Self-Regulatory Organizations; American Stock Exchange LLC; Notice of Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of Proposed Rule Change to Adopt an Options Licensing Fee for Options on Certain PowerShares Exchange-Traded Funds, 74065-74067 [E5-7307]
Download as PDF
<![CDATA[
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 239 / Wednesday, December 14, 2005 / Notices
12f–5 under the Act,17 which provides
that an exchange shall not extend UTP
to a security unless the exchange has in
effect a rule or rules providing for
transactions in the class or type of
security to which the exchange extends
UTP. Amex rules deem the Shares to be
equity securities, thus trading in the
Shares will be subject to the Exchange’s
existing rules governing the trading of
equity securities.18
The Commission further believes that
the proposal is consistent with Section
11A(a)(1)(C)(iii) of the Act,19 which sets
forth Congress’s finding that it is in the
public interest and appropriate for the
protection of investors and the
maintenance of fair and orderly markets
to assure the availability to brokers,
dealers, and investors of information
with respect to quotations for and
transactions in securities. Quotations for
and last sale information regarding the
Shares are disseminated through the
Consolidated Quotation System.
Furthermore, the NYSE disseminates
through the facilities of CTA an updated
IOPV for the Shares at least every 15
seconds from 9:30 a.m. to 4:15 p.m. E.T.
The Exchange will cease trading in
the Shares if (a) the primary market
stops trading the Shares because of a
regulatory halt similar to a halt based on
Amex Rule 117 and/or a halt because
dissemination of the IOPV and/or
underlying index value has ceased or (b)
the primary market delists the Shares.
In support of this proposed rule
change, the Exchange has made the
following representations:
1. Amex has appropriate rules to
facilitate transactions in this type of
security.
2. Amex surveillance procedures are
adequate to properly monitor the
trading of the Shares on the Exchange.
3. Amex will distribute an
Information Circular to its members
prior to the commencement of trading of
the Shares on the Exchange that
explains the terms, characteristics, and
risks of trading such shares.
4. Amex will require a member with
a customer that purchases the Shares on
the Exchange to provide that customer
with a product prospectus and will note
this prospectus delivery requirement in
the Information Circular.
17 17
CFR 240.12f–5.
Commission notes that Commentary .04 to
existing Amex Rule 190 will permit a specialist in
the Shares to create or redeem creation units of
these funds to facilitate the maintenance of a fair
and orderly market. The Commission previously
has found Commentary .04 to Amex Rule 190 to be
consistent with the Act. See Securities Exchange
Act Release No. 36947 (March 8, 1996), 61 FR
10606, 10612 (March 14, 1996) (SR–Amex–95–43).
19 15 U.S.C. 78k–1(a)(1)(C)(iii).
18 The
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:29 Dec 13, 2005
Jkt 208001
5. Amex will cease trading in the
Shares if (a) the primary market stops
trading the Shares because of a
regulatory halt similar to a halt based on
Amex Rule 117 and/or a halt because
dissemination of the IOPV and/or
underlying index value has ceased or (b)
the primary market delists the Shares.
This approval order is conditioned on
Amex’s adherence to these
representations.
The Commission finds good cause for
approving this proposed rule change, as
amended, before the thirtieth day after
the publication of notice thereof in the
Federal Register. As noted previously,
the Commission previously found that
the listing and trading of these Shares
on the NYSE is consistent with the
Act.20 The Commission presently is not
aware of any issue that would cause it
to revisit that earlier finding or preclude
the trading of these funds on the
Exchange pursuant to UTP. Therefore,
accelerating approval of this proposed
rule change should benefit investors by
creating, without undue delay,
additional competition in the market for
these Shares.
V. Conclusion
It Is therefore ordered, pursuant to
section 19(b)(2) of the Act, that the
proposed rule change (SR–Amex–2005–
092), is hereby approved on an
accelerated basis.
For the Commission, by the Division of
Market Regulation, pursuant to delegated
authority.21
Jonathan G. Katz,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. E5–7296 Filed 12–13–05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8010–01–P
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
COMMISSION
[Release No. 34–52925; File No. SR–Amex–
2005–126]
Self-Regulatory Organizations;
American Stock Exchange LLC; Notice
of Filing and Immediate Effectiveness
of Proposed Rule Change to Adopt an
Options Licensing Fee for Options on
Certain PowerShares ExchangeTraded Funds
December 8, 2005.
