Fee Adjustments for Testing, Evaluation, and Approval of Mining Products, 77427-77428 [05-24691]
Download as PDF
<![CDATA[
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 250 / Friday, December 30, 2005 / Notices
including names and home addresses of
respondents, available for public
review. Individual respondents may
request that we withhold their home
address from public disclosure, which
we will honor to the extent allowable by
law. There also may be circumstances in
which we would withhold a
respondent’s identity from public
disclosure, as allowable by law. If you
wish us to withhold your name and/or
address, you must state this
prominently at the beginning of your
comment. We will make all submissions
from organizations or businesses, and
from individuals identifying themselves
as representatives or officials of
organizations or businesses, available
for public disclosure in their entirety.
Dated: December 21, 2005.
Donald E. Moomaw,
Assistant Regional Director, Great Plains
Region.
[FR Doc. 05–24646 Filed 12–29–05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310–MN–P
DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
Office of the Secretary
Submission for OMB Review;
Comment Request
wwhite on PROD1PC61 with NOTICES
December 22, 2005.
The Department of Labor (DOL) has
submitted the following public
information collection request (ICR) to
the Office of Management and Budget
(OMB) for review and approval in
accordance with the Paperwork
Reduction Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104–13,
44 U.S.C chapter 35). A copy of this ICR,
with applicable supporting
documentation, may be obtained by
contacting Darrin King on 202–693–
4129 (this is not a toll-free number) or
e-mail: king.darrin@dol.gov.
Comments should be sent to Office of
Information and Regulatory Affairs,
Attn: OMB Desk Officer for the
Occupational Safety and Health
Administration (OSHA), Office of
Management and Budget, Room 10235,
Washington, DC 20503, 202–395–7316
(this is not a toll-free number), within
30 days from the date of this publication
in the Federal Register, the OMB is
particularly interested in comments
which:
• Evaluate whether the proposed
collection of information is necessary
for the proper performance of the
functions of the agency, including
whether the information will have
practical utility;
• Evaluate the accuracy of the
agency’s estimate of the burden of the
proposed collection of information,
VerDate Aug<31>2005
21:02 Dec 29, 2005
Jkt 205001
including the validity of the
methodology and assumptions used;
• Enhance the quality, utility, and
clarity of the information to be
collected; and
• Minimize the burden of the
collection of information on those who
are to respond, including through the
use of appropriate automated,
electronic, mechanical, or other
technological collection techniques or
other forms of information technology,
e.g., permitting electronic submission of
responses.
Agency: Occupational Safety and
Health Administration.
Type of Review: Extension of
currently approved collection.
Title: The 13 Carcinogens Standard
(29 CFR 1910.1003, 1915.1003, and
1926.1103).
OMB Number: 1218–0085.
Frequency: On occasion and
Annually.
Type of Response: Recordkeeping and
Third party disclosure.
Affected Public: Business or other forprofit; Not-for-profit institutions;
Federal Government; and State, Local,
or Tribal Government.
Number of Respondents: 97.
Number of Annual Responses: 2,187.
Estimated Time Per Response: Time
per response ranges from approximately
5 minutes (for employers to maintain
records) to 2 hours for employees to
receive a medical examination.
Total Burden Hours: 1,657.
Total Annualized capital/startup
costs: $0.
Total Annual Costs (operating/
maintaining systems or purchasing
services): $86,227.
Description: The information
collection requirements specified in the
13 Carcinogens Standard protect
employees from the adverse health
effects that may result from exposure to
any of the 13 carcinogens. The major
information collection requirements of
the 13 Carcinogens Standard include:
Establishing and implementing
respiratory protection and medical
surveillance programs for employees
assigned to or being considered for
assignment to regulated areas;
maintaining complete and accurate
records of the respiratory protection
programs and medical surveillance;
providing employees with records of all
medical examination results; and
posting warning signs and information.
In addition, employers must retain
employee medical records for specified
time periods, provide these records to
OSHA and the National Institute for
Occupational Safety and Health
(NIOSH) upon request, and transfer
PO 00000
Frm 00056
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
77427
them to NIOSH under certain
circumstances.
