Notice of Preliminary Results of Antidumping Duty Changed Circumstances Review and Intent to Revoke Order in Part: Certain Cased Pencils from the People's Republic of China, 92-94 [E5-8213]
Download as PDF
92
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 1 / Tuesday, January 3, 2006 / Notices
consult the Department’s regulations at
19 CFR Part 351 for definitions of terms
and for other general information
concerning antidumping and
countervailing duty proceedings at the
Department.
This notice of initiation is being
published in accordance with section
751(c) of the Act and 19 CFR 351.218(c).
Dated: December 14, 2005.
Thomas F. Futtner,
Acting Office Director, AD/CVD Operations,
Office 4 for Import Administration.
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
Antidumping or Countervailing Duty
Order, Finding, or Suspended
Investigation; Advance Notification of
Sunset Reviews
AGENCY: Import Administration,
International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
ACTION: Notice of Upcoming Sunset
Reviews.
[FR Doc. E5–8210 Filed 12–30–05; 8:45 am]
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
BILLING CODE 3510–DS–S
Background
Every five years, pursuant to section
751(c) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as
amended, the Department of Commerce
(‘‘the Department’’) and the International
Trade Commission automatically
initiate and conduct a review to
determine whether revocation of a
countervailing or antidumping duty
order or termination of an investigation
suspended under section 704 or 734
would be likely to lead to continuation
or recurrence of dumping or a
countervailable subsidy (as the case may
be) and of material injury.
Upcoming Sunset Reviews for February
2006
The following Sunset Reviews are
scheduled for initiation in February
2006 and will appear in that month’s
Notice of Initiation of Five–Year Sunset
Reviews.
Antidumping Duty Orders
Department Contact
Fresh Garlic from the People’s Republic of China (A–570–831) - (2nd Review) .......................
Grain–Oriented Electrical Steel from Italy (A–475–811) - (2nd Review) ....................................
Grain–Oriented Electrical Steel from Japan (A–588–831) - (2nd Review) .................................
Maureen Flannery (202) 482–3020
Dana Mermelstein (202) 482–1391
Dana Mermelstein (202) 482–1391
Countervailing Duty Orders
Grain–Oriented Electrical Steel from Italy (C–475–812) - (2nd Review) ....................................
David Goldberger (202) 482–4136
rmajette on DSK29S0YB1PROD with NOTICES6
Suspended Investigations
No suspended investigations are scheduled for initiation in February 2006.
The Department’s procedures for the
conduct of Sunset Reviews are set forth
in 19 CFR 351.218. Guidance on
methodological or analytical issues
relevant to the Department’s conduct of
Sunset Reviews is set forth in the
Department’s Policy Bulletin 98.3-Policies Regarding the Conduct of Five–
Year (‘‘Sunset’’) Reviews of
Antidumping and Countervailing Duty
Orders; Policy Bulletin, 63 FR 18871
(April 16, 1998) (‘‘Sunset Policy
Bulletin’’). The Notice of Initiation of
Five–Year (‘‘Sunset’’) Reviews provides
further information regarding what is
required of all parties to participate in
Sunset Reviews.
Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.103(c), the
Department will maintain and make
available a service list for these
proceedings. To facilitate the timely
preparation of the service list(s), it is
requested that those seeking recognition
as interested parties to a proceeding
contact the Department in writing
within 10 days of the publication of the
Notice of Initiation.
Please note that if the Department
receives a Notice of Intent to Participate
from a member of the domestic industry
within 15 days of the date of initiation,
final sunset regulations at 19 CFR 351.218(d)(4). As
provided in 19 CFR 351.302(b), however, the
Department will consider individual requests for
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:46 Nov 10, 2010
Jkt 223001
the review will continue. Thereafter,
any interested party wishing to
participate in the Sunset Review must
provide substantive comments in
response to the notice of initiation no
later than 30 days after the date of
initiation.
This notice is not required by statute
but is published as a service to the
international trading community.
Dated: December 14, 2005.
Thomas F. Futtner,
Acting Office Director, AD/CVD Operations,
Office 4 for Import Administration.
