The Individuals With Disabilities Education Act Paperwork Waiver Demonstration Program, 75161-75165 [E5-7507]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 242 / Monday, December 19, 2005 / Notices
with the evaluator. This coordinator
also will serve as the primary point of
contact for the Office of Special
Education Programs (OSEP) project
officer.
4. Each State receiving approval to
participate in the Multi-Year IEP
Program will be awarded an annual
incentive payment of $10,000 to be used
exclusively to support program-related
evaluation activities, including one trip
to Washington, DC, annually to meet
with the project officer and the
evaluator. Each participating State will
receive an additional incentive payment
of $15,000 annually from the contractor
to support evaluation activities in the
State. Incentive payments may also be
provided to participating districts to
offset the costs of their participation in
the evaluation of the Multi-Year IEP
Program.
Proposed Selection Criteria
We propose that the following
selection criteria be used to evaluate
State proposals submitted under this
program. These particular criteria were
selected because they address the
statutory requirements and proposed
program requirements and permit
applicants to propose a distinctive
approach to addressing these
requirements.
Note: The maximum score for all of these
criteria will be 100 points. We will inform
applicants of the points or weights assigned
to each criterion and sub-criterion in a notice
published in the Federal Register inviting
States to submit applications for this
program.
1. Significance. The Secretary
considers the significance of the
proposed project. In determining the
significance of the proposed project, the
Secretary considers the following
factors:
(a) The extent to which the proposed
project involves the development or
demonstration of promising new
strategies that build on, or are
alternatives to, existing strategies.
(b) The likelihood that the proposed
project will result in improvements in
the IEP process, especially long-term
planning for children with disabilities.
2. Quality of the project design. The
Secretary considers the quality of the
design of the proposed project. In
determining the quality of the design of
the proposed project, the Secretary
considers the following factors:
(a) The extent to which the goals,
objectives, and outcomes to be achieved
by the proposed project are clearly
specified, measurable, and address
active participation in the program
evaluation.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
18:59 Dec 16, 2005
Jkt 208001
(b) The extent to which the design of
the proposed project will improve longterm planning and address the need to
reduce the paperwork burden associated
with IEPs.
(c) The extent to which the proposed
project encourages consumer
involvement, including parental
involvement.
3. Quality of the management plan.
The Secretary considers the quality of
the management plan for the proposed
project. In determining the quality of the
management plan for the proposed
project, the Secretary considers the
following factors:
(a) The adequacy of procedures for
ensuring feedback and continuous
improvement in the operation of the
proposed project.
(b) The extent to which the applicant
has devoted sufficient resources to the
evaluation of the Multi-Year IEP
Program.
(c) How the applicant will ensure that
a diversity of perspectives are brought to
bear in the operation of the proposed
project, including those of parents,
teachers, related services providers,
administrators, or others, as appropriate.
Executive Order 12866
This notice of proposed requirements
and selection criteria has been reviewed
in accordance with Executive Order
12866. Under the terms of the order, we
have assessed the potential costs and
benefits of this regulatory action.
The potential costs associated with
this regulatory action are those resulting
from statutory requirements and those
we have determined as necessary for
administering this program effectively
and efficiently.
In assessing the potential costs and
benefits—both quantitative and
qualitative—of the actions proposed in
this notice, we have determined that the
benefits of the proposed requirements
and selection criteria justify the costs.
We have also determined that this
regulatory action does not unduly
interfere with State, local, and tribal
governments in the exercise of their
governmental functions.
Intergovernmental Review
This program is not subject to
Executive Order 12372 and the
regulations in 34 CFR part 79.
Electronic Access to This Document
You may view this document, as well
as all other Department of Education
documents published in the Federal
Register, in text or Adobe Portable
Document Format (PDF) on the Internet
at the following site: www.ed.gov/news/
fedregister.
PO 00000
Frm 00013
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
75161
To use PDF you must have Adobe
Acrobat Reader, which is available free
at this site. If you have questions about
using PDF, call the U.S. Government
Printing Office (GPO), toll free, at 1–
888–293–6498; or in the Washington,
DC area at (202) 512–1530.
Note: The official version of this document
is the document published in the Federal
Register. Free Internet access to the official
edition of the Federal Register and the Code
of Federal Regulations is available on GPO
Access at: https://www.gpoaccess.gov/nara/
index.html.
Program Authority: 20 U.S.C. 1414.
Dated: December 14, 2005.
John H. Hager,
Assistant Secretary for Special Education and
Rehabilitative Services.
[FR Doc. E5–7506 Filed 12–16–05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4000–01–P
DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION
RIN 1820–ZA42
The Individuals With Disabilities
Education Act Paperwork Waiver
Demonstration Program
Office of Special Education and
Rehabilitative Services, Department of
Education.
ACTION: Notice of proposed
requirements and selection criteria.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: The Assistant Secretary for
Special Education and Rehabilitative
Services proposes requirements and
selection criteria for a competition in
which the Department will select up to
15 States to participate in a pilot
program, the Paperwork Waiver
Demonstration Program (Paperwork
Waiver Program). State proposals
approved under this program would
create opportunities for participating
States to reduce paperwork burdens and
other administrative duties in order to
increase time for instruction and other
activities to improve educational and
functional results for children with
disabilities. The proposed requirements
and selection criteria focus on an
identified national need to reduce the
paperwork burden associated with the
requirements of Part B of the
Individuals with Disabilities Education
Act, as amended, while preserving
students’ civil rights and promoting
academic achievement.
The requirements and selection
criteria proposed in this notice will be
used for a single, one-time-only
competition under this program.
DATES: We must receive your comments
on or before March 6, 2006.
E:\FR\FM\19DEN1.SGM
19DEN1
75162
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 242 / Monday, December 19, 2005 / Notices
Address all comments about
this notice to Troy Justesen, U.S.
Department of Education, 400 Maryland
Avenue, SW., Potomac Center Plaza,
room 5126, Washington, DC 20202–
2641. If you prefer to send your
comments through the Internet, you
may address them to us at the following
address: comments@ed.gov.
