Maitlen and Benson, Inc. Long Beach, CA; Notice of Termination of Investigation, 75841 [E5-7607]

Download as PDF Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 244 / Wednesday, December 21, 2005 / Notices DEPARTMENT OF LABOR Employment and Training Administration [TA–W–58,241] Maitlen and Benson, Inc. Long Beach, CA; Notice of Termination of Investigation Pursuant to section 221 of the Trade Act of 1974, an investigation was initiated on November 1, 2005 in response to a petition filed by a State agency representative on behalf of workers at Maitlen and Benson, Inc., Long Beach, California (TA–W–58,241). The petitioner has requested that the petition be withdrawn. Consequently, further investigation in this case would serve no purpose, and the investigation has been terminated. Signed in Washington, DC this 6th day of December, 2005. Linda G. Poole, Certifying Officer, Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance. [FR Doc. E5–7607 Filed 12–20–05; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4510–30–P DEPARTMENT OF LABOR Employment and Training Administration erjones on PROD1PC68 with NOTICES Notice of Determinations Regarding Eligibility To Apply for Worker Adjustment Assistance In accordance with section 223 of the Trade Act of 1974, as amended, (19 U.S.C. 2273), the Department of Labor herein presents summaries of determinations regarding eligibility to apply for trade adjustment assistance for workers (TA–W) number and alternative trade adjustment assistance (ATAA) by (TA–W) number issued during the periods of November and December 2005. In order for an affirmative determination to be made and a certification of eligibility to apply for directly-impacted (primary) worker adjustment assistance to be issued, each of the group eligibility requirements of section 222(a) of the Act must be met. I. Section (a)(2)(A) all of the following must be satisfied: A. A significant number or proportion of the workers in such workers’ firm, or an appropriate subdivision of the firm, have become totally or partially separated, or are threatened to become totally or partially separated; B. The sales or production, or both, of such firm or subdivision have decreased absolutely; and VerDate Aug<31>2005 15:25 Dec 20, 2005 Jkt 208001 C. increased imports of articles like or directly competitive with articles produced by such firm or subdivision have contributed importantly to such workers’ separation or threat of separation and to the decline in sales or production of such firm or subdivision; or II. Section (a)(2)(B) both of the following must be satisfied: A. A significant number or proportion of the workers in such workers’ firm, or an appropriate subdivision of the firm, have become totally or partially separated, or are threatened to become totally or partially separated; B. There has been a shift in production by such workers’ firm or subdivision to a foreign county of articles like or directly competitive with articles which are produced by such firm or subdivision; and C. One of the following must be satisfied: 1. The country to which the workers’ firm has shifted production of the articles is a party to a free trade agreement with the United States; 2. The country to which the workers’ firm has shifted production of the articles to a beneficiary country under the Andean Trade Preference Act, African Growth and Opportunity Act, or the Caribbean Basin Economic Recovery Act; or 3. There has been or is likely to be an increase in imports of articles that are like or directly competitive with articles which are or were produced by such firm or subdivision. Also, in order for an affirmative determination to be made and a certification of eligibility to apply for worker adjustment assistance as an adversely affected secondary group to be issued, each of the group eligibility requirements of section 222(b) of the Act must be met. (1) Significant number or proportion of the workers in the workers’ firm or an appropriate subdivision of the firm have become totally or partially separated, or are threatened to become totally or partially separated; (2) The workers’ firm (or subdivision) is a supplier or downstream producer to a firm (or subdivision) that employed a group of workers who received a certification of eligibility to apply for trade adjustment assistance benefits and such supply or production is related to the article that was the basis for such certification; and (3) Either: (A) The workers’ firm is a supplier and the component parts it supplied for the firm (or subdivision) described in paragraph (2) accounted for at least 20 PO 00000 Frm 00062 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 75841 percent of the production or sales of the workers’ firm; or (B) A loss or business by the workers’ firm with the firm (or subdivision) described in paragraph (2) contributed importantly to the workers’ separation or threat of separation. Affirmative Determinations for Worker Adjustment Assistance The following certifications have been issued; the date following the company name and location of each determination references the impact date for all workers of such determination. The following certifications have been issued. The requirements of (a)(2)(A) (increased imports) of section 222 have been met. TA–W–58,002; Mid Continent Nail, Keystone Fasteners, Springdale, AR, September 21, 2004. TA–W–58,073; Motion Control Engineering, Inc., Schindler Elevator Corp., DBA O’Thompson Co., Glendale, NY, October 5, 2004. TA–W–58,143; Gunderson LLC, Portland, OR, October 14, 2004. TA–W–58,152; Native Textiles, Inc., Glens Falls, NY, October 17, 2004. TA–W–58,163; V.C. Originals, Ridgeland, MS, September 20, 2004. TA–W–58,165; Crane Plumbing, L.L.C., Ferguson, KY, October 6, 2004. TA–W–58,167; Galgon Industries, Inc., Building 5, Fremont, CA, October 6, 2004. TA–W–58,178; Bassett Furniture Industries, Inc., Workforce Carolina and Ablest Staffing, Mt. Airy, NC, October 20, 2004. TA–W–58,179; Oakwood Furniture Mfg., Inc., New Tazewell, TN, October 20, 2004. TA–W–58,182; Meridian Beartrack Company, Div. of Meridan Gold Company, Salmon, ID, August 25, 2005. TA–W–58,192; Kim Bo Sewing Co., San Francisco, CA, October 7, 2004. TA–W–58,194; Springs Industries, Inc., Customer Service Center, Lancaster, SC, October 20, 2004. TA–W–58,198; Carpostan Yarn, Inc., Lake View, SC, October 18, 2004. TA–W–58,199; Carpostan Industries, Inc., Lake View, SC, October 18, 2004. TA–W–58,200; Lake View Finishing, Inc., Lake View, SC, October 18, 2004. TA–W–58,206; B and J Knits, Inc., Statesville, NC, October 20, 2004. TA–W–58,212; Wright Products Co., Truth Hardware Division, A Subsidiary of FKI Industries, Rice Lake, WI, February 27, 2005. TA–W–58,215; Bespak, Inc., Apex, NC, October 25, 2004. E:\FR\FM\21DEN1.SGM 21DEN1

Agencies

[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 244 (Wednesday, December 21, 2005)]
[Notices]
[Page 75841]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E5-7607]



[[Page 75841]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR

Employment and Training Administration

[TA-W-58,241]


Maitlen and Benson, Inc. Long Beach, CA; Notice of Termination of 
Investigation

    Pursuant to section 221 of the Trade Act of 1974, an investigation 
was initiated on November 1, 2005 in response to a petition filed by a 
State agency representative on behalf of workers at Maitlen and Benson, 
Inc., Long Beach, California (TA-W-58,241).
    The petitioner has requested that the petition be withdrawn. 
Consequently, further investigation in this case would serve no 
purpose, and the investigation has been terminated.

    Signed in Washington, DC this 6th day of December, 2005.
Linda G. Poole,
Certifying Officer, Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance.
 [FR Doc. E5-7607 Filed 12-20-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510-30-P