AEW Real Estate Income Fund, et al.; Notice of Application, 71867-71873 [05-23492]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 229 / Wednesday, November 30, 2005 / Notices
collection of information to the Office of
Management and Budget for review and
approval.
Summary of Proposal(s):
(1) Collection title: Request to NonRailroad Employer for Information
About Annuitant’s Work and Earnings.
(2) Form(s) submitted: RL–231–F.
(3) OMB Number: 3220–0107.
(4) Expiration date of current OMB
clearance: 02/28/2006.
(5) Type of request: Extension of a
currently approved collection.
(6) Respondents: Business or other
for-profit.
(7) Estimated annual number of
respondents: 300.
(8) Total annual responses: 300.
(9) Total annual reporting hours: 150.
(10) Collection description: Under the
Railroad Retirement Act (RRA), benefits
are not payable if an annuitant works for
an employer covered under the RRA or
last non-railroad employer. The
collection obtains information regarding
an annuitant’s work and earnings from
a non-railroad employer. The
information will be used for
determining whether benefits should be
withheld.
Additional Information or Comments:
Copies of the forms and supporting
documents can be obtained from
Charles Mierzwa, the agency clearance
officer (312–751–3363) or
Charles.Mierzwa@rrb.gov.
Comments regarding the information
collection should be addressed to
Ronald J. Hodapp, Railroad Retirement
Board, 844 North Rush Street, Chicago,
Illinois 60611–2092 or
Ronald.Hodapp@rrb.gov and to the
OMB Desk Officer for the RRB, at the
Office of Management and Budget,
Room 10230, New Executive Office
Building, Washington, DC 20503.
Charles Mierzwa,
Clearance Officer.
[FR Doc. 05–23475 Filed 11–29–05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7905–01–P
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
COMMISSION
[Investment Company Act Release No.
27166; 812–12909]
AEW Real Estate Income Fund, et al.;
Notice of Application
Date: November 23, 2005.
Securities and Exchange
Commission (‘‘SEC’’ or ‘‘Commission’’).
ACTION: Notice of application for an
order under section 12(d)(1)(J) of the
Investment Company Act of 1940 (the
‘‘Act’’) for an exemption from section
AGENCY:
VerDate Aug<31>2005
19:12 Nov 29, 2005
Jkt 208001
12(d)(1) of the Act, under sections 6(c)
and 17(b) of the Act for an exemption
from section 17(a) of the Act, under
section 6(c) of the Act for an exemption
from sections 18(f) and 21(b) of the Act,
and under section 17(d) of the Act and
Rule 17d–1 under the Act to permit
certain joint arrangements.
Summary of Application: Applicants
request an order that would permit
certain registered management
investment companies to invest cash
balances in affiliated money market
funds and to participate in a joint
lending and borrowing facility.
Applicants: AEW Real Estate Income
Fund, IXIS Advisor Funds Trust I
(formerly CDC Nvest Funds Trust I),
IXIS Advisor Funds Trust II (formerly
CDC Nvest Funds Trust II), IXIS Advisor
Funds Trust III (formerly CDC Nvest
Funds Trust III), IXIS Advisor Funds
Trusts IV (formerly CDC Nvest
Companies Trust I), IXIS Advisor Cash
Management Trust (formerly CDC Nvest
Cash Management Trust), Harris
Associates Investment Trust, Loomis
Sayles Funds I (formerly Loomis Sayles
Investment Trust), Loomis Sayles Funds
II (formerly Loomis Sayles Funds),
Delafield Fund, Inc., Institutional Daily
Income Fund, Cortland Trust, Inc., and
Short Term Income Fund, Inc. (each, a
‘‘Trust,’’ and each Trust on behalf of
itself and its existing series, an ‘‘Existing
Fund’’); AEW Management and
Advisers, L.P., IXIS Asset Management
Advisors, L.P. (formerly CDC IXIS Asset
Management Advisers, L.P.), Harris
Associates L.P., Loomis, Sayles &
Company, L.P., and Reich & Tang Asset
Management, LLC (each, an ‘‘Applicant
Adviser’’).
