Self-Regulatory Organizations; Notice of Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of Proposed Rule Change by the Pacific Exchange, Inc. and Amendment No. 1 Thereto Relating to the Approval of Securities That Underlie Options Traded on the Exchange, 74078-74080 [E5-7328]
Download as PDF
74078
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 239 / Wednesday, December 14, 2005 / Notices
existing rule of the self-regulatory
organization. PCX will announce the
implementation date in a Rule Adoption
Notice to be published no later than 7
days after Notice of this filing.
At any time within 60 days of the
filing of the proposed rule change, the
Commission may summarily abrogate
such rule change if it appears to the
Commission that such action is
necessary or appropriate in the public
interest, for the protection of investors,
or otherwise in furtherance of the
purposes of the Act.13
IV. Solicitation of Comments
Interested persons are invited to
submit written data, views, and
arguments concerning the foregoing,
including whether the proposed rule
change, as amended, is consistent with
the Act. Comments may be submitted by
any of the following methods:
Electronic Comments
• Use the Commission’s Internet
comment form (https://www.sec.gov/
rules/sro.shtml); or
• Send an e-mail to rulecomments@sec.gov. Please include File
Number SR–PCX–2005–113 on the
subject line.
Paper Comments
• Send paper comments in triplicate
to Jonathan G. Katz, Secretary,
Securities and Exchange Commission,
100 F Street, NE., Washington, DC
20549–9303.
All submissions should refer to File
Number SR-PCX–2005–113. This file
number should be included on the
subject line if e-mail is used. To help the
Commission process and review your
comments more efficiently, please use
only one method. The Commission will
post all comments on the Commission’s
Internet Web site (https://www.sec.gov/
rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the
submission, all subsequent
amendments, all written statements
with respect to the proposed rule
change that are filed with the
Commission, and all written
communications relating to the
proposed rule change between the
Commission and any person, other than
those that may be withheld from the
public in accordance with the
provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be
13 The effective date of the original proposed rule
is November 17, 2005. The effective date of
Amendment No. 1 is November 22, 2005. For
purposes of calculating the 60-day period within
which the Commission may summarily abrogate the
proposed rule change under Section 19(b)(3)(C) of
the Act, the Commission considers the period to
commence on November 22, 2005, the date on
which PCX submitted Amendment No. 1. See 15
U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(C).
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:29 Dec 13, 2005
Jkt 208001
available for inspection and copying in
the Commission’s Public Reference
Room. Copies of such filing also will be
available for inspection and copying at
the principal office of the PCX. All
comments received will be posted
without change; the Commission does
not edit personal identifying
information from submissions. You
should submit only information that
you wish to make available publicly. All
submissions should refer to File
Number SR–PCX–2005–113 and should
be submitted on or before January 4,
2006.
For the Commission, by the Division of
Market Regulation, pursuant to delegated
authority.14
Jonathan G. Katz,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. E5–7325 Filed 12–13–05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8010–01–P
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
COMMISSION
[Release No. 34–52911; File No. SR–PCX–
2005–129]
Self-Regulatory Organizations; Notice
of Filing and Immediate Effectiveness
of Proposed Rule Change by the
Pacific Exchange, Inc. and Amendment
No. 1 Thereto Relating to the Approval
of Securities That Underlie Options
Traded on the Exchange
December 7, 2005.
Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(‘‘Act’’) 1 and Rule 19b–4 thereunder,2
notice is hereby given that on November
23, 2005, the Pacific Exchange, Inc.
(‘‘PCX’’ or ‘‘Exchange’’) filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission
(‘‘Commission’’) the proposed rule
change as described in Items I and II
below, which Items have been prepared
by the self-regulatory organization. On
December 7, 2005, PCX filed
Amendment No. 1 to the proposed rule
change.3 PCX filed the proposed rule
change pursuant to Section 19(b)(3)(A)
of the Act,4 and Rule 19b–4(f)(6)
thereunder,5 which renders the
proposal, as amended, effective upon
filing with the Commission. The
Commission is publishing this notice to
solicit comments on the proposed rule
14 17
CFR 200.30–3(a)(12).
U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
2 17 CFR 240.19b–4.
3 See Form 19b–4 dated December 7, 2005 which
replaced the original filing in its entirety
(‘‘Amendment No. 1’’). Amendment No. 1 made
clarifying changes and corrected typographical
errors in the original filing.
