Proposed Collection; Comment Request, 7080-7081 [E6-1834]
Download as PDF
7080
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 28 / Friday, February 10, 2006 / Notices
rmajette on PROD1PC67 with NOTICES1
Rule 15g–6, SEC File No. 270–349, OMB
Control No. 3235–0395
Notice is hereby given that pursuant
to the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995
(44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.), the Securities
and Exchange Commission
(‘‘Commission’’) is soliciting comments
on the collection of information
summarized below. The Commission
plans to submit this existing collection
of information to the Office of
Management and Budget for extension
and approval.
• (Rule 15g–6—Account statements
for penny stock customers.
Rule 15g–6 under the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 requires brokers
and dealers that sell penny stocks to
their customers to provide monthly
account statements containing
information with regard to the penny
stocks held in customer accounts. The
information is required to be provided
to customers of broker-dealers that effect
penny stock transactions in order to
provide those customers with
information that is not now publicly
available. Without this information,
investors would be less able to protect
themselves from fraud and to make
informed investment decisions.
The staff estimates that there are
approximately 240 broker-dealers that
are subject to the rule. The staff
estimates that the firms affected by the
rule will, at any one time, have
approximately 150 new customers with
whom they have effected transactions in
penny stocks, each of whom would
receive a maximum of 12 account
statements per year, for a total of 1,800
account statements annually for each
firm (150 customers × 12 account
statements/customer). The staff
estimates that a broker-dealer would
expend approximately three minutes in
processing the information required for
each account statement. Accordingly,
the estimated average annual burden
would equal 90 hours (1,800 account
statements × 3 minutes/account
statement ÷ 1 hour/60 minutes), and the
estimated average total burden would
equal 21,600 hours (90 hours × 240).
Written comments are invited on: (a)
Whether the proposed collection of
information is necessary for the proper
performance of the functions of the
agency, including whether the
information shall have practical utility;
(b) the accuracy of the agency’s
estimates of the burden of the proposed
collection of information; (c) ways to
enhance the quality, utility, and clarity
of the information to be collected; and
(d) ways to minimize the burden of the
collection of information on
respondents, including through the use
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:10 Feb 09, 2006
Jkt 208001
of automated collection techniques or
other forms of information technology.
Consideration will be given to
comments and suggestions submitted in
writing within 60 days of this
publication.
Please direct your written comments
to R. Corey Booth, Director/Chief
Information Officer, Office of
Information Technology, Securities and
Exchange Commission, 100 F Street,
NE., Washington, DC 20549.
Dated: February 1, 2006.
Jill M. Peterson,
Assistant Secretary.
[FR Doc. E6–1831 Filed 2–9–06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8010–01–P
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
COMMISSION
Proposed Collection; Comment
Request
Upon Written Request, Copies Available
From: Securities and Exchange
Commission, Office of Filings and
Information Services, Washington, DC
20549.
Extension:
Form N–SAR; SEC File No. 270–292; OMB
Control No. 3235–0330.
Notice is hereby given that pursuant
to the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995
(44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.) (‘‘PRA’’), the
Securities and Exchange Commission
(the ‘‘Commission’’) is soliciting
comments on the collections of
information summarized below. The
Commission plans to submit these
existing collections of information to the
Office of Management and Budget
(‘‘OMB’’) for extension and approval.
• Form N–SAR—Semi-Annual Report
for Registered Investment Companies
Form N–SAR is the form used by all
registered investment companies with
the exception of face amount certificate
companies, to comply with the periodic
filing and disclosure requirements
imposed by Section 30 of the
Investment Company Act of 1940 [15
U.S.C. 80a–1 et seq.], and of rules 30a1–
1 and 30b1–1 under the Act. The
information required to be filed with the
Commission assures the public
availability of the information and
permits verification of compliance with
Investment Company Act requirements.