Filing Dates: The application was
filed on December 12, 2002, and
amended on November 2, 2005.
Hearing or Notification of Hearing: An
order granting the application will be
issued unless the Commission orders a
hearing. Interested persons may request
a hearing by writing to the
Commission’s Secretary and serving
Applicants with a copy of the request,
personally or by mail. Hearing requests
should be received by the Commission
by 5:30 p.m. on December 20, 2005 and
should be accompanied by proof of
service on the Applicants in the form of
an affidavit or, for lawyers, a certificate
of service. Hearing requests should state
the nature of the writer’s interest, the
reason for the request, and the issues
contested. Persons who wish to be
notified of a hearing may request
notification by writing to the
Commission’s Secretary.
ADDRESSES: Secretary, SEC, 100 F Street,
NE., Washington, DC 20549–9303;
PO 00000
Frm 00068
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
71867
Applicants, c/o Coleen Downs Dinneen,
Esq., IXIS Asset Advisors, L.P., 399
Boylston Street, Boston, MA 02116.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Deepak T. Pai, Senior Counsel, at (202)
551–6876, or Stacy L. Fuller, Branch
Chief, at (202) 551–6821 (Division of
Investment Management, Office of
Investment Company Regulation).
The
following is a summary of the
Application. The complete application
may be obtained for a fee at the SEC’s
Public Reference Branch, 100 F Street,
NE., Washington, DC 20549–0102 at
telephone (202) 551–5850.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Applicants’ Representations
1. Each of the Existing Funds is a
management investment company
registered under the Act, and is
organized as a Massachusetts business
trust or a Maryland corporation. All but
one of the Existing Funds are open-end
investment companies (‘‘open-end
Funds’’); the AEW Real Estate Income
Fund is a closed-end investment
company (‘‘closed-end Fund’’). Certain
of the open-end Funds are money
market funds subject to the
requirements of Rule 2a–7 under the Act
(each, a ‘‘Central Fund’’). Any Funds
that are not Central Funds are referred
to herein as ‘‘Participating Funds.’’
2. Applicants request that any relief
granted pursuant to the Application also
apply to any future series of the Trusts
and to any other existing or future
registered management investment
companies, or series thereof, for which
an Applicant Adviser, or a company
controlling, controlled by, or under
common control with an Applicant
Adviser (together with the Applicant
Advisers, the ‘‘Advisers’’), acts as
investment adviser or sub-adviser
(‘‘Future Funds’’ and together with the
Existing Funds, the ‘‘Funds’’).1 Each
Applicant Adviser is registered as an
investment adviser under the
Investment Advisers Act of 1940, and is
an investment adviser to one or more of
the Existing Funds. Each Applicant
Adviser is an indirect wholly-owned
subsidiary of IXIS Asset Management
North America, L.P. Each Adviser, as
the primary investment adviser or as
subadviser to a Participating Fund is,
and will be, responsible for the
investment of Cash Balances, as defined
below.
1 All existing Funds that presently intend to rely
on the order are named as Applicants. Any existing
or future Fund that subsequently relies on the order
will comply with the terms and conditions in the
Application.
E:\FR\FM\30NON1.SGM
30NON1
71868
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 229 / Wednesday, November 30, 2005 / Notices
A. Investment of Cash Balances in the
Central Funds
1. Each Participating Fund has, or
may be expected to have, cash reserves
that have not been invested in portfolio
securities (‘‘Uninvested Cash’’) held by
its custodian. Uninvested Cash may
result from a wide variety of sources,
including dividends or interest received
on portfolio securities, unsettled
securities transactions, strategic
reserves, matured investments,
liquidations of investment securities,
and new investor monies. In addition,
certain of the Participating Funds also
may participate in a securities lending
program (‘‘Securities Lending Program’’)
under which the Participating Funds
lend their securities to registered brokerdealers or other institutional investors.
