Notice of Determinations Regarding Eligibility To Apply for Worker Adjustment Assistance, 2567-2569 [E6-390]
Download as PDF
<![CDATA[
2567
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 10 / Tuesday, January 17, 2006 / Notices
Signed at Washington, DC this 10h day of
January 2006.
Erica R. Cantor,
Director, Division of Trade Adjustment
Assistance.
[FR Doc. E6–386 Filed 1–13–06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510–30–P
DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
Employment and Training
Administration
Investigations Regarding Certifications
of Eligibility To Apply for Worker
Adjustment Assistance
Petitions have been filed with the
Secretary of Labor under Section 221(a)
of the Trade Act of 1974 (‘‘the Act’’) and
are identified in the Appendix to this
notice. Upon receipt of these petitions,
the Director of the Division of Trade
Adjustment Assistance, Employment
and Training Administration, has
instituted investigations pursuant to
Section 221(a) of the Act.
The purpose of each of the
investigations is to determine whether
the workers are eligible to apply for
adjustment assistance under Title II,
Chapter 2, of the Act. The investigations
will further relate, as appropriate, to the
determination of the date on which total
or partial separations began or
threatened to begin and the subdivision
of the firm involved.
The petitioners or any other persons
showing a substantial interest in the
subject matter of the investigations may
request a public hearing, provided such
request is filed in writing with the
Director, Division of Trade Adjustment
Assistance, at the address shown below,
not later than January 27, 2006.
Interested persons are invited to
submit written comments regarding the
subject matter of the investigations to
the Director, Division of Trade
Adjustment Assistance, at the address
shown below, not later than January 27,
2006.
The petitions filed in this case are
available for inspection at the Office of
the Director, Division of Trade
Adjustment Assistance, Employment
and Training Administration, U.S.
Department of Labor, Room C–5311, 200
Constitution Avenue, NW., Washington,
DC 20210.
Signed at Washington, DC this 10th day of
January 2006.
Erica R. Cantor,
Director, Division of Trade Adjustment
Assistance.
APPENDIX
[TAA petitions instituted between 12/26/05 and 12/30/05]
Subject firm
(petitioners)
Location
Nicholson Manufacturing Company (Wkrs) ..........................
Keeler Brass Company (Comp) ...........................................
Vision Knit Technology, Inc. (Comp) ....................................
Baxter—Financial Center of Excellence (Comp) .................
Werner Company (Comp) ....................................................
Parker Hannifin Corp. (IAM) .................................................
P and C Quality Turned Components (Wkrs) ......................
Logistics Services, Inc. (Comp) ............................................
Penske Logistics (UAW) .......................................................
Carolina Mirror (Wkrs) ..........................................................
Dannex Printing Corporation (Wkrs) ....................................
Thomas C. Wilson, Inc. (State) ............................................
T and H Sewing Co. (Wkrs) .................................................
Bennett Forest Industries (Comp) ........................................
Lustrik, Inc. (Wkrs) ...............................................................
Scholle Packaging (Comp) ...................................................
Authentic Specialty Foods, Inc. (State) ................................
Lizette Creations, Inc. (State) ...............................................
Seattle, WA ...........................
Grand Rapids, MI ..................
Gastonia, NC ........................
Deerfield, IL ...........................
Carrollton, KY ........................
Lebanon, TN .........................
Esmond, RI ...........................
Oklahoma City, OK ...............
Oklahoma City, OK ...............
N. Wilkesboro, NC ................
Wood-Ridge, NJ ....................
Long Island City, NY .............
San Francisco, CA ................
Grangeville, ID ......................
Philadelphia, PA ....................
Rancho Dominguez, CA .......
Rosemead, CA ......................
Long Beach, CA ....................
TA–W
58547
58548
58549
58550
58551
58552
58553
58554
58555
58556
58557
58558
58559
58560
58561
58562
58563
58564
................
................
................
................
................
................
................
................
................
................
................
................
................
................
................
................
................
................
