Carbon and Certain Alloy Steel Wire Rod from Ukraine: Notice of Rescission of Antidumping Administrative Review, 6265-6266 [E6-1634]
Download as PDF
<![CDATA[
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 25 / Tuesday, February 7, 2006 / Notices
February 22
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
Public Session
International Trade Administration
1. Opening Remarks and
Introductions.
2. Digital Rights Management (DRM)
and Consumer Products.
3. Mil-spec Qualification of
Semiconductors.
4. AMD Roadmap and Directions.
5. Arbitrary Waveform Generators.
6. Quality of Service (QoS) in VoIP
networks.
7. Robotics and Communications.
8. FPGAs in Defense Applications.
[A–823–812]
February 23
Closed Session
erjones on PROD1PC68 with NOTICES
9. Discussion of matters determined to
be exempt from the provisions relating
to public meetings found in 5 U.S.C.
app. 2 10(a)(1) and 10(a)(3).
A limited number of seats will be
available for the public session.
Reservations are not accepted. To the
extent time permits, members of the
public may present oral statements to
the Committee. The public may submit
written statements at any time before or
after the meeting. However, to facilitate
distribution of public presentation
materials to Committee members, the
Committee suggests that public
presentation materials or comments be
forwarded before the meeting to Ms.
Yvette Springer at
Yspringer@bis.doc.gov
The Assistant Secretary for
Administration, with the concurrence of
the delegate of the General Counsel,
formally determined on January 23,
2006, pursuant to Section 10(d) of the
Federal Advisory Committee Act, as
amended (5 U.S.C. app. 2 (10)(d)), that
portion of the meeting concerning trade
secrets and commercial or financial
information deemed privileged or
confidential as described in 5 U.S.C.
552b(c)(4) and the portion of the
meeting concerning matters the
disclosure of which would be likely to
frustrate significantly implementation of
an agency action as described in 5
U.S.C. 552b(c)(9)(B) shall be exempt
from the provisions relating to public
meetings found in 5 U.S.C. app. 2
10(a)(1) and 10(a)(3). The remaining
portions of the meeting will be open to
the public.
For more information, call Yvette
Springer at (202) 482–4814.
Dated: February 1, 2006.
Yvette Springer,
Committee Liaison Officer.
[FR Doc. 06–1109 Filed 2–6–06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–JT–M
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:23 Feb 06, 2006
Jkt 208001
Carbon and Certain Alloy Steel Wire
Rod from Ukraine: Notice of
Rescission of Antidumping
Administrative Review
Import Administration,
International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
SUMMARY: In response to a request from
JSC Kryvorizhstal, a Ukrainian producer
of carbon and certain alloy steel wire
rod, the Department of Commerce (the
Department) initiated an administrative
review of the antidumping duty order
on carbon and certain alloy steel wire
rod from Ukraine. See Initiation of
Antidumping and Countervailing Duty
Administrative Reviews and Deferral of
Administrative Reviews, 70 FR 72107
(December 1, 2005) (Initiation Notice).
The period of review (POR) covers
October 1, 2004, through September 30,
2005. We are now rescinding this
review because the respondent has
withdrawn its request within 90 days of
the initiation and is the only party to
have requested the review. The
respondent indicated that it is
withdrawing its request because it
realized, in preparing a response to the
Department’s questionnaire, that it did
not have any reviewable U.S.
transactions during the POR.
EFFECTIVE DATE: February 7, 2006.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Scot
Fullerton or Christopher Riker, AD/CVD
Operations, Office 9, Import
Administration, International Trade
Administration, U.S. Department of
Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution
Avenue, NW, Room 4003, Washington,
DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482–1386
and (202) 482–3441, respectively.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
AGENCY:
Background
The Department published an
antidumping order on carbon and
certain alloy steel wire rod from Ukraine
on October 29, 2002. See Notice of
Antidumping Duty Orders: Carbon and
Certain Alloy Steel Wire Rod from
Brazil, Indonesia, Mexico, Moldova,
Trinidad and Tobago, and Ukraine, 67
FR 65945 (October 29, 2002). On
October 3, 2005 the Department
published a notice of ‘‘Opportunity to
Request Administrative Review’’ of the
antidumping duty order for the period
of October 1, 2004 through September
30, 2005. See Antidumping or
Countervailing Duty Order, Finding, or
Suspended Investigation; Opportunity
PO 00000
Frm 00017
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
6265
to Request Administrative Review, 70
FR 57558 (October 3, 2005). In
accordance with 19 C.F.R. 351.213(b)(1),
on October 28, 2005, respondent, JSC
Kryvorizhstal, requested an
administrative review of this order. In
response to this request, the Department
published the initiation of the
antidumping duty administrative review
on carbon and certain alloy steel wire
rod from Ukraine on December 1, 2005.
