Notice of Determinations Regarding Eligibility To Apply for Worker Adjustment Assistance, 72652-72654 [E5-6874]
Download as PDF
<![CDATA[
72652
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 233 / Tuesday, December 6, 2005 / Notices
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
INTERNATIONAL TRADE
COMMISSION
Bureau of Reclamation
[Investigation No. 731–TA–669 (Second
Review)]
San Luis Unit Long-Term Contract
Renewal
Cased Pencils From China
AGENCY:
Bureau of Reclamation,
Extension of comment period
for review of Draft Environmental
Impact Statement (DEIS).
ACTION:
The Bureau of Reclamation is
extending the comment period for the
DEIS to January 17, 2006. The notice of
availability of the DEIS and notice of
public workshop and notice of public
hearings was published in the Federal
Register on September 30, 2005 (70 FR
57324). The public comment period was
originally to end on November 21, 2005.
SUMMARY:
Submit comments on the DEIS
on or before January 17, 2006.
DATES:
Send comments on the DEIS
to Mr. Shane Hunt, Bureau of
Reclamation, South-Central California
Area Office, 1243 N Street, Fresno, CA
93721. Comments may also be e-mailed
to shunt@mp.usbr.gov. Copies of the
DEIS may be requested by calling Mr.
Hunt at 559–487–5138, TDD 559–487–
5933.
ADDRESSES:
Mr.
Shane Hunt at 559–487–5138, TDD 559–
487–5933.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Our
practice is to make comments, including
names and home addresses of
respondents, available for public
review. Individual respondents may
request that we withhold their home
address from public disclosure, which
we will honor to the extent allowable by
law. There also may be circumstances in
which we would withhold a
respondent’s identity from public
disclosure, as allowable by law. If you
wish us to withhold your name and/or
address, you must state this
prominently at the beginning of your
comment. We will make all submissions
from organizations or businesses, and
from individuals identifying themselves
as representatives or officials of
organizations or businesses, available
for public disclosure in their entirety.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Dated: November 29, 2005.
Michael Nepstad,
Deputy Regional Environmental Officer, MidPacific Region.
[FR Doc. E5–6871 Filed 12–5–05; 8:45 am]
VerDate Aug<31>2005
17:44 Dec 05, 2005
Jkt 205001
BILLING CODE 4510–30–P
Determination
Interior.
BILLING CODE 4310–MN–P
Signed at Washington, DC, this 16th day of
November 2005.
Elliott S. Kushner,
Certifying Officer, Division of Trade
Adjustment Assistance.
[FR Doc. E5–6878 Filed 12–5–05; 8:45 am]
On the basis of the record 1 developed
in the subject five-year review, the
United States International Trade
Commission (Commission) determines,
pursuant to section 751(c) of the Tariff
Act of 1930 (19 U.S.C. 1675(c)) (the
Act), that revocation of the antidumping
duty order on cased pencils from China
would be likely to lead to continuation
or recurrence of material injury to an
industry in the United States within a
reasonably foreseeable time.
Background
The Commission instituted this
review on July 1, 2005 (70 FR 38192)
and determined on October 4, 2005 that
it would conduct an expedited review
(70 FR 60557, October 18, 2005).
The Commission transmitted its
determination in this review to the
Secretary of Commerce on November
30, 2005. The views of the Commission
are contained in USITC Publication
3820 (November 2005), entitled Cased
Pencils from China: Investigation No.
731–TA–669 (Second Review).
Issued: November 30, 2005.
By order of the Commission.
Marilyn R. Abbott,
Secretary to the Commission.
[FR Doc. E5–6895 Filed 12–6–05; 8:45 am]
DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
Employment and Training
Administration
[TA–W–58,119]
Cole Hersee Company, South Boston,
MA; Notice of Termination of
Investigation
Pursuant to Section 221 of the Trade
Act of 1974, as amended, an
investigation was initiated on October
12, 2005 in response to a petition filed
by a company official on behalf of
workers of Cole Hersee Company, South
Boston, Massachusetts.
The petitioner has requested that the
petition be withdrawn. Consequently,
the investigation has been terminated.
Signed at Washington, DC, this 18th day of
November 2005.