Pursuant to section 19(b)(1) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(‘‘Act’’) 1 and Rule 19b–4 thereunder,2
notice is hereby given that on December
5, 2005, the American Stock Exchange
20 See
NYSE Order, supra note 4.
CFR 200.30–3(a)(12).
1 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
2 17 CFR 240.19b–4.
LLC (‘‘Amex’’ or ‘‘Exchange’’) filed with
the Securities and Exchange
Commission (‘‘Commission’’) the
proposed rule change as described in
Items I, II, and III below, which Items
have been prepared by the Exchange.
Amex has designated this proposal as
one establishing or changing a due, fee,
or other charge imposed by a selfregulatory organization pursuant to
Section 19(b)(3)(A) of the Act 3 and Rule
19b–4(f)(2) thereunder,4 which renders
the proposal effective upon filing with
the Commission. The Commission is
publishing this notice to solicit
comments on the proposed rule change
from interested persons.
I. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Terms of Substance of
the Proposed Rule Change
Amex proposes to modify its Options
Fee Schedule by adopting a per-contract
license fee for the orders of specialists,
registered options traders, firms, nonmember market makers, and brokerdealers (collectively, ‘‘Market
Participants’’) in connection with
options transactions in two (2) new
PowerShares exchange-traded funds
(‘‘ETFs’’).
The text of the proposed rule change
is available on the Exchange’s Internet
Web site (https://www.amex.com), at the
Exchange’s principal office, and at the
Commission’s Public Reference Room.
II. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule
Change
In its filing with the Commission, the
Exchange included statements
concerning the purpose of, and basis for,
the proposed rule change and discussed
any comments it received on the
proposed rule change. The text of these
statements may be examined at the
places specified in Item IV below. The
Exchange has prepared summaries, set
forth in sections A, B, and C below, of
the most significant aspects of such
statements.
A. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule
Change
1. Purpose
The Exchange has entered into
numerous agreements with various
index providers for the purpose of
trading options on certain ETFs. As a
result, the Exchange is required to pay
index license fees to third parties as a
condition to the listing and trading of
21 17
PO 00000
Frm 00078
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
74065
3 15
4 17
E:\FR\FM\14DEN1.SGM
U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A).
CFR 240.19b–4(f)(2).
14DEN1
74066
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 239 / Wednesday, December 14, 2005 / Notices
these ETF options. In many cases, the
Exchange is required to pay a significant
licensing fee to the index provider that
may not be reimbursed. In an effort to
recoup the costs associated with certain
index licenses, the Exchange has
recently established per-contract
licensing fees for orders of Market
Participants that are collected on each
option transaction in certain designated
products in which such Market
Participant is a party.5
The purpose of the proposal is to
charge an options licensing fee in
connection with options on the
PowerShares Value Line Timeliness
Select Portfolio (symbol: PIV) and the
PowerShares Water Resources Portfolio
(symbol: PHO) (collectively,
‘‘PowerShares ETF options’’).
Specifically, Amex seeks to charge an
options licensing fee of $0.10 per
contract side for each PowerShares ETF
option for the orders of Market
Participants executed on the Exchange.
In all cases, the fee would be charged
only to the Exchange member through
whom such order is placed.
Amex represents that the proposed
options licensing fee would allow the
Exchange to recoup its costs in
connection with the index license fees
for the trading of the PowerShares ETF
options. The fee would be collected on
every Market Participant order executed
on the Exchange. The Exchange believes
that requiring the payment of a percontract licensing fee in connection
with the PowerShares ETF options by
those Market Participants that benefit
from the index license agreements is
justified and consistent with the rules of
the Exchange.
The Exchange notes that, in recent
years, it has revised a number of its fees
to better align Amex fees with the actual
cost of delivering services and reduce
Amex’s subsidization of such services.6
The Exchange represents that the
implementation of this proposal is
consistent with the reduction and/or
elimination of these subsidies. Amex
believes that this fee will help to
allocate to those Market Participants
engaging in transactions in PowerShares
ETF options a fair share of the related
costs of offering such options for
trading.
The Exchange asserts that the
proposal provides for an equitable
allocation of fees as required by section
5 See, e.g., Securities Exchange Act Release No.
52493 (September 22, 2005), 70 FR 56941
(September 29, 2005).
6 See, e.g., Securities Exchange Act Release No.
45360 (January 29, 2002), 67 FR 5626 (February 6,
2002); Securities Exchange Act Release No. 44286
(May 9, 2001), 66 FR 27187 (May 16, 2001).
