Proposed Collection; Comment Request, 4384-4385 [E6-970]
Download as PDF
4384
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 17 / Thursday, January 26, 2006 / Notices
a94_appx-c.html, the text of the main body
of the Circular is found at https://
www.whitehouse.gov/omb/circulars/a094/
a094.html, and a table of past years’ rates is
located at https://www.whitehouse.gov/omb/
circulars/a094/dischist-2006.pdf. Updates of
the appendix are also available upon request
from OMB’s Office of Economic Policy (202–
395–3381).
Nominal Discount Rates. A forecast of
nominal or market interest rates for 2006
based on the economic assumptions from the
2007 Budget are presented below. These
nominal rates are to be used for discounting
nominal flows, which are often encountered
in lease-purchase analysis.
NOMINAL INTEREST RATES ON TREASURY NOTES AND BONDS OF SPECIFIED MATURITIES
[In percent]
3-year
5-year
7-year
10-year
20-year
30-year
4.7
4.8
4.9
5.0
5.3
5.2
Real Discount Rates. A forecast of real
interest rates from which the inflation
premium has been removed and based on the
economic assumptions from the 2007 Budget
is presented below. These real rates are to be
used for discounting real (constant-dollar)
flows, as often required in cost-effectiveness
analysis.
REAL INTEREST RATES ON TREASURY NOTES AND BONDS OF SPECIFIED MATURITIES
[In percent]
3-year
5-year
7-year
10-year
20-year
30-year
2.5
2.6
2.7
2.8
3.0
3.0
Analyses of programs with terms different
from those presented above may use a linear
interpolation. For example, a four-year
project can be evaluated with a rate equal to
the average of the three-year and five-year
rates. Programs with durations longer than 30
years may use the 30-year interest rate.
[FR Doc. E6–963 Filed 1–25–06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3110–01–P
RAILROAD RETIREMENT BOARD
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with NOTICES
Proposed Collection; Comment
Request
SUMMARY: In accordance with the
requirement of Section 3506(c)(2)(A) of
the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995
which provides opportunity for public
comment on new or revised data
collections, the Railroad Retirement
Board (RRB) will publish periodic
summaries of proposed data collections.
Comments are invited on: (a) Whether
the proposed information collection is
necessary for the proper performance of
the functions of the agency, including
whether the information has practical
utility; (b) the accuracy of the RRB’s
estimate of the burden of the collection
of the information; (c) ways to enhance
the quality, utility, and clarity of the
information to be collected; and (d)
ways to minimize the burden related to
the collection of information on
respondents, including the use of
automated collection techniques or
other forms of information technology.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:10 Jan 25, 2006
Jkt 205001
Title and Purpose of Information
Collection
Nonresident Questionnaire; OMB 3220–
0145.
Under Public Laws 98–21 and 98–76,
benefits under the Railroad Retirement
Act payable to annuitants living outside
the United States may be subject to
taxation under United States income tax
laws. Whether the social security
equivalent and non-social security
equivalent portions of Tier I, Tier II,
vested dual benefit, or supplemental
annuity payments are subject to tax
withholding, and whether the same or
different rates are applied to each
payment, depends on a beneficiary’s
citizenship and legal residence status,
and whether exemption under a tax
treaty between the United States and the
country in which the beneficiary is a
legal resident has been claimed. To
effect the required tax withholding, the
Railroad Retirement Board (RRB) needs
to know a nonresidents citizenship and
legal residence status.
To secure the required information,
the RRB utilizes Form RRB–1001,
Nonresident Questionnaire, as a
supplement to an application as part of
the initial application process, and as an
independent vehicle for obtaining the
needed information when an
annuitant’s residence or tax treaty status
changes. Completion is voluntary. One
response is requested of each
respondent.
The RRB estimates that 1,300 Form
RRB–1001’s are completed annually.
The completion time for Form RRB–
1001 is estimated at 30 minutes. No
PO 00000
Frm 00039
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
changes are proposed to Form RRB–
1001.
Additional Information or Comments:
To request more information or to
obtain a copy of the information
collection justifications, forms, and/or
supporting material, please call the RRB
Clearance Officer at (312) 751–3363 or
send an e-mail request to
Charles.Mierzwa@RRB.GOV. Comments
regarding the information collection
should be addressed to Ronald J.
Hodapp, Railroad Retirement Board, 844
N. Rush Street, Chicago, Illinois 60611–
2092 or send an e-mail to
Ronald.Hodapp@RRB.GOV. Comments
should be received within 60 days of
this notice.