[FR Doc. E6–387 Filed 1–13–06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510–30–P
DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
Employment and Training
Administration
sroberts on PROD1PC69 with NOTICES
Notice of Determinations Regarding
Eligibility To Apply for Worker
Adjustment Assistance
In accordance with Section 223 of the
Trade Act of 1974, as amended, (19
U.S.C. 2273), the Department of Labor
herein presents summaries of
determinations regarding eligibility to
apply for trade adjustment assistance for
workers (TA–W) number and alternative
trade adjustment assistance (ATAA) by
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:57 Jan 13, 2006
Jkt 208001
(TA–W) number issued during the
periods of December 2005.
In order for an affirmative
determination to be made and a
certification of eligibility to apply for
directly-impacted (primary) worker
adjustment assistance to be issued, each
of the group eligibility requirements of
Section 222(a) of the Act must be met.
I. Section (a)(2)(A) all of the following
must be satisfied:
A. A significant number or proportion
of the workers in such workers’
firm, or an appropriate subdivision
of the firm, have become totally or
partially separated, or are
threatened to become totally or
partially separated;
B. The sales or production, or both, of
such firm or subdivision have
decreased absolutely; and
PO 00000
Frm 00056
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Date of
institution
12/27/05
12/27/05
12/28/05
12/28/05
12/28/05
12/29/05
12/29/05
12/30/05
12/30/05
12/30/05
12/30/05
12/30/05
12/30/05
12/30/05
12/30/05
12/30/05
12/30/05
12/30/05
Date of
petition
12/23/05
12/27/05
12/16/05
12/28/05
12/22/05
12/29/05
12/28/05
12/09/05
12/09/05
12/29/05
12/14/05
12/19/05
12/16/05
12/16/05
12/19/05
12/30/05
12/30/05
12/30/05
C. Increased imports of articles like or
directly competitive with articles
produced by such firm or
subdivision have contributed
importantly to such workers’
separation or threat of separation
and to the decline in sales or
production of such firm or
subdivision; or
II. Section (a)(2)(B) both of the following
must be satisfied:
A. A significant number or proportion
of the workers in such workers’
firm, or an appropriate subdivision
of the firm, have become totally or
partially separated, or are
threatened to become totally or
partially separated;
B. There has been a shift in
production by such workers’ firm or
subdivision to a foreign country of
E:\FR\FM\17JAN1.SGM
17JAN1
2568
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 10 / Tuesday, January 17, 2006 / Notices
sroberts on PROD1PC69 with NOTICES
articles like or directly competitive
with articles which are produced by
such firm or subdivision; and
C. One of the following must be
satisfied:
1. The country to which the workers’
firm has shifted production of the
articles is a party to a free trade
agreement with the United States;
2. The country to which the workers’
firm has shifted production of the
articles to a beneficiary country
under the Andean Trade Preference
Act, African Growth and
Opportunity Act, or the Caribbean
Basin Economic Recovery Act; or
3. There has been or is likely to be an
increase in imports of articles that
are like or directly competitive with
articles which are or were produced
by such firm or subdivision.
Also, in order for an affirmative
determination to be made and a
certification of eligibility to apply for
worker adjustment assistance as an
adversely affected secondary group to be
issued, each of the group eligibility
requirements of Section 222(b) of the
Act must be met.
(1) Significant number or proportion
of the workers in the workers’ firm or
an appropriate subdivision of the firm
have become totally or partially
separated, or are threatened to become
totally or partially separated;
(2) The workers’ firm (or subdivision)
is a supplier or downstream producer to
a firm (or subdivision) that employed a
group of workers who received a
certification of eligibility to apply for
trade adjustment assistance benefits and
such supply or production is related to
the article that was the basis for such
certification; and
(3) either—
(A) the workers’ firm is a supplier and
the component parts it supplied for the
firm (or subdivision) described in
paragraph (2) accounted for at least 20
percent of the production or sales of the
workers’ firm; or
(B) a loss or business by the workers’
firm with the firm (or subdivision)
described in paragraph (2) contributed
importantly to the workers’ separation
or threat of separation.
Affirmative Determinations for Worker
Adjustment Assistance
The following certifications have been
issued; the date following the company
name and location of each
determination references the impact
date for all workers of such
determination.
