Maintenance and Repair Reimbursement Pilot Program, 6438-6441 [E6-1691]
Download as PDF
rmajette on PROD1PC67 with PROPOSALS1
6438
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 26 / Wednesday, February 8, 2006 / Proposed Rules
Instructions: Direct your comments to
Docket ID No. EPA–R09–OAR–2005–
AZ–0006. EPA’s policy is that all
comments received will be included in
the public docket without change and
may be made available online at: https://
www.regulations.gov, including any
personal information provided, unless
the comment includes information
claimed to be Confidential Business
Information (CBI) or other information
whose disclosure is restricted by statute.
Do not submit information that you
consider to be CBI or otherwise
protected through https://
www.regulations.gov or e-mail. The
https://www.regulations.gov Web site is
an ‘‘anonymous access’’ system, which
means EPA will not know your identity
or contact information unless you
provide it in the body of your comment.
If you send an e-mail comment directly
to EPA, without going through https://
www.regulations.gov, your e-mail
address will be automatically captured
and included as part of the comment
that is placed in the public docket and
made available on the Internet. If you
submit an electronic comment, EPA
recommends that you include your
name and other contact information in
the body of your comment and with any
disk or CD–ROM you submit. If EPA
cannot read your comment due to
technical difficulties and cannot contact
you for clarification, EPA may not be
able to consider your comment.
Electronic files should avoid the use of
special characters, any form of
encryption, and be free of any defects or
viruses. For additional information
about EPA’s public docket visit the EPA
Docket Center homepage at https://
www.epa.gov/epahome/dockets.htm.
For additional instructions on
submitting comments, go to Section I.
General Information of the
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section of
this document.
Docket: All documents in the docket
are listed in the https://
www.regulations.gov index. Although
listed in the index, some information is
not publicly available, e.g., CBI or other
information whose disclosure is
restricted by statute. Certain other
material, such as copyrighted material,
will be publicly available only in hard
copy form. Publicly available docket
materials are available either
electronically in https://
www.regulations.gov or in hard copy at
the Office of Air Planning,
Environmental Protection Agency
(EPA), Region 9, Mailcode AIR–2, 75
Hawthorne Street, San Francisco,
California 94105–3901. EPA requests
that if at all possible, you contact the
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:24 Feb 07, 2006
Jkt 208001
individual listed in the FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT section to view
the hard copy of the docket. You may
view the hard copy of the docket
Monday through Friday, 8 a.m. to 4
p.m., excluding Federal holidays.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Wienke Tax, Office of Air Planning, U.S.
Environmental Protection Agency,
Region 9, (520) 622–1622, e-mail:
tax.wienke@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This
proposal addresses the determination
that the Ajo moderate PM10
nonattainment area in Arizona has
attained the National Ambient Air
Quality Standards (NAAQS) for
particulate matter with an aerodynamic
diameter less than or equal to a nominal
10 micrometers (PM10). This
determination is based upon monitored
air quality data for the PM10 NAAQS
during the years 2002–2004. This
proposal also addresses the
determination that, because the Ajo area
continues to attain the PM10 NAAQS,
certain attainment demonstration
requirements, along with other related
requirements of the CAA, are not
applicable to the Ajo area. In the Rules
and Regulations section of this Federal
Register, we are taking direct final
action to make these determinations
because we believe this action is not
controversial. If we receive adverse
comments, however, we will publish a
timely withdrawal of the direct final
rule and address the comments in
subsequent action based on this
proposed rule. We do not plan to open
a second comment period, so anyone
interested in commenting should do so
at this time. If we do not receive
comments, no further activity is
planned.
For all the reasons explained in the
parallel direct final notice, we propose
to determine that the Ajo moderate PM10
nonattainment area in Arizona has
attained the National Ambient Air
Quality Standards (NAAQS) for
particulate matter with an aerodynamic
diameter less than or equal to a nominal
10 micrometers (PM10). A determination
of attainment is not a redesignation to
attainment under CAA section 107(d)(3)
because we have not yet approved a
maintenance plan as required under
section 175(A) of the CAA or
determined that the area has met the
other CAA requirements for
redesignation.1
1 On December 20, 2005, EPA proposed revisions
to the NAAQS for particulate matter. See 71 FR
2620, January 17, 2006. The proposed revisions
address two categories of particulate matter: Fine
particles which are particles 2.5 micrometers in
diameter and smaller; and ‘‘inhalable coarse’’
PO 00000
Frm 00040
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
We further propose to determine that,
because the Ajo area has continued to
attain the PM10 NAAQS, certain
attainment demonstration requirements,
along with other related requirements of
the CAA, are not applicable to the Ajo
area. For further information on this
proposal and the rationale underlying
our proposed action, please see the
direct final action.
Dated: January 24, 2006.
Wayne Nastri,
Regional Administrator, Region 9.
[FR Doc. 06–1173 Filed 2–7–06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Maritime Administration
46 CFR Part 296
[Docket No. MARAD–2006–23804]
RIN 2133–AB68
Maintenance and Repair
Reimbursement Pilot Program
Maritime Administration,
Department of Transportation.