See Initiation Notice.
On December 12, 2005, we issued an
antidumping questionnaire to JSC
Kryvorizhstal to which we did not
receive a response. However, on January
10, 2006, JSC Kryvorizhstal notified the
Department that it did not have any
reviewable U.S. transactions during the
POR, and requested that this review be
suspended or terminated.
See ‘‘Letter from JSC Kryvorizhstal re:
Request for Suspension or Termination
of Review’’ (January 10, 2006). If by
requesting a ‘‘suspension,’’ JSC
Kryvorizhstal meant to request a
‘‘deferral,’’ pursuant to section
351.213(c) of the Department’s
regulations, we note that a deferral is
not appropriate here, as a deferral may
only be requested prior to initiation of
a review. As this review has already
been initiated, we cannot defer the
review. We address JSC Kryvorizhstal’s
alternative request for a ‘‘termination,’’
below.
Rescission of the Administrative
Review
The Department’s regulations at
section 351.213(d)(1) provide that it will
rescind an administrative review if the
party that requested the review
withdraws its request within 90 days of
the date of publication of the notice of
initiation of the requested review, or
withdraws its request at a later date, if
the Department determines that it is
reasonable to extend the time limit for
withdrawing the request. The
respondent was the only party to
request this review and properly
withdrew its request, by requesting
termination of the review, within the
90–day period. Accordingly, we are
rescinding this administrative review.
The Department will issue
appropriate assessment instructions to
U.S. Customs and Border Protection
within 15 days of publication of this
notice. This notice serves as a reminder
to parties subject to administrative
protective order (APO) of their
responsibility concerning the
disposition of proprietary information
disclosed under APO in accordance
with 19 CFR 351.305(a)(3). Timely
written notification of the return or
destruction of APO materials or
E:\FR\FM\07FEN1.SGM
07FEN1
6266
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 25 / Tuesday, February 7, 2006 / Notices
conversion to judicial protective order is
hereby requested. Failure to comply
with the regulations and terms of an
APO is a sanctionable violation.
This notice is issued and published in
accordance with 19 CFR 351.213(d)(4)
and section 777(i)(1) of the Tariff Act of
1930, as amended.
Dated: January 31, 2006.
Stephen J. Claeys,
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Import
Administration.
[FR Doc. E6–1634 Filed 2–6–06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–DS–S
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
[A–552–801]
Certain Frozen Fish Fillets from the
Socialist Republic of Vietnam:
Rescission, in Part, and Extension of
Time Limit for Preliminary Results of
the Second Antidumping Duty
Administrative Review
Import Administration,
International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
EFFECTIVE DATE: February 7, 2006.
SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce
(the ‘‘Department’’) is partially
rescinding the administrative review of
eighteen companies under the
antidumping duty order on certain
frozen fish fillets from the Socialist
Republic of Vietnam (‘‘Vietnam’’) for the
period of review (‘‘POR’’), August 1,
2004, through July 31, 2005. This partial
rescission covers 18 companies for
which the Department received a timely
withdrawal of the request for review
and a company which had no entries,
exports, or sales of the subject
merchandise during the POR. A
complete list of the companies for
which the administrative review is
being rescinded is provided in the
‘‘Rescission, in Part, of Administrative
Review’’ section below. The Department
is not rescinding the review with
respect to An Giang Agriculture
Technology Service Company
(‘‘ANTESCO’’); Anhaco; Binh Dinh
Import Export Company (‘‘Binh Dinh’’);
QVD Food Company, Ltd. (‘‘QVD’’); Can
Tho Animal Fishery Products
Processing Export Enterprise
(‘‘Cafatex’’); Mekongfish Company
(‘‘Mekonimex’’); Can Tho Agricultural
and Animal Products Import Export
Company (‘‘CATACO’’); An Giang
Agriculture and Food Import Export
Company (‘‘Afiex’’); Phan Quan Trading
Co., Ltd. (‘‘Phan Quan’’); Nam Viet
Company Limited (‘‘Navico’’); and Vinh
erjones on PROD1PC68 with NOTICES
AGENCY:
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:20 Feb 06, 2006
Jkt 208001
Long Import–Export Company (‘‘Vinh
Long’’).
Additionally, for the reasons
discussed below, the Department is
extending the preliminary results of this
administrative review by an additional
120 days, to no later than August 31,
2006.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Julia
Hancock or Cindy Robinson, AD/CVD
Operations, Office 9, Import
Administration, International Trade
Administration, U.S. Department of
Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution
Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20230;
telephone: (202) 482–1394 and (202)
482–3797, respectively.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Hoan’’); CATACO; Afiex; Phan Quan;
and Navico. Additionally, the following
six exporters individually requested a
review: QVD; Vinh Hoan; CATACO;
Afiex; Phan Quan; and Navico. No other
interested party requested a review.
