Welded ASTM A-312 Stainless Steel Pipe from South Korea and Taiwan: Notice of Final Results of Expedited (“Sunset”) Reviews of Antidumping Duty Orders, 96-97 [E5-8209]
Download as PDF
<![CDATA[
96
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 1 / Tuesday, January 3, 2006 / Notices
manufactured by either NKK or SMI that
was entered or withdrawn from
warehouse for consumption during the
POR, we will direct CBP to liquidate at
the ‘‘all others’’ rate, 44.20 percent, as all
such sales were made by intermediary
companies (e.g., resellers) not covered
in this review, a prior review, or the less
than fair value (LTFV) investigation. See
Antidumping and Countervailing Duty
Proceedings: Assessment of
Antidumping Duties, 68 FR 23954 (May
6, 2003). The Department will issue
appropriate assessment instructions
directly to CBP within 15 days of
publication of these final results of
review.
CASH DEPOSIT REQUIREMENTS
The following cash deposit rates will
be effective with respect to all
shipments of OCTG from Japan entered,
or withdrawn from warehouse, for
consumption on or after the publication
date of these final results, as provided
for by section 751(a)(1) of the Act: (1) for
JFE and Nippon, the cash deposit rate
shall be 44.20 percent (the AFA rate
from the investigation); (2) for
previously reviewed or investigated
companies not listed above, including
NKK and SMI, the cash deposit rate will
continue to be the company–specific
rate established for the most recent
period; (3) if the exporter is not a firm
covered in this review, a prior review,
or the LTFV investigation, but the
manufacturer is, the cash deposit rate
will continue to be the rate established
for the most recent period for the
manufacturer of the subject
merchandise; and (4) if neither the
exporter nor the manufacturer is a firm
covered by this review, a prior review,
or the LTFV investigation, the cash
deposit rate shall be the ‘‘all others’’ rate
established in the LTFV investigation,
which is 44.20 percent. See Amended
Final Determination. These deposit
rates, when imposed, shall remain in
effect until publication of the final
results of the next administrative
review.
rmajette on DSK29S0YB1PROD with NOTICES6
NOTIFICATION TO IMPORTERS
This notice serves as a final reminder
to importers of their responsibility
under 19 CFR § 351.402(f) to file a
certificate regarding the reimbursement
of antidumping duties prior to
liquidation of the relevant entries
during this review period. Failure to
comply with this requirement could
result in the Secretary’s presumption
that reimbursement of antidumping
duties occurred and the subsequent
assessment of double antidumping
duties.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:46 Nov 10, 2010
Jkt 223001
ADMINISTRATIVE PROTECTIVE
ORDERS
This notice also serves as a reminder
to parties subject to administrative
protective orders (APOs) of their
responsibility concerning the return or
destruction of proprietary information
disclosed under APO in accordance
with 19 CFR § 351.305. Timely written
notification of the return/destruction of
APO materials or conversion to judicial
protective order is hereby requested.
Failure to comply with the regulations
and terms of an APO is a violation that
is subject to sanction.
This administrative review and notice
are issued and published in accordance
with sections 751(a)(1) and 777(i)(1) of
the Act.
Dated: December 23, 2005.
Stephen J. Claeys,
Acting Assistant Secretary for Import
Administration.
[FR Doc. E5–8215 Filed 12–30–05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–DS–S
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
(A–580–810, A–583–815)
Welded ASTM A–312 Stainless Steel
Pipe from South Korea and Taiwan:
Notice of Final Results of Expedited
(‘‘Sunset’’) Reviews of Antidumping
Duty Orders
AGENCY: Import Administration,
International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
SUMMARY: On September 1, 2005, the
Department of Commerce (‘‘the
Department’’) published a notice of
initiation of the second sunset reviews
of the antidumping duty orders on
welded ASTM A–312 stainless steel
pipe (‘‘WSSP’’) from South Korea
(‘‘Korea’’) and Taiwan, pursuant to
section 751(c) of the Tariff Act of 1930,
as amended (‘‘the Act’’). On the basis of
a notice of intent to participate and
adequate substantive responses from the
domestic interested parties and no
response from respondent interested
parties, the Department has conducted
expedited sunset reviews of these
antidumping duty orders. As a result of
these sunset reviews, the Department
finds that revocation of the antidumping
duty orders would likely lead to
continuation or recurrence of dumping
at the level indicated in the ‘‘Final
Results of Review’’ section of this notice.
EFFECTIVE DATE: January 3, 2006.
FOR INFORMATION CONTACT: Dana
Mermelstein or Martha Douthit, AD/
PO 00000
Frm 00011
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
CVD Operations, Office 6, Import
Administration, International Trade
Administration, U.S. Department of
Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution,
NW., Washington, DC 20230; telephone:
(202) 482–1391 or (202) 482–5050,
respectively.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
On September 1, 2005, the
Department published a notice of
initiation of the second sunset reviews
of the antidumping duty orders on
WSSP from Korea and Taiwan, pursuant
to section 751(c) of the Act. See
Initiation of Five-year (‘‘Sunset’’)
Reviews, 70 FR 52074 (September 1,
2005).
