Notice of Determinations Regarding Eligibility To Apply for Worker Adjustment Assistance, 3886-3888 [E6-803]
Download as PDF
<![CDATA[
3886
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 15 / Tuesday, January 24, 2006 / Notices
information collected will be used by
the COPS Office to determine grantee’s
progress toward grant implementation
and for compliance monitoring efforts.
(5) An estimate of the total number of
respondents and the amount of time
estimated for an average respondent to
respond: There will be an estimated 100
responses from methamphetamine
grantees. The estimated amount of time
required for the average respondent to
respond is 3 hours and 15 minutes.
(6) An estimate of the total public
burden (in hours) associated with the
collection: The estimated total burden
associated with the collection is 325
hours.
If additional information is required
contact: Brenda Dyer, Department
Clearance Officer, United States
Department of Justice, Justice
Management Division, Patrick Henry
Building, Suite 1600, 601 D Street, NW.,
Washington, DC 20530.
Dated: January 18, 2006.
Brenda Dyer,
Department Clearance Officer, United States
Department of Justice.
[FR Doc. E6–787 Filed 1–23–06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410–AT–P
DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
rmajette on PROD1PC67 with NOTICES1
Notice of Lodging of Consent Decree
Under Comprehensive Environmental
Response, Compensation and Liability
Act
In accordance with Departmental
policy, 28 CFR 50.7, notice is hereby
given that on January 10, 2006, a
proposed Consent Decree in United
States v. Beehive Barrel and Drum, Inc.
d/b/a Cascade Cooperage, Inc. (D.
Utah), C.A. No. 2:04–CV–00570 (TC),
was lodged with the United States
District Court for the District of Utah,
Central Division.
In this action, the United States seeks
response costs incurred and to be
incurred by the Environmental
Protection Agency (‘‘EPA’’), pursuant to
Section 107 of the Comprehensive
Environmental Response, Compensation
and Liability Act, as amended
(‘‘CERCLA’’), 42 U.S.C. 9607, in
connection with the Service First Barrel
and Drum Site, located in Salt Lake
City, Utah. Three defendants, Adria
Rossomondo, Arthur Rossomondo, and
Beehive Barrel and Drum, Inc. d/b/a
Cascade Cooperage, Inc. (‘‘Rossomondo
Defendants’’), have resolved the United
States’ response cost claims through this
Consent Decree. The settlement
incorporated in the Consent Decree does
not resolve the United States’ response
cost claims or any other claim with
VerDate Aug<31>2005
14:44 Jan 23, 2006
Jkt 208001
respect to the five other defendants
named in the complaint.
The Consent Decree provides, inter
alia, that the Rossomondo Defendants
and EPA will enter into a settlement
pursuant to EPA’s ability-to-pay policies
and procedures. As part of settlement
negotiations, EPA requested that the
Rossomondo Defendants provide
information regarding each defendant’s
financial status, and the Rossomondo
Defendants cooperatively provided all
of the requested information, which was
necessary under EPA’s policies and
procedures to perform an ability-to-pay
settlement analysis. Based upon the
analysis, EPA determined that the
Rossomondo Defendants had the
financial ability to pay a nominal
amount, or $325.00, of EPA’s response
costs that were incurred in connection
with the clean-up of the Site.
The Department of Justice will
receive, for a period of 30 days from the
date of this publication, comments
relating to the proposed Consent Decree.
Comments should be addressed to the
Assistant Attorney General for the
Environment and Natural Resources
Division, P.O. Box 7611, U.S.
Department of Justice, Washington, DC
20044–7611, and should refer to United
States v. Beehive Barrel and Drum, Inc.
d/b/a Cascade Cooperage, Inc., DOJ Ref.
No. 90–11–3–08170.
The proposed Consent Decree may be
examined at the Office of the United
States Attorney, 185 South State, Ste.
400, Salt Lake City, Utah 84111; and
U.S. EPA Region 8, 999 18th Street,
Denver, Colorado 80202. During the
public comment period, the proposed
Consent Decree may also be examined
on the following Department of Justice
Web site, https://www.usdoj.gov/enrd/
open.html. A copy of the proposed
Consent Decree may be obtained by mail
from the Consent Decree Library, P.O.