On September 28, 2005, the
Department published its notice of
initiation of an antidumping
administrative review on certain frozen
fish fillets from Vietnam. See Initiation
of Antidumping and Countervailing
Duty Administrative Reviews and
Request for Revocation in Part, 70 FR
56631 (September 28, 2005) (‘‘Initiation
Notice’’). We initiated the review
covering all 29 companies for which an
administrative review was requested.
Background
On August 1, 2005, the Department
published a notice of an opportunity to
request an administrative review on the
antidumping duty order on certain
frozen fish fillets from Vietnam. See
Antidumping or Countervailing Duty
Order, Finding, or Suspended
Investigation; Notice of Opportunity To
Request Administrative Review, 70 FR
44085 (August 1, 2005) (‘‘Notice of
Opportunity’’); Notice of Antidumping
Duty Order: Certain Frozen Fish Fillets
from the Socialist Republic of Vietnam,
68 FR 47909 (August 12, 2003)
(‘‘Order’’). Pursuant to its Notice of
Opportunity, and in accordance with
section 751(a)(1)(B) of the Tariff Act of
1930, as amended (‘‘the Act’’), and
section 351.213(b) of the Department’s
regulations, the Department received a
request from the Catfish Farmers of
America and individual U.S. catfish
processors (collectively, ‘‘Petitioners’’)
for a review covering twenty–nine
exporters. These twenty–nine exporters
are: An Giang Fisheries Import and
Export Joint Stock Company (‘‘Agifish’’);
ANTESCO; Anhaco; Bamboo Food Co.,
Ltd. (‘‘Bamboo Food’’); Binh Dinh; Da
Nang Seaproducts Import–Export
Corporation (‘‘Danang’’); Duyen Hai
Foodstuffs Processing Factory
(‘‘Coseafex’’); Gepimex 404 Company
(‘‘Gepimex’’); Hai Vuong Co., Ltd. (‘‘Hai
Vuong’’); Kien Giang Ltd. (‘‘Kien
Giang’’); Mekonimex; Phuoc My
Seafoods Processing Factory (‘‘Phuoc
My’’); Phu Thanh Frozen Factory (‘‘Phu
Thanh’’); Seaprodex Saigon; Tan Thanh
Loi Frozen Food Co., Ltd. (‘‘Tan Thanh
Loi’’); Thangloi Frozen Food Enterprise
(‘‘Thangloi Frozen Food’’); Thanh Viet
Co., Ltd. (‘‘Thanh Viet’’); Thuan Hung
Co., Ltd. (‘‘Thuan Hung’’); Tin Thinh
Co., Ltd. (‘‘Tin Thinh’’); Vifaco; Vinh
Long; Viet Hai Seafood Company
Limited (‘‘Vietnam Fish–One’’); QVD;
Vinh Hoan Company Limited (‘‘Vinh
Withdrawal of Requests for Review
PO 00000
Frm 00018
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
On November 21, 2005, Petitioners
withdrew their request with respect to
the following fourteen exporters that did
not individually request a review:
Bamboo Food; Coaseafex; Gepimex; Hai
Vuong; Kien Giang; Phu Thanh; Phuoc
My; Seaprodex Saigon; Tan Thanh Loi;
Thangloi Frozen Food ; Thanh Viet;
Thuan Hung; Tin Thinh; and Vifaco.
Additionally, Petitioners withdrew their
request with respect to the following
three companies that did individually
request a review: Afiex; Phan Quan; and
Vinh Hoan.
On December 23, 2003, Vinh Hoan
withdrew its request for an
administrative review. Additionally, on
December 23, 2005, H&N Foods
International (‘‘H&N’’), a U.S. importer
of the subject merchandise, requested
that the Department extend the deadline
for withdrawing requests for review by
30 days.
On December 27, 2005, Vinh Hoan
submitted a letter to the Department
requesting that its withdrawal letter
dated December 23, 2005, be
disregarded. Additionally, on December
27, 2005, the Department extended by
ten days the deadline that parties which
requested an administrative review of
this Order may withdraw their request,
from December 27, 2005, to January 6,
2006.
On January 5, 2006, H&N requested
that the Department extend the deadline
for withdrawing requests for review
until two days after the Department’s
issuance of its decision regarding
respondent selection. On January 9,
2006, Vinh Hoan again withdrew its
request for a review.
On January 11, 2006, Petitioners
withdrew their request with respect to
two additional companies, Danang and
Agifish, both of which did not
individually request a review.