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: This proposed rule will
amend the Maritime Administration’s
(MARAD’s) regulations governing its
pilot program for the reimbursement of
costs of qualified maintenance and
repair (M&R) of Maritime Security
Program (MSP) vessels performed in
United States shipyards. Under Public
Law 109–163, the Secretary of
Transportation, acting through the
Maritime Administrator, is directed to
implement regulations that, among
other things, replace MARAD’s
voluntary M&R reimbursement program
with a mandatory system.
DATES: Comments are due by April 10,
2006.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments
[identified by DOT DMS Docket Number
MARAD–2006–23804] by any of the
following methods:
• Web Site: https://dms.dot.gov.
Follow the instructions for submitting
particles, which are particles between 2.5 and 10
micrometers (PM10–2.5). Upon finalization of a
primary 24-hour standard for PM10–2.5, EPA
proposes to revoke the current 24-hour PM10
standard in all areas of the country except in areas
where there is at least one monitor located in an
urbanized area (as defined by the U.S. Bureau of the
Census) with a minimum population of 100,000
that violates the current 24-hour PM10 standard
based on the most recent three years of data. In
addition, EPA proposes to revoke the current
annual PM10 standard upon finalization of a
primary 24-hour standard for PM10–2.5.
E:\FR\FM\08FEP1.SGM
08FEP1
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 26 / Wednesday, February 8, 2006 / Proposed Rules
rmajette on PROD1PC67 with PROPOSALS1
comments on the DOT electronic docket
site.
• Fax: 1–202–493–2251.
• Mail: Docket Management Facility;
U.S. Department of Transportation, 400
Seventh Street, SW., Nassif Building,
Room PL–401, Washington, DC 20590–
001.
• Hand Delivery: Room PL–401 on
the plaza level of the Nassif Building,
400 Seventh Street, SW., Washington,
DC, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday
through Friday, except Federal
Holidays.
• Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to
https://www.regulations.gov. Follow the
online instructions for submitting
comments.
Instructions: All submissions must
include the agency name and docket
number or Regulatory Identification
Number (RIN) for this rulemaking. Note
that all comments received will be
posted without change to https://
dms.dot.gov including any personal
information provided. Please see the
Privacy Act heading under Rulemaking
Notices.
Docket: For access to the docket to
read background documents or
comments received, go to https://
dms.dot.gov at any time or to Room PL–
401 on the plaza level of the Nassif
Building, 400 Seventh Street, SW.,
Washington, DC, between 9 a.m. and 5
p.m. (EST or EDT), Monday through
Friday, except Federal Holidays.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jean
E. McKeever, Associate Administrator
for Marine Asset Development,
Maritime Administration, 400 Seventh
Street, SW., Washington, DC 20590;
phone: (202) 366–5737; fax: (202) 366–
3511; or e-mail Jean.McKeever@dot.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
The Maritime Security Program (MSP)
was established to maintain a modern
U.S.-flag fleet of commercially viable,
militarily useful, privately-owned
vessels for national defense needs and
to maintain a strong U.S. presence in
international maritime trade. Under the
MSP, the U.S. Government contracts
with certain operators of U.S.-flag
commercial vessels to be on call for
service when needed in times of
national emergency or war.
The original MSP was established by
the Maritime Security Act of 1996 (Pub.
L. 104–239, Oct. 8, 1996) for fiscal years
1996 through 2005. On November 24,
2003, President Bush signed the
Maritime Security Act of 2003 (MSA
2003) (part of the National Defense
Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2004)
which reauthorized the MSP for fiscal
years 2006 through 2015.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:24 Feb 07, 2006
Jkt 208001
In addition to reauthorizing the MSP,
section 3517 of the MSA 2003
established a voluntary pilot program
under which the Secretary of
Transportation could enter into
agreement(s) to reimburse MSP vessel
operators for the costs of qualified
maintenance and repairs performed in
U.S. shipyards instead of foreign
shipyards. Reimbursement levels under
the voluntary program were established
at 80% of the difference between the fair
and reasonable cost of obtaining
qualified M&R work in U.S. shipyards
and the cost of qualified M&R work in
foreign shipyards. MARAD promulgated
implementing regulations for this
program at 46 CFR section 296.60 (70
FR 55581, Sept. 22, 2005).
Under Public Law 109–163, enacted
on January 6, 2006, the Secretary of
Transportation is directed to implement
regulations to replace the voluntary
M&R reimbursement program with a
mandatory program. Under the
mandatory program, MARAD must enter
into an agreement with one or more
MSP Contractors, subject to
appropriations, for the M&R of one or
more vessels that are subject to a MSP
operating agreement. Under Public Law
109–163, reimbursement levels are
established at 100% of the difference
between the fair and reasonable cost of
obtaining qualified M&R work in U.S.
shipyards and the cost of qualified M&R
work in foreign shipyards.