Linda G. Poole,
Certifying Officer, Division of Trade
Adjustment Assistance.
[FR Doc. E5–6875 Filed 12–5–05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510–30–P
DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
Employment and Training
Administration
BILLING CODE 7020–02–P
Notice of Determinations Regarding
Eligibility To Apply for Worker
Adjustment Assistance
DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
Employment and Training
Administration
[TA–W–58,280]
TRW Jackson, MI; Notice of
Termination of Investigation
Pursuant to section 221 of the Trade
Act of 1974, as amended, an
investigation was initiated on November
4, 2005, in response to a worker petition
filed by the United Steelworkers of
America, Local 2–670, on behalf of
workers at TRW, Jackson, Michigan.
The petitioner has requested that the
petition be withdrawn. Consequently,
the investigation has been terminated.
1 The record is defined in sec. 207.2(f) of the
Commission’s Rules of Practice and Procedure (19
CFR 207.2(f)).
PO 00000
Frm 00048
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
In accordance with Section 223 of the
Trade Act of 1974, as amended, (19
U.S.C. 2273), the Department of Labor
herein presents summaries of
determinations regarding eligibility to
apply for trade adjustment assistance for
workers (TA–W) number and alternative
trade adjustment assistance (ATAA) by
(TA–W) number issued during the
periods of November 2005.
In order for an affirmative
determination to be made and a
certification of eligibility to apply for
directly-impacted (primary) worker
adjustment assistance to be issued, each
of the group eligibility requirements of
Section 222(a) of the Act must be met.
I. Section (a)(2)(A) all of the following
must be satisfied:
A. A significant number or proportion
of the workers in such workers’ firm, or
an appropriate subdivision of the firm,
E:\FR\FM\06DEN1.SGM
06DEN1
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 233 / Tuesday, December 6, 2005 / Notices
have become totally or partially
separated, or are threatened to become
totally or partially separated;
B. The sales or production, or both, of
such firm or subdivision have decreased
absolutely; and
C. Increased imports of articles like or
directly competitive with articles
produced by such firm or subdivision
have contributed importantly to such
workers’ separation or threat of
separation and to the decline in sales or
production of such firm or subdivision;
or
II. Section (a)(2)(B) both of the
following must be satisfied:
A. A significant number or proportion
of the workers in such workers’ firm, or
an appropriate subdivision of the firm,
have become totally or partially
separated, or are threatened to become
totally or partially separated;
B. There has been a shift in
production by such workers’ firm or
subdivision to a foreign country of
articles like or directly competitive with
articles which are produced by such
firm or subdivision; and
C. One of the following must be
satisfied:
1. The country to which the workers’
firm has shifted production of the
articles is a party to a free trade
agreement with the United States;
2. The country to which the workers’
firm has shifted production of the
articles to a beneficiary country under
the Andean Trade Preference Act,
African Growth and Opportunity Act, or
the Caribbean Basin Economic Recovery
Act; or
3. There has been or is likely to be an
increase in imports of articles that are
like or directly competitive with articles
which are or were produced by such
firm or subdivision.
Also, in order for an affirmative
determination to be made and a
certification of eligibility to apply for
worker adjustment assistance as an
adversely affected secondary group to be
issued, each of the group eligibility
requirements of Section 222(b) of the
Act must be met.
(1) Significant number or proportion
of the workers in the workers’ firm or
an appropriate subdivision of the firm
have become totally or partially
separated, or are threatened to become
totally or partially separated;
(2) The workers’ firm (or subdivision)
is a supplier or downstream producer to
a firm (or subdivision) that employed a
group of workers who received a
certification of eligibility to apply for
trade adjustment assistance benefits and
such supply or production is related to
the article that was the basis for such
certification; and
VerDate Aug<31>2005
17:44 Dec 05, 2005
Jkt 205001
(3) either—
(A) The workers’ firm is a supplier
and the component parts it supplied for
the firm (or subdivision) described in
paragraph (2) accounted for at least 20
percent of the production or sales of the
workers’ firm; or
(B) A loss or business by the workers’
firm with the firm (or subdivision)
described in paragraph (2) contributed
importantly to the workers’ separation
or threat of separation.
Negative Determinations for Worker
Adjustment Assistance
In the following cases, the
investigation revealed that the criteria
for eligibility have not been met for the
reasons specified.
