Self-Regulatory Organizations; National Association of Securities Dealers, Inc.; Notice of Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of Proposed Rule Change To Amend NASD Rule 2111 to Eliminate References to NASD Rule 6440(f)(2), Which Will Be Repealed, 77223-77225 [E5-8064]

Download as PDF Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 249 / Thursday, December 29, 2005 / Notices wwhite on PROD1PC65 with NOTICES Nasdaq also proposes to clarify that an issuer that applies for listing on one tier of Nasdaq, but prior to listing decides to apply to list instead on the other tier, is not required to pay an additional application fee in connection with its revised application. For example, an issuer that submits an application for inclusion of a class of securities in the Nasdaq National Market is required to pay a $5,000 nonrefundable application fee that is submitted with the issuer’s application. If prior to listing the issuer decides to apply to list on the Nasdaq Capital Market instead, the issuer would not be required to pay an additional $5,000 application fee in connection with its revised application. C. Self-Regulatory Organization’s Statement on Comments on the Proposed Rule Change Received From Members, Participants, or Others Nasdaq has neither solicited nor received comments on the proposed rule change. III. Date of Effectiveness of the Proposed Rule Change and Timing for Commission Action Because the foregoing proposed rule change does not: (i) Significantly affect the protection of investors or the public interest; (ii) impose any significant burden on competition; and (iii) become operative for 30 days from the date on which it was filed, or such shorter time as the Commission may designate if consistent with the protection of investors and the public interest, and 2. Statutory Basis Nasdaq provided the Commission with written notice of its intent to file the Nasdaq believes that the proposed proposed rule change, along with a brief rule change is consistent with the provisions of Section 15A of the Act,8 in description and text of the proposed rule change, at least five days prior to general, and with Sections 15A(b)(5) 9 and 15A(b)(6) 10 of the Act, in particular, the filing date,11 the proposed rule change has become effective pursuant to in that it provides for the equitable Section 19(b)(3)(A) of the Act 12 and allocation of reasonable fees, dues, and Rule 19b–4(f)(6) thereunder.13 other charges among members and issuers and other persons using any IV. Solicitation of Comments facility or system which the Nasdaq Interested persons are invited to operates or controls, and is designed to submit written data, views, and remove impediments to and perfect the arguments concerning the foregoing, mechanism of a free and open market including whether the proposed rule and a national market system. Nasdaq change is consistent with the Act. believes the proposed rule change Comments may be submitted by any of provides for an equitable allocation of the following methods: reasonable fees because, although Capital Market issuers that transfer their Electronic Comments • Use the Commission’s Internet listing to the National Market would comment form (https://www.sec.gov/ continue to pay an entry fee for each class of securities listed, such fee would rules/sro.shtml); or • Send an e-mail to rulebe reduced in recognition that these comments@sec.gov. Please include File issuers already paid an entry fee upon Number SR–NASD–2005–143 on the listing on the Capital Market, and that subject line. there is a corresponding reduction in Paper Comments the time and effort necessary to process listing applications of such companies. • Send paper comments in triplicate In addition, the proposed rule change to Jonathan G. Katz, Secretary, should enhance competition among Securities and Exchange Commission, markets by allowing issuers to better 100 F Street, NE., Washington, DC evaluate the benefits of maintaining a 20549–9303. listing on Nasdaq. All submissions should refer to File Number SR–NASD–2005–143. This file B. Self-Regulatory Organization’s number should be included on the Statement on Burden on Competition subject line if e-mail is used. To help the Commission process and review your Nasdaq does not believe that the comments more efficiently, please use proposed rule change will result in any only one method. The Commission will burden on competition that is not post all comments on the Commission’s necessary or appropriate in furtherance Internet Web site (https://www.sec.gov/ of the purposes of the Act, as amended. rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the U.S.C. 78o–3. U.S.C. 78o–3(b)(5). 