4 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A).
5 17 CFR 240.19b–4(f)(6).
1 15
PO 00000
Frm 00091
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
change, as amended, from interested
persons.
I. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Terms of Substance of
the Proposed Rule Change
The Exchange proposes changes to
PCX rules pertaining to the approval of
securities that underlie options traded
on the Exchange. Specifically, the
Exchange proposes to eliminate Rule
5.6(b)(5) and amend Rule 5.6(b)(6) and
Rule 5.3(b). A copy of the proposed rule
change is available on the PCX Web site,
(www.pacificex.com), at the PCX’s
Office of the Secretary and at the
Commission’s Public Reference Room.
II. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule
Change
In its filing with the Commission, the
self-regulatory organization included
statements concerning the purpose of
and basis for the proposed rule change
and discussed any comments it received
on the proposed rule change. The text
of these statements may be examined at
the places specified in Item IV below.
The self-regulatory organization has
prepared summaries, set forth in
sections A, B and C below, of the most
significant aspects of such statements.
A. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule
Change
1. Purpose
The purpose of this Amendment No.
1 is to make clarifying changes and
correct typographical errors in the
original filing. This Amendment No. 1
replaces the original rule filing in its
entirety. The Exchange proposes
changes to PCX rules pertaining to the
approval of securities that underlie
options traded on the Exchange.
Specifically, the Exchange proposes to
eliminate Rule 5.6(b)(5) and amend Rule
5.6(b)(6) and Rule 5.3(b).
PCX Rule 5.6(b) sets forth various
situations under which an underlying
security previously approved for
options trading will in usual
circumstances be deemed to no longer
meet Exchange requirements for the
continuance of such approval. In such
circumstances, Rule 5.6(b)(5) provides
that the Exchange will not open for
trading any additional series of options
in that class and may also limit any new
opening transactions in those options
series that have already been opened.
The Exchange proposes to eliminate this
provision because (1) it limits investors’
ability to use options to hedge existing
E:\FR\FM\14DEN1.SGM
14DEN1
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 239 / Wednesday, December 14, 2005 / Notices
equity positions in such securities, and
(2) it is not necessary in the context of
the rest of Rule 5.6(b).
First, Rule PCX 5.6(b)(5) can and does
impact investors’ interests by preventing
them from using new options series to
hedge positions that may hold in the
underlying security of companies that
fail to make timely reports required by
the Act. The Exchange states that such
a restriction is inconsistent with the
rules and regulations in the markets for
the underlying securities because no
similar trading restriction is placed
upon the trading of the underlying
security itself. Thus, Rule 5.6(b)(5) only
serves to limit the abilities of
shareholders in such companies who
may wish to hedge their positions with
new options series, at a time when the
ability to hedge may be particularly
important.
The PCX believes that Rule 5.6(b)(5)
has outlived any usefulness and now
serves to unnecessarily burden and
confuse the investing public. This
provision was appropriate when it was
first implemented when the listing and
trading of standardized options was still
in its infancy and information
pertaining to public companies was not
readily available to the general investing
public. The Exchange believes that
today’s listed options market, however,
is a mature one with investors who have
access to a significant amount of realtime market information to assist them
in making informed investment
decisions, including information as to
whether companies have timely filed
reports as required by the Act, and if
not, why not. Therefore, the Exchange
states that there is no reason to continue
limiting investors’ ability to trade in
options classes, including new series
within those classes, simply because a
company is not timely in filing its
reports. The Exchange further believes
that this restriction is further misplaced,
considering that investors are not
similarly restricted from buying or
selling shares of the underlying security
in the equity markets.
Moreover, the Exchange believes that
Rule 5.6(b)(5) limits an investor’s ability
to hedge his underlying stock positions
at a time when he may be in most need
to protect his investment. The failure of
a public company to comply with its
reporting requirements under the Act
could cause a significant movement in
the price of that company’s stock.
Restricting the Exchange from opening
new options series may leave investors
without means to hedge their positions
with options contracts at strike prices
that more accurately reflect the
contemporaneous price trends of the
underlying stock.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:29 Dec 13, 2005
Jkt 208001
Clearly, new options series on a
security should not be permitted to be
opened if the underlying security ceases
to be an NMS stock. Typically, the
Exchange becomes aware of issues that
may impact the continued listing of a
security well before that security is
delisted from its primary market.