Box 7611, U.S. Department of Justice,
Washington, DC 20044–7611 or by
faxing or e-mailing a request to Tonia
Fleetwood (tonia.fleetwood@usdoj.gov),
fax number (202) 514–0097, phone
confirmation number (202) 514–1547. In
requesting a copy of the Consent Decree
from the Consent Decree Library, please
enclose a check in the amount of $6.00
(.25 cents per page reproduction costs),
payable to the U.S. Treasury.
Robert D. Brook,
Assistant Section Chief, Environmental
Enforcement Section, Environment and
Natural Resources Division.
[FR Doc. 06–603 Filed 1–23–06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410–15–M
PO 00000
Frm 00072
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
Employment and Training
Administration
Notice of Determinations Regarding
Eligibility To Apply for Worker
Adjustment Assistance
In accordance with Section 223 of the
Trade Act of 1974, as amended, (19
U.S.C. 2273), the Department of Labor
herein presents summaries of
determinations regarding eligibility to
apply for trade adjustment assistance for
workers (TA–W) number and alternative
trade adjustment assistance (ATAA) by
(TA–W) number issued during the
periods of January 2006.
In order for an affirmative
determination to be made and a
certification of eligibility to apply for
directly-impacted (primary) worker
adjustment assistance to be issued, each
of the group eligibility requirements of
Section 222(a) of the Act must be met.
I. Section (a)(2)(A) all of the following
must be satisfied:
A. A significant number or proportion
of the workers in such workers’ firm, or
an appropriate subdivision of the firm,
have become totally or partially
separated, or are threatened to become
totally or partially separated;
B. The sales or production, or both, of
such firm or subdivision have decreased
absolutely; and
C. Increased imports of articles like or
directly competitive with articles
produced by such firm or subdivision
have contributed importantly to such
workers’ separation or threat of
separation and to the decline in sales or
production of such firm or subdivision;
or
II. Section (a)(2)(B) both of the
following must be satisfied:
A. A significant number or proportion
of the workers in such workers’ firm, or
an appropriate subdivision of the firm,
have become totally or partially
separated, or are threatened to become
totally or partially separated;
B. There has been a shift in
production by such workers’ firm or
subdivision to a foreign country of
articles like or directly competitive with
articles which are produced by such
firm or subdivision; and
C. One of the following must be
satisfied:
1. The country to which the workers’
firm has shifted production of the
articles is a party to a free trade
agreement with the United States;
2. The country to which the workers’
firm has shifted production of the
articles to a beneficiary country under
the Andean Trade Preference Act,
E:\FR\FM\24JAN1.SGM
24JAN1
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 15 / Tuesday, January 24, 2006 / Notices
Affirmative Determinations for Worker
Adjustment Assistance
TA–W–58,326; Reliable Garment, Los
Angeles, CA, November 10, 2004.
TA–W–58,401; Accutech Mold and
Engineering, Little Falls, MN,
November 22, 2004.
TA–W–58,456; WestPoint Home, Inc.,
Bath Products Div., Ambassador
Personnel, Valley, AL, December 2,
2004.
TA–W–57,987; Sun Chemical,
Performance Pigments Division,
Cincinnati, OH, September 12,
2004.
TA–W–58,388; Chuan Hing Sewing, Inc.,
San Francisco, CA, November 21,
2004.
The following certifications have been
issued. The requirements of (a)(2)(B)
(shift in production) of Section 222 have
been met.
TA–W–58,396; Leesburg Knit Mill,
Knitting Div., Union Underwear Co.,
Inc., Leesburg, AL, November 21,
2004.
TA–W–58,480; LeSportsac, Inc., Stearns,
KY, November 30, 2004.
TA–W–58,499; Metaldyne Corporation,
LLC, Heartland Industrial Partners,
Edon, OH, December 6, 2005.
TA–W–58,502; Wella Manufacturing of
Virginia, USA Staffing, Spherion,
STAT, Aerotek, Will Rogers,
Richmond, VA, November 28, 2004.
TA–W–58,295; Pixelworks, Inc.,
Tualatin, OR, November 4, 2004.
TA–W–58,295A; Pixelworks, Inc.,
Campbell, CA, November 4, 2004.
The following certification has been
issued. The requirement of supplier to
a trade certified firm has been met.
None.
The following certification has been
issued. The requirement of downstream
producer to a trade certified firm has
been met.
None.
The following certifications have been
issued; the date following the company
name and location of each
determination references the impact
date for all workers of such
determination.
The following certifications have been
issued. The requirements of (a) (2) (A)
(increased imports) of Section 222 have
been met.
