Filing Under the Public Utility Holding Company Act of 1935, as Amended (“Act”), 1569-1580 [E6-84]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 6 / Tuesday, January 10, 2006 / Notices
No. 10 and it shall be filed pursuant to
Item 77Q3 of Form N–SAR, as such
Statements or Form may be revised,
amended, or superseded from time to
time. In particular, the report shall
address procedures designed to achieve
the following objectives: (a) That the
Interfund Loan Rate will be higher than
the Repo Rate and, if applicable, the
yield of the Money Market Funds, but
lower than the Bank Loan Rate; (b)
compliance with the collateral
requirements as set forth in the
application; (c) compliance with the
percentage limitations on interfund
borrowing and lending; (d) allocation of
interfund borrowing and lending
demand in an equitable manner and in
accordance with procedures established
by the Board(s); and (e) that the interest
rate on any Interfund Loan does not
exceed the interest rate on any third
party borrowings of a borrowing Fund at
the time of the Interfund Loan.
After the final report is filed, the
Fund’s external auditors, in connection
with their Fund audit examinations,
will continue to review the operation of
the credit facility for compliance with
the conditions of the application and
their review will form the basis, in part,
of the auditor’s report on internal
accounting controls in Form N–SAR.
18. No Fund will participate in the
credit facility upon receipt of requisite
regulatory approval unless it has fully
disclosed in its SAI all material facts
about its intended participation.
19. The Board of any Fund will satisfy
the fund governance standards as
defined in rule 0–1(a)(7) under the Act
by the compliance date for the rule.
For the Commission, by the Division of
Investment Management, under delegated
authority.
Nancy M. Morris,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. E6–83 Filed 1–9–06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8010–01–P
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
COMMISSION
[Release No. 35–28079]
Filing Under the Public Utility Holding
Company Act of 1935, as Amended
(‘‘Act’’)
wwhite on PROD1PC65 with NOTICES
December 30, 2005.
Notice is hereby given that the
following filing has been made with the
Commission pursuant to provisions of
the Act and rules promulgated under
the Act. All interested persons are
referred to the application-declaration
for complete statements of the proposed
transactions summarized below. The
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:09 Jan 09, 2006
Jkt 208001
application-declaration and any
amendments are available for public
inspection through the Commission’s
Branch of Public Reference.
Interested persons wishing to
comment or request a hearing on the
application-declaration should submit
their views in writing by January 23,
2006, to the Secretary, Securities and
Exchange Commission, Washington, DC
20549–0609, and serve a copy on
Applicants at the addresses specified
below. Proof of service (by affidavit or,
in the case of an attorney at law, by
certificate) should be filed with the
request. Any request for hearing should
identify specifically the issues of fact or
law that are disputed. A person who so
requests will be notified of any hearing,
if ordered, and will receive a copy of
any notice or order issued in this matter.
After January 23, 2006, the applicationdeclaration, as filed or as amended, may
be granted and/or permitted to become
effective.
Exelon Corporation et al. (70–10294)
Exelon Corporation (‘‘Exelon’’), a
registered holding company; Exelon’s
public utility subsidiaries
Commonwealth Edison (‘‘ComEd’’);
Exelon Generation Company, LLC
(‘‘Exelon Generation’’), 300 Exelon Way,
Kennet Square, PA 19348; PECO Energy
Company (‘‘PECO’’) 2301 Market Street,
Philadelphia, PA; Commonwealth
Edison Company of Indiana, Inc.
(‘‘Indiana Company’’); Exelon’s
nonutility registered holding company
subsidiaries Exelon Energy Delivery
Company, LLC (‘‘Delivery’’) and Exelon
Ventures Company, LLC (‘‘Ventures’’);
and Exelon’s nonutility subsidiaries
(‘‘Nonutility Subsidiaries’’), each
located at 10 South Dearborn Street,
Chicago, Illinois 60603; Public Service
Enterprise Group Incorporated
(‘‘PSEG’’), an exempt public utility
holding company, Public Service
Electric and Gas Company (‘‘PSE&G’’), a
public utility company subsidiary of
PSEG, and its nonutility subsidiaries,
each located at 80 Park Plaza, Newark,
New Jersey 07102 (collectively
‘‘Applicants’’) have filed an applicationdeclaration (‘‘Application’’) with the
Commission under sections 6(a), 7, 9(a),
10, 11, 12, 13(b), 32, 33 and 34 of the
Act and rules 42, 43, 44, 45, 46, 53, and
54 under the Act.1
1 The Applicants are Exelon and its Subsidiaries
and PSEG and its Subsidiaries and such other direct
and indirect subsidiary companies that Exelon may
form or acquire in accordance with a Commission
order or otherwise in accordance with the Act or
a rule promulgated under the Act.
PO 00000
Frm 00064
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
1569
I. Overview of the Merger
On December 20, 2004, Exelon and
PSEG, an electric and gas utility holding
company that claims exemption from
registration pursuant to Rule 2 under
section 3(a)(1) of the Act, entered into
an Agreement and Plan of Merger (the
‘‘Merger Agreement’’). Under the terms
of the Merger Agreement, PSEG would
merge into Exelon (the ‘‘Merger’’). Each
PSEG shareholder would be entitled to
receive 1.225 shares of Exelon common
stock for each PSEG share held and cash
in lieu of any fraction of an Exelon share
that a PSEG shareholder would have
otherwise been entitled to receive.
Exelon common stock would be
unaffected by the Merger, with each
issued and outstanding share remaining
outstanding following the Merger as a
share in the surviving company. Upon
completion of the Merger, Exelon would
change its name to Exelon Electric & Gas
Corporation.
As the surviving company in the
Merger, Exelon would remain the
ultimate corporate parent of PECO and
ComEd and the other Exelon
subsidiaries and become the ultimate
corporate parent of PSE&G and the other
PSEG subsidiaries.
Exelon would continue to be a
registered public utility holding
company under the Act until the six
months after August 8, 2005, the date of
enactment of the Energy Policy Act of
2005, and ComEd, PECO and PSE&G
would continue to be public utility
subsidiary companies. Exelon would
remain headquartered in Chicago but
would also have energy trading and
nuclear headquarters in southeastern
Pennsylvania and generation
headquarters in Newark, New Jersey.
PSE&G would remain headquartered in
Newark. PECO would remain
headquartered in Philadelphia and
ComEd would remain headquartered in
Chicago.
The Merger is subject to a number of
conditions precedent, including receipt
by the parties of required state and
federal regulatory approvals and filing
of pre-merger notification statements
under the Hart-Scott-Rodino Antitrust
Improvements Act of 1976, as amended
(‘‘HSR Act’’), and the expiration or
termination of the statutory waiting
period under that act. Applicants state
that, the boards of directors of Exelon
and PSEG and the shareholders of PSEG
have approved the proposed Merger.
Also, the shareholders of Exelon have
approved the issuance of shares of
common stock by Exelon.
In addition to the changes resulting
from the Merger Agreement, the
Applicants intend to revise their
E:\FR\FM\10JAN1.SGM
10JAN1
1570
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 6 / Tuesday, January 10, 2006 / Notices
wwhite on PROD1PC65 with NOTICES
corporate structure (the ‘‘Exelon
Generation Restructuring’’). Applicants
state that, although their plans are not
yet completely finalized, they currently
propose to implement the following
changes, subject to approval, as
required, by the Commission. After
obtaining necessary approvals and third
party consents, PSEG Power LLC
(‘‘PSEG Power’’) and its direct
subsidiaries PSEG Nuclear LLC (‘‘PSEG
Nuclear’’), PSEG Fossil LLC (‘‘PSEG
Fossil’’) and PSEG Energy Resources &
Trade LLC (‘‘PSEG ER&T’’) would all
cease to exist as separate entities and
would become part of Exelon
Generation. The business functions of
each of these former PSEG entities
would become a part of the respective
Exelon Generation business unit. The
Applicants anticipate retaining the
subsidiaries owned by these PSEG
entities as direct subsidiaries of Exelon
Generation.
Also in connection with the Merger,
PSE&G would become a direct
subsidiary of Delivery.2 The current
subsidiaries of PSE&G would remain
intact. PSEG Holdings would become a
subsidiary of Exelon, as the successor to
PSEG. The current subsidiaries of PSEG
Holdings would remain intact. PSEG
Service Corporation (‘‘PSEG Services’’)
would sell all of its assets to Exelon
Businesses Services Company (‘‘Exelon
BSC’’), change its name, and remain as
a non-energy subsidiary. Exelon BSC
would be the sole ‘‘service company’’ of
Exelon.
Applicants’ Mitigation Plan was
approved by the Federal Energy
Regulatory Commission (‘‘FERC’’) in its
‘‘Order Authorizing Merger under
section 203 of the Federal Power Act’’
issued July 1, 2005 (‘‘Merger Order’’)
based on, among other things,
acceptance of a proposal to divest,
through the sale of plant or through the
sale of long-term firm energy rights,
6,600 MW of generation capacity
(‘‘Mitigation Plan’’) to mitigate any
generation market concentration
concerns resulting from the Merger. The
Mitigation Plan, according to
Applicants, calls for the divestiture by
sale of 4000 MW of generation
capacity.3 The sale would occur within
twelve (12) months following close of
the Merger. Applicants request
Commission approval for the
disposition of this generating capacity
because, as a result of the Exelon
2 This would be accomplished through a
contribution of the common stock of PSE&G held
by Exelon contemporaneously with the Merger to
Delivery or other appropriate corporate transaction.
3 As explained more fully below, on July 1, 2005,
FERC accepted a Mitigation Plan including the
Generation Divestiture.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:09 Jan 09, 2006
Jkt 208001
Generation Restructuring, the subject
generation capacity would be owned by
Exelon Generation, a public utility
company under the Act. The disposition
of generation capacity owned by Exelon
Generation, as finally approved by FERC
pursuant to post-Merger compliance
filings required to be made by Exelon
under the FERC Merger Order (the
‘‘Post-Merger FERC Compliance
Filings’’), is referred to as the
Generation Divestiture.
In connection with consummation of
the Generation Divestiture, subsequent
to the Exelon Generation Restructuring,
the Applicants state they would make
further revisions to their corporate
structure (the ‘‘Divestiture Generation
Restructurings’’) in respect of the
particular electric generating units, or
interests, being sold. The Post-Merger
FERC Compliance Filings would
address the particular facts of the
Divestiture Generating Restructurings.
The Exelon Generation Restructuring,
the Divestiture Generation Restructuring
and the Generation Divestiture are
collectively called the ‘‘Generation
Transactions.’’
In addition to authorization of the
Merger, the Exelon Generation
Restructuring, the Divestiture
Generation Restructuring, and the
Generation Divestiture, Applicants
request certain related approvals,
including:
1. Authorizations related to service
company and other affiliate
transactions;
2. Issuance by Exelon of common
stock in connection with the Merger and
employee and director compensation
plans as described below;
3. Authorization of the consolidation
(or replacement in lieu of consolidation)
of existing indebtedness and obligations
of PSEG and its subsidiaries as
obligations of Exelon or its subsidiaries
as a result of the Merger;
4. Modifications to Exelon’s existing
omnibus financing authority Holding
Company Act Release No. 27830 (April
1, 2004) (the ‘‘2004 Financing Order’’);
and
5. Approval of a section 11(e) plan in
respect of the Generation Transactions
and related approvals as necessary or
appropriate in respect of the tax
treatment afforded by section 1081 of
the Internal Revenue Code.
II. Description of Exelon and Its
Subsidiaries
A. Exelon
Exelon was incorporated in
Pennsylvania in February 1999. On
October 20, 2000, Exelon became the
ultimate parent corporation for PECO
PO 00000
Frm 00065
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
and ComEd, and registered pursuant to
section 5 of the Act.
Exelon, through its subsidiaries,
operates in two business segments—
Delivery and Generation—as described
below. In addition to Exelon’s two
business segments, Exelon BSC, a
subsidiary of Exelon, provides Exelon
and its subsidiaries with financial,
human resources, legal, information
technology, supply management and
corporate governance services, as well
as direction and management of shared
functions for Delivery.
Delivery. Exelon’s energy delivery
business consists of the purchase and
sale of electricity and distribution and
transmission services by ComEd in
northern Illinois and by PECO in
southeastern Pennsylvania and the
purchase and sale of natural gas and
distribution services by PECO in the
Pennsylvania counties surrounding the
City of Philadelphia.
Generation. Exelon’s generation
business consists of electric generating
facilities and energy marketing
operations of Exelon Generation, a
49.5% interest in two power stations in
Mexico, and the competitive retail sales
business of Exelon Energy Company.
B. The Exelon Utility Subsidiaries
Exelon indirectly owns all of the
issued and outstanding membership
interests of Exelon Generation, all the
issued and outstanding common stock
of PECO and substantially all of the
issued and outstanding common stock
of ComEd,4 and ComEd owns all the
issued and outstanding common stock
of Commonwealth Edison Company of
Indiana, Inc. (the ‘‘Indiana Company’’)
(together, the ‘‘Exelon Utility
Subsidiaries’’).
PECO is engaged principally in the
purchase, transmission, distribution and
sale of electricity to residential,
commercial and industrial customers in
southeastern Pennsylvania and in the
purchase, distribution and sale of
natural gas to residential, commercial
and industrial customers in the
Pennsylvania counties surrounding the
City of Philadelphia. PECO is subject to
regulation by the Pennsylvania Public
Utility Commission (‘‘PAPUC’’) as to
electric and gas rates, the issuances of
certain securities and certain other
aspects of PECO’s operations. PECO is
4 In connection with the conversion of warrants
and convertible preferred stock that were
outstanding prior to the 2000 merger of Unicom
Corporation with PECO Energy Corp., a small
number of shares of common stock of ComEd (about
0.1% of the total outstanding) are not owned by
Exelon but are held by third parties. See Exelon
Corporation, Holding Co. Act Release No. 27256,
note 4 (Oct. 19, 2000) (the ‘‘2000 Merger Order’’).
E:\FR\FM\10JAN1.SGM
10JAN1
wwhite on PROD1PC65 with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 6 / Tuesday, January 10, 2006 / Notices
also subject to regulation by FERC as to
transmission rates, gas pipelines and
certain other aspects of its business.
PECO’s retail service territory covers
approximately 2,100 square miles in
southeastern Pennsylvania. PECO
provides electric delivery service in an
area of approximately 2,000 square
miles, with a population of
approximately 3.8 million, including 1.5
million in the City of Philadelphia.
Natural gas service is supplied in an
approximately 1,900 square mile area in
southeastern Pennsylvania adjacent to
Philadelphia, with a population of
approximately 2.3 million. PECO
delivers electricity to approximately 1.5
million customers and natural gas to
approximately 460,000 customers.
ComEd is engaged principally in the
purchase, transmission, distribution and
sale of electricity to a diverse base of
residential, commercial, industrial and
wholesale customers in northern
Illinois. ComEd is subject to regulation
by the Illinois Commerce Commission
(‘‘ICC’’) as to rates, the issuance of
certain securities, and certain other
aspects of ComEd’s operations. ComEd
is also subject to regulation by the FERC
as to transmission rates and certain
other aspects of its business.
ComEd’s retail service territory has an
area of approximately 11,300 square
miles and an estimated population of
eight million. The service territory
includes the City of Chicago, an area of
about 225 square miles with an
estimated population of three million.
ComEd has approximately 3.7 million
customers.
Electric utility restructuring
legislation was adopted in Pennsylvania
in December 1996 and in Illinois in
December 1997. Both Illinois and
Pennsylvania permit competition by
alternative generation suppliers for
retail generation supply while
transmission and distribution services
remain fully regulated. Both states,
through their regulatory agencies,
established a phased approach for
allowing customers to choose an
alternative electric generation supplier,
required rate reductions and imposed
caps on rates during a transition period,
and allowed the collection of
competitive transition charges from
customers to recover costs that might
not otherwise be recovered in a
competitive market.
Effective as of January 1, 2001, Exelon
effected a restructuring that involved
the transfer of the electric generating
assets of ComEd and PECO to Exelon
Generation, a Pennsylvania limited
liability company and a public utility
company engaged in the generation, sale
and purchase of electricity in
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:09 Jan 09, 2006
Jkt 208001
Pennsylvania, Illinois and elsewhere
and also engaged in the trading of other
energy and energy-related commodities
and development and ownership of
exempt wholesale generators (‘‘EWGs’’).