We received notices of intent to
participate, in each of the two sunset
reviews, on behalf of Bristol Metals, L.P.
and Marcegaglia U.S.A., Inc.
(collectively, ‘‘the domestic interested
parties’’), within the deadline specified
in section 351.218(d)(1)(i) of the
Department’s regulations. The domestic
interested parties claimed interested
party status as producers of the subject
merchandise pursuant to section
771(9)(C) of the Act. The domestic
interested parties were petitioners in the
original investigations, or successors to
petitioners, and have participated in
subsequent reviews.
On September 29, 2005, the
Department received complete
substantive responses to the notice of
initiation from the domestic interested
parties within the 30-day deadline
specified in section 351.218(d)(3)(i) of
the Department’s regulations. The
Department received no substantive
responses from respondent interested
parties. Based on these circumstances,
pursuant to sections 751(c)(3)(B) of the
Act and 351.218(e)(1)(ii)(C), the
Department has conducted expedited
reviews of these orders.
Scope of the Orders
The merchandise subject to each of
these antidumping duty orders is WSSP
that meets the standards and
specifications set forth by the American
Society for Testing and Materials
(‘‘ASTM’’) for the welded form of
chromium–nickel pipe designated
ASTM A–312. The merchandise covered
by the scope of each order also includes
austenitic welded stainless steel pipes
made according to the standards of
other nations which are comparable to
ASTM A–312. WSSP is produced by
forming stainless steel flat–rolled
products into a tubular configuration
and welding along the seam. WSSP is a
commodity product generally used as a
E:\FR\FM\03JAN1.SGM
03JAN1
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 1 / Tuesday, January 3, 2006 / Notices
conduit to transmit liquids or gases.
Major applications for steel pipe
include, but are not limited to, digester
lines, blow lines, pharmaceutical lines,
petrochemical stock lines, brewery
process and transport lines, general food
processing lines, automotive paint lines,
and paper process machines. Imports of
WSSP are currently classifiable under
the following Harmonized Tariff
Schedule of the United States (‘‘HTS’’)
subheadings: 7306.40.5005,
7306.40.5015, 7306.40.5040,
7306.40.5065, and 7306.40.5085.
Although these subheadings include
both pipes and tubes, the scope of these
antidumping duty orders is limited to
welded austenitic stainless steel pipes.
The HTS subheadings are provided
for convenience and Customs purposes,
our written description of the scope of
these orders is dispositive.
Analysis of Comments Received
All issues raised in substantive
responses by parties to these sunset
reviews are addressed in the Issues and
Decision Memorandum for Final Results
of Expedited (‘‘Sunset’’) Reviews of the
Antidumping Duty Orders on Welded
ASTM A–312 Stainless Steel Pipe from
South Korea and Taiwan, from Stephen
J. Claeys, Deputy Assistant Secretary for
Import Administration, to Joseph A.
Spetrini, Acting Assistant Secretary for
Import Administration (Decision
Memo), dated December 30, 2005,
which is hereby adopted by this notice.
The issues discussed in the Decision
Memo include the likelihood of
continuation or recurrence of dumping
and the magnitude of the margin likely
to prevail were the order revoked.
Parties can find a complete discussion
of all issues raised in these reviews and
the corresponding recommendations in
this public memorandum which is on
file in B–099, the Central Records Unit,
of the main Commerce building. In
addition, a complete version of the
Decision Memo can be accessed directly
on the Web at https://ia.doc.gov/frn. The
paper copy and electronic version of the
Decision Memo are identical in content.
rmajette on DSK29S0YB1PROD with NOTICES6
Final Results of Reviews
We determine that revocation of the
antidumping duty orders would be
likely to lead to continuation or
recurrence of dumping at the following
weighted–average margins:
review upon written request or by
appointment in the following office(s):
Permits, Conservation and Education
Weighted Average
Manufacturer/Exporter
Margins (percent) Division, Office of Protected Resources,
NMFS, 1315 East-West Highway, Room
Sammi Metal Products
13705, Silver Spring, MD 20910; phone
Co., Ltd. ......................
7.92
(301)713–2289, fax (301)427–2521; and
All Others ........................
7.00
Southeast Region, NMFS, 263 13th
Ave South, St. Petersburg, FL 33701;
phone (727)824–5312; fax (727)824–
TAIWAN
5309.
Weighted Average FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Manufacturer/Exporter
Margins (percent)
Patrick Opay or Amy Hapeman,
(301)713–2289.
Jaung Yuann Enterprise
Co., Ltd. ......................