Public Comment
MARAD welcomes public comments
regarding the M&R pilot program and, in
particular, suggestions regarding what
documentation Contractors could
provide to assist MARAD in
determining the fair and reasonable cost
of obtaining qualified M&R work in U.S.
shipyards as well as in the foreign
shipyards where Contractors would
otherwise undertake such work.
Rulemaking Analyses and Notices
Executive Order 12866 (Regulatory
Planning and Review), and Department
of Transportation (DOT) Regulatory
Policies; Pub. L. 104–121
This proposed rule is not considered
a significant regulatory action under
section 3(f) of Executive Order 12866
and, therefore, was not reviewed by the
Office of Management and Budget. This
proposed rule is not likely to result in
an annual effect on the economy of $100
million or more. This proposed rule is
also not significant under the Regulatory
Policies and Procedures of the
Department of Transportation (44 FR
11034, February 26, 1979). The costs
and economic impact associated with
PO 00000
Frm 00041
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
6439
this rulemaking are considered to be so
minimal that no further analysis is
necessary.
Executive Order 13132
We have analyzed this rulemaking in
accordance with the principles and
criteria contained in Executive Order
13132 (‘‘Federalism’’) and have
determined that it does not have
sufficient Federalism implications to
warrant the preparation of a Federalism
summary impact statement. The
regulations have no substantial effects
on the States, the current Federal-State
relationship, or on the current
distribution of power and
responsibilities among local officials.
Therefore, consultation with State and
local officials was not necessary.
Executive Order 13175
MARAD does not believe that this
proposed rule will significantly or
uniquely affect the communities of
Indian tribal governments when
analyzed under the principles and
criteria contained in Executive Order
13175 (Consultation and Coordination
with Indian Tribal Governments).
Therefore, the funding and consultation
requirements of this Executive Order do
not apply.
Regulatory Flexibility
The Maritime Administrator certifies
that this proposed rule will not have a
significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities. We
anticipate that no small entities will
participate in this program.
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995
This proposed rule will not impose an
unfunded mandate under the Unfunded
Mandates Reform Act of 1995. It will
not result in costs of $100 million or
more, in the aggregate, to any of the
following: State, local, or Native
American tribal governments, or the
private sector. This proposed rule is the
least burdensome alternative that
achieves this objective of U.S. policy.
Environmental Assessment
We have analyzed this proposed rule
for purposes of compliance with the
National Environmental Policy Act of
1969 (NEPA) (42 U.S.C. 4321 et seq.)
and have concluded that, under the
categorical exclusions provision in
section 4.05 of Maritime Administrative
Order (MAO) 600–1, ‘‘Procedures for
Considering Environmental Impacts,’’
50 FR 11606 (March 22, 1985), neither
the preparation of an Environmental
Assessment, an Environmental Impact
Statement, nor a Finding of No
Significant Impact for this rulemaking is
E:\FR\FM\08FEP1.SGM
08FEP1
6440
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 26 / Wednesday, February 8, 2006 / Proposed Rules
required. This proposed rule does not
change the environmental effects of the
current M&R Pilot program and thus no
further analysis under NEPA is
required.
Paperwork Reduction
In accordance with the Paperwork
Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3507
et seq.), this rulemaking contains no
new information collection and record
keeping requirements that require OMB
approval.
Privacy Act
Anyone is able to search the
electronic form of all comments
received into any of our dockets by the
name of the individual submitting the
comment (or signing the comment, if
submitted on behalf of an association,
business, labor union, etc.). You may
review DOT’s complete Privacy Act
Statement in the Federal Register
published on April 11, 2000 (Volume
65, Number 70; Pages 19477–78) or you
may visit https://dms.dot.gov.
List of Subjects in 46 CFR Part 296
Assistance payments, Maritime
carriers, Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements.
Accordingly, 46 CFR Chapter II,
Subchapter C, Part 296 is proposed to be
amended as follows:
PART 296—MARITIME SECURITY
PROGRAM (MSP)
1. The authority citation for part 296
is revised to read as follows:
Authority: Pub. L. 108–136, Pub. L. 109–
163, 117 Stat. 1392; 46 App. U.S.C. 1114(b),
49 CFR 1.66.
2. Amend § 296.60 by revising
paragraphs (b), (c), (d), (e), and (f) and
adding new paragraph (g) to read as
follows.
