Silicomanganese From Brazil: Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review, 2516-2517 [E6-410]
Download as PDF
2516
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 10 / Tuesday, January 17, 2006 / Notices
Constitution Avenue, NW., Washington,
DC 20230 (or via the Internet at
dHynek@doc.gov).
Written comments and
recommendations for the proposed
information collection should be sent
within 30 days of publication of this
notice to David Rostker, OMB Desk
Officer, FAX number (202) 395–7285, or
David_Rostker@omb.eop.gov.
Dated: January 10, 2006.
Gwellnar Banks,
Management Analyst, Office of the Chief
Information Officer.
[FR Doc. E6–372 Filed 1–13–06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–22–P
Dated: January 10, 2006.
Yvette Springer,
Committee Liaison Officer.
[FR Doc. 06–394 Filed 1–13–06; 8:45 am]
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
Bureau of Industry and Security
Sensors and Instrumentation
Technical Advisory Committee; Notice
of Partially Closed Meeting
The Sensors and Instrumentation
Technical Advisory Committee (SITAC)
will meet on January 31, 2006, 9:30
a.m., in the Herbert C. Hoover Building,
Room 3884, 14th Street between
Constitution and Pennsylvania
Avenues, NW., Washington, DC. The
Committee advises the Office of the
Assistant Secretary for Export
Administration on technical questions
that affect the level of export controls
applicable to sensors and
instrumentation equipment and
technology.
Agenda
sroberts on PROD1PC69 with NOTICES
Public Session
1. Welcome and Introductions.
2. Remarks from the Bureau of
Industry and Security Management.
3. Industry Presentations.
4. New Business.
Closed Session
5. Discussion of matters determined to
be exempt from the provisions relating
to public meetings found in 5 U.S.C.
app. 2 §§ 10(a)(1) and 10(a)(3).
A limited number of seats will be
available during the public session of
the meeting. Reservations are not
accepted. To the extent that time
permits, members of the public may
present oral statements to the
Committee. The public may submit
written statements at any time before or
after the meeting. However, to facilitate
distribution of public presentation
materials to the Committee members,
the Committee suggests that the
materials be forwarded before the
meeting to Ms. Yvette Springer at
Yspringer@bis.doc.gov.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:57 Jan 13, 2006
Jkt 208001
The Assistant Secretary for
Administration, with the concurrence of
the General Counsel, formally
determined on January 6, 2006,
pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal
Advisory Committee Act, as amended (5
U.S.C. app. 2 § 10(d)), that the portion
of this meeting dealing with predecisional changes to the Commerce
Control List and U.S. export control
policies shall be exempt from the
provisions relating to public meetings
found in 5 U.S.C. app. 2 §§ 10(a)(1) and
10(a)(3). The remaining portions of the
meeting will be open to the public.
For more information contact Yvette
Springer on (202) 482–4814.
BILLING CODE 3510–JT–M
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
[A–351–824]
Silicomanganese From Brazil: Final
Results of Antidumping Duty
Administrative Review
Import Administration,
International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce..
SUMMARY: On September 9, 2005, the
Department of Commerce published the
preliminary results of the administrative
review of the antidumping duty order
on silicomanganese from Brazil. The
review covers exports of this
merchandise to the United States by the
ˆ
collapsed parties, Rio Doce Manganes
S.A. (RDM), Companhia Paulista de
Ferro–Ligas (CPFL), and Urucum
Mineracao S.A. (Urucum) (collectively
¸˜
RDM/CPFL), for the period December 1,
2003, through November 30, 2004. We
gave interested parties an opportunity to
comment on the preliminary results.
Based on our analysis of the comments
received, we have made a change in the
margin calculation for the final results
of this review. The final weighted–
average margin is listed below in the
‘‘Final Results of Review’’ section of this
notice.