You must include the term
‘‘Paperwork Waiver Public Comment’’
in the subject line of your electronic
message. Please submit your comments
only one time, in order to ensure that
we do not receive duplicate copies.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Troy
Justesen. Telephone: 202–245–7468.
If you use a telecommunications
device for the deaf (TDD), you may call
the Federal Relay Service (FRS) at 1–
800–877–8339.
Individuals with disabilities may
obtain this document in an alternative
format (e.g., Braille, large print,
audiotape, or computer diskette) on
request to the contact person listed
under FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
CONTACT.
ADDRESSES:
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Invitation to Comment
We invite you to submit comments
regarding the proposed requirements
and selection criteria. To ensure that
your comments have maximum effect in
developing the notice of final
requirements and selection criteria, we
urge you to identify clearly the specific
proposed requirement or selection
criterion that each comment addresses.
We invite you to assist us in
complying with the specific
requirements of Executive Order 12866
and its overall requirement of reducing
regulatory burden that might result from
the proposed requirements and
selection criteria. Please let us know of
any further opportunities we should
take to reduce potential costs or increase
potential benefits while preserving the
effective and efficient administration of
the program.
During and after the comment period,
you may inspect all public comments
about this notice in room 5126, 550 12th
Street, SW., Washington, DC, between
the hours of 8:30 a.m. and 4 p.m.,
Eastern time, Monday through Friday of
each week except Federal holidays.
Assistance to Individuals With
Disabilities in Reviewing the
Rulemaking Record
On request, we will supply an
appropriate aid, such as a reader or
print magnifier, to an individual with a
disability who needs assistance to
review the comments or other
VerDate Aug<31>2005
18:59 Dec 16, 2005
Jkt 208001
documents in the public rulemaking
record for this notice. If you want to
schedule an appointment for this type of
aid, please contact the person listed
under FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
CONTACT.
Statutory Background of the Paperwork
Waiver Program
On December 3, 2004, President Bush
signed into law Public Law 108–446,
118 Stat. 2647, the Individuals with
Disabilities Education Improvement Act
of 2004, reauthorizing and amending the
Individuals with Disabilities Education
Act (Act). This new law reflects the
importance of strengthening our
Nation’s efforts to ensure every child
with a disability has available a free
appropriate public education (FAPE)
that is (1) of high quality and (2)
designed to achieve the high standards
established in the No Child Left Behind
Act of 2001.
The Paperwork Waiver Program is one
of two demonstration programs
authorized under the new law that is
designed to address parents’, special
educators’ and States’ desire to reduce
excessive and repetitious paperwork,
administrative burden, and noninstructional teacher time and, at the
same time, to increase the resources and
time available for classroom instruction
and other activities focused on
improving educational and functional
results of children with disabilities.
Paperwork burden in special
education affects (1) the time school
staff can devote to instruction or service
provision and (2) retention of staff,
particularly special education teachers.
In 2002, the Office of Special Education
Programs (OSEP) funded a nationally
representative study of teachers’
perceptions of sources of paperwork
burden, the hours devoted to these
activities, and possible explanations for
variations among teachers in the hours
devoted to these tasks. Among the
findings related to the Individualized
Education Program (IEP), student
evaluations, progress reporting, and case
management was that teachers whose
administrative duties and paperwork
exceeded four hours per week were
more likely to perceive these
responsibilities as interfering with their
job of teaching. Moreover, the study
found that the mean number of hours
reported by teachers to be devoted to
these tasks was 6.3 hours per week.
Through the Paperwork Waiver
Program, established under section
609(a) of the Act, the Secretary may
grant waivers of certain statutory and
regulatory requirements under Part B of
the Act to not more than 15 States,
including Puerto Rico, the District of
PO 00000
Frm 00014
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Columbia, and the outlying areas
(States) based on State proposals to
reduce excessive paperwork and noninstructional time burdens that do not
assist in improving educational and
functional results for children with
disabilities. The Secretary is authorized
to grant these waivers for a period of up
to four years.
Although the purpose of the
Paperwork Waiver Program is to reduce
the paperwork burden associated with
the Act, not all statutory and regulatory
requirements under Part B of the Act
may be waived. Specifically, the
Secretary may not waive any statutory
or regulatory provisions relating to
applicable civil rights requirements or
procedural safeguards. Furthermore,
waivers may not affect the right of a
child with a disability to receive FAPE.
In short, State proposals must preserve
the basic rights of students with
disabilities.
Statutory Requirements for Paperwork
Waiver Program
The Act establishes the following
requirements to govern the Paperwork
Waiver Program proposals:
1. States applying for approval under
this program must submit a proposal to
reduce excessive paperwork and noninstructional time burdens that do not
assist in improving educational and
functional results for children with
disabilities.
2. A State submitting a proposal for
the Paperwork Waiver Program must
include in its proposal a list of any
statutory requirements of, or regulatory
requirements relating to, Part B of the
Act that the State desires the Secretary
to waive, in whole or in part (not
including civil rights requirements and
procedural safeguards as noted
elsewhere in this notice); and a list of
any State requirements that the State
proposes to waive or change, in whole
or in part, to carry out the waiver
granted to the State by the Secretary.
Waivers may be granted for a period of
up to four years.
3. The Secretary is prohibited from
waiving any statutory requirements of,
or regulatory requirements relating to
applicable civil rights requirements or
procedural requirements under section
615 of the Act. A waiver may not affect
the right of a child with a disability to
receive FAPE (as defined in section
602(9) of the Act).
4. The Secretary will not grant any
waiver to a State if the Secretary has
determined that the State currently
meets the conditions under section
616(d)(2)(A)(iii) or (iv) of the Act
relative to its implementation of Part B
of the Act.
E:\FR\FM\19DEN1.SGM
19DEN1
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 242 / Monday, December 19, 2005 / Notices
5. The Secretary will terminate a
State’s waiver granted as part of this
program if the Secretary determines that
the State (a) needs assistance under
section 616(d)(2)(A)(ii) of the Act and
that the waiver has contributed to or
caused the need for assistance; (b) needs
intervention under section
616(d)(2)(A)(iii) of the Act or needs
substantial intervention under section
616(d)(2)(A)(iv) of the Act; or (c) fails to
appropriately implement its waiver.