10 15 U.S.C. 78o–3(b)(6). submission, all subsequent amendments, all written statements with respect to the proposed rule change that are filed with the Commission, and all written communications relating to the proposed rule change between the Commission and any person, other than those that may be withheld from the public in accordance with the provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be available for inspection and copying in the Commission’s Public Reference Room. Copies of the filing also will be available for inspection and copying at the principal office of the NASD. All comments received will be posted without change; the Commission does not edit personal identifying information from submissions. You should submit only information that you wish to make available publicly. All submissions should refer to File Number SR–NASD–2005–143 and should be submitted on or before January 19, 2006. For the Commission, by the Division of Market Regulation, pursuant to delegated authority.14 Jonathan G. Katz, Secretary. [FR Doc. E5–8055 Filed 12–28–05; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 8010–01–P SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION [Release No. 34–52998; File No. SR–NASD– 2005–139] Self-Regulatory Organizations; National Association of Securities Dealers, Inc.; Notice of Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of Proposed Rule Change To Amend NASD Rule 2111 to Eliminate References to NASD Rule 6440(f)(2), Which Will Be Repealed December 22, 2005. Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (‘‘Act’’),1 and Rule 19b–4 thereunder,2 notice is hereby given that on December 1, 2005, the National Association of Securities Dealers, Inc. (‘‘NASD’’) filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (‘‘Commission’’) the proposed rule change as described in Items I, II and III below, which Items have been prepared by the NASD. The NASD filed the proposal as a ‘‘noncontroversial’’ proposed rule change pursuant to Section 19(b)(3)(A) of the 8 15 11 See 14 17 9 15 12 15 1 15 VerDate Aug<31>2005 18:56 Dec 28, 2005 footnote 5, supra. U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A). 13 17 CFR 240.19b–4(f)(6). Jkt 208001 PO 00000 Frm 00106 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 77223 CFR 200.30–3(a)(12). U.S.C. 78s(b)(1). 2 17 CFR 240.19b–4. E:\FR\FM\29DEN1.SGM 29DEN1 77224 Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 249 / Thursday, December 29, 2005 / Notices Act3 and Rule 19b–4(f)(6) thereunder,4 which renders the proposal effective upon filing with the Commission.5 The NASD proposes to implement the proposed rule change on January 9, 2006. The Commission is publishing this notice to solicit comments on the proposed rule change from interested persons. I. Self-Regulatory Organization’s Statement of the Terms of Substance of the Proposed Rule Change The NASD proposes to amend NASD Rule 2111 to delete two references to NASD Rule 6440(f)(2) in light of SR– NASD–2004–045,6 which repealed that rule and will be implemented January 9, 2006. Correspondingly, the NASD will implement the instant proposed rule change on January 9, 2006. The text of the proposed rule change is below. Proposed deletions are in [brackets]. 2111. Trading Ahead of Customer Market Orders This version of the rule does not become effective until January 9, 2006. (a)–(d) No change. (e) This rule applies to limit orders that are marketable at the time they are received by the member or become marketable at a later time. Such limit orders shall be treated as market orders for purposes of this rule, however, these orders must continue to be executed at their limit price or better. If a customer limit order is not marketable when received, the limit order must be provided the full protections of IM– 2110–2 [ or Rule 6440(f)(2), as applicable]. In addition, if the limit order was marketable when received and then becomes non-marketable, once the limit order becomes non-marketable, it must be provided the full protections of IM–2110–2 [or Rule 6440(f)(2), as applicable]. (f)–(g) No change. * * * * * II. Self-Regulatory Organization’s Statement of the Purpose of, and Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change In its filing with the Commission, the NASD included statements concerning the purpose of, and basis for, the proposed rule change and discussed any 3 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A). CFR 240.19b–4(f)(6). 