TA–W–58,327; Hewlett Packard,
Ontario, CA, November 10, 2004.
TA–W–58,412; F. Schumacher and
Company, Newark Customer
Service Facility, Newark, DE,
November 28, 2004.
TA–W–58,526; IPF Management
Company, Inc., d/b/a Invincible IPF,
Paterson, NJ, December 20, 2004.
TA–W–58,070; Carrier Access
Corporation, Boulder, CO, October
4, 2004.
Negative Determinations for Worker
Adjustment Assistance
In the following cases, the
investigation revealed that the criteria
for eligibility have not been met for the
reasons specified.
The investigation revealed that
criterion (a)(2)(A)(I.A) and (a)(2)(B)(II.A)
(no employment decline) has not been
met.
TA–W–58,413; Badger Paper Mills,
BPM, Inc., Flexible Packaging Div.,
Oconton Falls, WI.
The investigation revealed that
criteria (a)(2)(A)(I.B.) (Sales or
production, or both, did not decline)
and (a)(2)(B)(II.B) (No shift in
production to a foreign country) have
not been met.
None.
The investigation revealed that
criteria (a)(2)(A)(I.C.) (increased
rmajette on PROD1PC67 with NOTICES1
African Growth and Opportunity Act, or
the Caribbean Basin Economic Recovery
Act; or
3. There has been or is likely to be an
increase in imports of articles that are
like or directly competitive with articles
which are or were produced by such
firm or subdivision.
Also, in order for an affirmative
determination to be made and a
certification of eligibility to apply for
worker adjustment assistance as an
adversely affected secondary group to be
issued, each of the group eligibility
requirements of Section 222(b) of the
Act must be met.
(1) Significant number or proportion
of the workers in the workers’ firm or
an appropriate subdivision of the firm
have become totally or partially
separated, or are threatened to become
totally or partially separated;
(2) The workers’ firm (or subdivision)
is a supplier or downstream producer to
a firm (or subdivision) that employed a
group of workers who received a
certification of eligibility to apply for
trade adjustment assistance benefits and
such supply or production is related to
the article that was the basis for such
certification; and
(3) Either—
(A) The workers’ firm is a supplier
and the component parts it supplied for
the firm (or subdivision) described in
paragraph (2) accounted for at least 20
percent of the production or sales of the
workers’ firm; or
(B) A loss or business by the workers’
firm with the firm (or subdivision)
described in paragraph (2) contributed
importantly to the workers’ separation
or threat of separation.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
14:44 Jan 23, 2006
Jkt 208001
PO 00000
Frm 00073
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
3887
imports) and (a)(2)(B)(II.B) (No shift in
production to a foreign country) have
not been met.
TA–W–58,421; Sony Electronics, Direct
View CRT, Mt. Pleasant, PA.
TA–W–58,481; Collins and Aikman,
Southwest Laminates, Inc. Division,
El Paso, TX.
TA–W–58,274; Saint-Gobain Container,
Carteret, NJ.
The investigation revealed that
criteria (a)(2)(A)(I.C.) (Increased imports
and (a)(2)(B)(II.C) (has shifted
production to a foreign country) have
not been met.
None.
The workers firm does not produce an
article as required for certification under
Section 222 of the Trade Act of 1974.
TA–W–58,487; U.S. Airways, Greentree
Reservations, Pittsburgh, PA.
The investigation revealed that
criteria (2) has not been met. The
workers firm (or subdivision) is not a
supplier or downstream producer to
trade-affected companies.
None.
Affirmative Determinations for
Alternative Trade Adjustment
Assistance
In order for the Division of Trade
Adjustment Assistance to issue a
certification of eligibility to apply for
Alternative Trade Adjustment
Assistance (ATAA) for older workers,
the group eligibility requirements of
Section 246(a)(3)(A)(ii) of the Trade Act
must be met.
The following certifications have been
issued; the date following the company
name and location of each
determination references the impact
date for all workers of such
determinations.
In the following cases, it has been
determined that the requirements of
Section 246(a)(3)(ii) have been met.
I. Whether a significant number of
workers in the workers’ firm are 50
years of age or older.
II. Whether the workers in the
workers’ firm possess skills that are not
easily transferable.
III. The competitive conditions within
the workers’ industry (i.e., conditions
within the industry are adverse).
TA–W–58,396; Leesburg Knit Mill,
Knitting Div., Union Underwear Co.,
Inc., Leesburg, AL, November 21,
2004.