§ 296.60
Applications.
rmajette on PROD1PC67 with PROPOSALS1
*
*
*
*
*
(b) Every Contractor shall agree as a
condition of participation in MSP that it
will accept when offered an agreement
under 46 U.S.C. 3517, to perform
qualified M&R of one or more MSP
vessels that normally make port calls in
the United States, in United States
shipyards, subject to terms set forth
below. In this section the term
‘‘qualified M&R’’ means:
(1) Except as provided in paragraph
(b)(2) of this section:
(i) Any inspection of a vessel that is—
(A) Required under chapter 33 of title
46, United States Code; and
(B) Performed in the period in which
the vessel is subject to an agreement
under this section;
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:24 Feb 07, 2006
Jkt 208001
(ii) Any M&R of a vessel that is
determined, in the course of an
inspection referred to in paragraph
(b)(1)(i) of this section, to be necessary;
and
(iii) Any additional M&R the
Contractor intends to undertake at the
same time as the work described in
paragraph (b)(1)(ii) of this section; and
(2) Does not include:
(i) M&R not agreed to by the
Contractor to be undertaken at the same
time as the work described in paragraph
(b)(1) of this section; or
(ii) Routine M&R or any emergency
work that is necessary to enable a vessel
to return to a port in the United States.
(c) The Administrator will offer M&R
agreements only to the extent that
funding for the M&R program is
provided for by appropriations
legislation. Following the enactment of
any such appropriations legislation, the
Administrator will canvass the
Contractors to determine which
Contractors desire to volunteer for the
M&R program. If no MSP Contractor
volunteers for the M&R program, the
Administrator will select the
participants in the M&R program on the
basis of available funds and a review of
the Contractors’ vessels and ocean
freight service. The Administrator will
establish with the Contractors specific
M&R programs that provide the greatest
assistance to United States shipyards
within the available funding, while
minimizing any disruption to the
Contractors’ ocean freight service.
(d) Terms of Agreement. An
agreement under this section:
(1) Will require that except as
provided in paragraph (e) of this
section, all qualified M&R on the vessel
will be performed in the United States;
(2) Will require that the Administrator
will reimburse the Contractor in
accordance with paragraph (f) of this
section for the costs of qualified M&R
performed in the United States; and
(3) Will apply to qualified M&R
performed during the 5-year period
beginning on the date the vessel begins
operating under the operating agreement
under chapter 531 of title 46, United
States Code.
(e) Exception to requirement to
perform work in the United States. A
Contractor will not be required to have
qualified M&R work performed in the
United States under this section if:
(1) The Administrator determines that
there is no facility capable of meeting all
technical requirements of the qualified
M&R in the United States located in the
geographic area in which the vessel
normally operates available to perform
the work in the time required by the
PO 00000
Frm 00042
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
Contractor to maintain its regularly
scheduled service;
(2) The Administrator determines that
there are insufficient funds to pay
reimbursement under paragraph (f) of
this section with respect to the work; or
(3) The Administrator fails to make
the certification described in paragraph
(g)(2) of this section.
(f) Reimbursement. (1) In general. The
Administrator will, subject to the
availability of appropriations, reimburse
a Contractor for costs incurred by the
Contractor for qualified M&R performed
in the United States under this section.
(2) Amount. The amount of
reimbursement will be equal to the
difference between—
(i) The fair and reasonable cost of
obtaining the qualified M&R in the
United States; and
(ii) The fair and reasonable cost of
obtaining the qualified M&R outside the
United States, in the country in which
the Contractor would otherwise
undertake the qualified M&R.
(3) Determination of fair and
reasonable costs. The Administrator
will determine fair and reasonable costs
for purposes of paragraph (f)(2) of this
section.
(i) In order to determine the fair and
reasonable cost of obtaining qualified
M&R work in the United States, the
Maritime Administrator will require,
and Contractors will provide,
supporting documentation outlining
such costs, including shipyard
contracts, etc.
(ii) In order to determine the fair and
reasonable cost of obtaining qualified
M&R work in the foreign country where
the Contractor would otherwise
undertake the qualified M&R work, the
Maritime Administrator will require,
and Contractors will provide,
supporting documentation outlining
such costs.
(g) Notification Requirements. (1)
Notification by contractor. The
Administrator is not required to pay
reimbursement to a Contractor under
this section for qualified M&R, unless
the Contractor—
(i) Notifies the Administrator of the
intent of the Contractor to obtain the
qualified M&R, by not later than 90 days
before the date of the performance of the
qualified M&R; and
(ii) Includes in such notification:
(A) A description of all qualified M&R
that the Contractor should reasonably
expect may be performed;
(B) A description of the vessel’s
normal route and port calls in the
United States;
(C) An estimate of the cost, with
supporting documentation, of obtaining
the qualified M&R described under
E:\FR\FM\08FEP1.SGM
08FEP1
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 26 / Wednesday, February 8, 2006 / Proposed Rules
rmajette on PROD1PC67 with PROPOSALS1
paragraph (g)(1)(ii)(A) of this section in
the United States; and
(D) An estimate of the cost, with
supporting documentation, of obtaining
the qualified M&R described under
paragraph (g)(1)(ii)(A) of this section
outside the United States, in the country
in which the Contractor otherwise
would undertake the qualified M&R.
