In the Matter of Certain High-Brightness Light Emitting Diodes and Products Containing Same; Notice of Investigation, 73026-73027 [E5-7076]
Download as PDF
73026
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 235 / Thursday, December 8, 2005 / Notices
Polytetrafluoroethylene Resin from Italy
and Japan: Investigation Nos. 731–TA–
385 and 386 (Second Review).
Total Annual Responses: 905.
Total Annual Burden Hours: 8,218.
Total Annual Non-Hour Burden
Costs: $1,456.
November 30, 2005.
John R. Craynon,
Chief, Division of Regulatory Support.
[FR Doc. 05–23786 Filed 12–8–05; 8:45 am]
Issued: December 2, 2005.
By order of the Commission.
Marilyn R. Abbott,
Secretary to the Commission.
[FR Doc. E5–7024 Filed 12–7–05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310–05–M
BILLING CODE 7020–02–P
INTERNATIONAL TRADE
COMMISSION
INTERNATIONAL TRADE
COMMISSION
[Investigation Nos. 731–TA–385 and 386
(Second Review)]
[Inv. No. 337–TA–556]
Granular Polytetrafluoroethylene Resin
From Italy and Japan
In the Matter of Certain HighBrightness Light Emitting Diodes and
Products Containing Same; Notice of
Investigation
Determinations
On the basis of the record 1 developed
in these subject five-year reviews, the
United States International Trade
Commission (Commission) determines,
pursuant to section 751(c) of the Tariff
Act of 1930 (19 U.S.C. 1675(c)) (the
Act), that revocation of the antidumping
duty orders on granular
polytetrafluoroethylene resin from Italy
and Japan would be likely to lead to
continuation or recurrence of material
injury to an industry in the United
States within a reasonably foreseeable
time.2
Background
On December 1, 2004, the
Commission determined that responses
to its notice of institution of the subject
five-year reviews were such that full
reviews pursuant to section 751(c)(5) of
the Act should proceed (69 FR 69954,
December 1, 2004). Notice of the
scheduling of the Commission’s reviews
and of a public hearing to be held in
connection therewith was given by
posting copies of the notice in the Office
of the Secretary, U.S. International
Trade Commission, Washington, DC,
and by publishing the notice in the
Federal Register on May 4, 2005 (70 FR
24613). The hearing was held in
Washington, DC, on October 25, 2005,
and all persons who requested the
opportunity were permitted to appear in
person or by counsel.
The Commission transmitted its
determinations in these reviews to the
Secretary of Commerce on December 13,
2005. The views of the Commission are
contained in USITC Publication 3823
(December 2005), entitled Granular
1 The record is defined in sec. 207.2(f) of the
Commission’s Rules of Practice and Procedure (19
CFR 207.2(f)).
2 Vice Chairman Deanna Tanner Okun and
Commissioner Daniel R. Pearson dissent with
regard to the determination concerning Japan.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:29 Dec 07, 2005
Jkt 208001
U.S. International Trade
Commission.
ACTION: Institution of investigation
pursuant to 19 U.S.C. 1337.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that a
complaint was filed with the U.S.
International Trade Commission on
November 4, 2005, under section 337 of
the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, 19
U.S.C. 1337, on behalf of Lumileds
Lighting U.S., LLC of San Jose,
California. A supplemental letter was
filed on November 23, 2005. The
complaint alleges violations of section
337 in the importation into the United
States, the sale for importation, and the
sale within the United States after
importation of certain high-brightness
light emitting diodes and products
containing same by reason of
infringement of claims 1 and 6 of U.S.
Patent No. 5,008,718, claims 1–3, 8–9,
16, 18, and 23–28 of U.S. Patent No.
5,376,580, and claims 12–16 of U.S.
Patent No. 5,502,316. The complaint
further alleges that an industry in the
United States exists as required by
subsection (a)(2) of section 337.
The complainant requests that the
Commission institute an investigation
and, after the investigation, issue a
permanent limited exclusion order and
permanent cease and desist orders.
ADDRESSES: The complaint, except for
any confidential information contained
therein, is available for inspection
during official business hours (8:45 a.m.
to 5:15 p.m.) in the Office of the
Secretary, U.S. International Trade
Commission, 500 E Street, SW., Room
112, Washington, DC 20436, telephone
202–205–2000. Hearing impaired
individuals are advised that information
on this matter can be obtained by
contacting the Commission’s TDD
terminal on 202–205–1810. Persons
with mobility impairments who will
PO 00000
Frm 00050
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
need special assistance in gaining access
to the Commission should contact the
Office of the Secretary at 202–205–2000.