TA–W–58,480; LeSportsac, Inc., Stearns,
KY, November 30, 2004.
TA–W–58,499; Metaldyne Corporation,
LLC, Heartland Industrial Partners,
Edon, OH, December 6, 2005.
TA–W–58,502; Wella Manufacturing of
Virginia, USA Staffing, Spherion,
E:\FR\FM\24JAN1.SGM
24JAN1
3888
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 15 / Tuesday, January 24, 2006 / Notices
STAT, Aerotek, Will Rogers,
Richmond, VA, November 28, 2004.
TA–W–58,388; Chuan Hing Sewing, Inc.,
San Francisco, CA, November 21,
2004.
TA–W–58,456; WestPoint Home, Inc.,
Bath Products Div., Ambassador
Personnel, Valley, AL, December 2,
2004.
TA–W–58,327; Hewlett Packard,
Ontario, CA, November 10, 2004.
TA–W–58,526; IPF Management
Company, Inc., d/b/a Invincible IPF,
Paterson, NJ, December 20, 2004.
issued during the month of January
2006. Copies of these determinations are
available for inspection in Room C–
5311, U.S. Department of Labor, 200
Constitution Avenue, NW., Washington,
DC 20210, during normal business
hours or will be mailed to persons who
write to the above address.
Dated: January 12, 2006.
Erica R. Cantor,
Director, Division of Trade Adjustment
Assistance.
[FR Doc. E6–803 Filed 1–23–06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510–30–P
rmajette on PROD1PC67 with NOTICES1
Negative Determinations for Alternative
Trade Adjustment Assistance
In order for the Division of Trade
Adjustment Assistance to issue a
certification of eligibility to apply for
Alternative Trade Adjustment
Assistance (ATAA) for older workers,
the group eligibility requirements of
Section 246(a)(3)(A)(ii) of the Trade Act
must be met.
In the following cases, it has been
determined that the requirements of
Section 246(a)(3)(ii) have not been met
for the reasons specified.
Since the workers are denied
eligibility to apply for TAA, the workers
cannot be certified eligible for ATAA.
TA–W–58,487; U.S. Airways, Greentree
Reservations, Pittsburgh, PA.
TA–W–58,274; Saint-Gobain Container,
Carteret, NJ.
TA–W–58,421; Sony Electronics, Direct
View CRT, Mt. Pleasant, PA.
TA–W–58,481; Collins and Aikman,
Southwest Laminates, Inc. Division,
El Paso, TX.
The Department as determined that
criterion (1) of Section 246 has not been
met. Workers at the firm are 50 years of
age or older.
None.
The Department as determined that
criterion (2) of Section 246 has not been
met. Workers at the firm possess skills
that are easily transferable.
TA–W–58,295; Pixelworks, Inc.,
Tualatin, OR.
TA–W–58,295A; Pixelworks, Inc.,
Campbell, CA.
TA–W–58,070; Carrier Access
Corporation, Boulder, CO.
TA–W–58,401; Accutech Mold and
Engineering, Little Falls, MN.
TA–W–57,987; Sun Chemical,
Performance Pigments Division,
Cincinnati, OH.
The Department as determined that
criterion (3) of Section 246 has not been
met. Competition conditions within the
workers’ industry are not adverse.
None.
I hereby certify that the
aforementioned determinations were
VerDate Aug<31>2005
14:44 Jan 23, 2006
Jkt 208001
DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
Employment and Training
Administration
[TA–W–58,309]
OBG Manufacturing Company; Liberty,
KY; Dismissal of Application for
Reconsideration
Pursuant to 29 CFR 90.18(C) an
application for administrative
reconsideration was filed with the
Director of the Division of Trade
Adjustment Assistance for workers at
OBG Manufacturing Company, Liberty,
Kentucky. The application did not
contain new information supporting a
conclusion that the determination was
erroneous, and also did not provide a
justification for reconsideration of the
determination that was based on either
mistaken facts or a misinterpretation of
facts or of the law. Therefore, dismissal
of the application was issued.
TA–W–58,309; OBG Manufacturing
Company, Liberty, Kentucky
(January 11, 2006).
Signed at Washington, DC this 11th day of
January 2006.
Erica R. Cantor,
Director, Division of Trade Adjustment
Assistance.