The following certifications have been
issued. The requirements of (a)(2)(A)
(increased imports) of Section 222 have
been met.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:57 Jan 13, 2006
Jkt 208001
TA–W–58,375; Spartacraft, Inc.,
Connelly Springs, NC, November
15, 2004.
TA–W–58,386; Shepherd Hardware
Products, LLC, Three Oaks, MI,
November 16, 2004.
TA–W–58,469; Rockford Corporation,
Adecco Services, Walker, MI,
November 29, 2004.
TA–W–58,484; Big River Zinc
Corporation, Sauget, IL, December
7, 2004.
TA–W–58,346; Weavetex, Inc.,
Jonesville, SC, November 14, 2004.
TA–W–58,359; Strongwater Group, LLC
(The), Moonachie, NJ, November 16,
2004.
TA–W–58,359A; Strongwater Group,
LLC (The), Englewood, NJ,
November 16, 2004.
TA–W–58,359B; Strongwater Group, LLC
(The), Tetate, CA, November 16,
2004.
TA–W–58,385; Car Component
Technologies, A Subsidiary of
American Remanufacturers, Inc.,
Bedford, NH, November 18, 2004.
TA–W–58,385A; Car Component
Technologies, A Subsidiary of
American Remanufacturers,
Distribution Center, Merrimack,
NH, November 18, 2004.
TA–W–58,425; Carolina Mills, Inc.,
Corporate Headquarters, Maiden,
NC, November 30, 2004.
The following certifications have been
issued. The requirements of (a)(2)(B)
(shift in production) of Section 222 have
been met.
TA–W–58,371; Carhartt, Inc., Sebree,
KY, November 17, 2004.
TA–W–58,371A; Carhartt, Inc.,
Morehead, KY, November 17, 2004.
TA–W–58,371B; Carhartt, Inc., Glasgow,
KY, November 17, 2004.
TA–W–58,447; May and Scofield, LLC,
Madison, SD, December 1, 2004.
TA–W–58,512; Tri-State Hospital
Supply Corp., Salisbury, NC,
December 16, 2004.
TA–W–58,345; Formica Corporation,
Odenton, MD, November 14, 2004.
TA–W–58,363; Thomasville Furniture
Ind., Inc., Corporate Office,
Thomasville, NC, March 11, 2005.
TA–W–58,367; Springfield Wire, Inc.,
Leased Wkrs of Summit Careers,
Spherion Staffing, Valley
Employment, Springfield, MA,
November 10, 2004.
The following certification has been
issued. The requirement of supplier to
a trade certified firm has been met.
TA–W–58,419; Dean Company (The),
Princeton, WV, November 29, 2004.
The following certification has been
issued. The requirement of downstream
producer to a trade certified firm has
been met.
PO 00000
Frm 00057
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
None
Negative Determinations for Worker
Adjustment Assistance
In the following cases, the
investigation revealed that the criteria
for eligibility have not been met for the
reasons specified.
The investigation revealed that
criterion (a)(2)(A)(I.A) and (a)(2)(B)(II.A)
(no employment decline) has not been
met.
TA–W–58,390; JK Tool, A Subsidiary of
Siegel—Robert, Inc., Portageville,
MO.
The investigation revealed that
criteria (a)(2)(A)(I.B.) (Sales or
production, or both, did not decline)
and (a)(2)(B)(II.B) (No shift in
production to a foreign country) have
not been met.
TA–W–58,435; Paxar Americas, Inc.,
Systems Div., Adecco, Sayre, PA.
The investigation revealed that
criteria (a)(2)(A)(I.C.) (increased
imports) and (a)(2)(B)(II.B) (No shift in
production to a foreign country) have
not been met.
TA–W–58,202; Key Plastics, Hamilton,
IN.
TA–W–58,485; Rawlings Sporting
Goods, A Subsidiary of K2, Inc.,
Licking, MO.
TA–W–58,158; Falcon Plastics,
Washington, PA.
TA–W–58,372; Tin, Inc., dba Temple
Inland, Inc., Corrugated Packaging
Division, Newark, DE.