General information concerning the
Commission may also be obtained by
accessing its Internet server at https://
www.usitc.gov. The public record for
this investigation may be viewed on the
Commission’s electronic docket (EDIS)
at https://edis.usitc.gov.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Thomas S. Fusco, Esq., Office of Unfair
Import Investigations, U.S. International
Trade Commission, telephone 202–205–
2571.
Authority: The authority for institution of
this investigation is contained in section 337
of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, and
in section 210.10 of the Commission’s Rules
of Practice and Procedure, 19 CFR 210.10
(2005).
Scope of Investigation: Having
considered the complaint, the U.S.
International Trade Commission, on
December 1, 2005, Ordered that—
(1) Pursuant to subsection (b) of
section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as
amended, an investigation be instituted
to determine whether there is a
violation of subsection (a)(1)(B) of
section 337 in the importation into the
United States, the sale for importation,
or the sale within the United States after
importation of certain high-brightness
light emitting diodes or products
containing same by reason of
infringement of one or more of claims 1
and 6 of U.S. Patent No. 5,008,718,
claims 1–3, 8–9, 16, 18, and 23–28 of
U.S. Patent No. 5,376,580, and claims
12–16 of U.S. Patent No. 5,502,316, and
whether an industry in the United
States exists as required by subsection
(a)(2) of section 337.
(2) For the purpose of the
investigation so instituted, the following
are hereby named as parties upon which
this notice of investigation shall be
served:
(a) The complainant is—Lumileds
Lighting U.S., LLC, 370 West Trimble
Road, San Jose, CA 95131.
(b) The respondents are the following
entities alleged to be in violation of
section 337, and are the parties upon
which the complaint is to be served:
Epistar Corporation, 5 Li-Hsin 5th Road,
Science-Based Industrial Park, Hsinchu,
Taiwan. United Epitaxy Company, 9F,
No. 10, Li-Hsin Road, Science-Based
Industrial Park, Hsinchu, Taiwan.
(c) Thomas S. Fusco, Esq., Office of
Unfair Import Investigations, U.S.
International Trade Commission, 500 E
Street, SW., Suite 401, Washington, DC
20436, who shall be the Commission
investigative attorney, party to this
investigation; and
E:\FR\FM\08DEN1.SGM
08DEN1
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 235 / Thursday, December 8, 2005 / Notices
(3) For the investigation so instituted,
the Honorable Sidney Harris is
designated as the presiding
administrative law judge.
Responses to the complaint and the
notice of investigation must be
submitted by the named respondents in
accordance with section 210.13 of the
Commission’s Rules of Practice and
Procedure, 19 CFR 210.13. Pursuant to
19 CFR 201.16(d) and 210.13(a), such
responses will be considered by the
Commission if received not later than 20
days after the date of service by the
Commission of the complaint and the
notice of investigation. Extensions of
time for submitting responses to the
complaint and the notice of
investigation will not be granted unless
good cause therefor is shown.
Failure of a respondent to file a timely
response to each allegation in the
complaint and in this notice may be
deemed to constitute a waiver of the
right to appear and contest the
allegations of the complaint and this
notice, and to authorize the
administrative law judge and the
Commission, without further notice to
the respondents, to find the facts to be
as alleged in the complaint and this
notice and to enter a final determination
containing such findings, and may
result in the issuance of a limited
exclusion order or cease and desist
order or both directed against the
respondent.
By order of the Commission.
Issued: December 2, 2005.
Marilyn R. Abbott,
Secretary to the Commission.
[FR Doc. E5–7076 Filed 12–7–05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7020–02–P
INTERNATIONAL TRADE
COMMISSION
[ Inv. No. 337–TA–519]
In the Matter of Certain Personal
Computers, Monitors, and
Components Thereof; Notice of
Commission Decision to Review-InPart an Initial Determination Finding
No Violation of Section 337 of the Tariff
Act of 1930 and to Remand Portions of
the Investigation to the Administrative
Law Judge
U.S. International Trade
Commission.
ACTION: Notice.
AGENCY:
1. The parties all filed timely responses
to all the petitions
Notice is hereby given that
the U.S. International Trade
Commission has determined to reviewin-part the presiding administrative law
judge’s (‘‘ALJ’s’’) initial determination
SUMMARY:
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:29 Dec 07, 2005
Jkt 208001
(‘‘ID’’) issued on October 6, 2005, in the
above-captioned investigation and to
remand portions of the investigation to
the ALJ to make additional factual
findings and determinations.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Michael Liberman, Esq., Office of the
General Counsel, U.S. International
Trade Commission, 500 E Street, SW.,
Washington, DC 20436, telephone (202)
205–3065. Copies of non-confidential
documents filed in connection with this
investigation are or will be available for
inspection during official business
hours (8:45 a.m. to 5:15 p.m.) in the
Office of the Secretary, U.S.
