Granular Polytetrafluoroethylene Resin From Italy and Japan, 73026 [E5-7024]
Download as PDF
<![CDATA[
73026
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 235 / Thursday, December 8, 2005 / Notices
Polytetrafluoroethylene Resin from Italy
and Japan: Investigation Nos. 731–TA–
385 and 386 (Second Review).
Total Annual Responses: 905.
Total Annual Burden Hours: 8,218.
Total Annual Non-Hour Burden
Costs: $1,456.
November 30, 2005.
John R. Craynon,
Chief, Division of Regulatory Support.
[FR Doc. 05–23786 Filed 12–8–05; 8:45 am]
Issued: December 2, 2005.
By order of the Commission.
Marilyn R. Abbott,
Secretary to the Commission.
[FR Doc. E5–7024 Filed 12–7–05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310–05–M
BILLING CODE 7020–02–P
INTERNATIONAL TRADE
COMMISSION
INTERNATIONAL TRADE
COMMISSION
[Investigation Nos. 731–TA–385 and 386
(Second Review)]
[Inv. No. 337–TA–556]
Granular Polytetrafluoroethylene Resin
From Italy and Japan
In the Matter of Certain HighBrightness Light Emitting Diodes and
Products Containing Same; Notice of
Investigation
Determinations
On the basis of the record 1 developed
in these subject five-year reviews, the
United States International Trade
Commission (Commission) determines,
pursuant to section 751(c) of the Tariff
Act of 1930 (19 U.S.C. 1675(c)) (the
Act), that revocation of the antidumping
duty orders on granular
polytetrafluoroethylene resin from Italy
and Japan would be likely to lead to
continuation or recurrence of material
injury to an industry in the United
States within a reasonably foreseeable
time.2
Background
On December 1, 2004, the
Commission determined that responses
to its notice of institution of the subject
five-year reviews were such that full
reviews pursuant to section 751(c)(5) of
the Act should proceed (69 FR 69954,
December 1, 2004). Notice of the
scheduling of the Commission’s reviews
and of a public hearing to be held in
connection therewith was given by
posting copies of the notice in the Office
of the Secretary, U.S. International
Trade Commission, Washington, DC,
and by publishing the notice in the
Federal Register on May 4, 2005 (70 FR
24613). The hearing was held in
Washington, DC, on October 25, 2005,
and all persons who requested the
opportunity were permitted to appear in
person or by counsel.
The Commission transmitted its
determinations in these reviews to the
Secretary of Commerce on December 13,
2005. The views of the Commission are
contained in USITC Publication 3823
(December 2005), entitled Granular
1 The record is defined in sec. 207.2(f) of the
Commission’s Rules of Practice and Procedure (19
CFR 207.2(f)).
2 Vice Chairman Deanna Tanner Okun and
Commissioner Daniel R. Pearson dissent with
regard to the determination concerning Japan.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:29 Dec 07, 2005
Jkt 208001
U.S. International Trade
Commission.
ACTION: Institution of investigation
pursuant to 19 U.S.C. 1337.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that a
complaint was filed with the U.S.
International Trade Commission on
November 4, 2005, under section 337 of
the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, 19
U.S.C. 1337, on behalf of Lumileds
Lighting U.S., LLC of San Jose,
California. A supplemental letter was
filed on November 23, 2005. The
complaint alleges violations of section
337 in the importation into the United
States, the sale for importation, and the
sale within the United States after
importation of certain high-brightness
light emitting diodes and products
containing same by reason of
infringement of claims 1 and 6 of U.S.
Patent No. 5,008,718, claims 1–3, 8–9,
16, 18, and 23–28 of U.S. Patent No.
5,376,580, and claims 12–16 of U.S.
Patent No. 5,502,316. The complaint
further alleges that an industry in the
United States exists as required by
subsection (a)(2) of section 337.
The complainant requests that the
Commission institute an investigation
and, after the investigation, issue a
permanent limited exclusion order and
permanent cease and desist orders.
ADDRESSES: The complaint, except for
any confidential information contained
therein, is available for inspection
during official business hours (8:45 a.m.
to 5:15 p.m.) in the Office of the
Secretary, U.S. International Trade
Commission, 500 E Street, SW., Room
112, Washington, DC 20436, telephone
202–205–2000. Hearing impaired
individuals are advised that information
on this matter can be obtained by
contacting the Commission’s TDD
terminal on 202–205–1810. Persons
with mobility impairments who will
PO 00000
Frm 00050
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
need special assistance in gaining access
to the Commission should contact the
Office of the Secretary at 202–205–2000.