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:29 Dec 13, 2005
Jkt 208001
6(b)(4) of the Act.7 In connection with
the adoption of an options licensing fee
for the PowerShares ETF options, the
Exchange notes that charging the
options licensing fee, where applicable,
to all Market Participant orders, except
for customer orders, is reasonable given
the competitive pressures in the
industry. Accordingly, the Exchange
seeks, through this proposal, to better
align its transaction charges with the
cost of providing trading products.
2. Statutory Basis
The Exchange believes that the
proposed rule change is consistent with
Section 6(b) of the Act 8 in general, and
furthers the objectives of section 6(b)(4)
of the Act 9 in particular, in that it
provides for the equitable allocation of
reasonable dues, fees, and other charges
among its members and other persons
using its facilities.
B. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement on Burden on Competition
The Exchange does not believe that
the proposed rule change will impose
any burden on competition that is not
necessary or appropriate in furtherance
of the purposes of the Act.
C. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement on Comments on the
Proposed Rule Change Received from
Members, Participants or Others
No written comments were solicited
or received with respect to the proposed
rule change.
III. Date of Effectiveness of the
Proposed Rule Change and Timing for
Commission Action
The foregoing proposed rule change
has become effective pursuant to section
19(b)(3)(A)(ii) of the Act 10 and Rule
19b–4(f)(2) 11 thereunder because it
establishes or changes a due, fee, or
other charge imposed by the Exchange.
At any time within 60 days of the filing
of the proposed rule change, the
Commission may summarily abrogate
such rule change if it appears to the
Commission that such action is
necessary or appropriate in the public
interest, for the protection of investors,
or otherwise in furtherance of the
purposes of the Act.
7 Section 6(b)(4) of the Act states that the rules of
a national securities exchange must ‘‘provide for the
equitable allocation of reasonable dues, fees, and
other charges among its members and issuers and
other persons using its facilities.’’ 15 U.S.C.
78f(b)(4).
8 15 U.S.C. 78f(b).
9 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(4).
10 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A)(ii).
11 17 CFR 19b–4(f)(2).
PO 00000
Frm 00079
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
IV. Solicitation of Comments
Interested persons are invited to
submit written data, views, and
arguments concerning the foregoing,
including whether the proposed rule
change is consistent with the Act.
Comments may be submitted by any of
the following methods:
Electronic Comments
• Use the Commission’s Internet
comment form (https://www.sec.gov/
rules/sro.shtml); or
• Send an e-mail to rulecomments@sec.gov. Please include File
No. SR–Amex–2005–126 on the subject
line.
Paper Comments
• Send paper comments in triplicate
to Jonathan G. Katz, Secretary,
Securities and Exchange Commission,
Station Place, 100 F Street, NE.,
Washington, DC 20549–9303.
All submissions should refer to File
Number SR–Amex–2005–126. This file
number should be included on the
subject line if e-mail is used. To help the
Commission process and review your
comments more efficiently, please use
only one method. The Commission will
post all comments on the Commission’s
Internet Web site (https://www.sec.gov/
rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the
submission, all subsequent
amendments, all written statements
with respect to the proposed rule
change that are filed with the
Commission, and all written
communications relating to the
proposed rule change between the
Commission and any person, other than
those that may be withheld from the
public in accordance with the
provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be
available for inspection and copying in
the Commission’s Public Reference
Room. Copies of the filing also will be
available for inspection and copying at
the principal office of Amex. All
comments received will be posted
without change; the Commission does
not edit personal identifying
information from submissions. You
should submit only information that
you wish to make available publicly. All
submissions should refer to File
Number SR–Amex–2005–126 and
should be submitted on or before
January 4, 2006.
E:\FR\FM\14DEN1.SGM
14DEN1
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 239 / Wednesday, December 14, 2005 / Notices
For the Commission, by the Division of
Market Regulation, pursuant to delegated
authority.12
Jonathan G. Katz,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. E5–7307 Filed 12–13–05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8010–01–P
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
COMMISSION
[Release No. 34–52914; File No. SR–CBOE–
2005–98]
Self-Regulatory Organizations;
Chicago Board Options Exchange,
Incorporated; Notice of Filing and
Immediate Effectiveness of Proposed
Rule Change Relating to Revisions to
the Series 9/10 Examination Program
December 7, 2005.
Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(‘‘Act’’),1 and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,2
notice is hereby given that on November
16, 2005, the Pacific Exchange, Inc.
