Petition for Exemption From the Vehicle Theft Prevention Standard; Volkswagen, 4966-4967 [E6-1073]
Download as PDF
4966
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 19 / Monday, January 30, 2006 / Notices
of petitions ‘‘to modify an exemption to
permit the use of an antitheft device
similar to but differing from the one
specified in that exemption.’’
The agency wishes to minimize the
administrative burden that Part
543.9(c)(2) could place on exempted
vehicle manufacturers and itself. The
agency did not intend Part 543 to
require the submission of a modification
petition for every change to the
components or design of an antitheft
device. The significance of many such
changes could be de minimis. Therefore,
NHTSA suggests that if the
manufacturer contemplates making any
changes, the effects of which might be
characterized as de minimis, it should
consult the agency before preparing and
submitting a petition to modify.
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 33106; delegation of
authority at 49 CFR 1.50.
Issued on: January 23, 2006.
Stephen R. Kratzke,
Associate Administrator for Rulemaking.
[FR Doc. E6–1070 Filed 1–27–06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–59–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
National Highway Traffic Safety
Administration
Petition for Exemption From the
Vehicle Theft Prevention Standard;
Volkswagen
National Highway Traffic
Safety Administration (NHTSA)
Department of Transportation (DOT).
ACTION: Grant of petition for exemption.
cprice-sewell on PROD1PC66 with NOTICES
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: This document grants in full
the petition of Volkswagen of America,
Inc. (VW) in accordance with
§ 543.9(c)(2) of 49 CFR Part 543,
Exemption from the Theft Prevention
Standard, for the Audi A4 vehicle line
beginning with model year (MY) 2007.
This petition is granted because the
agency has determined that the antitheft
device to be placed on the line as
standard equipment is likely to be as
effective in reducing and deterring
motor vehicle theft as compliance with
the parts-marking requirements of the
Theft Prevention Standard. In a letter
dated October 19, 2005, the agency
granted the petitioner’s request for
confidential treatment of most aspects of
its petition.
DATES: The exemption granted by this
notice is effective beginning with model
year (MY) 2007.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms.
Deborah Mazyck, Office of International
Policy, Fuel Economy and Consumer
VerDate Aug<31>2005
14:07 Jan 27, 2006
Jkt 208001
Programs, NHTSA, 400 Seventh Street,
SW., Washington, DC 20590. Ms.
Mazyck’s telephone number is (202)
366–0846. Her fax number is (202) 493–
2290.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In a
petition dated September 26, 2005, VW
requested exemption from the partsmarking requirements of the theft
prevention standard (49 CFR part 541)
for the MY 2007 Audi A4 vehicle line.
The petition requested exemption from
parts-marking pursuant to 49 CFR part
543, Exemption from Vehicle Theft
Prevention Standard, based on the
installation of an antitheft device as
standard equipment for an entire
vehicle line.
Under § 543.5(a), a manufacturer may
petition NHTSA to grant exemptions for
one line of its vehicle lines per year. In
its petition, VW provided a detailed
description and diagram of the identity,
design, and location of the components
of the antitheft device for the new
vehicle line. VW will install its passive,
antitheft device as standard equipment
beginning with MY 2007. Features of
the antitheft device will include the
immobilizer control unit, the reading
coil on the ignition lock, the engine
control unit, a transponder-based
ignition key, a remote key fob and a
visable and audible alarm. VW’s
submission is considered a complete
petition as required by 49 CFR 543.7, in
that it meets the general requirements
contained in 543.5 and the specific
content requirements of 543.6.
VW’s proposed device incorporates an
immobilizer feature, tow away
protection and an audible and visual
alarm system. VW stated that the device
is switched on by turning the key in
either of the front door locks to the lock
position, or by locking the vehicle with
the remote key fob. The A4’s
immobilizer prevents the vehicle from
being operated by unauthorized
persons. When the ignition key is
turned to the ‘‘on’’ position, the key’s
transporter, the immobilizer control
unit, and the engine control unit initiate
a complex set of tests to determine if
vehicle start-up should be enabled. If
the tests fail, the vehicle cannot be
started. Additionally, the audible alarm
and emergency flashers are activated if
any of the protected areas of the vehicle
are violated. The protected areas
include the doors, trunk or hatch, hood,
activation of ignition lock voltage and
tilt.
In addressing the specific content
requirements of 543.6, VW provided
information on the reliability and
durability of its proposed device. To
ensure reliability and durability of the
PO 00000
Frm 00077
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
device, VW conducted tests based on its
own specified standards. VW provided
a detailed list of the tests conducted,
including those for electrical and
mechanical durability and believes that
the device is reliable and durable since
it complied with VW’s specified
requirements for each test.
