Notice of Extension of Final Results of the 2003-2004 Antidumping Duty Administrative Review of Certain Cut-to-Length Carbon Steel Plate from Romania, 76764-76765 [E5-7985]
Download as PDF
wwhite on PROD1PC65 with NOTICES
76764
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 248 / Wednesday, December 28, 2005 / Notices
superimposed layers) and of a width of
0.5 inch or greater, or in straight lengths
which, if of a thickness less than 4.75
millimeters, are of a width of 0.5 inch
or greater and which measures at least
10 times the thickness or if of a
thickness of 4.75 millimeters or more
are of a width which exceeds 150
millimeters and measures at least twice
the thickness, as currently classifiable in
the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the
United States (HTSUS) under item
numbers: 7210.30.0030, 7210.30.0060,
7210.41.0000, 7210.49.0030,
7210.49.0090, 7210.61.0000,
7210.69.0000, 7210.70.6030,
7210.70.6060, 7210.70.6090,
7210.90.1000, 7210.90.6000,
7210.90.9000, 7212.20.0000,
7212.30.1030, 7212.30.1090,
7212.30.3000, 7212.30.5000,
7212.40.1000, 7212.40.5000,
7212.50.0000, 7212.60.0000,
7215.90.1000, 7215.90.3000,
7215.90.5000, 7217.20.1500,
7217.30.1530, 7217.30.1560,
7217.90.1000, 7217.90.5030,
7217.90.5060, 7217.90.5090. Included in
these orders are flat–rolled products of
non–rectangular cross-section where
such cross-section is achieved
subsequent to the rolling process (i.e.,
products which have been ‘‘worked
after rolling’’) for example, products
which have been beveled or rounded at
the edges. Excluded from these orders
are flat–rolled steel products either
plated or coated with tin, lead,
chromium, chromium oxides, both tin
and lead (‘‘terne plate’’), or both
chromium and chromium oxides (‘‘tin–
free steel’’), whether or not painted,
varnished or coated with plastics or
other nonmetallic substances in
addition to the metallic coating. Also
excluded from these orders are clad
products in straight lengths of 0.1875
inch or more in composite thickness
and of a width which exceeds 150
millimeters and measures at least twice
the thickness. Also excluded from these
orders are certain clad stainless flat–
rolled products, which are three–
layered corrosion–resistant carbon steel
flat–rolled products less than 4.75
millimeters in composite thickness that
consist of a carbon steel flat–rolled
product clad on both sides with
stainless steel in a 20%-60%-20% ratio.
On September 22, 1999, the
Department issued the final results of a
changed circumstances review partially
revoking the order with respect to
certain corrosion–resistant steel from
Germany.2 This partial revocation
2 See
Final Results of Changed Circumstances
Antidumping Duty and Countervailing Duty
Reviews and Revocation of Orders in Part: Certain
VerDate Aug<31>2005
17:37 Dec 27, 2005
Jkt 208001
applies to certain corrosion–resistant
deep–drawing carbon steel strip, roll–
clad on both sides with aluminum
(AlSi) foils in accordance with St3 LG
as to EN 10139/10140. The
merchandise’s chemical composition
encompasses a core material of U St 23
(continuous casting) in which carbon is
less than 0.08; manganese is less than
0.30; phosphorous is less than 0.20;
sulfur is less than 0.015; aluminum is
less than 0.01; and the cladding material
is a minimum of 99% aluminum with
silicon/copper/iron of less than 1%. The
products are in strips with thicknesses
of 0.07mm to 4.0mm (inclusive) and
widths of 5mm to 800mm (inclusive).
The thickness ratio of aluminum on
either side of steel may range from 3%/
94%/3% to 10%/80%/10%.
The HTSUS item numbers are
provided for convenience and Customs
purposes. The written description
remains dispositive.