The investigation revealed that
criteria (a)(2)(A)(I.C.) (Increased imports
and (a)(2)(B)(II.C) (has shifted
production to a foreign country) have
not been met.
None
The workers firm does not produce an
article as required for certification under
Section 222 of the Trade Act of 1974.
TA–W–58,287; Agilent Technologies,
Global Infrastructure Services,
Customer & Quality, Loveland, CO.
TA–W–58,406; Adobe Air, Phoenix, AZ.
TA–W–58,428; Apple Computer, Inc.,
Continuation Engineering
Department, Cupertino, CA.
The investigation revealed that
criteria (2) has not been met. The
workers firm (or subdivision) is not a
supplier or downstream producer to
trade-affected companies.
None
Affirmative Determinations for
Alternative Trade Adjustment
Assistance
In order for the Division of Trade
Adjustment Assistance to issue a
E:\FR\FM\17JAN1.SGM
17JAN1
sroberts on PROD1PC69 with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 10 / Tuesday, January 17, 2006 / Notices
certification of eligibility to apply for
Alternative Trade Adjustment
Assistance (ATAA) for older workers,
the group eligibility requirements of
Section 246(a)(3)(A)(ii) of the Trade Act
must be met.
The following certifications have been
issued; the date following the company
name and location of each
determination references the impact
date for all workers of such
determinations.
In the following cases, it has been
determined that the requirements of
Section 246(a)(3)(ii) have been met.
I. Whether a significant number of
workers in the workers’ firm are 50
years of age or older.
II. Whether the workers in the
workers’ firm possess skills that are not
easily transferable.
III. The competitive conditions within
the workers’ industry (i.e., conditions
within the industry are adverse).
TA–W–58,375; Spartacraft, Inc.,
Connelly Springs, NC, November
15, 2004.
TA–W–58,386; Shepherd Hardware
Products, LLC, Three Oaks, MI,
November 16, 2004.
TA–W–58,469; Rockford Corporation,
Adecco Services, Walker, MI,
November 29, 2004.
TA–W–58,484; Big River Zinc
Corporation, Sauget, IL, December
7, 2004.
TA–W–58,346; Weavetex, Inc.,
Jonesville, SC, November 14, 2004.
TA–W–58,359; Strongwater Group, LLC
(The), Moonachie, NJ, November 16,
2004.
TA–W–58,359A; Strongwater Group,
LLC (The), Englewood, NJ,
November 16, 2004.
TA–W–58,359B; Strongwater Group, LLC
(The), Tetate, CA, November 16,
2004.
TA–W–58,385; Car Component
Technologies, A Subsidiary of
American Remanufacturers, Inc.,
Bedford, NH, November 18, 2004.
TA–W–58,385A; Car Component
Technologies, A Subsidiary of
American Remanufacturers,
Distribution Center, Merrimack,
NH, November 18, 2004.
TA–W–58,425; Carolina Mills, Inc.,
Corporate Headquarters, Maiden,
NC, November 30, 2004.
TA–W–58,371; Carhartt, Inc., Sebree,
KY, November 17, 2004.
TA–W–58,371A; Carhartt, Inc.,
Morehead, KY, November 17, 2004.
TA–W–58,371B; Carhartt, Inc., Glasgow,
KY, November 17, 2004.
TA–W–58,447; May and Scofield, LLC,
Madison, SD, December 1, 2004.
TA–W–58,512; Tri-State Hospital
Supply Corp., Salisbury, NC,
December 16, 2004.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:57 Jan 13, 2006
Jkt 208001
TA–W–58,363; Thomasville Furniture
Ind., Inc., Corporate Office,
Thomasville, NC, March 11, 2005.
TA–W–58,367; Springfield Wire, Inc.,
Leased Wkrs of Summit Careers,
Spherion Staffing, Valley
Employment, Springfield, MA,
November 10, 2004.
TA–W–58,419; Dean Company (The),
Princeton, WV, November 29, 2004.
Negative Determinations for Alternative
Trade Adjustment Assistance
In order for the Division of Trade
Adjustment Assistance to issue a
certification of eligibility to apply for
Alternative Trade Adjustment
Assistance (ATAA) for older workers,
the group eligibility requirements of
Section 246(a)(3)(A)(ii) of the Trade Act
must be met.
