Self-Regulatory Organizations; Boston Stock Exchange, Inc.; Notice of Filing of Proposed Rule Change and Amendment No. 1 Thereto Relating to the Directed Orders Process on the Boston Options Exchange, 77207-77209 [E5-8043]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 249 / Thursday, December 29, 2005 / Notices
proposal to attract additional order flow
largely due to the simplification and
reduction of per share fee rates,
especially in connection with customer
and broker-dealer orders. Therefore, the
Exchange maintains that the proposed
Exchange Traded Funds transaction fee
changes, in the aggregate, are an
equitable allocation of reasonable fees
among Exchange members.
IV. Solicitation of Comments
2. Statutory Basis
• Use the Commission’s Internet
comment form (https://www.sec.gov/
rules/sro.shtml); or
• Send an e-mail to rulecomments@sec.gov. Please include File
Number SR–Amex–2005–122 on the
subject line.
The Exchange believes that the
proposed rule change, as amended, is
consistent with section 6(b) of the Act,12
in general, and furthers the objectives of
section 6(b)(4) of the Act,13 in
particular, in that it is intended to
assure the equitable allocation of
reasonable dues, fees, and other charges
among its members and issuers and
other persons using its facilities.
B. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement on Burden on Competition
The Exchange does not believe that
the proposed rule change, as amended,
will impose any inappropriate burden
on competition not necessary or
appropriate in furtherance of the
purposes of the Act.
C. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement on Comments on the
Proposed Rule Change Received From
Members, Participants, or Others
No written comments were either
solicited or received.
III. Date of Effectiveness of the
Proposed Rule Change and Timing for
Commission Action
The foregoing proposed rule change,
as amended, has been designated as a
fee change pursuant to section
19(b)(3)(A)(ii) of the Act 14 and Rule
19b–4(f)(2) 15 thereunder, because it
establishes or changes a due, fee, or
other charge imposed by the Exchange.
Accordingly, the proposal, as amended,
will take effect upon filing with the
Commission. At any time within 60
days of the filing of such proposed rule
change the Commission may summarily
abrogate such rule change if it appears
to the Commission that such action is
necessary or appropriate in the public
interest, for the protection of investors,
or otherwise in furtherance of the
purposes of the Act.16
U.S.C. 78f(b).
U.S.C. 78f(b)(4).
14 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A)(ii).
15 17 CFR 240.19b–4(f)(2).
16 The effective date of the original proposed rule
change is November 29, 2005, the effective date of
Amendment No. 1 is December 14, 2005, and the
effective date of Amendment No. 2 is December 21,
2005. For purposes of calculating the 60-day period
Interested persons are invited to
submit written data, views, and
arguments concerning the foregoing,
including whether the proposed rule
change, as amended, is consistent with
the Act. Comments may be submitted by
any of the following methods:
Electronic Comments
Paper Comments
• Send paper comments in triplicate
to Jonathan G. Katz, Secretary,
Securities and Exchange Commission,
100 F Street, NE., Washington, DC
20549–9303.
All submissions should refer to File
Number SR–Amex–2005–122. This file
number should be included on the
subject line if e-mail is used. To help the
Commission process and review your
comments more efficiently, please use
only one method. The Commission will
post all comments on the Commission’s
Internet Web site (https://www.sec.gov/
rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the
submission, all subsequent
amendments, all written statements
with respect to the proposed rule
change, as amended, that are filed with
the Commission, and all written
communications relating to the
proposed rule change between the
Commission and any person, other than
those that may be withheld from the
public in accordance with the
provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be
available for inspection and copying in
the Commission’s Public Reference
Room. Copies of such filing also will be
available for inspection and copying at
the principal office of the Amex. All
comments received will be posted
without change; the Commission does
not edit personal identifying
information from submissions. You
should submit only information that
you wish to make available publicly. All
submissions should refer to File
Number SR–Amex–2005–122 and
should be submitted on or before
January 19, 2006.