PJM Interconnection, L.L.C. (‘‘PJM’’)
is the independent system operator and
the FERC-approved Regional
Transmission Organization (‘‘RTO’’) for
the Mid-Atlantic and a portion of the
Midwest. PJM is the transmission
provider under, and the administrator
of, the PJM Open Access Transmission
Tariff, operates the PJM Interchange
Energy Market and Capacity Credit
Markets, and conducts the day-to-day
operations of the bulk power system of
the PJM region. ComEd’s and PECO’s
transmission systems are currently
under the control of PJM and, by order
dated October 28, 2004 (Holding Co. Act
Release No. 27904) (the ‘‘PJM Order’’),
the Commission found that the electric
utility properties of the Exelon system
satisfy the interconnection requirement
of section 2(a)(29)(A) of the Act by
reason of PJM’s operational control of
the transmission assets of ComEd and
PECO.5
Both ComEd and PECO are public
utility companies. ComEd is also a
holding company exempt from
registration pursuant to section 3(a)(1)
of the Act, by reason of its ownership
of the Indiana Company. Delivery is an
intermediate registered holding
company and a first-tier subsidiary of
Exelon. Delivery owns all of the issued
and outstanding common stock of PECO
and substantially all of the issued and
outstanding common stock of ComEd.
Exelon Generation is also an electric
utility company. Exelon Generation is a
wholly owned subsidiary of Ventures,
which is an intermediate registered
holding company and a first tier
subsidiary of Exelon. Ventures and
Delivery are referred to as the ‘‘Other
Registered Holding Companies.’’ None
of the Other Registered Holding
Companies has securities outstanding in
the hands of the public.
C. Direct Non-Utility Subsidiaries of
Exelon
Exelon has direct wholly owned nonutility subsidiaries as follows:
Exelon BSC, a service company,
provides administrative, management
and technical services to Exelon and its
associate companies;
5 In the 2000 Merger Order the Commission found
that the electric utility operations of Exelon
constituted a single, integrated electric utility
system, and that the gas utility operations of Exelon
constituted a single, integrated gas utility system
that was a permissible ‘‘additional’’ system under
the standards of section 2(a)(11) of the Act.
PO 00000
Frm 00066
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
1571
Exelon Investment Holdings, LLC, an
Illinois limited liability company, is a
holding company for tax-advantaged
housing transactions;
UII, LLC, an Illinois limited liability
company, is engaged in a like-kind
exchange transaction pursuant to which
a portion of the proceeds from the sale
of ComEd’s fossil generating stations
was invested in passive generating
station leases with entities unrelated to
Exelon. The generating stations were
leased back to such entities as part of
the transaction.6
Exelon has the following additional
direct subsidiaries: Unicom Assurance
Company, Ltd., an inactive captive
insurance company, Exelon Capital
Trust I, an inactive finance company,
Exelon Capital Trust II, an inactive
finance company and Exelon Capital
Trust III, an inactive finance company.
D. Capitalization of Exelon
The total authorized shares of capital
stock of Exelon consist of (i)
1,200,000,000 shares of common stock,
no par value and (ii) 100,000,000 shares
of preferred stock, no par value. At the
close of business on December 31, 2004,
664,187,996 shares of Exelon common
stock were outstanding, and no shares of
Exelon preferred stock were issued and
outstanding. In addition, at that date (i)
2,499,865 shares of common stock were
held by Exelon in its treasury, (ii)
25,205,285 shares of common stock
were reserved for issuance pursuant to
outstanding options to purchase
common stock granted under Exelon’s
Long-Term Incentive Plan, Exelon’s
Amended and Restated Long-Term
Incentive Plan, as amended, and
Exelon’s 1998 Stock Option Plan
(together with Exelon’s Directors’ Stock
Unit Plan, the ‘‘Exelon Stock Incentive
Plans’’), (iii) 14,777,078 shares of
common stock were reserved for the
grant of additional awards under the
Exelon Stock Incentive Plans, (iv)
7,000,000 shares of common stock were
reserved for issuance pursuant to the
Dividend Reinvestment and Stock
Purchase Plan, (v) 624,495 shares of
common stock were reserved for
issuance pursuant to outstanding
performance shares, (vi) 216,000 shares
of common stock were reserved for
issuance pursuant to outstanding units
under Exelon’s Directors’ Stock Unit
Plan, (vii) 5,357,745 shares of common
stock were reserved for issuance under
Exelon’s Employee Stock Purchase Plan,
(viii) 1,060,053 shares of common stock
were reserved for issuance pursuant to
6 Unicom Investment, Inc., an Illinois
corporation, was reorganized as an Illinois limited
liability company, UII, LLC on November 10, 2004.
E:\FR\FM\10JAN1.SGM
10JAN1
1572
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 6 / Tuesday, January 10, 2006 / Notices
outstanding restricted shares (shares of
common stock subject to forfeiture) and
(ix) 1,336,516 shares of common stock
were reserved for issuance pursuant to
outstanding deferred shares (shares of
common stock the issuance of which
has been deferred pursuant to Exelon’s
Deferred Compensation Plan).
As of December 31, 2004, Exelon’s
capitalization on a consolidated basis
was as follows: Common Equity
(includes Retained Earnings) 40.79%;
Minority Interest 0.18%; Preferred and
Preference Stock 2.74%; Securitization
Obligations 20.76%; Long-Term Debt
31.56%; Current Maturities of LongTerm Debt 1.85%; Total Long-Term
Debt 33.41%; Short-Term Debt 2.12%.
III. Description of PSEG and Its
Subsidiaries
wwhite on PROD1PC65 with NOTICES
A. PSEG
PSEG was incorporated under the
laws of the State of New Jersey in 1985
and is a section 3(a)(1) exempt public
utility holding company. PSEG, through
its subsidiaries, operates in three
business segments—Delivery,
Generation and Enterprises, as
described below. In addition to PSEG’s
three business segments, PSEG Services,
a subsidiary of PSEG, provides PSEG
and its subsidiaries with financial,
human resources, legal, information
technology, supply management and
corporate governance services.
Delivery—PSEG’s domestic energy
delivery business consists of the
transmission and distribution of electric
energy and gas in New Jersey through
PSE&G.
Generation—PSEG’s generation
businesses consist of the owned and
contracted for electric generation
facilities and energy marketing
operations of the PSEG Power
subsidiaries and the PSEG Global LLC
(‘‘PSEG Global’’) subsidiaries. PSEG
Power has three principal direct wholly
owned subsidiaries: PSEG Nuclear,
PSEG Fossil and PSEG ER&T. The PSEG
Power generation portfolio consists of
approximately 14,607 MW of generation
in the Northeast and Midwest. PSEG
Global has equity ownership interests in
approximately 2,404 MW of generation
in North America. All the generation
assets in the PSEG system are held by
PSEG subsidiaries with EWG or foreign
utility company (‘‘FUCO’’) status under
the Act or qualifying facility (‘‘QF’’)
status under the Public Utility
Regulatory Policies Act of 1978, as
amended (‘‘PURPA’’).
Enterprises—PSEG’s enterprise
businesses consist primarily of (1)
investments in energy-related financial
transactions, leveraged leases, operating
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:09 Jan 09, 2006
Jkt 208001
leases, leveraged buyout funds,
marketable securities and a demandside management business and (2)
investments in international generation
and delivery businesses qualified as
EWGs and foreign utility companies
through PSEG Resources LLC (‘‘PSEG
Resources’’) and through PSEG Global.
B. The PSEG Utility Subsidiary
PSE&G is a public utility company
subsidiary of PSEG. PSE&G is an electric
and gas utility company engaged
principally in the transmission and
distribution of electric energy and gas in
New Jersey. PSE&G is subject to
extensive regulation by the New Jersey
Board of Public Utilities (‘‘NJBPU’’) as
to electric and gas rates, the issuance of
securities and certain other aspects of
PSE&G’s operations. PSE&G is also
subject to regulation by the FERC as to
electric transmission rates and certain
other aspects of its business.
PSE&G’s retail service territory covers
a corridor of approximately 2,600 square
miles running diagonally across New
Jersey from Bergen County in the
northeast to an area below the city of
Camden in the southwest with a
population of approximately 5.5
million. PSE&G provides service to
approximately 2.0 million electric
customers and approximately 1.6
million gas customers.
PSE&G does not own or operate any
electric generation facilities. PSE&G, as
a result of an order of the NJBPU issued
under the provisions of the New Jersey
Electric Discount and Energy
Competition Act (‘‘EDECA’’), transferred
all of its electric generation facilities,
plant, equipment and wholesale power
trading contracts to its affiliate PSEG
ER&T in August 2000. Also, under an
NJBPU order, PSE&G transferred its gas
supply business, including its
inventories and supply contracts, to
PSEG ER&T in May 2002. PSE&G
continues to own and operate its electric
transmission and electric and gas
distribution business. PSE&G has
transferred functional control over its
electric transmission facilities to PJM.
All electric and gas customers in New
Jersey have the ability to choose an
electric energy and/or gas supplier. For
those retail electric customers located in
New Jersey who do not choose a
competitive electric supplier, New
Jersey’s Electric Distribution Companies
(‘‘EDCs’’), including PSE&G, provide
basic generation service (‘‘BGS’’) or
provider of last resort service (‘‘POLR’’).
The EDCs satisfy their BGS obligations
through a competitive state-wide annual
auction. PSE&G’s affiliate PSEG ER&T,
has historically been a successful
PO 00000
Frm 00067
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
participant in these auctions and serves
several EDCs including PSE&G.
For those retail gas customers located
in New Jersey who do not choose a
competitive natural gas supplier, New
Jersey’s gas distribution companies,
including PSE&G, provide basic gas
supply service (‘‘BGSS’’) or POLR.
PSE&G has entered into a full
requirements contract through 2007
with PSEG ER&T to meet the supply
requirements of PSE&G’s gas
customers.7 PSEG ER&T charges PSE&G
for the gas commodity costs, which
PSE&G recovers from its customers. Any
difference between rates charged by
PSEG ER&T under the BGSS contract
and rates charged to PSE&G’s customers
are deferred and collected or refunded
through future adjustments in retail
rates.
PSE&G’s natural gas facilities consist
entirely of local gas distribution
facilities in the State of New Jersey and
neither PSE&G nor any other PSEG
company owns any interstate natural
gas facilities subject to the Natural Gas
Act.
C. Direct Non-Utility Subsidiaries of
PSEG
PSEG has three direct wholly owned
non-utility subsidiaries, PSEG Power,
PSEG Holdings and PSEG Services.
PSEG Power has three principal direct
wholly owned subsidiaries: PSEG
Nuclear, which owns and operates
nuclear generating stations; PSEG
Fossil, which develops, owns and
operates domestic fossil generating
stations and other non-nuclear
generating stations; and PSEG ER&T,
which markets the capacity and
production of PSEG Fossil’s and PSEG
Nuclear’s stations, manages the
commodity price risks and market risks
related to generation and markets
electricity, capacity, ancillary services
and natural gas products on a wholesale
basis. PSEG Power also provides
specialized maintenance, repair and
plant engineering services on energyrelated electro-mechanical equipment to
its affiliates. PSEG Nuclear and PSEG
Fossil are both EWGs.
PSEG ER&T conducts energy trading
operations and does not own any utility
assets. PSEG ER&T is subject to
regulation by FERC as to its wholesale
electric sales and certain other aspects
of its business. As explained below, it
is contemplated that PSEG ER&T will be
merged into Exelon Generation.
PSEG Holdings has two principal
subsidiaries: PSEG Resources, which
7 The BGSS contract continues year to year
thereafter unless terminated by either party
consistent with its terms.
E:\FR\FM\10JAN1.SGM
10JAN1
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 6 / Tuesday, January 10, 2006 / Notices
invests primarily in energy-related,
financial transactions, and PSEG Global,
which invests in international
generation and delivery businesses
qualified as EWGs and FUCOs and
domestic generation qualified as EWGs
and QFs.8
PSEG Resources has investments in
energy-related financial transactions
and assets including leveraged leases,
operating leases, leveraged buyout
funds, limited partnerships and
marketable securities. PSEG Resources
also engages in demand side
management services in New Jersey
through its subsidiaries.
PSEG Global, through various
subsidiaries qualified as FUCOs and
EWGs, has investments in electric
generation, transmission and
distribution facilities in selected
international markets and through
various subsidiaries qualified as EWGS
and QFs, has investments in electric
generation in selected domestic markets.
PSEG Global’s domestic generation
assets are located in California,
Pennsylvania, Texas, New Hampshire
and Hawaii.
PSEG Services is a non-utility service
company. As explained below, it is
contemplated that PSEG Services will
sell all of its assets to Exelon BSC,
change its name, and remain as a
subsidiary.
As of December 31, 2004, PSEG’s
consolidated capitalization was as
follows: Common Equity (includes
Retained Earnings) 29.03%; Preferred
and Preference Stock 6.48%;
Securitization Obligations 10.55%;
Long-Term Debt 49.50%; Current
Maturities of Long-Term Debt 1.21%;
Total Long-Term Debt 50.71%; ShortTerm Debt 3.23%.
wwhite on PROD1PC65 with NOTICES
IV. Principal Terms of the Merger
Agreement
A. Generally
The Merger Agreement provides for a
business combination whereby PSEG
will be merged with and into Exelon,
with Exelon surviving. At the effective
time of and as a result of the Merger, (i)
each outstanding share of PSEG
common stock will be converted into
the right to receive 1.225 shares of
Exelon common stock (the ‘‘Exchange
Ratio’’) and (ii) each share of Exelon
common stock will remain outstanding.
All outstanding PSEG stock options will
be converted into options to purchase
the number of shares of Exelon common
8 Neither PSEG Holdings nor any of its
subsidiaries is a public utility company for
purposes of the 1935 Act. PSEG Holdings and its
subsidiaries are more fully described in Exhibit G–
7 attached to the Application.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:09 Jan 09, 2006
Jkt 208001
stock determined by multiplying (a) the
number of shares of PSEG common
stock subject to such stock option
immediately prior to the effective time
by (b) the Exchange Ratio, at an exercise
price per share of Exelon common stock
equal to the exercise price per share of
PSEG common stock under such stock
option immediately prior to the effective
time divided by the Exchange Ratio.
Following the effective time of the
Merger, the surviving corporation,
which will be renamed Exelon Electric
& Gas Corporation, will have an
eighteen-member board of directors,
which will include twelve Exelon
directors and six new members
nominated by PSEG.
Applicants state that Exelon and
PSEG have made customary
representations, warranties and
covenants in the Merger Agreement,
including, among others, covenants (i)
by PSEG not to (a) solicit proposals
relating to alternative business
combination transactions or (b) subject
to certain exceptions, enter into
discussions concerning alternative
business combination transactions, (ii)
by Exelon and PSEG to cause
shareholder meetings to be held to
consider approval of the Merger and
related transactions, (iii) subject to
PSEG’s right to terminate the Merger
Agreement to accept a superior proposal
(as described in the Merger Agreement),
for the board of directors of PSEG to
recommend adoption and approval by
PSEG’s shareholders of the Merger
Agreement and related transactions and
(iv) for the board of directors of Exelon
to recommend approval by Exelon’s
shareholders of the issuance of shares of
Exelon contemplated by the Merger
Agreement subject to Exelon’s board of
directors’ right to change its
recommendation as required by its
fiduciary duties.
Consummation of the Merger is
subject to various conditions, including
the requisite approval by the
shareholders of Exelon and PSEG,
respectively, no legal impediment to the
Merger, the receipt of required
regulatory approvals, the absence of a
material adverse effect on Exelon, PSEG
or, prospectively, the surviving
corporation and the absence of certain
specified burdensome actions as a
condition to the regulatory approvals for
the Merger. The Merger Agreement
contains certain termination rights for
both Exelon and PSEG, and further
provides that, upon termination of the
Merger Agreement, a termination fee
may be payable under specified
circumstances including (i) if Exelon
enters into a definitive agreement to be
acquired, it must pay PSEG a
PO 00000
Frm 00068
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
1573
termination fee of $400 million plus
PSEG’s transaction expenses up to $40
million, (ii) if Exelon’s board of
directors changes its recommendation, it
must pay PSEG’s transactions expenses
up to $40 million and (iii) if PSEG’s
board of directors changes its
recommendation or if PSEG enters into
a definitive agreement for a superior
proposal to be acquired it must pay
Exelon a termination fee of $400 million
plus Exelon’s transaction expenses up to
$40 million.
B. Accounting Treatment for the Merger
Applicants state that the Merger
would be accounted for under the
purchase method of accounting, the
assets and liabilities of PSEG would be
recorded, as of completion of the
Merger, at their respective fair values
and added to those of Exelon. The
reported financial condition and results
of operations of Exelon issued after
completion of the Merger would reflect
PSEG’s balances and results after
completion of the Merger, but would not
be restated retroactively to reflect the
historical financial position or results of
operations of PSEG. Following
completion of the Merger, the earnings
of the combined company would reflect
purchase accounting adjustments,
including changes to amortization and
depreciation expense for acquired
assets.