Registered unit investment trusts are
required to provide this information on
an annual report filed with the
Commission on Form N–SAR (OMB
Control No. 3235–0330) pursuant to rule
30a1–1 under the Investment Company
Act [17 CFR 30a1–1], and registered
management investment companies
PO 00000
Frm 00079
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
must submit the required information
on a semi-annual report on Form N–
SAR pursuant to rule 30b1–1 under the
Act [17 CFR 270.30b1–1].1
The Commission estimates that the
total number of respondents is 4,130
and the total annual number of
responses is 7,430 ((3,300 respondents X
2 responses per year) + (830
respondents X 1 response per year)).
The Commission estimates that each
registrant filing a report on Form N-SAR
would spend, on average, 14.43 hours in
preparing and filing the Form and that
the total hour burden for all Form NSAR filings would be 107,203 hours.
Estimates of the burden hours are made
solely for the purposes of the PRA, and
are not derived from a comprehensive or
even a representative survey or study of
the costs of Commission rules and
forms.
Written comments are invited on: (a)
Whether the proposed collection of
information is necessary for the proper
performance of the functions of the
agency, including whether the
information will have practical utility;
(b) the accuracy of the agency’s estimate
of the burden of the collection of
information; (c) ways to enhance the
quality, utility, and clarity of the
information collected; and (d) ways to
minimize the burden of the collection of
information on respondents, including
through the use of automated collection
techniques or other forms of information
technology. Consideration will be given
to comments and suggestions submitted
in writing within 60 days of this
publication.
Please direct your written comments
to R. Corey Booth, Director/Chief
Information Officer, Office of
Information Technology, Securities and
Exchange Commission, 100 F Street,
NE., Washington, DC 20549.
February 2, 2006.
Nancy M. Morris,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. E6–1833 Filed 2–9–06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8010–01–P
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
COMMISSION
Proposed Collection; Comment
Request
Upon written request, copies available
from: Securities and Exchange
Commission, Office of Filings and
Information Services, Washington, DC
20549.
1 Face amount certificate companies are required
to file periodic reports pursuant to Section 13 or
15(d) of the Exchange Act [15 U.S.C. 78m, 78o(d)].
E:\FR\FM\10FEN1.SGM
10FEN1
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 28 / Friday, February 10, 2006 / Notices
Extension:
Rule 9b–1; SEC File No. 270–429; OMB
Control No. 3235–0480.
rmajette on PROD1PC67 with NOTICES1
Notice is hereby given that pursuant
to the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995
(44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.) the Securities
and Exchange Commission
(‘‘Commission’’) is soliciting comments
on the collection of information
summarized below. The Commission
plans to submit this existing collection
of information to the Office of
Management and Budget for extension
and approval.
Options Disclosure Document
Rule 9b–1 under the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 (17 CFR 240.9b–
1) sets forth the categories of
information required to be disclosed in
an options disclosure document
(‘‘ODD’’) and requires the options
markets to file an ODD with the
Commission 60 days prior to the date it
is distributed to investors. In addition,
Rule 9b–1 provides that the ODD must
be amended if the information in the
document becomes materially
inaccurate or incomplete and that
amendments must be filed with the
Commission 30 days prior to the
distribution to customers. Finally, Rule
9b–1 requires a broker-dealer to furnish
to each customer an ODD and any
amendments, prior to accepting an order
to purchase or sell an option on behalf
of that customer.
There are 6 options markets that must
comply with Rule 9b–1. These 6
respondents work together to prepare a
single ODD covering options traded on
each market, as well as amendments to
the ODD. These respondents file no
more than one amendment per year,
which requires approximately 8 hours
per year for each respondent. Thus, the
total compliance burden for options
markets per year is 48 hours. The
approximate cost per hour is $100,
resulting in a total cost of compliance
for these respondents of $4,800 per year
(48 hours @ $100).
