Training Standards for Shaft and Slope Construction Workers at Underground Mines and Surface Areas of Underground Mines, 77716-77728 [05-24624]
Download as PDF
77716
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 250 / Friday, December 30, 2005 / Rules and Regulations
DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
Mine Safety and Health Administration
30 CFR Part 48
RIN 1219–AB35
Training Standards for Shaft and Slope
Construction Workers at Underground
Mines and Surface Areas of
Underground Mines
Mine Safety and Health
Administration (MSHA), Labor.
ACTION: Final rule.
AGENCY:
wwhite on PROD1PC65 with RULES4
SUMMARY: We (MSHA) are revising
certain provisions of our regulations
addressing the training and retraining of
miners. This final rule removes the
training exclusion for shaft and slope
construction workers. Shaft and slope
construction workers will now receive
training for new miners, training for
experienced miners, task training,
annual refresher training, and hazard
training. The rule will provide shaft and
slope construction workers with the
same type of safety and health training
afforded other miners.
EFFECTIVE DATE: This regulation is
effective June 28, 2006, except that
§§ 48.3(o) and 48.23(o) are effective
December 30, 2005.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Rebecca J. Smith, Acting Director, Office
of Standards, Regulations and
Variances, MSHA; 1100 Wilson
Boulevard, Room 2350, Arlington,
Virginia 22209–3939; telephone (202)
693–9440; e-mail:
Smith.Rebecca@dol.gov; or facsimile
(202) 693–9441. The final rule is
available on the Internet at https://
www.msha.gov/REGINFO.HTM.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The
preamble to this final rule discusses the
proposed requirements for training shaft
and slope construction workers,
comments received on the proposed
rule, our analysis of accident and injury
data, and the section-by-section
discussion of our final rule
determinations. To help the reader, the
preamble discussion follows this
outline:
I. Background
II. Discussion of Final Rule
A. Introduction
—Analysis of accident and injury data
—Comparative tasks and hazards
—Diverse small and mobile crews
—Applicability of part 48 training
1. Miners’ Rights
2. Self-Rescue and Respiratory Devices
3. Entering and Leaving the Mine;
Transportation; Communications
4. Introduction to the Work Environment
5. Mine Map; Escapeways; Emergency
Evacuation; Barricading
VerDate Aug<31>2005
20:02 Dec 29, 2005
Jkt 208001
6. Roof or Ground Control and Ventilation
Plans
7. Health
8. Clean-Up; Rock Dusting
9. Hazard Recognition
10. Electrical Hazards
11. First Aid
12. Mine Gases
13. Health and Safety Aspects of Tasks
14. Other Courses Required by the District
Manager
—Compliance Assistance
B. Section-by-Section Analysis
1. Sections 48.2(a)(1) and 48.22(a)(1)
Definitions
—Clarification of terms
—Coverage of all construction workers and
Subpart C
—Comprehensive training or hazard training
—Applicability of Part 48 subpart A training
(Underground) and subpart B training
(Surface)
2. Sections 48.2(b)(4) and 48.22(b)(4)
‘‘Experienced Miner’’
—Qualifications and grandfather provision
3. Sections 48.3 and 48.23 Training Plans
a. Shaft and Slope Training Plans
b. Training Plan Development, Submission
and Approval
c. Training Programs and Hours
d. Crediting Prior Training and Experience
e. Approved Instructors
4. Sections 48.8 and 48.28 Annual
Refresher Training
5. Effective Date
III. Executive Order 12866
IV. Feasibility
V. Regulatory Flexibility Act Certification
VI. Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995
VII. Other Regulatory Considerations
A. The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
B. National Environmental Policy Act
C. The Treasury and General Government
Appropriations Act of 1999: Assessment
of Federal Regulations and Policies on
Families
D. Executive Order 12630: Government
Actions and Interference With
Constitutionally Protected Property
Rights
E. Executive Order 12988: Civil Justice
Reform
F. Executive Order 13045: Protection of
Children From Environmental Health
and Safety Risks
G. Executive Order 13132: Federalism
H. Executive Order 13175: Consultation
and Coordination With Indian Tribal
Governments
I. Executive Order 13211: Actions
Concerning Regulations That
Significantly Affect Energy, Supply,
Distribution, or Use
J. Executive Order 13272: Proper
Consideration of Small Entities in
Agency Rulemaking
VIII. Regulatory Text
I. Background
On October 13, 1978, we promulgated
regulations concerning the training and
retraining of miners in Title 30 Code of
Federal Regulations (CFR) part 48 (43
FR 47453), as provided for in section
115 of the Federal Mine Safety and
PO 00000
Frm 00002
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
Health Act of 1977 (Mine Act), 30 U.S.C.
825. Section 115(d) also provided that
the Secretary of Labor promulgate
‘‘appropriate standards for safety and
health training for coal or other
construction workers.’’ Accordingly, we
determined that certain underground
mine construction workers were
exposed to significant mining hazards in
ongoing operations, and included those
construction workers under the
coverage of part 48 training standards
published in 1978. However, we
specifically excluded from the coverage
certain other construction workers
including shaft and slope construction
workers.
On September 30, 1999, we published
a final rule, 30 CFR part 46, (64 FR
53080), containing training
requirements for specific sectors of the
mining industry, including shell
dredging, sand, gravel, surface stone,
surface clay, colloidal phosphate, and
surface limestone mines. That rule
covers, among other miners,
construction workers who are exposed
to hazards of mining operations.
Following the January 2003 accident
that occurred during shaft construction
at the McElroy Mine, we reviewed mine
fatality records from January 1982
through August 2003. The review
indicated that miners performing shaft
and slope construction work should
receive the same training as other
underground and surface miners. On
July 16, 2004, we proposed to remove
the part 48 training exclusion for shaft
and slope construction workers (69 FR
42841). Under the proposed rule, shaft
and slope construction workers would
be treated like extraction and
production miners and subject to the
part 48 training requirements.
The public was invited to submit
comments. We held hearings in Salt
Lake City, Utah on August 24, 2004, and
Arlington, Virginia on August 26, 2004.
The hearing record remained open until
September 14, 2004 for post-hearing
comments. Eight persons presented oral
comments at the hearings, and we
received six written comments. Most of
the commenters were from the shaft and
slope construction industry. All of the
comments have been considered in the
development of this final rule.
II. Discussion of Final Rule
A. Introduction
The final rule eliminates the part 48
training exclusion found in
§§ 48.2(a)(1)(i) and 48.22(a)(1)(i) for
shaft and slope construction workers.
‘‘Shaft and slope construction workers’’
include ‘‘shaft and slope workers’’ and
‘‘workers engaged in construction
E:\FR\FM\30DER4.SGM
30DER4
77717
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 250 / Friday, December 30, 2005 / Rules and Regulations
activities ancillary to shaft and slope
sinking.’’ Under this final rule, these
miners will receive comprehensive
safety and health training like other
miners who are significantly exposed to
mining hazards. Shaft and slope
construction operators, like other mine
operators, must train their miners
according to an MSHA approved
training plan.
There is a clear need for this rule. As
discussed in the preamble to the
proposed rule (64 FR 42841), we
reviewed mine accident fatality records
from January 1982 through August 2003.
In that period, there were 15 fatalities
among miners performing shaft and
slope construction work, including the
shaft construction accident at McElroy
Mine in West Virginia in January 2003
that took the lives of three miners. One
commenter took exception to the
inclusion in our fatality data of four
miners who were fatally injured in
capping a shaft at the Blacksville No. 1
mine in 1992. The commenter
contended that this event involved
construction work in and around a
surface mine, and had nothing to do
with the actual mining process or the
development of the shaft. While it is
true that the operator was closing a
shaft, we believe that shaft construction
can reasonably include such additional
construction necessary to effect closure.
Some commenters maintained that
this rule is not appropriate for the shaft
and slope construction industry. They
said that the rule would be burdensome
and our estimated costs were too low. In
calculating the costs of the proposed
rule, we used mining industry-wide
data as the basis for turnover rate,
retention rate, and miners’ level of
experience. The commenters, however,
disputed these assumptions as
inaccurate for the shaft and slope sector.
Based on their comments and our
reanalysis of the data, we have
recalculated the costs of the rule and,
while having increased our cost
estimates, we have concluded that the
rule is economically feasible, as
explained in Section III in this preamble
and in the Regulatory Economic
Analysis (REA).
Analysis of Accident and Injury Data
Commenters were concerned about
the appropriateness of the 40 hour new
underground miner training
requirement. In response to these
comments, we further analyzed the
accident rate data for new miners
obtained from our part 50 database
(Notification, Investigation, Reports and
Records of Accidents, Injuries, Illnesses,
Employment, and Coal Production in
Mines) for the period January 1994
through March 14, 2005. Mine operators
and independent contractors, including
shaft and slope construction operators,
are required to file these reports.
The purpose of this analysis was to
further evaluate the need for
comprehensive training. This analysis is
a snapshot of a subset of the current
shaft and slope industry. It is indicative
of safety performance.
There were 219,703 accidents
reported in the period, January 1994 to
March 14, 2005. For comparative
purposes we did a separate analysis of:
(1) Employee accidents from all mining
operations, (2) six shaft and slope
construction companies, five of which,
according to one commenter
represented the majority of the shaft and
slope industry, and (3) all independent
contractors excluding the six shaft and
slope construction companies. We
eliminated all records where no data
was entered in the field for ‘‘Total
Mining Experience.’’ We counted all
reported accidents of miners, shaft and
slope construction workers, and
independent contractors with one year
or less of total mining experience. Table
1 outlines the results of our analysis:
TABLE 1.—REPORTED ACCIDENTS—MINERS WITH LESS THAN ONE YEAR OF TOTAL MINING EXPERIENCE
Total accidents reported
Class
Mine Employees 1 ........................................................................................................................
Independent Contractor Employees 2 ..........................................................................................
Shaft and Slope Employees ........................................................................................................
1 Excludes
2 Excludes
1 year or less
161,160
11,542
583
19,783
3,699
257
Percent
12.27
32.05
44.08
independent contractors and the six shaft and slope construction companies.
shaft and slope construction companies.
We found that in the mining industry,
excluding all independent contractors,
new miners account for 12.27% of the
total reported accidents for that group.
For independent contractors, excluding
shaft and slope companies, new miners
were involved in 32.05% of the total. By
contrast, new shaft and slope
construction workers accounted for
44.08% of the total accidents reported
for that group.
We further reviewed the nonfatal days
lost (NFDL) injury incidence rate for six
shaft and slope construction companies,
and compared their rates to the average
rates for all underground and surface
areas of underground coal mines and
metal/nonmetal mines. These incidence
rates, which represent the number of
NFDL injuries per 200,000 miner hours,
are calculated from the part 50 accident
reports submitted to us and cover
injuries of all miners, including
experienced miners. The results are
summarized in Table 2.
TABLE 2.—NFDL INCIDENCE RATES
Metal UG &
surf. at UG
operations
wwhite on PROD1PC65 with RULES4
Year
2003
2002
2001
2000
1999
1998
1997
1996
.............................................................................................................................................
.............................................................................................................................................
.............................................................................................................................................
.............................................................................................................................................
.............................................................................................................................................
.............................................................................................................................................
.............................................................................................................................................
.............................................................................................................................................
VerDate Aug<31>2005
21:15 Dec 29, 2005
Jkt 205001
PO 00000
Frm 00003
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
E:\FR\FM\30DER4.SGM
3.98
3.69
3.82
5.38
5.82
6.09
5.48
6.31
30DER4
Coal UG &
surf. at UG
operations
6.44
7.44
7.32
8.34
8.16
8.82
8.28
8.7
Shaft & slope
9.45
16.79
9.72
18.66
20.26
13.37
10.44
15.93
77718
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 250 / Friday, December 30, 2005 / Rules and Regulations
TABLE 2.—NFDL INCIDENCE RATES—Continued
Metal UG &
surf. at UG
operations
Year
1995 .............................................................................................................................................
provided the same comprehensive
training as other miners.
We received comments suggesting
that the hazards shaft and slope
construction workers face are
distinguishable from those faced by
The injury rate for shaft and slope
construction is higher than the rest of
the mining industry. The results from
both tables 1 and 2 indicate that shaft
and slope work is dangerous and that
shaft and slope miners should be
5.79
Coal UG & ≤
surf. at UG
operations
Shaft & slope
10.18
13.7
other miners. To address these
comments, we further reviewed the data
from January 1994 through March 14,
2005 for the type of accident
classifications these three groups had
reported. Table 3 outlines the findings.
TABLE 3.—TOP FIVE ACCIDENT CLASSIFICATIONS
Ranking
1
2
3
4
5
.............................................
.............................................
.............................................
.............................................
.............................................
Handling of Materials ..............................................................
Slip or Fall Of Person .............................................................
Machinery ...............................................................................
Handtools (nonpowered) ........................................................
Powered Haulage ...................................................................
As indicated in Table 3, mining
operations, independent contractors,
and shaft and slope construction
operations have the same top five
accident classifications. While the
comparative percentages may vary
between mining sectors, the data
generally indicate the similarities in
accident types throughout mining,
including shaft and slope construction.
One commenter said that hazards
from working at heights distinguish
shaft and slope construction from other
mining. Yet, the data in Table 3 suggest
that, to the extent slip and fall hazards
correlate to heights, all miners
experience about the same percentage of
slip and fall accidents.
wwhite on PROD1PC65 with RULES4
Comparative Tasks and Hazards
In proposing the rule, we found that
the tasks performed and hazards
encountered by shaft and slope
construction workers were similar to
those of other miners already covered
under the part 48 training provisions.
Commenters stated, however, that shaft
and slope work is unique from mining
and should have its own training
requirements. They said that special
training requirements for their industry
should be incorporated under a new
part 48, subpart C. Commenters said
that shaft and slope construction work
is like other mine construction work
and differs from mining. Specifically,
the commenters noted particular tasks
and hazards characteristic of shaft and
slope work, which takes place in a
‘‘vertical environment.’’ The
VerDate Aug<31>2005
20:02 Dec 29, 2005
Mining
operations
(percent)
Accident classification
Jkt 208001
commenters also cited hazards incident
to heights, lifting, uneven ground, pinch
points, chemicals, noise, mine gases,
compressed air, hoisting, and electricity.
But these hazards are found in other
types of mining operations, where
miners work in confined spaces, handle
materials, work in proximity to mobile
equipment, and with and around wire
rope, and explosives and blasting and
encounter falling or sloughing material
from roof and ribs.
The commenters also mentioned
certain tasks specific to shaft and slope
construction, including welding,
hoisting, drilling, blasting, and
mucking. While there may be some
tasks that are more characteristic, in
degree or kind, to shaft and slope work,
similar tasks are conducted at other
mining operations. For example, in
many cases shotcreting and mucking
done in shaft and slope work is like
shotcreting and mucking done by
‘‘muckers’’ in other mining operations.
Both shaft and slope construction
operations and active mines drill, blast,
and muck.
Diverse Small and Mobile Crews
Commenters described a diverse shaft
and slope construction industry,
encompassing various locales, projects,
mining methods and crews. The
commenters were concerned that one
type of training would not fit all.
Mining operations, which are already
subject to part 48, range from massive
underground coal mines to small
surface hard rock operations in remote
PO 00000
Frm 00004
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
32.44
18.19
13.49
12.46
8.74
Independent
contractors
(percent)
31.87
20.74
14.95
11.68
9.33
Shaft & slope
construction
operations
(percent)
27.24
17.90
26.46
6.23
5.45
areas. These mining operations employ
a variety of mining methods and tasks,
exposing miners to a broad array of
safety and health hazards that are
addressed under the flexible training
approach of part 48. Similarly, part 48
applies to different types of mine
operators in different settings, including
a variety of independent contractors
who are on mine property temporarily.