In the following cases, it has been
determined that the requirements of
Section 246(a)(3)(ii) have not been met
for the reasons specified.
Since the workers are denied
eligibility to apply for TAA, the workers
cannot be certified eligible for ATAA.
TA–W–58,390; JK Tool, A Subsidiary of
Siegel—Robert, Inc., Portageville,
MO.
TA–W–58,435; Paxar Americas, Inc.,
Systems Div., Adecco, Sayre, PA.
TA–W–58,158; Falcon Plastics,
Washington, PA.
TA–W–58,372; Tin, Inc., dba Temple
Inland, Inc., Corrugated Packaging
Division, Newark, DE.
TA–W–58,202; Key Plastics, Hamilton,
IN.
TA–W–58,485; Rawlings Sporting
Goods, A Subsidiary of K2, Inc.,
Licking, MO.
TA–W–58,287; Agilent Technologies,
Global Infrastructure Services,
Customer & Quality, Loveland, CO.
TA–W–58,406; Adobe Air, Phoenix, AZ.
TA–W–58,428; Apple Computer, Inc.,
Continuation Engineering
Department, Cupertino, CA.
The Department as determined that
criterion (1) of Section 246 has not been
met. Workers at the firm are 50 years of
age or older.
None
The Department as determined that
criterion (2) of Section 246 has not been
met. Workers at the firm possess skills
that are easily transferable.
TA–W–58,345; Formica Corporation,
Odenton, MD, November 14, 2004.
The Department as determined that
criterion (3) of Section 246 has not been
met. Competition conditions within the
workers’ industry are not adverse.
PO 00000
Frm 00058
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
2569
None
I hereby certify that the aforementioned
determinations were issued during the month
of December 2005. Copies of these
determinations are available for inspection in
Room C–5311, U.S. Department of Labor, 200
Constitution Avenue, NW., Washington, DC
20210 during normal business hours or will
be mailed to persons who write to the above
address.
Dated: January 10, 2006.
Erica R. Cantor,
Director, Division of Trade Adjustment
Assistance.
[FR Doc. E6–390 Filed 1–13–06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510–30–P
DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
Employment and Training
Administration
[TA–W–58,519]
Tri-Mountain Machining, Idledale, CO;
Notice of Termination of Investigation
Pursuant to Section 221 of the Trade
Act of 1974, as amended, an
investigation was initiated on December
20, 2005 in response to a petition filed
by a state workforce representative on
behalf of workers at TRI-Mountain
Machining, Idledale, Colorado.
The state workforce representative has
requested that the petition be
withdrawn. Consequently, the
investigation has been terminated.
Signed at Washington, DC this 5th day of
January, 2006
Elliott S. Kushner,
Certifying Officer, Division of Trade
Adjustment Assistance.
[FR Doc. E6–388 Filed 1–13–06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510–30–P
NATIONAL AERONAUTICS AND
SPACE ADMINISTRATION
[06–001]
Notice of Information Collection
National Aeronautics and
Space Administration (NASA).
ACTION: Notice of information collection.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: The National Aeronautics and
Space Administration, as part of its
continuing effort to reduce paperwork
and respondent burden, invites the
general public and other Federal
agencies to take this opportunity to
comment on proposed and/or
continuing information collections, as
required by the Paperwork Reduction
Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104–13, 44 U.S.C.
3506(c)(2)(A)).
E:\FR\FM\17JAN1.SGM
17JAN1
]]>Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 71, Number 10 (Tuesday, January 17, 2006)]
[Notices]
[Pages 2567-2569]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E6-390]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
Employment and Training Administration
Notice of Determinations Regarding Eligibility To Apply for
Worker Adjustment Assistance
In accordance with Section 223 of the Trade Act of 1974, as
amended, (19 U.S.C. 2273), the Department of Labor herein presents
summaries of determinations regarding eligibility to apply for trade
adjustment assistance for workers (TA-W) number and alternative trade
adjustment assistance (ATAA) by (TA-W) number issued during the periods
of December 2005.