31.90 SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The
Yeun Chyang Industrial
requested amendment has been granted
Co., Ltd. ......................
31.90 under the authority of the Endangered
All Others ........................
19.84 Species Act of 1973, as amended (ESA;
16 U.S.C. 1531 et seq.) and the
This notice also serves as the only
provisions of 50 CFR 222.306 of the
reminder to parties subject to
regulations governing the taking,
administrative protective orders (APO)
importing, and exporting of endangered
of their responsibility concerning the
and threatened fish and wildlife (50
return or destruction of proprietary
CFR 222–226).
information disclosed under APO in
The modification extends the
accordance with section 351.305 of the
expiration date of the permit from
Department’s regulations. Timely
December 31, 2005, to December 31,
notification of the return or destruction
2006, for takes of green (Chelonia
of APO materials or conversion to
mydas), loggerhead (Caretta caretta),
judicial protective order is hereby
olive ridley (Lepidochelys olivacea),
requested. Failure to comply with the
leatherback (Dermochelys coriacea),
regulations and terms of an APO is a
hawksbill (Eretmochelys imbricata) and
violation which is subject to sanction.
Kemp’s ridley (Lepidochelys kempii) sea
We are issuing and publishing this
turtles. The permit allows the SEFSC to
determination and notice in accordance conduct sea turtle bycatch reduction
with sections 751(c), 752, and 777(i) of
research in the pelagic longline fishery
the Act.
of the western north Atlantic Ocean.
The purpose of the research is to
Dated: December 23, 2005.
develop and test methods to reduce
Stephen J. Claeys,
bycatch that occurs incidental to
Acting Assistant Secretary for Import
commercial pelagic longline fishing.
Administration.
Issuance of this modification, as
[FR Doc. E5–8209 Filed 12–30–05; 8:45 am]
required by the ESA was based on a
BILLING CODE 3510–DS–S
finding that such permit: (1) was
applied for in good faith; (2) will not
operate to the disadvantage of any
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
threatened and endangered species; and
(3) is consistent with the purposes and
National Oceanic and Atmospheric
policies set forth in section 2 of the
Administration
ESA.
KOREA—Continued
[I.D. 121605C]
Endangered Species; Permit No. 1429
AGENCY: National Marine Fisheries
Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA),
Commerce.
ACTION: Notice; modification of
scientific research permit.
Notice is hereby given that a
request for modification of scientific
KOREA
research Permit No. 1429 submitted by
Weighted Average the National Marine Fisheries Service,
Manufacturer/Exporter
Margins (percent) Southeast Fisheries Science Center
(SEFSC) has been granted.
Pusan Steel Pipe Co.,
ADDRESSES: The modification and
Ltd. (now SeAH Steel
Corporation) ................
2.67 related documents are available for
SUMMARY:
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:46 Nov 10, 2010
Jkt 223001
97
PO 00000
Frm 00012
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Dated: December 22, 2005.
Steve Leathery,
Chief, Permits, Conservation and Education
Division, Office of Protected Resources,
National Marine Fisheries Service.
[FR Doc. E5–8219 Filed 12–30–05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–22–S
DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION
Open Meeting of the National Advisory
Council on Indian Education
AGENCY: National Advisory Council on
Indian Education (NACIE), DOE.
ACTION: Notice of teleconference
meeting.
E:\FR\FM\03JAN1.SGM
03JAN1
]]>Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 71, Number 1 (Tuesday, January 3, 2006)]
[Notices]
[Pages 96-97]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E5-8209]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
(A-580-810, A-583-815)
Welded ASTM A-312 Stainless Steel Pipe from South Korea and
Taiwan: Notice of Final Results of Expedited (``Sunset'') Reviews of
Antidumping Duty Orders
AGENCY: Import Administration, International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
SUMMARY: On September 1, 2005, the Department of Commerce (``the
Department'') published a notice of initiation of the second sunset
reviews of the antidumping duty orders on welded ASTM A-312 stainless
steel pipe (``WSSP'') from South Korea (``Korea'') and Taiwan, pursuant
to section 751(c) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (``the Act'').
On the basis of a notice of intent to participate and adequate
substantive responses from the domestic interested parties and no
response from respondent interested parties, the Department has
conducted expedited sunset reviews of these antidumping duty orders. As
a result of these sunset reviews, the Department finds that revocation
of the antidumping duty orders would likely lead to continuation or
recurrence of dumping at the level indicated in the ``Final Results of
Review'' section of this notice.
EFFECTIVE DATE: January 3, 2006.
FOR INFORMATION CONTACT: Dana Mermelstein or Martha Douthit, AD/CVD
Operations, Office 6, Import Administration, International Trade
Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 14\th\ Street and
Constitution, NW., Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482-1391 or
(202) 482-5050, respectively.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
On September 1, 2005, the Department published a notice of
initiation of the second sunset reviews of the antidumping duty orders
on WSSP from Korea and Taiwan, pursuant to section 751(c) of the Act.