Initiation of Changed Circumstances
Reviews
Pursuant to section 751(b)(1) of the
Act, the Department will conduct a
changed circumstances review upon
receipt of information concerning, or a
request from an interested party for a
review of, an AD duty order which
shows changed circumstances sufficient
to warrant a review of the order. As
noted above, on November 7, 2005,
Eutectic requested a ruling from the
Department in accordance with 19 CFR
351.216(b) to exclude the ‘‘wear plate’’
product described above from these AD
orders. Therefore, pursuant to section
751(b)(1) of the Act and 19 CFR
351.216(b), we are initiating changed
circumstances reviews. Although
petitioners and domestic interested
parties have expressed a lack of interest
in the orders with respect to the ‘‘wear
plate’’ product in question, they did not
claim that they represent substantially
all of the production of the domestic
like product, nor has the Department
made such a determination. Therefore,
the Department is not, at this time,
preliminarily revoking the AD orders
with respect to the product in question
pursuant to 19 CFR 351.222(g)(1)(i).
Interested parties are invited to
comment on this initiation, or to
demonstrate that the petitioners and
domestic interested parties account for
substantially all of the production of the
domestic like product.
Corrosion-Resistant Carbon Steel Flat Products from
Germany, 64 FR 51292 (September 22, 1999). The
Department noted that the affirmative statement of
no interest by petitioners, combined with the lack
of comments from interested parties, is sufficient to
warrant partial revocation.
PO 00000
Frm 00030
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Public Comment
Interested parties may submit
comments which the Department will
take into account in the preliminary
results of these reviews. The due date
for filing any such comments is no later
than 15 days after publication of this
notice. Responses to those comments
may be submitted not later than 7 days
following submission of the comments.
All written comments must be
submitted in accordance with 19 CFR
351.303.
The Department will publish in the
Federal Register a notice of preliminary
results of changed circumstances
reviews in accordance with 19 CFR
351.221(b)(4) and 351.221(c)(3)(i),
which will set forth the Department’s
preliminary factual and legal
conclusions. Pursuant to 19 CFR
351.221(b)(4)(ii), interested parties will
have an opportunity to comment on the
preliminary results. The Department
will issue its final results of review in
accordance with the time limits set forth
in 19 CFR 351.216(e).
This notice is published in
accordance with sections 751(b)(1) and
777(i)(1) of the Act and section
351.221(b) of the Department’s
regulations.
Dated: December 21, 2005.
Joseph A. Spetrini,
Acting Assistant Secretary for Import
Administration.
[FR Doc. E5–7983 Filed 12–27–05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–DS–S
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
[A–485–803]
Notice of Extension of Final Results of
the 2003–2004 Antidumping Duty
Administrative Review of Certain Cut–
to-Length Carbon Steel Plate from
Romania
Import Administration,
International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
EFFECTIVE DATE: December 28, 2005.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Patrick Edwards, AD/CVD Operations,
Office 7, Import Administration,
International Trade Administration,
U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th
Street and Constitution Avenue, NW,
Washington DC 20230; telephone: (202)
482–8029.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
AGENCY:
Background
On September 8, 2005, the
Department of Commerce (‘‘the
E:\FR\FM\28DEN1.SGM
28DEN1
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 248 / Wednesday, December 28, 2005 / Notices
Department’’) published the preliminary
results of this administrative review of
certain cut–to-length carbon steel plate
(‘‘cut–to-length plate’’) from Romania.
See Certain Cut–to-Length Carbon Steel
Plate from Romania: Preliminary
Results of Antidumping Duty
Administrative Review and Partial
Rescission, 70 FR 53333 (September 8,
2005) (‘‘Preliminary Results’’). In the
Preliminary Results we stated that we
would make our final determination for
the antidumping duty review no later
than 120 days after the date of
publication of the preliminary results
(i.e., January 6, 2006).
Extension of Time Limit for Final
Results
The Department is extending the time
limit for the final results of the
administrative review of the
antidumping duty order on cut–tolength plate from Romania. This review
covers the period August 1, 2003,
through July 31, 2004.