5 As required by Rule 19b–4(f)(6)(iii), 17 CFR 240.19b–4(f)(6)(iii), the NASD submitted written notice of its intent to file the proposed rule change, along with a brief description and text of the proposed rule change, at least five business days prior to the date of filing. 6 See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 52226 (August 9, 2005), 70 FR 48219 (August 16, 2005) (SR–NASD–2004–045). wwhite on PROD1PC65 with NOTICES 4 17 VerDate Aug<31>2005 18:56 Dec 28, 2005 Jkt 208001 comments it received on the proposal. The text of these statements may be examined at the places specified in Item IV below. The NASD has prepared summaries, set forth in Sections A, B, and C below, of the most significant aspects of such statements. A. Self-Regulatory Organization’s Statement of the Purpose of, and Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change 1. Purpose On August 9, 2005, the Commission approved proposed rule change SR– NASD–2004–045 adopting NASD Rule 2111 (‘‘Trading Ahead of Customer Market Orders’’), which will be implemented on January 9, 2006. NASD Rule 2111 prohibits a member from trading for its own account at prices that would satisfy a customer market order in a Nasdaq or exchange-listed security, unless the member immediately thereafter executes the customer market order. In addition, NASD Rule 2111 provides that if a customer limit order is not marketable when received, or if the limit order is marketable when received and then becomes nonmarketable, the limit order must be provided the full protections of IM– 2110–2 (the ‘‘Manning Rule’’) or Rule 6440(f)(2), as applicable.7 On October 24, 2005, the NASD filed SR–NASD–2005–124 seeking to repeal NASD Rule 6440(f) because it overlaps and is generally duplicative of new NASD Rule 2111 and the Manning Rule, as amended.8 SR–NASD–2005–124 was filed for immediate effectiveness and the implementation date is January 9, 2006. In light of the repeal of NASD Rule 6440(f), the references to NASD Rule 6440(f)(2) in NASD Rule 2111 should be deleted. 2. Statutory Basis The NASD believes that the proposed rule change is consistent with the provisions of Section 15A(b)(6) of the Act, which requires, among other things, that NASD rules be designed to prevent fraudulent and manipulative 7 At the time that the NASD filed SR–NASD– 2004–045 in March of 2004, the Manning Rule afforded limit order protection to Nasdaq securities and NASD Rule 6440(f)(2) afforded a similar protection to exchange-listed securities. In August of 2005, the Commission approved SR–NASD– 2004–089, which extended the Manning Rule to exchange-listed securities. See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 52210 (August 4, 2005), 70 FR 46897 (August 11, 2005) (SR–NASD–2004–089). 8 NASD Rule 6440(f) generally prohibits a member from buying (selling) an exchange-listed security for its own account while such member holds an unexecuted market order or unexecuted limit order to buy (sell) such security for a customer. PO 00000 Frm 00107 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 acts and practices, to promote just and equitable principles of trade, and, in general, to protect investors and the public interest. The NASD believes that the proposed rule change will further the goals of improving the treatment of market orders and enhancing the integrity of the market by bringing consistency and clarity to its conduct rules. B. Self-Regulatory Organization’s Statement on Burden on Competition The NASD believes that the proposed rule change will not impose any burden on competition that is not necessary or appropriate in furtherance of the purposes of the Act, as amended. C. Self-Regulatory Organization’s Statement on Comments on the Proposed Rule Change Received From Members, Participants, or Others The NASD has neither solicited nor received comments on the proposed rule change. III. Date of Effectiveness of the Proposed Rule Change and