See Initiation of Five-year (``Sunset'') Reviews, 70 FR 52074
(September 1, 2005).
We received notices of intent to participate, in each of the two
sunset reviews, on behalf of Bristol Metals, L.P. and Marcegaglia
U.S.A., Inc. (collectively, ``the domestic interested parties''),
within the deadline specified in section 351.218(d)(1)(i) of the
Department's regulations. The domestic interested parties claimed
interested party status as producers of the subject merchandise
pursuant to section 771(9)(C) of the Act. The domestic interested
parties were petitioners in the original investigations, or successors
to petitioners, and have participated in subsequent reviews.
On September 29, 2005, the Department received complete substantive
responses to the notice of initiation from the domestic interested
parties within the 30-day deadline specified in section
351.218(d)(3)(i) of the Department's regulations. The Department
received no substantive responses from respondent interested parties.
Based on these circumstances, pursuant to sections 751(c)(3)(B) of the
Act and 351.218(e)(1)(ii)(C), the Department has conducted expedited
reviews of these orders.
Scope of the Orders
The merchandise subject to each of these antidumping duty orders is
WSSP that meets the standards and specifications set forth by the
American Society for Testing and Materials (``ASTM'') for the welded
form of chromium-nickel pipe designated ASTM A-312. The merchandise
covered by the scope of each order also includes austenitic welded
stainless steel pipes made according to the standards of other nations
which are comparable to ASTM A-312. WSSP is produced by forming
stainless steel flat-rolled products into a tubular configuration and
welding along the seam. WSSP is a commodity product generally used as a
[[Page 97]]
conduit to transmit liquids or gases. Major applications for steel pipe
include, but are not limited to, digester lines, blow lines,
pharmaceutical lines, petrochemical stock lines, brewery process and
transport lines, general food processing lines, automotive paint lines,
and paper process machines. Imports of WSSP are currently classifiable
under the following Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States
(``HTS'') subheadings: 7306.40.5005, 7306.40.5015, 7306.40.5040,
7306.40.5065, and 7306.40.5085. Although these subheadings include both
pipes and tubes, the scope of these antidumping duty orders is limited
to welded austenitic stainless steel pipes.
The HTS subheadings are provided for convenience and Customs
purposes, our written description of the scope of these orders is
dispositive.
Analysis of Comments Received
All issues raised in substantive responses by parties to these
sunset reviews are addressed in the Issues and Decision Memorandum for
Final Results of Expedited (``Sunset'') Reviews of the Antidumping Duty
Orders on Welded ASTM A-312 Stainless Steel Pipe from South Korea and
Taiwan, from Stephen J. Claeys, Deputy Assistant Secretary for Import
Administration, to Joseph A. Spetrini, Acting Assistant Secretary for
Import Administration (Decision Memo), dated December 30, 2005, which
is hereby adopted by this notice. The issues discussed in the Decision
Memo include the likelihood of continuation or recurrence of dumping
and the magnitude of the margin likely to prevail were the order
revoked.
Parties can find a complete discussion of all issues raised in
these reviews and the corresponding recommendations in this public
memorandum which is on file in B-099, the Central Records Unit, of the
main Commerce building. In addition, a complete version of the Decision
Memo can be accessed directly on the Web at https://ia.doc.gov/frn. The
paper copy and electronic version of the Decision Memo are identical in
content.
Final Results of Reviews
We determine that revocation of the antidumping duty orders would
be likely to lead to continuation or recurrence of dumping at the
following weighted-average margins:
Korea
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Weighted Average
Manufacturer/Exporter Margins (percent)
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Pusan Steel Pipe Co., Ltd. (now SeAH Steel 2.67
Corporation)........................................
Sammi Metal Products Co., Ltd........................ 7.92
All Others........................................... 7.00
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Taiwan
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Weighted Average
Manufacturer/Exporter Margins (percent)
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Jaung Yuann Enterprise Co., Ltd...................... 31.90
Yeun Chyang Industrial Co., Ltd...................... 31.90
All Others........................................... 19.84
------------------------------------------------------------------------
This notice also serves as the only reminder to parties subject to
administrative protective orders (APO) of their responsibility
concerning the return or destruction of proprietary information
disclosed under APO in accordance with section 351.305 of the
Department's regulations. Timely notification of the return or
destruction of APO materials or conversion to judicial protective order
is hereby requested. Failure to comply with the regulations and terms
of an APO is a violation which is subject to sanction.
We are issuing and publishing this determination and notice in
accordance with sections 751(c), 752, and 777(i) of the Act.
Dated: December 23, 2005.
Stephen J. Claeys,
Acting Assistant Secretary for Import Administration.
[FR Doc. E5-8209 Filed 12-30-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-S