12 15
wwhite on PROD1PC65 with NOTICES
13 15
VerDate Aug<31>2005
18:56 Dec 28, 2005
Jkt 208001
within which the Commission may summarily
abrogate the proposed rule change, as amended,
under Section 19(b)(3)(C) of the Act, the
Commission considers the period to commence on
December 21, 2005, the date on which the Exchange
submitted Amendment No. 2. See 15 U.S.C.
78s(b)(3)(C).
17 17 CFR 200.30–3(a)(12).
PO 00000
Frm 00090
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
77207
For the Commission, by the Division of
Market Regulation, pursuant to delegated
authority.17
Jonathan G. Katz,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. E5–8059 Filed 12–28–05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8010–01–P
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
COMMISSION
[Release No. 34–53015; File No. SR–BSE–
2005–52]
Self-Regulatory Organizations; Boston
Stock Exchange, Inc.; Notice of Filing
of Proposed Rule Change and
Amendment No. 1 Thereto Relating to
the Directed Orders Process on the
Boston Options Exchange
December 22, 2005.
Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the
‘‘Act’’),1 and Rule 19b–4 thereunder,2
notice is hereby given that on November
25, 2005, the Boston Stock Exchange,
Inc. (‘‘BSE’’ or ‘‘Exchange’’) filed with
the Securities and Exchange
Commission (‘‘Commission’’) the
proposed rule change as described in
Items I, II, and III below, which Items
have been prepared by the BSE. On
December 20, 2005, BSE filed
Amendment No. 1 to the proposed rule
change.3 The Commission is publishing
this notice to solicit comments on the
proposed rule change, as amended, from
interested persons.
I. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Terms of Substance of
the Proposed Rule Change
The Exchange proposes to amend the
rules of the Boston Options Exchange
(‘‘BOX’’) to clarify the information
contained in a ‘‘Directed Order’’ on
BOX. The text of the proposed rule
change is available on the BOX’s Web
site (https://www.bostonoptions.com), at
the principal office of BOX, and at the
Commission’s Public Reference Room.
II. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule
Change
In its filing with the Commission, the
BSE included statements concerning the
purpose of, and basis for, the proposed
rule change and discussed any
comments it received on the proposed
1 15
U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
CFR 240.19b–4.
3 Amendment No. 1 amends the rule text to
include additional language in Chapter V, Section
14(e) of the BOX Rules clarifying that the identities
of Options Participants that send Directed Orders to
the Trading Host are not anonymous.
2 17
E:\FR\FM\29DEN1.SGM
29DEN1
77208
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 249 / Thursday, December 29, 2005 / Notices
rule change. The text of these statements
may be examined at the places specified
in Item IV below. The BSE has prepared
summaries, set forth in Sections A, B,
and C below, of the most significant
aspects of such statements.
wwhite on PROD1PC65 with NOTICES
A. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule
Change
1. Purpose
BSE seeks to clarify the information
contained in a ‘‘Directed Order’’ on
BOX. Market Makers are able to handle
orders on an agency basis directed to
them by Order Flow Providers
(‘‘OFPs’’). In Chapter I, Section 1 of the
BOX Rules, a Directed Order is defined
as a Customer order directed to a Market
Maker by an OFP. An OFP sends a
Directed Order to BOX with a
designation of the Market Maker to
whom the order is to be directed. BOX
then routes the Directed Order to the
appropriate Market Maker. Under
Chapter VI, Section 5(c)(ii) of the BOX
Rules, a Market Maker only has two
choices when he receives a Directed
Order: (1) Submit the order to the PIP
process; or (2) send the order back to
BOX for placement onto the BOX Book.
