Certain Welded Stainless Steel Pipe From Korea and Taiwan, 73452-73453 [E5-7245]

Download as PDF 73452 Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 237 / Monday, December 12, 2005 / Notices Benchmarks That Reflect Market Conditions in Jurisdiction in Which the Good Is Provided Comment 21: Whether Private Standing Timber in the Marities is Comparable to Standing Timber in Provinces East of British Columbia Comment 22: Whether Quebec’s Private Forest Is More Competitive than That of the Maritimes Comment 23: Whether the Department Market Conditions in New Brunswick and Nova Scotia Are Similar Enough to Be Combined into a Single Benchmark Price Comment 24: Whether the Private Stumpage Prices in the Maritimes, as Reported by AGFOR, Reflect Actual Stumpage Transactions Comment 25: Whether Tree Diameters in Alberta and the Maritimes are Sufficiently Comparable 4. Use of U.S. Prices as Benchmark for Measuring the Adequacy of Remuneration Comment 26: Montana as an Alternate Benchmark for Alberta Comment 27: Use of Cross-Border Benchmark Comment 28: Whether Fundamental Differences in Log Market Conditions Exist in the U.S. Pacific Northwest and British Columbia Comment 29: Whether U.S. Log Price Data Are Complete, Representative, and Reliable Comment 30: B.C. Log Import and Export Data D. Stumpage Calculation Issues 1. Calculation of Maritime Benchmark Comment 31: Data Used to Index Private Maritime Stumpage Prices to the POR Comment 32: Rounding of the Maritimes Stumpage Index Comment 33: Method Used to Weight Average Benchmark Prices in New Brunswick Comment 34: Weighting of Benchmark Studwood Stumpage Prices in Nova Scotia Comment 35: Method for Deriving a Single Weight Average Price for Standing Timber Prices from New Brunswick and Nova Scotia Comment 36: Application of Marketing Fees Added to Maritimes Benchmark Comment 37: Calculation of Marketing Board Levies Added to Private Stumpage Prices in New Brunswick Comment 38: Calculation of Silviculture Fee Added to Private Stumpage Prices in Nova Scotia 2. Calculation of British Columbia Benchmark Comment 39: Factor Used to Convert from Tons to Thousand Board Feet Comment 40: Log Market Report Data Relate Only to Small Log Sales Comment 41: High Value of Cypress VerDate Aug<31>2005 17:51 Dec 09, 2005 Jkt 208001 Comment 42: Log Price Data from Other States that Border British Columbia Comment 43: Negative Species-Specific Benefit Comment 44: Volume Conversion Factors Used for U.S. Log Prices Expressed in Thousand Board Feet Comment 45: Pond Values Comment 46: Stud Log Values Comment 47: Additional U.S. Log Price Data Comment 48: Averaging of U.S. Benchmark Log Values 3. Adjustments to Government Stumpage Prices a. Alberta Comment 49: Whether the Department Properly Adjusted the GOA’s Administered Stumpage Price b. British Columbia Comment 50: Old-Growth Adjustment Comment 51: Other Harvesting Costs for B.C. Interior Comment 52: Proper Calculation of Profit Earned by B.C. Tenureholders c. Saskatchewan Comment 53: Whether the Department Properly Adjusted the GOS’s Administered Stumpage Price d. Manitoba Comment 54: Whether the Department Properly Adjusted the GOM’s Administered Stumpage Price e. Ontario Comment 55: Whether the Department Properly Adjusted the GOO’s Administered Stumpage Price to Account for Road Costs Comment 56: Whether the Department Properly Adjusted the GOO’s Administered Stumpage Price to Account for Longer Distances from Stump to Mill and Mill to Market Comment 57: Whether Maritimes ‘‘Studwood’’ Is More Comparable To Timber Entering Ontario Sawmills Than Maritimes ‘‘Sawlogs’’ f. Quebec Comment 58: Quebec Road Costs E. Whether to Measure the Adequacy of Remuneration of the Administered Stumpage Programs Under Tier III of the Department’s Regulations Comment 59: Market Principles as Benchmark Under Third-Tier Category F. Miscellaneous Comment Comment 60: Tenure Security G. Non-Stumpage Program Issues Comment 61: Whether Loans Provided by Community Futures Development Corporations Provide a Countervailable Subsidy Comment 62: Western Economic Diversification Program Comment 63: Whether the Canadian Forest Service Industry, Trade and Economics Program Provides a Countervailable Subsidy Comment 64: Article 28 of Investissement Quebec PO 00000 Frm 00023 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 Comment 65: SGF-Rexfor Comment 66: Whether the Land Base Investment Program (LBIP) is Countervailable Comment 67: Whether the Private Forest Development Program (PFDP) Is Countervailable Comment 68: Natural Resources Canada (NRCan) Softwood Lumber Marketing Research Subsidies Under the Value-toWood Program (VWP) and the National Research Institutes Initiative (NRII) Comment 69: Whether Forestry Innovation Investment (‘‘FII’’) Expenditures Are Countervailable Comment 70: Denominator Used to Calculate the FII Subsidies Comment 71: Litigation-Related Payments to Forest Products Association of Canada (FPAC) Comment 72: British Columbia Private Forest Land Tax Program [FR Doc. 05–23921 Filed 12–9–05; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 3510–DS–S INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION [Investigation Nos. 731–TA–540 and 541 (Second Review)] Certain Welded Stainless Steel Pipe From Korea and Taiwan United States International Trade Commission. ACTION: Notice of Commission determination to conduct full five-year reviews concerning the antidumping duty orders on certain welded stainless steel pipe from Korea and Taiwan. AGENCY: SUMMARY: The Commission hereby gives notice that it will proceed with full reviews pursuant to section 751(c)(5) of the Tariff Act of 1930 (19 U.S.C. 1675(c)(5)) to determine whether revocation of the antidumping duty orders on certain welded stainless steel pipe from Korea and Taiwan would be likely to lead to continuation or recurrence of material injury within a reasonably foreseeable time. A schedule for the reviews will be established and announced at a later date. For further information concerning the conduct of these reviews and rules of general application, consult the Commission’s Rules of Practice and Procedure, part 201, subparts A through E (19 CFR part 201), and part 207, subparts A, D, E, and F (19 CFR part 207). EFFECTIVE DATE: December 5, 2005. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mary Messer (202–205–3193), Office of Investigations, U.S. International Trade Commission, 500 E Street, SW., Washington, DC 20436. Hearing- E:\FR\FM\12DEN1.SGM 12DEN1 Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 237 / Monday, December 12, 2005 / Notices impaired persons can obtain information on this matter by contacting the Commission’s TDD terminal on 202– 205–1810. Persons with mobility impairments who will need special assistance in gaining access to the Commission should contact the Office of the Secretary at 202–205–2000. General information concerning the Commission may also be obtained by accessing its Internet server (http:// www.usitc.gov). The public record for these reviews may be viewed on the Commission’s electronic docket (EDIS) at http://edis.usitc.gov. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On December 5, 2005, the Commission determined that it should proceed to full reviews in the subject five-year reviews pursuant to section 751(c)(5) of the Act. The Commission found that the domestic interested party group response to its notice of institution (70 FR 52124, September 1, 2005) was adequate but that the respondent interested party group response was inadequate. However, the Commission found that other circumstances warranted conducting full reviews.1 A record of the Commissioners’ votes, the Commission’s statement on adequacy, and any individual Commissioner’s statements will be available from the Office of the Secretary and at the Commission’s Web site. Authority: These reviews are being conducted under authority of title VII of the Tariff Act of 1930; this notice is published pursuant to section 207.62 of the Commission’s rules. Issued: December 7, 2005. By order of the Commission. Marilyn R. Abbott, Secretary to the Commission. [FR Doc. E5–7245 Filed 12–9–05; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 7020–02–P DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE Technology Administration Request for Nominations of Members to Serve on the National Medal of Technology Nomination Evaluation Committee Technology Administration, Commerce. ACTION: Notice of request for nominations. AGENCY: The Department of Commerce (Technology Administration) is requesting nominations of individuals SUMMARY: 1 Chairman Stephen Koplan and Commissioners Jennifer A. Hillman and Shara L. Aranoff dissenting. VerDate Aug<31>2005 17:51 Dec 09, 2005 Jkt 208001 to serve on the National Medal of Technology Nomination Evaluation Committee. Technology Administration will consider nominations received in response to this notice as well as from other sources. The SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section of this notice provides Committee and membership criteria. Please submit nominations within 30 days of the publication of this notice. ADDRESSES: Submit nominations to Mildred Porter, Director, National Medal of Technology Program, Technology Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue, NW., Room 4817, Washington, DC 20230. Nominations also may be submitted via fax at 202– 482–6275, or e-mail to: nmt@technology.gov. DATES: FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mildred Porter, Director, National Medal of Technology Program, Technology Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue, NW., Room 4817, Washington, DC 20230, telephone (202) 482–5572. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Committee was established in accordance with the Federal Advisory Committee Act (FACA) (Title 5, United States Code, Appendix 2). The following provides information about the Committee and membership. 1. Committee members are appointed by and serve at the discretion of the Secretary of Commerce. The Committee provides advice to the Secretary on the implementation of Public Law 96–480 (15 U.S.C. 3711). Public Law 105–309; 15 U.S.C. 3711, Section 10, approved by the 105th Congress in 1998, added the National Technology Medal for Environmental Technology. 2. The Committee functions solely as an advisory body under the FACA. Members are appointed to the 12member Committee for a period of three-years. Each will be reevaluated at the conclusion of the three-year term with the prospect of renewal, pending Advisory Committee needs and the Secretary’s concurrence. Selection of membership is made in accordance with applicable Department of Commerce guidelines. 3. Members are responsible for reviewing nominations and making recommendations for the Nation’s highest honor for technological innovation, awarded annually by the President of the United States. Members of the Committee have an understanding of, and experience in, developing and PO 00000 Frm 00024 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 73453 utilizing technological innovation and/ or they are familiar with the education, training, employment and management of technological human resources. 4. Under the FACA, membership in a committee must be balanced. To achieve balance, the Department is seeking additional nominations of candidates from small, medium-sized, and large businesses or with special expertise in the following sub sectors of the technology enterprise: • Medical Innovations/ Bioengineering and Biomedical Technology • Technology Management/ Computing/IT/Manufacturing Innovation • Technology Manpower/Workforce Training/Education Committee members are present or former Chief Executive Officers, former winners of the National Medal of Technology; presidents or distinguished faculty of universities; or senior executives of non-profit organizations. As such, they not only offer the stature of their positions but also possess intimate knowledge of the forces determining future directions for their organizations and industries. The Committee as a whole is balanced in representing geographical, professional, and diversity interests. Nomination Information: 1. Nominees must be U.S. citizens, must be able to fully participate in meetings pertaining to the review and selection of finalists for the National Medal of Technology, and must uphold the confidential nature of an independent peer review and competitive selection process. 2. The Department of Commerce is committed to equal opportunity in the workplace and seeks a broad-based and diverse Committee membership. Michelle O’Neill, Acting Under Secretary for Technology, Technology Administration. [FR Doc. E5–7185 Filed 12–9–05; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 3510–18–P DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE Office of the Secretary Proposed Collection; Comment Request Office of the Under Secretary of Defense (Personnel and Readiness), DoD. ACTION: Notice. AGENCY: In compliance with section 3506(c)(2)(A) of the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, the Office of the E:\FR\FM\12DEN1.SGM 12DEN1

