In the Matter of Certain Color Television Receivers and Color Display Monitors and Components Thereof; Notice of Commission Determination Not To Review an Initial Determination Terminating the Investigation on the Basis of Two Settlement Agreements, 4611 [E6-1037]

Download as PDF Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 18 / Friday, January 27, 2006 / Notices attend one of four public scoping meetings held throughout the State. Based on public scoping comments, the Services prepared a Draft Environmental Impact Statement (DEIS) to analyze the effects of alternatives on the human environment. The DEIS, draft HCP, and draft Implementation Agreement were made available to the public for a 90-day public comment period through a Notice of Availability in the Federal Register on February 11, 2005 (70 FR 7245). Comments received on the draft documents and responses to those comments are included in the EIS. Changes to the draft HCP and DEIS resulting from the comments received during the public comment period are reflected in the final HCP and EIS. Implementation of the State’s HCP, including issuance of associated ITPs from the Services for endangered, threatened and covered species (should they become listed) is Alternative 2 in the EIS. Three other alternatives are analyzed in the EIS including: Alternative 1, no action, in that neither ITPs nor section 4(d) limits on the application of the prohibition against take would be issued to the state; Alternative 3, amend and implement the conservation plan and issue section 4(d) limits on the application of the prohibition against take for those threatened species identified in the existing NMFS 4(d) rule, and through a new rule that would be developed by FWS for the threatened bull trout; and Alternative 4, ITPs would be issued based on more restrictive forest practices rules that would be incorporated into the State’s proposed conservation plan. This notice is provided pursuant to the ESA and NEPA regulations. The Services will evaluate the applications, associated documents, and comments submitted thereon to determine whether the applications meet the requirements of the ESA and NEPA. The Services’ decisions whether to issue ITPs or limits on the application of the prohibition against take will be made based on the EIS, the associated Record of Decision, and the Services’ ESA decision documents. rmajette on PROD1PC67 with NOTICES Dated: January 24, 2006. David J. Wesley, Deputy Regional Director, Fish and Wildlife Service, Region 1, Portland, Oregon. Dated: January 24, 2006. Susan Pultz, Acting Chief, Endangered Species Division, Office of Protected Resource, National Marine Fisheries Service. [FR Doc. E6–1058 Filed 1–26–06; 8:45 am] BILLING CODES 3510–22–S; 4310–55–S VerDate Aug<31>2005 15:17 Jan 26, 2006 Jkt 208001 INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION [Investigation No. 337–TA–534] In the Matter of Certain Color Television Receivers and Color Display Monitors and Components Thereof; Notice of Commission Determination Not To Review an Initial Determination Terminating the Investigation on the Basis of Two Settlement Agreements U.S. International Trade Commission. ACTION: Notice. AGENCY: SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that the U.S. International Trade Commission has determined not to review the presiding administrative law judge’s (‘‘ALJ’s’’) initial determination (‘‘ID’’) granting a joint motion to terminate the above-captioned investigation on the basis of two settlement agreements. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Steven Crabb, Esq., Office of the General Counsel, U.S. International Trade Commission, 500 E Street, SW., Washington, DC 20436, telephone (202) 708–5432. Copies of non-confidential documents filed in connection with this investigation are or will be available for inspection during official business hours (8:45 a.m. to 5:15 p.m.) in the Office of the Secretary, U.S. International Trade Commission, 500 E Street, SW., Washington, DC 20436, telephone (202) 205–2000. General information concerning the Commission may also be obtained by accessing its Internet server (https://www.usitc.gov). The public record for this investigation may be viewed on the Commission’s electronic docket (EDIS) at https:// edis.usitc.gov. Hearing-impaired persons are advised that information on this matter can be obtained by contacting the Commission’s TDD terminal on (202) 205–1810. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This investigation was instituted by the Commission based on a complaint filed by Thomson Licensing S.A. and Thomson Licensing Inc. See 70 FR 15883 (March 29, 2005). The complaint alleged violations of section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930 in the importation into the United States, the sale for importation, and the sale in the United States after importation of certain color television receivers and color display monitors and components thereof by reason of infringement of claims 1 and 3 of U.S. Patent No. 4,836,651, claim 1 of U.S. Patent No. 5,041,888, claims 1, 5, and 7 of U.S. Patent No. 5,153,754, claims 1, 3, 5, and 6 of U.S. Patent No. PO 00000 Frm 00055 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 4611 5,389,893, and claims 1 and 2 of U.S. Patent No. 5,452,195. The complaint named as respondents, BenQ Corp. of Taoyuan 33 of Taiwan; BenQ Optronics (Suzhou) Co., Ltd. of China; BenQ America Corp. of Irvine, California; and AU Optronics Corp. of Hsinchu, Taiwan. On December 9, 2005, the private parties filed a joint motion to terminate the investigation on the basis of two settlement agreements. On December 14, 2005, the Commission investigative attorney filed a response in support of the parties’ joint motion to terminate the investigation. On December 20, 2005, the ALJ issued an ID (Order No. 45) granting the joint motion to terminate the investigation on the basis of the settlement agreements. The ALJ found no indication that such termination of the investigation would adversely impact the public interest. No party filed a petition to review the subject ID. The Commission has determined not to review the ALJ’s ID. Accordingly, the above-referenced investigation is hereby terminated. The authority for the Commission’s determination is contained in section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (19 U.S.C. 1337), and in §§ 210.21(b), and 210.42 of the Commission’s Rules of Practice and Procedure (19 CFR 210.21, 210.42). By order of the Commission. Issued: January 23, 2006. Marilyn R. Abbott, Secretary to the Commission. [FR Doc. E6–1037 Filed 1–26–06; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 7020–02–P INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION [Investigation No. 337–TA–542] In the Matter of Certain DVD/CD Players and Recorders, Color Television Receivers and Monitors, and Components Thereof; Notice of Commission Determination Not To Review an Initial Determination Terminating the Investigation on the Basis of Two Settlement Agreements International Trade Commission. ACTION: Notice. AGENCY: SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that the U.S. International Trade Commission has determined not to review the presiding administrative law judge’s (‘‘ALJ’s’’) initial determination (‘‘ID’’) granting a joint motion to terminate the above-captioned E:\FR\FM\27JAN1.SGM 27JAN1