VW also provided information on the
theft rate history for previous MY
vehicles installed with a similar device
as that proposed. VW indicated that the
theft rates for the Audi A4 vehicle line
have been significantly below the
median. NHTSA’s theft rates for the A4
vehicle for model years 2000 through
2003 were 1.2433, 1.6561, 1.8970, and
0.8418, respectively.
On the basis of this comparison, VW
has concluded that the proposed
antitheft device is no less effective than
those devices installed on lines for
which NHTSA has already granted full
exemption from the parts-marking
requirements.
Based on the evidence submitted by
VW, the agency believes that the
antitheft device for the A4 vehicle line
is likely to be as effective in reducing
and deterring motor vehicle theft as
compliance with the parts-marking
requirements of the Theft Prevention
Standard (49 CFR Part 541).
The agency concludes that the device
will provide the five types of
performance listed in § 543.6(a)(3):
promoting activation; attracting
attention to the efforts of unauthorized
persons to enter or operate a vehicle by
means other than a key; preventing
defeat or circumvention of the device by
unauthorized persons; preventing
operation of the vehicle by
unauthorized entrants; and ensuring the
reliability and durability of the device.
As required by 49 U.S.C. 33106 and
49 CFR 543.6 (a)(4) and (5), the agency
finds that VW has provided adequate
reasons for its belief that the antitheft
device will reduce and deter theft. This
conclusion is based on the information
VW provided about its device, much of
which is confidential. For the foregoing
reasons, the agency hereby grants in full
VW’s petition for exemption for the A4
vehicle line from the parts-marking
requirements of 49 CFR part 541. The
agency notes that 49 CFR part 541,
Appendix A–1, identifies those lines
that are exempted from the Theft
Prevention Standard for a given model
year. 49 CFR part 543.7(f) contains
publication requirements incident to the
disposition of all Part 543 petitions.
Advanced listing, including the release
of future product nameplates, the
beginning model year for which the
exemption is granted and a general
description of the device is necessary in
E:\FR\FM\30JAN1.SGM
30JAN1
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 19 / Monday, January 30, 2006 / Notices
cprice-sewell on PROD1PC66 with NOTICES
order to notify law enforcement
agencies of new vehicle lines exempted
from the parts marking requirements of
the Theft Prevention Standard.
Therefore, although VW has been
granted confidential treatment for most
aspects of its petition, the agency notes
certain information that may be
published in the Federal Register. If VW
decides not to use the exemption for
this line, it must formally notify the
agency, and, thereafter, the line must be
fully marked as required by 49 CFR
parts 541.5 and 541.6 (marking of major
component parts and replacement
parts).
NHTSA notes that if VW wishes in
the future to modify the device on
which this exemption is based, the
company may have to submit a petition
to modify the exemption. Part 543.7(d)
states that a Part 543 exemption applies
only to vehicles that belong to a line
exempted under this part and equipped
with the anti-theft device on which the
line’s exemption is based. Further,
§ 543.9(c)(2) provides for the submission
of petitions ‘‘to modify an exemption to
permit the use of an antitheft device
similar to but differing from the one
specified in that exemption.’’
The agency wishes to minimize the
administrative burden that Part
543.9(c)(2) could place on exempted
vehicle manufacturers and itself. The
agency did not intend Part 543 to
require the submission of a modification
petition for every change to the
components or design of an antitheft
device. The significance of many such
changes could be de minimis. Therefore,
NHTSA suggests that if the
manufacturer contemplates making any
changes the effects of which might be
characterized as de minimis, it should
consult the agency before preparing and
submitting a petition to modify.
We note that VW requested
confidential treatment for the
information and attachments it
VerDate Aug<31>2005
14:07 Jan 27, 2006
Jkt 208001
submitted in support of its petition.
While the agency granted the
petitioner’s request for confidential
treatment of most aspects of its petition,
we have released the model year for
which the exemption is granted. This
information is necessary for the law
enforcement efforts to combat motor
vehicle theft. That is, law enforcement
officials need to know whether a given
motor vehicle line was subject or
exempted from the parts-marking
requirements for a given model year.
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 33106; delegation of
authority at 49 CFR 1.50.
Issued on: January 23, 2006.
Stephen R. Kratzke,
Associate Administrator for Rulemaking.
[FR Doc. E6–1073 Filed 1–27–06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–59–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Surface Transportation Board
[STB Finance Docket No. 34820]
Union Pacific Railroad Company—
Temporary Trackage Rights
Exemption—BNSF Railway Company
BNSF Railway Company (BNSF)
pursuant to a written trackage rights
agreement entered into between BNSF
and Union Pacific Railroad Company
(UP) has agreed to grant temporary
overhead trackage rights to UP over
BNSF’s line of railroad between Hobart
Tower, CA (milepost 146.0), and
Riverside, CA (milepost 9.8), a distance
of approximately 57.7 miles.1
The transaction was scheduled to be
consummated on January 16, 2006, but
consummation could lawfully occur no
earlier than January 17, 2006, the
1 Total mileage does not correspond to the
milepost designations of the endpoints because the
trackage rights involve BNSF subdivisions with
non-contiguous mileposts.