C. Operation of the Combined System
Post-Merger
Following the Merger, ComEd, PECO
and PSE&G (the ‘‘Retail Utility
Subsidiaries’’) would all be subsidiaries
of Delivery and would operate their
respective electric distribution systems,
and PECO and PSE&G would operate
their respective gas distribution
systems. The electric transmission
systems of the Retail Utility Subsidiaries
together with the Indiana Company
would be interconnected through and
subject to the functional control of a
single operator, PJM. The Retail Utility
Subsidiaries, the Indiana Company and
Exelon Generation are referred to as the
‘‘Utility Subsidiaries.’’
Applicants assert that the
combination of the electric utility
operations of the Utility Subsidiaries
would result in a single, integrated
electric utility system. In addition, the
combination of PSE&G’s gas utility
properties with those of PECO would
comprise a single integrated gas utility
system that may be retained by Exelon
as an additional system under the
standards of section 11. Applicants note
that in the alternative, the Commission
could find that each of the PECO and
PSE&G gas systems is a separate
E:\FR\FM\10JAN1.SGM
10JAN1
1574
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 6 / Tuesday, January 10, 2006 / Notices
integrated public utility system and that
the PSE&G gas system is a retainable
additional system under the standards
of section 11.
V. Exelon Generation Restructuring
After obtaining necessary approvals
and third party consents, Applicants
state that PSEG Power and PSEG Fossil
would cease to exist as separate entities
and would become part of Exelon
Generation. Applicants state that the
Generation Transactions are predicated
on the assumption that the Exelon
Generation Restructuring would precede
the Divestiture Generation Restructuring
and the Generation Divestiture.
After obtaining any appropriate thirdparty consents, including consents of
certain PSEG Power debt holders to
certain amendments of PSEG Power
debt agreements, the Applicants would
undertake the Exelon Generation
Restructuring such that PSEG Power
and its direct subsidiaries PSEG
Nuclear, PSEG Fossil and PSEG ER&T
would all cease to exist as separate
entities and would become part of
Exelon Generation. The business
functions of these former PSEG entities
would become a part of their respective
Exelon Generation business unit. The
subsidiaries owned by these PSEG
entities would be retained as direct
subsidiaries of Exelon Generation,
which would continue to be an electric
utility company. It is contemplated that
the Exelon Generation Restructuring
would take place contemporaneously
with the closing of the Merger.9
Applicants seek approval for the Exelon
Generation Restructuring.10
wwhite on PROD1PC65 with NOTICES
VI. Exelon Generation Divestiture
The Merger would increase the total
capacity of generation resources owned
or controlled by Exelon. To ensure that
the combined company does not have
9 Applicants anticipate that the current
subsidiaries of PSEG Fossil that own and/or operate
electric generation facilities would remain
subsidiaries of Exelon Generation as EWGs. The
Exelon Generation Restructuring would not result
in any new ‘‘public utility’’ subsidiary of Exelon
Generation.
10 Applicants state that FERC has granted
approvals related to the Exelon Generation
Restructuring. The Applicants state that the New
Jersey Department of Environmental Protection
(‘‘NJDEP’’) has determined that the Industrial Site
Recovery Act (‘‘ISRA’’) does not apply to the Merger
and its related corporate reorganizations including
the Generation Restructuring. Filings have also been
made with the Connecticut Siting Council (the
‘‘Siting Counsel’’) and the Connecticut Department
of Environmental Protection (‘‘CDEP’’) with respect
to the implications of the Merger and the
Generation Restructuring to the generating stations
located in Connecticut and owned by a subsidiary
of PSEG Fossil. The Siting Counsel has approved
the Merger and CDEP approval will be sought closer
to the expected time of the Merger (CDEP approvals
are valid only for ninety days).
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:45 Jan 09, 2006
Jkt 208001
market power in any relevant market,
the Applicants state that Exelon and
PSEG have proposed the Mitigation Plan
designed to address in full FERC’s
requirements for competitive markets.
As part of the plan, the companies have
proposed the Generation Divestiture—to
divest a number of coal, mid-merit, and
peaking generating plants. The
Mitigation Plan also provides for the
transfer of control of the output of a
portion of their baseload nuclear
generating capacity.
Applicants state that Exelon
Generation owns or controls all of the
Exelon system’s generating assets
including the electric generating units
that are subject to divestiture as part of
the Generation Divestiture. Applicants
propose to effect the Generation
Divestiture pursuant to a voluntary plan
under section 11(e) of the Act.
PSEG Fossil is an EWG and is a
wholly-owned subsidiary of PSEG
Power. PSEG Fossil owns directly the
electric generating units that are subject
to being divested as part of the
Generation Divestiture.
The final divestiture proposal made
by Applicants and approved by FERC in
the Merger Order would result in
Applicants divesting 6,600 MW of
capacity. Of this, 4,000 MW would be
physically divested fossil generation.
Under the Merger Order, Applicants are
required to make a compliance filing at
FERC within 30 days of the completion
of their physical divestiture, providing
an analysis of the Merger’s effect on
competition in energy and capacity
markets, given actual plants and assets
divested and the actual acquirers of the
divested assets. If the analysis shows
that the Merger’s harm to competition
has not been sufficiently mitigated,
Applicants must propose additional
mitigation at that time. The divestiture
of the 4,000 MW contemplated in the
Merger Order plus any subsequent
physical divestiture ordered by FERC as
necessary additional mitigation is
referred to as the Generation Divestiture.
Rather than divest their nuclear
baseload units, Applicants have
proposed, and FERC has accepted, a
‘‘virtual divestiture’’ whereby they
would divest, through sales of long-term
firm energy rights, 2,600 MW of nuclear
generating capacity in PJM East.
According to the Applicants, such
‘‘virtual divestiture’’ would take the
form of FERC jurisdictional wholesale
power transactions, would not
constitute the disposition of ‘‘utility
assets’’ within the meaning of the Act,
and therefore, no approval by the
Commission would be required for the
virtual divestiture.
PO 00000
Frm 00069
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Exhibit G–4 to the Application is a
listing of generation facilities subject to
divestiture as initially proposed by
Exelon and PSEG (1,000 MW of peaking
capacity and a total of 1,900 MW of
mid-merit capacity of which 550 MW
would be coal-fired). Subsequent to
filing the Application, the proposed
Generation Divestiture was expanded by
an additional 1,100 MW for the total
divestiture as approved in the Merger
Order of 6,600 MW as noted above and
certain other generation facilities were
added to the list subject to divestiture.
See Exhibit G–4.1 for the final list of the
facilities that may be subject to the
Generation Divestiture.
The Merger Order requires Applicants
to execute sales agreements and make
appropriate filings at FERC within
twelve (12) months of the Closing of the
Merger in order to implement the
Generation Divestiture. The Applicants
state that they intend to commence the
divestiture process more quickly, but
that 12 months may be necessary to
conduct a sales process, negotiate all
necessary agreements and file for all
necessary regulatory approvals.
Applicants state that FERC approved
the Merger based upon, among other
things, the Mitigation Plan. Applicants
request that the Commission make the
necessary findings to support relief
pursuant to section 1081 of the Internal
Revenue Code with respect to the
Generation Transactions. The
Applicants state that none of the
proposed mitigation, including the
Generation Divestiture, would adversely
affect the integration of the combined
electric utility operations for purposes
of the Act.
VII. Divestiture Generation
Restructuring
In order to maximize the amount a
buyer would be willing to pay for the
Subject Assets, defined below, the
Applicants state that they are
considering alternative options for
effecting the disposition by sale of the
electric generating assets listed in
Exhibit G–10 to the Application (the
‘‘Subject Assets’’), as required by the
Generation Divestiture. Subsequent to
the Merger but prior to the
implementation of any of the options set
forth below, the Applicants state that
Exelon would cause the assets listed in
Exhibit G–11 to the Application to be
transferred to Exelon Generation
(‘‘Consolidating Transfers’’). Pursuant to
Option 2 described below, an internal
restructuring would occur immediately
prior to the disposition of the Subject
Assets to the buyer that would change
the ownership structure of the Subject
Assets. The particular tax characteristics
E:\FR\FM\10JAN1.SGM
10JAN1
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 6 / Tuesday, January 10, 2006 / Notices
wwhite on PROD1PC65 with NOTICES
of the sale of a generating unit,
including the buyer’s desired business
and tax structures, would determine
which option would be utilized.
Because there are likely to be multiple
buyers of the Subject Assets (each buyer
a ‘‘Third Party’’), the Applicants may
utilize either of the disposition options
described below to effectuate the sale of
the Subject Assets to each Third Party
(the disposition to each Third Party is
referred to as a ‘‘Divestiture
Transaction’’). Each of the Subject
Assets would be acquired pursuant to
each Divestiture Transaction in
exchange for cash and/or notes (the
‘‘Transfer Consideration’’).
Option 1: Exelon Generation would
sell each of the assets listed in Exhibit
G–13 of the Application to a Third Party
pursuant to the Divestiture Transaction
in exchange for the Transfer
Consideration. Exelon Generation may
distribute to Exelon, through Ventures,
the Transfer Consideration received.
Option 2: Exelon Generation would
sell, in exchange for an amount of cash
equal to the Transfer Consideration each
of the assets listed in Exhibit G–14 to
the Application to the corporation
wholly-owned by Ventures that is listed
as the ‘‘Acquiring Sub’’ next to that
asset in Exhibit G–14. Exelon
Generation may distribute to Exelon (via
Ventures) the cash received. Ventures
would then sell all of the interests in the
Acquiring Sub to the Third Party in
exchange for the Transfer Consideration.
The particulars of the option selected
for each Divestiture Transaction would
be specified in the applicable PostMerger FERC Compliance Filing.
Applicants state that each of the steps
outlined in Option 2 could occur
simultaneously.
VIII. Section 1081 Recitals
Applicants state that Internal Revenue
Code section 1081(d) provides for the
nonrecognition of gain or loss from
certain intercompany transactions
between members of the same system
group if such transactions are made in
obedience to a Commission order.
Applicants request that the order on
this Application: (i) Recite that the sale
or disposition of generating units as part
of the Generation Transactions is
necessary or appropriate to the
integration or simplification of the postMerger Exelon holding company system
and to effectuate the provisions of
section 11(b); and (ii) require postMerger Exelon to take appropriate
actions to cause its direct and indirect
subsidiaries, as the case may be, to
complete the Generation Divestiture as
required in order to comply with the
Merger Order.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:09 Jan 09, 2006
Jkt 208001
IX. Affiliate Transactions
A. Service Company Transactions
Applicants state that, under the 2000
Merger Order, the Commission
authorized Exelon to organize and
capitalize Exelon BSC as a service
company subsidiary, and authorized
Exelon BSC to provide ComEd, PECO
and other companies in the Exelon
system with administrative,
management, engineering, construction,
environmental, and other support
services pursuant to a General Services
Agreement.
Further, Exelon filed a post-effective
amendment in File No. 70–9645
describing its accounting systems and
cost allocation methodologies and
request a supplemental order of the
Commission, as required by the 2000
Merger Order. On October 31, 2003,
Exelon submitted a 60-day letter that, as
supplemented, described certain
proposed changes in allocation methods
for ‘‘corporate governance costs,’’ and
the reorganization of Energy Delivery
Shared Services, a business unit of
Exelon BSC that would begin to provide
new services to ComEd and PECO
effective January 1, 2004.11
In connection with the Merger, the
Applicants state that PSEG Services
would sell all of its assets to Exelon
BSC, change its name and remain as a
subsidiary. Post-Merger, Exelon BSC
intends to add the former PSEG
companies as client companies under
the General Services Agreement and
would provide to the new client
companies the same administrative,
management, and technical services that
it now provides to Exelon system
companies, utilizing the same work
order procedures and the same methods
of allocating costs that are specified in
the General Services Agreement.12 In
connection with the Transaction, certain
employees of PSEG Services may be
transferred to and become employees of
Exelon BSC, which would be the sole
subsidiary service company for the
Exelon system.
Exelon requests that the Commission
find, that Exelon BSC would continue to
be organized and conducted in
accordance with section 13(b) of the
Act. Applicants request authority to
delay the full implementation of all
services and systems relative to the new
11 Under the 2000 Merger Order, Exelon BSC is
required to give written notice to the Commission
at least 60 days prior to implementing any change
in the type and character of the companies
receiving services, the methods of allocating costs
to associate companies, or the scope or character of
services to be rendered.
12 Exelon and PSE&G are seeking approval of the
General Services Agreement from the NJBPU.
PO 00000
Frm 00070
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
1575
PSEG clients until after February 8,
2006.
B. Other Inter-Company Goods and
Services At Cost
1. Incidental Services
The 2000 Merger Order recognized
that ComEd, PECO and Exelon
Generation may provide services
incidental to their utility businesses,
such as infrastructure services and
storm outage emergency repairs, to one
another and other associate companies
in accordance with rules 87, 90 and 91.
Accordingly, Applicants propose that,
following the Merger, PSE&G also may
provide these incidental services to, or
receive these incidental services from,
the other Exelon companies. PSE&G also
may provide goods, through a leasing
arrangement or otherwise, to one or
more associate companies, and may use
certain assets for the benefit of one or
more associate companies.
2. Services Required for the Efficient
Operation of Exelon Generation’s
Businesses
Under the 2000 Merger Order, the
Commission authorized Exelon
Generation and any future subsidiary of
Exelon Generation and AmerGen Energy
Company, LLC (‘‘AmerGen’’) to provide
services at cost to each other as required
for the efficient operation of the Exelon
system generating facilities. Although
Exelon Generation is an ‘‘electric utility
company’’ under the Act, it is not
subject to state rate regulation and has
no ‘‘captive’’ customers. Following the
Merger, as is the case now, Exelon
Generation would own and operate
generating facilities, engage in energy
marketing and trading, and invest in
and own exempt wholesale generators,
intermediate companies and other
permitted investments such as Rule 58
energy-related companies, all of which
are operated as an integral part of its
system generating facilities.
Accordingly, Exelon Generation
proposes that post-Merger it, and all of
its current and future subsidiaries,
including the former PSEG subsidiaries,
provide services at cost to each other.
3. Services at the Interface Between
Generation and Transmission and
Distribution
Under the 2000 Merger Order, the
Commission authorized Exelon
Generation to render and receive
services at cost from ComEd and PECO
related to the interface—primarily
switchyard facilities—between the
generation function of Exelon
Generation and the transmission and
distribution functions of ComEd and
E:\FR\FM\10JAN1.SGM
10JAN1
1576
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 6 / Tuesday, January 10, 2006 / Notices
wwhite on PROD1PC65 with NOTICES
PECO. Applicants request authorization
for ComEd, PECO, PSE&G, Exelon
Generation and its subsidiaries to render
and receive the same types of services
at cost, among each other following the
Merger.
4. Exelon Generation Services in
Connection With Supply of Electricity
and Natural Gas
a. Scheduling Coordination
Agreements. Applicants state that
PSE&G is obligated to purchase
electricity from certain QFs, is obligated
to purchase electricity from certain
EWGs under restructured former
PURPA contracts, and receives an
allocation of hydroelectric power from
the St. Lawrence Power Project. Further,
that under a stipulation filed at the
NJBPU, PSE&G is obligated to resell this
power at wholesale into the PJM spot
market. As PSE&G owns no generation
and engages in no other wholesale
energy transactions, it relies upon its
affiliate PSEG ER&T to schedule these
transactions on its behalf and to submit
bids for capacity as directed by PSE&G.
PSEG ER&T also fulfills certain billing
and accounting functions with respect
to such energy and capacity. These
services are provided under two
agreements (‘‘Scheduling Coordination
Agreements’’) pursuant to which PSE&G
receives the full PJM market value for
the electricity. PSE&G either (i) pays
PSEG ER&T a cost-based fee, or (ii)
enables PSEG ER&T to receive a credit
from PJM for capacity from the
purchases described above against any
emergency power it would otherwise
have to pay for under the PJM Open
Access Transmission Tariff. The
Applicants represent that the
Scheduling Coordination Agreements
will be assumed by Exelon Generation
by operation of law.
b. BGSS Gas Contract. The Applicants
state that PSEG ER&T provides fullrequirements gas supply service to
PSE&G pursuant to a contract approved
by the NJBPU for the purpose of
satisfying all of PSE&G’s retail gas
service obligations (‘‘BGSS Gas
Contract’’). As part of the transaction
approved by the NJBPU, PSEG ER&T
assumed the PSE&G entitlements under
most of its gas transportation and
storage contracts with interstate
pipelines. In a few cases, the
entitlements remained with PSE&G and
PSEG ER&T administers the contracts as
PSE&G’s agent. The Applicants state
that the BGSS Gas Contract will be
assumed by Exelon Generation by
operation of law.