Some mobile equipment operators, for
example, travel to different sites, and
may not have a formal office. For over
26 years, part 48 has successfully
covered mining operations of varying
sizes, locations, circumstances, and
conditions.
Commenters pointed to high turnover
rates in certain types of shaft and slope
construction operations, especially
conventional underground work. They
were especially concerned about the
availability of trained labor in remote
areas. Shaft and slope crews may be
small, they said, and dependent upon
all miners showing up ready to work for
the project to progress on time.
There are many independent
contractors in mining working in small
crews. It is our understanding that these
mining operations may hire from a local
labor force that has already received 32
hours of underground new miner
training. The training may be provided
through vocational-technical schools or
cooperative programs. Typically, where
state grant programs provide this
training, they offer 32 hours of new
miner training for underground mining
at a reasonable cost or for no cost. With
E:\FR\FM\30DER4.SGM
30DER4
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 250 / Friday, December 30, 2005 / Rules and Regulations
32 hours of training completed, 8 hours
of mine site training are given by the
operator. These new miner training
programs available to the industry have
helped create the labor pool that
operators may draw from quickly.
We are mindful that causes for crew
shortages extend beyond turnover and
training, for example, sickness and
personal emergencies. Short-term crew
shortages commonly are handled by
cross-shifting the miners.
We expect training may facilitate a
ready labor pool. Training could alert
prospective miners about a job that is
not right for them, causing them to
withdraw from consideration. By taking
the initiative to be trained, new miners
may be less likely to prematurely leave
a job for which they have invested an
amount of time and possibly money
prior to employment. Further,
contractors may retroactively
compensate miners for the training costs
after working a specified period of time.
This may reduce the high turnover rates
experienced by the industry.
We understand that small crews are
particularly characteristic of raised bore
drilling, which constitutes a small
proportion of shaft and slope
construction projects. We also
understand that this type of shaft and
slope work does not experience the
turnover rate of conventional projects.
Raised bore drilling is mainly from the
surface; therefore, the 24-hour new
miner training applies. This allows,
with District Manager approval, for 8
hours of pre-work training, with the
remaining 16 hours to be done within
60 calendar days following assignment
(known as the 8/16 split). This training
conforms to the preferred approach
advocated by commenters who give
their miners 8 hours of orientation
training and then proceed to train them
incrementally following assignment.
wwhite on PROD1PC65 with RULES4
Applicability of Part 48 Training
Several commenters questioned the
subject-matter applicability of part 48
training to shaft and slope construction
work. They said that part 48 training
was designed for ‘‘miners’’ and is not
relevant or useful to shaft and slope
construction workers. The commenters’
primary concern, however, appears to
be the 40 hour requirement (in existing
§ 48.5) for new underground miners.
We considered the relevance to shaft
and slope construction operations of
each of the courses required in the new
miner training program under existing
§ 48.5. Following is a discussion of the
applicability of the existing § 48.5 new
miner training requirements to shaft and
slope construction workers.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
20:02 Dec 29, 2005
Jkt 208001
1. Miners’ rights—This course
provides all miners with important
information on supervisory
responsibilities, company policies, and
Mine Act rights impacting safety and
health, such as protection in reporting
hazardous conditions.
2. Self-rescue and respiratory
devices—These devices are important
for all miners working in an
underground mine, including drillers
and blasters. The training can be vital
for shaft and slope miners because their
work area is essentially a ‘‘one entry’’
system. In addition, if the shaft and
slope intersects with an existing mine,
there is exposure to that mine’s
atmosphere.
3. Entering and leaving the mine;
transportation; communications—While
we recognize that some shaft and slopes
are not complex, shaft and slope miners
need to be instructed in how to safely
enter, exit, and handle buckets, cages, or
other conveyances, as well as hoists and
cranes. Also important is their
knowledge of the differences between
transportation of personnel and
material, as well as communication
systems, such as how to operate the bell
system and use a pager telephone.
Instruction in the use of a workdeck is
needed, especially when the workdeck
is the secondary means of exit from a
shaft.
4. Introduction to the work
environment—This course is minespecific, focusing on a representative
part of the operation and mining
method used. Mine operators cover this
training during the mine-site training
required by part 48. For shaft and slope
work, it could emphasize the confined
spaces involved and provide some
appreciation of the associated hazards.
The new miner could observe hoisting
activities and became familiarized with
the equipment, particularly pneumatic
equipment used in shaft and slope
work. We recognize that shaft and slope
construction, like other mining, goes
through different phases and that
training for those environments can also
be covered in subsequent annual
refresher training and new task training.
5. Mine map; escapeways; emergency
evacuation; barricading—This course
focuses on emergency procedures,
which all types of operations must have.
The confined spaces and limited means
of access in shaft and slope construction
can make an emergency even more
significant. As with all mining
operations, applicable training adapted
to the particular operation is the
objective.
6. Roof or ground control and
ventilation plans—This course covers
key features regulating ground control
PO 00000
Frm 00005
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
77719
and ventilation. At coal mines, these
features are described in the plan
submitted by the shaft and slope
construction operator as required by 30
CFR part 77, subpart T (Slope and Shaft
Sinking). Roof and ground conditions
are constantly changing in shaft and
slope work, and miners are regularly
exposed to unsupported ribs during the
drill-blast-muck-line shaft cycle. Miners
need to be instructed in examination
methods, so they can recognize failing
or inadequate roof support and maintain
adequate ventilation.
7. Health—This course covers the
purposes of taking exposure
measurements, which is required as part
of the shaft and slope construction plan
for coal mines. Shaft and slope miners
are commonly exposed to dust, noise,
and chemicals. They are exposed to dust
while drilling and mucking, and may be
involved in activities that exceed noise
action levels. The training also includes
the operators’ hazard communication
program, which is vital for shaft and
slope miners who work with and
around oils, diesel fuel, concrete
additives, and other hazardous
chemicals.
8. Cleanup; rock dusting—Cleanup is
essential on a workdeck or elevated
platform to remove tripping hazards and
falls from elevations, and to prevent
loose materials from falling and striking
someone below. Water may make the
workdeck extremely slick, and good
housekeeping minimizes slipping
hazards. The rock dust component of
this training applies to those shaft and
slope projects involving rock dusting.
When shaft and slope development
reaches a coal seam, the rock dusting
program becomes important for miners
who may spend considerable time in a
‘‘coal environment.’’
9. Hazard recognition—This is key
training in any safety and health
program. Shaft and slope construction
hazards, like those of other mining
operations, involve working in confined
spaces, handling materials, and working
in proximity to mobile equipment. The
hazards also include slips and falls,
falling or sloughing materials from roof
and ribs, hoisting and wire rope
hazards, and methane. Other hazards
characteristic of shaft and slope
operations are hazards incident to
height, compressed air, and working
under suspended loads. The course
especially mentions hazards relating to
explosives. This is important training
because blasting is a prominent feature
of many shaft and slope projects.
10. Electrical hazards—While the
only electricity used underground may
be the blasting cable, blasting may be a
prominent feature of the work and may
E:\FR\FM\30DER4.SGM
30DER4
wwhite on PROD1PC65 with RULES4
77720
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 250 / Friday, December 30, 2005 / Rules and Regulations
be conducted around water. A number
of sources of electricity are typically
found on the surface. Surface operations
commonly have an electrical substation.
There are also circuit breakers for the
fan, hoist, compressors, and other
equipment that needs to be energized
and de-energized. Anyone working in or
around the hoist house, in particular,
should be instructed on the electrical
hazards. Commenters mentioned that
they commonly face shock and
electrical hazards in shaft and slope
construction.
11. First aid—This training applies to
all mine environments and persons
working on mine property. In shaft and
slope construction, transporting an
injured person can be problematic
because of the difficulty in getting the
person into a bucket or carrying the
person out of a slope for which the
means of egress is walking. Shaft and
slope crews frequently are small, with
only one person fully qualified to
administer first aid. This increases the
importance of first aid training for the
other miners.
12. Mine gases—Shaft and slope
miners may work in methane and
oxygen deficient atmospheres. Gases
have been, and continue to be, a
problem in some shaft and slope
operations. Shaft and slope companies
recognize this problem and, as
applicable, are required to submit shaft
and slope plans addressing methane and
oxygen deficiency tests. There may be
other workplace exposures, such as
diesel equipment exhaust gases.
13. Health and safety aspects of
tasks—This course is practically
oriented to the specific duties that new
shaft and slope miners will be
performing. As miners are assigned new
tasks, they will also receive new task
training, including health and safety
aspects of those tasks.
14. Other courses required by the
District Manager—When additional
training is required, it should be focused
on the particular training needs of the
operation. Circumstances may justify,
for example, having special emphasis
training on scaling, fall protection,
rigging, compressed air, explosives, or
hoisting.
As described above, part 48 new
miner courses are relevant and flexible
to the needs of shaft and slope miners.
The training serves as a general primer
for introducing new shaft and slope
construction miners to hazards they are
likely to face and the ways those
hazards can be effectively avoided. The
training also provides an overview of
mining methods, conditions, and
circumstances that can be problematic
to persons new to mining. Such training
VerDate Aug<31>2005
20:02 Dec 29, 2005
Jkt 208001
takes time to accomplish and we believe
40 hours is appropriate to prepare a new
miner for the rigors and hazards of a
dangerous underground environment.
We also note that some shaft and
slope projects occur around other
mining operations. Other mine
personnel may assist the shaft and slope
workers. For example, ream cuttings
from raised drill work commonly are
removed by mine personnel. It is
important that the shaft and slope
construction workers be fully trained so
that they do not present a hazard to
themselves or to the other miners.
Part 48 does not force operators to
provide training that does not apply to
their operations. We recognize that
different mining operations have
different training needs and should
emphasize different aspects of the
training. It is left primarily to the mine
operator to provide training that is
meaningful to the miners within the
course framework of part 48. Part 48, in
effect, requires that the subject matter be
relevant to the particular mining
operation. As one industry commenter
observed, part 48 is a ‘‘container that all
sorts of types of training could go into.’’
A commenter questioned whether the
absence of training contributed to
fatalities. Section 115 of the Mine Act
specifically recognized the role training
plays in mine safety. While, in 1978, we
promulgated part 48 training
regulations, in many cases part 48
training did not begin until late in 1979.
In 1979 there were 267 mining related
fatalities. Twenty-four years later, in
2003, the mining industry recorded 56
fatal accidents. Further, at underground
and surface areas of underground mines
there were 18,873 nonfatal days lost
(NFDL) in 1979 and 3,043 in 2003.
As indicated in Table 3, operations
that are required to conduct part 48
training have experienced a lower NFDL
incidence rate. While we do not believe
training was the only reason for the
reduction in accidents, we believe it has
played a significant role.
We acknowledge that shaft and slope
construction operators already provide
some training. However, by requiring
part 48 training for shaft and slope
construction workers, we ensure they
receive the same type of safety and
health training as all other miners.
Requiring part 48 training assures that
shaft and slope construction workers
will receive the training they need on a
timely basis from approved instructors.
Section 101(a)(9) of the Mine Act
provides that no promulgated standard
shall reduce the protection afforded
miners by an existing mandatory health
or safety standard. By promoting
consistent, comprehensive training for
PO 00000
Frm 00006
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
miners previously excluded, the final
rule increases health and safety
protections for miners, and is fully
consonant with Section 101(a)(9).
Compliance Assistance
We will offer compliance assistance to
the shaft and slope construction
operators. Our Educational Field
Service will assist with the assessment
of training needs and in developing
training programs for shaft and slope
construction operations. Additionally,
other resources are available for
developing training such as the
American National Standards Institute
criteria (ANSI Z490.1–2001) as
suggested by one commenter.
B. Section-by-Section Analysis
1. Sections 48.2(a)(1) and 48.22(a)(1)
Definitions Shaft and Slope
Construction Workers as ‘‘Miners’’
Existing §§ 48.2(a)(1) and 48.22(a)(1)
contain the definition of ‘‘miner’’ under
part 48. We proposed to delete the
exclusion contained in subparagraph (i),
for ‘‘shaft and slope workers’’ and, for
underground, ‘‘workers engaged in
construction activities ancillary to shaft
and slope construction.’’ The definition
of ‘‘miner’’ for training purposes would
include any person engaged in shaft or
slope construction. The final rule is
unchanged from the proposed rule.
A commenter said that shaft and slope
construction workers are not ‘‘miners’’
and should not be subject to training
requirements for miners.
Section 3(g) of the Mine Act defines
‘‘miner’’ as any individual working in a
mine. Additionally, Section 3(h)(1) of
the Mine Act defines ‘‘mine’’ to include,
among other things, any shafts, slopes,
facilities, and equipment used in or to
be used in mining. Section 115(d)
discusses rulemaking for mine
construction workers. Congress
recognized that construction work is a
part of mining. The terms of the Mine
Act encompass shaft and slope
construction workers, both surface and
underground, as ‘‘miners.’’ The Mine
Act’s implementing regulations and
standards found in 30 CFR apply to
shaft and slope and other construction
operations. For example, the training
requirements under 30 CFR part 46
cover construction workers exposed to
hazards of mining operations.
Clarification of Terms
A commenter requested that the term
‘‘shaft and slope workers’’ appearing in
the current exclusion be clarified.
Another commenter asked what is
intended by ‘‘ancillary’’ construction
activities. Yet another commenter said
E:\FR\FM\30DER4.SGM
30DER4
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 250 / Friday, December 30, 2005 / Rules and Regulations
that ‘‘shaft and slope construction’’
should be defined, and another inquired
about including preliminary work.
In response, we have taken the terms
from the current training exclusion,
‘‘shaft and slope workers’’ and,
additionally for underground, ‘‘workers
engaged in construction activities
ancillary to shaft and slope sinking,’’
and referred to them as ‘‘any person
* * * engaged in shaft and slope
construction,’’ or ‘‘shaft and slope
construction workers.’’
Shaft and slope workers’’ refers to
miners involved in shaft and slope
construction activities such as: drilling,
blasting, mucking, loading, installing
equipment in the completed shaft or
slope, opening up the excavation,
sinking and lining a hole, grouting the
shaft, and installing panning, shaft steel,
and the fan over the shaft or hoist.
In addition to the construction
activities listed above, ‘‘shaft and slope
construction work’’ encompasses
construction incidental to sinking the
shaft or slope and is commonly
performed by shaft and slope
contractors. On the surface, this
includes construction such as building
a hoist house or installing a permanent
hoist. In the underground context, this
construction was referenced in the
existing rule as ‘‘ancillary’’ construction
activities and includes construction
such as the building of equipment
housing or mine shaft facilities.
Shaft and slope construction activities
pertain to the various types of shaft and
slope operations, including
conventional, raised bore drilling, and
blind drilling, as applicable. The
approach is functional; thus a company
may do any number of activities and be
considered involved in shaft and slope
construction work. A shaft and slope
construction company may contract
with other companies to do some of
these activities, in which case all of the
companies would be performing shaft
and slope construction work. Shaft and
slope construction work does not
include preliminary work, such as road
building, timbering, and site clearance,
typically not performed by shaft and
slope construction operations.
wwhite on PROD1PC65 with RULES4
Coverage of All Construction Workers
and Subpart C
Commenters said that special training
requirements should be developed and
applied to all mine construction
workers, not just shaft and slope
construction workers, and contained in
a new subpart C to part 48. Some
commenters stated that the Mine Act
requires separate training standards for
construction workers.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
20:02 Dec 29, 2005
Jkt 208001
In addressing these comments we
point to Section 115(d) of the Mine Act,
which authorizes us to issue
‘‘appropriate’’ construction training
standards. There is no statutory
requirement for training standards that
apply exclusively to mine construction
workers. As we previously stated, the
part 46 miner training requirements
apply to construction workers at
covered operations. Likewise, as
explained in this preamble, experience
has shown that shaft and slope
construction workers perform work and
face hazards similar to other miners and
should receive similar training.