Background for Proposed Requirements
and Selection Criteria
Although the Act sets out the
previously-described situations in
which requirements cannot be waived,
it does not provide specificity as to the
particular requirements that are not
subject to waiver or provide for other
requirements that are necessary for
implementation of this program. For
instance, the Act does not address what
requirements States may propose to
waive without affecting the right of a
child with a disability to receive FAPE.
The Act also does not establish the
selection criteria for the Department to
use to evaluate State proposals. Thus, in
this notice, we are proposing additional
Paperwork Waiver Program
requirements to address these and other
implementation issues and selection
criteria that we will use to evaluate
State proposals.
Under section 609(b) of the Act, the
Department is required to report on the
effectiveness of the waiver program. In
this notice, we are proposing
requirements with which States must
comply that will allow the Department
to evaluate the effectiveness of this
program. To accomplish this, the
Institute of Education Sciences
(Institute) will conduct an evaluation
using a quasi-experimental design that
collects data on the following outcomes:
(a) Educational and functional results
for students with disabilities, (b)
allocation and engagement of
instructional time for students with
disabilities, (c) administrative duties,
paperwork requirements, and resources
by teaching and related services
personnel, (d) quality of special
education services and plans
incorporated in IEPs, and (e) teacher,
parent and administrator satisfaction.
These outcomes will be compared for
students who participate in the
Paperwork Waiver Demonstration
Program, and students who are matched
on disability and prior educational
outcomes who do not participate in the
paperwork waiver program. Specifics of
the design will be confirmed during
discussion with the evaluator, a
technical workgroup, and the
VerDate Aug<31>2005
18:59 Dec 16, 2005
Jkt 208001
participating States during the first
several months of the study.
Participating States will play a crucial
supportive role in this evaluation. They
will, at minimum, assist in developing
the evaluation plan, assure that districts
participating in the Paperwork Waiver
Demonstration Program will collaborate
with the evaluation, provide
background information on relevant
State policies and practices, and supply
data relevant to the outcomes from State
data sources (e.g., student achievement
and functional performance data,
complaint numbers), provide access to
current student IEPs (if appropriate and
paperwork waiver affects an IEP) during
Year 1 of the evaluation, and complete
questionnaires, surveys, and participate
in interviews. Data collection and
analysis will be the responsibility of the
Institute through its contractor. States
can expect to allocate resources for this
purpose at minimum during Year 1 to
assist with planning the details of the
evaluation, ensuring participation of
involved districts, providing access to
relevant State records, and completing
questionnaires or participating in
interviews. Over the course of the
evaluation, participating States will
receive an annual incentive payment
(described in the next section) that will
offset the cost of participating in the
evaluation.
We will announce the final
requirements and selection criteria in a
notice in the Federal Register. We will
determine the final requirements and
selection criteria after considering
responses to this notice and other
information available to the Department.
Note: An application and award for the
Paperwork Waiver Program does not
preclude application and award for the
Multi-Year Individualized Education
Program Demonstration Program, which is
the subject of a separate notice of proposed
requirements and selection criteria.
Note: This notice does not solicit
applications. We will invite applications
through a notice in the Federal Register at a
later date.
Proposed Additional Requirements for
Paperwork Waiver Program
The Secretary proposes the following
additional requirements for the
Paperwork Waiver Program.
1. A State submitting a proposal
under the Paperwork Waiver Program
must include the following material in
its proposal:
(a) A description of how the State
obtained input from school and district
personnel and parents in selecting the
requirements it is proposing for waiver
and a description of any specific
PO 00000
Frm 00015
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
75163
proposals for changing those
requirements to reduce paperwork.
(b) A detailed description of how the
State obtained broad stakeholder input
on the proposal.
(c) A description of the procedures
the State will employ to ensure that, if
the waiver is granted, it will not result
in a denial of the right to FAPE to any
child with a disability.
(d) Assurances that parents will be
given notice of any statutory
requirements that will be waived.
(e) If a State is applying for a waiver
of any paperwork requirements related
to IEPs, assurances that the State will
require that (i) any participating local
educational agency (LEA) obtain
informed consent from the parents
before an IEP that does not meet the
requirements of 614(d) of the Act is
developed for a child; and (ii) before an
LEA requests a parent’s informed
consent, the LEA inform the parent in
writing of (A) Any differences between
the requirements of section 614(d) of the
Act relating to the content,
development, review and revision of
IEPs and the requirements relating to
the content, development, review and
revision of IEPs under the State’s
approved Paperwork Waiver Program
proposal; (B) the parent’s right to revoke
consent to the use of the IEP under the
Paperwork Waiver Program proposal at
any time; and (C) the LEA’s
responsibility to conduct, within 30
calendar days after revocation by the
parent, an IEP meeting to develop an
IEP that meets all the requirements of
section 614(d) of the Act.
(f) Assurances that the State will
cooperate fully, if selected, in a national
evaluation of the Paperwork Waiver
Program. Cooperation includes devoting
a minimum of 4 months between the
award and the implementation of the
State’s waiver to conduct joint planning
with the evaluator. It also includes
participation by the State educational
agency (SEA) in the following
evaluation activities:
(i) For each item in the list of
statutory, regulatory, or State
requirements submitted pursuant to
paragraph 2 in the Statutory
Requirements for Paperwork Waiver
Program section of this notice, ensuring
that the evaluator will have access to the
original and all subsequent new
versions of the associated documents for
each child involved in the evaluation,
together with a general description of
the process for completing each of the
documents. For example, if elements of
the IEP process are waived, the
evaluator shall have access to the most
recent IEP created under previous
guidelines for each participating child,
E:\FR\FM\19DEN1.SGM
19DEN1
75164
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 242 / Monday, December 19, 2005 / Notices
as well as all of the new IEPs created
under the waiver, along with a
description of the process for
completing both types of IEPs.
(ii) Recruiting districts or schools to
participate in the evaluation (as
established in the evaluation design)
and ensuring their continued
cooperation with the evaluation.