The investigation revealed that
criteria (a)(2)(A)(I.C.) (increased
imports) and (a)(2)(B)(II.B) (No shift in
production to a foreign country) have
not been met.
TA–W–58,031; ComTal Machine and
Engineering, White Bear Township,
MN.
TA–W–58,047; Plasti-Coil, Inc., Lake
Geneva, WI.
TA–W–58,061; Atfab Company,
Painesville, OH.
The investigation revealed that
criteria (a)(2)(A)(I.B.) (Sales or
production, or both, did not decline)
and (a)(2)(B)(II.B) (No shift in
production to a foreign country) have
not been met.
TA–W–58,140; Samuel Son and
Company, Detroit, MI.
The investigation revealed that
criterion (a)(2)(A)(I.A) and (a)(2)(B)(II.A)
(no employment decline) has not been
met.
TA–W–58,107; Century Furniture
Industries, Case Goods Division,
Hickory, NC.
The workers firm does not produce an
article as required for certification under
Section 222 of the Trade Act of 1974.
TA–W–58,066; Agere Systems, Inc.,
Allentown, PA.
TA–W–58,117; George Weston Bakeries,
Accounts Payable Department, Bay
Shore, NY.
TA–W–58,270; UTI Integrated Logistics,
d/b/a Standard Corp., Greenville,
SC.
TA–W–58,272; Sun Shade Holding, El
Cerrito, CA.
The investigation revealed that
criteria (a)(2)(A)(I.C.) (Increased imports
and (a)(2)(B) (II.C) (has shifted
production to a foreign country) have
not been met.
None
The investigation revealed that
criteria (2) has not been met. The
PO 00000
Frm 00049
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
72653
workers firm (or subdivision) is not a
supplier or downstream producer to
trade-affected companies.
TA–W–58,071; EEEA, Inc., Mauldin, SC.
Affirmative Determinations for Worker
Adjustment Assistance
The following certifications have been
issued; the date following the company
name and location of each
determination references the impact
date for all workers of such
determination.
The following certifications have been
issued. The requirements of (a)(2)(A)
(increased imports) of Section 222 have
been met.
TA–W–58,034; Highland Mills, Inc.,
Charlotte, NC: September 26, 2004.
TA–W–58,051; Miker Companies,
Cheektowaga, NY: September 22,
2004.
TA–W–58,056; Neilsen Manufacturing,
Inc., Salem, OR: September 30,
2004.
TA–W–58,076; T P Corporation, Duryea,
PA: October 5, 2004.
TA–W–58,142; Vishay Roederstein
Electronics, Inc., Statesville, NC:
October 13, 2004.
TA–W–58,162; Style Setter Fashions,
Inc., Philadelphia, PA: June 7, 2005.
The following certifications have been
issued. The requirements of (a)(2)(B)
(shift in production) of Section 222 have
been met.
TA–W–58,020; Southwest Corset
Corporation, Trading as Southwest
Cupid, Access Employer, Blackwell,
OK: September 1, 2004.
TA–W–58,075; Paxar Americas, Inc.,
Paxar Corporation, Sayre, PA:
October 4, 2004.
TA–W–58,153; Druck, Inc., a/k/a GE
Sensing, Adecco, Viking
Accountemps, New Fairfield, CT:
October 17, 2004.
TA–W–58,157; High Cotton Enterprises,
Inc., Seaming Department, Fort
Payne, AL: October 7, 2004.
The following certification has been
issued. The requirement of supplier to
a trade certified firm has been met.
TA–W–58,260; Gemtron Corp.,
Manpower, Holland, MI: November
2, 2004.
The following certification has been
issued. The requirement of downstream
producer to a trade certified firm has
been met.
None
Negative Determinations for Alternative
Trade Adjustment Assistance
In order for the Division of Trade
Adjustment Assistance to issue a
certification of eligibility to apply for
E:\FR\FM\06DEN1.SGM
06DEN1
72654
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 233 / Tuesday, December 6, 2005 / Notices
Alternative Trade Adjustment
Assistance (ATAA) for older workers,
the group eligibility requirements of
Section 246(a)(3)(A)(ii) of the Trade Act
must be met.