Moreover, most shaft and slope
construction workers perform work
underground, and the Mine Act
acknowledges that such construction
workers may not be practicably
differentiated from other underground
miners. Indeed, the legislative history of
the Mine Act evidences a congressional
belief that underground construction
workers generally face the same hazards
as do other underground miners.
A commenter said that the part 48
training exclusion should be eliminated
for all mine construction workers, not
just those engaged in shaft or slope
construction.
We have analyzed the accident and
injury data for shaft and slope
construction workers and we believe it
supports the need to eliminate the
training exclusion for them. However,
we are not prepared at this time to
expand the rulemaking to cover other
construction workers. Any rulemaking
for other mine construction workers is
reserved for future consideration
consistent with Section 115(d) of the
Mine Act.
Comprehensive Training or Hazard
Training
We proposed to apply the
comprehensive training requirements of
part 48 to all shaft and slope
construction workers. Consequently,
they would receive new miner,
experienced miner, task, and annual
refresher training, as applicable. One
commenter suggested that only hazard
training would be appropriate for
persons working on-site for five days or
less. Like extraction and production
miners, shaft and slope construction
workers face hazards that are
significant. The final rule accordingly
requires all shaft and slope construction
workers to complete comprehensive
training without regard to the amount of
time spent on-site. However, we
recognize that shaft and slope
construction companies may contract
out some maintenance and service jobs.
In keeping with existing requirements,
PO 00000
Frm 00007
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
77721
such maintenance or service
contractors, who are not at the mine for
frequent periods or extended periods of
more than five days, would receive
hazard training, and not be required to
receive comprehensive training.
Further, the final rule, like the
proposed rule, applies the short-term
specialized contractor provision in
§§ 48.2(a)(1) and 48.22(a)(1) to shaft and
slope construction workers who move
from site-to-site. Such miners who have
received experienced miner training
could receive hazard training at each
new site. There was no comment on this
provision and the final rule remains
unchanged.
Applicability of Part 48 Subpart A
Training (Underground) and Subpart B
Training (Surface)
Many shaft and slope construction
workers work underground. Subpart A
training would apply to them.
Commenters pointed out that there are
some types of shaft and slope
construction operations, such as blind
drilling operations, where the miners
are only on the surface. In those cases,
subpart B training would apply.
Most shaft and slope construction
workers perform both surface and
underground work. There are shaft and
slope miners who, for example,
mobilize a project by building surface
facilities in preparation of shaft sinking,
and then proceed to work underground.
Commenters asked whether both
subpart A training and subpart B
training would apply, and if new miners
falling under both sections would have
to take a possible total of 64 hours of
training before being assigned work
duties. Additionally, a commenter asked
whether those individuals who
completed the training would be
considered both experienced
underground and surface miners.
A new miner training program of 40
hours would suffice for these miners,
but only to the extent that the miners
are specifically hired to work both on
the surface and underground. This
training would not apply, for example,
to surface miners who are only subject
to subpart B training, and are later
reassigned to work underground (these
miners would then have to take training
for new underground miners).
The focus of the training is flexible
and should reflect the needs of the
miners. As underground activities are
emphasized, we anticipate that the
training will focus on the underground
duties, with some surface training. For
example, initial practical orientation at
the beginning of a project could contain
instruction germane to an underground
environment, such as fall protection,
E:\FR\FM\30DER4.SGM
30DER4
77722
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 250 / Friday, December 30, 2005 / Rules and Regulations
wwhite on PROD1PC65 with RULES4
rigging, and familiarization of
equipment, tools, and safety procedures,
such as bell signals. These miners will
be considered underground miners for
training purposes. After they complete
the training, they can work at surface
areas of a shaft or slope construction site
or underground. Once these miners
have worked 12 months at a shaft or
slope construction site or in an
underground mine, they will be
considered experienced underground
miners for life.
2. Sections 48.2(b)(4) and 48.22(b)(4)
‘‘Experienced Miner’’ Qualifications and
Grandfather Provision
Existing §§ 48.2(b) and 48.22(b) define
‘‘experienced miner’’ as: (1) A miner
who has completed MSHA-approved
new miner training or training
acceptable to MSHA from a State
agency, and who has had at least 12
months of mining experience; (2) a
supervisor who is certified under an
MSHA-approved State certification
program and who is employed as a
supervisor on October 6, 1998; or (3) an
experienced miner on February 9, 1999.
We proposed to amend 48.2(b) and
48.22(b) to add a new paragraph (b)(4)
specifying that miners employed as
shaft and slope construction workers on
the effective date of the final rule are
‘‘experienced miners.’’
Commenters said that the proposed
rule was too limited and did not
recognize the transient nature of shaft
and slope construction work. They
suggested an additional grandfather
provision for miners who have six
months experience within the 24 month
period before the effective date of the
rule. We agree. The final rule specifies
that shaft and slope construction
workers, either who are employed on
the effective date of this rule, or who
have six months of shaft or slope
construction experience within the 24
month period before the effective date,
are ‘‘experienced miners.’’ The final rule
makes clear that an ‘‘experienced
miner’’ status for surface or
underground purposes is accorded to
current surface workers or underground
workers, respectively. This grandfather
provision is intended to recognize
previous experience of those miners
who are already employed in shaft and
slope construction.
One commenter suggested the
grandfather provision be expanded to
include all shaft and slope construction
workers regardless of when they were
employed. The commenter also
recommended that Occupational Safety
and Health Administration (OSHA)
training in the previous 12 months and
12 months cumulative experience
VerDate Aug<31>2005
20:02 Dec 29, 2005
Jkt 208001
should qualify shaft and slope
construction workers as ‘‘experienced.’’
We do not believe that such
expansion of the grandfather and
‘‘experienced miner’’ provisions for
shaft and slope construction is justified.
The grandfather provision should be
limited to those miners who currently
are or recently have been a part of shaft
and slope construction. We are mindful,
however, that shaft and slope
construction is no less dangerous than
extraction and production and other
mine contract work. The experienced
miner requirements for shaft and slope
construction workers generally should
be like those of other miners. Moreover,
the training they receive needs to be
appropriate for mining.
Some commenters were concerned
that the status of being an ‘‘experienced
miner’’ may not be permanent for shaft
and slope construction workers.
Consistent with the current rule, the
final rule provides that once a miner is
an ‘‘experienced miner,’’ that miner is
always an ‘‘experienced miner’’ for
training purposes.
The final rule retains the approach of
the current rule under which there are
two basic ways of becoming an
‘‘experienced miner’’: Through the
grandfather provision, or through a
combination of training and experience.
Once a shaft and slope construction
worker is an ‘‘experienced miner’’ for
underground or surface purposes, that
status carries over to other underground
or surface mining operations,
respectively. Similarly, an experienced
miner coming from another type of
mining operation is considered an
experienced miner for shaft and slope
construction.
3. Sections 48.3 and 48.23
Plans
Training
a. Shaft and Slope Training Plans
Sections 48.3 and 48.23 require each
mine operator to have an MSHAapproved plan containing programs for
new miner training, experienced miner
training, new task training, annual
refresher training, and hazard training.
The standards contain the specific
requirements for filing, approval and
disapproval of training plans, and
commencement of training.
We proposed a new paragraph (o) that
would require shaft and slope
construction operators to have an
approved training plan. This was
implementing language, allowing a
reasonable amount of time for operators
to obtain an approved plan. The final
rule retains this provision.
Several commenters expressed
concern that this would mean they
PO 00000
Frm 00008
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
would be required to have a new plan
developed and approved for each new
project. Like other independent
contractors that are mobile and work at
different sites, the shaft and slope
construction operators can have one
training plan for all of their project sites.
Some shaft and slope construction
operators work in different MSHA
districts, and commenters were
concerned about varying interpretations
affecting approval from the districts. A
plan approved in one MSHA district is
considered approved in all other MSHA
districts.
Commenters also said that shaft and
slope construction operators should
have the option to have their own plan
or use the plan of other mine operators.
Consistent with the existing rule and
practice for other mine operators, shaft
and slope construction operators may
opt to have their own plan or use the
plan of another operator or programs of
a cooperative, provided that the plan
adequately addresses hazards
characteristic of the shaft and slope
construction work (existing §§ 48.4 and
48.24).
b. Training Plan Development,
Submission, and Approval
We proposed in the new paragraph (o)
to allow current shaft and slope
construction operators 120 days from
the date the final rule is published,
unless extended by us, to submit a
training plan. There were no adverse
comments on the proposed provision,
and the final rule remains unchanged.
The shaft and slope construction
operators are subject as well to existing
plan development requirements of
notice and posting under §§ 48.3(d)/
48.23(d).
Some commenters were concerned
about the applicability of the training
plan requirements to the schedule of
shaft and slope construction projects.
One commenter indicated the
requirements of plan development, such
as the two week notice to miners’
representatives, would be impractical.
Another commenter supported the 120
day timeframe but said that we should
waive this provision on a case-by-case
basis to accommodate new shaft and
slope construction projects started on
short notice.
We believe the requirements are
reasonable. They have been applied
successfully to other independent mine
contractors who acquire work on short
notice. Miner input into training will be
no less valuable in shaft and slope
construction than in other mining
operations. Shaft and slope construction
contractors can use one plan to basically
cover all projects and do not need to
E:\FR\FM\30DER4.SGM
30DER4
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 250 / Friday, December 30, 2005 / Rules and Regulations
wwhite on PROD1PC65 with RULES4
constantly create new plans as they
move from mine to mine.
Under the proposed rule, new
operators must have a training plan
prior to commencing operations. This is
consistent with the requirement for
other mining operations. We did not
receive any comments on this provision.
We have added the date of 180 days
after the rule’s publication to clarify
what is meant by a ‘‘new’’ operator.
Otherwise, the provision remains
unchanged in the final rule.
For a new shaft and slope
construction operation that begins work
after the publication date and before
[insert date 180 days after the date of
publication] we will allow the same
number of days as existing operators to
submit a plan (120 days), commencing
from the work starting date.
c. Training Programs and Hours
Under the proposed rule, the required
training plan would contain programs
for training new miners, training
experienced miners, task training,
annual refresher training, and hazard
training. The final rule retained these
requirements.
The new miner training requirements
drew numerous comments. They said
that the requirements of 40 hours for
underground and 24 hours for surface
are excessive and unduly focus on
classroom instruction.
Those hour requirements are in the
current rule covering other mining
operations and are taken from section
115(a) of the Mine Act. Congress felt
they were appropriate for new miners
entering into a hazardous environment.
New shaft and slope construction
miners, like other miners, work in a
dangerous environment and are exposed
to potentially lethal hazards. These
miners must receive the amount of
training necessary for them to
adequately cope with the hazards of
their job.
While many mine operators take
advantage of classroom instruction,
there is no requirement for classroom
training. The regulations provide that
the training must duplicate the actual
mining conditions to the extent
practicable and approximately 8 hours
of training is to be conducted at the
mine.
Commenters stated that the part 48
new miner training places too much
emphasis on training before assignment
to duties. They said that training is more
effectively done in intervals while onthe-job. One commenter remarked about
the short attention span of workers.
Commenters said they have, for
example, 4 to 8 hours of orientation
training, task training over a number of
VerDate Aug<31>2005
20:02 Dec 29, 2005
Jkt 208001
shifts with recorded supervisor
observations, and safety training at
periodic meetings.
Constructing a shaft or slope can
present a work environment where
hazards may not be easily identified
without advance training. Shaft and
slope construction workers, like other
miners, are not necessarily presented
hazards one at a time, but may be
exposed to several hazards at once
(unstable ground, tripping, gases, and
mobile equipment, for example). New
shaft and slope construction workers,
like other new miners, should not be
subject to work hazards before they are
fully trained. The Mine Act
contemplates that a significant amount
of training, particularly new miner
training, be done in sessions set aside
for training rather than simply ‘‘on-thejob’’ with attendant exposure to job
hazards.
Part 48 training also includes training
after assignment to work duties as well
as training in intervals. The training for
surface miners permits the 24 hours of
new miner training to be split. Eight
hours can be given to the miner at the
mine site immediately before being
assigned work duties, and then 16 hours
of training thereafter. In both
underground and surface training,
miners can take periods of annual
refresher training (§§ 48.3(c)(7) and
48.23(c)(7) and §§ 48.8(e) and 48.28(e)).
Additionally, they receive new task
training, as applicable, which may
include supervised equipment operation
on-the-job. If operators want to provide
additional training, they are free to do
so. The flexible framework of part 48
allows operators to provide beneficial
training beyond what is required.
d. Crediting Prior Training and
Experience
One commenter, citing our approach
for training under part 46, said that
previous training and experience should
be taken into account and applied
toward meeting the requirements for
new miner training and annual refresher
training. The commenter indicated that
new shaft and slope construction
workers may already have had some
task experience and training,
particularly OSHA training, which
would remain relevant to their mining
jobs. Another commenter claimed that
tunneling is relevant experience for
mining. And another commenter said
that past training from other contractors
should be credited.
While we want to avoid undue
duplication of training, we are mindful
that a mining environment may present
unique circumstances and hazards.
Those aspects of mining are usually best
PO 00000
Frm 00009
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
77723
addressed in training designed
specifically for mining. Having
instructors approved to teach mining
courses provides a qualitative factor not
available in other training.
On the other hand, there are subjects,
such as first aid, that are more generic
in nature and essentially apply in any
type of work environment. We are aware
that shaft and slope construction
workers previously may have received
some occupational training that is
relevant to mining.
Balancing these considerations, we
may grant partial credit in certain
instances. Generic training courses such
as first aid will be credited (this
includes qualifications obtained more
than a year before, but which are still
current). Other training, particularly
from OSHA and state OSH sources, may
be considered for credit upon
application.
We recognize that some jobs are
similar whether in a mining or nonmining environment. We already allow
operators to credit pertinent prior
experience for some miners in order to
meet the experience requirements under
existing §§ 48.5 and 48.25.
Likewise, we will allow shaft and
slope construction operators to credit
relevant job experience. Operators
should evaluate the experience as to the
similarity of work environment, the
hazards encountered, and the work
skills and practices used.
e. Approved Instructors
Consistent with existing part 48,
much of the training required by the
final rule must be conducted by MSHAapproved instructors (§§ 48.3(i) and
48.23(i)). A commenter said that it will
be extremely impractical for
construction companies to get their own
personnel ‘‘MSHA approved’’ as
instructors in a timely manner, when
they may only perform one or two jobs
at a mine in the entire business lifecycle. The commenter said that the rule
should allow ‘‘competent persons’’ and
OSHA instructors to conduct the
training. This would allow for
comparable expertise and take into
account the realities of shaft and slope
construction work, which often
demands the availability of varying
crews at remote locations.
It has been our experience under part
48, however, that mine operators,
including small operators and those
working in remote areas, generally have
been able to obtain approved instructors
when needed. Approved instructors
have been readily available through
three sources: Operators’ staffs, state
grantees, and private vendors. Even
small mine operators have become
E:\FR\FM\30DER4.SGM
30DER4
77724
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 250 / Friday, December 30, 2005 / Rules and Regulations
approved instructors themselves,
available to train employees as
necessary. Some commenters indicated
they have staff training resources.