Timing for Commission Action Because the foregoing proposed rule change does not: (i) significantly affect the protection of investors or the public interest; (ii) impose any significant burden on competition; and (iii) become operative for 30 days from the date on which it was filed, or such shorter time as the Commission may designate if consistent with the protection of investors and the public interest, the proposed rule change has become effective pursuant to Section 19(b)(3)(A) of the Act 9 and Rule 19b–4(f)(6) thereunder.10 At any time within 60 days of the filing of such proposed rule change, the Commission may summarily abrogate such rule change if it appears to the Commission that such action is necessary or appropriate in the public interest, for the protection of investors, or otherwise in furtherance of the purposes of the Act.11 IV. Solicitation of Comments Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views, and arguments concerning the foregoing, including whether the proposed rule change is consistent with the Act. Comments may be submitted by any of the following methods: Electronic Comments • Use the Commission’s Internet comment form (https://www.sec.gov/ rules/sro.shtml); or 9 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A). CFR 240.19b–4(f)(6). 11 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(C). 10 17 E:\FR\FM\29DEN1.SGM 29DEN1 Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 249 / Thursday, December 29, 2005 / Notices • Send an e-mail to rulecomments@sec.gov. Please include File Number SR–NASD–2005–139 on the subject line. Paper Comments • Send paper comments in triplicate to Jonathan G. Katz, Secretary, Securities and NASD Commission, 100 F Street, NE., Washington, DC 20549– 9303. All submissions should refer to File Number SR–NASD–2005–139. This file number should be included on the subject line if e-mail is used. To help the Commission process and review your comments more efficiently, please use only one method. The Commission will post all comments on the Commission’s Internet Web site (https://www.sec.gov/ rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the submission, all subsequent amendments, all written statements with respect to the proposed rule change that are filed with the Commission, and all written communications relating to the proposed rule change between the Commission and any person, other than those that may be withheld from the public in accordance with the provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be available for inspection and copying in the Commission’s Public Reference Room. Copies of such filing also will be available for inspection and copying at the principal office of the NASD. All comments received will be posted without change; the Commission does not edit personal identifying information from submissions. You should submit only information that you wish to make available publicly. All submissions should refer to File Number SR–NASD–2005–139 and should be submitted on or before January 19, 2006. For the Commission, by the Division of Market Regulation, pursuant to delegated authority.12 Jonathan G. Katz, Secretary. [FR Doc. E5–8064 Filed 12–28–05; 8:45 am] wwhite on PROD1PC65 with NOTICES BILLING CODE 8010–01–P SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION [Release No. 34–53017; File No. SR–NASD– 2005–150] Self-Regulatory Organizations; National Association of Securities Dealers, Inc.; Notice of Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of Proposed Rule Change To Modify Nasdaq’s Minimum Pricing Increment Rules December 22, 2005. Pursuant to section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (‘‘Act’’) 1 and Rule 19b–4 thereunder,2 notice is hereby given that on December 22, 2005, the National Association of Securities Dealers, Inc. (‘‘NASD’’), through its subsidiary, The Nasdaq Stock Market, Inc. (‘‘Nasdaq’’), filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (‘‘Commission’’) the proposed rule change as described in Items I, II, and III below, which Items have been prepared by Nasdaq. Nasdaq filed this proposal pursuant to section 19(b)(3)(A) of the Act 3 and Rule 19b– 4(f)(6) thereunder,4 therefore making the proposed rule change effective immediately upon filing. Nasdaq intends for this rule change to become operative on January 31, 2006. The Commission is