[FR Doc. E5–8212 Filed 12–30–05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–DS–S
extension of that five-day deadline based upon a
showing of good cause.
1 These domestic interested parties are Sanford
Corporation, Musgrave Pencil Company, Rose
PO 00000
Frm 00007
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
(A–570–827)
Notice of Preliminary Results of
Antidumping Duty Changed
Circumstances Review and Intent to
Revoke Order in Part: Certain Cased
Pencils from the People’s Republic of
China
AGENCY: Import Administration,
International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
SUMMARY: M.A. Notch Corporation
(Notch) filed a request for a changed
circumstances review of the
antidumping duty (AD) order on certain
cased pencils from the People’s
Republic of China (PRC). Specifically,
Notch requests that the Department
revoke the AD order with respect to a
large novelty pencil, which is described
below. Certain domestic interested
parties have affirmatively expressed a
lack of interest in the continuation of
the order with respect to this product.1
In response to the request, the
Department initiated a changed
circumstances review of the AD order
on certain cased pencils from the PRC.
Moon, Inc., and General Pencil Company, domestic
manufacturers of cased pencils, (collectively, the
domestic interested parties).
E:\FR\FM\03JAN1.SGM
03JAN1
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 1 / Tuesday, January 3, 2006 / Notices
Interested parties are invited to
comment on these preliminary results.
EFFECTIVE DATE: January 3, 2006.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Paul
Stolz or Charles Riggle, AD/CVD
Operations, Office 8, Import
Administration, International Trade
Administration, U.S. Department of
Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution
Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20230;
telephone (202) 482–4474 and (202)
482–0650, respectively.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
rmajette on DSK29S0YB1PROD with NOTICES6
On April 14, 2005, Notch, a U.S.
importer, filed a request asking the
Department to revoke the AD order on
certain cased pencils from the PRC with
respect to a large novelty pencil. See
Notch letter to the Secretary, dated
April 5, 2005 (Notch Request Letter).
Specifically, Notch requests that the
Department revoke the AD order with
respect to imports of certain cased
pencils meeting the following
description: novelty jumbo pencil that is
octagonal in shape, approximately ten
inches long, one inch in diameter, and
three–and-one eighth inches in
circumference, composed of turned
wood encasing one–and-one half inches
of sharpened lead on one end and a
rubber eraser on the other end. See
Notch Request Letter at 1. On May 6,
2005, the domestic interested parties
submitted a letter to the Department
stating that they ‘‘ * * * do not object
to exclusion of items meeting the
description set forth in the quoted
description’’ (as stated above). On
August 22, 2005,2 the Department
initiated a changed circumstances
review. See Notice of Initiation of
Antidumping Duty Changed
Circumstances Review: Certain Cased
Pencils from the People’s Republic of
China, 70 FR 51336 (August 30, 2005).
On August 25, 2005, we informed all
interested parties that comments on the
initiation of the changed circumstances
review and/or comments with respect to
whether the domestic interested parties
account for substantially all of the
production of the domestic like product,
were due 21 days subsequent to
publication of the initiation notice in
the Federal Register. No interested
party submitted comments.
Scope of the Order
Imports covered by this order are
shipments of certain cased pencils of
any shape or dimension (except as
described below) which are writing and/
or drawing instruments that feature
2 This
is the signature date.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:46 Nov 10, 2010
Jkt 223001
cores of graphite or other materials,
encased in wood and/or man–made
materials, whether or not decorated and
whether or not tipped (e.g., with erasers,
etc.) in any fashion, and either
sharpened or unsharpened. The pencils
subject to the order are currently
classifiable under subheading
9609.10.00 of the Harmonized Tariff
Schedule of the United States (HTSUS).