[FR Doc. E6–802 Filed 1–23–06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510–30–P
DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
Employment and Training
Administration
[TA–W–58,047]
Plasti-Coil, Inc.; Lake Geneva, WI;
Notice of Negative Determination
Regarding Application for
Reconsideration
By application of December 8, 2005 a
petitioner requested administrative
reconsideration of the Department’s
negative determination regarding
PO 00000
Frm 00074
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
eligibility for workers and former
workers of the subject firm to apply for
Trade Adjustment Assistance (TAA) and
Alternative Trade Adjustment
Assistance (ATAA). The denial notice
was signed on November 10, 2005 and
published in the Federal Register on
December 6, 2005 (70 FR 72653).
Pursuant to 29 CFR 90.18(c)
reconsideration may be granted under
the following circumstances:
(1) If it appears on the basis of facts
not previously considered that the
determination complained of was
erroneous;
(2) If it appears that the determination
complained of was based on a mistake
in the determination of facts not
previously considered; or
(3) If in the opinion of the Certifying
Officer, a misinterpretation of facts or of
the law justified reconsideration of the
decision.
The TAA petition, filed on behalf of
workers at Plasti-Coil, Inc., Lake
Geneva, Wisconsin engaged in
production of custom injection molding
was denied because the ‘‘contributed
importantly’’ group eligibility
requirement of Section 222 of the Trade
Act of 1974 was not met, nor was there
a shift in production from that firm to
a foreign country. The ‘‘contributed
importantly’’ test is generally
demonstrated through a survey of the
workers’ firm’s declining customers.
The survey revealed no increase in
imports of custom injection molding.
The subject firm did not import custom
injection molding in the relevant period,
nor did it shift production to a foreign
country.
In the request for reconsideration, the
petitioner alleges that the layoffs at the
subject firm are attributable to a shift in
production to China. To support the
allegations, the petitioner attached a
copy of the letter from the subject firm’s
company official stating that ‘‘a
significant portion of the business has
been transferred to China’’.
A company official was contacted
regarding the above allegations. The
company official confirmed what was
revealed during the initial investigation.
In particular, the official stated that
Plasti-Coil, Inc., Lake Geneva,
Wisconsin was contemplating to move
portion of its production to China,
however, the shift did not occur and
there are no current plans to move
production from the subject firm to a
foreign country. The official further
clarified that the letter mentioned by the
petitioner meant that the subject firm’s
customers transferred significant
volumes of their business to China and
other Asian countries, which had a
negative impact on production of the
E:\FR\FM\24JAN1.SGM
24JAN1
]]>Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 71, Number 15 (Tuesday, January 24, 2006)]
[Notices]
[Pages 3886-3888]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E6-803]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
Employment and Training Administration
Notice of Determinations Regarding Eligibility To Apply for
Worker Adjustment Assistance
In accordance with Section 223 of the Trade Act of 1974, as
amended, (19 U.S.C. 2273), the Department of Labor herein presents
summaries of determinations regarding eligibility to apply for trade
adjustment assistance for workers (TA-W) number and alternative trade
adjustment assistance (ATAA) by (TA-W) number issued during the periods
of January 2006.
In order for an affirmative determination to be made and a
certification of eligibility to apply for directly-impacted (primary)
worker adjustment assistance to be issued, each of the group
eligibility requirements of Section 222(a) of the Act must be met.
I. Section (a)(2)(A) all of the following must be satisfied:
A. A significant number or proportion of the workers in such
workers' firm, or an appropriate subdivision of the firm, have become
totally or partially separated, or are threatened to become totally or
partially separated;
B. The sales or production, or both, of such firm or subdivision
have decreased absolutely; and
C. Increased imports of articles like or directly competitive with
articles produced by such firm or subdivision have contributed
importantly to such workers' separation or threat of separation and to
the decline in sales or production of such firm or subdivision; or
II. Section (a)(2)(B) both of the following must be satisfied:
A. A significant number or proportion of the workers in such
workers' firm, or an appropriate subdivision of the firm, have become
totally or partially separated, or are threatened to become totally or
partially separated;
B. There has been a shift in production by such workers' firm or
subdivision to a foreign country of articles like or directly
competitive with articles which are produced by such firm or
subdivision; and
C. One of the following must be satisfied:
1. The country to which the workers' firm has shifted production of
the articles is a party to a free trade agreement with the United
States;
2. The country to which the workers' firm has shifted production of
the articles to a beneficiary country under the Andean Trade Preference
Act,
[[Page 3887]]
African Growth and Opportunity Act, or the Caribbean Basin Economic
Recovery Act; or
3. There has been or is likely to be an increase in imports of
articles that are like or directly competitive with articles which are
or were produced by such firm or subdivision.