EFFECTIVE DATE: January 17, 2006.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Yang Jin Chun at (202) 482–5760 or
Dmitry Vladimirov at (202) 482–0665,
AD/CVD Operations, Office 5, Import
Administration, International Trade
Administration, U.S. Department of
Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution
Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20230.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
AGENCY:
PO 00000
Frm 00005
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Background
On September 9, 2005, the
Department of Commerce (the
Department) published the preliminary
results of this review and invited parties
to comment. See Silicomanganese From
Brazil: Preliminary Results of
Antidumping Duty Administrative
Review, 70 FR 53628 (Preliminary
Results). On October 10, 2005, RDM/
CPFL, the respondent, filed a case brief.
Eramet Marietta, the petitioner, did not
file case or rebuttal briefs.
Scope of the Order
The merchandise covered by this
order is silicomanganese.
Silicomanganese, which is sometimes
called ferrosilicon manganese, is a
ferroalloy composed principally of
manganese, silicon and iron, and
normally contains much smaller
proportions of minor elements, such as
carbon, phosphorus, and sulfur.
Silicomanganese generally contains by
weight not less than 4 percent iron,
more than 30 percent manganese, more
than 8 percent silicon, and not more
than 3 percent phosphorous. All
compositions, forms, and sizes of
silicomanganese are included within the
scope of the order, including
silicomanganese slag, fines, and
briquettes. Silicomanganese is used
primarily in steel production as a source
of both silicon and manganese.
Silicomanganese is currently
classifiable under subheading
7202.30.0000 of the Harmonized Tariff
Schedule of the United States (HTSUS).
Some silicomanganese may also
currently be classifiable under HTSUS
subheading 7202.99.5040. This order
covers all silicomanganese, regardless of
its tariff classification. Although the
HTSUS subheadings are provided for
convenience and customs purposes, the
written description of the order remains
dispositive.
Analysis of Comments Received
All issues raised in RDM/CPFL’s case
brief in the context of this
administrative review are addressed in
the January 9, 2006, Issues and Decision
Memorandum for the Final Results of
the Administrative Review of the
Antidumping Duty Order on
Silicomanganese from Brazil December
1, 2003, through November 30, 2004
(the Decision Memorandum), which is
hereby adopted by this notice. Attached
to this notice as an appendix is a list of
the issues that RDM/CPFL has raised
and to which we have responded in the
Decision Memorandum. Parties can find
a complete discussion of all issues
raised in this review and the
E:\FR\FM\17JAN1.SGM
17JAN1
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 10 / Tuesday, January 17, 2006 / Notices
corresponding recommendations in this
public memorandum, which is on file in
the Central Records Unit, Room B–099
of the main Department building. In
addition, a complete version of the
Decision Memorandum can be accessed
directly on the Internet at https://
ia.ita.doc.gov/frn. The paper copy and
electronic version of the Decision
Memorandum are identical in content.
Sales Below Cost in the Home Market
The Department conducted an
investigation to determine whether
RDM/CPFL made home–market sales at
prices below the cost of production. See
Preliminary Results, 70 FR at 53630. As
a result of its investigation, the
Department disregarded certain below–
cost home–market sales for these final
results.
Changes Since the Preliminary Results
Based on our analysis of the
comments received, we have made a
change in the margin calculation for the
final results of this review and
described the change in the
accompanying Issues and Decision
Memorandum dated January 9, 2006.
See also Analysis Memorandum for the
Final Results of the Administrative
Review of the Antidumping Duty Order
on Silicomanganese from Brazil: Rio
ˆ
Doce Manganes S.A. (RDM), Companhia
Paulista de Ferro–Ligas (CPFL), and
Urucum Mineracao S.A. (Urucum)
¸˜
(collectively, RDM/CPFL), dated January
9, 2006.
sroberts on PROD1PC69 with NOTICES
Final Results of Review
As a result of our review, we
determine that a margin of 0.00 percent
exists for RDM/CPFL for the period
December 1, 2003, through November
30, 2004.