Specifically excluded from the scope of
the order are mechanical pencils,
cosmetic pencils, pens, non–cased
crayons (wax), pastels, charcoals,
chalks, and pencils produced under
U.S. patent number 6,217,242, from
paper infused with scents by the means
covered in the above–referenced patent,
thereby having odors distinct from those
that may emanate from pencils lacking
the scent infusion. Also excluded from
the scope of the order are pencils with
all of the following physical
characteristics: 1) length: 13.5 or more
inches; 2) sheath diameter: not less than
one–and-one quarter inches at any point
(before sharpening); and 3) core length:
not more than 15 percent of the length
of the pencil.
Although the HTSUS subheading is
provided for convenience and customs
purposes, the written description of the
scope of the order is dispositive.
Prior Changed Circumstance Rulings
The Department has published the
final results of the following changed
circumstances reviews to date:
(1) On November 4, 2003 the
Department published the final results
of a changed circumstances review that
excluded from the scope of the order
pencils with all of the following
physical characteristics: 1) length: 13.5
or more inches; 2) sheath diameter: not
less than one–and-one quarter inches at
any point (before sharpening); and 3)
core length: not more than 15 percent of
the length of the pencil. See Notice of
Final Results of Antidumping Duty
Changed Circumstances Review, and
Determination to Revoke Order in Part:
Certain Cased Pencils from the People’s
Republic of China, 68 FR 62428
(November 4, 2003).
(2) On March 27, 2003 the Department
published the final results of a changed
circumstances review that excluded
from the scope of the order pencils
produced under U.S. patent number
6,217,242, from paper infused with
scents by the means covered in the
above–referenced patent, thereby having
odors distinct from those that may
emanate from pencils lacking the scent
infusion. See Notice of Final Results of
Antidumping Duty Changed
Circumstances Review, and
Determination to Revoke Order in Part:
PO 00000
Frm 00008
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
93
Certain Cased Pencils from the People’s
Republic of China, 68 FR 14942 (March
27, 2003).
Preliminary Results of AD Changed
Circumstances Review and Intent to
Revoke in Part
Section 751(d)(1) of the Act and
section 351.222(g) of the Department’s
regulations provide that the Department
may revoke an AD or countervailing
duty order, in whole or in part, after
conducting a changed circumstances
review and concluding from the
available information that changed
circumstances sufficient to warrant
revocation or termination exist. The
Department may conclude that changed
circumstances sufficient to warrant
revocation (in whole or in part) exist
when producers accounting for
substantially all of the production of the
domestic like product to which the
order pertains have expressed a lack of
interest in the order, in whole or in part.
See section 782(h)(2) of the Act and
section 351.222 (g)(1)(I) of the
Department’s regulations. Based on an
affirmative statement by the domestic
interested parties, producers of the like
product, and the fact that no party has
commented otherwise, we find that no
interest exists in continuing the AD
order with respect to large novelty
pencils described in the proposed scope
language below. Therefore, we are
hereby notifying the public of our
preliminary intent to revoke, in part, the
AD order on certain cased pencils from
the PRC with respect to imports of
novelty pencils that meet the
description below.
New Scope of the Order
Upon publication of the final results
of this changed circumstances review, if
there are no changes from the
preliminary results, we intend to modify
the scope of the AD order to read as
follows:
Imports covered by this order are
shipments of certain cased pencils
of any shape or dimension (except
as noted below) which are writing
and/or drawing instruments that
feature cores of graphite or other
materials, encased in wood and/or
man–made materials, whether or
not decorated and whether or not
tipped (e.g., with erasers, etc.) in
any fashion, and either sharpened
or unsharpened. The pencils subject
to the order are currently
classifiable under subheading
9609.10.00 of the Harmonized Tariff
Schedule of the United States
(HTSUS). Specifically excluded
from the scope of the order are
mechanical pencils, cosmetic
E:\FR\FM\03JAN1.SGM
03JAN1
rmajette on DSK29S0YB1PROD with NOTICES6
94
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 1 / Tuesday, January 3, 2006 / Notices
pencils, pens, non–cased crayons
(wax), pastels, charcoals, chalks,
and pencils produced under U.S.
patent number 6,217,242, from
paper infused with scents by the
means covered in the above–
referenced patent, thereby having
odors distinct from those that may
emanate from pencils lacking the
scent infusion. Also excluded from
the scope of the order are pencils
with all of the following physical
characteristics: 1) length: 13.5 or
more inches; 2) sheath diameter:
not less than one–and-one quarter
inches at any point (before
sharpening); and 3) core length: not
more than 15 percent of the length
of the pencil.