In order for an affirmative determination to be made and a
certification of eligibility to apply for directly-impacted (primary)
worker adjustment assistance to be issued, each of the group
eligibility requirements of Section 222(a) of the Act must be met.
I. Section (a)(2)(A) all of the following must be satisfied:
A. A significant number or proportion of the workers in such
workers' firm, or an appropriate subdivision of the firm, have become
totally or partially separated, or are threatened to become totally or
partially separated;
B. The sales or production, or both, of such firm or subdivision
have decreased absolutely; and
C. Increased imports of articles like or directly competitive with
articles produced by such firm or subdivision have contributed
importantly to such workers' separation or threat of separation and to
the decline in sales or production of such firm or subdivision; or
II. Section (a)(2)(B) both of the following must be satisfied:
A. A significant number or proportion of the workers in such
workers' firm, or an appropriate subdivision of the firm, have become
totally or partially separated, or are threatened to become totally or
partially separated;
B. There has been a shift in production by such workers' firm or
subdivision to a foreign country of
[[Page 2568]]
articles like or directly competitive with articles which are produced
by such firm or subdivision; and
C. One of the following must be satisfied:
1. The country to which the workers' firm has shifted production of
the articles is a party to a free trade agreement with the United
States;
2. The country to which the workers' firm has shifted production of
the articles to a beneficiary country under the Andean Trade Preference
Act, African Growth and Opportunity Act, or the Caribbean Basin
Economic Recovery Act; or
3. There has been or is likely to be an increase in imports of
articles that are like or directly competitive with articles which are
or were produced by such firm or subdivision.
Also, in order for an affirmative determination to be made and a
certification of eligibility to apply for worker adjustment assistance
as an adversely affected secondary group to be issued, each of the
group eligibility requirements of Section 222(b) of the Act must be
met.
(1) Significant number or proportion of the workers in the workers'
firm or an appropriate subdivision of the firm have become totally or
partially separated, or are threatened to become totally or partially
separated;
(2) The workers' firm (or subdivision) is a supplier or downstream
producer to a firm (or subdivision) that employed a group of workers
who received a certification of eligibility to apply for trade
adjustment assistance benefits and such supply or production is related
to the article that was the basis for such certification; and
(3) either--
(A) the workers' firm is a supplier and the component parts it
supplied for the firm (or subdivision) described in paragraph (2)
accounted for at least 20 percent of the production or sales of the
workers' firm; or
(B) a loss or business by the workers' firm with the firm (or
subdivision) described in paragraph (2) contributed importantly to the
workers' separation or threat of separation.
Affirmative Determinations for Worker Adjustment Assistance
The following certifications have been issued; the date following
the company name and location of each determination references the
impact date for all workers of such determination.
The following certifications have been issued. The requirements of
(a)(2)(A) (increased imports) of Section 222 have been met.
TA-W-58,375; Spartacraft, Inc., Connelly Springs, NC, November 15,
2004.
TA-W-58,386; Shepherd Hardware Products, LLC, Three Oaks, MI, November
16, 2004.
TA-W-58,469; Rockford Corporation, Adecco Services, Walker, MI,
November 29, 2004.
TA-W-58,484; Big River Zinc Corporation, Sauget, IL, December 7, 2004.
TA-W-58,346; Weavetex, Inc., Jonesville, SC, November 14, 2004.
TA-W-58,359; Strongwater Group, LLC (The), Moonachie, NJ, November 16,
2004.
TA-W-58,359A; Strongwater Group, LLC (The), Englewood, NJ, November 16,
2004.
TA-W-58,359B; Strongwater Group, LLC (The), Tetate, CA, November 16,
2004.
TA-W-58,385; Car Component Technologies, A Subsidiary of American
Remanufacturers, Inc., Bedford, NH, November 18, 2004.
TA-W-58,385A; Car Component Technologies, A Subsidiary of American
Remanufacturers, Distribution Center, Merrimack, NH, November 18, 2004.
TA-W-58,425; Carolina Mills, Inc., Corporate Headquarters, Maiden, NC,
November 30, 2004.
The following certifications have been issued. The requirements of
(a)(2)(B) (shift in production) of Section 222 have been met.