Exchange staff routinely monitors daily
press releases and informational
releases disseminated by various
entities, such as, the primary listing
market of a security and private news
services, in an effort to monitor the
activities and news items pertaining to
the issuers of securities that underlie
options traded on the Exchange. In
many cases, when an issuer fails to
comply with its reporting requirements
under the Act, the issuer is given a
substantial amount of time to cure this
deficiency before the primary listing
market actually delists the issuer’s
security. Many times, the issuer is able
to comply without its security ever
being delisted. During this period, PCX
staff continually monitors the status of
the issuer’s compliance with its
reporting requirements to determine
whether the security may be delisted.
Finally, the primary listing market
typically issues a press release well in
advance of delisting an issuer’s security
to give investors and other market
participants adequate notice.
Given the availability of data and
information relating to public issuers of
securities in today’s markets, and in
light of the extensive amount of
additional continued listing standards
under Rule 5.6(b), waiting until a
security is actually delisted by its
primary listing market is the appropriate
point at which to restrict the issuance of
new options series in an options class.
Accordingly, the Exchange hereby
proposes to eliminate PCX Rule
5.6(b)(5).
Additionally, as a matter of
‘‘housekeeping,’’ the Exchange also
proposes to clarify Exchange Rule 5.3(b)
and Rule 5.6(b)(6), which govern the
criteria for the initial and continued
listing of options on a particular
security, respectively. Both of these
provisions include as part of the criteria,
a requirement that the underlying
security must be a national market
system security (‘‘NMS security’’). As
part of the recently adopted Regulation
NMS, among other things, the
Commission revised the definition of an
NMS security.6 Specifically, Rule
600(b)(46) under Regulation NMS
defines an NMS security as ‘‘any
security or class of securities for which
transaction reports are collected,
processed, and made available pursuant
to an effective transaction reporting
plan, or an effective national market
system plan for reporting transactions in
listed options.’’ Rule 600(b)(47) also
defines an ‘‘NMS stock’’ as any NMS
security other than an option. As such,
PCX Rule 5.3(b) and Rule 5.6(b)(5) will
be amended to reflect these new terms.
2. Statutory Basis
The Exchange believes that the
proposed rule change is consistent with
Section 6(b)7 of the Act, in general, and
furthers the objectives of Section
6(b)(5),8 in particular, in that it is
designed to facilitate transactions in
securities, to promote just and equitable
principles of trade, to enhance
competition, and to protect investors
and the public interest.
B. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement on Burden on Competition
The Exchange does not believe that
the proposed rule change will impose
any burden on competition that is not
necessary or appropriate in furtherance
of the purposes of the Act.
C. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement on Comments on the
Proposed Rule Change Received From
Members, Participants, or Others
Written comments on the proposed
rule change were neither solicited nor
received.
III. Date of Effectiveness of the
Proposed Rule Change and Timing for
Commission Action
The Exchange has designated the
proposed rule change as one that: (i)
Does not significantly affect the
protection of investors or the public
interest; (ii) does not impose any
significant burden on competition; and
(iii) does not become operative for 30
days from the date on which it was
filed, or such shorter time as the
Commission may designate. Therefore,
the foregoing rule change has become
effective pursuant to Section 19(b)(3)(A)
of the Act 9 and Rule 19b–4(f)(6)
thereunder.10 At any time within 60
days after the filing of the proposed rule
change, the Commission may summarily
abrogate the rule change if it appears to
the Commission such action is
necessary or appropriate in the public
interest, for the protection of investors,
or otherwise in furtherance of the
purposes of the Act.
7 15
U.S.C. 78f(b).
U.S.C. 78f(b)(5).
9 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A).
10 17 CFR 240.19b–4(f)(6).
8 15
6 See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 51808
(June 9, 2005); 70 FR 37496 (June 29, 2005).