In addition, pencils with all of the
following physical characteristics
are excluded from the scope of the
order: novelty jumbo pencils that
are octagonal in shape,
approximately ten inches long, one
inch in diameter before sharpening,
and three–and-one eighth inches in
circumference, composed of turned
wood encasing one–and-one half
inches of sharpened lead on one
end and a rubber eraser on the other
end. Although the HTSUS
subheading is provided for
convenience and customs purposes
our written description of the scope
of the order is dispositive.
If the final partial revocation occurs,
we intend to instruct U.S. Customs and
Border Protection (CBP) to liquidate,
without regard to applicable
antidumping duties, all unliquidated
entries of pencils that meet the above–
noted exclusion, and to refund any
estimated antidumping duties collected
on such merchandise entered, or
withdrawn from warehouse, for
consumption on or after December 1,
2001, the day after the most recent
period for which the Department issued
assessment instructions to CBP (12/1/
2000–11/30/2001), in accordance with
section 351.222 of the Department’s
regulations. We will also instruct CBP to
pay interest on such refunds with
respect to the subject merchandise
entered, or withdrawn from warehouse,
for consumption on or after December 1,
2001, in accordance with section 778 of
the Act. See Notice of Initiation and
Preliminary Results of Changed
Circumstances Antidumping Duty
Administrative Review, and Intent to
Revoke Order in Part: Certain Cut–ToLength Carbon–Quality Steel Plate
Products from Japan, 68 FR 1436
(January 10, 2003).
The current cash deposit rate will
remain in effect for all entries of subject
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:46 Nov 10, 2010
Jkt 223001
merchandise until completion of an
administrative review.
Public Comment
Interested parties are invited to
comment on these preliminary results.
Written comments may be submitted by
interested parties not later than 14 days
after the date of publication of this
notice. Parties who submit argument in
this proceeding are requested to submit
with the argument: (1) a statement of the
issue, and (2) a brief summary of the
argument. Pursuant to section
351.309(d) of the Department’s
regulations, rebuttals to written
comments, limited to the issues raised
in the case briefs, may be filed not later
than five days after the deadline for
submission of case briefs. Also,
interested parties may request a hearing
within 30 days of publication of this
notice. Any hearing, if requested, may
be held no later than two days after the
deadline for the submission of rebuttal
briefs, or the first workday thereafter.
All written comments shall be
submitted in accordance with section
351.303 of the Department’s regulations
and shall be served on all interested
parties on the Department’s service list.
The Department will issue the final
results of this review within the time
limits established in section 351.216(e)
of its regulations.
This notice is published in
accordance with section 751(b)(1) of the
Act and sections 351.216 and 351.222 of
the Department’s regulations.
Dated: December 7, 2005.
Stephen J. Claeys,
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Import
Administration.
[FR Doc. E5–8213 Filed 12–30–05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–DS–S
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
(A–507–502)
Continuation of Antidumping Duty
Order on Certain In–Shell Pistachios
from Iran
Import Administration,
International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
SUMMARY: As a result of the
determinations by the Department of
Commerce (‘‘the Department’’) and the
International Trade Commission (‘‘ITC’’)
that revocation of the antidumping duty
order on certain in–shell pistachios
(‘‘in–shell pistachios’’) from Iran would
likely lead to continuation or recurrence
of dumping and material injury to an
industry in the United States, the
AGENCY:
PO 00000
Frm 00009
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Department is publishing notice of
continuation of this antidumping duty
order.
EFFECTIVE DATE: January 3, 2006.
