Agency Information Collection Activities: Submission for OMB Review; Comment Request, 75483-75484 [E5-7551]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 243 / Tuesday, December 20, 2005 / Notices
Commission’s notice cited above and
the Commission’s Rules of Practice and
Procedure, part 201, subparts A through
E (19 CFR part 201), and part 207,
subparts A and C (19 CFR part 207).
Authority: These investigations are being
conducted under authority of title VII of the
Tariff Act of 1930; this notice is published
pursuant to section 207.21 of the
Commission’s rules.
By order of the Commission.
Issued: December 13, 2005.
Marilyn R. Abbott,
Secretary to the Commission.
[FR Doc. E5–7511 Filed 12–19–05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7020–02–P
INTERNATIONAL TRADE
COMMISSION
[Investigation No. 731–TA–696 (Second
Review)]
Pure Magnesium From China
United States International
Trade Commission.
ACTION: Notice of Commission
determination to conduct a full five-year
review concerning the antidumping
duty order on pure magnesium from
China.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: The Commission hereby gives
notice that it will proceed with a full
review pursuant to section 751(c)(5) of
the Tariff Act of 1930 (19 U.S.C.
1675(c)(5)) to determine whether
revocation of the antidumping duty
order on pure magnesium from China
would be likely to lead to continuation
or recurrence of material injury within
a reasonably foreseeable time. A
schedule for the review will be
established and announced at a later
date. For further information concerning
the conduct of this review and rules of
general application, consult the
Commission’s Rules of Practice and
Procedure, part 201, subparts A through
E (19 CFR part 201), and part 207,
subparts A, D, E, and F (19 CFR part
207).
EFFECTIVE DATE: December 5, 2005.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Mary Messer (202–205–3193), Office of
Investigations, U.S. International Trade
Commission, 500 E Street, SW.,
Washington, DC 20436. Hearingimpaired persons can obtain
information on this matter by contacting
the Commission’s TDD terminal on 202–
205–1810. Persons with mobility
impairments who will need special
assistance in gaining access to the
Commission should contact the Office
of the Secretary at 202–205–2000.
General information concerning the
VerDate Aug<31>2005
19:23 Dec 19, 2005
Jkt 208001
Commission may also be obtained by
accessing its internet server (https://
www.usitc.gov). The public record for
this review may be viewed on the
Commission’s electronic docket (EDIS)
at https://edis.usitc.gov.
On
December 5, 2005, the Commission
determined that it should proceed to a
full review in the subject five-year
review pursuant to section 751(c)(5) of
the Act. The Commission found that the
domestic interested party group
response to its notice of institution (70
FR 52122, September 1, 2005) was
adequate but that the respondent
interested party group response was
inadequate. The Commission also found
that other circumstances warranted
conducting a full review.1 A record of
the Commissioners’ votes, the
Commission’s statement on adequacy,
and any individual Commissioner’s
statements will be available from the
Office of the Secretary and at the
Commission’s Web site.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Authority: This review is being conducted
under authority of title VII of the Tariff Act
of 1930; this notice is published pursuant to
§ 207.62 of the Commission’s rules.
By order of the Commission.
Issued: December 14, 2005.
Marilyn R. Abbott,
Secretary to the Commission.
[FR Doc. E5–7510 Filed 12–19–05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7020–02–P
INTERNATIONAL TRADE
COMMISSION
[Investigation No. 731–TA–1090 (Final)]
Superalloyed Degassed Chromium
From Japan
Determination
On the basis of the record 1 developed
in the subject investigation, the United
States International Trade Commission
(Commission) determines, pursuant to
section 735(b) of the Tariff Act of 1930
(19 U.S.C. 1673d(b)) (the Act), that an
industry in the United States is
materially injured by reason of imports
from Japan of superalloy degassed
chromium, provided for in subheading
8112.21.00 of the Harmonized Tariff
Schedule of the United States, that have
been found by the Department of
Commerce (Commerce) to be sold in the
1 Chairman Stephen Koplan and Commissioner
Jennifer A. Hillman dissenting.
1 The record is defined in sec. 207.2(f) of the
Commission’s Rules of Practice and Procedure (19
CFR § 207.2(f)).