The BSE proposes to amend Chapter
V, Section 14(e) and Chapter VI, Section
5(c)(i) of the BOX Rules to clarify that
unlike all other orders submitted to the
BOX Trading Host, Directed Orders are
not anonymous.4 The Options
Participant identification number
(‘‘Participant ID’’) of the OFP sending
the Directed Order will be revealed to
the Market Maker recipient. The Market
Maker must submit this Participant ID
to BOX whenever the Market Maker
chooses to submit the Directed Order
and his Primary Improvement Order to
the PIP process. However, once the
Directed Order is submitted to the PIP
process or the BOX Book, the
Participant ID is not shown to any
market participant and the identity of
the OFP will be anonymous pursuant to
Chapter V, Section 14(e) of the BOX
Rules.
Chapter VI, Section 5(c)(i) of the BOX
Rules prohibits a Market Maker from
rejecting a Directed Order. The BSE
wishes to clarify that upon
systematically indicating its desire to
accept Directed Orders, a Market Maker
that receives a Directed Order is not
permitted, under any circumstances, to
reject the receipt of the Directed Order
4 Telephone conversation between Jan Woo,
Attorney, Division of Market Regulation,
Commission, and William C. Meehan, Head of
Regulation & Compliance, BOX, on December 22,
2005.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
18:56 Dec 28, 2005
Jkt 208001
from the BOX Trading Host nor reject
the Directed Order back to the OFP who
sent it. A Market Maker who desires to
accept Directed Orders must
systemically indicate that it is an
Executing Participant (‘‘EP’’) whenever
the Market Maker wishes to receive
Directed Orders from the BOX Trading
Host. If a Market Maker does not
systemically indicate that it is an EP,
then the BOX Trading Host will not
forward any Directed Orders to that
Market Maker. In such a case, the BOX
Trading Host will send the order
directly to the BOX Book.
Other Clarifying Rule Change Relating
to Directed Orders
Currently, Chapter V, Section 14(e) of
the BOX Rules states that the identity of
Options Participants who submit orders
to the Trading Host will remain
anonymous to market participants at all
times, except during error resolution or
through the normal clearing process as
set forth in Chapter V, Section 16(a)(vi)
of the BOX Rules. The BSE proposes to
amend Chapter V, Section 14(e) of the
BOX Rules and add new Supplementary
Material .01 to Chapter V, Section 14(e)
to clarify that the Participant ID of an
OFP who submits orders to the Trading
Host for use in the Directed Order
process will be revealed to the Market
Maker who receives such Directed
Orders as set forth in Chapter VI,
Section 5(c) of the BOX Rules.
2. Statutory Basis
The Exchange believes that the
proposed rule change, as amended, is
designed to clarify the information
contained in a Directed Order. This
clarification will allow Options
Participants to make better informed
decisions in determining when and how
to use the Directed Order process.
Accordingly, the Exchange believes that
the proposal is consistent with the
requirements of Section 6(b) of the Act,5
in general, and Section 6(b)(5) of the
Act,6 in particular, in that it is designed
to foster cooperation and coordination
with persons engaged in regulating,
clearing, settling, processing
information with respect to, and
facilitating transaction in securities, to
remove impediments to and perfect the
mechanism for a free and open market
and a national market system, and, in
general, to protect investors and the
public interest.
5 15
6 15
PO 00000
U.S.C. 78f(b).
U.S.C. 78f(b)(5).
Frm 00091
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
B. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement on Burden on Competition
The Exchange does not believe that
the proposed rule change will impose
any burden on competition not
necessary or appropriate in furtherance
of the purposes of the Act.
C. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement on Comments on the
Proposed Rule Change Received From
Members, Participants or Others
The Exchange has neither solicited
nor received comments on the proposed
rule change.
III. Date of Effectiveness of the
Proposed Rule Change and Timing for
Commission Action
Within 35 days of the date of
publication of this notice in the Federal
Register or within such longer period (i)
as the Commission may designate up to
90 days of such date if it finds such
longer period to be appropriate and
publishes its reasons for so finding or
(ii) as to which BSE consents, the
Commission shall: (a) by order approve
such proposed rule change, or (b)
institute proceedings to determine
whether the proposed rule change
should be disapproved.