CONTACT INFORMATION: Dana
Mermelstein, AD/CVD Operations,
Office 6, or John Drury, AD/CVD
Operations, Office 7, Import
Administration, International Trade
Administration, U.S. Department of
Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution
Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20230,
telephone: (202) 482–1391 or (202) 482–
0195, respectively.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
On March 1, 2005, the Department
initiated and the ITC instituted a sunset
review of the antidumping duty order
on in–shell pistachios from Iran,
pursuant to section 751(c) of the Tariff
Act of 1930, as amended (‘‘the Act’’).1
As a result of its review, the
Department found that revocation of the
antidumping duty order would likely
lead to continuation or recurrence of
dumping, and notified the ITC of the
magnitude of the margins likely to
prevail were the order to be revoked.2
On December 22, 2005, the ITC
determined, pursuant to section 751(c)
of the Act, that revocation of the
antidumping duty order on in–shell
pistachios from Iran would likely lead
to continuation or recurrence of material
injury to an industry in the United
States within a reasonably foreseeable
time.3
Scope of the Order
The product covered by the
antidumping duty order is raw, in–shell
pistachio nuts from which the hulls
have been removed, leaving the inner
hard shells, and edible meats from Iran.
This merchandise is currently provided
for in subheading 0802.50.20.00 of the
Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the
United States (HTSUS). Although the
HTSUS subheading is provided for
convenience and customs purposes, the
Department’s written description of the
merchandise under order is dispositive.
Determination
As a result of the determinations by
the Department and the ITC that
1 See Initiation of Five-Year (‘‘Sunset’’) Reviews,
70 FR 9919 (March 1, 2005) and Raw In-Shell
Pistachios from Iran, 70 FR 9976 (March 1, 2005).
2 See Certain In-Shell Pistachios from Iran; Final
Results of the Expedited Sunset Review of the
Antidumping Duty Order, 70 FR 57855 (October 4,
2005).
3 See Raw In-Shell Pistachios from Iran, 70 FR
76076 (December 22, 2005) and USITC Publication
3824, Investigation No. 731-TA-287 (Review)
(December 2005).
E:\FR\FM\03JAN1.SGM
03JAN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 71, Number 1 (Tuesday, January 3, 2006)]
[Notices]
[Pages 92-94]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E5-8213]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
(A-570-827)
Notice of Preliminary Results of Antidumping Duty Changed
Circumstances Review and Intent to Revoke Order in Part: Certain Cased
Pencils from the People's Republic of China
AGENCY: Import Administration, International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
SUMMARY: M.A. Notch Corporation (Notch) filed a request for a changed
circumstances review of the antidumping duty (AD) order on certain
cased pencils from the People's Republic of China (PRC). Specifically,
Notch requests that the Department revoke the AD order with respect to
a large novelty pencil, which is described below. Certain domestic
interested parties have affirmatively expressed a lack of interest in
the continuation of the order with respect to this product.\1\ In
response to the request, the Department initiated a changed
circumstances review of the AD order on certain cased pencils from the
PRC.
[[Page 93]]
Interested parties are invited to comment on these preliminary results.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ These domestic interested parties are Sanford Corporation,
Musgrave Pencil Company, Rose Moon, Inc., and General Pencil
Company, domestic manufacturers of cased pencils, (collectively, the
domestic interested parties).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
EFFECTIVE DATE: January 3, 2006.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Paul Stolz or Charles Riggle, AD/CVD
Operations, Office 8, Import Administration, International Trade
Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 14\th\ Street and
Constitution Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20230; telephone (202) 482-
4474 and (202) 482-0650, respectively.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
On April 14, 2005, Notch, a U.S. importer, filed a request asking
the Department to revoke the AD order on certain cased pencils from the
PRC with respect to a large novelty pencil. See Notch letter to the
Secretary, dated April 5, 2005 (Notch Request Letter). Specifically,
Notch requests that the Department revoke the AD order with respect to
imports of certain cased pencils meeting the following description:
novelty jumbo pencil that is octagonal in shape, approximately ten
inches long, one inch in diameter, and three-and-one eighth inches in
circumference, composed of turned wood encasing one-and-one half inches
of sharpened lead on one end and a rubber eraser on the other end. See
Notch Request Letter at 1. On May 6, 2005, the domestic interested
parties submitted a letter to the Department stating that they `` * * *
do not object to exclusion of items meeting the description set forth
in the quoted description'' (as stated above). On August 22, 2005,\2\
the Department initiated a changed circumstances review. See Notice of
Initiation of Antidumping Duty Changed Circumstances Review: Certain
Cased Pencils from the People's Republic of China, 70 FR 51336 (August
30, 2005).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\2\ This is the signature date.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
On August 25, 2005, we informed all interested parties that
comments on the initiation of the changed circumstances review and/or
comments with respect to whether the domestic interested parties
account for substantially all of the production of the domestic like
product, were due 21 days subsequent to publication of the initiation
notice in the Federal Register. No interested party submitted comments.