PO 00000
Frm 00092
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
74079
E:\FR\FM\14DEN1.SGM
14DEN1
74080
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 239 / Wednesday, December 14, 2005 / Notices
Pursuant to Rule 19b–4(f)(6)(iii) under
the Act,11 the proposal does not become
operative for 30 days after the date of its
filing, or such shorter time as the
Commission may designate if consistent
with the protection of investors and the
public interest. The PCX has asked the
Commission to waive the 30-day
operative delay and the five day prefiling notice requirement. Because the
proposed rule change is based upon a
recently approved rule change by the
Chicago Board Options Exchange,
Incorporated (‘‘CBOE’’),12 and the
CBOE’s proposed rule change was
published for public notice and
comment, the Commission believes that
waiving the 30-day operative delay, as
well as the five day pre-filing notice
requirement, is consistent with the
protection of investors and the public
interest. Accordingly, the Commission
designates the proposal to be effective
and operative upon filing with the
Commission.13
IV. Solicitation of Comments
Interested persons are invited to
submit written data, views, and
arguments concerning the foregoing,
including whether the proposed rule
change is consistent with the Act.
Comments may be submitted by any of
the following methods:
rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the
submission, all subsequent
amendments, all written statements
with respect to the proposed rule
change that are filed with the
Commission, and all written
communications relating to the
proposed rule change between the
Commission and any person, other than
those that may be withheld from the
public in accordance with the
provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be
available for inspection and copying in
the Commission’s Public Reference
Room. Copies of such filing also will be
available for inspection and copying at
the principal offices of the Exchange.
All comments received will be posted
without change; the Commission does
not edit personal identifying
information from submissions. You
should submit only information that
you wish to make available publicly. All
submissions should refer to File
Number SR–PCX–2005–129 and should
be submitted on or before January 4,
2006.
For the Commission, by the Division of
Market Regulation, pursuant to delegated
authority.14
Jonathan G. Katz,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. E5–7328 Filed 12–13–05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8010–01–P
Electronic Comments
• Use the Commission’s Internet
comment form (https://www.sec.gov/
rules/sro.shtml); or
• Send an e-mail to rulecomments@sec.gov. Please include File
Number SR–PCX–2005–129 on the
subject line.
Paper Comments
• Send paper comments in triplicate
to Jonathan G. Katz, Secretary,
Securities and Exchange Commission,
Station Place, 100 F Street, NE.,
Washington, DC 20549–9303.
All submissions should refer to File
Number SR–PCX–2005–129. This file
number should be included on the
subject line if e-mail is used. To help the
Commission process and review your
comments more efficiently, please use
only one method. The Commission will
post all comments on the Commission’s
Internet Web site (https://www.sec.gov/
11 17
CFR 240.19b–4(f)(6)(iii).
Securities Exchange Act Release Nos.
52562 (October 4, 2005), 70 FR 59382 (October 12,
2005) (notice for SR–CBOE–2004–37) and 52779
(November 16, 2005), 70 FR 70902 (November 23,
2005) (approval order for SR–CBOE–2004–37).
13 For purposes only of waiving the 30-day
operative delay, the Commission has considered the
proposed rule’s impact on efficiency, competition,
and capital formation. See 15 U.S.C. 78c(f).
12 See
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:29 Dec 13, 2005
Jkt 208001
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
COMMISSION
[Release No. 34–52920; File No. SR–PCX–
2005–112]
Self-Regulatory Organizations; Pacific
Exchange, Inc.; Notice of Filing and
Immediate Effectiveness of Proposed
Rule Change and Amendment No. 1
Thereto Relating to Revisions to the
Series 4 Examination Program
December 7, 2005.
Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(‘‘Act’’),1 and Rule 19b–4 thereunder,2
notice is hereby given that on November
3, 2005, the Pacific Exchange, Inc.
(‘‘PCX’’ or ‘‘Exchange’’) filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission
(‘‘SEC’’ or ‘‘Commission’’) the proposed
rule change as described in Items I, II,
and III below, which Items have been
prepared by PCX. On November 22,
2005, PCX filed Amendment No. 1 to
the proposed rule change. PCX has
designated the proposed rule change as
constituting a stated policy, practice, or
interpretation with respect to the
meaning, administration, or
enforcement of an existing rule of the
self-regulatory organization pursuant to
Section 19(b)(3)(A)(i) of the Act 3 and
Rule 19b–4(f)(1) thereunder,4 which
renders the proposal effective upon
filing with the Commission. The
Commission is publishing this notice to
solicit comments on the proposed rule
change, as amended, from interested
persons.
I. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Terms of Substance of
the Proposed Rule Change
PCX is filing revisions to the study
outline and selection specifications for
the Limited Principal—Registered
Options (Series 4) examination program.
The proposed revisions update the
material to reflect changes to the laws,
rules, and regulations covered by the
examination, as well as modify the
content of the examination program to
track more closely the functional
workflow of a Series 4 limited principal.