TA-W-58,371; Carhartt, Inc., Sebree, KY, November 17, 2004.
TA-W-58,371A; Carhartt, Inc., Morehead, KY, November 17, 2004.
TA-W-58,371B; Carhartt, Inc., Glasgow, KY, November 17, 2004.
TA-W-58,447; May and Scofield, LLC, Madison, SD, December 1, 2004.
TA-W-58,512; Tri-State Hospital Supply Corp., Salisbury, NC, December
16, 2004.
TA-W-58,345; Formica Corporation, Odenton, MD, November 14, 2004.
TA-W-58,363; Thomasville Furniture Ind., Inc., Corporate Office,
Thomasville, NC, March 11, 2005.
TA-W-58,367; Springfield Wire, Inc., Leased Wkrs of Summit Careers,
Spherion Staffing, Valley Employment, Springfield, MA, November 10,
2004.
The following certification has been issued. The requirement of
supplier to a trade certified firm has been met.
TA-W-58,419; Dean Company (The), Princeton, WV, November 29, 2004.
The following certification has been issued. The requirement of
downstream producer to a trade certified firm has been met.
None
Negative Determinations for Worker Adjustment Assistance
In the following cases, the investigation revealed that the
criteria for eligibility have not been met for the reasons specified.
The investigation revealed that criterion (a)(2)(A)(I.A) and
(a)(2)(B)(II.A) (no employment decline) has not been met.
TA-W-58,390; JK Tool, A Subsidiary of Siegel--Robert, Inc.,
Portageville, MO.
The investigation revealed that criteria (a)(2)(A)(I.B.) (Sales or
production, or both, did not decline) and (a)(2)(B)(II.B) (No shift in
production to a foreign country) have not been met.
TA-W-58,435; Paxar Americas, Inc., Systems Div., Adecco, Sayre, PA.
The investigation revealed that criteria (a)(2)(A)(I.C.) (increased
imports) and (a)(2)(B)(II.B) (No shift in production to a foreign
country) have not been met.
TA-W-58,202; Key Plastics, Hamilton, IN.
TA-W-58,485; Rawlings Sporting Goods, A Subsidiary of K2, Inc.,
Licking, MO.
TA-W-58,158; Falcon Plastics, Washington, PA.
TA-W-58,372; Tin, Inc., dba Temple Inland, Inc., Corrugated Packaging
Division, Newark, DE.
The investigation revealed that criteria (a)(2)(A)(I.C.) (Increased
imports and (a)(2)(B)(II.C) (has shifted production to a foreign
country) have not been met.
None
The workers firm does not produce an article as required for
certification under Section 222 of the Trade Act of 1974.
TA-W-58,287; Agilent Technologies, Global Infrastructure Services,
Customer & Quality, Loveland, CO.
TA-W-58,406; Adobe Air, Phoenix, AZ.
TA-W-58,428; Apple Computer, Inc., Continuation Engineering Department,
Cupertino, CA.
The investigation revealed that criteria (2) has not been met. The
workers firm (or subdivision) is not a supplier or downstream producer
to trade-affected companies.
None
Affirmative Determinations for Alternative Trade Adjustment Assistance
In order for the Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance to issue a
[[Page 2569]]
certification of eligibility to apply for Alternative Trade Adjustment
Assistance (ATAA) for older workers, the group eligibility requirements
of Section 246(a)(3)(A)(ii) of the Trade Act must be met.
The following certifications have been issued; the date following
the company name and location of each determination references the
impact date for all workers of such determinations.
In the following cases, it has been determined that the
requirements of Section 246(a)(3)(ii) have been met.
I. Whether a significant number of workers in the workers' firm are
50 years of age or older.
II. Whether the workers in the workers' firm possess skills that
are not easily transferable.
III. The competitive conditions within the workers' industry (i.e.,
conditions within the industry are adverse).
TA-W-58,375; Spartacraft, Inc., Connelly Springs, NC, November 15,
2004.
TA-W-58,386; Shepherd Hardware Products, LLC, Three Oaks, MI, November
16, 2004.
TA-W-58,469; Rockford Corporation, Adecco Services, Walker, MI,
November 29, 2004.