These loans are continuously secured by
collateral equal at all times to at least
the market value of the securities
loaned. Collateral for these loans may
include cash (‘‘Cash Collateral,’’ and
together with Uninvested Cash, ‘‘Cash
Balances’’). Any Securities Lending
Program, including any investment of
Cash Collateral will comply with all
present and future Commission and staff
positions regarding securities lending
arrangements.
2. Applicants request an order to
permit each Participating Fund to use
its Cash Balances to purchase shares of
one or more of the Central Funds that
are in the same group of investment
companies (as defined in section
12(d)(1)(G) of the Act) as the
Participating Fund, and each Central
Fund to sell its shares to, and redeem its
shares from, Participating Funds that are
in the same group of investment
companies as the Central Fund (‘‘Cash
Sweep’’). Investment by a Participating
Fund of Cash Balances in shares of the
Central Funds will be in accordance
with each Participating Fund’s
investment restrictions and will be
consistent with each Participating
Fund’s policies as set forth in its
prospectus or statement of additional
information (‘‘SAI’’). Applicants believe
that by investing Cash Balances in the
Central Funds, Participating Funds may
reduce their transaction costs, create
more liquidity, increase returns, and
diversify holdings.
3. In connection with the proposed
Cash Sweep transactions, applicants
request an order under (i) section
12(d)(1)(J) of the Act granting relief from
sections 12(d)(1)(A) and (B) of the Act;
(ii) sections 6(c) and 17(b) of the Act
granting relief from section 17(a) of the
Act; (iii) section 17(d) of the Act and
Rule 17d–1 under the Act to permit
certain joint arrangements.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
19:12 Nov 29, 2005
Jkt 208001
B. Interfund Lending Program
1. Under current arrangements, the
Funds may lend money to banks,
brokers or other entities by entering into
repurchase agreements or purchasing
other short-term instruments. In
addition, the open-end Funds may
borrow money from the same or other
banks for temporary or emergency
purposes to satisfy redemption requests
or to cover unanticipated cash
shortfalls, such as trade ‘‘fails’’ in which
cash payments for a portfolio security
sold by a Fund have been delayed. The
open-end Funds may have credit
arrangements with their custodians
under which a custodian may, but is not
obligated to, lend money to the Funds
to meet their temporary or emergency
cash needs. The open-end Funds may
also borrow money from banks, brokers
and other entities by entering into
reverse repurchase agreements and
economically similar transactions.
2. If an open-end Fund borrows
money from any bank under its current
arrangements or under other
arrangements, the Fund will pay interest
on the borrowed cash at a significantly
higher rate than the rate that would be
earned by other (non-borrowing) Funds
on repurchase agreements and other
short-term instruments of the same
maturity as the bank loan. Applicants
believe this differential represents the
bank’s profit for serving as a middleman
between a borrower and lender. Other
bank loan arrangements, such as
committed lines of credit, may require
a borrowing Fund to pay substantial
commitment fees in addition to the
interest rate to be paid by the Fund on
outstanding loans.
3. Applicants request an order that
would permit Funds that are in the
same group of investment companies to
enter into lending agreements
(‘‘Interfund Lending Agreements’’) to
lend and borrow money for temporary
purposes directly to and from each other
through a credit facility (‘‘Interfund
Loans’’).2 Applicants believe that the
proposed credit facility (‘‘Credit
Facility’’) would both substantially
reduce the borrowing costs of an openend Fund that sought to borrow money
for temporary or emergency purposes
and enhance the ability of a lending
Fund to earn higher rates of interest on
its short-term loans than it might
otherwise earn on high quality, shortterm, interest-bearing investments.
Although the Credit Facility would
substantially reduce an open-end
Fund’s reliance on bank credit
2 The Central Funds and closed-end Funds will
participate in the Credit Facility only as lenders.