Providing a list of districts and schools
that have been recruited and have
agreed to implement the proposed
Paperwork Waiver Program, allow data
collection to occur, and cooperate fully
with the evaluation. For each
participating school or district,
providing basic demographic
information such as student enrollment,
district wealth and ethnicity
breakdowns, the number of children
with disabilities by category, and the
number or type of personnel, as
requested by the evaluator.
(iii) Serving in an advisory capacity to
assist the evaluator in identifying valid
and reliable data sources and improving
the design of data collection
instruments and methods.
(iv) Providing to the evaluator an
inventory of existing State-level data
relevant to the evaluation questions or
consistent with the identified data
sources. Supplying requested State-level
data in accordance with the timeline
specified in the evaluation design.
(v) Providing assistance to the
evaluator with the collection of data
from parents, including obtaining
informed consent, for parent interviews
and responses to surveys and
questionnaires, if necessary to the final
design of the evaluation.
(vi) Designating a coordinator for the
project who will monitor the
implementation of the project and work
with the evaluator. This coordinator
also will serve as the primary point of
contact for the OSEP project officer.
2. For purposes of the statutory
requirement prohibiting the Secretary
from waiving any statutory
requirements of, or regulatory
requirements relating to, but not limited
to, applicable civil rights requirements,
the term applicable civil rights
requirements as used in this notice
includes all civil rights requirements in:
(a) Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act
of 1973, as amended; (b) Title VI of the
Civil Rights Act of 1964; (c) Title IX of
the Education Amendments of 1972; (d)
Title II of the Americans with
Disabilities Act of 1990; and (e) Age
Discrimination Act of 1975 and their
implementing regulations. The term
does not include other requirements
under the Act.
3. Each State receiving approval to
participate in the Paperwork Waiver
VerDate Aug<31>2005
18:59 Dec 16, 2005
Jkt 208001
Program will be awarded an annual
incentive payment of $10,000 to be used
exclusively to support program-related
evaluation activities, including one trip
to Washington, DC, annually to meet
with the project officer and the
evaluator. Each participating State will
receive an additional incentive payment
of $15,000 annually from the evaluation
contractor to support evaluation
activities in the State. Incentive
payments may also be provided to
participating districts to offset the cost
of their participation in the evaluation
of the Paperwork Waiver Demonstration
Program.
Proposed Selection Criteria
We propose that the following
selection criteria be used to evaluate
State proposals submitted under this
program. These particular criteria were
selected because they address the
statutory requirements and proposed
program requirements and permit
applicants to propose a distinctive
approach to addressing these
requirements.
Note: The maximum score for all of these
criteria will be 100 points. We will inform
applicants of the points or weights assigned
to each criterion and sub-criterion in a notice
published in the Federal Register inviting
States to submit applications for this
program.
1. Significance. The Secretary
considers the significance of the
proposed project. In determining the
significance of the proposed project, the
Secretary considers the following
factors:
(a) The extent to which the proposed
project involves the development or
demonstration of promising new
strategies that build on, or are
alternatives to, existing strategies.
(b) The likelihood that the proposed
project will reduce the paperwork
burden and increase instructional time
and improve academic achievement.
2. Quality of the project design. The
Secretary considers the quality of the
design of the proposed project. In
determining the quality of the design of
the proposed project, the Secretary
considers the following factors:
(a) The extent to which the goals,
objectives, and outcomes to be achieved
by the proposed project are clearly
specified, measurable, and address
active participation in the program
evaluation.
(b) The extent to which the design of
the proposed project will successfully
reduce excessive paperwork and
increase instructional time.
(c) The extent to which the proposed
project encourages consumer
PO 00000
Frm 00016
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
involvement, including parental
involvement.
3. Quality of the management plan.
The Secretary considers the quality of
the management plan for the proposed
project. In determining the quality of the
management plan for the proposed
project, the Secretary considers the
following factors:
(a) The adequacy of procedures for
ensuring feedback and continuous
improvement in the operation of the
proposed project.
(b) The extent to which the applicant
has devoted sufficient resources to the
evaluation of the waiver program.
(c) How the applicant will ensure that
a diversity of perspectives are brought to
bear in the operation of the proposed
project, including those of parents,
teachers, related services providers,
school administrators, or others, as
appropriate.
Executive Order 12866
This notice of proposed requirements
and selection criteria has been reviewed
in accordance with Executive Order
12866. Under the terms of the order, we
have assessed the potential costs and
benefits of this regulatory action.
The potential costs associated with
this regulatory action are those resulting
from statutory requirements and those
we have determined as necessary for
administering this program effectively
and efficiently.
In assessing the potential costs and
benefits—both quantitative and
qualitative—of the actions proposed in
this notice, we have determined that the
benefits of the proposed requirements
and selection criteria justify the costs.
We have also determined that this
regulatory action does not unduly
interfere with State, local, and tribal
governments in the exercise of their
governmental functions.
Intergovernmental Review
This program is not subject to
Executive Order 12372 and the
regulations in 34 CFR part 79.
Electronic Access to This Document
You may view this document, as well
as all other Department of Education
documents published in the Federal
Register, in text or Adobe Portable
Document Format (PDF) on the Internet
at the following site: www.ed.gov/news/
fedregister.
To use PDF you must have Adobe
Acrobat Reader, which is available free
at this site. If you have questions about
using PDF, call the U.S. Government
Printing Office (GPO), toll free, at 1–
888–293–6498; or in the Washington,
DC, area at (202) 512–1530.
E:\FR\FM\19DEN1.SGM
19DEN1
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 242 / Monday, December 19, 2005 / Notices
Note: The official version of this document
is the document published in the Federal
Register. Free Internet access to the official
edition of the Federal Register and the Code
of Federal Regulations is available on GPO
Access at: https://www.gpoaccess.gov/nara/
index.html.
Program Authority: 20 U.S.C. 1408.
Dated: December 14, 2005.
John H. Hager,
Assistant Secretary for Special Education and
Rehabilitative Services.
[FR Doc. E5–7507 Filed 12–16–05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4000–01–P
DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
Office of Environmental Management;
Record of Decision for the Idaho HighLevel Waste and Facilities Disposition
Final Environmental Impact Statement
Department of Energy.