(‘‘CBOE’’ or ‘‘Exchange’’) filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission
(‘‘SEC’’ or ‘‘Commission’’) the proposed
rule change as described in Items I, II,
and III below, which Items have been
prepared by the CBOE. CBOE has
designated the proposed rule change as
constituting a stated policy, practice, or
interpretation with respect to the
meaning, administration, or
enforcement of an existing rule of the
self-regulatory organization pursuant to
Section 19(b)(3)(A)(i) of the Act 3 and
Rule 19b–4(f)(1) thereunder,4 which
renders the proposal effective upon
filing with the Commission. The
Commission is publishing this notice to
solicit comments on the proposed rule
change from interested persons.
I. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Terms of Substance of
the Proposed Rule Change
CBOE is filing revisions to the study
outline and selection specifications for
the Limited Principal—General
Securities Sales Supervisor (Series 9/10)
examination program. The proposed
revisions update the material to reflect
changes to the laws, rules, and
regulations covered by the examination,
as well as modify the content of the
examination program to track more
closely the functional workflow of a
Series 9/10 limited principal. CBOE is
12 17
CFR 200.30–3(a)(12).
U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
2 17 CFR 240.19b–4.
3 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A)(i).
4 17 CFR 240.19b–4(f)(1).
1 15
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:29 Dec 13, 2005
not proposing any textual changes to the
Constitution or Rules of CBOE.
The revised study outline is attached
as Exhibit 3a. However, CBOE has
omitted the Series 9/10 selection
specifications from this filing and has
submitted the specifications under
separate cover to the Commission with
a request for confidential treatment
pursuant to the Commission’s
confidential treatment procedures under
the Freedom of Information Act.5 The
text of the proposed rule change is
available on the Exchange’s Web site
(https://www.cboe.com), at the
Exchange’s Office of the Secretary, and
at the Commission.
II. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule
Change
In its filing with the Commission,
CBOE included statements concerning
the purpose of and basis for the
proposed rule change and discussed any
comments it received on the proposed
rule change. The text of these statements
may be examined at the places specified
in Item IV below. CBOE has prepared
summaries, set forth in Sections A, B,
and C below, of the most significant
aspects of such statements.
A. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule
Change
1. Purpose
CBOE Rule 9.2 states that no member
organization shall be approved to
transact options business with the
public until those persons associated
with it who are designated as Options
Principals have been approved by and
registered with the Exchange. CBOE
Rule 9.2 further requires successful
completion of an examination
prescribed by the Exchange in order to
qualify for registration as an Options
Principal. The Series 9/10 examination,
an industry-wide examination, has been
designed for this purpose. The Series 9/
10 examination tests a candidate’s
knowledge of securities industry rules
and regulations and certain statutory
provisions pertinent to the supervision
of sales activities.
The Series 9/10 examination program
is shared by CBOE and the following
SROs: The American Stock Exchange
LLC, the National Association of
Securities Dealers, Inc. (‘‘NASD’’), the
Municipal Securities Rule Making
Board (‘‘MSRB’’), the New York Stock
Exchange, Inc. (‘‘NYSE’’), the Pacific
5 17
Jkt 208001
PO 00000
Fmt 4703
Exchange, Inc., and the Philadelphia
Stock Exchange, Inc.
A committee of industry
representatives, together with the staff
of CBOE and the other SROs, recently
undertook a periodic review of the
Series 9/10 examination program. As a
result of this review, CBOE is proposing
to update the content of the examination
to cover Regulation S–P,6 MSRB Rules
G–37/G–38, SRO research analyst and
anti-money laundering rules, municipal
fund securities (e.g., 529 college savings
plans), and exchange traded funds.
CBOE is further proposing revisions to
the study outline to reflect the SEC short
sale requirements. In addition, as part of
an ongoing effort to align the
examination more closely to the
supervisory duties of a Series 9/10
limited principal, CBOE is proposing to
modify the content of the examination
to track the functional workflow of a
Series 9/10 limited principal. Also,
CBOE is proposing to include questions
related to parallel rules of NASD, the
options exchanges, the MSRB and the
NYSE in the same section of the exam.
As a result of the revisions, CBOE is
proposing to modify the main section
headings and the number of questions
on each section of the Series 9/10 study
outline as follows: Section 1—Hiring,
Qualifications, and Continuing
Education, 9 questions; Section 2—
Supervision of Accounts and Sales
Activities, 94 questions; Section 3—
Conduct of Associated Persons, 14
questions; Section 4—Recordkeeping
Requirements, 8 questions; Section 5—
Municipal Securities Regulation, 20
questions; Section 6—Options
Regulation, 55 questions. Sections 1
through 5 constitute the Series 10
portion of the examination. Section 6
constitutes the Series 9 portion of the
examination. Series 10 covers general
securities and municipal securities, and
Series 9 covers options. The revised
examination continues to cover the
areas of knowledge required for the
supervision of sales activities.