Scope of the Order
Imports covered by this order are shipments of certain cased
pencils of any shape or dimension (except as described below) which are
writing and/or drawing instruments that feature cores of graphite or
other materials, encased in wood and/or man-made materials, whether or
not decorated and whether or not tipped (e.g., with erasers, etc.) in
any fashion, and either sharpened or unsharpened. The pencils subject
to the order are currently classifiable under subheading 9609.10.00 of
the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States (HTSUS).
Specifically excluded from the scope of the order are mechanical
pencils, cosmetic pencils, pens, non-cased crayons (wax), pastels,
charcoals, chalks, and pencils produced under U.S. patent number
6,217,242, from paper infused with scents by the means covered in the
above-referenced patent, thereby having odors distinct from those that
may emanate from pencils lacking the scent infusion. Also excluded from
the scope of the order are pencils with all of the following physical
characteristics: 1) length: 13.5 or more inches; 2) sheath diameter:
not less than one-and-one quarter inches at any point (before
sharpening); and 3) core length: not more than 15 percent of the length
of the pencil.
Although the HTSUS subheading is provided for convenience and
customs purposes, the written description of the scope of the order is
dispositive.
Prior Changed Circumstance Rulings
The Department has published the final results of the following
changed circumstances reviews to date:
(1) On November 4, 2003 the Department published the final results
of a changed circumstances review that excluded from the scope of the
order pencils with all of the following physical characteristics: 1)
length: 13.5 or more inches; 2) sheath diameter: not less than one-and-
one quarter inches at any point (before sharpening); and 3) core
length: not more than 15 percent of the length of the pencil. See
Notice of Final Results of Antidumping Duty Changed Circumstances
Review, and Determination to Revoke Order in Part: Certain Cased
Pencils from the People's Republic of China, 68 FR 62428 (November 4,
2003).
(2) On March 27, 2003 the Department published the final results of
a changed circumstances review that excluded from the scope of the
order pencils produced under U.S. patent number 6,217,242, from paper
infused with scents by the means covered in the above-referenced
patent, thereby having odors distinct from those that may emanate from
pencils lacking the scent infusion. See Notice of Final Results of
Antidumping Duty Changed Circumstances Review, and Determination to
Revoke Order in Part: Certain Cased Pencils from the People's Republic
of China, 68 FR 14942 (March 27, 2003).
Preliminary Results of AD Changed Circumstances Review and Intent to
Revoke in Part
Section 751(d)(1) of the Act and section 351.222(g) of the
Department's regulations provide that the Department may revoke an AD
or countervailing duty order, in whole or in part, after conducting a
changed circumstances review and concluding from the available
information that changed circumstances sufficient to warrant revocation
or termination exist. The Department may conclude that changed
circumstances sufficient to warrant revocation (in whole or in part)
exist when producers accounting for substantially all of the production
of the domestic like product to which the order pertains have expressed
a lack of interest in the order, in whole or in part. See section
782(h)(2) of the Act and section 351.222 (g)(1)(I) of the Department's
regulations. Based on an affirmative statement by the domestic
interested parties, producers of the like product, and the fact that no
party has commented otherwise, we find that no interest exists in
continuing the AD order with respect to large novelty pencils described
in the proposed scope language below. Therefore, we are hereby
notifying the public of our preliminary intent to revoke, in part, the
AD order on certain cased pencils from the PRC with respect to imports
of novelty pencils that meet the description below.