Duty Assessment and Cash–Deposit
Requirements
The Department shall determine, and
U.S. Customs and Border Protection
(CBP) shall assess, antidumping duties
on all appropriate entries. In accordance
with 19 CFR 351.212(b)(1), we have
calculated an importer–specific per–
unit dollar amount for the subject
merchandise. The Department will issue
appropriate assessment instructions
directly to CBP within 15 days of
publication of these final results of
review.
The following deposit requirements
will be effective upon publication of
this notice of final results of
administrative review for all shipments
of silicomanganese entered, or
withdrawn from warehouse, for
consumption on or after the publication
date of the final results, as provided by
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:57 Jan 13, 2006
Jkt 208001
section 751(a)(2)(C) of the Act: (1) the
cash–deposit rate for RDM/CPFL will be
0.00 percent; (2) for previously reviewed
or investigated companies not
mentioned above, the cash–deposit rate
will continue to be the company–
specific rate published for the most
recent period; (3) if the exporter is not
a firm covered in this review, a prior
review, or the less–than-fair–value
(LTFV) investigation but the
manufacturer is, then the cash–deposit
rate will be the rate established for the
most recent period for the manufacturer
of the merchandise; and (4) if neither
the exporter nor the producer is a firm
covered in this review, a prior review,
or the LTFV investigation, the cash–
deposit rate shall be 17.60 percent, the
all–others rate established in the LTFV
investigation. See Notice of Final
Determination of Sales at Less Than
Fair Value: Silicomanganese from
Brazil, 59 FR 55432 (November 7, 1994).
These deposit requirements shall
remain in effect until publication of the
final results of the next administrative
review.
Notification to Importers
This notice serves as a primary
reminder to importers of their
responsibility under 19 CFR 351.402(f)
to file a certificate regarding the
reimbursement of antidumping duties
prior to liquidation of the relevant
entries during this review period.
Failure to comply with this requirement
could result in the Secretary’s
presumption that reimbursement of
antidumping duties occurred and the
subsequent assessment of double
antidumping duties.
Notification Regarding APOs
This notice also serves as a reminder
to parties subject to administrative
protective orders (APO) of their
responsibility concerning the
disposition of proprietary information
disclosed under APO as explained in
the APO itself. Timely written
notification of the return/destruction of
APO materials or conversion to judicial
protective order is hereby requested.
Failure to comply with the regulations
and terms of an APO is a sanctionable
violation.
We are publishing these final results
of administrative review and notice in
accordance with sections 751(a)(1) and
777(i)(1) of the Act.
PO 00000
Frm 00006
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
2517
Dated: January 9, 2006.
David M. Spooner,
Assistant Secretary for Import
Administration.
APPENDIX—Issues in the Decision
Memorandum
Comment 1: Affiliation with Certain
Home–Market Customers
Comment 2: U.S. Gross Unit Price
[FR Doc. E6–410 Filed 1–13–06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–DS–S
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
[A–570–601]
Tapered Roller Bearings and Parts
Thereof, Finished and Unfinished, from
the People’s Republic of China: Final
Results of 2003–2004 Administrative
Review and Partial Rescission of
Review
Import Administration,
International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce
(‘‘the Department’’) published its
preliminary results of administrative
review of the antidumping duty order
on tapered roller bearings and parts
thereof, finished and unfinished
(‘‘TRBs’’), from the People’s Republic of
China (‘‘PRC’’) on July 11, 2005. The
period of review (‘‘POR’’) is June 1,
2003, through May 31, 2004. We invited
interested parties to comment on our
preliminary results. Based on our
analysis of the comments received, we
have made changes to our margin
calculations. Therefore, the final results
differ from the preliminary results. The
final dumping margins for this review
are listed in the ‘‘Final Results of
Review’’ section below.
EFFECTIVE DATE: January 17, 2006.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Laurel LaCivita, Eugene Degnan or Hua
Lu, Office 8, AD/CVD Operations, Office
8, Import Administration, International
Trade Administration, U.S. Department
of Commerce, 14th Street and
Constitution Avenue, NW., Washington,
DC 20230; telephone (202) 482–4243,
(202) 482–0414 or (202) 482–6478,
respectively.