CBOE is proposing these changes to
the entire content of the Series 9/10
examination, including the selection
specifications and question bank. The
number of questions on the Series 9/10
examination will remain at 200, and
candidates will continue to have 4
hours to complete the Series 10 portion
and 11⁄2 hours to complete the Series 9
portion. Also, each question will
continue to count one point, and each
candidate must correctly answer 70
percent of the questions on each series,
9 and 10, to receive a passing grade.
6 17 CFR 248.1–18; 17 CFR 248.30; and 17 CFR
248, Appendix A.
C.F.R. 200.83.
Frm 00080
74067
Sfmt 4703
E:\FR\FM\14DEN1.SGM
14DEN1
]]>Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 239 (Wednesday, December 14, 2005)]
[Notices]
[Pages 74065-74067]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E5-7307]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
[Release No. 34-52925; File No. SR-Amex-2005-126]
Self-Regulatory Organizations; American Stock Exchange LLC;
Notice of Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of Proposed Rule Change to
Adopt an Options Licensing Fee for Options on Certain PowerShares
Exchange-Traded Funds
December 8, 2005.
Pursuant to section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(``Act'') \1\ and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,\2\ notice is hereby given that
on December 5, 2005, the American Stock Exchange LLC (``Amex'' or
``Exchange'') filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
(``Commission'') the proposed rule change as described in Items I, II,
and III below, which Items have been prepared by the Exchange. Amex has
designated this proposal as one establishing or changing a due, fee, or
other charge imposed by a self-regulatory organization pursuant to
Section 19(b)(3)(A) of the Act \3\ and Rule 19b-4(f)(2) thereunder,\4\
which renders the proposal effective upon filing with the Commission.
The Commission is publishing this notice to solicit comments on the
proposed rule change from interested persons.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
\2\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
\3\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A).
\4\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f)(2).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
I. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Terms of Substance
of the Proposed Rule Change
Amex proposes to modify its Options Fee Schedule by adopting a per-
contract license fee for the orders of specialists, registered options
traders, firms, non-member market makers, and broker-dealers
(collectively, ``Market Participants'') in connection with options
transactions in two (2) new PowerShares exchange-traded funds
(``ETFs'').
The text of the proposed rule change is available on the Exchange's
Internet Web site (https://www.amex.com), at the Exchange's principal
office, and at the Commission's Public Reference Room.
II. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change
In its filing with the Commission, the Exchange included statements
concerning the purpose of, and basis for, the proposed rule change and
discussed any comments it received on the proposed rule change. The
text of these statements may be examined at the places specified in
Item IV below. The Exchange has prepared summaries, set forth in
sections A, B, and C below, of the most significant aspects of such
statements.
A. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change
1. Purpose
The Exchange has entered into numerous agreements with various
index providers for the purpose of trading options on certain ETFs. As
a result, the Exchange is required to pay index license fees to third
parties as a condition to the listing and trading of
[[Page 74066]]
these ETF options. In many cases, the Exchange is required to pay a
significant licensing fee to the index provider that may not be
reimbursed. In an effort to recoup the costs associated with certain
index licenses, the Exchange has recently established per-contract
licensing fees for orders of Market Participants that are collected on
each option transaction in certain designated products in which such
Market Participant is a party.\5\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\5\ See, e.g., Securities Exchange Act Release No. 52493
(September 22, 2005), 70 FR 56941 (September 29, 2005).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The purpose of the proposal is to charge an options licensing fee
in connection with options on the PowerShares Value Line Timeliness
Select Portfolio (symbol: PIV) and the PowerShares Water Resources
Portfolio (symbol: PHO) (collectively, ``PowerShares ETF options'').
Specifically, Amex seeks to charge an options licensing fee of $0.10
per contract side for each PowerShares ETF option for the orders of
Market Participants executed on the Exchange. In all cases, the fee
would be charged only to the Exchange member through whom such order is
placed.
Amex represents that the proposed options licensing fee would allow
the Exchange to recoup its costs in connection with the index license
fees for the trading of the PowerShares ETF options. The fee would be
collected on every Market Participant order executed on the Exchange.