In addition, approximately 2,000
broker-dealers must comply with Rule
9b–1. Each of these respondents will
process an average of three new
customers for options each week and,
therefore, will have to furnish
approximately 156 ODDs per year. The
postal mailing or electronic delivery of
the ODD takes respondents no more
than 30 seconds to complete for an
annual compliance burden for each of
these respondents of 78 minutes, or 1.3
hours. Thus, the total compliance
burden per year is 2,600 hours (2,000
broker-dealers × 1.3 hours). The
approximate cost per hour to these
respondents is $10 per hour, resulting in
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:10 Feb 09, 2006
Jkt 208001
a total cost of compliance for these
respondents of $26,000 per year (2,600
hours @ $10).
The total compliance burden for all
respondents under this rule (both
options markets and broker-dealers) is
2648 hours per year (48 + 2,600), and
total compliance costs of $30,800
($4,800 + $26,000).
Written comments are invited on: (a)
Whether the proposed collection of
information is necessary for the proper
performance of the functions of the
agency, including whether the
information will have practical utility;
(b) the accuracy of the agency’s estimate
of the burden of the collection of
information; (c) ways to enhance the
quality, utility, and clarity of the
information collected; and (d) ways to
minimize the burden of the collection of
information on respondents, including
through the use of automated collection
techniques or other forms of information
technology. Consideration will be given
to comments and suggestions submitted
in writing within 60 days of this
publication.
Please direct your written comments
to R. Corey Booth, Director/Chief
Information Officer, Office of
Information Technology, Securities and
Exchange Commission, 100 F Street,
NE., Washington, DC 20549.
February 1, 2006.
Nancy M. Morris,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. E6–1834 Filed 2–9–06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8010–01–P
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
COMMISSION
[File No. 1–18460]
Issuer Delisting; Notice of Application
of Community Capital Corporation To
Withdraw Its Common Stock, $1.00 Par
Value, From Listing and Registration
on the American Stock Exchange LLC
February 2, 2006.
On January 19, 2006, Community
Capital Corporation, a South Carolina
corporation (‘‘Issuer’’), filed an
application with the Securities and
Exchange Commission (‘‘Commission’’),
pursuant to section 12(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(‘‘Act’’) 1 and Rule 12d2–2(d)
thereunder,2 to withdraw its common
stock, $1.00 par value (‘‘Security’’), from
listing and registration on the American
Stock Exchange LLC (‘‘Amex’’).
On January 18, 2006, the Board of
Directors (‘‘Board’’) of the Issuer
1 15
2 17
PO 00000
Frm 00080
Fmt 4703
unanimously approved resolutions to
withdraw the Security from listing and
registration on Amex and to list the
Security on the Nasdaq National Market
(‘‘Nasdaq’’). The Issuer stated that the
following reasons factored into the
Board’s decision: (i) The Board believes
that listing the Security on Nasdaq will
provide visibility for the Security,
improve liquidity in the Security, and
provide better execution quality for
investors; and (ii) the Board believes
that more of the Issuer’s peer financial
institutions are listed on Nasdaq than
listed on Amex.
The Issuer stated in its application
that it has met the requirements of
Amex Rule 18 by complying with all
applicable laws in effect in the State of
South Carolina, in which it is
incorporated, and provided written
notice of withdrawal to Amex.
The Issuer’s application relates solely
to withdrawal of the Security from
listing on Amex and from registration
under section 12(b) of the Act,3 and
shall not affect its obligation to be
registered under section 12(g) of the
Act.4
Any interested person may, on or
before February 28, 2006, comment on
the facts bearing upon whether the
application has been made in
accordance with the rules of Amex, and
what terms, if any, should be imposed
by the Commission for the protection of
investors. All comment letters may be
submitted by either of the following
methods:
Electronic Comments
• Use the Commission’s Internet
comment form (https://www.sec.gov/
rules/delist.shtml); or
• Send an e-mail to rulecomments@sec.gov. Please include the
File Number 1–18460 or;
Paper Comments
• Send paper comments in triplicate
to Nancy M. Morris, Secretary,
Securities and Exchange Commission,
100 F Street, NE., Washington, DC
20549–1090.