PO 00000
Frm 00039
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
75483
United States at less than fair value
(LTFV).
Background
The Commission instituted this
investigation effective March 4, 2005,
following receipt of a petition filed with
the Commission and Commerce by
Eramet Marietta Inc., Marietta, OH, and
the Paper, Allied-Industrial, Chemical
and Energy Workers International
Union, Local 5–0639, Belpre, OH. The
final phase of the investigation was
scheduled by the Commission following
notification of a preliminary
determination by Commerce that
imports of superalloy degassed
chromium from Japan were being sold at
LTFV within the meaning of section
733(b) of the Act (19 U.S.C. 1673b(b)).
Notice of the scheduling of the final
phase of the Commission’s investigation
and of a public hearing to be held in
connection therewith was given by
posting copies of the notice in the Office
of the Secretary, U.S. International
Trade Commission, Washington, DC,
and by publishing the notice in the
Federal Register of September 7, 2005
(70 FR 53252). The hearing was held in
Washington, DC, on November 3, 2005,
and all persons who requested the
opportunity were permitted to appear in
person or by counsel.
The Commission transmitted its
determination in this investigation to
the Secretary of Commerce on December
15, 2005. The views of the Commission
are contained in USITC Publication
3825 (December 2005), entitled
Superalloy Degassed Chromium from
Japan: Investigation No. 731–TA–1090
(Final).
By order of the Commission.
Issued: December 15, 2005.
Marilyn R. Abbott,
Secretary to the Commission.
[FR Doc. E5–7553 Filed 12–19–05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7020–02–P
NATIONAL ARCHIVES AND RECORDS
ADMINISTRATION
Agency Information Collection
Activities: Submission for OMB
Review; Comment Request
National Archives and Records
Administration (NARA).
ACTION: Notice.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: NARA is giving public notice
that the agency has submitted to OMB
for approval the information collections
described in this notice. The public is
invited to comment on the proposed
information collections pursuant to the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995.
E:\FR\FM\20DEN1.SGM
20DEN1
75484
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 243 / Tuesday, December 20, 2005 / Notices
Written comments must be
submitted to OMB at the address below
on or before January 19, 2006 to be
assured of consideration.
ADDRESSES: Send comments to Desk
Officer for NARA, Office of Management
and Budget, New Executive Office
Building, Washington, DC 20503; fax:
202–395–5167.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Requests for additional information or
copies of the proposed information
collections and supporting statements
should be directed to Tamee Fechhelm
at telephone number 301–837–1694 or
fax number 301–837–3213.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Pursuant
to the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995
(Pub. L. 104–13), NARA invites the
general public and other Federal
agencies to comment on proposed
information collections. NARA
published a notice of proposed
collection for these information
collections on September 29, 2005 (70
FR 56931 and 56932). No comments
were received. NARA has submitted the
described information collections to
OMB for approval.
In response to this notice, comments
and suggestions should address one or
more of the following points: (a)
Whether the proposed information
collections are necessary for the proper
performance of the functions of NARA;
(b) the accuracy of NARA’s estimate of
the burden of the proposed information
collections; (c) ways to enhance the
quality, utility, and clarity of the
information to be collected; and (d)
ways to minimize the burden of the
collection of information on
respondents, including the use of
information technology; and (e) whether
small businesses are affected by this
collection. In this notice, NARA is
soliciting comments concerning the
following information collections:
1. Title: Application for attendance at
the Institute for the Editing of Historical
Documents.
OMB number: 3095–0012.
Agency form number: None.
Type of review: Regular.
Affected public: Individuals, often
already working on documentary
editing projects, who wish to apply to
attend the annual one-week Institute for
the Editing of Historical Documents, an
intensive seminar in all aspects of
modern documentary editing techniques
taught by visiting editors and
specialists.
Estimated number of respondents: 25.
Estimated time per response: 1.5
hours.
Frequency of response: On occasion,
no more than annually (when
DATES:
VerDate Aug<31>2005
19:23 Dec 19, 2005
Jkt 208001
respondent wishes to apply for
attendance at the Institute).
Estimated total annual burden hours:
37.5 hours.