Under the 2000 Merger Order, the
Commission authorized Exelon
Generation to provide, at cost, supply
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:09 Jan 09, 2006
Jkt 208001
planning services and assistance to
ComEd and PECO and to assist the
utilities in obtaining energy supply
resources from unaffiliated sellers, in
each case in connection with the
utility’s unbundled retail sales and/or
wholesale sales, to the extent that
energy supply is not provided by Exelon
Generation. Applicants state that the
Retail Utility Subsidiaries might require
assistance from Exelon Generation with
respect to the procurement process for
the procurement of energy for the
utilities’ bundled as well as unbundled
retail sales. For this reason, and also to
allow Exelon Generation to provide any
jurisdictional services currently
provided by PSEG ER&T pursuant to the
Scheduling Coordination Agreements
and the BGSS Gas Contract, the
Applicants request that the
authorization obtained in the 2000
Merger Order be modified not only to
include PSE&G, but also to relate to the
Retail Utility Subsidiaries’ bundled
retail sales, as well as unbundled retail
sales and/or wholesale sales, of both
electricity and natural gas. Thus, the
Applicants request that the Commission
authorize Exelon Generation to provide,
at cost, supply planning services and
assistance to the Retail Utility
Subsidiaries and to assist the utilities in
obtaining, or disposing of, energy
supply resources from unaffiliated
sellers, in each case in connection with
the Retail Utility Subsidiaries’ bundled
and unbundled retail sales and/or
wholesale sales, to the extent that
energy supply is not provided by Exelon
Generation.13
5. Modification of Intercompany
Services Authorized by the 2000 Merger
Order
Applicants state that ComEd currently
provides to and receives from affiliates
certain services in accordance with an
Affiliated Interests Agreement (‘‘ComEd
AIA’’) approved by the ICC. PECO’s
form of Mutual Services Agreement
(‘‘PECO MSA’’) under which PECO
provides and receives certain services
from affiliates has been approved by the
PAPUC. In connection with the Merger,
Applicants state that PSE&G plans to
enter into a Mutual Services Agreement
(the ‘‘PSE&G MSA’’) to govern affiliated
interest transactions between PSE&G
13 Applicants state that the described services will
be provided at cost, with the exception of some
services under the Scheduling Coordination
Agreements, which provide, as an alternate
mechanism for PSE&G to compensate PSEG ER&T
(Exelon Generation after the Exelon Generation
Restructuring) for scheduling coordination services,
for PSEG ER&T to receive a credit from PJM for
capacity.
PO 00000
Frm 00071
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
and its affiliates at cost, consistent with
Rules 90 and 91.14
Applicants state that the 2000 Merger
Order approved individual contracts
pursuant to which ComEd and PECO
received or rendered services at other
than cost. Further, that those
arrangements or contracts have all either
concluded, or are being conducted
currently at cost. Exelon proposes to
modify the service providers and
recipients under the types of services so
described in the 2000 Merger Order so
that each of ComEd, PECO, PSE&G and
Exelon Generation may provide, at cost,
the listed services to associate
companies in the new Exelon system
under the same conditions as currently
apply to the Exelon system
companies.15
In addition to the services authorized
by the 2000 Merger Order, Applicants
request authorization for the following
additional services to be provided at
cost. These services would also be
subject to the reporting requirements
discussed above:
(a) PowerLabs Services to ComEd,
PECO and PSE&G. Exelon Generation
was authorized to provide Instrument
Calibration services to PECO and, since
the time of the 2000 Merger Order, has
done so through Exelon PowerLabs, LLC
(‘‘PowerLabs’’), a first-tier Rule 58
subsidiary of Exelon Generation.
PowerLabs also provides Instrument
Calibration and other technical services
at cost, pursuant to Rule 87(b)(1), to
Exelon BSC, which passes them
through, at cost, to ComEd and PECO.
Applicants request that PowerLabs be
authorized to provide Instrument
Calibration and other technical services,
(including component testing and
failure analysis) at cost, directly to
ComEd, PECO and PSE&G, in addition
to Exelon Generation.
(b) Energy Efficiency Audit Services
by the Retail Utility Subsidiaries to
Other Exelon Companies. ComEd
Technical Services performs site
efficiency assessments, which review
current energy use profiles and identify
cost-savings opportunities (‘‘Energy
Efficiency Audit Services’’). ComEd has
14 Exelon and PSE&G are seeking approval of the
PSE&G MSA from the NJBPU.
15 Such services include: services provided by the
Retail Utility Subsidiaries: regulatory and
legislative services, call center, central mail, fleet
services, real estate and facilities, distribution
technical services, telephone overflow coverage,
strategic marketing and sourcing, installation and
maintenance of substation equipment, purchase of
materials and logistics, metering equipment and
rubber goods, customer services rep emergency
training, environmental and lab services, training
for electrical and fire; and services provided by
Exelon Generation: instrument calibration,
operation of Richmond Frequency Converters and
synchronous condenser maintenance.
E:\FR\FM\10JAN1.SGM
10JAN1
wwhite on PROD1PC65 with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 6 / Tuesday, January 10, 2006 / Notices
provided a small volume of these
services at cost to Exelon Generation
and PECO under Rules 87, 90 and 91.
Applicants request the Retail Utility
Subsidiaries be authorized to provide
Energy Efficiency Audit Services to
other companies in the Exelon system at
cost.
(c) Exelon Generation Maintenance,
Repair and Plant Engineering Services.
PSEG Power provides a range of
specialized maintenance, repair and
plant engineering services on energyrelated electro-mechanical equipment.
PSEG Power provides these services to
PSEG Fossil and its EWG subsidiaries,
as well as to PSEG Nuclear, PSE&G and
PSEG Services. PSEG Power charges its
affiliates a blended hourly rate that
recovers the fully allocated cost of
providing these services. PSEG Power
charges PSE&G approximately $3.4
million on an annual basis for the
services it provides to PSE&G. PSEG
Power charges PSEG Fossil’s EWG
subsidiaries approximately $150,000 on
an annual basis for the services it
provides to these entities. After the
Exelon Generation Restructuring, PSEG
Power will be part of Exelon Generation.
Thus, Applicants request authorization
for Exelon Generation to provide these
services, at cost, to other Exelon
companies, including, PSE&G, Exelon
BSC, ComEd and PECO.
(d) Peak Shaving Services. To
facilitate PSEG ER&T’s provision of
BGSS to PSE&G, PSE&G provides a
peaking natural gas supply to PSEG
ER&T from three Liquefied Propane Air
(‘‘LPA’’) Plants and one Liquefied
Natural Gas (‘‘LNG’’) Plant. PSE&G
charges PSEG ER&T for all labor,
material and other costs that are
required to operate and maintain the
facilities along with a carrying cost for
the return on and depreciation of the
investment. Applicants request
authorization for PSE&G to provide
these peak shaving services to Exelon
Generation, as successor to PSEG ER&T
and for PECO to provide similar peak
shaving services to Exelon Generation,
in the event PECO enters into similar
arrangements with Exelon Generation.
(e) All services required to manage
and operate the facilities of the Indiana
Company are provided by either Exelon
BSC or ComEd. Exelon BSC has
authority to provide the services it
currently provides to the Indiana
Company. To date, ComEd has
provided, at cost, incidental services in
connection with operation and
maintenance of the Indiana Company’s
transmission assets, as well as various
administrative and managerial services.
Applicants request that ComEd be
authorized to provide operation and
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:09 Jan 09, 2006
Jkt 208001
maintenance services and
administrative and managerial services,
at cost, to the Indiana Company on an
ongoing basis.
X. Issuance of Common Stock in the
Merger
Exelon requests approval to issue that
number of shares of its common stock
necessary to comply with its obligations
under the Merger Agreement. Exelon
expects that it would issue
approximately 341 million shares of
common stock to the former holders of
PSEG common stock in the Merger. This
includes approximately 14 million
shares of common stock, or options on
its common stock, that Exelon would be
required to issue at the consummation
of the Merger to satisfy the obligations
under various PSEG stock option and
employee benefit plans.
Upon completion of the Merger, each
outstanding option to purchase shares of
PSEG common stock would be assumed
by Exelon and substituted with an
option to purchase shares of Exelon
common stock, exercisable on generally
the same terms and conditions that
applied before the Merger. The number
of shares of Exelon common stock
subject to the substitute Exelon stock
option would equal the number of
shares of PSEG common stock subject to
the PSEG stock option immediately
prior to completion of the Merger,
multiplied by the exchange ratio,
rounded down to the nearest whole
share. The per share exercise price of
each substitute Exelon stock option
would equal the exercise price of the
PSEG stock option immediately prior to
completion of the Merger divided by the
exchange ratio, rounded up to the
nearest whole cent. In addition, upon
completion of the Merger, Exelon would
assume all PSEG equity-based awards
and substitute them with equity-based
awards with respect to shares of Exelon
common stock on generally the same
terms and conditions that applied before
completion of the Merger. The number
of shares of Exelon common stock
issuable under those awards, and the
exercise prices for those awards, would
be adjusted to take into account the
exchange ratio (1.225) in the Merger.
XI. PSEG Indebtedness Assumed
As a consequence of the Merger and
the Exelon Generation Restructuring, all
the existing consolidated indebtedness
of PSEG would become consolidated
indebtedness of Exelon. As the
surviving entity in the Merger, Exelon
would become the successor obligor on
all outstanding indebtedness directly
issued by PSEG. Further, subject to
receipt of the appropriate consents,
PO 00000
Frm 00072
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
1577
upon the Exelon Generation
Restructuring, indebtedness and
obligations of PSEG Power, PSEG
Nuclear, PSEG Fossil and PSEG ER&T
would become obligations of Exelon
Generation. Prior to the closing of the
Merger, PSEG Power’s debt holders
would be solicited for consent to
amendments to certain of its existing
debt instruments to reflect the changes
in credit profile and other
circumstances that would result from
the assumption by Exelon Generation of
PSEG Power indebtedness.
Applicants state that Exelon would
not legally assume or become successor
obligor on any outstanding indebtedness
of PSEG system companies, except for
PSEG indebtedness for which Exelon is
successor obligor. Exelon may issue
guaranties on behalf of former PSEG
system companies subject to the
limitations on guaranties contained in
the 2004 Financing Order, modified as
described below. Likewise, except for
the obligations of PSEG Power, PSEG
Nuclear, PSEG Fossil and PSEG ER&T
for which Exelon Generation becomes
successor obligor in the Generation
Restructuring, Exelon Generation would
not legally assume any outstanding
indebtedness of any PSEG system
company. Exelon Generation may issue
guaranties on behalf of former PSEG
system companies subject to the
limitations on guaranties contained in
the 2004 Financing Order, modified as
described below.
Applicants seek approval for the
consolidation of indebtedness, or in the
case of Exelon and Exelon Generation,
becoming the successor obligor under
the indebtedness, and continuation of
inter-company guaranties, as described
above. Applicants further request
authority to continue existing financing
arrangements, guarantees and hedging
arrangements, as well as any
transactions undertaken to extend the
terms of or replace, refund or refinance
existing obligations and the issuance of
new obligations in exchange for existing
obligations, provided in each case that
the issuing entity’s total capitalization is
not increased as a result of such
financing transaction except as
permitted by the 2004 Financing Order
modified as discussed below.
XII. Modifications to 2004 Financing
Order
A. The 2004 Financing Order
The Commission issued the 2004
Financing Order which authorized,
through April 15, 2007, certain
financing transactions, including the
issuance of common stock, preferred
securities, equity-linked securities, long-
E:\FR\FM\10JAN1.SGM
10JAN1
1578
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 6 / Tuesday, January 10, 2006 / Notices
wwhite on PROD1PC65 with NOTICES
term debt and short-term debt in an
aggregate amount not to exceed $8
billion above the amount outstanding
for Exelon and Exelon Generation at
December 31, 2003, with no separate
sublimit for short-term debt. The 2004
Financing Order also authorized the use
of up to $4 billion of the proceeds of
financings for investments in EWGs and
FUCOs, and reserved jurisdiction over a
request to use an additional $3 billion
of the proceeds of financings for
investments in EWGs and FUCOs.
Because the 2004 Financing Order did
not contemplate a transaction of the
magnitude of the current Merger, Exelon
requests approval for the issuance of its
common stock in the Merger and related
to stock options and employee plans.
Except for the issuance of common
stock in the Merger and the specific
modifications listed below, however,
Applicants state that Exelon does not
seek any changes to the approvals
granted in the 2004 Financing Order.
In particular, Exelon is not proposing
to increase the authorized amount of
new financing it will be permitted above
the existing authorized $8 billion.
Applicants, citing to the 2004 Financing
Order, note: ‘‘Applicants state that [the
$8 billion External Limit] does not
include the refunding or replacement of
securities where capitalization is not
increased from that in place at [a
specified date]. Applicants state that
any refunding or replacement of
securities where capitalization is not
increased from that in place at [the
specified date] will be through the
issuance of securities of the type
authorized in [the 2004 Financing
Order].’’ Applicants request that the
base level of capitalization, against
which the authorized increase of $8
billion will be measured, will be
adjusted to be the pro forma
capitalization of Exelon or Exelon
Generation, as the case may be, as of the
date of consummation of the Merger and
Exelon Generation Restructuring.
Exelon proposes that the 2004
Financing Order will remain in full
force and effect, including all
parameters, restrictions and conditions
imposed in the 2004 Financing Order,
except to the extent expressly modified
by the Commission’s order in this
matter.
1. Requested Modifications of 2004
Financing Order 16
Applicants seek the following
modifications to the 2004 Financing
Order:
16 Capitalized terms not otherwise defined herein
shall have the meanings assigned to such terms in
the 2004 Financing Order.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:09 Jan 09, 2006
Jkt 208001
i. The definition of ‘‘Utility
Subsidiaries’’ under the 2004 Financing
Order be amended to include PSE&G,
and the definition of ‘‘Nonutility
Subsidiaries’’ be amended to include all
non-utility subsidiary companies of
PSEG.
ii. The Utility Money Pool authority
be amended to permit: (a) PSE&G to
become a participant in the Utility
Money Pool, with a participation limit
for borrowing of $1 billion, and (b)
Exelon Generation to borrow up to $1.5
billion (an increase from $1 billion) at
any one time outstanding from the
Utility Money Pool 17, and (c) PSEG
Holdings to participate in the Utility
Money Pool as a lender to, but not as a
borrower from, the Utility Money Pool.
iii. To authorize the establishment of
a Nonutility Money Pool.
iv. To add authority for PSE&G to
enter into Hedge Instruments and
Anticipatory Hedges of the same type
and under the same conditions as
authorized under the 2004 Financing
Order.
v. To add authority for Exelon to enter
into guarantees to or on behalf of the
PSEG companies, and PSE&G to enter
into Non-Exempt Utility Guarantees, all
under the terms and conditions
authorized under the 2004 Financing
Order.
vi. To increase to $8 billion (from the
current $6 billion) the aggregate
authority for Exelon and Exelon
Generation to issue guaranties.
vii. To add authority for PSE&G to pay
dividends out of capital to the extent of
PSE&G’s retained earnings immediately
prior to the Merger where such retained
earnings are transferred to paid in
capital in accordance with purchase
accounting.
viii. To add authority for Delivery to
pay dividends out of capital to the
extent of PSE&G’s retained earnings
immediately prior to the Merger where
such retained earnings are transferred to
paid in capital in accordance with
purchase accounting.
ix. To add authority for Exelon
Generation to pay dividends out of
capital to the extent of the retained
earnings of PSEG Power, PSEG Nuclear,
PSEG Fossil and PSEG ER&T
immediately prior to the Merger where
such retained earnings are transferred to
paid in capital in accordance with
purchase accounting.
x. To add authority for Ventures to
pay dividends out of capital to the
extent of the retained earnings of (A)
17 Applicants state that the 2004 Financing Order
authorized Unicom Investments, Inc. to participate
in the Utility Money Pool as a lender only. Unicom
Investments, Inc. has been reorganized and is now
UII, LLC.
PO 00000
Frm 00073
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
PSEG Power, PSEG Nuclear, PSEG
Fossil and PSEG ER&T immediately
prior to the Merger where such retained
earnings are transferred to paid in
capital in accordance with purchase
accounting and (B) PSEG Holdings
immediately prior to the Merger where
such retained earnings are transferred to
paid in capital in accordance with
purchase accounting in the event PSEG
Holdings becomes a subsidiary of
Ventures rather than a direct subsidiary
of Exelon.18
xi. To increase Exelon’s authority to
pay dividends out of capital by the
amount of PSEG’s retained earnings
immediately prior to the Merger where
such retained earnings are transferred to
paid in capital in accordance with
purchase accounting.19
xii. To add authority for Exelon,
Exelon Generation, Ventures, Delivery
and PSE&G to declare and pay
dividends out of current earnings before
any deduction resulting from
impairment of goodwill or other
intangibles recognized as a result of the
Merger.20
xiii. To increase to 75 million shares
(from 42 million shares approved by the
2004 Financing Order) the number of
shares of Exelon common stock that
may be issued, following the Merger,
under Exelon’s dividend reinvestment
plan, employee stock ownership plan,
certain incentive compensation plans
and certain other employee benefit
plans, including PSEG plans assumed as
part of the Merger, as described below
(collectively, the ‘‘Plans’’).
xiv. To increase the amount of
financing proceeds that may be used for
investments in EWGs and FUCOs such
that ‘‘aggregate investment’’ does not
exceed $8 billion (an increase from $4
billion currently authorized).
xv. To provide that the base
capitalization against which the limit of
additional financing of $8 billion
authorized in the 2004 Financing Order
is measured shall be the pro forma
capitalization of Exelon or Exelon
Generation as the case may be, as of the
date of consummation of the Merger and
the Exelon Generation Restructuring. As
required under the 2004 Financing
Order, all financing where capitalization
18 Such dividend authority is requested in the
event that Exelon were to do an internal
restructuring to move PSEG Holdings, a non-utility
subsidiary to be a subsidiary of Ventures rather than
as a direct first tier subsidiary of Exelon as is
contemplated following the Merger.
