sporting Goods Co., Inc.,
Licking, Missouri was previously
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:10 Feb 09, 2006
Jkt 208001
In accordance with section 223 of the
Trade Act of 1974, as amended, (19
U.S.C. 2273), the Department of Labor
herein presents summaries of
determinations regarding eligibility to
apply for trade adjustment assistance for
workers (TA–W) number and alternative
trade adjustment assistance (ATAA) by
(TA–W) number issued during the
periods of January 2006.
In order for an affirmative
determination to be made and a
certification of eligibility to apply for
directly-impacted (primary) worker
adjustment assistance to be issued, each
of the group eligibility requirements of
section 222(a) of the Act must be met.
I. Section (a)(2)(A) all of the following
must be satisfied:
A. A significant number or proportion
of the workers in such workers’ firm, or
an appropriate subdivision of the firm,
have become totally or partially
separated, or are threatened to become
totally or partially separated;
PO 00000
Frm 00075
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
B. The sales or production, or both, of
such firm or subdivision have decreased
absolutely; and
C. Increased imports of articles like or
directly competitive with articles
produced by such firm or subdivision
have contributed importantly to such
workers’ separation or threat of
separation and to the decline in sales or
production of such firm or subdivision;
or
II. Section (a)(2)(B) both of the
following must be satisfied:
A. A significant number or proportion
of the workers in such workers’ firm, or
an appropriate subdivision of the firm,
have become totally or partially
separated, or are threatened to become
totally or partially separated;
B. There has been a shift in
production by such workers’ firm or
subdivision to a foreign county of
articles like or directly competitive with
articles which are produced by such
firm or subdivision; and
C. One of the following must be
satisfied:
1. The country to which the workers’
firm has shifted production of the
articles is a party to a free trade
agreement with the United States;
2. The country to which the workers’
firm has shifted production of the
articles to a beneficiary country under
the Andean Trade Preference Act,
African Growth and Opportunity Act, or
the Caribbean Basin Economic Recovery
Act; or
3. There has been or is likely to be an
increase in imports of articles that are
like or directly competitive with articles
which are or were produced by such
firm or subdivision.
Also, in order for an affirmative
determination to be made and a
certification of eligibility to apply for
worker adjustment assistance as an
adversely affected secondary group to be
issued, each of the group eligibility
requirements of section 222(b) of the
Act must be met.
(1) Significant number or proportion
of the workers in the workers’ firm or
an appropriate subdivision of the firm
have become totally or partially
separated, or are threatened to become
totally or partially separated;
(2) The workers’ firm (or subdivision)
is a supplier or downstream producer to
a firm (or subdivision) that employed a
group of workers who received a
certification of eligibility to apply for
trade adjustment assistance benefits and
such supply or production is related to
the article that was the basis for such
certification; and
(3) Either—
(A) The workers’ firm is a supplier
and the component parts it supplied for
E:\FR\FM\10FEN1.SGM
10FEN1
]]>Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 71, Number 28 (Friday, February 10, 2006)]
[Notices]
[Page 7076]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E6-1915]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
Employment and Training Administration
[TA-W-58,485]
Rawlings Sporting Goods Company; A Subsidiary of K2 Inc.,
Licking, Missouri; Notice of Affirmative Determination Regarding
Application for Reconsideration
By application of January 10, 2006, a petitioner requested
administrative reconsideration of the Department of Labor's Notice of
Negative Determination Regarding Eligibility to Apply for Worker
Adjustment Assistance, applicable to workers of the subject firm. The
Department's negative determination was issued on December 27, 2005.
The Notice of determination published in the Federal Register on
January 17, 2006 (71 FR 2568).
The request for reconsideration alleged that the subject worker
group supports production at an affiliated facility and that production
is shifting from that facility to a foreign facility. Rawlings Sporting
Goods Co., Inc., Licking, Missouri was previously certified for Trade
Adjustment Assistance (TAA) under TA-W-50,065 (issued December 16,
2002). The petitioners also allege that those circumstances which
supported the previous certification still exist and infer that they
should be used to support certification in the immediate petition.
The Department carefully reviewed the petitioner's request for
reconsideration and has determined that the Department will conduct
further investigation based on new information provided by the
petitioner and the company official.
Conclusion
After careful review of the application, I conclude that the claim
is of sufficient weight to justify reconsideration of the Department of
Labor's prior decision. The application is, therefore, granted.
Signed at Washington, DC, this 2nd day of February 2006.
Elliott S. Kushner,
Certifying Officer, Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance.
[FR Doc. E6-1915 Filed 2-9-06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510-30-P