PO 00000
Frm 00078
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
4967
effective date of the exemption (7 days
after the exemption was filed). The
temporary trackage rights will expire on
or about March 22, 2006. The purpose
of the temporary trackage rights is to
facilitate maintenance work on UP lines.
As a condition to this exemption, any
employee affected by the acquisition of
the temporary trackage rights will be
protected by the conditions imposed in
Norfolk and Western Ry. Co.—Trackage
Rights—BN, 354 I.C.C. 605 (1978), as
modified in Mendocino Coast Ry., Inc.—
Lease and Operate, 360 I.C.C. 653
(1980), and any employee affected by
the discontinuance of those trackage
rights will be protected by the
conditions set out in Oregon Short Line
R. Co.—Abandonment—Goshen, 360
I.C.C. 91 (1979).
This notice is filed under 49 CFR
1180.2(d)(8). If it contains false or
misleading information, the exemption
is void ab initio. Petitions to revoke the
exemption under 49 U.S.C. 10502(d)
may be filed at any time. The filing of
a petition to revoke will not
automatically stay the transaction.
An original and 10 copies of all
pleadings, referring to STB Finance
Docket No. 34820, must be filed with
the Surface Transportation Board, 1925
K Street, NW., Washington, DC 20423–
0001. In addition, a copy of each
pleading must be served on Gabriel S.
Meyer, Assistant General Attorney, 1400
Douglas Street, STOP 1580, Omaha, NE
68179.
Board decisions and notices are
available on our Web site at https://
www.stb.dot.gov.
Decided: January 23, 2006.
By the Board, David M. Konschnik,
Director, Office of Proceedings.
Vernon A. Williams,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 06–761 Filed 1–27–06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4915–01–P
E:\FR\FM\30JAN1.SGM
30JAN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 71, Number 19 (Monday, January 30, 2006)]
[Notices]
[Pages 4966-4967]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E6-1073]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
National Highway Traffic Safety Administration
Petition for Exemption From the Vehicle Theft Prevention
Standard; Volkswagen
AGENCY: National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA)
Department of Transportation (DOT).
ACTION: Grant of petition for exemption.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: This document grants in full the petition of Volkswagen of
America, Inc. (VW) in accordance with Sec. 543.9(c)(2) of 49 CFR Part
543, Exemption from the Theft Prevention Standard, for the Audi A4
vehicle line beginning with model year (MY) 2007. This petition is
granted because the agency has determined that the antitheft device to
be placed on the line as standard equipment is likely to be as
effective in reducing and deterring motor vehicle theft as compliance
with the parts-marking requirements of the Theft Prevention Standard.
In a letter dated October 19, 2005, the agency granted the petitioner's
request for confidential treatment of most aspects of its petition.
DATES: The exemption granted by this notice is effective beginning with
model year (MY) 2007.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms. Deborah Mazyck, Office of
International Policy, Fuel Economy and Consumer Programs, NHTSA, 400
Seventh Street, SW., Washington, DC 20590. Ms. Mazyck's telephone
number is (202) 366-0846. Her fax number is (202) 493-2290.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In a petition dated September 26, 2005, VW
requested exemption from the parts-marking requirements of the theft
prevention standard (49 CFR part 541) for the MY 2007 Audi A4 vehicle
line. The petition requested exemption from parts-marking pursuant to
49 CFR part 543, Exemption from Vehicle Theft Prevention Standard,
based on the installation of an antitheft device as standard equipment
for an entire vehicle line.
Under Sec. 543.5(a), a manufacturer may petition NHTSA to grant
exemptions for one line of its vehicle lines per year. In its petition,
VW provided a detailed description and diagram of the identity, design,
and location of the components of the antitheft device for the new
vehicle line. VW will install its passive, antitheft device as standard
equipment beginning with MY 2007. Features of the antitheft device will
include the immobilizer control unit, the reading coil on the ignition
lock, the engine control unit, a transponder-based ignition key, a
remote key fob and a visable and audible alarm. VW's submission is
considered a complete petition as required by 49 CFR 543.7, in that it
meets the general requirements contained in 543.5 and the specific
content requirements of 543.6.