Section 751(a)(3)(A) of the Tariff Act
of 1930, as amended (‘‘the Act’’), states
that if it is not practicable to complete
the review within the time specified, the
administering authority may extend the
120-day period, following the date of
publication of the preliminary results, to
issue its final results by an additional 60
days. Due to the complexity of issues
raised in this review segment, including
the respondent’s notification of
unreported sales following the
Department’s preliminary results, and
the respondent’s withdrawal of its
business proprietary versions of all
information submitted on the record of
this review, the completion of the final
results within the 120-day period is not
practicable.
Therefore, in accordance with section
751(a)(3)(A) of the Act, the Department
is extending the time period for issuing
the final results of review by an
additional 31 days until no later than
February 6, 2006.
Dated: December 21, 2005.
Stephen J. Claeys,
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Import
Administration.
[FR Doc. E5–7985 Filed 12–27–05; 8:45 am]
wwhite on PROD1PC65 with NOTICES
BILLING CODE 3510–DS–S
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
A–570–831
Fresh Garlic From the People’s
Republic of China; Initiation of New
Shipper Reviews
Import Administration,
International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
EFFECTIVE DATE: December 28, 2005.
SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce
(the ‘‘Department’’) has determined that
requests for new shipper reviews of the
antidumping duty order on fresh garlic
from the People’s Republic of China
(‘‘PRC’’), received in September and
November 2005, meet the statutory and
regulatory requirements for initiation.
The period of review (‘‘POR’’) of these
new shipper reviews is November 1,
2004, through October 31, 2005.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Ryan A. Douglas or Jim Nunno, AD/CVD
Operations, Office 8, Import
Administration, International Trade
Administration, U.S. Department of
Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution
Avenue, NW, Washington, DC 20230;
telephone: (202) 482–1277 and (202)
482–0783, respectively.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
AGENCY:
Background
The notice announcing the
antidumping duty order on fresh garlic
from the PRC was published on
November 16, 1994. See Antidumping
Duty Order: Fresh Garlic From the
People’s Republic of China, 59 FR 59209
(November 16, 1994). The Department
received five timely requests for a new
shipper review in accordance with 19
CFR 351.214(d)(1), dated as follows:
Date
Requester
September 30,
2005 ................
November 2,
2005 ................
17:37 Dec 27, 2005
Qingdao Xintianfeng
Foods Co., Ltd.(‘‘Qingdao
Xintianfeng’’)
November 15,
2005 ................
XuZhou Simple Garlic
Industry Co.,
Ltd.(‘‘XuZhou Simple’’)
November 29,
2005 ................
November 30,
2005 ................
VerDate Aug<31>2005
Qingdao Camel Trading
Co., Ltd.(‘‘Qingdao
Camel’’)
Jkt 208001
PO 00000
Frm 00031
Qingdao Saturn
International Trade Co.,
Ltd.(‘‘Qingdao Saturn’’)
Shandong Longtai Fruits
and Vegetables Co., Ltd.
(‘‘Longtai’’)
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
76765
Qingdao Xintianfeng, XuZhou Simple,
and Longtai certified that they grew and
exported the garlic on which they based
their requests for a new shipper review.
Qingdao Camel certified that Jinxiang
County Lufeng Agricultural Production
Material Co., Ltd. (‘‘Lufeng’’) grew the
subject merchandise it exported.
Qingdao Saturn certified that
Changshan County Taifeng Agricultural
By–Products Processing Co., Ltd.
(‘‘Taifeng’’) grew the subject
merchandise that it exported.