In the following cases, it has been
determined that the requirements of
Section 246(a)(3)(ii) have not been met
for the reasons specified.
The Department has determined that
criterion (2) of Section 246 has not been
met. Workers at the firm possess skills
that are easily transferable.
TA–W–58,075; Paxar Americas, Inc.,
Paxar Corporation, Sayre, PA.
The Department has determined that
criterion (1) of Section 246 has not been
met. Workers at the firm are 50 years of
age or older.
None
Since the workers are denied
eligibility to apply for TAA, the workers
cannot be certified eligible for ATAA.
TA–W–58,107; Century Furniture
Industries, Case Goods Division,
Hickory, NC.
TA–W–58,140; Samuel Son and
Company, Detroit, MI.
TA–W–58,031; ComTal Machine and
Engineering, White Bear Township,
MN.
TA–W–58,047; Plasti-Coil, Inc., Lake
Geneva, WI.
TA–W–58,061; Atfab Company,
Painesville, OH.
TA–W–58,066; Agere Systems, Inc.,
Allentown, PA.
TA–W–58,117; George Weston Bakeries,
Accounts Payable Department, Bay
Shore, NY.
TA–W–58,270; UTI Integrated Logistics,
d/b/a Standard Corp., Greenville,
SC.
TA–W–58,272; Sun Shade Holding, El
Cerrito, CA.
TA–W–58,071; EEEA, Inc., Mauldin, SC.
The Department as determined that
criterion (3) of Section 246 has not been
met. Competition conditions within the
workers’ industry are not adverse.
None
Affirmative Determinations for
Alternative Trade Ajdustment
Assistance
In order for the Division of Trade
Adjustment Assistance to issued a
certification of eligibility to apply for
Alternative Trade Adjustment
Assistance (ATAA) for older workers,
the group eligibility requirements of
Section 246(a)(3)(A)(ii) of the Trade Act
must be met.
The following certifications have been
issued; the date following the company
name and location of each
determination references the impact
VerDate Aug<31>2005
17:44 Dec 05, 2005
Jkt 205001
date for all workers of such
determinations.
In the following cases, it has been
determined that the requirements of
Section 246(a)(3)(ii) have been met.
I. Whether a significant number of
workers in the workers’ firm are 50
years of age or older.
II. Whether the workers in the
workers’ firm possess skills that are not
easily transferable.
III. The competitive conditions within
the workers’ industry (i.e., conditions
within the industry are adverse).
TA–W–58,142; Vishay Roederstein
Electronics, Inc., Statesville, NC:
October 13, 2004.
TA–W–58,051; Miker Companies,
Cheektowaga, NY: September 22,
2004.
TA–W–58,056; Neilsen Manufacturing,
Inc., Salem, OR: September 30,
2004.
TA–W–58,076; T P Corporation, Duryea,
PA: October 5, 2004.
TA–W–58,162; Style Setter Fashions,
Inc., Philadelphia, PA: June 7, 2005.
TA–W–58,153; Druck, Inc., a/k/a GE
Sensing, Adecco, Viking
Accountemps, New Fairfield, CT:
October 17, 2004.
TA–W–58,157; High Cotton Enterprises,
Inc., Seaming Department, Fort
Payne, AL: October 7, 2004.
TA–W–58,260; Gemtron Corp.,
Manpower, Holland, MI: November
2, 2004.
I hereby certify that the
aforementioned determinations were
issued during the month of November
2005. Copies of these determinations are
available for inspection in Room C–
5311, U.S. Department of Labor, 200
Constitution Avenue, NW., Washington,
DC 20210 during normal business hours
or will be mailed to persons who write
to the above address.
Dated: November 28, 2005.
Erica R. Cantor,
Director, Division of Trade Adjustment
Assistance.
[FR Doc. E5–6874 Filed 12–5–05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510–30–P
DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
Employment and Training
Administration
Notice of Determinations Regarding
Eligibility To Apply for Worker
Adjustment Assistance
In accordance with Section 223 of the
Trade Act of 1974, as amended, (19
U.S.C. 2273), the Department of Labor
herein presents summaries of
determinations regarding eligibility to
PO 00000
Frm 00050
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
apply for trade adjustment assistance for
workers (TA–W) number and alternative
trade adjustment assistance (ATAA) by
(TA–W) number issued during the
period of November 2005.