The Exchange believes that requiring the payment of a per-contract
licensing fee in connection with the PowerShares ETF options by those
Market Participants that benefit from the index license agreements is
justified and consistent with the rules of the Exchange.
The Exchange notes that, in recent years, it has revised a number
of its fees to better align Amex fees with the actual cost of
delivering services and reduce Amex's subsidization of such
services.\6\ The Exchange represents that the implementation of this
proposal is consistent with the reduction and/or elimination of these
subsidies. Amex believes that this fee will help to allocate to those
Market Participants engaging in transactions in PowerShares ETF options
a fair share of the related costs of offering such options for trading.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\6\ See, e.g., Securities Exchange Act Release No. 45360
(January 29, 2002), 67 FR 5626 (February 6, 2002); Securities
Exchange Act Release No. 44286 (May 9, 2001), 66 FR 27187 (May 16,
2001).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Exchange asserts that the proposal provides for an equitable
allocation of fees as required by section 6(b)(4) of the Act.\7\ In
connection with the adoption of an options licensing fee for the
PowerShares ETF options, the Exchange notes that charging the options
licensing fee, where applicable, to all Market Participant orders,
except for customer orders, is reasonable given the competitive
pressures in the industry. Accordingly, the Exchange seeks, through
this proposal, to better align its transaction charges with the cost of
providing trading products.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\7\ Section 6(b)(4) of the Act states that the rules of a
national securities exchange must ``provide for the equitable
allocation of reasonable dues, fees, and other charges among its
members and issuers and other persons using its facilities.'' 15
U.S.C. 78f(b)(4).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
2. Statutory Basis
The Exchange believes that the proposed rule change is consistent
with Section 6(b) of the Act \8\ in general, and furthers the
objectives of section 6(b)(4) of the Act \9\ in particular, in that it
provides for the equitable allocation of reasonable dues, fees, and
other charges among its members and other persons using its facilities.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\8\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b).
\9\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(4).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
B. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Burden on Competition
The Exchange does not believe that the proposed rule change will
impose any burden on competition that is not necessary or appropriate
in furtherance of the purposes of the Act.
C. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Comments on the Proposed
Rule Change Received from Members, Participants or Others
No written comments were solicited or received with respect to the
proposed rule change.
III. Date of Effectiveness of the Proposed Rule Change and Timing for
Commission Action
The foregoing proposed rule change has become effective pursuant to
section 19(b)(3)(A)(ii) of the Act \10\ and Rule 19b-4(f)(2) \11\
thereunder because it establishes or changes a due, fee, or other
charge imposed by the Exchange. At any time within 60 days of the
filing of the proposed rule change, the Commission may summarily
abrogate such rule change if it appears to the Commission that such
action is necessary or appropriate in the public interest, for the
protection of investors, or otherwise in furtherance of the purposes of
the Act.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\10\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A)(ii).
\11\ 17 CFR 19b-4(f)(2).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
IV. Solicitation of Comments
Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views, and
arguments concerning the foregoing, including whether the proposed rule
change is consistent with the Act. Comments may be submitted by any of
the following methods:
Electronic Comments
Use the Commission's Internet comment form (https://
www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml); or
Send an e-mail to rule-comments@sec.gov. Please include
File No. SR-Amex-2005-126 on the subject line.
Paper Comments
Send paper comments in triplicate to Jonathan G. Katz,
Secretary, Securities and Exchange Commission, Station Place, 100 F
Street, NE., Washington, DC 20549-9303.
All submissions should refer to File Number SR-Amex-2005-126. This file
number should be included on the subject line if e-mail is used. To
help the Commission process and review your comments more efficiently,
please use only one method. The Commission will post all comments on
the Commission's Internet Web site (https://www.sec.gov/rules/
sro.shtml). Copies of the submission, all subsequent amendments, all
written statements with respect to the proposed rule change that are
filed with the Commission, and all written communications relating to
the proposed rule change between the Commission and any person, other
than those that may be withheld from the public in accordance with the
provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be available for inspection and
copying in the Commission's Public Reference Room. Copies of the filing
also will be available for inspection and copying at the principal
office of Amex. All comments received will be posted without change;
the Commission does not edit personal identifying information from
submissions. You should submit only information that you wish to make
available publicly. All submissions should refer to File Number SR-
Amex-2005-126 and should be submitted on or before January 4, 2006.
[[Page 74067]]
For the Commission, by the Division of Market Regulation,
pursuant to delegated authority.\12\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\12\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Jonathan G. Katz,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. E5-7307 Filed 12-13-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8010-01-P
