In the Matter of Certain Personal Computer/Consumer Electronic Convergent Devices, Components Thereof, and Products Containing Same; Notice of Investigation, 363-364 [E5-8258]

Download as PDF Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 2 / Wednesday, January 4, 2006 / Notices Notice of availability of the Draft General Management Plan and Draft Environmental Impact Statement for Manassas National Battlefield Park, Virginia (GMP/EIS). wwhite on PROD1PC61 with NOTICES ACTION: SUMMARY: Pursuant to section 102(2)(C) of the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969, Public Law 91–190, as amended; 42 United States Code 4332(C), the National Park Service (NPS) announces the availability of the GMP/EIS. The General Management Plan will guide management decisions related to cultural and natural resources, visitation, and park development for the next 15 to 20 years. DATES: The GMP/EIS will remain available for public review for 60 days following publication of the notice of availability in the Federal Register by the Environmental Protection Agency. No public meetings are scheduled at this time. Public meetings will be scheduled during the 60 day review and announced in local media and online via the park’s Web site at http:// www.nps.gov/mana and via the NPS park planning Web site at http:// parkplanning.nps.gov. ADDRESSES: Paper and electronic copies on CD–ROM of the GMP/EIS are available by request. Interested persons and organizations can obtain a copy by writing to Manassas National Battlefield Park, c/o Dr. Robert K. Sutton, Superintendent, 12521 Lee Highway, Manassas, Virginia 20109–2005, by telephoning (703) 754–1861, or by emailing robert_sutton.nps.gov. The document is also available to be picked up in person at the headquarters of Manassas National Battlefield Park, 12521 Lee Highway, Manassas, Virginia 20109–2005. This document can also be found online at the NPS park planning Web site at http://parkplanning.nps.gov. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Robert K. Sutton, Superintendent, Manassas National Battlefield Park, 12521 Lee Highway, Manassas, Virginia 20109–2005, telephone (703) 754–1861, robert_sutton@nps.gov. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The purpose of the GMP/EIS is to set forth the basic management philosophy for the park and to provide strategies for addressing issues and achieving identified management objectives for the next 15 to 20 years. The GMP/EIS describes and analyzes the environmental impacts of two action alternatives that would guide the future management of the park. Alternative B, the preferred alternative, is titled ‘‘The Two Battles of Manassas—A Comprehensive Understanding of Each Battle.’’ Alternative C is titled ‘‘The VerDate Aug<31>2005 18:14 Jan 03, 2006 Jkt 205001 Defining Moments of the Battles of Manassas—An Understanding of the Principal Events.’’ Alternative A is also evaluated. It is the no-action alternative and would continue to guide the park as it is now under the current management practices. Persons wishing to comment may do so by one of several ways. Written comments can be mailed to Dr. Robert K. Sutton, Superintendent, Manassas National Battlefield Park, 12521 Lee Highway, Manassas, Virginia 20109– 2005. Comments may be submitted online at http://parkplanning.nps.gov. Written comments may also be handdelivered to the park headquarters of Manassas National Battlefield Park, 12521 Lee Highway, Manassas, Virginia 20109–2005. Regardless of how the comment is submitted, please include your name and return address with your comment. The NPS practice is to make comments available for public review during regular business hours, including the names and home addresses of respondents. Individual respondents may request that we withhold their home address from the record, which we will honor to the extent allowable by law. There also might be circumstances in which we would withhold from the record a respondent’s identity, as allowable by law. If you wish us to withhold your name and/or address, you must state this request prominently at the beginning of your comment. Please note that we will not consider anonymous comments. We will make all submissions from organizations or businesses, and from individuals identifying themselves as representatives or officials of organizations or businesses, available for public inspection in their entirety. The responsible official is Joseph M. Lawler, Regional Director, National Capital Region. Dated: November 15, 2005. Joseph M. Lawler, Regional Director, National Capital Region. [FR Doc. 06–34 Filed 1–3–06; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4312–JK–M INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION [Inv. No. 337–TA–558] In the Matter of Certain Personal Computer/Consumer Electronic Convergent Devices, Components Thereof, and Products Containing Same; Notice of Investigation U.S. International Trade Commission. AGENCY: PO 00000 Frm 00039 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 363 Institution of investigation pursuant to 19 U.S.C. 1337. ACTION: SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that a complaint was filed with the U.S. International Trade Commission on December 6, 2005, under section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, 19 U.S.C. 1337, on behalf of InterVideo Digital Technology Corporation of Taiwan. The complaint alleges violations of section 337 in the importation into the United States, the sale for importation, and the sale within the United States after importation of certain personal computer/consumer electronic convergent devices, components thereof, and products containing same by reason of infringement of claims 1–10 of U.S. Patent No. 6,765,788 (‘‘the ’788 patent’’). The complaint further alleges that an industry in the United States exists as required by subsection (a)(2) of section 337. The complainant requests that the Commission institute an investigation and, after the investigation, issue a permanent limited exclusion order and cease and desist orders. On November 15, 2004, a petition for ex parte reexamination of the ’788 patent was filed by Daniel R. McClure. Complaint, ¶ 58, p. 14, Exh. 19. On February 9, 2005, the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (‘‘PTO’’) granted the petition and on November 30, 2005, the PTO issued a First Office Action rejecting all ten claims of the ’788 patent. Complaint, ¶ 58, p. 14, Exh. 19. In view of the foregoing reexamination proceedings, which could result in disallowance or amendment of the asserted claims, the Commission is ordering the presiding Administrative Law Judge to issue an initial determination (‘‘ID’’) concerning whether the investigation should be stayed pending the completion of the reexamination of the ’788 patent. ADDRESSES: The complaint, except for any confidential information contained therein, is available for inspection during official business hours (8:45 a.m. to 5:15 p.m.) in the Office of the Secretary, U.S. International Trade Commission, 500 E Street, SW., Room 112, Washington, DC 20436, telephone (202) 205–2000. Hearing impaired individuals are advised that information on this matter can be obtained by contacting the Commission’s TDD terminal on (202) 205–1810. Persons with mobility impairments who will need special assistance in gaining access to the Commission should contact the Office of the Secretary at (202) 205– 2000. General information concerning the Commission may also be obtained E:\FR\FM\04JAN1.SGM 04JAN1 364 Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 2 / Wednesday, January 4, 2006 / Notices by accessing its Internet server at http://www.usitc.gov. The public record for this investigation may be viewed on the Commission’s electronic docket (EDIS) at http://edis.usitc.gov. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jay H. Reiziss, Esq., Office of Unfair Import Investigations, U.S. International Trade Commission, telephone 202–205–2579. wwhite on PROD1PC61 with NOTICES Authority: The authority for institution of this investigation is contained in section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, and in section 210.10 of the Commission’s Rules of Practice and Procedure, 19 CFR 210.10 (2005). Scope Of Investigation: Having considered the complaint, the U.S. International Trade Commission, on December 29, 2006, ordered that— (1) Pursuant to subsection (b) of section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, an investigation be instituted to determine whether there is a violation of subsection (a)(1)(B) of section 337 in the importation into the United States, the sale for importation, or the sale within the United States after importation of certain personal computer/consumer electronic convergent devices, components thereof, and products containing same by reason of infringement of one or more of claims 1–10 of U.S. Patent No. 6,765,788, and whether an industry in the United States exists as required by subsection (a)(2) of section 337. (2) The presiding Administrative Law Judge shall set the target date pursuant to Commission Rule 210.51, 19 CFR 210.51, and, as soon as is practicable, issue an ID concerning whether to stay the proceedings in light of the reexamination of the ‘788 patent. The Administrative Law Judge is authorized to receive briefing on the issue of whether to grant a stay of the proceedings as he deems necessary; (3) The ID issued pursuant to the preceding paragraph (whether issuing or denying a stay) shall be deemed an ID under Rule 210.42(c) of the Commission’s Rules of Practice and Procedure (19 CFR 210.42(c)) and the parties to the investigation may petition for review of the ID or the Commission may determine to review the ID on its own motion; (4) For the purpose of the investigation so instituted, the following are hereby named as parties upon which this notice of investigation shall be served: (a) The complainant is—InterVideo Digital Technology Corporation, 7F, No. 19–5, Sanchong Road, Nankang District, Taipei, Taiwan 115 R.O.C. (b) The respondents are the following entities alleged to be in violation of VerDate Aug<31>2005 17:18 Jan 03, 2006 Jkt 208001 section 337, and are the parties upon which the complaint is to be served: INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION Dell, Inc., One Dell Way, Round Rock, Texas 78682. [Inv. No. 337–TA–557] WinBook Computer Corporation, 1555 W. Lane Avenue, Columbus, OH 43221. Cyberlink Corp., 15F, 100, Ming-Chiuan Road, Hsin-Tien City, Taipei Hsien, Taiwan, R.O.C. Cyberlink.com Corporation, 46750 Fremont Boulevard, Suite, Fremont, California 94538. (c) Jay H. Reiziss, Esq., Office of Unfair Import Investigations, U.S. International Trade Commission, 500 E Street, SW., Suite 401, Washington, DC 20436, who shall be the Commission investigative attorney, party to this investigation; and (5) For the investigation so instituted, the Honorable Robert L. Barton, Jr. is designated as the presiding administrative law judge. Responses to the complaint and the notice of investigation must be submitted by the named respondents in accordance with section 210.13 of the Commission’s Rules of Practice and Procedure, 19 CFR 210.13. Pursuant to 19 CFR 201.16(d) and 210.13(a), such responses will be considered by the Commission if received not later than 20 days after the date of service by the Commission of the complaint and the notice of investigation. Extensions of time for submitting responses to the complaint and the notice of investigation will not be granted unless good cause therefor is shown. Failure of a respondent to file a timely response to each allegation in the complaint and in this notice may be deemed to constitute a waiver of the right to appear and contest the allegations of the complaint and this notice, and to authorize the administrative law judge and the Commission, without further notice to the respondents, to find the facts to be as alleged in the complaint and this notice and to enter a final determination containing such findings, and may result in the issuance of a limited exclusion order or cease and desist order or both directed against the respondent. By order of the Commission. Issued: December 29, 2005. Marilyn R. Abbott, Secretary to the Commission. [FR Doc. E5–8258 Filed 1–3–06; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 7020–02–P PO 00000 Frm 00040 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 In the Matter of Certain Automotive Parts; Notice of Investigation U.S. International Trade Commission. ACTION: Institution of investigation pursuant to 19 U.S.C. 1337. AGENCY: SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that a complaint was filed with the U.S. International Trade Commission on December 6, 2005, under section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, 19 U.S.C. 1337, on behalf of Ford Global Technologies, LLC of Dearborn, Michigan. An amended complaint was filed on December 12, 2005, and a supplemental letter was filed on December 22, 2005. The amended complaint, as supplemented, alleges violations of section 337 in the importation into the United States, the sale for importation, and the sale within the United States after importation of certain automotive parts by reason of infringement of U.S. Design Patent Nos. D495,979, D496,890, D492,801, D501,685, D493,552, D497,579, D503,135, D491,119, D489,299, D489,658, D496,615, D503,912, D502,561, and D492,044. The complaint further alleges that an industry in the United States exists as required by subsection (a)(2) of section 337. The complainant requests that the Commission institute an investigation and, after the investigation, issue a permanent general exclusion order and cease and desist orders. ADDRESSES: The complaint, except for any confidential information contained therein, is available for inspection during official business hours (8:45 a.m. to 5:15 p.m.) in the Office of the Secretary, U.S. International Trade Commission, 500 E Street, SW., Room 112, Washington, DC 20436, telephone 202–205–2000. Hearing impaired individuals are advised that information on this matter can be obtained by contacting the Commission’s TDD terminal on (202) 205–1810. Persons with mobility impairments who will need special assistance in gaining access to the Commission should contact the Office of the Secretary at (202) 205– 2000. General information concerning the Commission may also be obtained by accessing its Internet server at http://www.usitc.gov. The public record for this investigation may be viewed on the Commission’s electronic docket (EDIS) at http://edis.usitc.gov. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Juan Cockburn, Esq., Office of Unfair Import E:\FR\FM\04JAN1.SGM 04JAN1