PO 00000
Frm 00069
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
arrangements, the Funds may continue
to maintain bank loan facilities.
4. Applicants state that the Credit
Facility would likely provide a
borrowing Fund with significant savings
when its cash position is insufficient to
meet temporary cash requirements. This
situation could arise when redemptions
exceed anticipated volumes and the
borrowing Fund has insufficient cash on
hand to satisfy such redemptions. When
the Funds liquidate portfolio securities
to meet redemption requests, which
normally are effected immediately, they
often do not receive payment in
settlement for up to three days (or
longer for certain foreign transactions).
The Credit Facility would provide a
source of immediate, short-term
liquidity pending settlement of the sale
of portfolio securities.
5. Applicants also propose using the
Credit Facility when a sale of securities
fails due to circumstances beyond a
Fund’s control, such as delay in the
delivery of cash to the Fund’s custodian
or improper delivery instructions by the
broker effecting the transaction (‘‘sales
fails’’). Sales fails may present a cash
shortfall if the Fund has undertaken to
purchase a security with the proceeds
from securities sold. Under such
circumstances, the Fund could fail on
its intended purchase due to lack of
funds from the previous sale, resulting
in additional costs to the Fund, or sell
a security on a same day settlement
basis, earning a lower return on the
investment. Use of the Credit Facility
would enable the Funds to have access
to immediate short-term liquidity
without incurring overdraft or other
charges.
6. While bank borrowings generally
could supply needed cash to cover
unanticipated redemptions and sales
fails, under the Credit Facility a
borrowing Fund would pay lower
interest rates than those that would be
payable under short-term loans offered
by banks. In addition, Funds making
short-term cash loans directly to other
Funds would earn interest at a rate
higher than they otherwise could obtain
from investing their cash in repurchase
agreements or purchasing shares of
Central Funds. Thus, Applicants assert
that the Credit Facility would benefit
both borrowing and lending Funds.
7. The interest rate to be charged on
Interfund Loans (the ‘‘Interfund Rate’’)
would be determined daily and would
be the average of (i) the higher of (x) the
‘‘OTD Rate,’’ as defined below, and (y)
the ‘‘Repo Rate,’’ as defined below, and
(ii) the ‘‘Bank Loan Rate,’’ as defined
below. The OTD Rate on any day would
be the highest rate available to the
lending Funds from investments in
E:\FR\FM\30NON1.SGM
30NON1
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 229 / Wednesday, November 30, 2005 / Notices
overnight time deposits. The Repo Rate
on any day would be the highest interest
rate available to the lending Funds from
investments in overnight repurchase
agreements. The Bank Loan Rate for any
day would be calculated by the
Interfund Lending Team, as defined
below, according to a formula
established by the board of trustees of
each Fund (‘‘Board’’), intended to
approximate the lowest interest rate at
which short-term bank loans are
available to the Funds. The formula
would be based upon a publicly
available rate (e.g., Federal funds rate
plus 25 basis points) and would vary
with that rate to reflect changing bank
loan rates. The initial formula and any
subsequent modification thereto would
be subject to the approval of the Board
of each Fund. In addition, each Fund’s
Board periodically would review the
continuing appropriateness of reliance
on the publicly available rate used to
determine the Bank Loan Rate, as well
as the relationship between the Bank
Loan Rate and current bank loan rates
available to the Funds.