Agencies

[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 237 (Monday, December 12, 2005)]
[Notices]
[Pages 73452-73453]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E5-7245]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION

[Investigation Nos. 731-TA-540 and 541 (Second Review)]


Certain Welded Stainless Steel Pipe From Korea and Taiwan

AGENCY: United States International Trade Commission.

ACTION: Notice of Commission determination to conduct full five-year 
reviews concerning the antidumping duty orders on certain welded 
stainless steel pipe from Korea and Taiwan.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Commission hereby gives notice that it will proceed with 
full reviews pursuant to section 751(c)(5) of the Tariff Act of 1930 
(19 U.S.C. 1675(c)(5)) to determine whether revocation of the 
antidumping duty orders on certain welded stainless steel pipe from 
Korea and Taiwan would be likely to lead to continuation or recurrence 
of material injury within a reasonably foreseeable time. A schedule for 
the reviews will be established and announced at a later date. For 
further information concerning the conduct of these reviews and rules 
of general application, consult the Commission's Rules of Practice and 
Procedure, part 201, subparts A through E (19 CFR part 201), and part 
207, subparts A, D, E, and F (19 CFR part 207).

EFFECTIVE DATE: December 5, 2005.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mary Messer (202-205-3193), Office of 
Investigations, U.S. International Trade Commission, 500 E Street, SW., 
Washington, DC 20436. Hearing-

[[Page 73453]]

impaired persons can obtain information on this matter by contacting 
the Commission's TDD terminal on 202-205-1810. Persons with mobility 
impairments who will need special assistance in gaining access to the 
Commission should contact the Office of the Secretary at 202-205-2000. 
General information concerning the Commission may also be obtained by 
accessing its Internet server (http://www.usitc.gov). The public record 
for these reviews may be viewed on the Commission's electronic docket 
(EDIS) at http://edis.usitc.gov.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On December 5, 2005, the Commission 
determined that it should proceed to full reviews in the subject five-
year reviews pursuant to section 751(c)(5) of the Act. The Commission 
found that the domestic interested party group response to its notice 
of institution (70 FR 52124, September 1, 2005) was adequate but that 
the respondent interested party group response was inadequate. However, 
the Commission found that other circumstances warranted conducting full 
reviews.\1\ A record of the Commissioners' votes, the Commission's 
statement on adequacy, and any individual Commissioner's statements 
will be available from the Office of the Secretary and at the 
Commission's Web site.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ Chairman Stephen Koplan and Commissioners Jennifer A. 
Hillman and Shara L. Aranoff dissenting.

    Authority: These reviews are being conducted under authority of 
title VII of the Tariff Act of 1930; this notice is published 
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
pursuant to section 207.62 of the Commission's rules.

    Issued: December 7, 2005.

    By order of the Commission.
Marilyn R. Abbott,
Secretary to the Commission.
 [FR Doc. E5-7245 Filed 12-9-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7020-02-P