Charles Mierzwa,
Clearance Officer.
[FR Doc. E6–946 Filed 1–25–06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7905–01–P
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
COMMISSION
Proposed Collection; Comment
Request
Upon Written Request, Copies Available
From: Securities and Exchange
Commission, Office of Filings and
Information Services, Washington, DC
20549.
Extension:
Rule 15c2–7; SEC File No. 270–420; OMB
Control No. 3235–0479.
Notice is hereby given that pursuant
to the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995
(44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.), the Securities
and Exchange Commission
E:\FR\FM\26JAN1.SGM
26JAN1
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 17 / Thursday, January 26, 2006 / Notices
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with NOTICES
(Commission) is soliciting comments on
the collection of information
summarized below. The Commission
plans to submit this existing collection
of information to the Office of
Management and Budget for extension
and approval.
• Rule 15c2–7 Identification of
Quotations.
Rule 15c2–7 enumerates the
requirements with which all brokers
and dealers must comply when
submitting a quotation for a security
(other than a municipal security) to an
inter-dealer quotation system.
It is estimated that there are 8,500
brokers and dealers. Industry personnel
estimate that approximately 900 notices
are filed pursuant to Rule 15c2–7
annually. Based on industry estimates
that respondents complying with Rule
15c2–7 spend 30 seconds to add notice
of an arrangement and 1 minute to
delete notice of an arrangement, the staff
estimates that, on an annual basis,
respondents spend a total of 11.25 hours
to comply with Rule 15c2–7, based
upon past submissions. The average cost
per hour is approximately $35.
Therefore, the total cost of compliance
for brokers and dealers is approximately
$393.75.
Written comments are invited on: (a)
Whether the proposed collection of
information is necessary for the proper
performance of the functions of the
agency, including whether the
information shall have practical utility;
(b) the accuracy of the agency’s
estimates of the burden of the proposed
collection of information; (c) ways to
enhance the quality, utility, and clarity
of the information to be collected; and
(d) ways to minimize the burden of the
collection of information on
respondents, including through the use
of automated collection techniques or
other forms of information technology.
Consideration will be given to
comments and suggestions submitted in
writing within 60 days of this
publication.
Please direct your written comments
to R. Corey Booth, Director/Chief
Information Officer, Office of
Information Technology, Securities and
Exchange Commission, 100 F Street,
NE., Washington, DC 20549.
Dated: January 18, 2006.
Nancy M. Morris,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. E6–970 Filed 1–25–06; 8:45 am]
16:10 Jan 25, 2006
Issuer Delisting; Notice of Application
of CITGO Petroleum Corporation To
Withdraw its 77⁄8% Senior Notes (Due
May 15, 2006), From Listing and
Registration on the New York Stock
Exchange, Inc. File No. 1–14380
January 20, 2006.
On January 12, 2006, CITGO
Petroleum Corporation, a Delaware
corporation (‘‘Issuer’’), filed an
application with the Securities and
Exchange Commission (‘‘Commission’’),
pursuant to section 12(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(‘‘Act’’) 1 and Rule 12d2–2(d)
thereunder,2 to withdraw its 77⁄8%
senior notes (due May 15, 2006)
(‘‘Security’’), from listing and
registration on the New York Stock
Exchange, Inc. (‘‘NYSE’’).
On August 30, 2004, the Board of
Directors (‘‘Board’’) of the Issuer
adopted resolutions to withdraw the
Security from listing and registration on
NYSE. The Issuer stated that the Board
determined that it is in the best interest
of the Issuer and the holders of the
Security to delist the Security from
NYSE and to withdraw from registration
under section 12(b) of the Act.3 The
Issuer stated the reasons that factored
into the Board’s decision to withdraw
the Security from listing on NYSE
included a determination that the
benefits of continued listing were
outweighed by the administrative
burdens, particularly since the adoption
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 has
resulted in more stringent corporate
governance rules and increased costs of
compliance. The Issuer also stated that
in November 2005, the Issuer completed
a tender offer for the Security pursuant
to Board approval. As a result of such
tender offer, only approximately
$14,300,000 of the original $200,000,000
face amount of the Security remains
outstanding.
The Issuer stated in its application
that it has complied with the NYSE’s
rules governing an issuer’s voluntary
withdrawal of a security from listing
and registration by complying with all
applicable laws in the State of Delaware,
in which the Issuer is incorporated, and
by providing NYSE with the required
documents governing the removal of
securities from listing and registration
on NYSE.