Agencies

[Federal Register Volume 71, Number 2 (Wednesday, January 4, 2006)]
[Notices]
[Pages 363-364]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E5-8258]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION

[Inv. No. 337-TA-558]


In the Matter of Certain Personal Computer/Consumer Electronic 
Convergent Devices, Components Thereof, and Products Containing Same; 
Notice of Investigation

AGENCY: U.S. International Trade Commission.

ACTION: Institution of investigation pursuant to 19 U.S.C. 1337.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that a complaint was filed with the 
U.S. International Trade Commission on December 6, 2005, under section 
337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, 19 U.S.C. 1337, on behalf of 
InterVideo Digital Technology Corporation of Taiwan. The complaint 
alleges violations of section 337 in the importation into the United 
States, the sale for importation, and the sale within the United States 
after importation of certain personal computer/consumer electronic 
convergent devices, components thereof, and products containing same by 
reason of infringement of claims 1-10 of U.S. Patent No. 6,765,788 
(``the '788 patent''). The complaint further alleges that an industry 
in the United States exists as required by subsection (a)(2) of section 
337.
    The complainant requests that the Commission institute an 
investigation and, after the investigation, issue a permanent limited 
exclusion order and cease and desist orders.
    On November 15, 2004, a petition for ex parte reexamination of the 
'788 patent was filed by Daniel R. McClure. Complaint, ] 58, p. 14, 
Exh. 19. On February 9, 2005, the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office 
(``PTO'') granted the petition and on November 30, 2005, the PTO issued 
a First Office Action rejecting all ten claims of the '788 patent. 
Complaint, ] 58, p. 14, Exh. 19. In view of the foregoing reexamination 
proceedings, which could result in disallowance or amendment of the 
asserted claims, the Commission is ordering the presiding 
Administrative Law Judge to issue an initial determination (``ID'') 
concerning whether the investigation should be stayed pending the 
completion of the reexamination of the '788 patent.

