Joy Technologies, Inc., DBA Joy Mining Machinery, Mt. Vernon Plant, Mt. Vernon, IL; Notice of Affirmative Determination Regarding Application for Reconsideration, 74373 [E5-7379]
Download as PDF
<![CDATA[
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 240 / Thursday, December 15, 2005 / Notices
Signed at Washington, DC, this 7th day of
December 2005.
Linda G. Poole,
Certifying Officer, Division of Trade
Adjustment Assistance.
[FR Doc. E5–7375 Filed 12–14–05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510–30–P
DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
Employment and Training
Administration
[TA–W–57,700]
Joy Technologies, Inc., DBA Joy
Mining Machinery, Mt. Vernon Plant,
Mt. Vernon, IL; Notice of Affirmative
Determination Regarding Application
for Reconsideration
By application of November 3, 2005,
a petitioner requested administrative
reconsideration of the Department of
Labor’s Notice of Negative
Determination Regarding Eligibility to
Apply for Worker Adjustment
Assistance, applicable to workers of the
subject firm. The Notice of
determination was signed on September
15, 2005, and published in the Federal
Register on October 31, 2005 (70 FR
62345).
The negative determination was based
on no shift of underground mining
machinery production abroad and no
increased imports of underground
mining machinery during the relevant
period. Workers produced underground
mining machinery and are not
separately identifiable by product line.
The Department carefully reviewed
the workers’ request for reconsideration
and has determined that the Department
will conduct further investigation based
on new information provided by the
petitioners.
Conclusion
After careful review of the
application, I conclude that the claim is
of sufficient weight to justify
reconsideration of the Department of
Labor’s prior decision. The application
is, therefore, granted.
Signed at Washington, DC, this 16th day of
November 2005.
Elliott S. Kushner,
Certifying Officer, Division of Trade
Adjustment Assistance.
[FR Doc. E5–7379 Filed 12–14–05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510–30–P
VerDate Aug<31>2005
17:24 Dec 14, 2005
Jkt 208001
NATIONAL CRIME PREVENTION AND
PRIVACY COMPACT COUNCIL
Security and Management Control
Outsourcing Standard
National Crime Prevention and
Privacy Compact Council.
ACTION: Notice.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: Pursuant to the publication
requirement in title 42, United States
Code (U.S.C.), section 14616, Article
VI(e), the Compact Council (Council),
established by the National Crime
Prevention and Privacy Compact
(Compact) Act of 1998, is providing
public notice of the attached combined
Security and Management Control
Outsourcing Standard (Outsourcing
Standard) established by the Council.
DATES: This Outsourcing Standard is
effective on December 15, 2005.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Todd C. Commodore, FBI CJIS Division,
1000 Custer Hollow Road, Module C3,
Clarksburg, WV 26306; Telephone (304)
625–2803; e-mail tcommodo@leo.gov;
fax number (304) 625–5388.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background
The Compact, 42 U.S.C., section
14616, establishes uniform standards
and processes for the interstate and
Federal-State exchange of criminal
history records for noncriminal justice
purposes. The Compact was approved
by the Congress on October 9, 1998,
(Pub. L. 105–251) and became effective
on April 28, 1999, when ratified by the
second state. Article VI of the Compact
provides for a Council that has the
authority to promulgate rules and
procedures governing the use of the
Interstate Identification Index (III)
System for noncriminal justice
purposes. The III is the system of federal
and state criminal history records
maintained by the Federal Bureau of
Investigation (FBI). On December 16,
2004, the Council published in the
Federal Register, 69 FR 75243, an
interim final rule entitled ‘‘Outsourcing
of Noncriminal Justice Administrative
Functions.’’ Published elsewhere in
today’s edition of the Federal Register,
the interim final rule (codified at title
28, Code of Federal Regulations, part
906) is adopted as a final rule without
change.
On December 16, 2004, the Council
published in the Federal Register, 69 FR
75350, a notice with request for
comments. The notice provided two
Security and Management Control
Outsourcing Standards (Outsourcing
Standards). The first Outsourcing
Standard (‘‘Security and Management
PO 00000
Frm 00085
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
74373
Control Outsourcing Standard for
Contractors Having Access to CHRI on
Behalf of an Authorized Recipient for
Noncriminal Justice Purposes’’) was to
be used by Contractors authorized to
perform noncriminal justice
administrative functions requiring
access to CHRI without a direct
connection to the FBI’s CJIS Wide Area
Network (WAN). The second
Outsourcing Standard (‘‘Security and
Management Control Outsourcing
Standard for Channelers Only’’) was to
be used by Contractors authorized
access to CHRI through a direct
connection to the FBI’s CJIS WAN. At
the May 2005 Council meeting, the
Council approved a motion to
consolidate the two Outsourcing
Standards because they were so similar.
Accordingly, the combined Outsourcing
Standard is printed below. Hereafter,
prior to utilizing the Outsourcing
Standard, interested parties should
request the most current version by
contacting the Compact Council Office,
1000 Custer Hollow Road, Module C3,
Clarksburg, WV 26306, Attention: FBI
Compact Officer.
II. Discussion of Comments on the
Notice
The 60-day comment period for the
notice closed on February 14, 2005.
Twelve comments were received from
three different sources.
All comments referenced particular
sections of the notice. The first
comment concerned the definition of
‘‘dissemination’’ as provided in section
1.12. The entity submitting the
comment believed the definition was
referring to ‘‘authorized dissemination’’
and it stated that the definition could be
used interchangeably within the
Outsourcing Standard to refer to both
‘‘authorized’’ and ‘‘unauthorized’’
dissemination. Based on previous
discussion at the Council’s Standards
Committee meetings, the Council
decided to leave the original definition
of dissemination intact.
The second comment addressed
footnote 2 of section 2.01, which
outlines audit requirements by the
Compact Officer/Chief Administrator of
the Contractor and Authorized
Recipients. As the footnote was
previously written, all Authorized
Recipients and Contractors were to be
audited within one year of the signing
of the contract. The potential exists for
outsourcing by thousands of Authorized
Recipients. FBI and state audit resources
are limited and it is not feasible to audit
all potential Authorized Recipients and
Contractors. However, auditing a
representative sample is feasible.
Accordingly, the Council agreed to
E:\FR\FM\15DEN1.SGM
15DEN1
]]>Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 240 (Thursday, December 15, 2005)]
[Notices]
[Page 74373]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E5-7379]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
Employment and Training Administration
[TA-W-57,700]
Joy Technologies, Inc., DBA Joy Mining Machinery, Mt. Vernon
Plant, Mt. Vernon, IL; Notice of Affirmative Determination Regarding
Application for Reconsideration
By application of November 3, 2005, a petitioner requested
administrative reconsideration of the Department of Labor's Notice of
Negative Determination Regarding Eligibility to Apply for Worker
Adjustment Assistance, applicable to workers of the subject firm. The
Notice of determination was signed on September 15, 2005, and published
in the Federal Register on October 31, 2005 (70 FR 62345).
The negative determination was based on no shift of underground
mining machinery production abroad and no increased imports of
underground mining machinery during the relevant period. Workers
produced underground mining machinery and are not separately
identifiable by product line.
The Department carefully reviewed the workers' request for
reconsideration and has determined that the Department will conduct
further investigation based on new information provided by the
petitioners.
Conclusion
After careful review of the application, I conclude that the claim
is of sufficient weight to justify reconsideration of the Department of
Labor's prior decision. The application is, therefore, granted.
Signed at Washington, DC, this 16th day of November 2005.
Elliott S. Kushner,
Certifying Officer, Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance.
[FR Doc. E5-7379 Filed 12-14-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510-30-P