AGENCY:
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
On July 11, 2005, the Department
published its preliminary results. See
Tapered Roller Bearings and Parts
Thereof, Finished and Unfinished, from
the People’s Republic of China:
Preliminary Results of 2003–2004
E:\FR\FM\17JAN1.SGM
17JAN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 71, Number 10 (Tuesday, January 17, 2006)]
[Notices]
[Pages 2516-2517]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E6-410]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
[A-351-824]
Silicomanganese From Brazil: Final Results of Antidumping Duty
Administrative Review
AGENCY: Import Administration, International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce..
SUMMARY: On September 9, 2005, the Department of Commerce published the
preliminary results of the administrative review of the antidumping
duty order on silicomanganese from Brazil. The review covers exports of
this merchandise to the United States by the collapsed parties, Rio
Doce Mangan[ecirc]s S.A. (RDM), Companhia Paulista de Ferro-Ligas
(CPFL), and Urucum Minera[ccedil][atilde]o S.A. (Urucum) (collectively
RDM/CPFL), for the period December 1, 2003, through November 30, 2004.
We gave interested parties an opportunity to comment on the preliminary
results. Based on our analysis of the comments received, we have made a
change in the margin calculation for the final results of this review.
The final weighted-average margin is listed below in the ``Final
Results of Review'' section of this notice.
EFFECTIVE DATE: January 17, 2006.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Yang Jin Chun at (202) 482-5760 or
Dmitry Vladimirov at (202) 482-0665, AD/CVD Operations, Office 5,
Import Administration, International Trade Administration, U.S.
Department of Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution Avenue, NW.,
Washington, DC 20230.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
On September 9, 2005, the Department of Commerce (the Department)
published the preliminary results of this review and invited parties to
comment. See Silicomanganese From Brazil: Preliminary Results of
Antidumping Duty Administrative Review, 70 FR 53628 (Preliminary
Results). On October 10, 2005, RDM/CPFL, the respondent, filed a case
brief. Eramet Marietta, the petitioner, did not file case or rebuttal
briefs.
Scope of the Order
The merchandise covered by this order is silicomanganese.
Silicomanganese, which is sometimes called ferrosilicon manganese, is a
ferroalloy composed principally of manganese, silicon and iron, and
normally contains much smaller proportions of minor elements, such as
carbon, phosphorus, and sulfur. Silicomanganese generally contains by
weight not less than 4 percent iron, more than 30 percent manganese,
more than 8 percent silicon, and not more than 3 percent phosphorous.
All compositions, forms, and sizes of silicomanganese are included
within the scope of the order, including silicomanganese slag, fines,
and briquettes. Silicomanganese is used primarily in steel production
as a source of both silicon and manganese.
Silicomanganese is currently classifiable under subheading
7202.30.0000 of the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States
(HTSUS). Some silicomanganese may also currently be classifiable under
HTSUS subheading 7202.99.5040. This order covers all silicomanganese,
regardless of its tariff classification. Although the HTSUS subheadings
are provided for convenience and customs purposes, the written
description of the order remains dispositive.
Analysis of Comments Received
All issues raised in RDM/CPFL's case brief in the context of this
administrative review are addressed in the January 9, 2006, Issues and
Decision Memorandum for the Final Results of the Administrative Review
of the Antidumping Duty Order on Silicomanganese from Brazil December
1, 2003, through November 30, 2004 (the Decision Memorandum), which is
hereby adopted by this notice. Attached to this notice as an appendix
is a list of the issues that RDM/CPFL has raised and to which we have
responded in the Decision Memorandum. Parties can find a complete
discussion of all issues raised in this review and the
[[Page 2517]]
corresponding recommendations in this public memorandum, which is on
file in the Central Records Unit, Room B-099 of the main Department
building. In addition, a complete version of the Decision Memorandum
can be accessed directly on the Internet at https://ia.ita.doc.gov/frn.