The Issuer’s application relates solely
to the withdrawal of the Security from
Jkt 205001
U.S.C. 78l(d).
CFR 240.12d2–2(d).
3 15 U.S.C. 78l(b).
listing on NYSE and from registration
under section 12(b) of the Act,4 and
shall not affect its obligation to be
registered under section 12(g) of the
Act.5
Any interested person may, on or
before February 10, 2006, comment on
the facts bearing upon whether the
application has been made in
accordance with the rules of NYSE, and
what terms, if any, should be imposed
by the Commission for the protection of
investors. All comment letters may be
submitted by either of the following
methods:
Electronic Comments
• Use the Commission’s Internet
comment form (https://www.sec.gov/
rules/delist.shtml); or
• Send an e-mail to rulecomments@sec.gov. Please include the
File Number 1–14380 or;
Paper Comments
• Send paper comments in triplicate
to Nancy M. Morris, Secretary,
Securities and Exchange Commission,
100 F Street, NE., Washington, DC
20549–9303.
All submissions should refer to File
Number 1–14380. This file number
should be included on the subject line
if e-mail is used. To help us process and
review your comments more efficiently,
please use only one method. The
Commission will post all comments on
the Commission’s Internet Web site
(https://www.sec.gov/rules/delist.shtml).
Comments are also available for public
inspection and copying in the
Commission’s Public Reference Room.
All comments received will be posted
without change; we do not edit personal
identifying information from
submissions. You should submit only
information that you wish to make
available publicly.
The Commission, based on the
information submitted to it, will issue
an order granting the application after
the date mentioned above, unless the
Commission determines to order a
hearing on the matter.
For the Commission, by the Division of
Market Regulation, pursuant to delegated
authority.6
Nancy M. Morris,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. E6–971 Filed 1–25–06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8010–01–P
1 15
4 15
2 17
BILLING CODE 8010–01–P
VerDate Aug<31>2005
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
COMMISSION
5 15
PO 00000
Frm 00040
Fmt 4703
U.S.C. 78l(b).
U.S.C. 78l(g).
6 17 CFR 200.30–3(a)(1).
Sfmt 4703
4385
E:\FR\FM\26JAN1.SGM
26JAN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 71, Number 17 (Thursday, January 26, 2006)]
[Notices]
[Pages 4384-4385]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E6-970]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Proposed Collection; Comment Request
Upon Written Request, Copies Available From: Securities and Exchange
Commission, Office of Filings and Information Services, Washington, DC
20549.
Extension:
Rule 15c2-7; SEC File No. 270-420; OMB Control No. 3235-0479.
Notice is hereby given that pursuant to the Paperwork Reduction Act
of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.), the Securities and Exchange
Commission
[[Page 4385]]
(Commission) is soliciting comments on the collection of information
summarized below. The Commission plans to submit this existing
collection of information to the Office of Management and Budget for
extension and approval.
Rule 15c2-7 Identification of Quotations.
Rule 15c2-7 enumerates the requirements with which all brokers and
dealers must comply when submitting a quotation for a security (other
than a municipal security) to an inter-dealer quotation system.
It is estimated that there are 8,500 brokers and dealers. Industry
personnel estimate that approximately 900 notices are filed pursuant to
Rule 15c2-7 annually. Based on industry estimates that respondents
complying with Rule 15c2-7 spend 30 seconds to add notice of an
arrangement and 1 minute to delete notice of an arrangement, the staff
estimates that, on an annual basis, respondents spend a total of 11.25
hours to comply with Rule 15c2-7, based upon past submissions. The
average cost per hour is approximately $35. Therefore, the total cost
of compliance for brokers and dealers is approximately $393.75.
Written comments are invited on: (a) Whether the proposed
collection of information is necessary for the proper performance of
the functions of the agency, including whether the information shall
have practical utility; (b) the accuracy of the agency's estimates of
the burden of the proposed collection of information; (c) ways to
enhance the quality, utility, and clarity of the information to be
collected; and (d) ways to minimize the burden of the collection of
information on respondents, including through the use of automated
collection techniques or other forms of information technology.
Consideration will be given to comments and suggestions submitted in
writing within 60 days of this publication.
Please direct your written comments to R. Corey Booth, Director/
Chief Information Officer, Office of Information Technology, Securities
and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street, NE., Washington, DC 20549.
Dated: January 18, 2006.
Nancy M. Morris,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. E6-970 Filed 1-25-06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8010-01-P