(2) Certification by Administrator. (i)
Not later than 30 days after the date of
receipt of notification under paragraph
(g)(1)(ii)(A) of this section, the
Administrator will certify to the
Contractor—
(A) Whether the cost estimates
provided by the Contractor are fair and
reasonable;
(B) If the Administrator determines
that such cost estimates are not fair and
reasonable, the Administrator’s estimate
of fair and reasonable costs for such
work;
(C) Whether there are available to the
Administrator sufficient funds to pay
reimbursement under paragraph (d) of
this section with respect to such work;
and
(D) That the Administrator commits
such funds to the Contractor for such
reimbursement, if such funds are
available for that purpose.
(ii) If the Contractor notification
described in paragraph (g)(1) of this
section does not include an estimate of
the cost of obtaining qualified M&R in
the United States, then not later than 30
days after the date of receipt of such
notification, the Administrator will:
(A) Certify to the Contractor whether
there is a facility capable of meeting all
technical requirements of the qualified
M&R in the United States located in the
geographic area in which the vessel
normally operates available to perform
the qualified M&R described in the
notification by the Contractor under
paragraph (g)(1) of this section in the
time period required by the Contractor
to maintain its regularly scheduled
service; and
(B) If there is such a facility, require
the Contractor to resubmit such
notification with the required cost
estimate for such facility.
(Authority: 49 CFR 1.66)
By Order of the Maritime Administrator.
Dated: February 3, 2006.
Joel C. Richard,
Secretary, Maritime Administration.
[FR Doc. E6–1691 Filed 2–7–06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–81–P
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:24 Feb 07, 2006
Jkt 208001
FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS
COMMISSION
47 CFR Part 73
[DA 06–109; MB Docket No. 06–11, RM–
11304]
Radio Broadcasting Services; Crowell,
TX
Federal Communications
Commission.
ACTION: Proposed rule.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: This document sets forth a
proposal to amend the FM Table of
Allotments, Section 73.202(b) of the
Commission’s rules, 47 CFR 73.202(b).
The Commission requests comment on
a petition filed by Jeraldine Anderson.
Petitioner proposes the allotment of
Channel 250A at Crowell, Texas, as a
potential second local service. Channel
250A can be allotted at Crowell in
compliance with the Commission’s
minimum distance separation
requirements with a site restriction of
4.7 km (2.9 miles) west of Crowell. The
proposed coordinates for Channel 250A
at Crowell are 34–00–00 North Latitude
and 99–46–18 West Longitude. See
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION infra.
DATES: Comments must be filed on or
before March 13, 2006, and reply
comments on or before March 28, 2006.
ADDRESSES: Federal Communications
Commission, Washington, DC 20554. In
addition to filing comments with the
FCC, interested parties should serve the
designated petitioner as follows:
Jeraldine Anderson, 1702 Cypress Drive,
Irving, Texas 75061; Gene A. Bechtel,
Esq., Law Office of Gene Bechtel, Suite
600, 1050 17th Street, NW., Washington,
DC 20036.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Deborah A. Dupont, Media Bureau (202)
418–7072.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This is a
synopsis of the Commission’s Notice of
Proposed Rule Making, MB Docket No.
06–11, adopted January 18, 2006, and
released January 20, 2006. The full text
of this Commission decision is available
for inspection and copying during
normal business hours in the FCC
Reference Information Center (Room
CY–A257), 445 12th Street, SW.,
Washington, DC. The complete text of
this decision may also be purchased
from the Commission’s copy contractor,
Best Copy and Printing, Inc., 445 12th
Street, SW., Room CY–B402,
Washington, DC 20554, (800) 378–3160,
or via the company’s Web site, https://
www.bcpiweb.com. This document does
not contain proposed information
collection requirements subject to the
PO 00000
Frm 00043
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
6441
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995,
Public Law 104–13. In addition,
therefore, it does not contain any
proposed information collection burden
‘‘for small business concerns with fewer
than 25 employees,’’ pursuant to the
Small Business Paperwork Relief Act of
2002, Public Law 107–198, see 44 U.S.C.
3506(C)(4).
The Provisions of the Regulatory
Flexibility Act of 1980 do not apply to
this proceeding. Members of the public
should note that from the time a Notice
of Proposed Rule Making is issued until
the matter is no longer subject to
Commission consideration or court
review, all ex parte contacts are
prohibited in Commission proceedings,
such as this one, which involve channel
allotments. See 47 CFR 1.1204(b) for
rules governing permissible ex parte
contacts.
For information regarding proper
filing procedures for comments, see 47
CFR 1.415 and 1.420.
List of Subjects in 47 CFR Part 73
Radio, Radio broadcasting.
For the reasons discussed in the
preamble, the Federal Communications
Commission proposes to amend 47 CFR
part 73 as follows:
PART 73—RADIO BROADCAST
SERVICES
1. The authority citation for part 73
continues to read as follows:
Authority: 47 U.S.C. 154, 303, 334 and 336.
§ 73.202
[Amended]
2. Section 73.202(b), the Table of FM
Allotments under Texas, is amended by
adding Channel 250A at Crowell.
Federal Communications Commission.
John A. Karousos,
Assistant Chief, Audio Division, Media
Bureau.