Record of Decision.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
SUMMARY: DOE is making decisions
pursuant to the Idaho High-Level Waste
and Facilities Disposition Final
Environmental Impact Statement (Final
EIS) (DOE/EIS–287), issued in October
2002. The Final EIS presents the
analysis of a proposed action containing
two sets of alternatives:
(1) Waste processing alternatives for
treating, storing and disposing of liquid
mixed (radioactive and hazardous)
transuranic (TRU) waste/sodiumbearing waste (SBW) 1 and newlygenerated liquid radioactive waste
(NGLW) stored in below-grade tanks
and solid high-level radioactive waste
(HLW) calcine stored in bin sets at the
Idaho Nuclear Technology and
Engineering Center (INTEC) on the
Idaho National Laboratory (INL) Site,
previously named the Idaho National
Engineering and Environmental
Laboratory (INEEL); and
(2) Facility disposition alternatives for
final disposition of facilities directly
related to the HLW Program at INTEC
after their missions are complete,
including any new facilities necessary
to implement the waste processing
alternatives.
DOE plans a phased decision making
process. DOE considered the
information in the Final EIS, a related
Supplement Analysis (DOE/EIS–0287–
SA–01) (SA), and comments received on
the Federal Register Notice (70 FR
44598; August 3, 2005) that announced
DOE’s preferred treatment technology
for SBW when making the decisions in
1 The Final EIS refers to SBW as mixed
transuranic waste/SBW. However a determination
that SBW is transuranic waste has not been made.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
18:59 Dec 16, 2005
Jkt 208001
this ROD. This first ROD addresses SBW
treatment, facilities disposition,
excluding the INTEC Tank Farm Facility
(Tank Farm) and bin sets closure, and
DOE’s strategy for HLW calcine.
DOE has decided to treat SBW using
the steam reforming technology. The
Department’s preferred disposal path for
this waste is disposal as TRU waste at
the Waste Isolation Pilot Plant (WIPP)
near Carlsbad, New Mexico. Until such
time as the regulatory approvals are
obtained and a determination that the
waste is TRU is made, the Department
will manage the waste to allow disposal
at WIPP or at a geologic repository for
spent nuclear fuel (SNF) and HLW.
For facilities disposition, DOE has
decided to conduct performance-based
closure (to contamination levels below
those that would impact the human
health and the environment as
established by applicable regulations
and DOE Orders as determined on a
case-by-case basis depending on risk) of
existing facilities directly related to the
HLW Program at INTEC once their
missions are complete. Newly
constructed waste processing facilities
needed to implement the decisions in
this ROD, such as the steam reforming
facility for SBW treatment, will be
designed consistent with clean closure
methods and planned to be clean closed
when their missions are complete,
regardless of the classification of the
waste they treat. All INTEC facilities
directly related to the HLW Program
will be closed in accordance with
applicable regulations and DOE Orders.
Further, consistent with DOE’s
Environmental Management
Performance Management Plan for
Accelerating Cleanup at the INEEL (July
2002), DOE’s strategy for HLW calcine is
to retrieve the calcine for disposal
outside the State of Idaho. Accordingly,
DOE will develop calcine retrieval
demonstration processes and conduct
risk-based analyses, including disposal
options, focused on the calcine stored at
the INTEC.
After the Final EIS was issued, the
Ronald W. Reagan National Defense
Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2005
(NDAA), Pub. L. 108–375, was enacted.
Section 3116 of the NDAA provides that
certain waste resulting from
reprocessing of SNF is not high-level
waste if the Secretary of Energy, in
consultation with the Nuclear
Regulatory Commission (NRC), makes
certain determinations. Therefore, DOE
plans to issue an amended ROD in 2006
specifically addressing closure of the
Tank Farm Facility, which stored
certain wastes resulting from
reprocessing, in coordination with the
Secretary of Energy’s determination, in
PO 00000
Frm 00017
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
75165
consultation with the NRC, under
Section 3116.
In a future ROD, DOE will decide the
final strategy for HLW calcine retrieval,
including determining whether and how
to further treat, if applicable, package,
and store calcine pending disposal. DOE
expects to issue the amended ROD for
HLW calcine disposition and bin set
closure in 2009.
The State of Idaho participated as a
cooperating agency in the preparation of
the Idaho High-Level Waste and
Facilities Disposition Environmental
Impact Statement. The State provided
the following input to DOE’s decisions
for waste processing and facility
disposition.
Waste Processing: The State of Idaho
concurs with DOE’s selection of steam
reforming as the technology for
solidifying remaining INTEC Tank Farm
liquids, provided DOE obtains required
permits for its treatment facility and
post-treatment storage, and produces a
waste form acceptable for disposal at a
repository outside Idaho.
Facility Disposition: The State
concurs with the performance-based
closure of existing facilities directly
related to the high-level waste program
at INTEC, once their missions are
complete, subject to the State’s separate
approval of individual closure plans
under the Idaho Hazardous Waste
Management Act and compliance with
section 3116 of the NDAA. The State
also concurs with DOE’s decision to
clean close newly constructed waste
processing facilities.
Remaining Decisions: The State will
provide additional input on DOE’s
remaining decisions for HLW facility
disposition and calcine treatment,
which DOE must make by December 31,
2009, in accordance with our 1995
Settlement Agreement. The State will
continue to coordinate with DOE and
the NRC as appropriate regarding the
classification of tank residuals under
Section 3116 of the NDAA, as well as
the classification of other wastes.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For
further information on the ROD and the
Idaho Cleanup Project, contact Joel
Case, Team Lead, U.S. Department of
Energy, Idaho Operations Office, 1955
Fremont Avenue, MS–1222, Idaho Falls,
ID 83415, Telephone: (208) 526–6795.
For general information on DOE’s
National Environmental Policy Act
(NEPA) process, please contact: Carol
M. Borgstrom, Director, Office of NEPA
Policy and Compliance (EH–42), U.S.
Department of Energy, 1000
Independence Avenue, SW.,
Washington, DC 20585, Telephone:
(202) 586–4600 or leave a message at
(800) 472–2756.