General information concerning the
Commission may also be obtained by
accessing its Internet server at https://
www.usitc.gov. The public record for
this investigation may be viewed on the
Commission’s electronic docket (EDIS)
at https://edis.usitc.gov.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Thomas S. Fusco, Esq., Office of Unfair
Import Investigations, U.S. International
Trade Commission, telephone 202–205–
2571.
Authority: The authority for institution of
this investigation is contained in section 337
of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, and
in section 210.10 of the Commission’s Rules
of Practice and Procedure, 19 CFR 210.10
(2005).
Scope of Investigation: Having
considered the complaint, the U.S.
International Trade Commission, on
December 1, 2005, Ordered that—
(1) Pursuant to subsection (b) of
section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as
amended, an investigation be instituted
to determine whether there is a
violation of subsection (a)(1)(B) of
section 337 in the importation into the
United States, the sale for importation,
or the sale within the United States after
importation of certain high-brightness
light emitting diodes or products
containing same by reason of
infringement of one or more of claims 1
and 6 of U.S. Patent No. 5,008,718,
claims 1–3, 8–9, 16, 18, and 23–28 of
U.S. Patent No. 5,376,580, and claims
12–16 of U.S. Patent No. 5,502,316, and
whether an industry in the United
States exists as required by subsection
(a)(2) of section 337.
(2) For the purpose of the
investigation so instituted, the following
are hereby named as parties upon which
this notice of investigation shall be
served:
(a) The complainant is—Lumileds
Lighting U.S., LLC, 370 West Trimble
Road, San Jose, CA 95131.
(b) The respondents are the following
entities alleged to be in violation of
section 337, and are the parties upon
which the complaint is to be served:
Epistar Corporation, 5 Li-Hsin 5th Road,
Science-Based Industrial Park, Hsinchu,
Taiwan. United Epitaxy Company, 9F,
No. 10, Li-Hsin Road, Science-Based
Industrial Park, Hsinchu, Taiwan.
(c) Thomas S. Fusco, Esq., Office of
Unfair Import Investigations, U.S.
International Trade Commission, 500 E
Street, SW., Suite 401, Washington, DC
20436, who shall be the Commission
investigative attorney, party to this
investigation; and
E:\FR\FM\08DEN1.SGM
08DEN1
]]>Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 235 (Thursday, December 8, 2005)]
[Notices]
[Page 73026]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E5-7024]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION
[Investigation Nos. 731-TA-385 and 386 (Second Review)]
Granular Polytetrafluoroethylene Resin From Italy and Japan
Determinations
On the basis of the record \1\ developed in these subject five-year
reviews, the United States International Trade Commission (Commission)
determines, pursuant to section 751(c) of the Tariff Act of 1930 (19
U.S.C. 1675(c)) (the Act), that revocation of the antidumping duty
orders on granular polytetrafluoroethylene resin from Italy and Japan
would be likely to lead to continuation or recurrence of material
injury to an industry in the United States within a reasonably
foreseeable time.\2\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ The record is defined in sec. 207.2(f) of the Commission's
Rules of Practice and Procedure (19 CFR 207.2(f)).
\2\ Vice Chairman Deanna Tanner Okun and Commissioner Daniel R.
Pearson dissent with regard to the determination concerning Japan.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Background
On December 1, 2004, the Commission determined that responses to
its notice of institution of the subject five-year reviews were such
that full reviews pursuant to section 751(c)(5) of the Act should
proceed (69 FR 69954, December 1, 2004). Notice of the scheduling of
the Commission's reviews and of a public hearing to be held in
connection therewith was given by posting copies of the notice in the
Office of the Secretary, U.S. International Trade Commission,
Washington, DC, and by publishing the notice in the Federal Register on
May 4, 2005 (70 FR 24613). The hearing was held in Washington, DC, on
October 25, 2005, and all persons who requested the opportunity were
permitted to appear in person or by counsel.
The Commission transmitted its determinations in these reviews to
the Secretary of Commerce on December 13, 2005. The views of the
Commission are contained in USITC Publication 3823 (December 2005),
entitled Granular Polytetrafluoroethylene Resin from Italy and Japan:
Investigation Nos. 731-TA-385 and 386 (Second Review).
Issued: December 2, 2005.
By order of the Commission.
Marilyn R. Abbott,
Secretary to the Commission.
[FR Doc. E5-7024 Filed 12-7-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7020-02-P