8. The Credit Facility would be
administered by personnel at Reich &
Tang Asset Management, LLC (‘‘Reich &
Tang’’) who have accounting
experience, are members of its mutual
fund administration group or the
financial analysis department, and who
are not portfolio managers of a Fund
(‘‘Interfund Lending Team’’). No
portfolio manager from any Fund would
participate in the administration of the
Credit Facility. Under the Credit
Facility, the portfolio managers for each
Fund could provide standing
instructions to participate daily as a
borrower or lender. On each business
day the Interfund Lending Team would
collect data on the uninvested cash and
borrowing requirements of the Funds
from each Fund’s custodian, portfolio
managers and/or administrators. Once it
had determined the aggregate amount of
cash available for loans and borrowing
demand, the Interfund Lending Team
would allocate loans among borrowing
Funds without any further
communication from portfolio
managers. Applicants expect there to be
far more available cash each day than
borrowing demand. After allocating
cash for Interfund Loans, the Interfund
Lending Team would invest any
remaining cash in accordance with the
standing instructions of the relevant
Fund’s portfolio managers or return
remaining amounts for investment
directly by the portfolio manager of the
Fund.
9. The Interfund Lending Team would
allocate borrowing demand and cash
available for lending among the Funds
VerDate Aug<31>2005
19:12 Nov 29, 2005
Jkt 208001
on what the Interfund Lending Team
believed to be an equitable basis, subject
to certain administrative requirements
applicable to all Funds, such as the time
of filing requests to participate,
minimum loan sizes, and the need to
minimize the number of transactions
and associated administrative costs. To
reduce transaction costs, each Interfund
Loan may be allocated to minimize the
number of participants necessary to
complete that Interfund Loan
transaction. The Interfund Lending
Team would not solicit cash for loans
from any Funds or publish or
disseminate the amount of current
borrowing demand to portfolio
managers.
10. The Interfund Lending Team
would (i) monitor the interest rates
charged and the other terms and
conditions of the Interfund Loans, (ii)
limit the borrowings and loans entered
into by each Fund to ensure that they
comply with the Fund’s investment
policies and limitations, (iii) ensure
equitable treatment of each Fund under
the Credit Facility, and (iv) make
quarterly reports to the Funds’ Boards
concerning any transactions by the
Funds under the Credit Facility and the
Interfund Rates. The method of
allocation and related administrative
procedures would be approved by each
Fund’s Board, including a majority of
trustees who are not interested persons
of the Fund, as defined in section
2(a)(19) of the Act (‘‘Independent
Trustees’’), to ensure that both
borrowing Funds and lending Funds
participate in the Credit Facility on an
equitable basis.
11. Reich & Tang would administer
the Credit Facility pursuant to a form of
Interfund Lending Agreement (to which
Reich & Tang and each Fund
participating in the Credit Facility
would be a party). Reich & Tang would
not receive any fees in connection with
its administration of the Credit Facility.
12. No Fund would participate in the
Credit Facility unless (i) it had fully
disclosed all material information
concerning the Credit Facility in its
prospectus or SAI, or, in the case of a
closed-end Fund, in its registration
statement or shareholder reports, (ii) it
had obtained shareholder approval to
participate in the Credit Facility, if
shareholder approval were required by
the Fund’s fundamental investment
policies, and (iii) the Fund’s
participation in the Credit Facility was
consistent with its investment policies
and restrictions and its organizational
documents.
13. In connection with the Credit
Facility, Applicants request an order
under (i) section 6(c) granting relief
PO 00000
Frm 00070
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
71869
from sections 18(f) and 21(b) of the Act;
(ii) section 12(d)(1)(J) granting relief
from sections 12(d)(1)(A) and (B) of the
Act; (iii) sections 6(c) and 17(b) granting
relief from sections 17(a) and (iv)
section 17(d) and Rule 17d–1 to permit
certain joint arrangements.
Applicants’ Legal Analysis
A. Investment of Cash Balances in the
Central Funds
1. Section 12(d)(1)(A) provides that no
registered investment company may
acquire securities of another investment
company representing more than 3% of
the acquired company’s outstanding
voting stock, more than 5% of the
acquiring company’s total assets, or,
together with the securities of other
investment companies, more than 10%
of the acquiring company’s total assets.
Section 12(d)(1)(B) provides that no
registered open-end investment
company, its principal underwriter or
any broker or dealer, may sell the
company’s securities to another
investment company if the sale will
cause the acquiring company to own
more than 3% of the acquired
company’s voting stock, or if the sale
will cause more than 10% of the
acquired company’s voting stock to be
owned by investment companies.