E:\FR\FM\19DEN1.SGM
19DEN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 242 (Monday, December 19, 2005)]
[Notices]
[Pages 75161-75165]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E5-7507]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION
RIN 1820-ZA42
The Individuals With Disabilities Education Act Paperwork Waiver
Demonstration Program
AGENCY: Office of Special Education and Rehabilitative Services,
Department of Education.
ACTION: Notice of proposed requirements and selection criteria.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Assistant Secretary for Special Education and
Rehabilitative Services proposes requirements and selection criteria
for a competition in which the Department will select up to 15 States
to participate in a pilot program, the Paperwork Waiver Demonstration
Program (Paperwork Waiver Program). State proposals approved under this
program would create opportunities for participating States to reduce
paperwork burdens and other administrative duties in order to increase
time for instruction and other activities to improve educational and
functional results for children with disabilities. The proposed
requirements and selection criteria focus on an identified national
need to reduce the paperwork burden associated with the requirements of
Part B of the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act, as amended,
while preserving students' civil rights and promoting academic
achievement.
The requirements and selection criteria proposed in this notice
will be used for a single, one-time-only competition under this
program.
DATES: We must receive your comments on or before March 6, 2006.
[[Page 75162]]
ADDRESSES: Address all comments about this notice to Troy Justesen,
U.S. Department of Education, 400 Maryland Avenue, SW., Potomac Center
Plaza, room 5126, Washington, DC 20202-2641. If you prefer to send your
comments through the Internet, you may address them to us at the
following address: comments@ed.gov.
You must include the term ``Paperwork Waiver Public Comment'' in
the subject line of your electronic message. Please submit your
comments only one time, in order to ensure that we do not receive
duplicate copies.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Troy Justesen. Telephone: 202-245-
7468.
If you use a telecommunications device for the deaf (TDD), you may
call the Federal Relay Service (FRS) at 1-800-877-8339.
Individuals with disabilities may obtain this document in an
alternative format (e.g., Braille, large print, audiotape, or computer
diskette) on request to the contact person listed under FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Invitation to Comment
We invite you to submit comments regarding the proposed
requirements and selection criteria. To ensure that your comments have
maximum effect in developing the notice of final requirements and
selection criteria, we urge you to identify clearly the specific
proposed requirement or selection criterion that each comment
addresses.
We invite you to assist us in complying with the specific
requirements of Executive Order 12866 and its overall requirement of
reducing regulatory burden that might result from the proposed
requirements and selection criteria. Please let us know of any further
opportunities we should take to reduce potential costs or increase
potential benefits while preserving the effective and efficient
administration of the program.
During and after the comment period, you may inspect all public
comments about this notice in room 5126, 550 12th Street, SW.,
Washington, DC, between the hours of 8:30 a.m. and 4 p.m., Eastern
time, Monday through Friday of each week except Federal holidays.
Assistance to Individuals With Disabilities in Reviewing the Rulemaking
Record
On request, we will supply an appropriate aid, such as a reader or
print magnifier, to an individual with a disability who needs
assistance to review the comments or other documents in the public
rulemaking record for this notice. If you want to schedule an
appointment for this type of aid, please contact the person listed
under FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT.
Statutory Background of the Paperwork Waiver Program
On December 3, 2004, President Bush signed into law Public Law 108-
446, 118 Stat. 2647, the Individuals with Disabilities Education
Improvement Act of 2004, reauthorizing and amending the Individuals
with Disabilities Education Act (Act). This new law reflects the
importance of strengthening our Nation's efforts to ensure every child
with a disability has available a free appropriate public education
(FAPE) that is (1) of high quality and (2) designed to achieve the high
standards established in the No Child Left Behind Act of 2001.
The Paperwork Waiver Program is one of two demonstration programs
authorized under the new law that is designed to address parents',
special educators' and States' desire to reduce excessive and
repetitious paperwork, administrative burden, and non-instructional
teacher time and, at the same time, to increase the resources and time
available for classroom instruction and other activities focused on
improving educational and functional results of children with
disabilities.
Paperwork burden in special education affects (1) the time school
staff can devote to instruction or service provision and (2) retention
of staff, particularly special education teachers. In 2002, the Office
of Special Education Programs (OSEP) funded a nationally representative
study of teachers' perceptions of sources of paperwork burden, the
hours devoted to these activities, and possible explanations for
variations among teachers in the hours devoted to these tasks. Among
the findings related to the Individualized Education Program (IEP),
student evaluations, progress reporting, and case management was that
teachers whose administrative duties and paperwork exceeded four hours
per week were more likely to perceive these responsibilities as
interfering with their job of teaching. Moreover, the study found that
the mean number of hours reported by teachers to be devoted to these
tasks was 6.3 hours per week.
Through the Paperwork Waiver Program, established under section
609(a) of the Act, the Secretary may grant waivers of certain statutory
and regulatory requirements under Part B of the Act to not more than 15
States, including Puerto Rico, the District of Columbia, and the
outlying areas (States) based on State proposals to reduce excessive
paperwork and non-instructional time burdens that do not assist in
improving educational and functional results for children with
disabilities. The Secretary is authorized to grant these waivers for a
period of up to four years.
Although the purpose of the Paperwork Waiver Program is to reduce
the paperwork burden associated with the Act, not all statutory and
regulatory requirements under Part B of the Act may be waived.
Specifically, the Secretary may not waive any statutory or regulatory
provisions relating to applicable civil rights requirements or
procedural safeguards. Furthermore, waivers may not affect the right of
a child with a disability to receive FAPE. In short, State proposals
must preserve the basic rights of students with disabilities.
Statutory Requirements for Paperwork Waiver Program
The Act establishes the following requirements to govern the
Paperwork Waiver Program proposals:
1. States applying for approval under this program must submit a
proposal to reduce excessive paperwork and non-instructional time
burdens that do not assist in improving educational and functional
results for children with disabilities.
2. A State submitting a proposal for the Paperwork Waiver Program
must include in its proposal a list of any statutory requirements of,
or regulatory requirements relating to, Part B of the Act that the
State desires the Secretary to waive, in whole or in part (not
including civil rights requirements and procedural safeguards as noted
elsewhere in this notice); and a list of any State requirements that
the State proposes to waive or change, in whole or in part, to carry
out the waiver granted to the State by the Secretary. Waivers may be
granted for a period of up to four years.