VW's proposed device incorporates an immobilizer feature, tow away
protection and an audible and visual alarm system. VW stated that the
device is switched on by turning the key in either of the front door
locks to the lock position, or by locking the vehicle with the remote
key fob. The A4's immobilizer prevents the vehicle from being operated
by unauthorized persons. When the ignition key is turned to the ``on''
position, the key's transporter, the immobilizer control unit, and the
engine control unit initiate a complex set of tests to determine if
vehicle start-up should be enabled. If the tests fail, the vehicle
cannot be started. Additionally, the audible alarm and emergency
flashers are activated if any of the protected areas of the vehicle are
violated. The protected areas include the doors, trunk or hatch, hood,
activation of ignition lock voltage and tilt.
In addressing the specific content requirements of 543.6, VW
provided information on the reliability and durability of its proposed
device. To ensure reliability and durability of the device, VW
conducted tests based on its own specified standards. VW provided a
detailed list of the tests conducted, including those for electrical
and mechanical durability and believes that the device is reliable and
durable since it complied with VW's specified requirements for each
test.
VW also provided information on the theft rate history for previous
MY vehicles installed with a similar device as that proposed. VW
indicated that the theft rates for the Audi A4 vehicle line have been
significantly below the median. NHTSA's theft rates for the A4 vehicle
for model years 2000 through 2003 were 1.2433, 1.6561, 1.8970, and
0.8418, respectively.
On the basis of this comparison, VW has concluded that the proposed
antitheft device is no less effective than those devices installed on
lines for which NHTSA has already granted full exemption from the
parts-marking requirements.
Based on the evidence submitted by VW, the agency believes that the
antitheft device for the A4 vehicle line is likely to be as effective
in reducing and deterring motor vehicle theft as compliance with the
parts-marking requirements of the Theft Prevention Standard (49 CFR
Part 541).
The agency concludes that the device will provide the five types of
performance listed in Sec. 543.6(a)(3): promoting activation;
attracting attention to the efforts of unauthorized persons to enter or
operate a vehicle by means other than a key; preventing defeat or
circumvention of the device by unauthorized persons; preventing
operation of the vehicle by unauthorized entrants; and ensuring the
reliability and durability of the device.
As required by 49 U.S.C. 33106 and 49 CFR 543.6 (a)(4) and (5), the
agency finds that VW has provided adequate reasons for its belief that
the antitheft device will reduce and deter theft. This conclusion is
based on the information VW provided about its device, much of which is
confidential. For the foregoing reasons, the agency hereby grants in
full VW's petition for exemption for the A4 vehicle line from the
parts-marking requirements of 49 CFR part 541. The agency notes that 49
CFR part 541, Appendix A-1, identifies those lines that are exempted
from the Theft Prevention Standard for a given model year. 49 CFR part
543.7(f) contains publication requirements incident to the disposition
of all Part 543 petitions. Advanced listing, including the release of
future product nameplates, the beginning model year for which the
exemption is granted and a general description of the device is
necessary in
[[Page 4967]]
order to notify law enforcement agencies of new vehicle lines exempted
from the parts marking requirements of the Theft Prevention Standard.
Therefore, although VW has been granted confidential treatment for most
aspects of its petition, the agency notes certain information that may
be published in the Federal Register. If VW decides not to use the
exemption for this line, it must formally notify the agency, and,
thereafter, the line must be fully marked as required by 49 CFR parts
541.5 and 541.6 (marking of major component parts and replacement
parts).
NHTSA notes that if VW wishes in the future to modify the device on
which this exemption is based, the company may have to submit a
petition to modify the exemption. Part 543.7(d) states that a Part 543
exemption applies only to vehicles that belong to a line exempted under
this part and equipped with the anti-theft device on which the line's
exemption is based. Further, Sec. 543.9(c)(2) provides for the
submission of petitions ``to modify an exemption to permit the use of
an antitheft device similar to but differing from the one specified in
that exemption.''
The agency wishes to minimize the administrative burden that Part
543.9(c)(2) could place on exempted vehicle manufacturers and itself.
The agency did not intend Part 543 to require the submission of a
modification petition for every change to the components or design of
an antitheft device. The significance of many such changes could be de
minimis. Therefore, NHTSA suggests that if the manufacturer
contemplates making any changes the effects of which might be
characterized as de minimis, it should consult the agency before
preparing and submitting a petition to modify.
We note that VW requested confidential treatment for the
information and attachments it submitted in support of its petition.
While the agency granted the petitioner's request for confidential
treatment of most aspects of its petition, we have released the model
year for which the exemption is granted. This information is necessary
for the law enforcement efforts to combat motor vehicle theft. That is,
law enforcement officials need to know whether a given motor vehicle
line was subject or exempted from the parts-marking requirements for a
given model year.
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 33106; delegation of authority at 49 CFR
1.50.
Issued on: January 23, 2006.
Stephen R. Kratzke,
Associate Administrator for Rulemaking.
[FR Doc. E6-1073 Filed 1-27-06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-59-P