publishing this notice to solicit comments on the proposed rule change from interested persons. I. Self-Regulatory Organization’s Statement of the Terms of the Substance of the Proposed Rule Change Nasdaq proposes to modify NASD Rules 4613, 4701, 4710, 4901, 4904, and 6330 to align Nasdaq’s rules on minimum pricing increments with the corresponding provisions in the Commission’s Regulation NMS. The text of the proposed rule change is below. Proposed new language is in italics; proposed deletions are in brackets. * * * * * 4613. Character of Quotations (a) Quotation Requirements and Obligations (1) Two-Sided Quote Obligation. For each security in which a member is registered as a market maker, the member shall be willing to buy and sell such security for its own account on a continuous basis and shall enter and maintain a two-sided quotation (‘‘Principal Quote’’), which is attributed to the market maker by a special maker participant identifier (‘‘MPID’’) and is displayed in the Nasdaq Quotation Montage 1 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1). CFR 240.19b–4. 3 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A). 4 17 CFR 240.19b–4(f)(6). 2 17 12 17 CFR 200.30–3(a)(12). VerDate Aug<31>2005 18:56 Dec 28, 2005 Jkt 208001 PO 00000 Frm 00108 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 77225 at all times, subject to the procedures for excused withdrawal set forth in Rule 4619. (A) No change (B) Minimum Price Variation [for Decimalbased Quotations]—The minimum quotation increment for Nasdaq National Market and Capital Market securities [authorized for decimal pricing] shall be $0.01 for quotations priced at or above $1.00 per share and $0.0001 for quotations priced below $1.00 per share; provided, however, that if the Securities and Exchange Commission (‘‘SEC’’) permits, with respect to any security, the display, rank or acceptance of quotations priced at or above $1.00 per share in an increment smaller than $0.01, then the minimum quotation increment for such a security shall be the minimum permitted by the SEC or $0.0001, whichever is greater. Quotations failing to meet this standard shall be rejected. (2) and (3) No change (b) through (e) No change * * * 4701. Definitions Unless stated otherwise, the terms described below shall have the following meaning: (a) through (ll) No change (mm) The term ‘‘Pegged’’ shall mean, for priced limit orders so designated, that after entry into the Nasdaq Market Center, the price of the order is automatically adjusted by the Nasdaq Market Center in response to changes in either the Nasdaq Market Center inside bid or offer or the national best bid or offer, as appropriate. A Nasdaq Market Center Participant may enter either a Regular Pegged Order or a Reverse Pegged Order. A Nasdaq Market Center Participant entering a Regular Pegged Order may specify that the price of the order will deviate from either the Nasdaq inside quote on the same side of the market or the national best bid or offer on the same side of the market by an offset amount of $0 to $0.99. A Nasdaq Market Center Participant entering a Reverse Pegged Order may specify that the price of the order will deviate from either the Nasdaq inside quote on the contra side of the market or the national best bid or offer on the contra side of the market by an offset amount of $0.01 to $0.99. The market participant entering a Pegged Order may (but is not required to) specify a cap price, to define a price at which pegging of the order will stop and the order will be permanently converted into an unpegged limit order. Pegged Orders shall not be available for ITS Securities. Pegged orders shall not be eligible for routing as set out in Rule 4714. Offset amounts for Pegged Orders are priced in $0.01 increments. However, if at any time an offset amount specified by a Nasdaq Market Center Participant does not result in an offer or a bid that is fully compliant with the minimum price variation provisions of Rule 4613, then, for an offer, the applicable offset amount will be the smallest amount that results in a compliant order and is greater than the specified offset amount, and, for a bid, the applicable offset amount will be the largest amount that results in a compliant order and is smaller than the specified offset amount. (nn) The term ‘‘Discretionary’’ shall mean, E:\FR\FM\29DEN1.SGM 29DEN1