IV. Solicitation of Comments
Interested persons are invited to
submit written data, views, and
arguments concerning the foregoing,
including whether the proposed rule
change, as amended, is consistent with
the Act. Comments may be submitted by
any of the following methods:
Electronic Comments
• Use the Commission’s Internet
comment form (https://www.sec.gov/
rules/sro.shtml); or
• Send an e-mail to rulecomments@sec.gov. Please include File
No. SR–BSE–2005–52 on the subject
line.
Paper Comments
• Send paper comments in triplicate
to Jonathan G. Katz, Secretary,
Securities and Exchange Commission,
Station Place, 100 F Street, NE.,
Washington, DC 20549–9303.
All submissions should refer to File
Number SR–BSE–2005–52. This file
number should be included on the
subject line if e-mail is used. To help the
Commission process and review your
comments more efficiently, please use
only one method. The Commission will
post all comments on the Commission’s
Internet Web site (https://www.sec.gov/
rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the
submission, all subsequent
amendments, all written statements
E:\FR\FM\29DEN1.SGM
29DEN1
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 249 / Thursday, December 29, 2005 / Notices
with respect to the proposed rule
change that are filed with the
Commission, and all written
communications relating to the
proposed rule change between the
Commission and any person, other than
those that may be withheld from the
public in accordance with the
provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be
available for inspection and copying in
the Commission’s Public Reference
Room. Copies of such filing also will be
available for inspection and copying at
the principal office of the BOX. All
comments received will be posted
without change; the Commission does
not edit personal identifying
information from submissions. You
should submit only information that
you wish to make available publicly. All
submissions should refer to File
Number SR–BSE–2005–52 and should
be submitted on or before January 19,
2006.
For the Commission, by the Division of
Market Regulation, pursuant to delegated
authority.7
Jonathan G. Katz,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. E5–8043 Filed 12–28–05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8010–01–P
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
COMMISSION
[Release No. 34–53016; File No. SR–CBOE–
2005–107]
Self-Regulatory Organizations;
Chicago Board Options Exchange,
Incorporated; Notice of Filing and
Immediate Effectiveness of a Proposed
Rule Change Relating to its Marketing
Fee Program
December 22, 2005.
wwhite on PROD1PC65 with NOTICES
Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(‘‘Act’’) 1 and Rule 19b–4 thereunder,2
notice is hereby given that on December
9, 2005, the Chicago Board Options
Exchange, Incorporated (‘‘CBOE’’ or
‘‘Exchange’’) filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission
(‘‘Commission’’) the proposed rule
change as described in Items I, II, and
III below, which Items have been
prepared by the Exchange. The CBOE
has designated this proposal as one
establishing or changing a due, fee, or
other charge imposed by the CBOE
under Section 19(b)(3)(A)(ii) of the Act 3
and Rule 19b–4(f)(2) thereunder,4 which
7 17
CFR 200.30–3(a)(12).
U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
2 17 CFR 240.19b–4.
3 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A)(ii).
4 17 CFR 240.19b–4(f)(2).
1 15
VerDate Aug<31>2005
18:56 Dec 28, 2005
Jkt 208001
77209
renders the proposal effective upon
filing with the Commission. The
Commission is publishing this notice to
solicit comments on the proposed rule
change from interested persons.
marketing fee program as described
above will be in effect until June 2,
2006.
Remainder of Fees Schedule—No
change.
I. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Terms of Substance of
the Proposed Rule Change
II. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule
Change
The CBOE proposes to amend its Fees
Schedule and its marketing fee program.
The Exchange states that these changes
to the marketing fee program would be
effective December 12, 2005, and would
continue until June 2, 2006.
Below is the text of the proposed rule
change. Proposed new language is in
italics; proposed deletions are in
[brackets].
Chicago Board Options Exchange, Inc.—
Fees Schedule
[December 1] December 9, 2005
1. No Change.
2. MARKETING FEE (6)(16): $[.22].65
3.–4. No Change.
FOOTNOTES:
(1)–(5) No Change.