In order for an affirmative
determination to be made and a
certification of eligibility to apply for
directly-impacted (primary) worker
adjustment assistance to be issued, each
of the group eligibility requirements of
Section 222(a) of the Act must be met.
I. Section (a)(2)(A) all of the following
must be satisfied:
A. A significant number or proportion
of the workers in such workers’ firm, or
an appropriate subdivision of the firm,
have become totally or partially
separated, or are threatened to become
totally or partially separated;
B. The sales or production, or both, of
such firm or subdivision have decreased
absolutely; and
C. Increased imports of articles like or
directly competitive with articles
produced by such firm or subdivision
have contributed importantly to such
workers’ separation or threat of
separation and to the decline in sales or
production of such firm or subdivision;
or
II. Section (a)(2)(B) both of the
following must be satisfied:
A. A significant number or proportion
of the workers in such workers’ firm, or
an appropriate subdivision of the firm,
have become totally or partially
separated, or are threatened to become
totally or partially separated;
B. There has been a shift in
production by such workers’ firm or
subdivision to a foreign country of
articles like or directly competitive with
articles which are produced by such
firm or subdivision; and
C. One of the following must be
satisfied:
1. The country to which the workers’
firm has shifted production of the
articles is a party to a free trade
agreement with the United States;
2. The country to which the workers’
firm has shifted production of the
articles to a beneficiary country under
the Andean Trade Preference Act,
African Growth and Opportunity Act, or
the Caribbean Basin Economic Recovery
Act; or
3. There has been or is likely to be an
increase in imports of articles that are
like or directly competitive with articles
which are or were produced by such
firm or subdivision.
Also, in order for an affirmative
determination to be made and a
certification of eligibility to apply for
worker adjustment assistance as an
adversely affected secondary group to be
issued, each of the group eligibility
E:\FR\FM\06DEN1.SGM
06DEN1
]]>Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 233 (Tuesday, December 6, 2005)]
[Notices]
[Pages 72652-72654]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E5-6874]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
Employment and Training Administration
Notice of Determinations Regarding Eligibility To Apply for
Worker Adjustment Assistance
In accordance with Section 223 of the Trade Act of 1974, as
amended, (19 U.S.C. 2273), the Department of Labor herein presents
summaries of determinations regarding eligibility to apply for trade
adjustment assistance for workers (TA-W) number and alternative trade
adjustment assistance (ATAA) by (TA-W) number issued during the periods
of November 2005.
In order for an affirmative determination to be made and a
certification of eligibility to apply for directly-impacted (primary)
worker adjustment assistance to be issued, each of the group
eligibility requirements of Section 222(a) of the Act must be met.
I. Section (a)(2)(A) all of the following must be satisfied:
A. A significant number or proportion of the workers in such
workers' firm, or an appropriate subdivision of the firm,
[[Page 72653]]
have become totally or partially separated, or are threatened to become
totally or partially separated;
B. The sales or production, or both, of such firm or subdivision
have decreased absolutely; and
C. Increased imports of articles like or directly competitive with
articles produced by such firm or subdivision have contributed
importantly to such workers' separation or threat of separation and to
the decline in sales or production of such firm or subdivision; or
II. Section (a)(2)(B) both of the following must be satisfied:
A. A significant number or proportion of the workers in such
workers' firm, or an appropriate subdivision of the firm, have become
totally or partially separated, or are threatened to become totally or
partially separated;
B. There has been a shift in production by such workers' firm or
subdivision to a foreign country of articles like or directly
competitive with articles which are produced by such firm or
subdivision; and
C. One of the following must be satisfied:
1. The country to which the workers' firm has shifted production of
the articles is a party to a free trade agreement with the United
States;
2. The country to which the workers' firm has shifted production of
the articles to a beneficiary country under the Andean Trade Preference
Act, African Growth and Opportunity Act, or the Caribbean Basin
Economic Recovery Act; or
3. There has been or is likely to be an increase in imports of
articles that are like or directly competitive with articles which are
or were produced by such firm or subdivision.