[FR Doc. 06–1064 Filed 2–7–06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6712–01–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
National Highway Traffic Safety
Administration
49 CFR Part 571
[Docket No. NHTSA–2006–23634]
RIN 2127–AJ75
Federal Motor Vehicle Safety
Standards; Lamps, Reflective Devices,
and Associated Equipment; Correction
National Highway Traffic
Safety Administration, DOT.
ACTION: Proposed rule; correction.
AGENCY:
E:\FR\FM\08FEP1.SGM
08FEP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 71, Number 26 (Wednesday, February 8, 2006)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 6438-6441]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E6-1691]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Maritime Administration
46 CFR Part 296
[Docket No. MARAD-2006-23804]
RIN 2133-AB68
Maintenance and Repair Reimbursement Pilot Program
AGENCY: Maritime Administration, Department of Transportation.
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: This proposed rule will amend the Maritime Administration's
(MARAD's) regulations governing its pilot program for the reimbursement
of costs of qualified maintenance and repair (M&R) of Maritime Security
Program (MSP) vessels performed in United States shipyards. Under
Public Law 109-163, the Secretary of Transportation, acting through the
Maritime Administrator, is directed to implement regulations that,
among other things, replace MARAD's voluntary M&R reimbursement program
with a mandatory system.
DATES: Comments are due by April 10, 2006.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments [identified by DOT DMS Docket Number
MARAD-2006-23804] by any of the following methods:
Web Site: https://dms.dot.gov. Follow the instructions for
submitting
[[Page 6439]]
comments on the DOT electronic docket site.
Fax: 1-202-493-2251.
Mail: Docket Management Facility; U.S. Department of
Transportation, 400 Seventh Street, SW., Nassif Building, Room PL-401,
Washington, DC 20590-001.
Hand Delivery: Room PL-401 on the plaza level of the
Nassif Building, 400 Seventh Street, SW., Washington, DC, between 9
a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal Holidays.
Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to https://
www.regulations.gov. Follow the online instructions for submitting
comments.
Instructions: All submissions must include the agency name and
docket number or Regulatory Identification Number (RIN) for this
rulemaking. Note that all comments received will be posted without
change to https://dms.dot.gov including any personal information
provided. Please see the Privacy Act heading under Rulemaking Notices.
Docket: For access to the docket to read background documents or
comments received, go to https://dms.dot.gov at any time or to Room PL-
401 on the plaza level of the Nassif Building, 400 Seventh Street, SW.,
Washington, DC, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m. (EST or EDT), Monday through
Friday, except Federal Holidays.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jean E. McKeever, Associate
Administrator for Marine Asset Development, Maritime Administration,
400 Seventh Street, SW., Washington, DC 20590; phone: (202) 366-5737;
fax: (202) 366-3511; or e-mail Jean.McKeever@dot.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
The Maritime Security Program (MSP) was established to maintain a
modern U.S.-flag fleet of commercially viable, militarily useful,
privately-owned vessels for national defense needs and to maintain a
strong U.S. presence in international maritime trade. Under the MSP,
the U.S. Government contracts with certain operators of U.S.-flag
commercial vessels to be on call for service when needed in times of
national emergency or war.
The original MSP was established by the Maritime Security Act of
1996 (Pub. L. 104-239, Oct. 8, 1996) for fiscal years 1996 through
2005. On November 24, 2003, President Bush signed the Maritime Security
Act of 2003 (MSA 2003) (part of the National Defense Authorization Act
for Fiscal Year 2004) which reauthorized the MSP for fiscal years 2006
through 2015.
In addition to reauthorizing the MSP, section 3517 of the MSA 2003
established a voluntary pilot program under which the Secretary of
Transportation could enter into agreement(s) to reimburse MSP vessel
operators for the costs of qualified maintenance and repairs performed
in U.S. shipyards instead of foreign shipyards. Reimbursement levels
under the voluntary program were established at 80% of the difference
between the fair and reasonable cost of obtaining qualified M&R work in
U.S. shipyards and the cost of qualified M&R work in foreign shipyards.
MARAD promulgated implementing regulations for this program at 46 CFR
section 296.60 (70 FR 55581, Sept. 22, 2005).
Under Public Law 109-163, enacted on January 6, 2006, the Secretary
of Transportation is directed to implement regulations to replace the
voluntary M&R reimbursement program with a mandatory program. Under the
mandatory program, MARAD must enter into an agreement with one or more
MSP Contractors, subject to appropriations, for the M&R of one or more
vessels that are subject to a MSP operating agreement. Under Public Law
109-163, reimbursement levels are established at 100% of the difference
between the fair and reasonable cost of obtaining qualified M&R work in
U.S. shipyards and the cost of qualified M&R work in foreign shipyards.
Public Comment
MARAD welcomes public comments regarding the M&R pilot program and,
in particular, suggestions regarding what documentation Contractors
could provide to assist MARAD in determining the fair and reasonable
cost of obtaining qualified M&R work in U.S. shipyards as well as in
the foreign shipyards where Contractors would otherwise undertake such
work.