Also, in order for an affirmative determination to be made and a
certification of eligibility to apply for worker adjustment assistance
as an adversely affected secondary group to be issued, each of the
group eligibility requirements of Section 222(b) of the Act must be
met.
(1) Significant number or proportion of the workers in the workers'
firm or an appropriate subdivision of the firm have become totally or
partially separated, or are threatened to become totally or partially
separated;
(2) The workers' firm (or subdivision) is a supplier or downstream
producer to a firm (or subdivision) that employed a group of workers
who received a certification of eligibility to apply for trade
adjustment assistance benefits and such supply or production is related
to the article that was the basis for such certification; and
(3) Either--
(A) The workers' firm is a supplier and the component parts it
supplied for the firm (or subdivision) described in paragraph (2)
accounted for at least 20 percent of the production or sales of the
workers' firm; or
(B) A loss or business by the workers' firm with the firm (or
subdivision) described in paragraph (2) contributed importantly to the
workers' separation or threat of separation.
Affirmative Determinations for Worker Adjustment Assistance
The following certifications have been issued; the date following
the company name and location of each determination references the
impact date for all workers of such determination.
The following certifications have been issued. The requirements of
(a) (2) (A) (increased imports) of Section 222 have been met.
TA-W-58,327; Hewlett Packard, Ontario, CA, November 10, 2004.
TA-W-58,412; F. Schumacher and Company, Newark Customer Service
Facility, Newark, DE, November 28, 2004.
TA-W-58,526; IPF Management Company, Inc., d/b/a Invincible IPF,
Paterson, NJ, December 20, 2004.
TA-W-58,070; Carrier Access Corporation, Boulder, CO, October 4, 2004.
TA-W-58,326; Reliable Garment, Los Angeles, CA, November 10, 2004.
TA-W-58,401; Accutech Mold and Engineering, Little Falls, MN, November
22, 2004.
TA-W-58,456; WestPoint Home, Inc., Bath Products Div., Ambassador
Personnel, Valley, AL, December 2, 2004.
TA-W-57,987; Sun Chemical, Performance Pigments Division, Cincinnati,
OH, September 12, 2004.
TA-W-58,388; Chuan Hing Sewing, Inc., San Francisco, CA, November 21,
2004.
The following certifications have been issued. The requirements of
(a)(2)(B) (shift in production) of Section 222 have been met.
TA-W-58,396; Leesburg Knit Mill, Knitting Div., Union Underwear Co.,
Inc., Leesburg, AL, November 21, 2004.
TA-W-58,480; LeSportsac, Inc., Stearns, KY, November 30, 2004.
TA-W-58,499; Metaldyne Corporation, LLC, Heartland Industrial Partners,
Edon, OH, December 6, 2005.
TA-W-58,502; Wella Manufacturing of Virginia, USA Staffing, Spherion,
STAT, Aerotek, Will Rogers, Richmond, VA, November 28, 2004.
TA-W-58,295; Pixelworks, Inc., Tualatin, OR, November 4, 2004.
TA-W-58,295A; Pixelworks, Inc., Campbell, CA, November 4, 2004.
The following certification has been issued. The requirement of
supplier to a trade certified firm has been met.
None.
The following certification has been issued. The requirement of
downstream producer to a trade certified firm has been met.
None.
Negative Determinations for Worker Adjustment Assistance
In the following cases, the investigation revealed that the
criteria for eligibility have not been met for the reasons specified.
The investigation revealed that criterion (a)(2)(A)(I.A) and
(a)(2)(B)(II.A) (no employment decline) has not been met.
TA-W-58,413; Badger Paper Mills, BPM, Inc., Flexible Packaging Div.,
Oconton Falls, WI.
The investigation revealed that criteria (a)(2)(A)(I.B.) (Sales or
production, or both, did not decline) and (a)(2)(B)(II.B) (No shift in
production to a foreign country) have not been met.
None.
The investigation revealed that criteria (a)(2)(A)(I.C.) (increased
imports) and (a)(2)(B)(II.B) (No shift in production to a foreign
country) have not been met.
TA-W-58,421; Sony Electronics, Direct View CRT, Mt. Pleasant, PA.
TA-W-58,481; Collins and Aikman, Southwest Laminates, Inc. Division, El
Paso, TX.