Agencies

[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 249 (Thursday, December 29, 2005)]
[Notices]
[Pages 77223-77225]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E5-8064]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

[Release No. 34-52998; File No. SR-NASD-2005-139]


Self-Regulatory Organizations; National Association of Securities 
Dealers, Inc.; Notice of Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of Proposed 
Rule Change To Amend NASD Rule 2111 to Eliminate References to NASD 
Rule 6440(f)(2), Which Will Be Repealed

December 22, 2005.
    Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 
(``Act''),\1\ and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,\2\ notice is hereby given that 
on December 1, 2005, the National Association of Securities Dealers, 
Inc. (``NASD'') filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission 
(``Commission'') the proposed rule change as described in Items I, II 
and III below, which Items have been prepared by the NASD. The NASD 
filed the proposal as a ``non-controversial'' proposed rule change 
pursuant to Section 19(b)(3)(A) of the

[[Page 77224]]

Act\3\ and Rule 19b-4(f)(6) thereunder,\4\ which renders the proposal 
effective upon filing with the Commission.\5\ The NASD proposes to 
implement the proposed rule change on January 9, 2006. The Commission 
is publishing this notice to solicit comments on the proposed rule 
change from interested persons.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
    \2\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
    \3\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A).
    \4\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f)(6).
    \5\ As required by Rule 19b-4(f)(6)(iii), 17 CFR 240.19b-
4(f)(6)(iii), the NASD submitted written notice of its intent to 
file the proposed rule change, along with a brief description and 
text of the proposed rule change, at least five business days prior 
to the date of filing.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

I. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Terms of Substance 
of the Proposed Rule Change

    The NASD proposes to amend NASD Rule 2111 to delete two references 
to NASD Rule 6440(f)(2) in light of SR-NASD-2004-045,\6\ which repealed 
that rule and will be implemented January 9, 2006. Correspondingly, the 
NASD will implement the instant proposed rule change on January 9, 
2006. The text of the proposed rule change is below. Proposed deletions 
are in [brackets].
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \6\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 52226 (August 9, 
2005), 70 FR 48219 (August 16, 2005) (SR-NASD-2004-045).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

2111. Trading Ahead of Customer Market Orders

    This version of the rule does not become effective until January 9, 
2006.
    (a)-(d) No change.
    (e) This rule applies to limit orders that are marketable at the 
time they are received by the member or become marketable at a later 
time. Such limit orders shall be treated as market orders for purposes 
of this rule, however, these orders must continue to be executed at 
their limit price or better. If a customer limit order is not 
marketable when received, the limit order must be provided the full 
protections of IM-2110-2 [ or Rule 6440(f)(2), as applicable]. In 
addition, if the limit order was marketable when received and then 
becomes non-marketable, once the limit order becomes non-marketable, it 
must be provided the full protections of IM-2110-2 [or Rule 6440(f)(2), 
as applicable].
    (f)-(g) No change.
* * * * *

II. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and 
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change

    In its filing with the Commission, the NASD included statements 
concerning the purpose of, and basis for, the proposed rule change and 
discussed any comments it received on the proposal. The text of these 
statements may be examined at the places specified in Item IV below. 
The NASD has prepared summaries, set forth in Sections A, B, and C 
below, of the most significant aspects of such statements.

A. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and 
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change

1. Purpose
    On August 9, 2005, the Commission approved proposed rule change SR-
NASD-2004-045 adopting NASD Rule 2111 (``Trading Ahead of Customer 
Market Orders''), which will be implemented on January 9, 2006. NASD 
Rule 2111 prohibits a member from trading for its own account at prices 
that would satisfy a customer market order in a Nasdaq or exchange-
listed security, unless the member immediately thereafter executes the 
customer market order. In addition, NASD Rule 2111 provides that if a 
customer limit order is not marketable when received, or if the limit 
order is marketable when received and then becomes non-marketable, the 
limit order must be provided the full protections of IM-2110-2 (the 
``Manning Rule'') or Rule 6440(f)(2), as applicable.\7\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \7\ At the time that the NASD filed SR-NASD-2004-045 in March of 
2004, the Manning Rule afforded limit order protection to Nasdaq 
securities and NASD Rule 6440(f)(2) afforded a similar protection to 
exchange-listed securities. In August of 2005, the Commission 
approved SR-NASD-2004-089, which extended the Manning Rule to 
exchange-listed securities. See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 
52210 (August 4, 2005), 70 FR 46897 (August 11, 2005) (SR-NASD-2004-
089).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    On October 24, 2005, the NASD filed SR-NASD-2005-124 seeking to 
repeal NASD Rule 6440(f) because it overlaps and is generally 
duplicative of new NASD Rule 2111 and the Manning Rule, as amended.\8\ 
SR-NASD-2005-124 was filed for immediate effectiveness and the 
implementation date is January 9, 2006. In light of the repeal of NASD 
Rule 6440(f), the references to NASD Rule 6440(f)(2) in NASD Rule 2111 
should be deleted.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \8\ NASD Rule 6440(f) generally prohibits a member from buying 
(selling) an exchange-listed security for its own account while such 
member holds an unexecuted market order or unexecuted limit order to 
buy (sell) such security for a customer.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