19 This new approval would not affect the
authority of ComEd and Exelon to pay dividends
out of capital as approved in the 2004 Financing
Order.
20 Applicants ask the Commission to reserve
jurisdiction over their request pending completion
of the record.
E:\FR\FM\10JAN1.SGM
10JAN1
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 6 / Tuesday, January 10, 2006 / Notices
is not increased from that in place at the
Merger date will be through the
issuance of securities of the type
authorized in the 2004 Financing Order,
modified as described herein, and
subject to the Financing Parameters (as
defined in the 2004 Financing Order).21
xvi. To add authority for Exelon
Generation to engage in tax-exempt
financing pursuant to sale or lease
transactions of its utility assets as
described below.
2. Parameters for Financing
Authorization
The proposed financing transactions
would be subject to the Financing
Parameters, as set forth in the 2004
Financing Order. The 30% common
equity condition shall apply to PSE&G
as a ‘‘Utility Subsidiary.’’ The 30%
Condition would be unchanged for
Exelon, ComEd, PECO and Exelon
Generation. Finally, the Investment
Grade Condition (as defined in the 2004
Financing Order) would apply to PSE&G
to the extent it requires Commission
approval for any securities issuance.
3. Filing of Certificates of Notification
Exelon currently files quarterly
reports in connection with the 2004
Financing Order. Applicants propose to
continue to file Rule 24 certificates
through February 8, 2006 containing the
information required by the 2004
Financing Order for the post-Merger
Exelon system, including equivalent
information relating to former PSEG
system subsidiaries.
4. Increase in Shares for Plans; New and
Adopted Plans
wwhite on PROD1PC65 with NOTICES
The 2004 Financing Order authorized
Exelon to issue and/or acquire in open
market transactions, or by some other
method which complies with applicable
law and Commission interpretations
then in effect, up to 42 million shares
21 The capitalization base for Exelon and Exelon
Generation, respectively, would be measured
according to the balance sheet prepared to reflect
consummation of the Merger, by taking the postMerger outstanding common stock or membership
interests (excluding retained earnings), preferred
and preference securities, long-term debt, shortterm debt, current portion of long-term debt and
securitization obligations, as applicable, of Exelon
and Exelon Generation. Increases in capitalization
through securities issuances of Exelon and Exelon
Generation, as the case may be, would count
towards the $8 billion limit; but increases in
consolidated capitalization resulting from exempt
securities issuances (such as issuances of state
commission approved securities by the Retail
Utility Subsidiaries) and increases to retained
earnings will not reduce available financing.
Retirement or redemption of securities or
reductions in equity through stock buybacks by
Exelon or Exelon Generation, as the case may be,
in each case with available funds will
correspondingly increase available financing.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:09 Jan 09, 2006
Jkt 208001
of Exelon common stock (adjusted for a
stock split) under Exelon’s dividend
reinvestment plan, employee stock
ownership plan, certain incentive
compensation plans and certain other
employee benefit plans. Such issuances
are in addition to common stock that
may be issued under the general
financing authorization of $8 billion.
Exelon proposes to increase the number
of shares authorized for this purpose to
75 million to accommodate two new
Exelon plans and the former PSEG plans
that would become Exelon’s
responsibility following the Merger.
Exelon stock would be used, following
the Merger, to satisfy requirements
under the PSEG plans to provide
common stock.
5. Nonutility Money Pool
In the 2004 Financing Order, the
Commission reserved jurisdiction over
the formation of the Nonutility Money
Pool. Applicants request that the
Commission release jurisdiction over
the formation of the Nonutility Money
Pool. The Nonutility Money Pool is to
be operated on the same terms and
conditions as the Utility Money Pool,
except that Exelon funds made available
to the Money Pools would be made
available to the Utility Money Pool first
to the extent it is operated and needed
and thereafter to the Nonutility Money
Pool. None of the Utility Subsidiaries
would be a participant in the Nonutility
Money Pool, and no loans through the
Nonutility Money Pool would be made
to, and no borrowings through the
Nonutility Money Pool would be made
by, Exelon, Ventures or Delivery.
Furthermore, Applicants request
authority for other Non-Utility
Subsidiaries (i.e., Non-Utility
Subsidiaries that are not currently
anticipated to participate in the NonUtility Money Pool and such that are
acquired or formed in the future,
collectively, ‘‘Other Non-Utility
Subsidiaries’’) may lend funds to and
borrow from the Non-Utility Money
Pool, when established, without the
need for additional authority from the
Commission.
6. Exelon Generation Tax-Exempt
Financing
Applicants state that Exelon
Generation may be able to incur lower
financing costs by taking advantage of
tax-exempt financing where a
governmental entity, such as a county or
a state authority or agency, issues
securities and lends the proceeds to
Exelon Generation or where Exelon
Generation sells or leases an undivided
interest in one or more of its generating
facilities and related assets to the
PO 00000
Frm 00074
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
1579
governmental entity and leases back or
purchases the assets and operates such
assets as before. In connection with
such transactions, Exelon Generation
seeks approval for the sale, lease or
other transfer and lease back, purchase
or other operating arrangement of
generating and related assets that
constitute utility assets under the Act.
Such sale, lease or other transfer and
lease back, purchase or other operation
arrangement would be solely for
financing purposes and would not affect
the operation of the assets.
XIII. Retention of Nonutility
Subsidiaries
Exhibit G–7 (attached to the
Application) lists and describes those
non-utility businesses conducted by
PSEG and its subsidiary companies. As
a result of the Merger, those non-utility
businesses and interests would become
businesses and interests of Exelon.
Except as discussed (in Exhibit G–7),
Applicants request authority to retain
these non-utility interests.
Applicants ask the Commission to
find that pre-existing investments by
PSEG and its subsidiaries in ‘‘energyrelated companies’’ prior to the effective
date of Rule 58 will not count in the
calculation of the 15% limitation for
purposes of the safe harbor under Rule
58.
XIV. Post-Merger Corporate Structure:
The Intermediate Holding Company
Post-Merger, there would be one
instance of a ‘‘great-grandfather’’
holding company, the existence of
which the Commission approved in the
2000 Merger Order. Exelon, through
Delivery, owns substantially all of the
outstanding common stock of ComEd
which, in turn, is a holding company for
the Indiana Company. The Indiana
Company has no retail customers and
owns only transmission facilities with a
depreciated book value at December 31,
2004 of only $7.4 million. The operation
of the Indiana Company’s transmission
facilities is subject to the control of PJM.
Accordingly, the Indiana Company has
virtually no business operations with
outside third parties.
Applicants state that, PSE&G has
pending an application with the NJBPU
seeking approval in connection with the
issuance of up to $150 million of
securitization obligations under N.J.S.A.
48:3–57. If the application is approved,
Applicants state that the NJBPU would
authorize a transition bond charge
which amounts would be sold by
PSE&G to a special purpose Financing
Subsidiary in connection with the
securitization financing. Because PSE&G
will be covered by the general
E:\FR\FM\10JAN1.SGM
10JAN1
1580
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 6 / Tuesday, January 10, 2006 / Notices
authorizations applicable to the Exelon
system approving formation and
activities of Financing Subsidiaries and
entering into servicing agreements at
‘‘market rates’’ in compliance with
rating agency requirements, Applicants
state that PSE&G will need no further
approval from the Commission for the
proposed $150 million securitization
financing.
Exelon (70–10294) and the other
Applicants state that they consent and
agree that consummation by them of the
Merger shall constitute their acceptance
of the survival of the Implementation
Order notwithstanding the effectiveness
of the repeal of the Act.
Nancy M. Morris,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. E6–84 Filed 1–9–06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8010–01–P
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
COMMISSION
[Release No. 34–53050; File No. SR–Amex–
2005–114]
Self-Regulatory Organizations;
American Stock Exchange LLC; Order
Granting Approval of a Proposed Rule
Change and Amendment No. 1 Thereto
Relating to the Amex Initial Listing
Standards
January 3, 2006.
wwhite on PROD1PC65 with NOTICES
I. Introduction
On November 2, 2005, the American
Stock Exchange LLC (‘‘Amex’’ or
‘‘Exchange’’) filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission
(‘‘Commission’’), pursuant to section
19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934 (‘‘Act’’) 1 and Rule 19b–4
thereunder,2 a proposed rule change to
amend section 102(b) of the Amex
Company Guide (‘‘Company Guide’’) to
require a minimum market price of $2
per share for issuers seeking to qualify
for initial listing pursuant to Initial
Listing Standard 3 (Section 101(c) of the
Company Guide). On November 10,
2005, the Exchange filed Amendment
No. 1 (‘‘Amendment No. 1’’) to the
proposed rule change to amend section
101 of the Company Guide to include a
reference to section 102(b) of the
Company Guide in each of the four
initial Amex listings standards to clarify
that section 102(b) of the Company
Guide applies to each standard.3 The
1 15
U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
2 17 CFR 240.19b–4.
3 Amendment No. 1 clarified the purpose section
of the filing and made proposed changes to section
101 of the Company Guide to reference section
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:09 Jan 09, 2006
Jkt 208001
proposed rule change and Amendment
No. 1 were published for comment in
the Federal Register on November 28,
2005.4 The Commission received no
comments on the proposal. This order
approves the proposed rule change, as
amended.
II. Description
In its filing, the Amex stated that an
approval of an application for the listing
of securities on the Exchange is based
on an applicant’s ability to satisfy a
series of quantitative and qualitative
listing standards as evaluated by the
Listing Qualifications Department. The
Amex represented that the quantitative
standards currently provide four
alternative approaches for a company to
satisfy the Amex’s initial listing
standards.
For applicants to meet Initial Listing
Standards 1, 2, and 4 (Company Guide
Section 101(a), (b), and (d),
respectively), in addition to specified
minimum numerical standards, the
Exchange requires a minimum market
price of $3 per share. The Amex noted
that although Listing Standard 3
currently requires an applicant to meet
minimum specified numerical
standards, it does not require the
applicant to meet a minimum market
price per share.
The Exchange proposed to enhance its
initial listing quantitative standards to
require applicants seeking to qualify
under Initial Listing Standard 3
pursuant to section 101(c) of the
Company Guide to have a minimum
market price of $2 per share. In order to
do so, the Exchange proposed to amend
section 102(b) to incorporate this
requirement. The Exchange also
proposed to amend section 101 of the
Company Guide to include a reference
to section 102(b) of the Company Guide
in each of the four initial listing
standards to clarify that section 102(b)
of the Company Guide applies to each
of the four listing standards.5
In addition, the Exchange proposed to
delete the last sentence of section 102(b)
of the Company Guide. The Exchange
noted that this provision, which has
been in place for many years, gives the
Exchange the discretion under certain
circumstances to consider listing an
issue that qualified under Initial Listing
Standards 1, 2, or 4 even if the issue’s
share price is less than $3. The
Exchange represented that this
provision was meant to cover the
situation in which an applicant issuer
meets all of the initial listing standards
but experiences a decline in share price
to below $3 per share just before listing.
In light of the current and proposed
configuration of the initial listing
standards, the Exchange stated that it
believes that this provision is no longer
necessary or appropriate.6
III. Discussion
After careful consideration, the
Commission finds that the proposed
rule change, as amended, is consistent
with section 6(b) of the Act,7 in general,
and furthers the objectives of section
6(b)(5) of the Act,8 in particular, in that
it is designed to prevent fraudulent and
manipulative acts and practices, to
promote just and equitable principles of
trade, to foster cooperation and
coordination with persons engaged in
regulating, clearing, settling, processing
information with respect to, and
facilitating transactions in securities, to
remove impediments to and perfect the
mechanism of a free and open market
and a national market system, and, in
general, to protect investors and the
public interest, and is not designed to
permit unfair discrimination between
customers, issuers, brokers, or dealers.9
The Commission believes that the
proposed rule change will allow for the
evaluation of an issuer’s initial listing
eligibility against more comprehensive
criteria and strengthen the listing
standards of the Amex. The Commission
notes that the three other listing
standards (i.e., Listing Standards 1, 2,
and 4) of the Amex already contain a $3
market price requirement.10 The
adoption of a $2 minimum market price
for listing under section 101(c) of the
Company Guide will help to ensure that
all companies initially listing on Amex
under section 101 must meet a
minimum price requirement. The
Commission notes that under section
101 of the Company Guide, the fact that
an applicant may meet the Amex’s
numerical standards does not
necessarily mean its application will be
approved, and section 101 of the
Company Guide sets forth other factors
the Exchange may consider for listing,
including the nature of the applicant’s
business and the reputation of
management, among others. The
Commission expects Amex to continue
6 Id.
7 15
U.S.C. 78f(b).
U.S.C. 78f(b)(5).
9 In approving this proposal, the Commission has
considered the proposed rule’s impact on
efficiency, competition, and capital formation. 15
U.S.C. 78c(f).
10 See Sections 101 and 102 of the Company
Guide.
8 15
102(b) of the Company Guide in the listing
provisions.
4 Securities Exchange Act Release No. 52804
(November 18, 2005), 70 FR 71342 (November 28,
2005) (SR–Amex–2005–114).
5 See Amendment No. 1, supra note 3.
PO 00000
Frm 00075
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
E:\FR\FM\10JAN1.SGM
10JAN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 71, Number 6 (Tuesday, January 10, 2006)]
[Notices]
[Pages 1569-1580]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E6-84]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
[Release No. 35-28079]
Filing Under the Public Utility Holding Company Act of 1935, as
Amended (``Act'')
December 30, 2005.
Notice is hereby given that the following filing has been made with
the Commission pursuant to provisions of the Act and rules promulgated
under the Act. All interested persons are referred to the application-
declaration for complete statements of the proposed transactions
summarized below. The application-declaration and any amendments are
available for public inspection through the Commission's Branch of
Public Reference.
Interested persons wishing to comment or request a hearing on the
application-declaration should submit their views in writing by January
23, 2006, to the Secretary, Securities and Exchange Commission,
Washington, DC 20549-0609, and serve a copy on Applicants at the
addresses specified below. Proof of service (by affidavit or, in the
case of an attorney at law, by certificate) should be filed with the
request. Any request for hearing should identify specifically the
issues of fact or law that are disputed. A person who so requests will
be notified of any hearing, if ordered, and will receive a copy of any
notice or order issued in this matter. After January 23, 2006, the
application-declaration, as filed or as amended, may be granted and/or
permitted to become effective.
Exelon Corporation et al. (70-10294)
Exelon Corporation (``Exelon''), a registered holding company;
Exelon's public utility subsidiaries Commonwealth Edison (``ComEd'');
Exelon Generation Company, LLC (``Exelon Generation''), 300 Exelon Way,
Kennet Square, PA 19348; PECO Energy Company (``PECO'') 2301 Market
Street, Philadelphia, PA; Commonwealth Edison Company of Indiana, Inc.
(``Indiana Company''); Exelon's nonutility registered holding company
subsidiaries Exelon Energy Delivery Company, LLC (``Delivery'') and
Exelon Ventures Company, LLC (``Ventures''); and Exelon's nonutility
subsidiaries (``Nonutility Subsidiaries''), each located at 10 South
Dearborn Street, Chicago, Illinois 60603; Public Service Enterprise
Group Incorporated (``PSEG''), an exempt public utility holding
company, Public Service Electric and Gas Company (``PSE&G''), a public
utility company subsidiary of PSEG, and its nonutility subsidiaries,
each located at 80 Park Plaza, Newark, New Jersey 07102 (collectively
``Applicants'') have filed an application-declaration (``Application'')
with the Commission under sections 6(a), 7, 9(a), 10, 11, 12, 13(b),
32, 33 and 34 of the Act and rules 42, 43, 44, 45, 46, 53, and 54 under
the Act.\1\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ The Applicants are Exelon and its Subsidiaries and PSEG and
its Subsidiaries and such other direct and indirect subsidiary
companies that Exelon may form or acquire in accordance with a
Commission order or otherwise in accordance with the Act or a rule
promulgated under the Act.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
I. Overview of the Merger
On December 20, 2004, Exelon and PSEG, an electric and gas utility
holding company that claims exemption from registration pursuant to
Rule 2 under section 3(a)(1) of the Act, entered into an Agreement and
Plan of Merger (the ``Merger Agreement''). Under the terms of the
Merger Agreement, PSEG would merge into Exelon (the ``Merger''). Each
PSEG shareholder would be entitled to receive 1.225 shares of Exelon
common stock for each PSEG share held and cash in lieu of any fraction
of an Exelon share that a PSEG shareholder would have otherwise been
entitled to receive. Exelon common stock would be unaffected by the
Merger, with each issued and outstanding share remaining outstanding
following the Merger as a share in the surviving company. Upon
completion of the Merger, Exelon would change its name to Exelon
Electric & Gas Corporation.