PCX is not proposing any textual
changes to the PCX Rules. The revisions
that PCX is submitting with this filing
supersede all prior revisions to the
Series 4 examination program submitted
by PCX.
The revised study outline is available
on PCX’s Web site (https://
www.pacificex.com), at PCX, and at the
Commission. However, PCX has omitted
the Series 4 selection specifications
from this filing and has submitted the
specifications under separate cover to
the Commission with a request for
confidential treatment pursuant to Rule
24b–2 under the Act.5
II. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule
Change
In its filing with the Commission,
PCX included statements concerning the
purpose of and basis for the proposed
rule change and discussed any
comments it received on the proposed
rule change. The text of these statements
may be examined at the places specified
in Item IV below. PCX has prepared
summaries, set forth in Sections A, B,
and C below, of the most significant
aspects of such statements.
14 17
3 15
1 15
4 17
CFR 200.30–3(a)(12).
U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
2 17 CFR 240.19b–4.
PO 00000
Frm 00093
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A)(i).
CFR 240.19b–4(f)(1).
5 17 CFR 240.24b–2.
E:\FR\FM\14DEN1.SGM
14DEN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 239 (Wednesday, December 14, 2005)]
[Notices]
[Pages 74078-74080]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E5-7328]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
[Release No. 34-52911; File No. SR-PCX-2005-129]
Self-Regulatory Organizations; Notice of Filing and Immediate
Effectiveness of Proposed Rule Change by the Pacific Exchange, Inc. and
Amendment No. 1 Thereto Relating to the Approval of Securities That
Underlie Options Traded on the Exchange
December 7, 2005.
Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(``Act'') \1\ and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,\2\ notice is hereby given that
on November 23, 2005, the Pacific Exchange, Inc. (``PCX'' or
``Exchange'') filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
(``Commission'') the proposed rule change as described in Items I and
II below, which Items have been prepared by the self-regulatory
organization. On December 7, 2005, PCX filed Amendment No. 1 to the
proposed rule change.\3\ PCX filed the proposed rule change pursuant to
Section 19(b)(3)(A) of the Act,\4\ and Rule 19b-4(f)(6) thereunder,\5\
which renders the proposal, as amended, effective upon filing with the
Commission. The Commission is publishing this notice to solicit
comments on the proposed rule change, as amended, from interested
persons.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
\2\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
\3\ See Form 19b-4 dated December 7, 2005 which replaced the
original filing in its entirety (``Amendment No. 1''). Amendment No.
1 made clarifying changes and corrected typographical errors in the
original filing.
\4\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A).
\5\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f)(6).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
I. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Terms of Substance
of the Proposed Rule Change
The Exchange proposes changes to PCX rules pertaining to the
approval of securities that underlie options traded on the Exchange.
Specifically, the Exchange proposes to eliminate Rule 5.6(b)(5) and
amend Rule 5.6(b)(6) and Rule 5.3(b). A copy of the proposed rule
change is available on the PCX Web site, (www.pacificex.com), at the
PCX's Office of the Secretary and at the Commission's Public Reference
Room.
II. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change
In its filing with the Commission, the self-regulatory organization
included statements concerning the purpose of and basis for the
proposed rule change and discussed any comments it received on the
proposed rule change. The text of these statements may be examined at
the places specified in Item IV below. The self-regulatory organization
has prepared summaries, set forth in sections A, B and C below, of the
most significant aspects of such statements.
A. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change
1. Purpose
The purpose of this Amendment No. 1 is to make clarifying changes
and correct typographical errors in the original filing. This Amendment
No. 1 replaces the original rule filing in its entirety. The Exchange
proposes changes to PCX rules pertaining to the approval of securities
that underlie options traded on the Exchange. Specifically, the
Exchange proposes to eliminate Rule 5.6(b)(5) and amend Rule 5.6(b)(6)
and Rule 5.3(b).
PCX Rule 5.6(b) sets forth various situations under which an
underlying security previously approved for options trading will in
usual circumstances be deemed to no longer meet Exchange requirements
for the continuance of such approval. In such circumstances, Rule
5.6(b)(5) provides that the Exchange will not open for trading any
additional series of options in that class and may also limit any new
opening transactions in those options series that have already been
opened. The Exchange proposes to eliminate this provision because (1)
it limits investors' ability to use options to hedge existing
[[Page 74079]]
equity positions in such securities, and (2) it is not necessary in the
context of the rest of Rule 5.6(b).