All submissions should refer to File
Number 1–18460. This file number
should be included on the subject line
if e-mail is used. To help us process and
review your comments more efficiently,
please use only one method. The
Commission will post all comments on
the Commission’s Internet Web site
(https://www.sec.gov/rules/delist.shtml).
Comments are also available for public
inspection and copying in the
Commission’s Public Reference Room.
3 15
U.S.C. 78l(d).
CFR 240.12d2–2(d).
4 15
Sfmt 4703
7081
E:\FR\FM\10FEN1.SGM
U.S.C. 78l(b).
U.S.C. 78l(g).
10FEN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 71, Number 28 (Friday, February 10, 2006)]
[Notices]
[Pages 7080-7081]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E6-1834]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Proposed Collection; Comment Request
Upon written request, copies available from: Securities and Exchange
Commission, Office of Filings and Information Services, Washington, DC
20549.
[[Page 7081]]
Extension:
Rule 9b-1; SEC File No. 270-429; OMB Control No. 3235-0480.
Notice is hereby given that pursuant to the Paperwork Reduction Act
of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.) the Securities and Exchange Commission
(``Commission'') is soliciting comments on the collection of
information summarized below. The Commission plans to submit this
existing collection of information to the Office of Management and
Budget for extension and approval.
Options Disclosure Document
Rule 9b-1 under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (17 CFR 240.9b-
1) sets forth the categories of information required to be disclosed in
an options disclosure document (``ODD'') and requires the options
markets to file an ODD with the Commission 60 days prior to the date it
is distributed to investors. In addition, Rule 9b-1 provides that the
ODD must be amended if the information in the document becomes
materially inaccurate or incomplete and that amendments must be filed
with the Commission 30 days prior to the distribution to customers.
Finally, Rule 9b-1 requires a broker-dealer to furnish to each customer
an ODD and any amendments, prior to accepting an order to purchase or
sell an option on behalf of that customer.
There are 6 options markets that must comply with Rule 9b-1. These
6 respondents work together to prepare a single ODD covering options
traded on each market, as well as amendments to the ODD. These
respondents file no more than one amendment per year, which requires
approximately 8 hours per year for each respondent. Thus, the total
compliance burden for options markets per year is 48 hours. The
approximate cost per hour is $100, resulting in a total cost of
compliance for these respondents of $4,800 per year (48 hours @ $100).
In addition, approximately 2,000 broker-dealers must comply with
Rule 9b-1. Each of these respondents will process an average of three
new customers for options each week and, therefore, will have to
furnish approximately 156 ODDs per year. The postal mailing or
electronic delivery of the ODD takes respondents no more than 30
seconds to complete for an annual compliance burden for each of these
respondents of 78 minutes, or 1.3 hours. Thus, the total compliance
burden per year is 2,600 hours (2,000 broker-dealers x 1.3 hours). The
approximate cost per hour to these respondents is $10 per hour,
resulting in a total cost of compliance for these respondents of
$26,000 per year (2,600 hours @ $10).
The total compliance burden for all respondents under this rule
(both options markets and broker-dealers) is 2648 hours per year (48 +
2,600), and total compliance costs of $30,800 ($4,800 + $26,000).
Written comments are invited on: (a) Whether the proposed
collection of information is necessary for the proper performance of
the functions of the agency, including whether the information will
have practical utility; (b) the accuracy of the agency's estimate of
the burden of the collection of information; (c) ways to enhance the
quality, utility, and clarity of the information collected; and (d)
ways to minimize the burden of the collection of information on
respondents, including through the use of automated collection
techniques or other forms of information technology. Consideration will
be given to comments and suggestions submitted in writing within 60
days of this publication.
Please direct your written comments to R. Corey Booth, Director/
Chief Information Officer, Office of Information Technology, Securities
and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street, NE., Washington, DC 20549.
February 1, 2006.
Nancy M. Morris,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. E6-1834 Filed 2-9-06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8010-01-P