Petitioners also did not object to Vinh
E:\FR\FM\07FEN1.SGM
07FEN1
]]>Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 71, Number 25 (Tuesday, February 7, 2006)]
[Notices]
[Pages 6265-6266]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E6-1634]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
[A-823-812]
Carbon and Certain Alloy Steel Wire Rod from Ukraine: Notice of
Rescission of Antidumping Administrative Review
AGENCY: Import Administration, International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
SUMMARY: In response to a request from JSC Kryvorizhstal, a Ukrainian
producer of carbon and certain alloy steel wire rod, the Department of
Commerce (the Department) initiated an administrative review of the
antidumping duty order on carbon and certain alloy steel wire rod from
Ukraine. See Initiation of Antidumping and Countervailing Duty
Administrative Reviews and Deferral of Administrative Reviews, 70 FR
72107 (December 1, 2005) (Initiation Notice). The period of review
(POR) covers October 1, 2004, through September 30, 2005. We are now
rescinding this review because the respondent has withdrawn its request
within 90 days of the initiation and is the only party to have
requested the review. The respondent indicated that it is withdrawing
its request because it realized, in preparing a response to the
Department's questionnaire, that it did not have any reviewable U.S.
transactions during the POR.
EFFECTIVE DATE: February 7, 2006.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Scot Fullerton or Christopher Riker,
AD/CVD Operations, Office 9, Import Administration, International Trade
Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th Street and
Constitution Avenue, NW, Room 4003, Washington, DC 20230; telephone:
(202) 482-1386 and (202) 482-3441, respectively.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
The Department published an antidumping order on carbon and certain
alloy steel wire rod from Ukraine on October 29, 2002. See Notice of
Antidumping Duty Orders: Carbon and Certain Alloy Steel Wire Rod from
Brazil, Indonesia, Mexico, Moldova, Trinidad and Tobago, and Ukraine,
67 FR 65945 (October 29, 2002). On October 3, 2005 the Department
published a notice of ``Opportunity to Request Administrative Review''
of the antidumping duty order for the period of October 1, 2004 through
September 30, 2005. See Antidumping or Countervailing Duty Order,
Finding, or Suspended Investigation; Opportunity to Request
Administrative Review, 70 FR 57558 (October 3, 2005). In accordance
with 19 C.F.R. 351.213(b)(1), on October 28, 2005, respondent, JSC
Kryvorizhstal, requested an administrative review of this order. In
response to this request, the Department published the initiation of
the antidumping duty administrative review on carbon and certain alloy
steel wire rod from Ukraine on December 1, 2005. See Initiation Notice.
On December 12, 2005, we issued an antidumping questionnaire to JSC
Kryvorizhstal to which we did not receive a response. However, on
January 10, 2006, JSC Kryvorizhstal notified the Department that it did
not have any reviewable U.S. transactions during the POR, and requested
that this review be suspended or terminated.
See ``Letter from JSC Kryvorizhstal re: Request for Suspension or
Termination of Review'' (January 10, 2006). If by requesting a
``suspension,'' JSC Kryvorizhstal meant to request a ``deferral,''
pursuant to section 351.213(c) of the Department's regulations, we note
that a deferral is not appropriate here, as a deferral may only be
requested prior to initiation of a review. As this review has already
been initiated, we cannot defer the review. We address JSC
Kryvorizhstal's alternative request for a ``termination,'' below.
Rescission of the Administrative Review
The Department's regulations at section 351.213(d)(1) provide that
it will rescind an administrative review if the party that requested
the review withdraws its request within 90 days of the date of
publication of the notice of initiation of the requested review, or
withdraws its request at a later date, if the Department determines
that it is reasonable to extend the time limit for withdrawing the
request. The respondent was the only party to request this review and
properly withdrew its request, by requesting termination of the review,
within the 90-day period. Accordingly, we are rescinding this
administrative review.
The Department will issue appropriate assessment instructions to
U.S. Customs and Border Protection within 15 days of publication of
this notice. This notice serves as a reminder to parties subject to
administrative protective order (APO) of their responsibility
concerning the disposition of proprietary information disclosed under
APO in accordance with 19 CFR 351.305(a)(3). Timely written
notification of the return or destruction of APO materials or
[[Page 6266]]
conversion to judicial protective order is hereby requested. Failure to
comply with the regulations and terms of an APO is a sanctionable
violation.
This notice is issued and published in accordance with 19 CFR
351.213(d)(4) and section 777(i)(1) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as
amended.
Dated: January 31, 2006.
Stephen J. Claeys,
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Import Administration.
[FR Doc. E6-1634 Filed 2-6-06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-S