Ira L. Mills,
Departmental Clearance Officer.
[FR Doc. 05–24648 Filed 12–29–05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510–26–M
DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
Mine Safety and Health Administration
Fee Adjustments for Testing,
Evaluation, and Approval of Mining
Products
Mine Safety and Health
Administration (MSHA), Labor.
ACTION: Notice of fee adjustments.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: This notice revises MSHA’s
Approval and Certification Center
(A&CC) user fees for services provided
pursuant to part 5 of Title 30 of the
Code of Federal Regulations (CFR)
during 2006. Fees compensate MSHA
for the costs that the agency incurs for
testing and evaluating equipment and
materials manufactured for use in the
mining industry. The fees for 2006 are
based on the Agency’s fiscal year 2005
actual expenses.
DATES: This fee schedule is effective
from January 1, 2006 through December
31, 2006.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Steven J. Luzik, Chief, Approval and
Certification Center (A&CC), 304–547–
2029 or 304–547–0400.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Fee Computation
MSHA has revised its fee schedule for
2006 in accordance with part 5 of 30
CFR, which was amended by a direct
final rule published in the Federal
Register (70 FR 46336) on August 9,
2005. For approval applications
postmarked before January 1, 2006,
MSHA will continue to calculate fees
under the previous (2005) fee schedule,
published on December 29, 2004 (69 FR
78046).
In general, MSHA computed the 2006
fees based on fiscal year 2005 data. The
Agency calculated a weighted-average,
direct cost for all of the services that it
provided during fiscal year 2005 in the
processing of requests for testing,
evaluation, and approval of equipment
and materials manufactured for use in
the mining industry. From this cost,
MSHA calculated a single hourly rate to
apply uniformly.
Changes to Fee Assessments for 2006
On November 7, 2005, MSHA’s direct
final rule became effective (70 FR
67632). This final rule amended part 5
E:\FR\FM\30DEN1.SGM
30DEN1
77428
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 250 / Friday, December 30, 2005 / Notices
Facility Operating Licenses Nos. DPR–
38, DPR–47, and DPR–55 and NRC
Materials License No. SNM–2503 for the
Oconee Nuclear Station, Units 1, 2, and
3, currently held by Duke Energy
Corporation, as owner and licensed
operator of Oconee Nuclear Station,
Units 1, 2, and 3. The indirect transfer
would be to a new holding company to
be named Duke Energy Corporation. The
Commission is also considering
amending the licenses for
administrative purposes to reflect the
proposed change of the name of the
licensee from Duke Energy Corporation
to Duke Power Company LLC.
According to an application for
approval filed by Duke Energy
Corporation, following approval of the
Dated: December 28, 2005.
proposed indirect license transfers, a
Robert M. Friend,
new holding company would be created
Acting Deputy Assistant Secretary for Mine
to become the parent of the licensee. No
Safety and Health.
physical changes to the Oconee Nuclear
Station, Units 1, 2, and 3, facility or
FEE SCHEDULE EFFECTIVE JANUARY 1, ISFSI or operational changes are being
2006
proposed in the application.
The proposed amendments would
[Based on FY 2005 data]
reflect the proposed change in the name
Hourly of the licensee from Duke Energy
Action title
rate
Corporation to Duke Power Company
LLC, following the licensee’s conversion
Fees for Testing, Evaluation, Apfrom a corporation to a limited liability
proval and Retesting for Approval
company. Although the Part 50 licenses
as a Result of Post-Approval
contain antitrust conditions, there are
Product Audit of all Mining Products 1 .............................................
$71 no proposed changes to these
conditions.
1 Full approval fee consists of evaluation
Pursuant to 10 CFR 50.80 and 10 CFR
cost plus applicable test costs.