2. Section 12(d)(1)(J) provides that the
Commission may exempt any person,
security, or transaction, or classes of
persons, securities or transactions, from
any provision of section 12(d)(1) if and
to the extent that the exemption is
consistent with the public interest and
the protection of investors. Applicants
request relief under section 12(d)(1)(J)
from the limitations of sections
12(d)(1)(A) and (B) to permit each
Participating Fund to invest its Cash
Balances in the Central Funds that are
in the same group of investment
companies as the Participating Fund;
under the requested order, the
Participating Fund’s aggregate
investment of Uninvested Cash in the
Central Funds would not exceed the
greater of 25% of such Participating
Fund’s total assets or $10 million.
3. Applicants state that the proposed
investment of Cash Balances in the
Central Funds will not result in the
abuses meant to be addressed by section
12(d)(1), including undue influence,
layering of fees and complexity.
Applicants state that because each
Central Fund will maintain a highly
liquid portfolio and both the
Participating Fund and the Central Fund
are in the same group of investment
companies, there should not be a
concern about undue influence by a
Participating Fund over a Central Fund.
E:\FR\FM\30NON1.SGM
30NON1
71870
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 229 / Wednesday, November 30, 2005 / Notices
With respect to layering of fees,
Applicants note that shares of the
Central Funds sold to the Participating
Funds will not be subject to a sales load,
redemption fee, distribution fee under a
plan adopted in accordance with Rule
12b–1 under the Act, or service fee (as
defined in Rule 2830(b)(9) of the
National Association of Securities
Dealers, Inc. Conduct Rules (‘‘NASD
Conduct Rules’’)). Applicants state that
if a Central Fund offers more than one
class of shares, a Participating Fund will
invest its Cash Balances only in the
class with the lowest expense ratio at
the time of the investment. In addition,
before the next meeting of the Board of
a Participating Fund is held for the
purpose of voting on any investment
advisory contract, the investment
adviser will provide the Board with
information on the approximate cost to
the adviser of, or portion of the advisory
fee under the existing contract
attributable to, managing the
Participating Fund’s Uninvested Cash
that may be invested in the Central
Funds. Further, before approving any
investment advisory contract for a
Participating Fund, the Board of the
Participating Fund, including a majority
of the Independent Trustees, will
consider to what extent, if any, the
investment advisory fees charged to the
Participating Fund should be reduced to
account for the reduced services
provided to the Participating Fund as a
result of Uninvested Cash being
invested in the Central Funds. With
regard to complexity, Applicants
include a condition that the Central
Funds will not acquire shares of any
other investment company or company
relying on sections 3(c)(1) or 3(c)(7) of
the Act in excess of the limits contained
in section 12(d)(1)(A), except as
permitted by a Commission order
governing interfund loans.
4. Section 17(a) makes it unlawful for
any affiliated person of a registered
investment company, or any affiliated
person of the affiliated person (‘‘Second
Tier Affiliate’’), acting as principal,
knowingly to sell any security to or
purchase any security from the
investment company. Section 2(a)(3) of
the Act defines an ‘‘affiliated person’’ to
include any person directly or indirectly
owning, controlling, or holding with
power to vote 5% or more of the
outstanding voting securities of the
other person; any person directly or
indirectly controlling, controlled by, or
under common control with the other
person; and, in the case of an
investment company, its investment
adviser. Applicants state that because
the Funds share a common Adviser or
VerDate Aug<31>2005
19:12 Nov 29, 2005
Jkt 208001
have Advisers that are under common
control, the Funds may be deemed to be
under common control and, thus,
affiliated persons of each other. In
addition, applicants state that a
Participating Fund may acquire more
than 5% of a Central Fund’s outstanding
voting securities and, as a result, the
Participating Fund and the Central Fund
may be deemed to be affiliated persons
of each other. The sale of shares by the
Central Funds to the Participating
Funds and the redemption of such
shares would thus be prohibited under
section 17(a).