Abstract: The application is used by
the NHPRC staff to establish the
applicant’s qualifications and to permit
selection of those individuals best
qualified to attend the Institute jointly
sponsored by the NHPRC, the
Wisconsin Historical Society, and the
University of Wisconsin. Selected
applicants forms are forwarded to the
resident advisors of the Institute, who
use them to determine what areas of
instruction would be most useful to the
applicants.
You can also use NARA’s Web site at
https://www.archives.gov/nhprc/forms/
editing-application.pdf to review and
fill-in the application.
2. Title: National Historical
Publications and Records Commission
Grant Program.
OMB number: 3095–0013.
Agency form number: None.
Type of review: Regular.
Affected public: Nonprofit
organizations and institutions, state and
local government agencies, Federally
acknowledged or state-recognized
Native American tribes or groups, and
individuals who apply for NHPRC
grants for support of historical
documentary editions, archival
preservation and planning projects, and
other records projects.
Estimated number of respondents:
148 per year submit applications;
approximately 100 grantees among the
applicant respondents also submit
semiannual narrative performance
reports.
Estimated time per response: 54 hours
per application; 2 hours per narrative
report.
Frequency of response: On occasion
for the application; semiannually for the
narrative report. Currently, the NHPRC
considers grant applications 2 times per
year; respondents usually submit no
more than one application per year.
Estimated total annual burden hours:
8,392 hours.
Abstract: The NHPRC is changing the
way it provides information about its
grant program. The previously all
inclusive grant guidelines booklet is
being replaced by a suite of
announcements where the information
will be specific to the grant opportunity
named. The basic information collection
remains the same. The grant proposal is
used by the NHPRC staff, reviewers, and
the Commission to determine if the
applicant and proposed project are
eligible for an NHPRC grant, and
whether the proposed project is
methodologically sound and suitable for
PO 00000
Frm 00040
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
support. The narrative report is used by
the NHPRC staff to monitor the
performance of grants.
You can also use NARA’s Web site at
https://www.archives.gov/nhprc/
guidelines/ to review the
guidelines. The forms used to apply for
a grant can be found at https://
www.archives.gov/nhprc/forms/.
Dated: December 7, 2005.
L. Reynolds Cahoon,
Senior Advisor on Electronic Records.
[FR Doc. E5–7551 Filed 12–19–05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7515–01–P
NUCLEAR REGULATORY
COMMISSION
Documents Containing Reporting or
Recordkeeping Requirements: Office
of Management and Budget (OMB)
Review
U.S. Nuclear Regulatory
Commission (NRC).
ACTION: Notice of the OMB review of
information collection and solicitation
of public comment.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: The NRC has recently
submitted to OMB for review the
following proposal for the collection of
information under the provisions of the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44
U.S.C. Chapter 35).
1. Type of submission, new, revision,
or extension: Revision.
2. The title of the information
collection: 10 CFR part 52, Appendix D,
AP1000 Design Certification, Final Rule.
3. The form number if applicable: Not
applicable.
4. How often the collection is
required: Semi-annually.
5. Who will be required or asked to
report: Applicant for a combined
license.
6. An estimate of the number of
annual responses: 2 (1 response plus 1
recordkeeper).
7. The estimated number of annual
respondents: 1.
8. An estimate of the total number of
hours needed annually to complete the
requirement or request: Approximately
39 additional burden hours (5 hours
reporting plus 34 hours recordkeeping).
9. An indication of whether section
3507(d), Public Law 104–13 applies: It is
applicable.
10. Abstract: The NRC is proposing to
amend its regulations to certify the
AP1000 standard plant design under
subpart B of 10 CFR part 52. This action
is necessary so that applicants or
licensees intending to construct and
operate an AP1000 design may do so by
E:\FR\FM\20DEN1.SGM
20DEN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 243 (Tuesday, December 20, 2005)]
[Notices]
[Pages 75483-75484]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E5-7551]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
NATIONAL ARCHIVES AND RECORDS ADMINISTRATION
Agency Information Collection Activities: Submission for OMB
Review; Comment Request
AGENCY: National Archives and Records Administration (NARA).
ACTION: Notice.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: NARA is giving public notice that the agency has submitted to
OMB for approval the information collections described in this notice.