Initiation of New Shipper Reviews
Pursuant to section 751(a)(2)(B)(i)(I) of
the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (‘‘the
Act’’) and 19 CFR 351.214(b)(2),
Qingdao Camel, Qingdao Saturn,
Qingdao Xiantianfeng, Longtai, and
XuZhou Simple certified that they did
not export fresh garlic to the United
States during the period of investigation
(‘‘POI’’). In addition, Lufang and
Taifeng, producers of the subject
merchandise, exported by Qingdao
Camel and Qingdao Saturn,
respectively, provided certifications that
they did not export the subject
merchandise to the United States during
the POI, pursuant to section
751(a)(2)(B)(i)(I) of the Act and 19 CFR
351.214(b)(2)(ii)(B). Pursuant to section
751(a)(2)(B)(i)(II) and 19 CFR
351.214(b)(2)(iii)(A), all companies
discussed above certified that, since the
initiation of the investigation, they have
never been affiliated with any exporter
or grower who exported fresh garlic to
the United States during the POI,
including those not individually
examined during the investigation. As
required by 19 CFR 351.214(b)(2)(iii)(B),
these companies also certified that their
export activities are not controlled by
the central government of the PRC.
In addition to the certifications
described above, each exporter
submitted documentation establishing
the following: (1) the date on which it
first shipped fresh garlic for export to
the United States and the date on which
the fresh garlic was first entered, or
withdrawn from warehouse, for
consumption; (2) the volume of its first
shipment and the volume of subsequent
shipments; and (3) the date of its first
sale to an unaffiliated customer in the
United States.
Pursuant to section 751(a)(2)(B) of the
Act and 19 CFR 351.214(d)(1), we are
initiating five new shipper reviews for
shipments of fresh garlic from the PRC:
(1) grown by Lufeng and exported by
Qingdao Camel,
(2) grown by Taifeng and exported by
Qingdao Saturn,
(3) grown and exported by Qingdao
Xiantianfeng,
E:\FR\FM\28DEN1.SGM
28DEN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 248 (Wednesday, December 28, 2005)]
[Notices]
[Pages 76764-76765]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E5-7985]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
[A-485-803]
Notice of Extension of Final Results of the 2003-2004 Antidumping
Duty Administrative Review of Certain Cut-to-Length Carbon Steel Plate
from Romania
AGENCY: Import Administration, International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
EFFECTIVE DATE: December 28, 2005.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Patrick Edwards, AD/CVD Operations,
Office 7, Import Administration, International Trade Administration,
U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution Avenue, NW,
Washington DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482-8029.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
On September 8, 2005, the Department of Commerce (``the
[[Page 76765]]
Department'') published the preliminary results of this administrative
review of certain cut-to-length carbon steel plate (``cut-to-length
plate'') from Romania. See Certain Cut-to-Length Carbon Steel Plate
from Romania: Preliminary Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative
Review and Partial Rescission, 70 FR 53333 (September 8, 2005)
(``Preliminary Results''). In the Preliminary Results we stated that we
would make our final determination for the antidumping duty review no
later than 120 days after the date of publication of the preliminary
results (i.e., January 6, 2006).
Extension of Time Limit for Final Results
The Department is extending the time limit for the final results of
the administrative review of the antidumping duty order on cut-to-
length plate from Romania. This review covers the period August 1,
2003, through July 31, 2004.
Section 751(a)(3)(A) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (``the
Act''), states that if it is not practicable to complete the review
within the time specified, the administering authority may extend the
120-day period, following the date of publication of the preliminary
results, to issue its final results by an additional 60 days. Due to
the complexity of issues raised in this review segment, including the
respondent's notification of unreported sales following the
Department's preliminary results, and the respondent's withdrawal of
its business proprietary versions of all information submitted on the
record of this review, the completion of the final results within the
120-day period is not practicable.
Therefore, in accordance with section 751(a)(3)(A) of the Act, the
Department is extending the time period for issuing the final results
of review by an additional 31 days until no later than February 6,
2006.
Dated: December 21, 2005.
Stephen J. Claeys,
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Import Administration.
[FR Doc. E5-7985 Filed 12-27-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-S