First, Rule PCX 5.6(b)(5) can and does impact investors' interests
by preventing them from using new options series to hedge positions
that may hold in the underlying security of companies that fail to make
timely reports required by the Act. The Exchange states that such a
restriction is inconsistent with the rules and regulations in the
markets for the underlying securities because no similar trading
restriction is placed upon the trading of the underlying security
itself. Thus, Rule 5.6(b)(5) only serves to limit the abilities of
shareholders in such companies who may wish to hedge their positions
with new options series, at a time when the ability to hedge may be
particularly important.
The PCX believes that Rule 5.6(b)(5) has outlived any usefulness
and now serves to unnecessarily burden and confuse the investing
public. This provision was appropriate when it was first implemented
when the listing and trading of standardized options was still in its
infancy and information pertaining to public companies was not readily
available to the general investing public. The Exchange believes that
today's listed options market, however, is a mature one with investors
who have access to a significant amount of real-time market information
to assist them in making informed investment decisions, including
information as to whether companies have timely filed reports as
required by the Act, and if not, why not. Therefore, the Exchange
states that there is no reason to continue limiting investors' ability
to trade in options classes, including new series within those classes,
simply because a company is not timely in filing its reports. The
Exchange further believes that this restriction is further misplaced,
considering that investors are not similarly restricted from buying or
selling shares of the underlying security in the equity markets.
Moreover, the Exchange believes that Rule 5.6(b)(5) limits an
investor's ability to hedge his underlying stock positions at a time
when he may be in most need to protect his investment. The failure of a
public company to comply with its reporting requirements under the Act
could cause a significant movement in the price of that company's
stock. Restricting the Exchange from opening new options series may
leave investors without means to hedge their positions with options
contracts at strike prices that more accurately reflect the
contemporaneous price trends of the underlying stock.
Clearly, new options series on a security should not be permitted
to be opened if the underlying security ceases to be an NMS stock.
Typically, the Exchange becomes aware of issues that may impact the
continued listing of a security well before that security is delisted
from its primary market. Exchange staff routinely monitors daily press
releases and informational releases disseminated by various entities,
such as, the primary listing market of a security and private news
services, in an effort to monitor the activities and news items
pertaining to the issuers of securities that underlie options traded on
the Exchange. In many cases, when an issuer fails to comply with its
reporting requirements under the Act, the issuer is given a substantial
amount of time to cure this deficiency before the primary listing
market actually delists the issuer's security. Many times, the issuer
is able to comply without its security ever being delisted. During this
period, PCX staff continually monitors the status of the issuer's
compliance with its reporting requirements to determine whether the
security may be delisted. Finally, the primary listing market typically
issues a press release well in advance of delisting an issuer's
security to give investors and other market participants adequate
notice.
Given the availability of data and information relating to public
issuers of securities in today's markets, and in light of the extensive
amount of additional continued listing standards under Rule 5.6(b),
waiting until a security is actually delisted by its primary listing
market is the appropriate point at which to restrict the issuance of
new options series in an options class. Accordingly, the Exchange
hereby proposes to eliminate PCX Rule 5.6(b)(5).
Additionally, as a matter of ``housekeeping,'' the Exchange also
proposes to clarify Exchange Rule 5.3(b) and Rule 5.6(b)(6), which
govern the criteria for the initial and continued listing of options on
a particular security, respectively. Both of these provisions include
as part of the criteria, a requirement that the underlying security
must be a national market system security (``NMS security''). As part
of the recently adopted Regulation NMS, among other things, the
Commission revised the definition of an NMS security.\6\ Specifically,
Rule 600(b)(46) under Regulation NMS defines an NMS security as ``any
security or class of securities for which transaction reports are
collected, processed, and made available pursuant to an effective
transaction reporting plan, or an effective national market system plan
for reporting transactions in listed options.'' Rule 600(b)(47) also
defines an ``NMS stock'' as any NMS security other than an option. As
such, PCX Rule 5.3(b) and Rule 5.6(b)(5) will be amended to reflect
these new terms.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\6\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 51808 (June 9,
2005); 70 FR 37496 (June 29, 2005).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
2. Statutory Basis
The Exchange believes that the proposed rule change is consistent
with Section 6(b)\7\ of the Act, in general, and furthers the
objectives of Section 6(b)(5),\8\ in particular, in that it is designed
to facilitate transactions in securities, to promote just and equitable
principles of trade, to enhance competition, and to protect investors
and the public interest.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\7\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b).