We have approved thousands of
instructors. There are various ways
described in §§ 48.3(l) and 48.23(l) of
becoming an approved instructor. Many
instructors are approved based on
expertise, and that can include shaft and
slope construction. If the demand is
there, we anticipate even more
individuals will seek certification as
instructors.
4. Sections 48.8 and 48.28 Annual
Refresher Training
We proposed to amend existing
paragraph (d) to require all shaft and
slope construction workers employed
on the effective date of the final rule to
receive annual refresher training no
later than 12 months from the effective
month of the rule. There were no
comments on the proposed provision,
and therefore, it remains unchanged in
the final rule.
This will establish an annual refresher
training cycle for shaft and slope
construction workers. To maintain this
training cycle, shaft and slope
construction operators may complete
the annual refresher training during the
last calendar month of the miners’
annual refresher training cycle.
wwhite on PROD1PC65 with RULES4
5. Effective Date
Under the proposed rule, the rule
would be effective 180 days after
publication except for §§ 48.3(o) and
48.23(o). Those sections, requiring
submission of a training plan, would be
effective on the date of publication. We
did not receive any comments on the
proposed effective date, and it remains
unchanged in the final rule.
III. Executive Order 12866
Executive Order (E.O.) 12866 as
amended by E.O. 13258 requires that
regulatory agencies assess both the costs
and benefits of intended regulations. We
have fulfilled this requirement for the
final rule, and have determined that the
final rule will not have an annual effect
of $100 million or more on the
economy. Therefore, it is not an
economically significant regulatory
action pursuant to section 3(f)(1) of E.O.
12866.
The rule will provide shaft and slope
construction workers with the same
type of safety and health training
afforded other miners. Shaft and slope
construction workers will now receive
training for new miners, training for
experienced miners, task training,
annual refresher training, and hazard
training, as applicable. The affected
VerDate Aug<31>2005
20:02 Dec 29, 2005
Jkt 208001
mining sectors and costs and benefits of
the final rule are discussed below. A full
discussion of the economic impacts of
the final rule is provided in the
Regulatory Economic Analysis which is
provided on our webpage at
www.msha.gov, under Rules and
Regulations.
Mining Sectors Affected
This final rule extends part 48
training to coal and metal and nonmetal
shaft and slope construction workers
who work in underground mines or at
surface areas of underground mines.
Based on the second quarter of 2003
data, the final rule will cover about 690
full-time equivalent shaft and slope
construction workers. Of this total,
about 570 (or 83%) are employed by
coal contractor firms, while the
remaining 120 (or 17%) are employed
by metal and nonmetal contractor firms.
All of these contractor firms are large by
our standards, employing 20 to 500
people. The final rule covers more shaft
and slope construction workers than the
number reported above because the
number discussed above only represents
the number of full-time equivalent
employees. For instance, if a contractor
hires 4 new shaft and slope miners, and
three quit, the contractor firm would
have paid the cost to train all 4 new
hires, although only one remains
employed. The one remaining miner is
reported in the number of shaft and
slope construction workers.
Hence, the final rule covers both
currently employed shaft and slope
construction workers and all the newly
hired shaft and slope construction
workers.
Benefits
Safety and health professionals from
all sectors of the shaft and slope
construction industry recognize that
training is a critical element of an
effective safety and health program.
Training informs miners of safety and
health hazards inherent in the
workplace and enables them to identify
and avoid such hazards. Training
further teaches miners health and safety
principles and safe operating
procedures in performing their work
tasks. Training becomes more important
with the influx of new and less
experienced miners and mine operators;
longer work hours to meet demands;
and increased demand for contractors
who may be less familiar with the
dangers on mine property.
There were 15 shaft and slope
construction worker fatalities and an
estimated 1,819 NFDL injuries from
PO 00000
Frm 00010
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
1982 to 2005.1 This is equivalent to 0.69
fatalities and 86.64 NFDL injuries
annually for shaft and slope
construction workers. We further
analyzed the incidence rates of six shaft
and slope construction contractors, five
of which represent the majority of the
industry. We used the number of the
industry’s fatalities as the basis for
determining the industry-wide accident
and injury rates.
In support of our 1999 part 46 final
rule, we estimated the effect of metal
and nonmetal miner training using data
on injury and fatality rates for mines
that conducted training versus those
that did not. On average, mines that
conducted training had fatality rates
that were 60 percent lower and days-lost
injury rates that were 26 percent lower,
relative to mines that did not conduct
training. We noted that the mines with
training tended to be larger and safer
(independent of training) and assumed
that only half of the observed lower
injury and fatality rates was due to
training itself. Therefore, for part 46, we
estimated that miner training will
reduce fatality rates by 30 percent and
injury rates by 13 percent.
Applying these same rates to shaft
and slope construction worker training,
we estimate that the final rule will
prevent approximately 0.2 fatalities and
11 NFDL injuries annually.
Compliance Costs
All cost estimates are presented in
2003 dollars. The total yearly costs of
the final rule are estimated to be about
$555,000 for all coal contractor firms
and $118,000 for all metal and nonmetal
contractor firms. In addition, as a result
of this rule, coal contractor miners are
estimated to incur yearly costs of about
$96,000, and metal and nonmetal
contractor miners to incur yearly costs
of about $20,000 for training prior to
employment.
IV. Feasibility
We have concluded that the
requirements of the final rule are both
technologically and economically
feasible. This final rule is not a
technology-forcing standard and does
not involve activities on the frontiers of
scientific knowledge. In addition, it
1 MSHA does not have a separate system
identifier for shaft and slope contractors in its
accident database. However, because MSHA
conducts an accident investigation of each mine
fatality, we are able to tabulate the total number of
shaft and slope fatalities from 1982–2005. To
estimate the number of NFDL injuries for all shaft
and slope contractors from 1982–2003, we used the
ratio of NFDL injuries to fatalities for the six known
shaft and slope construction companies and
multiplied them by the total number of shaft and
slope fatalities from 1982 through August 2003.
E:\FR\FM\30DER4.SGM
30DER4
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 250 / Friday, December 30, 2005 / Rules and Regulations
does not require the purchase of any
machinery or equipment to implement
these training plans as prescribed in
part 48. Therefore, we have concluded
that this final rule is technologically
feasible.
The total costs of the final rule are
about $555,000 annually for all coal
contractor firms and $118,000 annually
for all metal and nonmetal contractor
firms. We had to combine these coal and
metal and nonmetal contractor firms
together to estimate the yearly revenues
because these contractor firms are not
generally limited to one industry, and
they could do shaft and slope
construction work at both coal and
metal and nonmetal mines. These
compliance costs are well under 1
percent (about 0.19 percent) of the
yearly estimated revenues of $357
million for these contractor firms. We
believe this is convincing evidence that
the final rule is economically feasible.
wwhite on PROD1PC65 with RULES4
V. Regulatory Flexibility Act
Certification
Pursuant to the Regulatory Flexibility
Act of 1980 as amended, we analyzed
the impact of the final part 48 rule on
small businesses. Further, we made a
determination with respect to whether
or not we can certify that the final rule
does not have a significant economic
impact on a substantial number of small
entities that are covered by this
rulemaking. Under the Small Business
Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act
(SBREFA) amendments to the
Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA), we
must include in the rule a factual basis
for this certification. If the final rule
were to impose a significant economic
impact on a substantial number of small
entities, then we must develop an initial
regulatory flexibility analysis.
Definition of a Small Mine
Under the RFA, in analyzing the
impact of a final rule on small entities,
we must use the SBA definition for a
small entity, or after consultation with
the SBA Office of Advocacy, establish
an alternative definition for the mining
industry by publishing that definition in
the Federal Register for notice and
comment. We have not taken such an
action, and hence are required to use the
SBA definition.
The SBA defines a small entity in the
mining industry as an establishment
with 500 or fewer employees (13 CFR
121.201). All of the underground coal
and metal and nonmetal contractor
firms affected by this rulemaking fall
into this category, and so can be viewed
as sharing the special regulatory
concerns which the RFA was designed
to address.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
20:02 Dec 29, 2005
Jkt 208001
Traditionally, we have also looked at
the impacts of our final rules on a subset
of mines with 500 or fewer employees—
those with fewer than 20 employees,
which the mining community refers to
as ‘‘small mines.’’ These small mines
differ from larger mines not only in the
number of employees, but also, among
other things, in economies of scale, in
material produced, in the type and
amount of production equipment, and
in supply inventory. Therefore, their
costs of complying with the final rule
and its impact on them will also tend to
be different. It is for this reason that
‘‘small mines,’’ as traditionally defined
by the mining community, are of special
concern to us.
This analysis complies with the legal
requirements of the RFA for an analysis
of the economic impacts on ‘‘small
entities’’ while continuing our
traditional look at ‘‘small mines.’’ We
conclude that we can certify that the
final part 48 rule does not have a
significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities that
are covered by this rulemaking.
Factual Basis for Certification
Our analysis of economic impacts on
‘‘small entities’’ begins with a
‘‘screening’’ analysis. The screening
compares the estimated compliance
costs of a final rule for small entities in
the sector covered by the rule to the
estimated revenues for those small
entities. When estimated compliance
costs are less than 1 percent of the
estimated revenues (for the size
categories considered), we believe it is
generally appropriate to conclude that
there is no significant economic impact
on a substantial number of small
entities. When estimated compliance
costs exceed 1 percent of revenues, it
tends to indicate that further analysis
may be warranted.
Derivation of Costs and Revenues
Both coal and metal and nonmetal
contractor firms would incur costs to
comply with this final rule. We
examined the relationship between
costs and revenues for the coal and
metal and nonmetal contractor sectors
as two independent entities, rather than
combining them into one category.
However, we had to combine these two
entities to perform impact analysis in
this section for the following reasons.
Most of the 23 coal and metal and
nonmetal contractor firms affected by
this final rule are privately owned and
do not make their financial data
available to the public. The only two
contractor firms for which we were able
to obtain financial data were listed as
PO 00000
Frm 00011
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
77725
coal contractor firms.2 However, these
contractor firms are not generally
limited to one industry, and they could
perform shaft and slope construction
work at both coal and metal and
nonmetal mines.
We used available financial data for
the two publicly-traded, middle-sized
contractor firms 3 together with Industry
Norms & Key Business Ratios 4 and
extrapolated the revenues to estimate
revenues for the entire shaft and slope
contractor industry. The financial data
for each of the two contractor firms was
a range of assets (i.e., $1 million to $5
million; $25 million to $50 million). To
be conservative, we chose to use the
lower bound for the reported assets to
calculate the average assets for a
contractor firm. The next step was to
use the assets to sales ratio for the
mining industry from Industry Norms &
Key Business Ratios 5 to obtain an
estimate of average revenues for each
contractor firm. Then, we multiplied
that revenue number by the 23
contractor firms (from Table IV–2).
Results of Screening Analysis
Our analysis of economic impacts on
‘‘small entities’’ begins with a
‘‘screening’’ analysis. The screening
compares the estimated compliance
costs of a final rule for small entities in
the sector covered by the rule to the
estimated revenues for those small
entities. When estimated compliance
costs are less than 1 percent of the
estimated revenues (for the size
categories considered), we believe it is
generally appropriate to conclude that
there is no significant economic impact
on a substantial number of small
entities. When estimated compliance
costs exceed 1 percent of revenues, it
tends to indicate that further analysis
may be warranted.
The combined estimated yearly cost
of the final rule for both coal and metal
and nonmetal contractor firms is about
$673,000 as compared to estimated
annual revenues of about $357 million
2 The source of the financial data for these two
contractor firms was the Thomas Registry, located
online at www.thomasregistry.com. Thomas
Register is an online resource for finding companies
and products manufactured in North America.
3 Since there were no costs to either small coal
or metal and nonmetal contractor firms that employ
between one to 19 contractor employees, we did not
perform separate impact analysis for that mine size
category. To satisfy the requirements of SBREFA,
we only have to consider a subset of the SBA’s
definition of ‘‘small entities’’—contractor firms that
employ 20–500 employees.
4 Industry Norms & Key Business Ratios, pp. 8–
10.
5 The assets to sales ratio is calculated by taking
the average assets to sales ratio (of 128.9%) for coal,
metal and non-metallic mineral operations,
excluding fuel.
E:\FR\FM\30DER4.SGM
30DER4
77726
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 250 / Friday, December 30, 2005 / Rules and Regulations
for the affected firms.6 Costs as
percentage of revenues are well below
one percent (0.19 percent for coal and
metal and nonmetal contractor firms)
and, therefore, we conclude that the rule
will not have a significant economic
impact on a substantial number of small
entities.
VI. Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995
The part 48 rule has four provisions:
§§ 48.3 and 48.23; and §§ 48.9 and 48.29
that impose a paperwork burden
requirement. This final rule does not
require a new type of training plan. It
requires shaft and slope contractor firms
to comply with the paperwork burden
requirements as specified in §§ 48.3 and
48.23, and §§ 48.9 and 48.29. The
reporting of this paperwork burden
requirement is approved under OMB
control number 1219–0009. Total first
year burden hours consist of two
components: first year burden hours and
annual burden hours in year one. Total
first year costs are equal to the total
annualized costs in the first year plus
total annual costs in year one.
Contractor firms working in coal mines
would incur about 296 paperwork
burden hours in the first year with
associated burden hours costs of $4,091;
contractor firms working in metal and
nonmetal mines would incur about 72
paperwork burden hours in the first year
with associated burden hours costs of
$1,081. Of the 296 paperwork burden
hours in the first year for contractor
firms working in coal mines, only 132
hours were first-year only burden hours,
with associated costs of $5,229 (which
is equivalent to $366 of annualized
costs) of the 72 paperwork burden hours
in the first year for contractor firms
working in metal and nonmetal mines,
only 28 hours were first-year only
burden hours, with associated costs of
$1,101, which is equivalent to $77 of
wwhite on PROD1PC65 with RULES4
6 One
concern about the robustness of the
screening analysis is that it is based on (available)
financial data for only 2 of the 23 contractor firms.
If the assets and revenues for these two contractor
firms were non-representative of the other
contractors and in particular significantly overestimated average contractor firm assets and
revenues, then it is possible that actual revenues for
all the contractor firms would be insufficient to
pass the screening analysis. To address this
concern, we obtained employment data, from web
pages and MSHA testimony, for several of the
corporations controlling the contractor firms. For
the two contractor firms for which we have
financial data, employment was 50–99 employees
and 100–249 employees. For two other contractor
firms, total employment was 50–150 employees and
up to 300 employees. We found that another
contractor firm was owned by Germany’s largest
mining contractor, with over $2 billion in
completed projects in the Americas in recent
decades. Just for these five firms, extrapolating the
employment and project information to estimate
revenue, we were able to estimate sufficient
revenues to pass the screening analysis.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
20:02 Dec 29, 2005
Jkt 208001
annualized costs (from Table VII–1 in
the REA). Contractor firms working in
coal mines would incur about 183
annual burden hours starting in year
two with associated costs of $4,425;
contractor firms working in metal and
nonmetal mines would incur about 49
annual burden hours starting in year
two with associated costs of $1,164.
VII. Other Regulatory Considerations
A. The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
This final rule does not include any
Federal mandate that may result in
increased expenditures by State, local,
or tribal governments; nor does it
increase private sector expenditures by
more than $100 million annually; nor
does it significantly or uniquely affect
small governments. Accordingly, the
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995
(2 U.S.C. 1501 et seq.) requires no
further agency action or analysis.