International Trade Commission, 500 E
Street, SW., Washington, DC 20436,
telephone (202) 205–2000. General
information concerning the Commission
may also be obtained by accessing its
Internet server (https://www.usitc.gov).
The public record for this investigation
may be viewed on the Commission’s
electronic docket (EDIS) at https://
edis.usitc.gov. Hearing-impaired
persons are advised that information on
this matter can be obtained by
contacting the Commission’s TDD
terminal on (202) 205–1810.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This
patent-based section 337 investigation
was instituted by the Commission on
August 6, 2004, based on a complaint
filed by Gateway, Inc. of Poway,
California (‘‘Gateway’’). 69 FR 47956
(August 6, 2004). The complainant
alleged violations of section 337 in the
importation and sale of certain personal
computers, monitors, and components
thereof, by reason of infringement of
three U.S. patents. The complainant
named Hewlett-Packard Company of
Palo Alto, California as a respondent.
Claims 9–11 and 15–19 of U.S. Patent
No. 5,192,999 (‘‘the ‘999 patent’’)
remain at issue in this investigation.
The evidentiary hearing was held
from May 23 through May 26, 2005. On
October 6, 2005, the ALJ issued a final
ID finding no violation of section 337.
All the parties to the investigation,
including the Commission investigative
attorney, filed timely petitions for
review of various portions of the final
ID. Respondent’s petition is contingent
upon a Commission determination to
review the ALJ’s findings on the issue
of inequitable conduct. HP’s Petition at
Having reviewed the record in this
investigation, including the parties’
written submissions, the Commission
has determined to: (1) Review the ALJ’s
determination on induced infringement
of Claim 19 and remand for further
PO 00000
Frm 00051
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
73027
factual findings and analysis; (2) review
the ALJ’s determination on obviousness
solely for the purpose of clarifying the
ID’s discussion of Sakraida v. AG Pro,
Inc., 425 U.S. 273 (1976); (3) review the
ALJ’s determination on enablement; and
(4) review the issue of inequitable
conduct and remand for further factual
findings and analysis. The Commission
has further determined not to review the
remainder of the ID.
Written Submissions: The
Commission does not request any
written submissions at this time.
This action is taken under the
authority of section 337 of the Tariff Act
of 1930, as amended (19 U.S.C. 1337),
and in sections 210.42–.45 of the
Commission’s Rules of Practice and
Procedure (19 CFR 210.42–.45).
Issued: December 1, 2005.
By order of the Commission.
Marilyn R. Abbott,
Secretary to the Commission.
[FR Doc. E5–7026 Filed 12–7–05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7020–02–P
INTERNATIONAL TRADE
COMMISSION
[Investigation No. 731–TA–860 (Review)]
Tin- and Chromium-Coated Steel Sheet
From Japan
United States International
Trade Commission.
ACTION: Scheduling of a full five-year
review concerning the antidumping
duty order on tin- and chromium-coated
steel sheet from Japan.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: The Commission hereby gives
notice of the scheduling of a full review
pursuant to section 751(c)(5) of the
Tariff Act of 1930 (19 U.S.C. 1675(c)(5))
(the Act) to determine whether
revocation of the antidumping duty
order on tin- and chromium-coated steel
sheet from Japan would be likely to lead
to continuation or recurrence of material
injury within a reasonably foreseeable
time. For further information
concerning the conduct of this review
and rules of general application, consult
the Commission’s Rules of Practice and
Procedure, part 201, subparts A through
E (19 CFR part 201), and part 207,
subparts A, D, E, and F (19 CFR part
207).
EFFECTIVE DATE: December 2, 2005.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Olympia DeRosa Hand (202–205–3182)
or Douglas Corkran (202–205–3057),
Office of Investigations, U.S.
International Trade Commission, 500 E
Street SW., Washington, DC 20436.
Hearing-impaired persons can obtain
E:\FR\FM\08DEN1.SGM
08DEN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 235 (Thursday, December 8, 2005)]
[Notices]
[Pages 73026-73027]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E5-7076]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION
[Inv. No. 337-TA-556]
In the Matter of Certain High-Brightness Light Emitting Diodes
and Products Containing Same; Notice of Investigation
AGENCY: U.S. International Trade Commission.