TA-W-58,274; Saint-Gobain Container, Carteret, NJ.
The investigation revealed that criteria (a)(2)(A)(I.C.) (Increased
imports and (a)(2)(B)(II.C) (has shifted production to a foreign
country) have not been met.
None.
The workers firm does not produce an article as required for
certification under Section 222 of the Trade Act of 1974.
TA-W-58,487; U.S. Airways, Greentree Reservations, Pittsburgh, PA.
The investigation revealed that criteria (2) has not been met. The
workers firm (or subdivision) is not a supplier or downstream producer
to trade-affected companies.
None.
Affirmative Determinations for Alternative Trade Adjustment Assistance
In order for the Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance to issue a
certification of eligibility to apply for Alternative Trade Adjustment
Assistance (ATAA) for older workers, the group eligibility requirements
of Section 246(a)(3)(A)(ii) of the Trade Act must be met.
The following certifications have been issued; the date following
the company name and location of each determination references the
impact date for all workers of such determinations.
In the following cases, it has been determined that the
requirements of Section 246(a)(3)(ii) have been met.
I. Whether a significant number of workers in the workers' firm are
50 years of age or older.
II. Whether the workers in the workers' firm possess skills that
are not easily transferable.
III. The competitive conditions within the workers' industry (i.e.,
conditions within the industry are adverse).
TA-W-58,396; Leesburg Knit Mill, Knitting Div., Union Underwear Co.,
Inc., Leesburg, AL, November 21, 2004.
TA-W-58,480; LeSportsac, Inc., Stearns, KY, November 30, 2004.
TA-W-58,499; Metaldyne Corporation, LLC, Heartland Industrial Partners,
Edon, OH, December 6, 2005.
TA-W-58,502; Wella Manufacturing of Virginia, USA Staffing, Spherion,
[[Page 3888]]
STAT, Aerotek, Will Rogers, Richmond, VA, November 28, 2004.
TA-W-58,388; Chuan Hing Sewing, Inc., San Francisco, CA, November 21,
2004.
TA-W-58,456; WestPoint Home, Inc., Bath Products Div., Ambassador
Personnel, Valley, AL, December 2, 2004.
TA-W-58,327; Hewlett Packard, Ontario, CA, November 10, 2004.
TA-W-58,526; IPF Management Company, Inc., d/b/a Invincible IPF,
Paterson, NJ, December 20, 2004.
Negative Determinations for Alternative Trade Adjustment Assistance
In order for the Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance to issue a
certification of eligibility to apply for Alternative Trade Adjustment
Assistance (ATAA) for older workers, the group eligibility requirements
of Section 246(a)(3)(A)(ii) of the Trade Act must be met.
In the following cases, it has been determined that the
requirements of Section 246(a)(3)(ii) have not been met for the reasons
specified.
Since the workers are denied eligibility to apply for TAA, the
workers cannot be certified eligible for ATAA.
TA-W-58,487; U.S. Airways, Greentree Reservations, Pittsburgh, PA.
TA-W-58,274; Saint-Gobain Container, Carteret, NJ.
TA-W-58,421; Sony Electronics, Direct View CRT, Mt. Pleasant, PA.
TA-W-58,481; Collins and Aikman, Southwest Laminates, Inc. Division, El
Paso, TX.
The Department as determined that criterion (1) of Section 246 has
not been met. Workers at the firm are 50 years of age or older.
None.
The Department as determined that criterion (2) of Section 246 has
not been met. Workers at the firm possess skills that are easily
transferable.
TA-W-58,295; Pixelworks, Inc., Tualatin, OR.
TA-W-58,295A; Pixelworks, Inc., Campbell, CA.
TA-W-58,070; Carrier Access Corporation, Boulder, CO.
TA-W-58,401; Accutech Mold and Engineering, Little Falls, MN.
TA-W-57,987; Sun Chemical, Performance Pigments Division, Cincinnati,
OH.
The Department as determined that criterion (3) of Section 246 has
not been met. Competition conditions within the workers' industry are
not adverse.
None.
I hereby certify that the aforementioned determinations were issued
during the month of January 2006. Copies of these determinations are
available for inspection in Room C-5311, U.S. Department of Labor, 200
Constitution Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20210, during normal business
hours or will be mailed to persons who write to the above address.
Dated: January 12, 2006.
Erica R. Cantor,
Director, Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance.
[FR Doc. E6-803 Filed 1-23-06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510-30-P