The paper copy and electronic version of the Decision Memorandum are
identical in content.
Sales Below Cost in the Home Market
The Department conducted an investigation to determine whether RDM/
CPFL made home-market sales at prices below the cost of production. See
Preliminary Results, 70 FR at 53630. As a result of its investigation,
the Department disregarded certain below-cost home-market sales for
these final results.
Changes Since the Preliminary Results
Based on our analysis of the comments received, we have made a
change in the margin calculation for the final results of this review
and described the change in the accompanying Issues and Decision
Memorandum dated January 9, 2006. See also Analysis Memorandum for the
Final Results of the Administrative Review of the Antidumping Duty
Order on Silicomanganese from Brazil: Rio Doce Mangan[ecirc]s S.A.
(RDM), Companhia Paulista de Ferro-Ligas (CPFL), and Urucum
Minera[ccedil][atilde]o S.A. (Urucum) (collectively, RDM/CPFL), dated
January 9, 2006.
Final Results of Review
As a result of our review, we determine that a margin of 0.00
percent exists for RDM/CPFL for the period December 1, 2003, through
November 30, 2004.
Duty Assessment and Cash-Deposit Requirements
The Department shall determine, and U.S. Customs and Border
Protection (CBP) shall assess, antidumping duties on all appropriate
entries. In accordance with 19 CFR 351.212(b)(1), we have calculated an
importer-specific per-unit dollar amount for the subject merchandise.
The Department will issue appropriate assessment instructions directly
to CBP within 15 days of publication of these final results of review.
The following deposit requirements will be effective upon
publication of this notice of final results of administrative review
for all shipments of silicomanganese entered, or withdrawn from
warehouse, for consumption on or after the publication date of the
final results, as provided by section 751(a)(2)(C) of the Act: (1) the
cash-deposit rate for RDM/CPFL will be 0.00 percent; (2) for previously
reviewed or investigated companies not mentioned above, the cash-
deposit rate will continue to be the company-specific rate published
for the most recent period; (3) if the exporter is not a firm covered
in this review, a prior review, or the less-than-fair-value (LTFV)
investigation but the manufacturer is, then the cash-deposit rate will
be the rate established for the most recent period for the manufacturer
of the merchandise; and (4) if neither the exporter nor the producer is
a firm covered in this review, a prior review, or the LTFV
investigation, the cash-deposit rate shall be 17.60 percent, the all-
others rate established in the LTFV investigation. See Notice of Final
Determination of Sales at Less Than Fair Value: Silicomanganese from
Brazil, 59 FR 55432 (November 7, 1994). These deposit requirements
shall remain in effect until publication of the final results of the
next administrative review.
Notification to Importers
This notice serves as a primary reminder to importers of their
responsibility under 19 CFR 351.402(f) to file a certificate regarding
the reimbursement of antidumping duties prior to liquidation of the
relevant entries during this review period. Failure to comply with this
requirement could result in the Secretary's presumption that
reimbursement of antidumping duties occurred and the subsequent
assessment of double antidumping duties.
Notification Regarding APOs
This notice also serves as a reminder to parties subject to
administrative protective orders (APO) of their responsibility
concerning the disposition of proprietary information disclosed under
APO as explained in the APO itself. Timely written notification of the
return/destruction of APO materials or conversion to judicial
protective order is hereby requested. Failure to comply with the
regulations and terms of an APO is a sanctionable violation.
We are publishing these final results of administrative review and
notice in accordance with sections 751(a)(1) and 777(i)(1) of the Act.
Dated: January 9, 2006.
David M. Spooner,
Assistant Secretary for Import Administration.
APPENDIX--Issues in the Decision Memorandum
Comment 1: Affiliation with Certain Home-Market Customers
Comment 2: U.S. Gross Unit Price
[FR Doc. E6-410 Filed 1-13-06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-S