(6) Commencing on December 12,
2005, [T]the Marketing Fee will be
assessed only on transactions of MarketMakers, RMMs, e-DPMs, DPMs, and
LMMs resulting from orders for less
than 1,000 contracts (i) from payment
accepting firms, or (ii) that have
designated a ‘‘Preferred Market-Maker’’
under CBOE Rule 8.13 at the rate of
[$.22] $.65 per contract on all classes of
equity options, options on HOLDRs,
options on SPDRs, and options on DIA.
The fee will not apply to Market-Makerto-Market-Maker transactions or
transactions resulting from P/A orders.
This fee shall not apply to index options
and options on ETFs (other than options
on SPDRs and options on DIA). If less
than 80% of the marketing fee funds are
paid out by the DPM/LMM or [LMM]
Preferred Market-Maker in a given
month, then the Exchange would refund
such surplus at the end of the month on
a pro rata basis based upon
contributions made by the MarketMakers, RMMs, e-DPMs, DPMs and
LMMs. However, if 80% or more of the
accumulated funds in a given month are
paid out by the DPM/LMM or [LMM]
Preferred Market-Maker, there will not
be a rebate for that month and the funds
will carry over and will be included in
the pool of funds to be used by the
DPM/LMM or [LMM] Preferred MarketMaker the following month. At the end
of each quarter, the Exchange would
then refund any surplus, if any, on a pro
rata basis based upon contributions
made by the Market-Makers, RMMs,
DPMs, e-DPMs and LMMs. CBOE’s
PO 00000
Frm 00092
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
In its filing with the Commission, the
CBOE included statements concerning
the purpose of and basis for the
proposed rule change, and discussed
any comments it received on the
proposed rule change. The text of these
statements may be examined at the
places specified in Item IV below. The
CBOE has prepared summaries, set forth
in Sections A, B, and C below, of the
most significant aspects of such
statements.
A. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule
Change
1. Purpose
On November 2, 2005, the CBOE
amended its marketing fee program in a
number of respects in light of the recent
adoption of its Preferred Market-Maker
program.5 In particular, the CBOE
amended its marketing fee program to
provide that a Market-Maker will have
access to the marketing fee funds
generated by orders sent to the
Exchange designating that MarketMaker as a ‘‘Preferred Market-Maker.’’
The CBOE now proposes to amend its
marketing fee program, which changes
would be effective December 12, 2005,
and would continue until June 2, 2006
(which is the same date that the CBOE’s
Preferred Market-Maker program is
scheduled to expire, unless extended).6
Current Marketing Fee Program
The current marketing fee is assessed
upon Designated Primary MarketMakers (‘‘DPMs’’), Electronic DPMs (‘‘eDPMs’’), Remote Market-Makers
(‘‘RMMs’’), Lead Market-Makers
(‘‘LMMs’’), and Market-Makers at a rate
5 The Exchange states that, under its Preferred
Market-Maker program, order providers can send an
order to the Exchange designating any CBOE
Market-Maker (including any DPM, e-DPM, LMM,
RMM, and Market-Maker) as a Preferred MarketMaker. If the Preferred Market-Maker is quoting at
the NBBO at the time the order is received on
CBOE, the Preferred Market-Maker is entitled to a
participation entitlement of 50% when there is one
Market-Maker also quoting at the best bid/offer on
the Exchange and 40% when there are two or more
Market-Makers quoting at the best bid/offer on the
Exchange. See Securities Exchange Act Release No.
52506 (September 23, 2005), 70 FR 57340
(September 30, 2005) (SR–CBOE–2005–58).
6 See CBOE Rule 8.13.
E:\FR\FM\29DEN1.SGM
29DEN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 249 (Thursday, December 29, 2005)]
[Notices]
[Pages 77207-77209]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E5-8043]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
[Release No. 34-53015; File No. SR-BSE-2005-52]
Self-Regulatory Organizations; Boston Stock Exchange, Inc.;
Notice of Filing of Proposed Rule Change and Amendment No. 1 Thereto
Relating to the Directed Orders Process on the Boston Options Exchange
December 22, 2005.
Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(the ``Act''),\1\ and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,\2\ notice is hereby given
that on November 25, 2005, the Boston Stock Exchange, Inc. (``BSE'' or
``Exchange'') filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
(``Commission'') the proposed rule change as described in Items I, II,
and III below, which Items have been prepared by the BSE. On December
20, 2005, BSE filed Amendment No. 1 to the proposed rule change.\3\ The
Commission is publishing this notice to solicit comments on the
proposed rule change, as amended, from interested persons.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
\2\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
\3\ Amendment No. 1 amends the rule text to include additional
language in Chapter V, Section 14(e) of the BOX Rules clarifying
that the identities of Options Participants that send Directed
Orders to the Trading Host are not anonymous.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
I. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Terms of Substance
of the Proposed Rule Change
The Exchange proposes to amend the rules of the Boston Options
Exchange (``BOX'') to clarify the information contained in a ``Directed
Order'' on BOX. The text of the proposed rule change is available on
the BOX's Web site (https://www.bostonoptions.com), at the principal
office of BOX, and at the Commission's Public Reference Room.
II. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change
In its filing with the Commission, the BSE included statements
concerning the purpose of, and basis for, the proposed rule change and
discussed any comments it received on the proposed
[[Page 77208]]
rule change. The text of these statements may be examined at the places
specified in Item IV below. The BSE has prepared summaries, set forth
in Sections A, B, and C below, of the most significant aspects of such
statements.
A. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change
1. Purpose
BSE seeks to clarify the information contained in a ``Directed
Order'' on BOX. Market Makers are able to handle orders on an agency
basis directed to them by Order Flow Providers (``OFPs''). In Chapter
I, Section 1 of the BOX Rules, a Directed Order is defined as a
Customer order directed to a Market Maker by an OFP. An OFP sends a
Directed Order to BOX with a designation of the Market Maker to whom
the order is to be directed. BOX then routes the Directed Order to the
appropriate Market Maker. Under Chapter VI, Section 5(c)(ii) of the BOX
Rules, a Market Maker only has two choices when he receives a Directed
Order: (1) Submit the order to the PIP process; or (2) send the order
back to BOX for placement onto the BOX Book.
The BSE proposes to amend Chapter V, Section 14(e) and Chapter VI,
Section 5(c)(i) of the BOX Rules to clarify that unlike all other
orders submitted to the BOX Trading Host, Directed Orders are not
anonymous.\4\ The Options Participant identification number
(``Participant ID'') of the OFP sending the Directed Order will be
revealed to the Market Maker recipient. The Market Maker must submit
this Participant ID to BOX whenever the Market Maker chooses to submit
the Directed Order and his Primary Improvement Order to the PIP
process. However, once the Directed Order is submitted to the PIP
process or the BOX Book, the Participant ID is not shown to any market
participant and the identity of the OFP will be anonymous pursuant to
Chapter V, Section 14(e) of the BOX Rules.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\4\ Telephone conversation between Jan Woo, Attorney, Division
of Market Regulation, Commission, and William C. Meehan, Head of
Regulation & Compliance, BOX, on December 22, 2005.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Chapter VI, Section 5(c)(i) of the BOX Rules prohibits a Market
Maker from rejecting a Directed Order. The BSE wishes to clarify that
upon systematically indicating its desire to accept Directed Orders, a
Market Maker that receives a Directed Order is not permitted, under any
circumstances, to reject the receipt of the Directed Order from the BOX
Trading Host nor reject the Directed Order back to the OFP who sent it.
A Market Maker who desires to accept Directed Orders must systemically
indicate that it is an Executing Participant (``EP'') whenever the
Market Maker wishes to receive Directed Orders from the BOX Trading
Host. If a Market Maker does not systemically indicate that it is an
EP, then the BOX Trading Host will not forward any Directed Orders to
that Market Maker. In such a case, the BOX Trading Host will send the
order directly to the BOX Book.