B. National Environmental Policy Act
We have reviewed this final rule in
accordance with the requirements of the
National Environmental Policy Act
(NEPA) of 1969 (42 U.S.C. 4321 et seq.),
the regulations of the Council on
Environmental Quality (40 U.S.C. part
1500), and the Department of Labor’s
NEPA procedures (29 CFR part 11). This
final rule is categorically excluded from
NEPA requirements because it involves
educational activities which have no
possibility of significant environmental
impact (29 CFR 11.10(a)(1)(vi)).
Accordingly, we have not conducted an
environmental assessment nor provided
an environmental impact statement.
C. The Treasury and General
Government Appropriations Act of
1999: Assessment of Federal
Regulations and Policies on Families
This final rule has no affect on family
well-being or stability, marital
commitment, parental rights or
authority, or income or poverty of
families and children. Accordingly,
section 654 of the Treasury and General
Government Appropriations Act of 1999
(5 U.S.C. 601 note) requires no further
agency action, analysis, or assessment.
D. Executive Order 12630: Government
Actions and Interference With
Constitutionally Protected Property
Rights
This final rule does not implement a
policy with takings implications.
Accordingly, Executive Order 12630,
Governmental Actions and Interference
with Constitutionally Protected Property
Rights, requires no further agency action
or analysis.
PO 00000
Frm 00012
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
E. Executive Order 12988: Civil Justice
Reform
This final rule was written to provide
a clear legal standard for affected
conduct and was carefully reviewed to
eliminate drafting errors and
ambiguities, so as to minimize litigation
and undue burden on the Federal court
system. Accordingly, this final rule
meets the applicable standards provided
in section 3 of Executive Order 12988,
Civil Justice Reform.
F. Executive Order 13045: Protection of
Children From Environmental Health
Risks and Safety Risks
This final rule has no adverse impact
on children. Accordingly, Executive
Order 13045, Protection of Children
from Environmental Health Risks and
Safety Risks, as amended by Executive
Orders 13229 and 13296, requires no
further agency action or analysis.
G. Executive Order 13132: Federalism
This final rule does not have
‘‘federalism implications,’’ because it
does not ‘‘have substantial direct effects
on the States, on the relationship
between the national government and
the States, or on the distribution of
power and responsibilities among the
various levels of government.’’
Accordingly, Executive Order 13132,
Federalism, requires no further agency
action or analysis.
H. Executive Order 13175: Consultation
and Coordination With Indian Tribal
Governments
This final rule does not have ‘‘tribal
implications,’’ because it does not ‘‘have
substantial direct effects on one or more
Indian tribes, on the relationship
between the Federal government and
Indian tribes, or on the distribution of
power and responsibilities between the
Federal government and Indian tribes.’’
Accordingly, Executive Order 13175,
Consultation and Coordination with
Indian Tribal Governments, requires no
further agency action or analysis.
I. Executive Order 13211: Actions
Concerning Regulations That
Significantly Affect Energy, Supply,
Distribution, or Use
This final rule is not a ‘‘significant
energy action,’’ because it is not ‘‘likely
to have a significant adverse effect on
the supply, distribution, or use of
energy’’ ‘‘(including a shortfall in
supply, price increases, and increased
use of foreign supplies).’’ Accordingly,
Executive Order 13211, Actions
Concerning Regulations That
Significantly Affect Energy Supply,
Distribution, or Use, requires no further
agency action or analysis.
E:\FR\FM\30DER4.SGM
30DER4
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 250 / Friday, December 30, 2005 / Rules and Regulations
Mine safety and health, Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements, Training
programs and mining.
§ 48.6 (Experienced miner training) of
this subpart A may, in lieu of
subsequent training under that section
for each new employment, receive
training under § 48.11 (Hazard training)
of this subpart A. This definition does
not include:
(i) Workers under subpart C of this
part 48, engaged in the construction of
major additions to an existing mine
which requires the mine to cease
operations;
*
*
*
*
*
(b) * * *
*
*
*
*
*
(4)(i) A person employed as an
underground shaft or slope construction
worker on June 28, 2006; or
(ii) A person who has six months of
underground shaft or slope experience
within 24 months before June 28, 2006.
*
*
*
*
*
I 3. Section 48.3 is amended by revising
paragraph (a) introductory text and
adding paragraph (o) as follows:
Dated: December 23, 2005.
David G. Dye,
Acting Assistant Secretary for Mine Safety
and Health.
§ 48.3 Training plans; time of
submissions; where filed; information
required; time for approval; method for
disapproval; commencement of training;
approval instructors.
For reasons set out in the preamble,
Chapter I of Title 30 of the Code of
Federal Regulations is amended as
follows:
(a) Except as provided in paragraph
(o) of this section, each operator of an
underground mine shall have an MSHAapproved plan containing programs for
training new miners, training
experienced miners, training miners for
new tasks, annual refresher training,
and hazard training for miners as
follows:
*
*
*
*
*
(o) Each operator engaged in shaft or
slope construction shall have an MSHAapproved training plan, as outlined in
this section, containing programs for
training new miners, training
experienced miners, training miners for
new tasks, annual refresher training,
and hazard training for miners as
follows:
(1) In the case of an operator engaged
in shaft or slope construction on
December 30, 2005, the operator shall
submit a plan for approval by May 1,
2006, unless extended by MSHA.
(2) In the case of a new shaft or slope
construction operator after June 28,
2006, the operator shall have an
approved plan prior to commencing
shaft or slope construction.
I 4. Paragraph (d) of § 48.8 is revised to
read as follows:
J. Executive Order 13272: Proper
Consideration of Small Entities in
Agency Rulemaking
We have thoroughly reviewed this
final rule to assess and take appropriate
account of its potential impact on small
businesses, small governmental
jurisdictions, and small organizations.
We have determined and certified that
this final rule will not have a significant
economic impact on a substantial
number of small entities. We took
appropriate account of comments
received relevant to the rule’s potential
impact on small entities. Accordingly,
Executive Order 13272, Proper
Consideration of Small Entities in
Agency Rulemaking, requires no further
action or analysis by us.
VIII. Regulatory Text
List of Subjects in 30 CFR Part 48
I
PART 48—[AMENDED]
1. The authority citation for part 48
continues to read as follows:
I
Authority: 30 U.S.C. 811, 825.
2. Section 48.2 is amended by revising
paragraphs (a)(1) introductory text and
(a)(1)(i) and by adding paragraph (b)(4)
as follows:
I
§ 48.2
Definitions.
wwhite on PROD1PC65 with RULES4
*
*
*
*
*
(a)(1) Miner means, for purposes of
§§ 48.3 through 48.10 of this subpart A,
any person working in an underground
mine and who is engaged in the
extraction and production process, or
engaged in shaft or slope construction,
or who is regularly exposed to mine
hazards, or who is a maintenance or
service worker employed by the
operator or a maintenance or service
worker contracted by the operator to
work at the mine for frequent or
extended periods. This definition shall
include the operator if the operator
works underground on a continuing,
even if irregular basis. Short-term,
specialized contract workers, such as
drillers and blasters, who are engaged in
the extraction and production process or
engaged in shaft or slope construction
and who have received training under
VerDate Aug<31>2005
20:02 Dec 29, 2005
Jkt 208001
§ 48.8 Annual refresher training of miners;
minimum courses of instruction; hours of
instruction.
*
*
*
*
*
(d) All persons employed as shaft or
slope construction workers on June 28,
PO 00000
Frm 00013
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
77727
2006 must receive annual refresher
training within 12 months of June 2006.
*
*
*
*
*
Subpart B—[Amended]
5. Section 48.22 is amended by
revising paragraphs (a)(1) introductory
text and (a)(1)(i) and by adding
paragraph (b)(4) as follows:
I
§ 48.22
Definitions.
*
*
*
*
*
(a)(1) Miner means, for purposes of
§§ 48.23 through 48.30 of this subpart B,
any person working in a surface mine or
surface areas of an underground mine
and who is engaged in the extraction
and production process, or engaged in
shaft or slope construction, or who is
regularly exposed to mine hazards, or
who is a maintenance or service worker
employed by the operator or a
maintenance or service worker
contracted by the operator to work at the
mine for frequent or extended periods.
This definition shall include the
operator if the operator works at the
mine on a continuing, even if irregular,
basis. Short-term, specialized contract
workers, such as drillers and blasters,
who are engaged in the extraction and
production process or engaged in shaft
or slope construction and who have
received training under § 48.26
(Experienced miner training) of this
subpart B, may in lieu of subsequent
training under that section for each new
employment, receive training under
§ 48.31 (Hazard training) of this subpart
B. This definition does not include:
(i) Construction workers under
subpart C of this Part 48;
*
*
*
*
*
(b) * * *
*
*
*
*
*
(4)(i) A person employed as a surface
shaft or slope construction worker on
the June 28, 2006; or,
(ii) A person who has six months of
surface shaft or slope experience within
24 months before June 28, 2006.
*
*
*
*
*
I 6. Section 48.23 is amended by
revising paragraph (a) introductory text
and adding paragraph (o) as follows:
§ 48.23 Training plans; time of
submission; where filed; information
required; time for approval; method for
disapproval; commencement of training;
approval of instructors.
(a) Except as provided in paragraph
(o) of this section, each operator of a
surface mine shall have an MSHAapproved plan containing programs for
training new miners, training
experienced miners, training miners for
new tasks, annual refresher training,
E:\FR\FM\30DER4.SGM
30DER4
77728
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 250 / Friday, December 30, 2005 / Rules and Regulations
and hazard training for miners as
follows:
*
*
*
*
*
(o) Each operator engaged in shaft or
slope construction shall have an MSHAapproved training plan, as outlined in
this section, containing programs for
training new miners, training
experienced miners, training miners for
new tasks, annual refresher training,
and hazard training for miners as
follows:
(1) In the case of an operator engaged
in shaft or slope construction on
December 30, 2005, the operator shall
submit a plan for approval by May 1,
2006, unless extended by MSHA.
(2) In the case of a new shaft or slope
construction operator after June 28,
2006, the operator shall have an
approved plan prior to commencing
shaft or slope construction.
I 7. Paragraph (d) of § 48.28 is revised
to read as follows:
§ 48.8 Annual refresher training of miners;
minimum courses of instruction; hours of
instruction.
*
*
*
*
*
(d) All persons employed as shaft or
slope construction workers on June 28,
2006 must receive annual refresher
training within 12 months of June 2006.
*
*
*
*
*
[FR Doc. 05–24624 Filed 12–29–05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510–43–P
DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
Mine Safety and Health Administration
30 CFR Part 75
RIN 1219–AA98
Low- and Medium-Voltage DieselPowered Electrical Generators
Mine Safety and Health
Administration (MSHA), Labor.
ACTION: Final rule.
wwhite on PROD1PC65 with RULES4
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: This final rule amends an
existing safety standard to allow the use
of low- and medium-voltage dieselpowered electrical generators as an
alternative means of powering electrical
equipment in underground coal mines.
The final rule eliminates the need for
mine operators to file petitions for
modification to use these portable
generators to power electrical
equipment and does not reduce the
protections afforded miners by the
existing standards, in fact it increases
protections.
EFFECTIVE DATE: February 28, 2006.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Rebecca J. Smith, Acting Director, Office
VerDate Aug<31>2005
20:02 Dec 29, 2005
Jkt 208001
of Standards, Regulations and
Variances, MSHA, 1100 Wilson
Boulevard, Arlington, Virginia 22209–
3939. Ms. Smith can be reached at
smith.rebecca@dol.gov (Internet e-mail)
(202–693–9443) (voice) or (202–693–
9441) (facsimile). The final rule also is
available on the Internet at https://
www.msha.gov/REGSINFO.HTM.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background Information
We (MSHA) are amending § 75.901 to
permit the use of low- and mediumvoltage diesel-powered electrical
generators as a means for providing a
portable source of power to move
equipment in, out, and around the mine
and to perform work in areas where
permissible equipment is not required.
This final rule does not reduce the
protections for miners in the current
standards, but increases miner safety by
updating the electrical requirements
with new commercially-available
technology so miners may use dieselpowered electrical generators as a
source of power. The final rule provides
protective systems and testing
procedures to limit the amount of
voltage and current that miners can be
exposed to under ground fault
conditions; thus, it reduces the
possibility of a fire, shock, or burn
hazard when miners use these
generators.
Furthermore, by issuing this final
rule, we are responding to the
requirements of the Regulatory
Flexibility Act and Executive Order
12866 that agencies review their
regulations to determine their
effectiveness and to implement any
changes indicated by the review that
will make the regulation more flexible
and efficient for stakeholders and small
businesses. In accordance with the
requirements of the Mine Act,
§ 101(a)(9), this final rule does not
reduce the protection afforded to miners
by the existing standard.
Generally, power centers are the main
means of supplying electricity in an
underground mine. Power centers are
placed underground to provide power to
permanent or stationary electrical
equipment, such as belt conveyor
drives, and to mining equipment on
working sections. Power centers in areas
where permissible equipment is not
required are generally stationary. Mine
operators use various means to move
electrical equipment and to perform
work in areas where permissible
equipment is not required. In these
situations, they are unable to use power
centers to energize the machines for the
move because of the excessive length of
PO 00000
Frm 00014
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
cable required to reach the power
center. If longer trailing cables are
installed in order to reach remote power
centers, proper electrical protection for
these low- and medium-voltage threephase circuits may be compromised and
overheating of, or damage to the cables
may occur.
Over a 13-year period (1990–2003),
through our petition for modification
(PFM) process, mine operators have
been using low- and medium-voltage
diesel-powered electrical generators as
an efficient means for providing a
portable source of power to move and
operate electrical equipment in areas
where permissible equipment is not
required. These portable diesel-powered
electrical generators are easily taken to
areas where power centers or other
sources of electrical power are not
available to move mobile equipment or
supply power to other electric
equipment needed to do work in outby
areas. Proper electrical protection for
these low- and medium-voltage threephase circuits can safely be provided by
portable diesel-powered electrical
generators.
Existing mandatory safety standards
§ 75.701 (Grounding metallic frames,
casings, and other enclosures of electric
equipment) and § 75.901 (Protection of
low- and medium-voltage three-phase
circuits used underground), specify the
grounding requirements for electrical
equipment and low- and mediumvoltage three-phase circuits. However,
when using these generators, mine
operators are unable to comply with the
existing electrical protection
requirements of § 75.901. Currently,
§ 75.901 requires a grounding circuit to
originate from the grounded side of a
grounding resistor located at a power
center. In addition, § 75.901 does not
address the use of a generator frame for
the purpose of grounding.
To address their inability to comply
with § 75.901, mine operators file PFMs
under section 101(c) of the Federal Mine
Safety and Health Act of 1977 (Mine
Act). PFMs may be granted when the
Secretary determines that an alternative
method of achieving the result of a
standard exists that will at all times
guarantee the same measure of
protection afforded to miners under a
standard, or when the application of a
standard to the mine will result in a
diminution of safety to the miners at the
mine. The PFM process results in safety
requirements and procedures that are
applicable only to an individual mine.
Once a final written decision pertaining
to a PFM has been issued, the governing
terms and conditions contained in the
decision become the mandatory
standard at the individual mine. After
E:\FR\FM\30DER4.SGM
30DER4
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 250 (Friday, December 30, 2005)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 77716-77728]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-24624]
[[Page 77715]]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Part VII
Department of Labor
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Mine Safety and Health Administration
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
30 CFR Part 48
Shaft and Slope Construction Workers at Underground Mines and Surface
Areas of Underground Mines; Final Rule
30 CFR Part 75
Low- and Medium-Voltage Diesel-Powered Electrical Generators; Final
Rule
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 250 / Friday, December 30, 2005 /
Rules and Regulations
[[Page 77716]]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
Mine Safety and Health Administration
30 CFR Part 48
RIN 1219-AB35
Training Standards for Shaft and Slope Construction Workers at
Underground Mines and Surface Areas of Underground Mines
AGENCY: Mine Safety and Health Administration (MSHA), Labor.