2. Statutory Basis
    The NASD believes that the proposed rule change is consistent with 
the provisions of Section 15A(b)(6) of the Act, which requires, among 
other things, that NASD rules be designed to prevent fraudulent and 
manipulative acts and practices, to promote just and equitable 
principles of trade, and, in general, to protect investors and the 
public interest. The NASD believes that the proposed rule change will 
further the goals of improving the treatment of market orders and 
enhancing the integrity of the market by bringing consistency and 
clarity to its conduct rules.

B. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Burden on Competition

    The NASD believes that the proposed rule change will not impose any 
burden on competition that is not necessary or appropriate in 
furtherance of the purposes of the Act, as amended.

C. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Comments on the Proposed 
Rule Change Received From Members, Participants, or Others

    The NASD has neither solicited nor received comments on the 
proposed rule change.

III. Date of Effectiveness of the Proposed Rule Change and Timing for 
Commission Action

    Because the foregoing proposed rule change does not: (i) 
significantly affect the protection of investors or the public 
interest; (ii) impose any significant burden on competition; and (iii) 
become operative for 30 days from the date on which it was filed, or 
such shorter time as the Commission may designate if consistent with 
the protection of investors and the public interest, the proposed rule 
change has become effective pursuant to Section 19(b)(3)(A) of the Act 
\9\ and Rule 19b-4(f)(6) thereunder.\10\ At any time within 60 days of 
the filing of such proposed rule change, the Commission may summarily 
abrogate such rule change if it appears to the Commission that such 
action is necessary or appropriate in the public interest, for the 
protection of investors, or otherwise in furtherance of the purposes of 
the Act.\11\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \9\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A).
    \10\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f)(6).
    \11\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(C).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

IV. Solicitation of Comments

    Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views, and 
arguments concerning the foregoing, including whether the proposed rule 
change is consistent with the Act. Comments may be submitted by any of 
the following methods:

Electronic Comments

     Use the Commission's Internet comment form (https://
www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml); or

[[Page 77225]]

     Send an e-mail to rule-comments@sec.gov. Please include 
File Number SR-NASD-2005-139 on the subject line.

Paper Comments

     Send paper comments in triplicate to Jonathan G. Katz, 
Secretary, Securities and NASD Commission, 100 F Street, NE., 
Washington, DC 20549-9303.
    All submissions should refer to File Number SR-NASD-2005-139. This 
file number should be included on the subject line if e-mail is used. 
To help the Commission process and review your comments more 
efficiently, please use only one method. The Commission will post all 
comments on the Commission's Internet Web site (https://www.sec.gov/
rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the submission, all subsequent amendments, 
all written statements with respect to the proposed rule change that 
are filed with the Commission, and all written communications relating 
to the proposed rule change between the Commission and any person, 
other than those that may be withheld from the public in accordance 
with the provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be available for inspection 
and copying in the Commission's Public Reference Room. Copies of such 
filing also will be available for inspection and copying at the 
principal office of the NASD.
    All comments received will be posted without change; the Commission 
does not edit personal identifying information from submissions. You 
should submit only information that you wish to make available 
publicly. All submissions should refer to File Number SR-NASD-2005-139 
and should be submitted on or before January 19, 2006.

    For the Commission, by the Division of Market Regulation, 
pursuant to delegated authority.\12\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \12\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Jonathan G. Katz,
Secretary.
 [FR Doc. E5-8064 Filed 12-28-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8010-01-P
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.