TA-W-58,484; Big River Zinc Corporation, Sauget, IL, December 7, 2004.
TA-W-58,346; Weavetex, Inc., Jonesville, SC, November 14, 2004.
TA-W-58,359; Strongwater Group, LLC (The), Moonachie, NJ, November 16,
2004.
TA-W-58,359A; Strongwater Group, LLC (The), Englewood, NJ, November 16,
2004.
TA-W-58,359B; Strongwater Group, LLC (The), Tetate, CA, November 16,
2004.
TA-W-58,385; Car Component Technologies, A Subsidiary of American
Remanufacturers, Inc., Bedford, NH, November 18, 2004.
TA-W-58,385A; Car Component Technologies, A Subsidiary of American
Remanufacturers, Distribution Center, Merrimack, NH, November 18, 2004.
TA-W-58,425; Carolina Mills, Inc., Corporate Headquarters, Maiden, NC,
November 30, 2004.
TA-W-58,371; Carhartt, Inc., Sebree, KY, November 17, 2004.
TA-W-58,371A; Carhartt, Inc., Morehead, KY, November 17, 2004.
TA-W-58,371B; Carhartt, Inc., Glasgow, KY, November 17, 2004.
TA-W-58,447; May and Scofield, LLC, Madison, SD, December 1, 2004.
TA-W-58,512; Tri-State Hospital Supply Corp., Salisbury, NC, December
16, 2004.
TA-W-58,363; Thomasville Furniture Ind., Inc., Corporate Office,
Thomasville, NC, March 11, 2005.
TA-W-58,367; Springfield Wire, Inc., Leased Wkrs of Summit Careers,
Spherion Staffing, Valley Employment, Springfield, MA, November 10,
2004.
TA-W-58,419; Dean Company (The), Princeton, WV, November 29, 2004.
Negative Determinations for Alternative Trade Adjustment Assistance
In order for the Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance to issue a
certification of eligibility to apply for Alternative Trade Adjustment
Assistance (ATAA) for older workers, the group eligibility requirements
of Section 246(a)(3)(A)(ii) of the Trade Act must be met.
In the following cases, it has been determined that the
requirements of Section 246(a)(3)(ii) have not been met for the reasons
specified.
Since the workers are denied eligibility to apply for TAA, the
workers cannot be certified eligible for ATAA.
TA-W-58,390; JK Tool, A Subsidiary of Siegel--Robert, Inc.,
Portageville, MO.
TA-W-58,435; Paxar Americas, Inc., Systems Div., Adecco, Sayre, PA.
TA-W-58,158; Falcon Plastics, Washington, PA.
TA-W-58,372; Tin, Inc., dba Temple Inland, Inc., Corrugated Packaging
Division, Newark, DE.
TA-W-58,202; Key Plastics, Hamilton, IN.
TA-W-58,485; Rawlings Sporting Goods, A Subsidiary of K2, Inc.,
Licking, MO.
TA-W-58,287; Agilent Technologies, Global Infrastructure Services,
Customer & Quality, Loveland, CO.
TA-W-58,406; Adobe Air, Phoenix, AZ.
TA-W-58,428; Apple Computer, Inc., Continuation Engineering Department,
Cupertino, CA.
The Department as determined that criterion (1) of Section 246 has
not been met. Workers at the firm are 50 years of age or older.
None
The Department as determined that criterion (2) of Section 246 has
not been met. Workers at the firm possess skills that are easily
transferable.
TA-W-58,345; Formica Corporation, Odenton, MD, November 14, 2004.
The Department as determined that criterion (3) of Section 246 has
not been met. Competition conditions within the workers' industry are
not adverse.
None
I hereby certify that the aforementioned determinations were
issued during the month of December 2005. Copies of these
determinations are available for inspection in Room C-5311, U.S.
Department of Labor, 200 Constitution Avenue, NW., Washington, DC
20210 during normal business hours or will be mailed to persons who
write to the above address.
Dated: January 10, 2006.
Erica R. Cantor,
Director, Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance.
[FR Doc. E6-390 Filed 1-13-06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510-30-P