\8\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(5).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
B. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Burden on Competition
The Exchange does not believe that the proposed rule change will
impose any burden on competition that is not necessary or appropriate
in furtherance of the purposes of the Act.
C. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Comments on the Proposed
Rule Change Received From Members, Participants, or Others
Written comments on the proposed rule change were neither solicited
nor received.
III. Date of Effectiveness of the Proposed Rule Change and Timing for
Commission Action
The Exchange has designated the proposed rule change as one that:
(i) Does not significantly affect the protection of investors or the
public interest; (ii) does not impose any significant burden on
competition; and (iii) does not become operative for 30 days from the
date on which it was filed, or such shorter time as the Commission may
designate. Therefore, the foregoing rule change has become effective
pursuant to Section 19(b)(3)(A) of the Act \9\ and Rule 19b-4(f)(6)
thereunder.\10\ At any time within 60 days after the filing of the
proposed rule change, the Commission may summarily abrogate the rule
change if it appears to the Commission such action is necessary or
appropriate in the public interest, for the protection of investors, or
otherwise in furtherance of the purposes of the Act.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\9\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A).
\10\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f)(6).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
[[Page 74080]]
Pursuant to Rule 19b-4(f)(6)(iii) under the Act,\11\ the proposal
does not become operative for 30 days after the date of its filing, or
such shorter time as the Commission may designate if consistent with
the protection of investors and the public interest. The PCX has asked
the Commission to waive the 30-day operative delay and the five day
pre-filing notice requirement. Because the proposed rule change is
based upon a recently approved rule change by the Chicago Board Options
Exchange, Incorporated (``CBOE''),\12\ and the CBOE's proposed rule
change was published for public notice and comment, the Commission
believes that waiving the 30-day operative delay, as well as the five
day pre-filing notice requirement, is consistent with the protection of
investors and the public interest. Accordingly, the Commission
designates the proposal to be effective and operative upon filing with
the Commission.\13\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\11\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f)(6)(iii).
\12\ See Securities Exchange Act Release Nos. 52562 (October 4,
2005), 70 FR 59382 (October 12, 2005) (notice for SR-CBOE-2004-37)
and 52779 (November 16, 2005), 70 FR 70902 (November 23, 2005)
(approval order for SR-CBOE-2004-37).
\13\ For purposes only of waiving the 30-day operative delay,
the Commission has considered the proposed rule's impact on
efficiency, competition, and capital formation. See 15 U.S.C.
78c(f).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
IV. Solicitation of Comments
Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views, and
arguments concerning the foregoing, including whether the proposed rule
change is consistent with the Act. Comments may be submitted by any of
the following methods:
Electronic Comments
Use the Commission's Internet comment form (https://
www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml); or
Send an e-mail to rule-comments@sec.gov. Please include
File Number SR-PCX-2005-129 on the subject line.
Paper Comments
Send paper comments in triplicate to Jonathan G. Katz,
Secretary, Securities and Exchange Commission, Station Place, 100 F
Street, NE., Washington, DC 20549-9303.
All submissions should refer to File Number SR-PCX-2005-129. This file
number should be included on the subject line if e-mail is used. To
help the Commission process and review your comments more efficiently,
please use only one method. The Commission will post all comments on
the Commission's Internet Web site (https://www.sec.gov/rules/
sro.shtml). Copies of the submission, all subsequent amendments, all
written statements with respect to the proposed rule change that are
filed with the Commission, and all written communications relating to
the proposed rule change between the Commission and any person, other
than those that may be withheld from the public in accordance with the
provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be available for inspection and
copying in the Commission's Public Reference Room. Copies of such
filing also will be available for inspection and copying at the
principal offices of the Exchange. All comments received will be posted
without change; the Commission does not edit personal identifying
information from submissions. You should submit only information that
you wish to make available publicly. All submissions should refer to
File Number SR-PCX-2005-129 and should be submitted on or before
January 4, 2006.
For the Commission, by the Division of Market Regulation,
pursuant to delegated authority.\14\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\14\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Jonathan G. Katz,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. E5-7328 Filed 12-13-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8010-01-P