72.50, no license, or any right
thereunder, shall be transferred, directly
Note: When the nature of the product
or indirectly, through transfer of control
requires that MSHA test and evaluate the
of the license, unless the Commission
product at a location other than on MSHA
premises, MSHA must be reimbursed for the
shall give its consent in writing. The
travel, subsistence, and incidental expenses
Commission will approve an
of its representative in accordance with
application for the indirect transfer of a
Federal government travel regulations. This
license, if the Commission determines
reimbursement is in addition to the fees
that the proposed underlying
charged for evaluation and testing.
transaction resulting in the indirect
[FR Doc. 05–24691 Filed 12–29–05; 8:45 am]
transfer will not affect the qualifications
of the holder of the license, and that the
BILLING CODE 4510–43–P
indirect transfer is otherwise consistent
with applicable provisions of law,
regulations, and orders issued by the
NUCLEAR REGULATORY
Commission pursuant thereto.
COMMISSION
Before issuance of the proposed
[Docket Nos. 50–269, 50–270, 50–287, and
conforming license amendments, the
72–004]
Commission will have made findings
required by the Atomic Energy Act of
Duke Energy Corporation; Oconee
1954, as amended (the Act), and the
Nuclear Station, Units 1, 2, and 3;
Notice of Consideration of Approval of Commission’s regulations.
As provided in 10 CFR 2.1315, unless
Application Regarding Proposed
otherwise determined by the
Corporate Restructuring and
Commission with regard to a specific
Conforming Amendments, and
application, the Commission has
Opportunity for a Hearing
determined that any amendment to the
The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory
license of a utilization facility or to the
Commission (the Commission) is
license of an independent spent fuel
considering the issuance of an order
storage installation which does no more
under 10 CFR 50.80 and 72.50
than conform the license to reflect the
approving the indirect transfer of
indirect transfer action involves no
wwhite on PROD1PC61 with NOTICES
to reflect established policy and
procedures for administering user fees.
In addition, the final rule advised the
public that the fees relating to part 15
testing of explosives would be modified.
In recent years, MSHA has relied on the
Department of Health and Human
Services’ National Institute for
Occupational Safety and Health
(NIOSH) to conduct part 15 testing on
its behalf. Since NIOSH no longer has
the facilities to conduct all of the part
15 tests, the tests will be contracted out
to other organizations. For additional
information regarding part 15 testing,
please contact Steven J. Luzik, Chief,
Approval and Certification Center, 304–
547–2029 or 304–547–0400.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
18:16 Dec 29, 2005
Jkt 208001
PO 00000
Frm 00057
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
significant hazards consideration or no
genuine issue as to whether the health
and safety of the public will be
significantly affected. No contrary
determination has been made with
respect to this specific license
amendment application. In light of the
generic determination reflected in 10
CFR 2.1315, no public comments with
respect to significant hazards
considerations are being solicited,
notwithstanding the general comment
procedures contained in 10 CFR 50.91.
The filing of requests for hearing and
petitions for leave to intervene, and
written comments with regard to the
license transfer application, are
discussed below.
Within 20 days from the date of
publication of this notice, any person
whose interest may be affected by the
Commission’s action on the application
may request a hearing and, if not the
applicant, may petition for leave to
intervene in a hearing proceeding on the
Commission’s action. Requests for a
hearing and petitions for leave to
intervene should be filed in accordance
with the Commission’s rules of practice
set forth in Subpart C ‘‘Rules of General
Applicability: Hearing Requests,
Petitions to Intervene, Availability of
Documents, Selection of Specific
Hearing Procedures, Presiding Officer
Powers, and General Hearing
Management for NRC Adjudicatory
Hearings,’’ of 10 CFR Part 2. In
particular, such requests and petitions
must comply with the requirements set
forth in 10 CFR 2.309. Untimely
requests and petitions may be denied, as
provided in 10 CFR 2.309(c)(1), unless
good cause for failure to file on time is
established. In addition, an untimely
request or petition should address the
factors that the Commission will also
consider, in reviewing untimely
requests or petitions, set forth in 10 CFR
2.309(c)(1)(i)–(viii).