As the surviving company in the Merger, Exelon would remain the
ultimate corporate parent of PECO and ComEd and the other Exelon
subsidiaries and become the ultimate corporate parent of PSE&G and the
other PSEG subsidiaries.
Exelon would continue to be a registered public utility holding
company under the Act until the six months after August 8, 2005, the
date of enactment of the Energy Policy Act of 2005, and ComEd, PECO and
PSE&G would continue to be public utility subsidiary companies. Exelon
would remain headquartered in Chicago but would also have energy
trading and nuclear headquarters in southeastern Pennsylvania and
generation headquarters in Newark, New Jersey. PSE&G would remain
headquartered in Newark. PECO would remain headquartered in
Philadelphia and ComEd would remain headquartered in Chicago.
The Merger is subject to a number of conditions precedent,
including receipt by the parties of required state and federal
regulatory approvals and filing of pre-merger notification statements
under the Hart-Scott-Rodino Antitrust Improvements Act of 1976, as
amended (``HSR Act''), and the expiration or termination of the
statutory waiting period under that act. Applicants state that, the
boards of directors of Exelon and PSEG and the shareholders of PSEG
have approved the proposed Merger. Also, the shareholders of Exelon
have approved the issuance of shares of common stock by Exelon.
In addition to the changes resulting from the Merger Agreement, the
Applicants intend to revise their
[[Page 1570]]
corporate structure (the ``Exelon Generation Restructuring'').
Applicants state that, although their plans are not yet completely
finalized, they currently propose to implement the following changes,
subject to approval, as required, by the Commission. After obtaining
necessary approvals and third party consents, PSEG Power LLC (``PSEG
Power'') and its direct subsidiaries PSEG Nuclear LLC (``PSEG
Nuclear''), PSEG Fossil LLC (``PSEG Fossil'') and PSEG Energy Resources
& Trade LLC (``PSEG ER&T'') would all cease to exist as separate
entities and would become part of Exelon Generation. The business
functions of each of these former PSEG entities would become a part of
the respective Exelon Generation business unit. The Applicants
anticipate retaining the subsidiaries owned by these PSEG entities as
direct subsidiaries of Exelon Generation.
Also in connection with the Merger, PSE&G would become a direct
subsidiary of Delivery.\2\ The current subsidiaries of PSE&G would
remain intact. PSEG Holdings would become a subsidiary of Exelon, as
the successor to PSEG. The current subsidiaries of PSEG Holdings would
remain intact. PSEG Service Corporation (``PSEG Services'') would sell
all of its assets to Exelon Businesses Services Company (``Exelon
BSC''), change its name, and remain as a non-energy subsidiary. Exelon
BSC would be the sole ``service company'' of Exelon.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\2\ This would be accomplished through a contribution of the
common stock of PSE&G held by Exelon contemporaneously with the
Merger to Delivery or other appropriate corporate transaction.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Applicants' Mitigation Plan was approved by the Federal Energy
Regulatory Commission (``FERC'') in its ``Order Authorizing Merger
under section 203 of the Federal Power Act'' issued July 1, 2005
(``Merger Order'') based on, among other things, acceptance of a
proposal to divest, through the sale of plant or through the sale of
long-term firm energy rights, 6,600 MW of generation capacity
(``Mitigation Plan'') to mitigate any generation market concentration
concerns resulting from the Merger. The Mitigation Plan, according to
Applicants, calls for the divestiture by sale of 4000 MW of generation
capacity.\3\ The sale would occur within twelve (12) months following
close of the Merger. Applicants request Commission approval for the
disposition of this generating capacity because, as a result of the
Exelon Generation Restructuring, the subject generation capacity would
be owned by Exelon Generation, a public utility company under the Act.
The disposition of generation capacity owned by Exelon Generation, as
finally approved by FERC pursuant to post-Merger compliance filings
required to be made by Exelon under the FERC Merger Order (the ``Post-
Merger FERC Compliance Filings''), is referred to as the Generation
Divestiture.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\3\ As explained more fully below, on July 1, 2005, FERC
accepted a Mitigation Plan including the Generation Divestiture.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
In connection with consummation of the Generation Divestiture,
subsequent to the Exelon Generation Restructuring, the Applicants state
they would make further revisions to their corporate structure (the
``Divestiture Generation Restructurings'') in respect of the particular
electric generating units, or interests, being sold. The Post-Merger
FERC Compliance Filings would address the particular facts of the
Divestiture Generating Restructurings. The Exelon Generation
Restructuring, the Divestiture Generation Restructuring and the
Generation Divestiture are collectively called the ``Generation
Transactions.''
In addition to authorization of the Merger, the Exelon Generation
Restructuring, the Divestiture Generation Restructuring, and the
Generation Divestiture, Applicants request certain related approvals,
including:
1. Authorizations related to service company and other affiliate
transactions;
2. Issuance by Exelon of common stock in connection with the Merger
and employee and director compensation plans as described below;
3. Authorization of the consolidation (or replacement in lieu of
consolidation) of existing indebtedness and obligations of PSEG and its
subsidiaries as obligations of Exelon or its subsidiaries as a result
of the Merger;
4. Modifications to Exelon's existing omnibus financing authority
Holding Company Act Release No. 27830 (April 1, 2004) (the ``2004
Financing Order''); and
5. Approval of a section 11(e) plan in respect of the Generation
Transactions and related approvals as necessary or appropriate in
respect of the tax treatment afforded by section 1081 of the Internal
Revenue Code.
II. Description of Exelon and Its Subsidiaries
A. Exelon
Exelon was incorporated in Pennsylvania in February 1999. On
October 20, 2000, Exelon became the ultimate parent corporation for
PECO and ComEd, and registered pursuant to section 5 of the Act.
Exelon, through its subsidiaries, operates in two business
segments--Delivery and Generation--as described below. In addition to
Exelon's two business segments, Exelon BSC, a subsidiary of Exelon,
provides Exelon and its subsidiaries with financial, human resources,
legal, information technology, supply management and corporate
governance services, as well as direction and management of shared
functions for Delivery.
Delivery. Exelon's energy delivery business consists of the
purchase and sale of electricity and distribution and transmission
services by ComEd in northern Illinois and by PECO in southeastern
Pennsylvania and the purchase and sale of natural gas and distribution
services by PECO in the Pennsylvania counties surrounding the City of
Philadelphia.
Generation. Exelon's generation business consists of electric
generating facilities and energy marketing operations of Exelon
Generation, a 49.5% interest in two power stations in Mexico, and the
competitive retail sales business of Exelon Energy Company.
B. The Exelon Utility Subsidiaries
Exelon indirectly owns all of the issued and outstanding membership
interests of Exelon Generation, all the issued and outstanding common
stock of PECO and substantially all of the issued and outstanding
common stock of ComEd,\4\ and ComEd owns all the issued and outstanding
common stock of Commonwealth Edison Company of Indiana, Inc. (the
``Indiana Company'') (together, the ``Exelon Utility Subsidiaries'').
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\4\ In connection with the conversion of warrants and
convertible preferred stock that were outstanding prior to the 2000
merger of Unicom Corporation with PECO Energy Corp., a small number
of shares of common stock of ComEd (about 0.1% of the total
outstanding) are not owned by Exelon but are held by third parties.
See Exelon Corporation, Holding Co. Act Release No. 27256, note 4
(Oct. 19, 2000) (the ``2000 Merger Order'').
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
PECO is engaged principally in the purchase, transmission,
distribution and sale of electricity to residential, commercial and
industrial customers in southeastern Pennsylvania and in the purchase,
distribution and sale of natural gas to residential, commercial and
industrial customers in the Pennsylvania counties surrounding the City
of Philadelphia. PECO is subject to regulation by the Pennsylvania
Public Utility Commission (``PAPUC'') as to electric and gas rates, the
issuances of certain securities and certain other aspects of PECO's
operations. PECO is
[[Page 1571]]
also subject to regulation by FERC as to transmission rates, gas
pipelines and certain other aspects of its business.
PECO's retail service territory covers approximately 2,100 square
miles in southeastern Pennsylvania. PECO provides electric delivery
service in an area of approximately 2,000 square miles, with a
population of approximately 3.8 million, including 1.5 million in the
City of Philadelphia. Natural gas service is supplied in an
approximately 1,900 square mile area in southeastern Pennsylvania
adjacent to Philadelphia, with a population of approximately 2.3
million. PECO delivers electricity to approximately 1.5 million
customers and natural gas to approximately 460,000 customers.
ComEd is engaged principally in the purchase, transmission,
distribution and sale of electricity to a diverse base of residential,
commercial, industrial and wholesale customers in northern Illinois.
ComEd is subject to regulation by the Illinois Commerce Commission
(``ICC'') as to rates, the issuance of certain securities, and certain
other aspects of ComEd's operations. ComEd is also subject to
regulation by the FERC as to transmission rates and certain other
aspects of its business.
ComEd's retail service territory has an area of approximately
11,300 square miles and an estimated population of eight million. The
service territory includes the City of Chicago, an area of about 225
square miles with an estimated population of three million. ComEd has
approximately 3.7 million customers.
Electric utility restructuring legislation was adopted in
Pennsylvania in December 1996 and in Illinois in December 1997. Both
Illinois and Pennsylvania permit competition by alternative generation
suppliers for retail generation supply while transmission and
distribution services remain fully regulated. Both states, through
their regulatory agencies, established a phased approach for allowing
customers to choose an alternative electric generation supplier,
required rate reductions and imposed caps on rates during a transition
period, and allowed the collection of competitive transition charges
from customers to recover costs that might not otherwise be recovered
in a competitive market.
Effective as of January 1, 2001, Exelon effected a restructuring
that involved the transfer of the electric generating assets of ComEd
and PECO to Exelon Generation, a Pennsylvania limited liability company
and a public utility company engaged in the generation, sale and
purchase of electricity in Pennsylvania, Illinois and elsewhere and
also engaged in the trading of other energy and energy-related
commodities and development and ownership of exempt wholesale
generators (``EWGs'').
PJM Interconnection, L.L.C. (``PJM'') is the independent system
operator and the FERC-approved Regional Transmission Organization
(``RTO'') for the Mid-Atlantic and a portion of the Midwest. PJM is the
transmission provider under, and the administrator of, the PJM Open
Access Transmission Tariff, operates the PJM Interchange Energy Market
and Capacity Credit Markets, and conducts the day-to-day operations of
the bulk power system of the PJM region. ComEd's and PECO's
transmission systems are currently under the control of PJM and, by
order dated October 28, 2004 (Holding Co. Act Release No. 27904) (the
``PJM Order''), the Commission found that the electric utility
properties of the Exelon system satisfy the interconnection requirement
of section 2(a)(29)(A) of the Act by reason of PJM's operational
control of the transmission assets of ComEd and PECO.\5\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\5\ In the 2000 Merger Order the Commission found that the
electric utility operations of Exelon constituted a single,
integrated electric utility system, and that the gas utility
operations of Exelon constituted a single, integrated gas utility
system that was a permissible ``additional'' system under the
standards of section 2(a)(11) of the Act.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Both ComEd and PECO are public utility companies. ComEd is also a
holding company exempt from registration pursuant to section 3(a)(1) of
the Act, by reason of its ownership of the Indiana Company. Delivery is
an intermediate registered holding company and a first-tier subsidiary
of Exelon. Delivery owns all of the issued and outstanding common stock
of PECO and substantially all of the issued and outstanding common
stock of ComEd.
Exelon Generation is also an electric utility company. Exelon
Generation is a wholly owned subsidiary of Ventures, which is an
intermediate registered holding company and a first tier subsidiary of
Exelon. Ventures and Delivery are referred to as the ``Other Registered
Holding Companies.'' None of the Other Registered Holding Companies has
securities outstanding in the hands of the public.
C. Direct Non-Utility Subsidiaries of Exelon
Exelon has direct wholly owned non-utility subsidiaries as follows:
Exelon BSC, a service company, provides administrative, management
and technical services to Exelon and its associate companies;
Exelon Investment Holdings, LLC, an Illinois limited liability
company, is a holding company for tax-advantaged housing transactions;
UII, LLC, an Illinois limited liability company, is engaged in a
like-kind exchange transaction pursuant to which a portion of the
proceeds from the sale of ComEd's fossil generating stations was
invested in passive generating station leases with entities unrelated
to Exelon. The generating stations were leased back to such entities as
part of the transaction.\6\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\6\ Unicom Investment, Inc., an Illinois corporation, was
reorganized as an Illinois limited liability company, UII, LLC on
November 10, 2004.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Exelon has the following additional direct subsidiaries: Unicom
Assurance Company, Ltd., an inactive captive insurance company, Exelon
Capital Trust I, an inactive finance company, Exelon Capital Trust II,
an inactive finance company and Exelon Capital Trust III, an inactive
finance company.
D. Capitalization of Exelon
The total authorized shares of capital stock of Exelon consist of
(i) 1,200,000,000 shares of common stock, no par value and (ii)
100,000,000 shares of preferred stock, no par value. At the close of
business on December 31, 2004, 664,187,996 shares of Exelon common
stock were outstanding, and no shares of Exelon preferred stock were
issued and outstanding. In addition, at that date (i) 2,499,865 shares
of common stock were held by Exelon in its treasury, (ii) 25,205,285
shares of common stock were reserved for issuance pursuant to
outstanding options to purchase common stock granted under Exelon's
Long-Term Incentive Plan, Exelon's Amended and Restated Long-Term
Incentive Plan, as amended, and Exelon's 1998 Stock Option Plan
(together with Exelon's Directors' Stock Unit Plan, the ``Exelon Stock
Incentive Plans''), (iii) 14,777,078 shares of common stock were
reserved for the grant of additional awards under the Exelon Stock
Incentive Plans, (iv) 7,000,000 shares of common stock were reserved
for issuance pursuant to the Dividend Reinvestment and Stock Purchase
Plan, (v) 624,495 shares of common stock were reserved for issuance
pursuant to outstanding performance shares, (vi) 216,000 shares of
common stock were reserved for issuance pursuant to outstanding units
under Exelon's Directors' Stock Unit Plan, (vii) 5,357,745 shares of
common stock were reserved for issuance under Exelon's Employee Stock
Purchase Plan, (viii) 1,060,053 shares of common stock were reserved
for issuance pursuant to
[[Page 1572]]
outstanding restricted shares (shares of common stock subject to
forfeiture) and (ix) 1,336,516 shares of common stock were reserved for
issuance pursuant to outstanding deferred shares (shares of common
stock the issuance of which has been deferred pursuant to Exelon's
Deferred Compensation Plan).
As of December 31, 2004, Exelon's capitalization on a consolidated
basis was as follows: Common Equity (includes Retained Earnings)
40.79%; Minority Interest 0.18%; Preferred and Preference Stock 2.74%;
Securitization Obligations 20.76%; Long-Term Debt 31.56%; Current
Maturities of Long-Term Debt 1.85%; Total Long-Term Debt 33.41%; Short-
Term Debt 2.12%.
III. Description of PSEG and Its Subsidiaries
A. PSEG
PSEG was incorporated under the laws of the State of New Jersey in
1985 and is a section 3(a)(1) exempt public utility holding company.
PSEG, through its subsidiaries, operates in three business segments--
Delivery, Generation and Enterprises, as described below. In addition
to PSEG's three business segments, PSEG Services, a subsidiary of PSEG,
provides PSEG and its subsidiaries with financial, human resources,
legal, information technology, supply management and corporate
governance services.
Delivery--PSEG's domestic energy delivery business consists of the
transmission and distribution of electric energy and gas in New Jersey
through PSE&G.
Generation--PSEG's generation businesses consist of the owned and
contracted for electric generation facilities and energy marketing
operations of the PSEG Power subsidiaries and the PSEG Global LLC
(``PSEG Global'') subsidiaries. PSEG Power has three principal direct
wholly owned subsidiaries: PSEG Nuclear, PSEG Fossil and PSEG ER&T. The
PSEG Power generation portfolio consists of approximately 14,607 MW of
generation in the Northeast and Midwest. PSEG Global has equity
ownership interests in approximately 2,404 MW of generation in North
America. All the generation assets in the PSEG system are held by PSEG
subsidiaries with EWG or foreign utility company (``FUCO'') status
under the Act or qualifying facility (``QF'') status under the Public
Utility Regulatory Policies Act of 1978, as amended (``PURPA'').