Rulemaking Analyses and Notices
Executive Order 12866 (Regulatory Planning and Review), and Department
of Transportation (DOT) Regulatory Policies; Pub. L. 104-121
This proposed rule is not considered a significant regulatory
action under section 3(f) of Executive Order 12866 and, therefore, was
not reviewed by the Office of Management and Budget. This proposed rule
is not likely to result in an annual effect on the economy of $100
million or more. This proposed rule is also not significant under the
Regulatory Policies and Procedures of the Department of Transportation
(44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979). The costs and economic impact
associated with this rulemaking are considered to be so minimal that no
further analysis is necessary.
Executive Order 13132
We have analyzed this rulemaking in accordance with the principles
and criteria contained in Executive Order 13132 (``Federalism'') and
have determined that it does not have sufficient Federalism
implications to warrant the preparation of a Federalism summary impact
statement. The regulations have no substantial effects on the States,
the current Federal-State relationship, or on the current distribution
of power and responsibilities among local officials. Therefore,
consultation with State and local officials was not necessary.
Executive Order 13175
MARAD does not believe that this proposed rule will significantly
or uniquely affect the communities of Indian tribal governments when
analyzed under the principles and criteria contained in Executive Order
13175 (Consultation and Coordination with Indian Tribal Governments).
Therefore, the funding and consultation requirements of this Executive
Order do not apply.
Regulatory Flexibility
The Maritime Administrator certifies that this proposed rule will
not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small
entities. We anticipate that no small entities will participate in this
program.
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995
This proposed rule will not impose an unfunded mandate under the
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995. It will not result in costs of
$100 million or more, in the aggregate, to any of the following: State,
local, or Native American tribal governments, or the private sector.
This proposed rule is the least burdensome alternative that achieves
this objective of U.S. policy.
Environmental Assessment
We have analyzed this proposed rule for purposes of compliance with
the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (NEPA) (42 U.S.C. 4321 et
seq.) and have concluded that, under the categorical exclusions
provision in section 4.05 of Maritime Administrative Order (MAO) 600-1,
``Procedures for Considering Environmental Impacts,'' 50 FR 11606
(March 22, 1985), neither the preparation of an Environmental
Assessment, an Environmental Impact Statement, nor a Finding of No
Significant Impact for this rulemaking is
[[Page 6440]]
required. This proposed rule does not change the environmental effects
of the current M&R Pilot program and thus no further analysis under
NEPA is required.
Paperwork Reduction
In accordance with the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C.
3507 et seq.), this rulemaking contains no new information collection
and record keeping requirements that require OMB approval.
Privacy Act
Anyone is able to search the electronic form of all comments
received into any of our dockets by the name of the individual
submitting the comment (or signing the comment, if submitted on behalf
of an association, business, labor union, etc.). You may review DOT's
complete Privacy Act Statement in the Federal Register published on
April 11, 2000 (Volume 65, Number 70; Pages 19477-78) or you may visit
https://dms.dot.gov.
List of Subjects in 46 CFR Part 296
Assistance payments, Maritime carriers, Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements.
Accordingly, 46 CFR Chapter II, Subchapter C, Part 296 is proposed
to be amended as follows:
PART 296--MARITIME SECURITY PROGRAM (MSP)
1. The authority citation for part 296 is revised to read as
follows:
Authority: Pub. L. 108-136, Pub. L. 109-163, 117 Stat. 1392; 46
App. U.S.C. 1114(b), 49 CFR 1.66.
2. Amend Sec. 296.60 by revising paragraphs (b), (c), (d), (e),
and (f) and adding new paragraph (g) to read as follows.
Sec. 296.60 Applications.
* * * * *
(b) Every Contractor shall agree as a condition of participation in
MSP that it will accept when offered an agreement under 46 U.S.C. 3517,
to perform qualified M&R of one or more MSP vessels that normally make
port calls in the United States, in United States shipyards, subject to
terms set forth below. In this section the term ``qualified M&R''
means:
(1) Except as provided in paragraph (b)(2) of this section:
(i) Any inspection of a vessel that is--
(A) Required under chapter 33 of title 46, United States Code; and
(B) Performed in the period in which the vessel is subject to an
agreement under this section;
(ii) Any M&R of a vessel that is determined, in the course of an
inspection referred to in paragraph (b)(1)(i) of this section, to be
necessary; and
(iii) Any additional M&R the Contractor intends to undertake at the
same time as the work described in paragraph (b)(1)(ii) of this
section; and
(2) Does not include:
(i) M&R not agreed to by the Contractor to be undertaken at the
same time as the work described in paragraph (b)(1) of this section; or
(ii) Routine M&R or any emergency work that is necessary to enable
a vessel to return to a port in the United States.