ACTION: Institution of investigation pursuant to 19 U.S.C. 1337.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that a complaint was filed with the
U.S. International Trade Commission on November 4, 2005, under section
337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, 19 U.S.C. 1337, on behalf of
Lumileds Lighting U.S., LLC of San Jose, California. A supplemental
letter was filed on November 23, 2005. The complaint alleges violations
of section 337 in the importation into the United States, the sale for
importation, and the sale within the United States after importation of
certain high-brightness light emitting diodes and products containing
same by reason of infringement of claims 1 and 6 of U.S. Patent No.
5,008,718, claims 1-3, 8-9, 16, 18, and 23-28 of U.S. Patent No.
5,376,580, and claims 12-16 of U.S. Patent No. 5,502,316. The complaint
further alleges that an industry in the United States exists as
required by subsection (a)(2) of section 337.
The complainant requests that the Commission institute an
investigation and, after the investigation, issue a permanent limited
exclusion order and permanent cease and desist orders.
ADDRESSES: The complaint, except for any confidential information
contained therein, is available for inspection during official business
hours (8:45 a.m. to 5:15 p.m.) in the Office of the Secretary, U.S.
International Trade Commission, 500 E Street, SW., Room 112,
Washington, DC 20436, telephone 202-205-2000. Hearing impaired
individuals are advised that information on this matter can be obtained
by contacting the Commission's TDD terminal on 202-205-1810. Persons
with mobility impairments who will need special assistance in gaining
access to the Commission should contact the Office of the Secretary at
202-205-2000. General information concerning the Commission may also be
obtained by accessing its Internet server at https://www.usitc.gov. The
public record for this investigation may be viewed on the Commission's
electronic docket (EDIS) at https://edis.usitc.gov.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Thomas S. Fusco, Esq., Office of
Unfair Import Investigations, U.S. International Trade Commission,
telephone 202-205-2571.
Authority: The authority for institution of this investigation
is contained in section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended,
and in section 210.10 of the Commission's Rules of Practice and
Procedure, 19 CFR 210.10 (2005).
Scope of Investigation: Having considered the complaint, the U.S.
International Trade Commission, on December 1, 2005, Ordered that--
(1) Pursuant to subsection (b) of section 337 of the Tariff Act of
1930, as amended, an investigation be instituted to determine whether
there is a violation of subsection (a)(1)(B) of section 337 in the
importation into the United States, the sale for importation, or the
sale within the United States after importation of certain high-
brightness light emitting diodes or products containing same by reason
of infringement of one or more of claims 1 and 6 of U.S. Patent No.
5,008,718, claims 1-3, 8-9, 16, 18, and 23-28 of U.S. Patent No.
5,376,580, and claims 12-16 of U.S. Patent No. 5,502,316, and whether
an industry in the United States exists as required by subsection
(a)(2) of section 337.
(2) For the purpose of the investigation so instituted, the
following are hereby named as parties upon which this notice of
investigation shall be served:
(a) The complainant is--Lumileds Lighting U.S., LLC, 370 West
Trimble Road, San Jose, CA 95131.
(b) The respondents are the following entities alleged to be in
violation of section 337, and are the parties upon which the complaint
is to be served: Epistar Corporation, 5 Li-Hsin 5th Road, Science-Based
Industrial Park, Hsinchu, Taiwan. United Epitaxy Company, 9F, No. 10,
Li-Hsin Road, Science-Based Industrial Park, Hsinchu, Taiwan.
(c) Thomas S. Fusco, Esq., Office of Unfair Import Investigations,
U.S. International Trade Commission, 500 E Street, SW., Suite 401,
Washington, DC 20436, who shall be the Commission investigative
attorney, party to this investigation; and
[[Page 73027]]
(3) For the investigation so instituted, the Honorable Sidney
Harris is designated as the presiding administrative law judge.
Responses to the complaint and the notice of investigation must be
submitted by the named respondents in accordance with section 210.13 of
the Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure, 19 CFR 210.13.
Pursuant to 19 CFR 201.16(d) and 210.13(a), such responses will be
considered by the Commission if received not later than 20 days after
the date of service by the Commission of the complaint and the notice
of investigation. Extensions of time for submitting responses to the
complaint and the notice of investigation will not be granted unless
good cause therefor is shown.
Failure of a respondent to file a timely response to each
allegation in the complaint and in this notice may be deemed to
constitute a waiver of the right to appear and contest the allegations
of the complaint and this notice, and to authorize the administrative
law judge and the Commission, without further notice to the
respondents, to find the facts to be as alleged in the complaint and
this notice and to enter a final determination containing such
findings, and may result in the issuance of a limited exclusion order
or cease and desist order or both directed against the respondent.
By order of the Commission.
Issued: December 2, 2005.
Marilyn R. Abbott,
Secretary to the Commission.
[FR Doc. E5-7076 Filed 12-7-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7020-02-P