Other Clarifying Rule Change Relating to Directed Orders
Currently, Chapter V, Section 14(e) of the BOX Rules states that
the identity of Options Participants who submit orders to the Trading
Host will remain anonymous to market participants at all times, except
during error resolution or through the normal clearing process as set
forth in Chapter V, Section 16(a)(vi) of the BOX Rules. The BSE
proposes to amend Chapter V, Section 14(e) of the BOX Rules and add new
Supplementary Material .01 to Chapter V, Section 14(e) to clarify that
the Participant ID of an OFP who submits orders to the Trading Host for
use in the Directed Order process will be revealed to the Market Maker
who receives such Directed Orders as set forth in Chapter VI, Section
5(c) of the BOX Rules.
2. Statutory Basis
The Exchange believes that the proposed rule change, as amended, is
designed to clarify the information contained in a Directed Order. This
clarification will allow Options Participants to make better informed
decisions in determining when and how to use the Directed Order
process. Accordingly, the Exchange believes that the proposal is
consistent with the requirements of Section 6(b) of the Act,\5\ in
general, and Section 6(b)(5) of the Act,\6\ in particular, in that it
is designed to foster cooperation and coordination with persons engaged
in regulating, clearing, settling, processing information with respect
to, and facilitating transaction in securities, to remove impediments
to and perfect the mechanism for a free and open market and a national
market system, and, in general, to protect investors and the public
interest.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\5\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b).
\6\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(5).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
B. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Burden on Competition
The Exchange does not believe that the proposed rule change will
impose any burden on competition not necessary or appropriate in
furtherance of the purposes of the Act.
C. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Comments on the Proposed
Rule Change Received From Members, Participants or Others
The Exchange has neither solicited nor received comments on the
proposed rule change.
III. Date of Effectiveness of the Proposed Rule Change and Timing for
Commission Action
Within 35 days of the date of publication of this notice in the
Federal Register or within such longer period (i) as the Commission may
designate up to 90 days of such date if it finds such longer period to
be appropriate and publishes its reasons for so finding or (ii) as to
which BSE consents, the Commission shall: (a) by order approve such
proposed rule change, or (b) institute proceedings to determine whether
the proposed rule change should be disapproved.
IV. Solicitation of Comments
Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views, and
arguments concerning the foregoing, including whether the proposed rule
change, as amended, is consistent with the Act. Comments may be
submitted by any of the following methods:
Electronic Comments
Use the Commission's Internet comment form (https://
www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml); or
Send an e-mail to rule-comments@sec.gov. Please include
File No. SR-BSE-2005-52 on the subject line.
Paper Comments
Send paper comments in triplicate to Jonathan G. Katz,
Secretary, Securities and Exchange Commission, Station Place, 100 F
Street, NE., Washington, DC 20549-9303.
All submissions should refer to File Number SR-BSE-2005-52. This file
number should be included on the subject line if e-mail is used. To
help the Commission process and review your comments more efficiently,
please use only one method. The Commission will post all comments on
the Commission's Internet Web site (https://www.sec.gov/rules/
sro.shtml). Copies of the submission, all subsequent amendments, all
written statements
[[Page 77209]]
with respect to the proposed rule change that are filed with the
Commission, and all written communications relating to the proposed
rule change between the Commission and any person, other than those
that may be withheld from the public in accordance with the provisions
of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be available for inspection and copying in the
Commission's Public Reference Room. Copies of such filing also will be
available for inspection and copying at the principal office of the
BOX. All comments received will be posted without change; the
Commission does not edit personal identifying information from
submissions. You should submit only information that you wish to make
available publicly. All submissions should refer to File Number SR-BSE-
2005-52 and should be submitted on or before January 19, 2006.
For the Commission, by the Division of Market Regulation,
pursuant to delegated authority.\7\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\7\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Jonathan G. Katz,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. E5-8043 Filed 12-28-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8010-01-P