(c) The Administrator will offer M&R agreements only to the extent
that funding for the M&R program is provided for by appropriations
legislation. Following the enactment of any such appropriations
legislation, the Administrator will canvass the Contractors to
determine which Contractors desire to volunteer for the M&R program. If
no MSP Contractor volunteers for the M&R program, the Administrator
will select the participants in the M&R program on the basis of
available funds and a review of the Contractors' vessels and ocean
freight service. The Administrator will establish with the Contractors
specific M&R programs that provide the greatest assistance to United
States shipyards within the available funding, while minimizing any
disruption to the Contractors' ocean freight service.
(d) Terms of Agreement. An agreement under this section:
(1) Will require that except as provided in paragraph (e) of this
section, all qualified M&R on the vessel will be performed in the
United States;
(2) Will require that the Administrator will reimburse the
Contractor in accordance with paragraph (f) of this section for the
costs of qualified M&R performed in the United States; and
(3) Will apply to qualified M&R performed during the 5-year period
beginning on the date the vessel begins operating under the operating
agreement under chapter 531 of title 46, United States Code.
(e) Exception to requirement to perform work in the United States.
A Contractor will not be required to have qualified M&R work performed
in the United States under this section if:
(1) The Administrator determines that there is no facility capable
of meeting all technical requirements of the qualified M&R in the
United States located in the geographic area in which the vessel
normally operates available to perform the work in the time required by
the Contractor to maintain its regularly scheduled service;
(2) The Administrator determines that there are insufficient funds
to pay reimbursement under paragraph (f) of this section with respect
to the work; or
(3) The Administrator fails to make the certification described in
paragraph (g)(2) of this section.
(f) Reimbursement. (1) In general. The Administrator will, subject
to the availability of appropriations, reimburse a Contractor for costs
incurred by the Contractor for qualified M&R performed in the United
States under this section.
(2) Amount. The amount of reimbursement will be equal to the
difference between--
(i) The fair and reasonable cost of obtaining the qualified M&R in
the United States; and
(ii) The fair and reasonable cost of obtaining the qualified M&R
outside the United States, in the country in which the Contractor would
otherwise undertake the qualified M&R.
(3) Determination of fair and reasonable costs. The Administrator
will determine fair and reasonable costs for purposes of paragraph
(f)(2) of this section.
(i) In order to determine the fair and reasonable cost of obtaining
qualified M&R work in the United States, the Maritime Administrator
will require, and Contractors will provide, supporting documentation
outlining such costs, including shipyard contracts, etc.
(ii) In order to determine the fair and reasonable cost of
obtaining qualified M&R work in the foreign country where the
Contractor would otherwise undertake the qualified M&R work, the
Maritime Administrator will require, and Contractors will provide,
supporting documentation outlining such costs.
(g) Notification Requirements. (1) Notification by contractor. The
Administrator is not required to pay reimbursement to a Contractor
under this section for qualified M&R, unless the Contractor--
(i) Notifies the Administrator of the intent of the Contractor to
obtain the qualified M&R, by not later than 90 days before the date of
the performance of the qualified M&R; and
(ii) Includes in such notification:
(A) A description of all qualified M&R that the Contractor should
reasonably expect may be performed;
(B) A description of the vessel's normal route and port calls in
the United States;
(C) An estimate of the cost, with supporting documentation, of
obtaining the qualified M&R described under
[[Page 6441]]
paragraph (g)(1)(ii)(A) of this section in the United States; and
(D) An estimate of the cost, with supporting documentation, of
obtaining the qualified M&R described under paragraph (g)(1)(ii)(A) of
this section outside the United States, in the country in which the
Contractor otherwise would undertake the qualified M&R.
(2) Certification by Administrator. (i) Not later than 30 days
after the date of receipt of notification under paragraph (g)(1)(ii)(A)
of this section, the Administrator will certify to the Contractor--
(A) Whether the cost estimates provided by the Contractor are fair
and reasonable;
(B) If the Administrator determines that such cost estimates are
not fair and reasonable, the Administrator's estimate of fair and
reasonable costs for such work;
(C) Whether there are available to the Administrator sufficient
funds to pay reimbursement under paragraph (d) of this section with
respect to such work; and
(D) That the Administrator commits such funds to the Contractor for
such reimbursement, if such funds are available for that purpose.
(ii) If the Contractor notification described in paragraph (g)(1)
of this section does not include an estimate of the cost of obtaining
qualified M&R in the United States, then not later than 30 days after
the date of receipt of such notification, the Administrator will:
(A) Certify to the Contractor whether there is a facility capable
of meeting all technical requirements of the qualified M&R in the
United States located in the geographic area in which the vessel
normally operates available to perform the qualified M&R described in
the notification by the Contractor under paragraph (g)(1) of this
section in the time period required by the Contractor to maintain its
regularly scheduled service; and
(B) If there is such a facility, require the Contractor to resubmit
such notification with the required cost estimate for such facility.
(Authority: 49 CFR 1.66)
By Order of the Maritime Administrator.
Dated: February 3, 2006.
Joel C. Richard,
Secretary, Maritime Administration.
[FR Doc. E6-1691 Filed 2-7-06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-81-P