ADDRESSES: The complaint, except for any confidential information 
contained therein, is available for inspection during official business 
hours (8:45 a.m. to 5:15 p.m.) in the Office of the Secretary, U.S. 
International Trade Commission, 500 E Street, SW., Room 112, 
Washington, DC 20436, telephone (202) 205-2000. Hearing impaired 
individuals are advised that information on this matter can be obtained 
by contacting the Commission's TDD terminal on (202) 205-1810. Persons 
with mobility impairments who will need special assistance in gaining 
access to the Commission should contact the Office of the Secretary at 
(202) 205-2000. General information concerning the Commission may also 
be obtained

[[Page 364]]

by accessing its Internet server at http://www.usitc.gov. The public 
record for this investigation may be viewed on the Commission's 
electronic docket (EDIS) at http://edis.usitc.gov.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jay H. Reiziss, Esq., Office of Unfair 
Import Investigations, U.S. International Trade Commission, telephone 
202-205-2579.

    Authority: The authority for institution of this investigation 
is contained in section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, 
and in section 210.10 of the Commission's Rules of Practice and 
Procedure, 19 CFR 210.10 (2005).
    Scope Of Investigation: Having considered the complaint, the U.S. 
International Trade Commission, on December 29, 2006, ordered that--
    (1) Pursuant to subsection (b) of section 337 of the Tariff Act of 
1930, as amended, an investigation be instituted to determine whether 
there is a violation of subsection (a)(1)(B) of section 337 in the 
importation into the United States, the sale for importation, or the 
sale within the United States after importation of certain personal 
computer/consumer electronic convergent devices, components thereof, 
and products containing same by reason of infringement of one or more 
of claims 1-10 of U.S. Patent No. 6,765,788, and whether an industry in 
the United States exists as required by subsection (a)(2) of section 
337.
    (2) The presiding Administrative Law Judge shall set the target 
date pursuant to Commission Rule 210.51, 19 CFR 210.51, and, as soon as 
is practicable, issue an ID concerning whether to stay the proceedings 
in light of the reexamination of the `788 patent. The Administrative 
Law Judge is authorized to receive briefing on the issue of whether to 
grant a stay of the proceedings as he deems necessary;
    (3) The ID issued pursuant to the preceding paragraph (whether 
issuing or denying a stay) shall be deemed an ID under Rule 210.42(c) 
of the Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure (19 CFR 210.42(c)) 
and the parties to the investigation may petition for review of the ID 
or the Commission may determine to review the ID on its own motion;
    (4) For the purpose of the investigation so instituted, the 
following are hereby named as parties upon which this notice of 
investigation shall be served:
    (a) The complainant is--InterVideo Digital Technology Corporation, 
7F, No. 19-5, Sanchong Road, Nankang District, Taipei, Taiwan 115 
R.O.C.
    (b) The respondents are the following entities alleged to be in 
violation of section 337, and are the parties upon which the complaint 
is to be served:

Dell, Inc., One Dell Way, Round Rock, Texas 78682.

WinBook Computer Corporation, 1555 W. Lane Avenue, Columbus, OH 43221.
Cyberlink Corp., 15F, 100, Ming-Chiuan Road, Hsin-Tien City, Taipei 
Hsien, Taiwan, R.O.C.
Cyberlink.com Corporation, 46750 Fremont Boulevard, Suite, Fremont, 
California 94538.

    (c) Jay H. Reiziss, Esq., Office of Unfair Import Investigations, 
U.S. International Trade Commission, 500 E Street, SW., Suite 401, 
Washington, DC 20436, who shall be the Commission investigative 
attorney, party to this investigation; and
    (5) For the investigation so instituted, the Honorable Robert L. 
Barton, Jr. is designated as the presiding administrative law judge.
    Responses to the complaint and the notice of investigation must be 
submitted by the named respondents in accordance with section 210.13 of 
the Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure, 19 CFR 210.13. 
Pursuant to 19 CFR 201.16(d) and 210.13(a), such responses will be 
considered by the Commission if received not later than 20 days after 
the date of service by the Commission of the complaint and the notice 
of investigation. Extensions of time for submitting responses to the 
complaint and the notice of investigation will not be granted unless 
good cause therefor is shown.
    Failure of a respondent to file a timely response to each 
allegation in the complaint and in this notice may be deemed to 
constitute a waiver of the right to appear and contest the allegations 
of the complaint and this notice, and to authorize the administrative 
law judge and the Commission, without further notice to the 
respondents, to find the facts to be as alleged in the complaint and 
this notice and to enter a final determination containing such 
findings, and may result in the issuance of a limited exclusion order 
or cease and desist order or both directed against the respondent.

    By order of the Commission.

    Issued: December 29, 2005.
Marilyn R. Abbott,
Secretary to the Commission.
[FR Doc. E5-8258 Filed 1-3-06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7020-02-P