3. The Secretary is prohibited from waiving any statutory
requirements of, or regulatory requirements relating to applicable
civil rights requirements or procedural requirements under section 615
of the Act. A waiver may not affect the right of a child with a
disability to receive FAPE (as defined in section 602(9) of the Act).
4. The Secretary will not grant any waiver to a State if the
Secretary has determined that the State currently meets the conditions
under section 616(d)(2)(A)(iii) or (iv) of the Act relative to its
implementation of Part B of the Act.
[[Page 75163]]
5. The Secretary will terminate a State's waiver granted as part of
this program if the Secretary determines that the State (a) needs
assistance under section 616(d)(2)(A)(ii) of the Act and that the
waiver has contributed to or caused the need for assistance; (b) needs
intervention under section 616(d)(2)(A)(iii) of the Act or needs
substantial intervention under section 616(d)(2)(A)(iv) of the Act; or
(c) fails to appropriately implement its waiver.
Background for Proposed Requirements and Selection Criteria
Although the Act sets out the previously-described situations in
which requirements cannot be waived, it does not provide specificity as
to the particular requirements that are not subject to waiver or
provide for other requirements that are necessary for implementation of
this program. For instance, the Act does not address what requirements
States may propose to waive without affecting the right of a child with
a disability to receive FAPE. The Act also does not establish the
selection criteria for the Department to use to evaluate State
proposals. Thus, in this notice, we are proposing additional Paperwork
Waiver Program requirements to address these and other implementation
issues and selection criteria that we will use to evaluate State
proposals.
Under section 609(b) of the Act, the Department is required to
report on the effectiveness of the waiver program. In this notice, we
are proposing requirements with which States must comply that will
allow the Department to evaluate the effectiveness of this program. To
accomplish this, the Institute of Education Sciences (Institute) will
conduct an evaluation using a quasi-experimental design that collects
data on the following outcomes: (a) Educational and functional results
for students with disabilities, (b) allocation and engagement of
instructional time for students with disabilities, (c) administrative
duties, paperwork requirements, and resources by teaching and related
services personnel, (d) quality of special education services and plans
incorporated in IEPs, and (e) teacher, parent and administrator
satisfaction. These outcomes will be compared for students who
participate in the Paperwork Waiver Demonstration Program, and students
who are matched on disability and prior educational outcomes who do not
participate in the paperwork waiver program. Specifics of the design
will be confirmed during discussion with the evaluator, a technical
workgroup, and the participating States during the first several months
of the study.
Participating States will play a crucial supportive role in this
evaluation. They will, at minimum, assist in developing the evaluation
plan, assure that districts participating in the Paperwork Waiver
Demonstration Program will collaborate with the evaluation, provide
background information on relevant State policies and practices, and
supply data relevant to the outcomes from State data sources (e.g.,
student achievement and functional performance data, complaint
numbers), provide access to current student IEPs (if appropriate and
paperwork waiver affects an IEP) during Year 1 of the evaluation, and
complete questionnaires, surveys, and participate in interviews. Data
collection and analysis will be the responsibility of the Institute
through its contractor. States can expect to allocate resources for
this purpose at minimum during Year 1 to assist with planning the
details of the evaluation, ensuring participation of involved
districts, providing access to relevant State records, and completing
questionnaires or participating in interviews. Over the course of the
evaluation, participating States will receive an annual incentive
payment (described in the next section) that will offset the cost of
participating in the evaluation.
We will announce the final requirements and selection criteria in a
notice in the Federal Register. We will determine the final
requirements and selection criteria after considering responses to this
notice and other information available to the Department.
Note: An application and award for the Paperwork Waiver Program
does not preclude application and award for the Multi-Year
Individualized Education Program Demonstration Program, which is the
subject of a separate notice of proposed requirements and selection
criteria.
Note: This notice does not solicit applications. We will invite
applications through a notice in the Federal Register at a later
date.
Proposed Additional Requirements for Paperwork Waiver Program
The Secretary proposes the following additional requirements for
the Paperwork Waiver Program.
1. A State submitting a proposal under the Paperwork Waiver Program
must include the following material in its proposal:
(a) A description of how the State obtained input from school and
district personnel and parents in selecting the requirements it is
proposing for waiver and a description of any specific proposals for
changing those requirements to reduce paperwork.
(b) A detailed description of how the State obtained broad
stakeholder input on the proposal.
(c) A description of the procedures the State will employ to ensure
that, if the waiver is granted, it will not result in a denial of the
right to FAPE to any child with a disability.
(d) Assurances that parents will be given notice of any statutory
requirements that will be waived.
(e) If a State is applying for a waiver of any paperwork
requirements related to IEPs, assurances that the State will require
that (i) any participating local educational agency (LEA) obtain
informed consent from the parents before an IEP that does not meet the
requirements of 614(d) of the Act is developed for a child; and (ii)
before an LEA requests a parent's informed consent, the LEA inform the
parent in writing of (A) Any differences between the requirements of
section 614(d) of the Act relating to the content, development, review
and revision of IEPs and the requirements relating to the content,
development, review and revision of IEPs under the State's approved
Paperwork Waiver Program proposal; (B) the parent's right to revoke
consent to the use of the IEP under the Paperwork Waiver Program
proposal at any time; and (C) the LEA's responsibility to conduct,
within 30 calendar days after revocation by the parent, an IEP meeting
to develop an IEP that meets all the requirements of section 614(d) of
the Act.
(f) Assurances that the State will cooperate fully, if selected, in
a national evaluation of the Paperwork Waiver Program. Cooperation
includes devoting a minimum of 4 months between the award and the
implementation of the State's waiver to conduct joint planning with the
evaluator. It also includes participation by the State educational
agency (SEA) in the following evaluation activities:
(i) For each item in the list of statutory, regulatory, or State
requirements submitted pursuant to paragraph 2 in the Statutory
Requirements for Paperwork Waiver Program section of this notice,
ensuring that the evaluator will have access to the original and all
subsequent new versions of the associated documents for each child
involved in the evaluation, together with a general description of the
process for completing each of the documents. For example, if elements
of the IEP process are waived, the evaluator shall have access to the
most recent IEP created under previous guidelines for each
participating child,
[[Page 75164]]
as well as all of the new IEPs created under the waiver, along with a
description of the process for completing both types of IEPs.