Also, in order for an affirmative determination to be made and a
certification of eligibility to apply for worker adjustment assistance
as an adversely affected secondary group to be issued, each of the
group eligibility requirements of Section 222(b) of the Act must be
met.
(1) Significant number or proportion of the workers in the workers'
firm or an appropriate subdivision of the firm have become totally or
partially separated, or are threatened to become totally or partially
separated;
(2) The workers' firm (or subdivision) is a supplier or downstream
producer to a firm (or subdivision) that employed a group of workers
who received a certification of eligibility to apply for trade
adjustment assistance benefits and such supply or production is related
to the article that was the basis for such certification; and
(3) either--
(A) The workers' firm is a supplier and the component parts it
supplied for the firm (or subdivision) described in paragraph (2)
accounted for at least 20 percent of the production or sales of the
workers' firm; or
(B) A loss or business by the workers' firm with the firm (or
subdivision) described in paragraph (2) contributed importantly to the
workers' separation or threat of separation.
Negative Determinations for Worker Adjustment Assistance
In the following cases, the investigation revealed that the
criteria for eligibility have not been met for the reasons specified.
The investigation revealed that criteria (a)(2)(A)(I.C.) (increased
imports) and (a)(2)(B)(II.B) (No shift in production to a foreign
country) have not been met.
TA-W-58,031; ComTal Machine and Engineering, White Bear Township, MN.
TA-W-58,047; Plasti-Coil, Inc., Lake Geneva, WI.
TA-W-58,061; Atfab Company, Painesville, OH.
The investigation revealed that criteria (a)(2)(A)(I.B.) (Sales or
production, or both, did not decline) and (a)(2)(B)(II.B) (No shift in
production to a foreign country) have not been met.
TA-W-58,140; Samuel Son and Company, Detroit, MI.
The investigation revealed that criterion (a)(2)(A)(I.A) and
(a)(2)(B)(II.A) (no employment decline) has not been met.
TA-W-58,107; Century Furniture Industries, Case Goods Division,
Hickory, NC.
The workers firm does not produce an article as required for
certification under Section 222 of the Trade Act of 1974.
TA-W-58,066; Agere Systems, Inc., Allentown, PA.
TA-W-58,117; George Weston Bakeries, Accounts Payable Department, Bay
Shore, NY.
TA-W-58,270; UTI Integrated Logistics, d/b/a Standard Corp.,
Greenville, SC.
TA-W-58,272; Sun Shade Holding, El Cerrito, CA.
The investigation revealed that criteria (a)(2)(A)(I.C.) (Increased
imports and (a)(2)(B) (II.C) (has shifted production to a foreign
country) have not been met.
None
The investigation revealed that criteria (2) has not been met. The
workers firm (or subdivision) is not a supplier or downstream producer
to trade-affected companies.
TA-W-58,071; EEEA, Inc., Mauldin, SC.
Affirmative Determinations for Worker Adjustment Assistance
The following certifications have been issued; the date following
the company name and location of each determination references the
impact date for all workers of such determination.
The following certifications have been issued. The requirements of
(a)(2)(A) (increased imports) of Section 222 have been met.
TA-W-58,034; Highland Mills, Inc., Charlotte, NC: September 26, 2004.
TA-W-58,051; Miker Companies, Cheektowaga, NY: September 22, 2004.
TA-W-58,056; Neilsen Manufacturing, Inc., Salem, OR: September 30,
2004.
TA-W-58,076; T P Corporation, Duryea, PA: October 5, 2004.
TA-W-58,142; Vishay Roederstein Electronics, Inc., Statesville, NC:
October 13, 2004.
TA-W-58,162; Style Setter Fashions, Inc., Philadelphia, PA: June 7,
2005.
The following certifications have been issued. The requirements of
(a)(2)(B) (shift in production) of Section 222 have been met.
TA-W-58,020; Southwest Corset Corporation, Trading as Southwest Cupid,
Access Employer, Blackwell, OK: September 1, 2004.
TA-W-58,075; Paxar Americas, Inc., Paxar Corporation, Sayre, PA:
October 4, 2004.
TA-W-58,153; Druck, Inc., a/k/a GE Sensing, Adecco, Viking Accountemps,
New Fairfield, CT: October 17, 2004.