The public is invited to comment on the proposed information
collections pursuant to the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995.
[[Page 75484]]
DATES: Written comments must be submitted to OMB at the address below
on or before January 19, 2006 to be assured of consideration.
ADDRESSES: Send comments to Desk Officer for NARA, Office of Management
and Budget, New Executive Office Building, Washington, DC 20503; fax:
202-395-5167.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Requests for additional information or
copies of the proposed information collections and supporting
statements should be directed to Tamee Fechhelm at telephone number
301-837-1694 or fax number 301-837-3213.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Pursuant to the Paperwork Reduction Act of
1995 (Pub. L. 104-13), NARA invites the general public and other
Federal agencies to comment on proposed information collections. NARA
published a notice of proposed collection for these information
collections on September 29, 2005 (70 FR 56931 and 56932). No comments
were received. NARA has submitted the described information collections
to OMB for approval.
In response to this notice, comments and suggestions should address
one or more of the following points: (a) Whether the proposed
information collections are necessary for the proper performance of the
functions of NARA; (b) the accuracy of NARA's estimate of the burden of
the proposed information collections; (c) ways to enhance the quality,
utility, and clarity of the information to be collected; and (d) ways
to minimize the burden of the collection of information on respondents,
including the use of information technology; and (e) whether small
businesses are affected by this collection. In this notice, NARA is
soliciting comments concerning the following information collections:
1. Title: Application for attendance at the Institute for the
Editing of Historical Documents.
OMB number: 3095-0012.
Agency form number: None.
Type of review: Regular.
Affected public: Individuals, often already working on documentary
editing projects, who wish to apply to attend the annual one-week
Institute for the Editing of Historical Documents, an intensive seminar
in all aspects of modern documentary editing techniques taught by
visiting editors and specialists.
Estimated number of respondents: 25.
Estimated time per response: 1.5 hours.
Frequency of response: On occasion, no more than annually (when
respondent wishes to apply for attendance at the Institute).
Estimated total annual burden hours: 37.5 hours.
Abstract: The application is used by the NHPRC staff to establish
the applicant's qualifications and to permit selection of those
individuals best qualified to attend the Institute jointly sponsored by
the NHPRC, the Wisconsin Historical Society, and the University of
Wisconsin. Selected applicants forms are forwarded to the resident
advisors of the Institute, who use them to determine what areas of
instruction would be most useful to the applicants.
You can also use NARA's Web site at https://www.archives.gov/nhprc/
forms/editing-application.pdf to review and fill-in the application.
2. Title: National Historical Publications and Records Commission
Grant Program.
OMB number: 3095-0013.
Agency form number: None.
Type of review: Regular.
Affected public: Nonprofit organizations and institutions, state
and local government agencies, Federally acknowledged or state-
recognized Native American tribes or groups, and individuals who apply
for NHPRC grants for support of historical documentary editions,
archival preservation and planning projects, and other records
projects.
Estimated number of respondents: 148 per year submit applications;
approximately 100 grantees among the applicant respondents also submit
semiannual narrative performance reports.
Estimated time per response: 54 hours per application; 2 hours per
narrative report.
Frequency of response: On occasion for the application;
semiannually for the narrative report. Currently, the NHPRC considers
grant applications 2 times per year; respondents usually submit no more
than one application per year.
Estimated total annual burden hours: 8,392 hours.
Abstract: The NHPRC is changing the way it provides information
about its grant program. The previously all inclusive grant guidelines
booklet is being replaced by a suite of announcements where the
information will be specific to the grant opportunity named. The basic
information collection remains the same. The grant proposal is used by
the NHPRC staff, reviewers, and the Commission to determine if the
applicant and proposed project are eligible for an NHPRC grant, and
whether the proposed project is methodologically sound and suitable for
support. The narrative report is used by the NHPRC staff to monitor the
performance of grants.
You can also use NARA's Web site at https://www.archives.gov/nhprc/
guidelines/ to review the guidelines. The forms used to apply
for a grant can be found at https://www.archives.gov/nhprc/forms/.
Dated: December 7, 2005.
L. Reynolds Cahoon,
Senior Advisor on Electronic Records.
[FR Doc. E5-7551 Filed 12-19-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7515-01-P