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: We (MSHA) are revising certain provisions of our regulations
addressing the training and retraining of miners. This final rule
removes the training exclusion for shaft and slope construction
workers. Shaft and slope construction workers will now receive training
for new miners, training for experienced miners, task training, annual
refresher training, and hazard training. The rule will provide shaft
and slope construction workers with the same type of safety and health
training afforded other miners.
EFFECTIVE DATE: This regulation is effective June 28, 2006, except that
Sec. Sec. 48.3(o) and 48.23(o) are effective December 30, 2005.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Rebecca J. Smith, Acting Director,
Office of Standards, Regulations and Variances, MSHA; 1100 Wilson
Boulevard, Room 2350, Arlington, Virginia 22209-3939; telephone (202)
693-9440; e-mail: Smith.Rebecca@dol.gov; or facsimile (202) 693-9441.
The final rule is available on the Internet at https://www.msha.gov/
REGINFO.HTM.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The preamble to this final rule discusses
the proposed requirements for training shaft and slope construction
workers, comments received on the proposed rule, our analysis of
accident and injury data, and the section-by-section discussion of our
final rule determinations. To help the reader, the preamble discussion
follows this outline:
I. Background
II. Discussion of Final Rule
A. Introduction
--Analysis of accident and injury data
--Comparative tasks and hazards
--Diverse small and mobile crews
--Applicability of part 48 training
1. Miners' Rights
2. Self-Rescue and Respiratory Devices
3. Entering and Leaving the Mine; Transportation; Communications
4. Introduction to the Work Environment
5. Mine Map; Escapeways; Emergency Evacuation; Barricading
6. Roof or Ground Control and Ventilation Plans
7. Health
8. Clean-Up; Rock Dusting
9. Hazard Recognition
10. Electrical Hazards
11. First Aid
12. Mine Gases
13. Health and Safety Aspects of Tasks
14. Other Courses Required by the District Manager
--Compliance Assistance
B. Section-by-Section Analysis
1. Sections 48.2(a)(1) and 48.22(a)(1) Definitions
--Clarification of terms
--Coverage of all construction workers and Subpart C
--Comprehensive training or hazard training
--Applicability of Part 48 subpart A training (Underground) and
subpart B training (Surface)
2. Sections 48.2(b)(4) and 48.22(b)(4) ``Experienced Miner''
--Qualifications and grandfather provision
3. Sections 48.3 and 48.23 Training Plans
a. Shaft and Slope Training Plans
b. Training Plan Development, Submission and Approval
c. Training Programs and Hours
d. Crediting Prior Training and Experience
e. Approved Instructors
4. Sections 48.8 and 48.28 Annual Refresher Training
5. Effective Date
III. Executive Order 12866
IV. Feasibility
V. Regulatory Flexibility Act Certification
VI. Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995
VII. Other Regulatory Considerations
A. The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
B. National Environmental Policy Act
C. The Treasury and General Government Appropriations Act of
1999: Assessment of Federal Regulations and Policies on Families
D. Executive Order 12630: Government Actions and Interference
With Constitutionally Protected Property Rights
E. Executive Order 12988: Civil Justice Reform
F. Executive Order 13045: Protection of Children From
Environmental Health and Safety Risks
G. Executive Order 13132: Federalism
H. Executive Order 13175: Consultation and Coordination With
Indian Tribal Governments
I. Executive Order 13211: Actions Concerning Regulations That
Significantly Affect Energy, Supply, Distribution, or Use
J. Executive Order 13272: Proper Consideration of Small Entities
in Agency Rulemaking
VIII. Regulatory Text
I. Background
On October 13, 1978, we promulgated regulations concerning the
training and retraining of miners in Title 30 Code of Federal
Regulations (CFR) part 48 (43 FR 47453), as provided for in section 115
of the Federal Mine Safety and Health Act of 1977 (Mine Act), 30 U.S.C.
825. Section 115(d) also provided that the Secretary of Labor
promulgate ``appropriate standards for safety and health training for
coal or other construction workers.'' Accordingly, we determined that
certain underground mine construction workers were exposed to
significant mining hazards in ongoing operations, and included those
construction workers under the coverage of part 48 training standards
published in 1978. However, we specifically excluded from the coverage
certain other construction workers including shaft and slope
construction workers.
On September 30, 1999, we published a final rule, 30 CFR part 46,
(64 FR 53080), containing training requirements for specific sectors of
the mining industry, including shell dredging, sand, gravel, surface
stone, surface clay, colloidal phosphate, and surface limestone mines.
That rule covers, among other miners, construction workers who are
exposed to hazards of mining operations.
Following the January 2003 accident that occurred during shaft
construction at the McElroy Mine, we reviewed mine fatality records
from January 1982 through August 2003. The review indicated that miners
performing shaft and slope construction work should receive the same
training as other underground and surface miners. On July 16, 2004, we
proposed to remove the part 48 training exclusion for shaft and slope
construction workers (69 FR 42841). Under the proposed rule, shaft and
slope construction workers would be treated like extraction and
production miners and subject to the part 48 training requirements.
The public was invited to submit comments. We held hearings in Salt
Lake City, Utah on August 24, 2004, and Arlington, Virginia on August
26, 2004. The hearing record remained open until September 14, 2004 for
post-hearing comments. Eight persons presented oral comments at the
hearings, and we received six written comments. Most of the commenters
were from the shaft and slope construction industry. All of the
comments have been considered in the development of this final rule.
II. Discussion of Final Rule
A. Introduction
The final rule eliminates the part 48 training exclusion found in
Sec. Sec. 48.2(a)(1)(i) and 48.22(a)(1)(i) for shaft and slope
construction workers. ``Shaft and slope construction workers'' include
``shaft and slope workers'' and ``workers engaged in construction
[[Page 77717]]
activities ancillary to shaft and slope sinking.'' Under this final
rule, these miners will receive comprehensive safety and health
training like other miners who are significantly exposed to mining
hazards. Shaft and slope construction operators, like other mine
operators, must train their miners according to an MSHA approved
training plan.
There is a clear need for this rule. As discussed in the preamble
to the proposed rule (64 FR 42841), we reviewed mine accident fatality
records from January 1982 through August 2003. In that period, there
were 15 fatalities among miners performing shaft and slope construction
work, including the shaft construction accident at McElroy Mine in West
Virginia in January 2003 that took the lives of three miners. One
commenter took exception to the inclusion in our fatality data of four
miners who were fatally injured in capping a shaft at the Blacksville
No. 1 mine in 1992. The commenter contended that this event involved
construction work in and around a surface mine, and had nothing to do
with the actual mining process or the development of the shaft. While
it is true that the operator was closing a shaft, we believe that shaft
construction can reasonably include such additional construction
necessary to effect closure.
Some commenters maintained that this rule is not appropriate for
the shaft and slope construction industry. They said that the rule
would be burdensome and our estimated costs were too low. In
calculating the costs of the proposed rule, we used mining industry-
wide data as the basis for turnover rate, retention rate, and miners'
level of experience. The commenters, however, disputed these
assumptions as inaccurate for the shaft and slope sector. Based on
their comments and our reanalysis of the data, we have recalculated the
costs of the rule and, while having increased our cost estimates, we
have concluded that the rule is economically feasible, as explained in
Section III in this preamble and in the Regulatory Economic Analysis
(REA).
Analysis of Accident and Injury Data
Commenters were concerned about the appropriateness of the 40 hour
new underground miner training requirement. In response to these
comments, we further analyzed the accident rate data for new miners
obtained from our part 50 database (Notification, Investigation,
Reports and Records of Accidents, Injuries, Illnesses, Employment, and
Coal Production in Mines) for the period January 1994 through March 14,
2005. Mine operators and independent contractors, including shaft and
slope construction operators, are required to file these reports.
The purpose of this analysis was to further evaluate the need for
comprehensive training. This analysis is a snapshot of a subset of the
current shaft and slope industry. It is indicative of safety
performance.
There were 219,703 accidents reported in the period, January 1994
to March 14, 2005. For comparative purposes we did a separate analysis
of: (1) Employee accidents from all mining operations, (2) six shaft
and slope construction companies, five of which, according to one
commenter represented the majority of the shaft and slope industry, and
(3) all independent contractors excluding the six shaft and slope
construction companies. We eliminated all records where no data was
entered in the field for ``Total Mining Experience.'' We counted all
reported accidents of miners, shaft and slope construction workers, and
independent contractors with one year or less of total mining
experience. Table 1 outlines the results of our analysis:
Table 1.--Reported Accidents--Miners With Less Than One Year of Total Mining Experience
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total
Class accidents 1 year or less Percent
reported
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Mine Employees \1\.............................................. 161,160 19,783 12.27
Independent Contractor Employees \2\............................ 11,542 3,699 32.05
Shaft and Slope Employees....................................... 583 257 44.08
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ Excludes independent contractors and the six shaft and slope construction companies.
\2\ Excludes shaft and slope construction companies.
We found that in the mining industry, excluding all independent
contractors, new miners account for 12.27% of the total reported
accidents for that group. For independent contractors, excluding shaft
and slope companies, new miners were involved in 32.05% of the total.
By contrast, new shaft and slope construction workers accounted for
44.08% of the total accidents reported for that group.
We further reviewed the nonfatal days lost (NFDL) injury incidence
rate for six shaft and slope construction companies, and compared their
rates to the average rates for all underground and surface areas of
underground coal mines and metal/nonmetal mines. These incidence rates,
which represent the number of NFDL injuries per 200,000 miner hours,
are calculated from the part 50 accident reports submitted to us and
cover injuries of all miners, including experienced miners. The results
are summarized in Table 2.
Table 2.--NFDL Incidence Rates
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Metal UG & Coal UG &
Year surf. at UG surf. at UG Shaft & slope
operations operations
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
2003............................................................ 3.98 6.44 9.45
2002............................................................ 3.69 7.44 16.79
2001............................................................ 3.82 7.32 9.72
2000............................................................ 5.38 8.34 18.66
1999............................................................ 5.82 8.16 20.26
1998............................................................ 6.09 8.82 13.37
1997............................................................ 5.48 8.28 10.44
1996............................................................ 6.31 8.7 15.93
[[Page 77718]]
1995............................................................ 5.79 10.18 13.7
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The injury rate for shaft and slope construction is higher than the
rest of the mining industry. The results from both tables 1 and 2
indicate that shaft and slope work is dangerous and that shaft and
slope miners should be provided the same comprehensive training as
other miners.
We received comments suggesting that the hazards shaft and slope
construction workers face are distinguishable from those faced by other
miners. To address these comments, we further reviewed the data from
January 1994 through March 14, 2005 for the type of accident
classifications these three groups had reported. Table 3 outlines the
findings.
Table 3.--Top Five Accident Classifications
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Shaft & slope
Mining Independent construction
Ranking Accident classification operations contractors operations
(percent) (percent) (percent)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
1..................................... Handling of Materials... 32.44 31.87 27.24
2..................................... Slip or Fall Of Person.. 18.19 20.74 17.90
3..................................... Machinery............... 13.49 14.95 26.46
4..................................... Handtools (nonpowered).. 12.46 11.68 6.23
5..................................... Powered Haulage......... 8.74 9.33 5.45
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
As indicated in Table 3, mining operations, independent
contractors, and shaft and slope construction operations have the same
top five accident classifications. While the comparative percentages
may vary between mining sectors, the data generally indicate the
similarities in accident types throughout mining, including shaft and
slope construction.
One commenter said that hazards from working at heights distinguish
shaft and slope construction from other mining. Yet, the data in Table
3 suggest that, to the extent slip and fall hazards correlate to
heights, all miners experience about the same percentage of slip and
fall accidents.
Comparative Tasks and Hazards
In proposing the rule, we found that the tasks performed and
hazards encountered by shaft and slope construction workers were
similar to those of other miners already covered under the part 48
training provisions. Commenters stated, however, that shaft and slope
work is unique from mining and should have its own training
requirements. They said that special training requirements for their
industry should be incorporated under a new part 48, subpart C.
Commenters said that shaft and slope construction work is like other
mine construction work and differs from mining. Specifically, the
commenters noted particular tasks and hazards characteristic of shaft
and slope work, which takes place in a ``vertical environment.'' The
commenters also cited hazards incident to heights, lifting, uneven
ground, pinch points, chemicals, noise, mine gases, compressed air,
hoisting, and electricity. But these hazards are found in other types
of mining operations, where miners work in confined spaces, handle
materials, work in proximity to mobile equipment, and with and around
wire rope, and explosives and blasting and encounter falling or
sloughing material from roof and ribs.
The commenters also mentioned certain tasks specific to shaft and
slope construction, including welding, hoisting, drilling, blasting,
and mucking. While there may be some tasks that are more
characteristic, in degree or kind, to shaft and slope work, similar
tasks are conducted at other mining operations. For example, in many
cases shotcreting and mucking done in shaft and slope work is like
shotcreting and mucking done by ``muckers'' in other mining operations.
Both shaft and slope construction operations and active mines drill,
blast, and muck.
Diverse Small and Mobile Crews
Commenters described a diverse shaft and slope construction
industry, encompassing various locales, projects, mining methods and
crews. The commenters were concerned that one type of training would
not fit all.
Mining operations, which are already subject to part 48, range from
massive underground coal mines to small surface hard rock operations in
remote areas. These mining operations employ a variety of mining
methods and tasks, exposing miners to a broad array of safety and
health hazards that are addressed under the flexible training approach
of part 48. Similarly, part 48 applies to different types of mine
operators in different settings, including a variety of independent
contractors who are on mine property temporarily. Some mobile equipment
operators, for example, travel to different sites, and may not have a
formal office. For over 26 years, part 48 has successfully covered
mining operations of varying sizes, locations, circumstances, and
conditions.
Commenters pointed to high turnover rates in certain types of shaft
and slope construction operations, especially conventional underground
work. They were especially concerned about the availability of trained
labor in remote areas. Shaft and slope crews may be small, they said,
and dependent upon all miners showing up ready to work for the project
to progress on time.
There are many independent contractors in mining working in small
crews. It is our understanding that these mining operations may hire
from a local labor force that has already received 32 hours of
underground new miner training. The training may be provided through
vocational-technical schools or cooperative programs. Typically, where
state grant programs provide this training, they offer 32 hours of new
miner training for underground mining at a reasonable cost or for no
cost. With
[[Page 77719]]
32 hours of training completed, 8 hours of mine site training are given
by the operator. These new miner training programs available to the
industry have helped create the labor pool that operators may draw from
quickly.
We are mindful that causes for crew shortages extend beyond
turnover and training, for example, sickness and personal emergencies.
Short-term crew shortages commonly are handled by cross-shifting the
miners.
We expect training may facilitate a ready labor pool. Training
could alert prospective miners about a job that is not right for them,
causing them to withdraw from consideration. By taking the initiative
to be trained, new miners may be less likely to prematurely leave a job
for which they have invested an amount of time and possibly money prior
to employment. Further, contractors may retroactively compensate miners
for the training costs after working a specified period of time. This
may reduce the high turnover rates experienced by the industry.