Requests for a hearing and petitions
for leave to intervene should be served
upon Timika Shafeek-Horton, Assistant
General Counsel, Duke Energy Law
Department, Mail Code EC07H–7109,
P.O. Box 1006, 526 South Church St.,
Charlotte, NC 28201–1006, (704) 382–
6373, (704) 382–6056 fax; the General
Counsel, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory
Commission, Washington, DC 20555–
0001 (e-mail address for filings
regarding license transfer cases only:
OGCLT@NRC.gov); and the Secretary of
the Commission, U.S. Nuclear
Regulatory Commission, Washington,
DC 20555–0001, Attention: Rulemakings
and Adjudications Staff, in accordance
with 10 CFR 2.302 and 2.305.
The Commission will issue a notice or
order granting or denying a hearing
E:\FR\FM\30DEN1.SGM
30DEN1
]]>Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 250 (Friday, December 30, 2005)]
[Notices]
[Pages 77427-77428]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-24691]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
Mine Safety and Health Administration
Fee Adjustments for Testing, Evaluation, and Approval of Mining
Products
AGENCY: Mine Safety and Health Administration (MSHA), Labor.
ACTION: Notice of fee adjustments.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: This notice revises MSHA's Approval and Certification Center
(A&CC) user fees for services provided pursuant to part 5 of Title 30
of the Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) during 2006. Fees compensate
MSHA for the costs that the agency incurs for testing and evaluating
equipment and materials manufactured for use in the mining industry.
The fees for 2006 are based on the Agency's fiscal year 2005 actual
expenses.
DATES: This fee schedule is effective from January 1, 2006 through
December 31, 2006.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Steven J. Luzik, Chief, Approval and
Certification Center (A&CC), 304-547-2029 or 304-547-0400.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Fee Computation
MSHA has revised its fee schedule for 2006 in accordance with part
5 of 30 CFR, which was amended by a direct final rule published in the
Federal Register (70 FR 46336) on August 9, 2005. For approval
applications postmarked before January 1, 2006, MSHA will continue to
calculate fees under the previous (2005) fee schedule, published on
December 29, 2004 (69 FR 78046).
In general, MSHA computed the 2006 fees based on fiscal year 2005
data. The Agency calculated a weighted-average, direct cost for all of
the services that it provided during fiscal year 2005 in the processing
of requests for testing, evaluation, and approval of equipment and
materials manufactured for use in the mining industry. From this cost,
MSHA calculated a single hourly rate to apply uniformly.
Changes to Fee Assessments for 2006
On November 7, 2005, MSHA's direct final rule became effective (70
FR 67632). This final rule amended part 5
[[Page 77428]]
to reflect established policy and procedures for administering user
fees. In addition, the final rule advised the public that the fees
relating to part 15 testing of explosives would be modified. In recent
years, MSHA has relied on the Department of Health and Human Services'
National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH) to
conduct part 15 testing on its behalf. Since NIOSH no longer has the
facilities to conduct all of the part 15 tests, the tests will be
contracted out to other organizations. For additional information
regarding part 15 testing, please contact Steven J. Luzik, Chief,
Approval and Certification Center, 304-547-2029 or 304-547-0400.
Dated: December 28, 2005.
Robert M. Friend,
Acting Deputy Assistant Secretary for Mine Safety and Health.
Fee Schedule Effective January 1, 2006
[Based on FY 2005 data]
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Hourly
Action title rate
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Fees for Testing, Evaluation, Approval and Retesting for $71
Approval as a Result of Post-Approval Product Audit of all
Mining Products \1\...........................................
------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ Full approval fee consists of evaluation cost plus applicable test
costs.
Note: When the nature of the product requires that MSHA test and
evaluate the product at a location other than on MSHA premises, MSHA
must be reimbursed for the travel, subsistence, and incidental
expenses of its representative in accordance with Federal government
travel regulations. This reimbursement is in addition to the fees
charged for evaluation and testing.
[FR Doc. 05-24691 Filed 12-29-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510-43-P