TA-W-58,157; High Cotton Enterprises, Inc., Seaming Department, Fort
Payne, AL: October 7, 2004.
The following certification has been issued. The requirement of
supplier to a trade certified firm has been met.
TA-W-58,260; Gemtron Corp., Manpower, Holland, MI: November 2, 2004.
The following certification has been issued. The requirement of
downstream producer to a trade certified firm has been met.
None
Negative Determinations for Alternative Trade Adjustment Assistance
In order for the Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance to issue a
certification of eligibility to apply for
[[Page 72654]]
Alternative Trade Adjustment Assistance (ATAA) for older workers, the
group eligibility requirements of Section 246(a)(3)(A)(ii) of the Trade
Act must be met.
In the following cases, it has been determined that the
requirements of Section 246(a)(3)(ii) have not been met for the reasons
specified.
The Department has determined that criterion (2) of Section 246 has
not been met. Workers at the firm possess skills that are easily
transferable.
TA-W-58,075; Paxar Americas, Inc., Paxar Corporation, Sayre, PA.
The Department has determined that criterion (1) of Section 246 has
not been met. Workers at the firm are 50 years of age or older.
None
Since the workers are denied eligibility to apply for TAA, the
workers cannot be certified eligible for ATAA.
TA-W-58,107; Century Furniture Industries, Case Goods Division,
Hickory, NC.
TA-W-58,140; Samuel Son and Company, Detroit, MI.
TA-W-58,031; ComTal Machine and Engineering, White Bear Township, MN.
TA-W-58,047; Plasti-Coil, Inc., Lake Geneva, WI.
TA-W-58,061; Atfab Company, Painesville, OH.
TA-W-58,066; Agere Systems, Inc., Allentown, PA.
TA-W-58,117; George Weston Bakeries, Accounts Payable Department, Bay
Shore, NY.
TA-W-58,270; UTI Integrated Logistics, d/b/a Standard Corp.,
Greenville, SC.
TA-W-58,272; Sun Shade Holding, El Cerrito, CA.
TA-W-58,071; EEEA, Inc., Mauldin, SC.
The Department as determined that criterion (3) of Section 246 has
not been met. Competition conditions within the workers' industry are
not adverse.
None
Affirmative Determinations for Alternative Trade Ajdustment Assistance
In order for the Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance to issued
a certification of eligibility to apply for Alternative Trade
Adjustment Assistance (ATAA) for older workers, the group eligibility
requirements of Section 246(a)(3)(A)(ii) of the Trade Act must be met.
The following certifications have been issued; the date following
the company name and location of each determination references the
impact date for all workers of such determinations.
In the following cases, it has been determined that the
requirements of Section 246(a)(3)(ii) have been met.
I. Whether a significant number of workers in the workers' firm are
50 years of age or older.
II. Whether the workers in the workers' firm possess skills that
are not easily transferable.
III. The competitive conditions within the workers' industry (i.e.,
conditions within the industry are adverse).
TA-W-58,142; Vishay Roederstein Electronics, Inc., Statesville, NC:
October 13, 2004.
TA-W-58,051; Miker Companies, Cheektowaga, NY: September 22, 2004.
TA-W-58,056; Neilsen Manufacturing, Inc., Salem, OR: September 30,
2004.
TA-W-58,076; T P Corporation, Duryea, PA: October 5, 2004.
TA-W-58,162; Style Setter Fashions, Inc., Philadelphia, PA: June 7,
2005.
TA-W-58,153; Druck, Inc., a/k/a GE Sensing, Adecco, Viking Accountemps,
New Fairfield, CT: October 17, 2004.
TA-W-58,157; High Cotton Enterprises, Inc., Seaming Department, Fort
Payne, AL: October 7, 2004.
TA-W-58,260; Gemtron Corp., Manpower, Holland, MI: November 2, 2004.
I hereby certify that the aforementioned determinations were issued
during the month of November 2005. Copies of these determinations are
available for inspection in Room C-5311, U.S. Department of Labor, 200
Constitution Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20210 during normal business
hours or will be mailed to persons who write to the above address.
Dated: November 28, 2005.
Erica R. Cantor,
Director, Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance.
[FR Doc. E5-6874 Filed 12-5-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510-30-P