We understand that small crews are particularly characteristic of
raised bore drilling, which constitutes a small proportion of shaft and
slope construction projects. We also understand that this type of shaft
and slope work does not experience the turnover rate of conventional
projects. Raised bore drilling is mainly from the surface; therefore,
the 24-hour new miner training applies. This allows, with District
Manager approval, for 8 hours of pre-work training, with the remaining
16 hours to be done within 60 calendar days following assignment (known
as the 8/16 split). This training conforms to the preferred approach
advocated by commenters who give their miners 8 hours of orientation
training and then proceed to train them incrementally following
assignment.
Applicability of Part 48 Training
Several commenters questioned the subject-matter applicability of
part 48 training to shaft and slope construction work. They said that
part 48 training was designed for ``miners'' and is not relevant or
useful to shaft and slope construction workers. The commenters' primary
concern, however, appears to be the 40 hour requirement (in existing
Sec. 48.5) for new underground miners.
We considered the relevance to shaft and slope construction
operations of each of the courses required in the new miner training
program under existing Sec. 48.5. Following is a discussion of the
applicability of the existing Sec. 48.5 new miner training
requirements to shaft and slope construction workers.
1. Miners' rights--This course provides all miners with important
information on supervisory responsibilities, company policies, and Mine
Act rights impacting safety and health, such as protection in reporting
hazardous conditions.
2. Self-rescue and respiratory devices--These devices are important
for all miners working in an underground mine, including drillers and
blasters. The training can be vital for shaft and slope miners because
their work area is essentially a ``one entry'' system. In addition, if
the shaft and slope intersects with an existing mine, there is exposure
to that mine's atmosphere.
3. Entering and leaving the mine; transportation; communications--
While we recognize that some shaft and slopes are not complex, shaft
and slope miners need to be instructed in how to safely enter, exit,
and handle buckets, cages, or other conveyances, as well as hoists and
cranes. Also important is their knowledge of the differences between
transportation of personnel and material, as well as communication
systems, such as how to operate the bell system and use a pager
telephone. Instruction in the use of a workdeck is needed, especially
when the workdeck is the secondary means of exit from a shaft.
4. Introduction to the work environment--This course is mine-
specific, focusing on a representative part of the operation and mining
method used. Mine operators cover this training during the mine-site
training required by part 48. For shaft and slope work, it could
emphasize the confined spaces involved and provide some appreciation of
the associated hazards. The new miner could observe hoisting activities
and became familiarized with the equipment, particularly pneumatic
equipment used in shaft and slope work. We recognize that shaft and
slope construction, like other mining, goes through different phases
and that training for those environments can also be covered in
subsequent annual refresher training and new task training.
5. Mine map; escapeways; emergency evacuation; barricading--This
course focuses on emergency procedures, which all types of operations
must have. The confined spaces and limited means of access in shaft and
slope construction can make an emergency even more significant. As with
all mining operations, applicable training adapted to the particular
operation is the objective.
6. Roof or ground control and ventilation plans--This course covers
key features regulating ground control and ventilation. At coal mines,
these features are described in the plan submitted by the shaft and
slope construction operator as required by 30 CFR part 77, subpart T
(Slope and Shaft Sinking). Roof and ground conditions are constantly
changing in shaft and slope work, and miners are regularly exposed to
unsupported ribs during the drill-blast-muck-line shaft cycle. Miners
need to be instructed in examination methods, so they can recognize
failing or inadequate roof support and maintain adequate ventilation.
7. Health--This course covers the purposes of taking exposure
measurements, which is required as part of the shaft and slope
construction plan for coal mines. Shaft and slope miners are commonly
exposed to dust, noise, and chemicals. They are exposed to dust while
drilling and mucking, and may be involved in activities that exceed
noise action levels. The training also includes the operators' hazard
communication program, which is vital for shaft and slope miners who
work with and around oils, diesel fuel, concrete additives, and other
hazardous chemicals.
8. Cleanup; rock dusting--Cleanup is essential on a workdeck or
elevated platform to remove tripping hazards and falls from elevations,
and to prevent loose materials from falling and striking someone below.
Water may make the workdeck extremely slick, and good housekeeping
minimizes slipping hazards. The rock dust component of this training
applies to those shaft and slope projects involving rock dusting. When
shaft and slope development reaches a coal seam, the rock dusting
program becomes important for miners who may spend considerable time in
a ``coal environment.''
9. Hazard recognition--This is key training in any safety and
health program. Shaft and slope construction hazards, like those of
other mining operations, involve working in confined spaces, handling
materials, and working in proximity to mobile equipment. The hazards
also include slips and falls, falling or sloughing materials from roof
and ribs, hoisting and wire rope hazards, and methane. Other hazards
characteristic of shaft and slope operations are hazards incident to
height, compressed air, and working under suspended loads. The course
especially mentions hazards relating to explosives. This is important
training because blasting is a prominent feature of many shaft and
slope projects.
10. Electrical hazards--While the only electricity used underground
may be the blasting cable, blasting may be a prominent feature of the
work and may
[[Page 77720]]
be conducted around water. A number of sources of electricity are
typically found on the surface. Surface operations commonly have an
electrical substation. There are also circuit breakers for the fan,
hoist, compressors, and other equipment that needs to be energized and
de-energized. Anyone working in or around the hoist house, in
particular, should be instructed on the electrical hazards. Commenters
mentioned that they commonly face shock and electrical hazards in shaft
and slope construction.
11. First aid--This training applies to all mine environments and
persons working on mine property. In shaft and slope construction,
transporting an injured person can be problematic because of the
difficulty in getting the person into a bucket or carrying the person
out of a slope for which the means of egress is walking. Shaft and
slope crews frequently are small, with only one person fully qualified
to administer first aid. This increases the importance of first aid
training for the other miners.
12. Mine gases--Shaft and slope miners may work in methane and
oxygen deficient atmospheres. Gases have been, and continue to be, a
problem in some shaft and slope operations. Shaft and slope companies
recognize this problem and, as applicable, are required to submit shaft
and slope plans addressing methane and oxygen deficiency tests. There
may be other workplace exposures, such as diesel equipment exhaust
gases.
13. Health and safety aspects of tasks--This course is practically
oriented to the specific duties that new shaft and slope miners will be
performing. As miners are assigned new tasks, they will also receive
new task training, including health and safety aspects of those tasks.
14. Other courses required by the District Manager--When additional
training is required, it should be focused on the particular training
needs of the operation. Circumstances may justify, for example, having
special emphasis training on scaling, fall protection, rigging,
compressed air, explosives, or hoisting.
As described above, part 48 new miner courses are relevant and
flexible to the needs of shaft and slope miners. The training serves as
a general primer for introducing new shaft and slope construction
miners to hazards they are likely to face and the ways those hazards
can be effectively avoided. The training also provides an overview of
mining methods, conditions, and circumstances that can be problematic
to persons new to mining. Such training takes time to accomplish and we
believe 40 hours is appropriate to prepare a new miner for the rigors
and hazards of a dangerous underground environment.
We also note that some shaft and slope projects occur around other
mining operations. Other mine personnel may assist the shaft and slope
workers. For example, ream cuttings from raised drill work commonly are
removed by mine personnel. It is important that the shaft and slope
construction workers be fully trained so that they do not present a
hazard to themselves or to the other miners.
Part 48 does not force operators to provide training that does not
apply to their operations. We recognize that different mining
operations have different training needs and should emphasize different
aspects of the training. It is left primarily to the mine operator to
provide training that is meaningful to the miners within the course
framework of part 48. Part 48, in effect, requires that the subject
matter be relevant to the particular mining operation. As one industry
commenter observed, part 48 is a ``container that all sorts of types of
training could go into.''
A commenter questioned whether the absence of training contributed
to fatalities. Section 115 of the Mine Act specifically recognized the
role training plays in mine safety. While, in 1978, we promulgated part
48 training regulations, in many cases part 48 training did not begin
until late in 1979. In 1979 there were 267 mining related fatalities.
Twenty-four years later, in 2003, the mining industry recorded 56 fatal
accidents. Further, at underground and surface areas of underground
mines there were 18,873 nonfatal days lost (NFDL) in 1979 and 3,043 in
2003.
As indicated in Table 3, operations that are required to conduct
part 48 training have experienced a lower NFDL incidence rate. While we
do not believe training was the only reason for the reduction in
accidents, we believe it has played a significant role.
We acknowledge that shaft and slope construction operators already
provide some training. However, by requiring part 48 training for shaft
and slope construction workers, we ensure they receive the same type of
safety and health training as all other miners. Requiring part 48
training assures that shaft and slope construction workers will receive
the training they need on a timely basis from approved instructors.
Section 101(a)(9) of the Mine Act provides that no promulgated
standard shall reduce the protection afforded miners by an existing
mandatory health or safety standard. By promoting consistent,
comprehensive training for miners previously excluded, the final rule
increases health and safety protections for miners, and is fully
consonant with Section 101(a)(9).
Compliance Assistance
We will offer compliance assistance to the shaft and slope
construction operators. Our Educational Field Service will assist with
the assessment of training needs and in developing training programs
for shaft and slope construction operations. Additionally, other
resources are available for developing training such as the American
National Standards Institute criteria (ANSI Z490.1-2001) as suggested
by one commenter.
B. Section-by-Section Analysis
1. Sections 48.2(a)(1) and 48.22(a)(1) Definitions Shaft and Slope
Construction Workers as ``Miners''
Existing Sec. Sec. 48.2(a)(1) and 48.22(a)(1) contain the
definition of ``miner'' under part 48. We proposed to delete the
exclusion contained in subparagraph (i), for ``shaft and slope
workers'' and, for underground, ``workers engaged in construction
activities ancillary to shaft and slope construction.'' The definition
of ``miner'' for training purposes would include any person engaged in
shaft or slope construction. The final rule is unchanged from the
proposed rule.
A commenter said that shaft and slope construction workers are not
``miners'' and should not be subject to training requirements for
miners.
Section 3(g) of the Mine Act defines ``miner'' as any individual
working in a mine. Additionally, Section 3(h)(1) of the Mine Act
defines ``mine'' to include, among other things, any shafts, slopes,
facilities, and equipment used in or to be used in mining. Section
115(d) discusses rulemaking for mine construction workers. Congress
recognized that construction work is a part of mining. The terms of the
Mine Act encompass shaft and slope construction workers, both surface
and underground, as ``miners.'' The Mine Act's implementing regulations
and standards found in 30 CFR apply to shaft and slope and other
construction operations. For example, the training requirements under
30 CFR part 46 cover construction workers exposed to hazards of mining
operations.
Clarification of Terms
A commenter requested that the term ``shaft and slope workers''
appearing in the current exclusion be clarified. Another commenter
asked what is intended by ``ancillary'' construction activities. Yet
another commenter said
[[Page 77721]]
that ``shaft and slope construction'' should be defined, and another
inquired about including preliminary work.
In response, we have taken the terms from the current training
exclusion, ``shaft and slope workers'' and, additionally for
underground, ``workers engaged in construction activities ancillary to
shaft and slope sinking,'' and referred to them as ``any person * * *
engaged in shaft and slope construction,'' or ``shaft and slope
construction workers.''
Shaft and slope workers'' refers to miners involved in shaft and
slope construction activities such as: drilling, blasting, mucking,
loading, installing equipment in the completed shaft or slope, opening
up the excavation, sinking and lining a hole, grouting the shaft, and
installing panning, shaft steel, and the fan over the shaft or hoist.
In addition to the construction activities listed above, ``shaft
and slope construction work'' encompasses construction incidental to
sinking the shaft or slope and is commonly performed by shaft and slope
contractors. On the surface, this includes construction such as
building a hoist house or installing a permanent hoist. In the
underground context, this construction was referenced in the existing
rule as ``ancillary'' construction activities and includes construction
such as the building of equipment housing or mine shaft facilities.
Shaft and slope construction activities pertain to the various
types of shaft and slope operations, including conventional, raised
bore drilling, and blind drilling, as applicable. The approach is
functional; thus a company may do any number of activities and be
considered involved in shaft and slope construction work. A shaft and
slope construction company may contract with other companies to do some
of these activities, in which case all of the companies would be
performing shaft and slope construction work. Shaft and slope
construction work does not include preliminary work, such as road
building, timbering, and site clearance, typically not performed by
shaft and slope construction operations.
Coverage of All Construction Workers and Subpart C
Commenters said that special training requirements should be
developed and applied to all mine construction workers, not just shaft
and slope construction workers, and contained in a new subpart C to
part 48. Some commenters stated that the Mine Act requires separate
training standards for construction workers.
In addressing these comments we point to Section 115(d) of the Mine
Act, which authorizes us to issue ``appropriate'' construction training
standards. There is no statutory requirement for training standards
that apply exclusively to mine construction workers. As we previously
stated, the part 46 miner training requirements apply to construction
workers at covered operations. Likewise, as explained in this preamble,
experience has shown that shaft and slope construction workers perform
work and face hazards similar to other miners and should receive
similar training. Moreover, most shaft and slope construction workers
perform work underground, and the Mine Act acknowledges that such
construction workers may not be practicably differentiated from other
underground miners. Indeed, the legislative history of the Mine Act
evidences a congressional belief that underground construction workers
generally face the same hazards as do other underground miners.
A commenter said that the part 48 training exclusion should be
eliminated for all mine construction workers, not just those engaged in
shaft or slope construction.
We have analyzed the accident and injury data for shaft and slope
construction workers and we believe it supports the need to eliminate
the training exclusion for them. However, we are not prepared at this
time to expand the rulemaking to cover other construction workers. Any
rulemaking for other mine construction workers is reserved for future
consideration consistent with Section 115(d) of the Mine Act.
Comprehensive Training or Hazard Training
We proposed to apply the comprehensive training requirements of
part 48 to all shaft and slope construction workers. Consequently, they
would receive new miner, experienced miner, task, and annual refresher
training, as applicable. One commenter suggested that only hazard
training would be appropriate for persons working on-site for five days
or less. Like extraction and production miners, shaft and slope
construction workers face hazards that are significant. The final rule
accordingly requires all shaft and slope construction workers to
complete comprehensive training without regard to the amount of time
spent on-site. However, we recognize that shaft and slope construction
companies may contract out some maintenance and service jobs. In
keeping with existing requirements, such maintenance or service
contractors, who are not at the mine for frequent periods or extended
periods of more than five days, would receive hazard training, and not
be required to receive comprehensive training.
Further, the final rule, like the proposed rule, applies the short-
term specialized contractor provision in Sec. Sec. 48.2(a)(1) and
48.22(a)(1) to shaft and slope construction workers who move from site-
to-site. Such miners who have received experienced miner training could
receive hazard training at each new site. There was no comment on this
provision and the final rule remains unchanged.
Applicability of Part 48 Subpart A Training (Underground) and Subpart B
Training (Surface)
Many shaft and slope construction workers work underground. Subpart
A training would apply to them. Commenters pointed out that there are
some types of shaft and slope construction operations, such as blind
drilling operations, where the miners are only on the surface. In those
cases, subpart B training would apply.
Most shaft and slope construction workers perform both surface and
underground work. There are shaft and slope miners who, for example,
mobilize a project by building surface facilities in preparation of
shaft sinking, and then proceed to work underground. Commenters asked
whether both subpart A training and subpart B training would apply, and
if new miners falling under both sections would have to take a possible
total of 64 hours of training before being assigned work duties.
Additionally, a commenter asked whether those individuals who completed
the training would be considered both experienced underground and
surface miners.
A new miner training program of 40 hours would suffice for these
miners, but only to the extent that the miners are specifically hired
to work both on the surface and underground. This training would not
apply, for example, to surface miners who are only subject to subpart B
training, and are later reassigned to work underground (these miners
would then have to take training for new underground miners).