Enterprises--PSEG's enterprise businesses consist primarily of (1)
investments in energy-related financial transactions, leveraged leases,
operating leases, leveraged buyout funds, marketable securities and a
demand-side management business and (2) investments in international
generation and delivery businesses qualified as EWGs and foreign
utility companies through PSEG Resources LLC (``PSEG Resources'') and
through PSEG Global.
B. The PSEG Utility Subsidiary
PSE&G is a public utility company subsidiary of PSEG. PSE&G is an
electric and gas utility company engaged principally in the
transmission and distribution of electric energy and gas in New Jersey.
PSE&G is subject to extensive regulation by the New Jersey Board of
Public Utilities (``NJBPU'') as to electric and gas rates, the issuance
of securities and certain other aspects of PSE&G's operations. PSE&G is
also subject to regulation by the FERC as to electric transmission
rates and certain other aspects of its business.
PSE&G's retail service territory covers a corridor of approximately
2,600 square miles running diagonally across New Jersey from Bergen
County in the northeast to an area below the city of Camden in the
southwest with a population of approximately 5.5 million. PSE&G
provides service to approximately 2.0 million electric customers and
approximately 1.6 million gas customers.
PSE&G does not own or operate any electric generation facilities.
PSE&G, as a result of an order of the NJBPU issued under the provisions
of the New Jersey Electric Discount and Energy Competition Act
(``EDECA''), transferred all of its electric generation facilities,
plant, equipment and wholesale power trading contracts to its affiliate
PSEG ER&T in August 2000. Also, under an NJBPU order, PSE&G transferred
its gas supply business, including its inventories and supply
contracts, to PSEG ER&T in May 2002. PSE&G continues to own and operate
its electric transmission and electric and gas distribution business.
PSE&G has transferred functional control over its electric transmission
facilities to PJM.
All electric and gas customers in New Jersey have the ability to
choose an electric energy and/or gas supplier. For those retail
electric customers located in New Jersey who do not choose a
competitive electric supplier, New Jersey's Electric Distribution
Companies (``EDCs''), including PSE&G, provide basic generation service
(``BGS'') or provider of last resort service (``POLR''). The EDCs
satisfy their BGS obligations through a competitive state-wide annual
auction. PSE&G's affiliate PSEG ER&T, has historically been a
successful participant in these auctions and serves several EDCs
including PSE&G.
For those retail gas customers located in New Jersey who do not
choose a competitive natural gas supplier, New Jersey's gas
distribution companies, including PSE&G, provide basic gas supply
service (``BGSS'') or POLR. PSE&G has entered into a full requirements
contract through 2007 with PSEG ER&T to meet the supply requirements of
PSE&G's gas customers.\7\ PSEG ER&T charges PSE&G for the gas commodity
costs, which PSE&G recovers from its customers. Any difference between
rates charged by PSEG ER&T under the BGSS contract and rates charged to
PSE&G's customers are deferred and collected or refunded through future
adjustments in retail rates.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\7\ The BGSS contract continues year to year thereafter unless
terminated by either party consistent with its terms.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
PSE&G's natural gas facilities consist entirely of local gas
distribution facilities in the State of New Jersey and neither PSE&G
nor any other PSEG company owns any interstate natural gas facilities
subject to the Natural Gas Act.
C. Direct Non-Utility Subsidiaries of PSEG
PSEG has three direct wholly owned non-utility subsidiaries, PSEG
Power, PSEG Holdings and PSEG Services.
PSEG Power has three principal direct wholly owned subsidiaries:
PSEG Nuclear, which owns and operates nuclear generating stations; PSEG
Fossil, which develops, owns and operates domestic fossil generating
stations and other non-nuclear generating stations; and PSEG ER&T,
which markets the capacity and production of PSEG Fossil's and PSEG
Nuclear's stations, manages the commodity price risks and market risks
related to generation and markets electricity, capacity, ancillary
services and natural gas products on a wholesale basis. PSEG Power also
provides specialized maintenance, repair and plant engineering services
on energy-related electro-mechanical equipment to its affiliates. PSEG
Nuclear and PSEG Fossil are both EWGs.
PSEG ER&T conducts energy trading operations and does not own any
utility assets. PSEG ER&T is subject to regulation by FERC as to its
wholesale electric sales and certain other aspects of its business. As
explained below, it is contemplated that PSEG ER&T will be merged into
Exelon Generation.
PSEG Holdings has two principal subsidiaries: PSEG Resources, which
[[Page 1573]]
invests primarily in energy-related, financial transactions, and PSEG
Global, which invests in international generation and delivery
businesses qualified as EWGs and FUCOs and domestic generation
qualified as EWGs and QFs.\8\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\8\ Neither PSEG Holdings nor any of its subsidiaries is a
public utility company for purposes of the 1935 Act. PSEG Holdings
and its subsidiaries are more fully described in Exhibit G-7
attached to the Application.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
PSEG Resources has investments in energy-related financial
transactions and assets including leveraged leases, operating leases,
leveraged buyout funds, limited partnerships and marketable securities.
PSEG Resources also engages in demand side management services in New
Jersey through its subsidiaries.
PSEG Global, through various subsidiaries qualified as FUCOs and
EWGs, has investments in electric generation, transmission and
distribution facilities in selected international markets and through
various subsidiaries qualified as EWGS and QFs, has investments in
electric generation in selected domestic markets. PSEG Global's
domestic generation assets are located in California, Pennsylvania,
Texas, New Hampshire and Hawaii.
PSEG Services is a non-utility service company. As explained below,
it is contemplated that PSEG Services will sell all of its assets to
Exelon BSC, change its name, and remain as a subsidiary.
As of December 31, 2004, PSEG's consolidated capitalization was as
follows: Common Equity (includes Retained Earnings) 29.03%; Preferred
and Preference Stock 6.48%; Securitization Obligations 10.55%; Long-
Term Debt 49.50%; Current Maturities of Long-Term Debt 1.21%; Total
Long-Term Debt 50.71%; Short-Term Debt 3.23%.
IV. Principal Terms of the Merger Agreement
A. Generally
The Merger Agreement provides for a business combination whereby
PSEG will be merged with and into Exelon, with Exelon surviving. At the
effective time of and as a result of the Merger, (i) each outstanding
share of PSEG common stock will be converted into the right to receive
1.225 shares of Exelon common stock (the ``Exchange Ratio'') and (ii)
each share of Exelon common stock will remain outstanding. All
outstanding PSEG stock options will be converted into options to
purchase the number of shares of Exelon common stock determined by
multiplying (a) the number of shares of PSEG common stock subject to
such stock option immediately prior to the effective time by (b) the
Exchange Ratio, at an exercise price per share of Exelon common stock
equal to the exercise price per share of PSEG common stock under such
stock option immediately prior to the effective time divided by the
Exchange Ratio.
Following the effective time of the Merger, the surviving
corporation, which will be renamed Exelon Electric & Gas Corporation,
will have an eighteen-member board of directors, which will include
twelve Exelon directors and six new members nominated by PSEG.
Applicants state that Exelon and PSEG have made customary
representations, warranties and covenants in the Merger Agreement,
including, among others, covenants (i) by PSEG not to (a) solicit
proposals relating to alternative business combination transactions or
(b) subject to certain exceptions, enter into discussions concerning
alternative business combination transactions, (ii) by Exelon and PSEG
to cause shareholder meetings to be held to consider approval of the
Merger and related transactions, (iii) subject to PSEG's right to
terminate the Merger Agreement to accept a superior proposal (as
described in the Merger Agreement), for the board of directors of PSEG
to recommend adoption and approval by PSEG's shareholders of the Merger
Agreement and related transactions and (iv) for the board of directors
of Exelon to recommend approval by Exelon's shareholders of the
issuance of shares of Exelon contemplated by the Merger Agreement
subject to Exelon's board of directors' right to change its
recommendation as required by its fiduciary duties.
Consummation of the Merger is subject to various conditions,
including the requisite approval by the shareholders of Exelon and
PSEG, respectively, no legal impediment to the Merger, the receipt of
required regulatory approvals, the absence of a material adverse effect
on Exelon, PSEG or, prospectively, the surviving corporation and the
absence of certain specified burdensome actions as a condition to the
regulatory approvals for the Merger. The Merger Agreement contains
certain termination rights for both Exelon and PSEG, and further
provides that, upon termination of the Merger Agreement, a termination
fee may be payable under specified circumstances including (i) if
Exelon enters into a definitive agreement to be acquired, it must pay
PSEG a termination fee of $400 million plus PSEG's transaction expenses
up to $40 million, (ii) if Exelon's board of directors changes its
recommendation, it must pay PSEG's transactions expenses up to $40
million and (iii) if PSEG's board of directors changes its
recommendation or if PSEG enters into a definitive agreement for a
superior proposal to be acquired it must pay Exelon a termination fee
of $400 million plus Exelon's transaction expenses up to $40 million.
B. Accounting Treatment for the Merger
Applicants state that the Merger would be accounted for under the
purchase method of accounting, the assets and liabilities of PSEG would
be recorded, as of completion of the Merger, at their respective fair
values and added to those of Exelon. The reported financial condition
and results of operations of Exelon issued after completion of the
Merger would reflect PSEG's balances and results after completion of
the Merger, but would not be restated retroactively to reflect the
historical financial position or results of operations of PSEG.
Following completion of the Merger, the earnings of the combined
company would reflect purchase accounting adjustments, including
changes to amortization and depreciation expense for acquired assets.
C. Operation of the Combined System Post-Merger
Following the Merger, ComEd, PECO and PSE&G (the ``Retail Utility
Subsidiaries'') would all be subsidiaries of Delivery and would operate
their respective electric distribution systems, and PECO and PSE&G
would operate their respective gas distribution systems. The electric
transmission systems of the Retail Utility Subsidiaries together with
the Indiana Company would be interconnected through and subject to the
functional control of a single operator, PJM. The Retail Utility
Subsidiaries, the Indiana Company and Exelon Generation are referred to
as the ``Utility Subsidiaries.''
Applicants assert that the combination of the electric utility
operations of the Utility Subsidiaries would result in a single,
integrated electric utility system. In addition, the combination of
PSE&G's gas utility properties with those of PECO would comprise a
single integrated gas utility system that may be retained by Exelon as
an additional system under the standards of section 11. Applicants note
that in the alternative, the Commission could find that each of the
PECO and PSE&G gas systems is a separate
[[Page 1574]]
integrated public utility system and that the PSE&G gas system is a
retainable additional system under the standards of section 11.
V. Exelon Generation Restructuring
After obtaining necessary approvals and third party consents,
Applicants state that PSEG Power and PSEG Fossil would cease to exist
as separate entities and would become part of Exelon Generation.
Applicants state that the Generation Transactions are predicated on the
assumption that the Exelon Generation Restructuring would precede the
Divestiture Generation Restructuring and the Generation Divestiture.
After obtaining any appropriate third-party consents, including
consents of certain PSEG Power debt holders to certain amendments of
PSEG Power debt agreements, the Applicants would undertake the Exelon
Generation Restructuring such that PSEG Power and its direct
subsidiaries PSEG Nuclear, PSEG Fossil and PSEG ER&T would all cease to
exist as separate entities and would become part of Exelon Generation.
The business functions of these former PSEG entities would become a
part of their respective Exelon Generation business unit. The
subsidiaries owned by these PSEG entities would be retained as direct
subsidiaries of Exelon Generation, which would continue to be an
electric utility company. It is contemplated that the Exelon Generation
Restructuring would take place contemporaneously with the closing of
the Merger.\9\ Applicants seek approval for the Exelon Generation
Restructuring.\10\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\9\ Applicants anticipate that the current subsidiaries of PSEG
Fossil that own and/or operate electric generation facilities would
remain subsidiaries of Exelon Generation as EWGs. The Exelon
Generation Restructuring would not result in any new ``public
utility'' subsidiary of Exelon Generation.
\10\ Applicants state that FERC has granted approvals related to
the Exelon Generation Restructuring. The Applicants state that the
New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection (``NJDEP'') has
determined that the Industrial Site Recovery Act (``ISRA'') does not
apply to the Merger and its related corporate reorganizations
including the Generation Restructuring. Filings have also been made
with the Connecticut Siting Council (the ``Siting Counsel'') and the
Connecticut Department of Environmental Protection (``CDEP'') with
respect to the implications of the Merger and the Generation
Restructuring to the generating stations located in Connecticut and
owned by a subsidiary of PSEG Fossil. The Siting Counsel has
approved the Merger and CDEP approval will be sought closer to the
expected time of the Merger (CDEP approvals are valid only for
ninety days).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
VI. Exelon Generation Divestiture
The Merger would increase the total capacity of generation
resources owned or controlled by Exelon. To ensure that the combined
company does not have market power in any relevant market, the
Applicants state that Exelon and PSEG have proposed the Mitigation Plan
designed to address in full FERC's requirements for competitive
markets. As part of the plan, the companies have proposed the
Generation Divestiture--to divest a number of coal, mid-merit, and
peaking generating plants. The Mitigation Plan also provides for the
transfer of control of the output of a portion of their baseload
nuclear generating capacity.
Applicants state that Exelon Generation owns or controls all of the
Exelon system's generating assets including the electric generating
units that are subject to divestiture as part of the Generation
Divestiture. Applicants propose to effect the Generation Divestiture
pursuant to a voluntary plan under section 11(e) of the Act.
PSEG Fossil is an EWG and is a wholly-owned subsidiary of PSEG
Power. PSEG Fossil owns directly the electric generating units that are
subject to being divested as part of the Generation Divestiture.
The final divestiture proposal made by Applicants and approved by
FERC in the Merger Order would result in Applicants divesting 6,600 MW
of capacity. Of this, 4,000 MW would be physically divested fossil
generation. Under the Merger Order, Applicants are required to make a
compliance filing at FERC within 30 days of the completion of their
physical divestiture, providing an analysis of the Merger's effect on
competition in energy and capacity markets, given actual plants and
assets divested and the actual acquirers of the divested assets. If the
analysis shows that the Merger's harm to competition has not been
sufficiently mitigated, Applicants must propose additional mitigation
at that time. The divestiture of the 4,000 MW contemplated in the
Merger Order plus any subsequent physical divestiture ordered by FERC
as necessary additional mitigation is referred to as the Generation
Divestiture.
Rather than divest their nuclear baseload units, Applicants have
proposed, and FERC has accepted, a ``virtual divestiture'' whereby they
would divest, through sales of long-term firm energy rights, 2,600 MW
of nuclear generating capacity in PJM East. According to the
Applicants, such ``virtual divestiture'' would take the form of FERC
jurisdictional wholesale power transactions, would not constitute the
disposition of ``utility assets'' within the meaning of the Act, and
therefore, no approval by the Commission would be required for the
virtual divestiture.
Exhibit G-4 to the Application is a listing of generation
facilities subject to divestiture as initially proposed by Exelon and
PSEG (1,000 MW of peaking capacity and a total of 1,900 MW of mid-merit
capacity of which 550 MW would be coal-fired). Subsequent to filing the
Application, the proposed Generation Divestiture was expanded by an
additional 1,100 MW for the total divestiture as approved in the Merger
Order of 6,600 MW as noted above and certain other generation
facilities were added to the list subject to divestiture. See Exhibit
G-4.1 for the final list of the facilities that may be subject to the
Generation Divestiture.
The Merger Order requires Applicants to execute sales agreements
and make appropriate filings at FERC within twelve (12) months of the
Closing of the Merger in order to implement the Generation Divestiture.
The Applicants state that they intend to commence the divestiture
process more quickly, but that 12 months may be necessary to conduct a
sales process, negotiate all necessary agreements and file for all
necessary regulatory approvals.
Applicants state that FERC approved the Merger based upon, among
other things, the Mitigation Plan. Applicants request that the
Commission make the necessary findings to support relief pursuant to
section 1081 of the Internal Revenue Code with respect to the
Generation Transactions. The Applicants state that none of the proposed
mitigation, including the Generation Divestiture, would adversely
affect the integration of the combined electric utility operations for
purposes of the Act.
VII. Divestiture Generation Restructuring
In order to maximize the amount a buyer would be willing to pay for
the Subject Assets, defined below, the Applicants state that they are
considering alternative options for effecting the disposition by sale
of the electric generating assets listed in Exhibit G-10 to the
Application (the ``Subject Assets''), as required by the Generation
Divestiture. Subsequent to the Merger but prior to the implementation
of any of the options set forth below, the Applicants state that Exelon
would cause the assets listed in Exhibit G-11 to the Application to be
transferred to Exelon Generation (``Consolidating Transfers'').