(ii) Recruiting districts or schools to participate in the
evaluation (as established in the evaluation design) and ensuring their
continued cooperation with the evaluation. Providing a list of
districts and schools that have been recruited and have agreed to
implement the proposed Paperwork Waiver Program, allow data collection
to occur, and cooperate fully with the evaluation. For each
participating school or district, providing basic demographic
information such as student enrollment, district wealth and ethnicity
breakdowns, the number of children with disabilities by category, and
the number or type of personnel, as requested by the evaluator.
(iii) Serving in an advisory capacity to assist the evaluator in
identifying valid and reliable data sources and improving the design of
data collection instruments and methods.
(iv) Providing to the evaluator an inventory of existing State-
level data relevant to the evaluation questions or consistent with the
identified data sources. Supplying requested State-level data in
accordance with the timeline specified in the evaluation design.
(v) Providing assistance to the evaluator with the collection of
data from parents, including obtaining informed consent, for parent
interviews and responses to surveys and questionnaires, if necessary to
the final design of the evaluation.
(vi) Designating a coordinator for the project who will monitor the
implementation of the project and work with the evaluator. This
coordinator also will serve as the primary point of contact for the
OSEP project officer.
2. For purposes of the statutory requirement prohibiting the
Secretary from waiving any statutory requirements of, or regulatory
requirements relating to, but not limited to, applicable civil rights
requirements, the term applicable civil rights requirements as used in
this notice includes all civil rights requirements in: (a) Section 504
of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended; (b) Title VI of the
Civil Rights Act of 1964; (c) Title IX of the Education Amendments of
1972; (d) Title II of the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990; and
(e) Age Discrimination Act of 1975 and their implementing regulations.
The term does not include other requirements under the Act.
3. Each State receiving approval to participate in the Paperwork
Waiver Program will be awarded an annual incentive payment of $10,000
to be used exclusively to support program-related evaluation
activities, including one trip to Washington, DC, annually to meet with
the project officer and the evaluator. Each participating State will
receive an additional incentive payment of $15,000 annually from the
evaluation contractor to support evaluation activities in the State.
Incentive payments may also be provided to participating districts to
offset the cost of their participation in the evaluation of the
Paperwork Waiver Demonstration Program.
Proposed Selection Criteria
We propose that the following selection criteria be used to
evaluate State proposals submitted under this program. These particular
criteria were selected because they address the statutory requirements
and proposed program requirements and permit applicants to propose a
distinctive approach to addressing these requirements.
Note: The maximum score for all of these criteria will be 100
points. We will inform applicants of the points or weights assigned
to each criterion and sub-criterion in a notice published in the
Federal Register inviting States to submit applications for this
program.
1. Significance. The Secretary considers the significance of the
proposed project. In determining the significance of the proposed
project, the Secretary considers the following factors:
(a) The extent to which the proposed project involves the
development or demonstration of promising new strategies that build on,
or are alternatives to, existing strategies.
(b) The likelihood that the proposed project will reduce the
paperwork burden and increase instructional time and improve academic
achievement.
2. Quality of the project design. The Secretary considers the
quality of the design of the proposed project. In determining the
quality of the design of the proposed project, the Secretary considers
the following factors:
(a) The extent to which the goals, objectives, and outcomes to be
achieved by the proposed project are clearly specified, measurable, and
address active participation in the program evaluation.
(b) The extent to which the design of the proposed project will
successfully reduce excessive paperwork and increase instructional
time.
(c) The extent to which the proposed project encourages consumer
involvement, including parental involvement.
3. Quality of the management plan. The Secretary considers the
quality of the management plan for the proposed project. In determining
the quality of the management plan for the proposed project, the
Secretary considers the following factors:
(a) The adequacy of procedures for ensuring feedback and continuous
improvement in the operation of the proposed project.
(b) The extent to which the applicant has devoted sufficient
resources to the evaluation of the waiver program.
(c) How the applicant will ensure that a diversity of perspectives
are brought to bear in the operation of the proposed project, including
those of parents, teachers, related services providers, school
administrators, or others, as appropriate.
Executive Order 12866
This notice of proposed requirements and selection criteria has
been reviewed in accordance with Executive Order 12866. Under the terms
of the order, we have assessed the potential costs and benefits of this
regulatory action.
The potential costs associated with this regulatory action are
those resulting from statutory requirements and those we have
determined as necessary for administering this program effectively and
efficiently.
In assessing the potential costs and benefits--both quantitative
and qualitative--of the actions proposed in this notice, we have
determined that the benefits of the proposed requirements and selection
criteria justify the costs.
We have also determined that this regulatory action does not unduly
interfere with State, local, and tribal governments in the exercise of
their governmental functions.
Intergovernmental Review
This program is not subject to Executive Order 12372 and the
regulations in 34 CFR part 79.
Electronic Access to This Document
You may view this document, as well as all other Department of
Education documents published in the Federal Register, in text or Adobe
Portable Document Format (PDF) on the Internet at the following site:
www.ed.gov/news/fedregister.
To use PDF you must have Adobe Acrobat Reader, which is available
free at this site. If you have questions about using PDF, call the U.S.
Government Printing Office (GPO), toll free, at 1-888-293-6498; or in
the Washington, DC, area at (202) 512-1530.
[[Page 75165]]
Note: The official version of this document is the document
published in the Federal Register. Free Internet access to the
official edition of the Federal Register and the Code of Federal
Regulations is available on GPO Access at: https://www.gpoaccess.gov/
nara/.
Program Authority: 20 U.S.C. 1408.
Dated: December 14, 2005.
John H. Hager,
Assistant Secretary for Special Education and Rehabilitative Services.
[FR Doc. E5-7507 Filed 12-16-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4000-01-P