The focus of the training is flexible and should reflect the needs
of the miners. As underground activities are emphasized, we anticipate
that the training will focus on the underground duties, with some
surface training. For example, initial practical orientation at the
beginning of a project could contain instruction germane to an
underground environment, such as fall protection,
[[Page 77722]]
rigging, and familiarization of equipment, tools, and safety
procedures, such as bell signals. These miners will be considered
underground miners for training purposes. After they complete the
training, they can work at surface areas of a shaft or slope
construction site or underground. Once these miners have worked 12
months at a shaft or slope construction site or in an underground mine,
they will be considered experienced underground miners for life.
2. Sections 48.2(b)(4) and 48.22(b)(4) ``Experienced Miner''
Qualifications and Grandfather Provision
Existing Sec. Sec. 48.2(b) and 48.22(b) define ``experienced
miner'' as: (1) A miner who has completed MSHA-approved new miner
training or training acceptable to MSHA from a State agency, and who
has had at least 12 months of mining experience; (2) a supervisor who
is certified under an MSHA-approved State certification program and who
is employed as a supervisor on October 6, 1998; or (3) an experienced
miner on February 9, 1999.
We proposed to amend 48.2(b) and 48.22(b) to add a new paragraph
(b)(4) specifying that miners employed as shaft and slope construction
workers on the effective date of the final rule are ``experienced
miners.''
Commenters said that the proposed rule was too limited and did not
recognize the transient nature of shaft and slope construction work.
They suggested an additional grandfather provision for miners who have
six months experience within the 24 month period before the effective
date of the rule. We agree. The final rule specifies that shaft and
slope construction workers, either who are employed on the effective
date of this rule, or who have six months of shaft or slope
construction experience within the 24 month period before the effective
date, are ``experienced miners.'' The final rule makes clear that an
``experienced miner'' status for surface or underground purposes is
accorded to current surface workers or underground workers,
respectively. This grandfather provision is intended to recognize
previous experience of those miners who are already employed in shaft
and slope construction.
One commenter suggested the grandfather provision be expanded to
include all shaft and slope construction workers regardless of when
they were employed. The commenter also recommended that Occupational
Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) training in the previous 12
months and 12 months cumulative experience should qualify shaft and
slope construction workers as ``experienced.''
We do not believe that such expansion of the grandfather and
``experienced miner'' provisions for shaft and slope construction is
justified. The grandfather provision should be limited to those miners
who currently are or recently have been a part of shaft and slope
construction. We are mindful, however, that shaft and slope
construction is no less dangerous than extraction and production and
other mine contract work. The experienced miner requirements for shaft
and slope construction workers generally should be like those of other
miners. Moreover, the training they receive needs to be appropriate for
mining.
Some commenters were concerned that the status of being an
``experienced miner'' may not be permanent for shaft and slope
construction workers. Consistent with the current rule, the final rule
provides that once a miner is an ``experienced miner,'' that miner is
always an ``experienced miner'' for training purposes.
The final rule retains the approach of the current rule under which
there are two basic ways of becoming an ``experienced miner'': Through
the grandfather provision, or through a combination of training and
experience. Once a shaft and slope construction worker is an
``experienced miner'' for underground or surface purposes, that status
carries over to other underground or surface mining operations,
respectively. Similarly, an experienced miner coming from another type
of mining operation is considered an experienced miner for shaft and
slope construction.
3. Sections 48.3 and 48.23 Training Plans
a. Shaft and Slope Training Plans
Sections 48.3 and 48.23 require each mine operator to have an MSHA-
approved plan containing programs for new miner training, experienced
miner training, new task training, annual refresher training, and
hazard training. The standards contain the specific requirements for
filing, approval and disapproval of training plans, and commencement of
training.
We proposed a new paragraph (o) that would require shaft and slope
construction operators to have an approved training plan. This was
implementing language, allowing a reasonable amount of time for
operators to obtain an approved plan. The final rule retains this
provision.
Several commenters expressed concern that this would mean they
would be required to have a new plan developed and approved for each
new project. Like other independent contractors that are mobile and
work at different sites, the shaft and slope construction operators can
have one training plan for all of their project sites.
Some shaft and slope construction operators work in different MSHA
districts, and commenters were concerned about varying interpretations
affecting approval from the districts. A plan approved in one MSHA
district is considered approved in all other MSHA districts.
Commenters also said that shaft and slope construction operators
should have the option to have their own plan or use the plan of other
mine operators. Consistent with the existing rule and practice for
other mine operators, shaft and slope construction operators may opt to
have their own plan or use the plan of another operator or programs of
a cooperative, provided that the plan adequately addresses hazards
characteristic of the shaft and slope construction work (existing
Sec. Sec. 48.4 and 48.24).
b. Training Plan Development, Submission, and Approval
We proposed in the new paragraph (o) to allow current shaft and
slope construction operators 120 days from the date the final rule is
published, unless extended by us, to submit a training plan. There were
no adverse comments on the proposed provision, and the final rule
remains unchanged. The shaft and slope construction operators are
subject as well to existing plan development requirements of notice and
posting under Sec. Sec. 48.3(d)/48.23(d).
Some commenters were concerned about the applicability of the
training plan requirements to the schedule of shaft and slope
construction projects. One commenter indicated the requirements of plan
development, such as the two week notice to miners' representatives,
would be impractical. Another commenter supported the 120 day timeframe
but said that we should waive this provision on a case-by-case basis to
accommodate new shaft and slope construction projects started on short
notice.
We believe the requirements are reasonable. They have been applied
successfully to other independent mine contractors who acquire work on
short notice. Miner input into training will be no less valuable in
shaft and slope construction than in other mining operations. Shaft and
slope construction contractors can use one plan to basically cover all
projects and do not need to
[[Page 77723]]
constantly create new plans as they move from mine to mine.
Under the proposed rule, new operators must have a training plan
prior to commencing operations. This is consistent with the requirement
for other mining operations. We did not receive any comments on this
provision. We have added the date of 180 days after the rule's
publication to clarify what is meant by a ``new'' operator. Otherwise,
the provision remains unchanged in the final rule.
For a new shaft and slope construction operation that begins work
after the publication date and before [insert date 180 days after the
date of publication] we will allow the same number of days as existing
operators to submit a plan (120 days), commencing from the work
starting date.
c. Training Programs and Hours
Under the proposed rule, the required training plan would contain
programs for training new miners, training experienced miners, task
training, annual refresher training, and hazard training. The final
rule retained these requirements.
The new miner training requirements drew numerous comments. They
said that the requirements of 40 hours for underground and 24 hours for
surface are excessive and unduly focus on classroom instruction.
Those hour requirements are in the current rule covering other
mining operations and are taken from section 115(a) of the Mine Act.
Congress felt they were appropriate for new miners entering into a
hazardous environment. New shaft and slope construction miners, like
other miners, work in a dangerous environment and are exposed to
potentially lethal hazards. These miners must receive the amount of
training necessary for them to adequately cope with the hazards of
their job.
While many mine operators take advantage of classroom instruction,
there is no requirement for classroom training. The regulations provide
that the training must duplicate the actual mining conditions to the
extent practicable and approximately 8 hours of training is to be
conducted at the mine.
Commenters stated that the part 48 new miner training places too
much emphasis on training before assignment to duties. They said that
training is more effectively done in intervals while on-the-job. One
commenter remarked about the short attention span of workers.
Commenters said they have, for example, 4 to 8 hours of orientation
training, task training over a number of shifts with recorded
supervisor observations, and safety training at periodic meetings.
Constructing a shaft or slope can present a work environment where
hazards may not be easily identified without advance training. Shaft
and slope construction workers, like other miners, are not necessarily
presented hazards one at a time, but may be exposed to several hazards
at once (unstable ground, tripping, gases, and mobile equipment, for
example). New shaft and slope construction workers, like other new
miners, should not be subject to work hazards before they are fully
trained. The Mine Act contemplates that a significant amount of
training, particularly new miner training, be done in sessions set
aside for training rather than simply ``on-the-job'' with attendant
exposure to job hazards.
Part 48 training also includes training after assignment to work
duties as well as training in intervals. The training for surface
miners permits the 24 hours of new miner training to be split. Eight
hours can be given to the miner at the mine site immediately before
being assigned work duties, and then 16 hours of training thereafter.
In both underground and surface training, miners can take periods of
annual refresher training (Sec. Sec. 48.3(c)(7) and 48.23(c)(7) and
Sec. Sec. 48.8(e) and 48.28(e)). Additionally, they receive new task
training, as applicable, which may include supervised equipment
operation on-the-job. If operators want to provide additional training,
they are free to do so. The flexible framework of part 48 allows
operators to provide beneficial training beyond what is required.
d. Crediting Prior Training and Experience
One commenter, citing our approach for training under part 46, said
that previous training and experience should be taken into account and
applied toward meeting the requirements for new miner training and
annual refresher training. The commenter indicated that new shaft and
slope construction workers may already have had some task experience
and training, particularly OSHA training, which would remain relevant
to their mining jobs. Another commenter claimed that tunneling is
relevant experience for mining. And another commenter said that past
training from other contractors should be credited.
While we want to avoid undue duplication of training, we are
mindful that a mining environment may present unique circumstances and
hazards. Those aspects of mining are usually best addressed in training
designed specifically for mining. Having instructors approved to teach
mining courses provides a qualitative factor not available in other
training.
On the other hand, there are subjects, such as first aid, that are
more generic in nature and essentially apply in any type of work
environment. We are aware that shaft and slope construction workers
previously may have received some occupational training that is
relevant to mining.
Balancing these considerations, we may grant partial credit in
certain instances. Generic training courses such as first aid will be
credited (this includes qualifications obtained more than a year
before, but which are still current). Other training, particularly from
OSHA and state OSH sources, may be considered for credit upon
application.
We recognize that some jobs are similar whether in a mining or non-
mining environment. We already allow operators to credit pertinent
prior experience for some miners in order to meet the experience
requirements under existing Sec. Sec. 48.5 and 48.25.
Likewise, we will allow shaft and slope construction operators to
credit relevant job experience. Operators should evaluate the
experience as to the similarity of work environment, the hazards
encountered, and the work skills and practices used.
e. Approved Instructors
Consistent with existing part 48, much of the training required by
the final rule must be conducted by MSHA-approved instructors
(Sec. Sec. 48.3(i) and 48.23(i)). A commenter said that it will be
extremely impractical for construction companies to get their own
personnel ``MSHA approved'' as instructors in a timely manner, when
they may only perform one or two jobs at a mine in the entire business
life-cycle. The commenter said that the rule should allow ``competent
persons'' and OSHA instructors to conduct the training. This would
allow for comparable expertise and take into account the realities of
shaft and slope construction work, which often demands the availability
of varying crews at remote locations.
It has been our experience under part 48, however, that mine
operators, including small operators and those working in remote areas,
generally have been able to obtain approved instructors when needed.
Approved instructors have been readily available through three sources:
Operators' staffs, state grantees, and private vendors. Even small mine
operators have become
[[Page 77724]]
approved instructors themselves, available to train employees as
necessary. Some commenters indicated they have staff training
resources.
We have approved thousands of instructors. There are various ways
described in Sec. Sec. 48.3(l) and 48.23(l) of becoming an approved
instructor. Many instructors are approved based on expertise, and that
can include shaft and slope construction. If the demand is there, we
anticipate even more individuals will seek certification as
instructors.
4. Sections 48.8 and 48.28 Annual Refresher Training
We proposed to amend existing paragraph (d) to require all shaft
and slope construction workers employed on the effective date of the
final rule to receive annual refresher training no later than 12 months
from the effective month of the rule. There were no comments on the
proposed provision, and therefore, it remains unchanged in the final
rule.
This will establish an annual refresher training cycle for shaft
and slope construction workers. To maintain this training cycle, shaft
and slope construction operators may complete the annual refresher
training during the last calendar month of the miners' annual refresher
training cycle.
5. Effective Date
Under the proposed rule, the rule would be effective 180 days after
publication except for Sec. Sec. 48.3(o) and 48.23(o). Those sections,
requiring submission of a training plan, would be effective on the date
of publication. We did not receive any comments on the proposed
effective date, and it remains unchanged in the final rule.
III. Executive Order 12866
Executive Order (E.O.) 12866 as amended by E.O. 13258 requires that
regulatory agencies assess both the costs and benefits of intended
regulations. We have fulfilled this requirement for the final rule, and
have determined that the final rule will not have an annual effect of
$100 million or more on the economy. Therefore, it is not an
economically significant regulatory action pursuant to section 3(f)(1)
of E.O. 12866.
The rule will provide shaft and slope construction workers with the
same type of safety and health training afforded other miners. Shaft
and slope construction workers will now receive training for new
miners, training for experienced miners, task training, annual
refresher training, and hazard training, as applicable. The affected
mining sectors and costs and benefits of the final rule are discussed
below. A full discussion of the economic impacts of the final rule is
provided in the Regulatory Economic Analysis which is provided on our
webpage at www.msha.gov, under Rules and Regulations.
Mining Sectors Affected
This final rule extends part 48 training to coal and metal and
nonmetal shaft and slope construction workers who work in underground
mines or at surface areas of underground mines. Based on the second
quarter of 2003 data, the final rule will cover about 690 full-time
equivalent shaft and slope construction workers. Of this total, about
570 (or 83%) are employed by coal contractor firms, while the remaining
120 (or 17%) are employed by metal and nonmetal contractor firms. All
of these contractor firms are large by our standards, employing 20 to
500 people. The final rule covers more shaft and slope construction
workers than the number reported above because the number discussed
above only represents the number of full-time equivalent employees. For
instance, if a contractor hires 4 new shaft and slope miners, and three
quit, the contractor firm would have paid the cost to train all 4 new
hires, although only one remains employed. The one remaining miner is
reported in the number of shaft and slope construction workers.
Hence, the final rule covers both currently employed shaft and
slope construction workers and all the newly hired shaft and slope
construction workers.
Benefits
Safety and health professionals from all sectors of the shaft and
slope construction industry recognize that training is a critical
element of an effective safety and health program. Training informs
miners of safety and health hazards inherent in the workplace and
enables them to identify and avoid such hazards. Training further
teaches miners health and safety principles and safe operating
procedures in performing their work tasks. Training becomes more
important with the influx of new and less experienced miners and mine
operators; longer work hours to meet demands; and increased demand for
contractors who may be less familiar with the dangers on mine property.
There were 15 shaft and slope construction worker fatalities and an
estimated 1,819 NFDL injuries from 1982 to 2005.\1\ This is equivalent
to 0.69 fatalities and 86.64 NFDL injuries annually for shaft and slope
construction workers. We further analyzed the incidence rates of six
shaft and slope construction contractors, five of which represent the
majority of the industry. We used the number of the industry's
fatalities as the basis for determining the industry-wide accident and
injury rates.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ MSHA does not have a separate system identifier for shaft
and slope contractors in its accident database. However, because
MSHA conducts an accident investigation of each mine fatality, we
are able to tabulate the total number of shaft and slope fatalities
from 1982-2005. To estimate the number of NFDL injuries for all
shaft and slope contractors from 1982-2003, we used the ratio of
NFDL injuries to fatalities for the six known shaft and slope
construction companies and multiplied them by the total number of
shaft and slope fatalities from 1982 through August 2003.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
In support of our 1999 part 46 final rule, we estimated the effect
of metal and nonmetal miner training using data on injury and fatality
rates for mines that conducted training versus those that did not. On
average