5. Section 17(b) authorizes the
Commission to exempt a transaction
from section 17(a) if the terms of the
proposed transaction, including the
consideration to be paid or received, are
reasonable and fair and do not involve
overreaching on the part of any person
concerned, and the proposed
transaction is consistent with the policy
of each registered investment company
concerned and with the general
purposes of the Act. Section 6(c)
authorizes the Commission to exempt
any person or transaction from any
provision of the Act if the exemption is
necessary or appropriate in the public
interest and consistent with the
protection of investors and the purposes
fairly intended by the policy and
provisions of the Act.
6. Applicants submit that the request
for relief to permit the purchase and
redemption of shares of the Central
Funds by the Participating Funds
satisfies the standards in sections 6(c)
and 17(b). Applicants note that shares of
the Central Funds will be purchased
and redeemed at their net asset value,
the same consideration paid and
received for these shares by any other
shareholder. In addition, Applicants
state that the Participating Funds will
retain their ability to invest Cash
Balances directly in money market or
other instruments as authorized by their
respective investment objectives and
policies if they believe they can obtain
a higher rate of return or for any other
reason. Each Central Fund reserves the
right to discontinue selling shares to any
of the Participating Funds if its Board
determines that the sale will adversely
affect its portfolio management and
operations.
7. Section 17(d) and Rule 17d–1
prohibit any affiliated person of a
registered investment company, acting
as principal, from participating in or
effecting any transaction in connection
with any joint enterprise or joint
arrangement in which the investment
company participates. Applicants state
that each Participating Fund (by
purchasing shares of the Central Funds),
PO 00000
Frm 00071
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
the Advisers (by managing the assets of
the Participating Funds and the Central
Funds, including the Participating
Funds’ investments in the Central
Funds), and each Central Fund (by
selling shares to the Participating
Funds) could be deemed to be
participants in a ‘‘joint enterprise or
other joint arrangement’’ within the
meaning of section 17(d) and Rule 17d–
1.
8. Rule 17d–1 permits the
Commission to approve a joint
arrangement covered by the terms of
section 17(d). In determining whether to
approve a transaction, the Commission
considers whether the investment
company’s participation in the joint
enterprise is consistent with the
provisions, policies, and purposes of the
Act, and the extent to which the
participation is on a basis different from
or less advantageous than that of other
participants. Applicants submit that
investments by the Participating Funds
will be at net asset value and will be
indistinguishable from any other
shareholder account maintained by the
Central Funds, and that the transactions
will be consistent with the Act.
Applicants further submit that the
arrangement is not intended to increase
the fees earned by the Advisers. Thus,
applicants contend that the proposed
transactions meet the standards for
relief under Rule 17d–1.
B. Interfund Lending Program
1. Section 17(a)(3) of the Act generally
prohibits any affiliated person or
Second-Tier Affiliate from borrowing
money or other property from a
registered investment company. Section
21(b) generally prohibits any registered
management company from lending
money or other property to any person
if that person controls or is under
common control with the company. As
discussed above, Applicants believe that
the Funds may be deemed to be under
common control and, as a result,
prohibited from participating in the
Credit Facility because of sections
17(a)(3) and 21(b).