New Scope of the Order
Upon publication of the final results of this changed circumstances
review, if there are no changes from the preliminary results, we intend
to modify the scope of the AD order to read as follows:
Imports covered by this order are shipments of certain cased
pencils of any shape or dimension (except as noted below) which are
writing and/or drawing instruments that feature cores of graphite or
other materials, encased in wood and/or man-made materials, whether or
not decorated and whether or not tipped (e.g., with erasers, etc.) in
any fashion, and either sharpened or unsharpened. The pencils subject
to the order are currently classifiable under subheading 9609.10.00 of
the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States (HTSUS).
Specifically excluded from the scope of the order are mechanical
pencils, cosmetic
[[Page 94]]
pencils, pens, non-cased crayons (wax), pastels, charcoals, chalks, and
pencils produced under U.S. patent number 6,217,242, from paper infused
with scents by the means covered in the above-referenced patent,
thereby having odors distinct from those that may emanate from pencils
lacking the scent infusion. Also excluded from the scope of the order
are pencils with all of the following physical characteristics: 1)
length: 13.5 or more inches; 2) sheath diameter: not less than one-and-
one quarter inches at any point (before sharpening); and 3) core
length: not more than 15 percent of the length of the pencil.
In addition, pencils with all of the following physical
characteristics are excluded from the scope of the order: novelty jumbo
pencils that are octagonal in shape, approximately ten inches long, one
inch in diameter before sharpening, and three-and-one eighth inches in
circumference, composed of turned wood encasing one-and-one half inches
of sharpened lead on one end and a rubber eraser on the other end.
Although the HTSUS subheading is provided for convenience and customs
purposes our written description of the scope of the order is
dispositive.
If the final partial revocation occurs, we intend to instruct U.S.
Customs and Border Protection (CBP) to liquidate, without regard to
applicable antidumping duties, all unliquidated entries of pencils that
meet the above-noted exclusion, and to refund any estimated antidumping
duties collected on such merchandise entered, or withdrawn from
warehouse, for consumption on or after December 1, 2001, the day after
the most recent period for which the Department issued assessment
instructions to CBP (12/1/2000-11/30/2001), in accordance with section
351.222 of the Department's regulations. We will also instruct CBP to
pay interest on such refunds with respect to the subject merchandise
entered, or withdrawn from warehouse, for consumption on or after
December 1, 2001, in accordance with section 778 of the Act. See Notice
of Initiation and Preliminary Results of Changed Circumstances
Antidumping Duty Administrative Review, and Intent to Revoke Order in
Part: Certain Cut-To-Length Carbon-Quality Steel Plate Products from
Japan, 68 FR 1436 (January 10, 2003).
The current cash deposit rate will remain in effect for all entries
of subject merchandise until completion of an administrative review.
Public Comment
Interested parties are invited to comment on these preliminary
results. Written comments may be submitted by interested parties not
later than 14 days after the date of publication of this notice.
Parties who submit argument in this proceeding are requested to submit
with the argument: (1) a statement of the issue, and (2) a brief
summary of the argument. Pursuant to section 351.309(d) of the
Department's regulations, rebuttals to written comments, limited to the
issues raised in the case briefs, may be filed not later than five days
after the deadline for submission of case briefs. Also, interested
parties may request a hearing within 30 days of publication of this
notice. Any hearing, if requested, may be held no later than two days
after the deadline for the submission of rebuttal briefs, or the first
workday thereafter. All written comments shall be submitted in
accordance with section 351.303 of the Department's regulations and
shall be served on all interested parties on the Department's service
list. The Department will issue the final results of this review within
the time limits established in section 351.216(e) of its regulations.
This notice is published in accordance with section 751(b)(1) of
the Act and sections 351.216 and 351.222 of the Department's
regulations.
Dated: December 7, 2005.
Stephen J. Claeys,
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Import Administration.
[FR Doc. E5-8213 Filed 12-30-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-S