Pursuant to Option 2 described below, an internal restructuring would
occur immediately prior to the disposition of the Subject Assets to the
buyer that would change the ownership structure of the Subject Assets.
The particular tax characteristics
[[Page 1575]]
of the sale of a generating unit, including the buyer's desired
business and tax structures, would determine which option would be
utilized. Because there are likely to be multiple buyers of the Subject
Assets (each buyer a ``Third Party''), the Applicants may utilize
either of the disposition options described below to effectuate the
sale of the Subject Assets to each Third Party (the disposition to each
Third Party is referred to as a ``Divestiture Transaction''). Each of
the Subject Assets would be acquired pursuant to each Divestiture
Transaction in exchange for cash and/or notes (the ``Transfer
Consideration'').
Option 1: Exelon Generation would sell each of the assets listed in
Exhibit G-13 of the Application to a Third Party pursuant to the
Divestiture Transaction in exchange for the Transfer Consideration.
Exelon Generation may distribute to Exelon, through Ventures, the
Transfer Consideration received.
Option 2: Exelon Generation would sell, in exchange for an amount
of cash equal to the Transfer Consideration each of the assets listed
in Exhibit G-14 to the Application to the corporation wholly-owned by
Ventures that is listed as the ``Acquiring Sub'' next to that asset in
Exhibit G-14. Exelon Generation may distribute to Exelon (via Ventures)
the cash received. Ventures would then sell all of the interests in the
Acquiring Sub to the Third Party in exchange for the Transfer
Consideration.
The particulars of the option selected for each Divestiture
Transaction would be specified in the applicable Post-Merger FERC
Compliance Filing. Applicants state that each of the steps outlined in
Option 2 could occur simultaneously.
VIII. Section 1081 Recitals
Applicants state that Internal Revenue Code section 1081(d)
provides for the nonrecognition of gain or loss from certain
intercompany transactions between members of the same system group if
such transactions are made in obedience to a Commission order.
Applicants request that the order on this Application: (i) Recite
that the sale or disposition of generating units as part of the
Generation Transactions is necessary or appropriate to the integration
or simplification of the post-Merger Exelon holding company system and
to effectuate the provisions of section 11(b); and (ii) require post-
Merger Exelon to take appropriate actions to cause its direct and
indirect subsidiaries, as the case may be, to complete the Generation
Divestiture as required in order to comply with the Merger Order.
IX. Affiliate Transactions
A. Service Company Transactions
Applicants state that, under the 2000 Merger Order, the Commission
authorized Exelon to organize and capitalize Exelon BSC as a service
company subsidiary, and authorized Exelon BSC to provide ComEd, PECO
and other companies in the Exelon system with administrative,
management, engineering, construction, environmental, and other support
services pursuant to a General Services Agreement.
Further, Exelon filed a post-effective amendment in File No. 70-
9645 describing its accounting systems and cost allocation
methodologies and request a supplemental order of the Commission, as
required by the 2000 Merger Order. On October 31, 2003, Exelon
submitted a 60-day letter that, as supplemented, described certain
proposed changes in allocation methods for ``corporate governance
costs,'' and the reorganization of Energy Delivery Shared Services, a
business unit of Exelon BSC that would begin to provide new services to
ComEd and PECO effective January 1, 2004.\11\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\11\ Under the 2000 Merger Order, Exelon BSC is required to give
written notice to the Commission at least 60 days prior to
implementing any change in the type and character of the companies
receiving services, the methods of allocating costs to associate
companies, or the scope or character of services to be rendered.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
In connection with the Merger, the Applicants state that PSEG
Services would sell all of its assets to Exelon BSC, change its name
and remain as a subsidiary. Post-Merger, Exelon BSC intends to add the
former PSEG companies as client companies under the General Services
Agreement and would provide to the new client companies the same
administrative, management, and technical services that it now provides
to Exelon system companies, utilizing the same work order procedures
and the same methods of allocating costs that are specified in the
General Services Agreement.\12\ In connection with the Transaction,
certain employees of PSEG Services may be transferred to and become
employees of Exelon BSC, which would be the sole subsidiary service
company for the Exelon system.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\12\ Exelon and PSE&G are seeking approval of the General
Services Agreement from the NJBPU.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Exelon requests that the Commission find, that Exelon BSC would
continue to be organized and conducted in accordance with section 13(b)
of the Act. Applicants request authority to delay the full
implementation of all services and systems relative to the new PSEG
clients until after February 8, 2006.
B. Other Inter-Company Goods and Services At Cost
1. Incidental Services
The 2000 Merger Order recognized that ComEd, PECO and Exelon
Generation may provide services incidental to their utility businesses,
such as infrastructure services and storm outage emergency repairs, to
one another and other associate companies in accordance with rules 87,
90 and 91. Accordingly, Applicants propose that, following the Merger,
PSE&G also may provide these incidental services to, or receive these
incidental services from, the other Exelon companies. PSE&G also may
provide goods, through a leasing arrangement or otherwise, to one or
more associate companies, and may use certain assets for the benefit of
one or more associate companies.
2. Services Required for the Efficient Operation of Exelon Generation's
Businesses
Under the 2000 Merger Order, the Commission authorized Exelon
Generation and any future subsidiary of Exelon Generation and AmerGen
Energy Company, LLC (``AmerGen'') to provide services at cost to each
other as required for the efficient operation of the Exelon system
generating facilities. Although Exelon Generation is an ``electric
utility company'' under the Act, it is not subject to state rate
regulation and has no ``captive'' customers. Following the Merger, as
is the case now, Exelon Generation would own and operate generating
facilities, engage in energy marketing and trading, and invest in and
own exempt wholesale generators, intermediate companies and other
permitted investments such as Rule 58 energy-related companies, all of
which are operated as an integral part of its system generating
facilities. Accordingly, Exelon Generation proposes that post-Merger
it, and all of its current and future subsidiaries, including the
former PSEG subsidiaries, provide services at cost to each other.
3. Services at the Interface Between Generation and Transmission and
Distribution
Under the 2000 Merger Order, the Commission authorized Exelon
Generation to render and receive services at cost from ComEd and PECO
related to the interface--primarily switchyard facilities--between the
generation function of Exelon Generation and the transmission and
distribution functions of ComEd and
[[Page 1576]]
PECO. Applicants request authorization for ComEd, PECO, PSE&G, Exelon
Generation and its subsidiaries to render and receive the same types of
services at cost, among each other following the Merger.
4. Exelon Generation Services in Connection With Supply of Electricity
and Natural Gas
a. Scheduling Coordination Agreements. Applicants state that PSE&G
is obligated to purchase electricity from certain QFs, is obligated to
purchase electricity from certain EWGs under restructured former PURPA
contracts, and receives an allocation of hydroelectric power from the
St. Lawrence Power Project. Further, that under a stipulation filed at
the NJBPU, PSE&G is obligated to resell this power at wholesale into
the PJM spot market. As PSE&G owns no generation and engages in no
other wholesale energy transactions, it relies upon its affiliate PSEG
ER&T to schedule these transactions on its behalf and to submit bids
for capacity as directed by PSE&G. PSEG ER&T also fulfills certain
billing and accounting functions with respect to such energy and
capacity. These services are provided under two agreements
(``Scheduling Coordination Agreements'') pursuant to which PSE&G
receives the full PJM market value for the electricity. PSE&G either
(i) pays PSEG ER&T a cost-based fee, or (ii) enables PSEG ER&T to
receive a credit from PJM for capacity from the purchases described
above against any emergency power it would otherwise have to pay for
under the PJM Open Access Transmission Tariff. The Applicants represent
that the Scheduling Coordination Agreements will be assumed by Exelon
Generation by operation of law.
b. BGSS Gas Contract. The Applicants state that PSEG ER&T provides
full-requirements gas supply service to PSE&G pursuant to a contract
approved by the NJBPU for the purpose of satisfying all of PSE&G's
retail gas service obligations (``BGSS Gas Contract''). As part of the
transaction approved by the NJBPU, PSEG ER&T assumed the PSE&G
entitlements under most of its gas transportation and storage contracts
with interstate pipelines. In a few cases, the entitlements remained
with PSE&G and PSEG ER&T administers the contracts as PSE&G's agent.
The Applicants state that the BGSS Gas Contract will be assumed by
Exelon Generation by operation of law.
Under the 2000 Merger Order, the Commission authorized Exelon
Generation to provide, at cost, supply planning services and assistance
to ComEd and PECO and to assist the utilities in obtaining energy
supply resources from unaffiliated sellers, in each case in connection
with the utility's unbundled retail sales and/or wholesale sales, to
the extent that energy supply is not provided by Exelon Generation.
Applicants state that the Retail Utility Subsidiaries might require
assistance from Exelon Generation with respect to the procurement
process for the procurement of energy for the utilities' bundled as
well as unbundled retail sales. For this reason, and also to allow
Exelon Generation to provide any jurisdictional services currently
provided by PSEG ER&T pursuant to the Scheduling Coordination
Agreements and the BGSS Gas Contract, the Applicants request that the
authorization obtained in the 2000 Merger Order be modified not only to
include PSE&G, but also to relate to the Retail Utility Subsidiaries'
bundled retail sales, as well as unbundled retail sales and/or
wholesale sales, of both electricity and natural gas. Thus, the
Applicants request that the Commission authorize Exelon Generation to
provide, at cost, supply planning services and assistance to the Retail
Utility Subsidiaries and to assist the utilities in obtaining, or
disposing of, energy supply resources from unaffiliated sellers, in
each case in connection with the Retail Utility Subsidiaries' bundled
and unbundled retail sales and/or wholesale sales, to the extent that
energy supply is not provided by Exelon Generation.\13\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\13\ Applicants state that the described services will be
provided at cost, with the exception of some services under the
Scheduling Coordination Agreements, which provide, as an alternate
mechanism for PSE&G to compensate PSEG ER&T (Exelon Generation after
the Exelon Generation Restructuring) for scheduling coordination
services, for PSEG ER&T to receive a credit from PJM for capacity.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
5. Modification of Intercompany Services Authorized by the 2000 Merger
Order
Applicants state that ComEd currently provides to and receives from
affiliates certain services in accordance with an Affiliated Interests
Agreement (``ComEd AIA'') approved by the ICC. PECO's form of Mutual
Services Agreement (``PECO MSA'') under which PECO provides and
receives certain services from affiliates has been approved by the
PAPUC. In connection with the Merger, Applicants state that PSE&G plans
to enter into a Mutual Services Agreement (the ``PSE&G MSA'') to govern
affiliated interest transactions between PSE&G and its affiliates at
cost, consistent with Rules 90 and 91.\14\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\14\ Exelon and PSE&G are seeking approval of the PSE&G MSA from
the NJBPU.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Applicants state that the 2000 Merger Order approved individual
contracts pursuant to which ComEd and PECO received or rendered
services at other than cost. Further, that those arrangements or
contracts have all either concluded, or are being conducted currently
at cost. Exelon proposes to modify the service providers and recipients
under the types of services so described in the 2000 Merger Order so
that each of ComEd, PECO, PSE&G and Exelon Generation may provide, at
cost, the listed services to associate companies in the new Exelon
system under the same conditions as currently apply to the Exelon
system companies.\15\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\15\ Such services include: services provided by the Retail
Utility Subsidiaries: regulatory and legislative services, call
center, central mail, fleet services, real estate and facilities,
distribution technical services, telephone overflow coverage,
strategic marketing and sourcing, installation and maintenance of
substation equipment, purchase of materials and logistics, metering
equipment and rubber goods, customer services rep emergency
training, environmental and lab services, training for electrical
and fire; and services provided by Exelon Generation: instrument
calibration, operation of Richmond Frequency Converters and
synchronous condenser maintenance.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
In addition to the services authorized by the 2000 Merger Order,
Applicants request authorization for the following additional services
to be provided at cost. These services would also be subject to the
reporting requirements discussed above:
(a) PowerLabs Services to ComEd, PECO and PSE&G. Exelon Generation
was authorized to provide Instrument Calibration services to PECO and,
since the time of the 2000 Merger Order, has done so through Exelon
PowerLabs, LLC (``PowerLabs''), a first-tier Rule 58 subsidiary of
Exelon Generation. PowerLabs also provides Instrument Calibration and
other technical services at cost, pursuant to Rule 87(b)(1), to Exelon
BSC, which passes them through, at cost, to ComEd and PECO. Applicants
request that PowerLabs be authorized to provide Instrument Calibration
and other technical services, (including component testing and failure
analysis) at cost, directly to ComEd, PECO and PSE&G, in addition to
Exelon Generation.
(b) Energy Efficiency Audit Services by the Retail Utility
Subsidiaries to Other Exelon Companies. ComEd Technical Services
performs site efficiency assessments, which review current energy use
profiles and identify cost-savings opportunities (``Energy Efficiency
Audit Services''). ComEd has
[[Page 1577]]
provided a small volume of these services at cost to Exelon Generation
and PECO under Rules 87, 90 and 91. Applicants request the Retail
Utility Subsidiaries be authorized to provide Energy Efficiency Audit
Services to other companies in the Exelon system at cost.
(c) Exelon Generation Maintenance, Repair and Plant Engineering
Services. PSEG Power provides a range of specialized maintenance,
repair and plant engineering services on energy-related electro-
mechanical equipment. PSEG Power provides these services to PSEG Fossil
and its EWG subsidiaries, as well as to PSEG Nuclear, PSE&G and PSEG
Services. PSEG Power charges its affiliates a blended hourly rate that
recovers the fully allocated cost of providing these services. PSEG
Power charges PSE&G approximately $3.4 million on an annual basis for
the services it provides to PSE&G. PSEG Power charges PSEG Fossil's EWG
subsidiaries approximately $150,000 on an annual basis for the services
it provides to these entities. After the Exelon Generation
Restructuring, PSEG Power will be part of Exelon Generation. Thus,
Applicants request authorization for Exelon Generation to provide these
services, at cost, to other Exelon companies, including, PSE&G, Exelon
BSC, ComEd and PECO.
(d) Peak Shaving Services. To facilitate PSEG ER&T's provision of
BGSS to PSE&G, PSE&G provides a peaking natural gas supply to PSEG ER&T
from three Liquefied Propane Air (``LPA'') Plants and one Liquefied
Natural Gas (``LNG'') Plant. PSE&G charges PSEG ER&T for all labor,
material and other costs that are required to operate and maintain the
facilities along with a carrying cost for the return on and
depreciation of the investment. Applicants request authorization for
PSE&G to provide these peak shaving services to Exelon Generation, as
successor to PSEG ER&T and for PECO to provide similar peak shaving
services to Exelon Generation, in the event PECO enters into similar
arrangements with Exelon Generation.
(e) All services required to manage and operate the facilities of
the Indiana Company are provided by either Exelon BSC or ComEd. Exelon
BSC has authority to provide the services it currently provides to the
Indiana Company. To date, ComEd has provided, at cost, incidental
services in connection with operation and maintenance of the Indiana
Company's transmission assets, as well as various administrative and
managerial services. Applicants request that ComEd be authorized to
provide operation and maintenance services and administrative and
managerial services, at cost, to the Indiana Company on an ongoing
basis.
X. Issuance of Common Stock in the Merger
Exelon requests approval to issue that number of shares of its
common stock necessary to comply with its obligations under the Merger
Agreement. Exelon expects that it would issue approximately 341 million
shares of common stock to the former holders of PSEG common stock in
the Merger. This includes approximately 14 million shares of common
stock, or options on its common stock, that Exelon would be required to
issue at the consummation of the Merger to satisfy the obligations
under various PSEG stock option and employee benefit plans.
Upon completion of the Merger, each outstanding option to purchase
shares of PSEG common stock would be assumed by Exelon and substituted
with an option to purchase shares of Exelon common stock, exercisable
on generally the same terms and conditions that applied before the
Merger. The number of shares of Exelon common stock subject to the
substitute Exelon stock option would equal the number of shares of PSEG
common stock subject to the PSEG stock option immediately prior to
completion of the Merger, multiplied by the exchange ratio, rounded
down to the nearest whole share. The per share exercise price of each
substitute Exelon stock option would equal the exercise price of the
PSEG stock option immediately prior to completion of the Merger divided
by the exchange ratio, rounded up to the nearest whole cent. In
addition, upon completion of the Merger, Exelon would assume all PSEG
equity-based awards and substitute them with equity-based awards with
respect to shares of Exelon common stock on generally the same terms
and conditions that applied before completion of the Merger. The number
of shares of Exelon common stock issuable under those awards, and the
exercise prices for those awards, would be adjusted to take into
account the exchange ratio (1.225) in the Merger.
XI. PSEG Indebtedness Assumed
As a consequence of the Merger and the Exelon Generation
Restructuring, all the existing consolidated indebtedness of PSEG would
become consolidated indebtedness of Exelon. As the surviving entity in
the Merger, Exelon would become the su