Agencies

[Federal Register Volume 71, Number 18 (Friday, January 27, 2006)]
[Notices]
[Page 4611]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E6-1037]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION

[Investigation No. 337-TA-534]


In the Matter of Certain Color Television Receivers and Color 
Display Monitors and Components Thereof; Notice of Commission 
Determination Not To Review an Initial Determination Terminating the 
Investigation on the Basis of Two Settlement Agreements

AGENCY: U.S. International Trade Commission.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that the U.S. International Trade 
Commission has determined not to review the presiding administrative 
law judge's (``ALJ's'') initial determination (``ID'') granting a joint 
motion to terminate the above-captioned investigation on the basis of 
two settlement agreements.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Steven Crabb, Esq., Office of the 
General Counsel, U.S. International Trade Commission, 500 E Street, 
SW., Washington, DC 20436, telephone (202) 708-5432. Copies of non-
confidential documents filed in connection with this investigation are 
or will be available for inspection during official business hours 
(8:45 a.m. to 5:15 p.m.) in the Office of the Secretary, U.S. 
International Trade Commission, 500 E Street, SW., Washington, DC 
20436, telephone (202) 205-2000. General information concerning the 
Commission may also be obtained by accessing its Internet server 
(https://www.usitc.gov). The public record for this investigation may be 
viewed on the Commission's electronic docket (EDIS) at https://
edis.usitc.gov. Hearing-impaired persons are advised that information 
on this matter can be obtained by contacting the Commission's TDD 
terminal on (202) 205-1810.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This investigation was instituted by the 
Commission based on a complaint filed by Thomson Licensing S.A. and 
Thomson Licensing Inc. See 70 FR 15883 (March 29, 2005). The complaint 
alleged violations of section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930 in the 
importation into the United States, the sale for importation, and the 
sale in the United States after importation of certain color television 
receivers and color display monitors and components thereof by reason 
of infringement of claims 1 and 3 of U.S. Patent No. 4,836,651, claim 1 
of U.S. Patent No. 5,041,888, claims 1, 5, and 7 of U.S. Patent No. 
5,153,754, claims 1, 3, 5, and 6 of U.S. Patent No. 5,389,893, and 
claims 1 and 2 of U.S. Patent No. 5,452,195. The complaint named as 
respondents, BenQ Corp. of Taoyuan 33 of Taiwan; BenQ Optronics 
(Suzhou) Co., Ltd. of China; BenQ America Corp. of Irvine, California; 
and AU Optronics Corp. of Hsinchu, Taiwan.
    On December 9, 2005, the private parties filed a joint motion to 
terminate the investigation on the basis of two settlement agreements. 
On December 14, 2005, the Commission investigative attorney filed a 
response in support of the parties' joint motion to terminate the 
investigation.
    On December 20, 2005, the ALJ issued an ID (Order No. 45) granting 
the joint motion to terminate the investigation on the basis of the 
settlement agreements. The ALJ found no indication that such 
termination of the investigation would adversely impact the public 
interest. No party filed a petition to review the subject ID.
    The Commission has determined not to review the ALJ's ID. 
Accordingly, the above-referenced investigation is hereby terminated.
    The authority for the Commission's determination is contained in 
section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (19 U.S.C. 1337), and 
in Sec. Sec.  210.21(b), and 210.42 of the Commission's Rules of 
Practice and Procedure (19 CFR 210.21, 210.42).

    By order of the Commission.

    Issued: January 23, 2006.
Marilyn R. Abbott,
Secretary to the Commission.
[FR Doc. E6-1037 Filed 1-26-06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7020-02-P
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.