2. Applicants submit that sections
17(a)(3) and 21(b) were intended to
prevent a party with potential adverse
interests to, and some influence over the
investment decisions of, a registered
investment company from causing or
inducing the investment company to
engage in lending transactions that
unfairly benefit that party and that are
detrimental to the best interests of the
investment company and its
shareholders. Applicants assert that the
proposed transactions do not raise such
concerns for the following reasons: (i)
Reich & Tang would receive no
E:\FR\FM\30NON1.SGM
30NON1
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 229 / Wednesday, November 30, 2005 / Notices
compensation for administering the
Credit Facility; (ii) all Interfund Loans
would consist only of uninvested cash
reserves that the Fund otherwise would
invest in short-term repurchase
agreements or other short-term
investments; (iii) the Interfund Loans
would not involve a greater risk than
such other investments; (iv) the lending
Fund would earn interest on Interfund
Loans at a rate higher than it could
obtain through such other investments;
and (v) the borrowing Fund would pay
interest at a rate lower than otherwise
available to it under bank loan
agreements and avoid commitment fees
associated with committed lines of
credit. Moreover, Applicants believe
that the other conditions proposed
would effectively preclude the
possibility of any Fund obtaining undue
advantage over any other Fund.
3. Applicants also seek exemptions
from section 17(a)(1) under sections 6(c)
and 17(b) and from section 12(d)(1)
under section 12(d)(1)(J) with respect to
the Credit Facility. Applicants state that
the obligation of a borrowing Fund to
repay an Interfund Loan may constitute
a security under sections 17(a)(1) and
12(d)(1). Applicants contend that the
standards under sections 6(c), 17(b), and
12(d)(1)(J), as stated above, are satisfied
for all the reasons set forth in the two
preceding paragraphs in support of their
request for relief from sections 17(a)(3)
and 21(b) and for the reasons set forth
below.
4. As discussed above, Applicants
state that section 12(d)(1) was intended
to prevent the pyramiding of investment
companies in order to avoid, among
other things, duplicative costs and fees
that are generated by multiple layers of
investment companies. Applicants
submit that the Credit Facility does not
involve these types of abuses. Regarding
duplicative costs, Applicants state that
Reich & Tang would administer the
Credit Facility pursuant to an Interfund
Lending Agreement between it and the
relevant Fund and would not receive
any compensation for its services.
Applicants further state that the purpose
of the Credit Facility is to provide
economic benefits for all participating
Funds.
5. Section 18(f)(1) prohibits open-end
investment companies from issuing any
senior security, except that a company
may borrow from any bank so long as
immediately after the borrowing there is
asset coverage of at least 300% for all
borrowings of the company. Under
section 18(g) of the Act, the term ‘‘senior
security’’ includes any bond, debenture,
note, or similar obligation or instrument
constituting a security and evidencing
indebtedness. Applicants request
VerDate Aug<31>2005
19:12 Nov 29, 2005
Jkt 208001
exemptive relief from section 18(f)(1) to
the limited extent necessary to
implement the Credit Facility (because
the lending Funds are not banks).
6. Applicants believe that granting
relief under section 6(c) is appropriate.
Based on the conditions and safeguards
described in the Application,
Applicants also submit that to allow the
Funds to borrow from other Funds
under the Credit Facility is consistent
with the purposes and policies of
section 18(f)(1).
7. Applicants also request an order
under Rule 17d–1 with respect to the
Credit Facility. Applicants state that the
Credit Facility could be deemed to be a
‘‘joint enterprise or other joint
arrangement’’ within the meaning of
section 17(d) and Rule 17d–1.
Applicants submit that the proposed
transactions meet the standards of Rule
17d–1 because the Credit Facility offers
both reduced borrowing costs to
borrowing Funds and enhanced returns
on loaned funds to lending Funds.
Applicants note that each Fund would
have an equal opportunity to borrow
and lend on equal terms consistent with
its investments policies and
fundamental investment limitations and
that Reich & Tang would not receive any
compensation for administering the
Credit Facility. Applicants therefore
believe that each Fund’s participation in
the Credit Facility would be on terms
that are no different from or less
advantageous than those of other
participants.
Applicants’ Conditions
Applicants agree that any order of the
Commission granting the requested
relief will be subject to the following
conditions:
A. Investment of Cash Balances in the
Central Funds
1. The shares of the Central Funds
sold to and redeemed by the
Participating Funds will not be subject
to a sales load, redemption fee,
distribution fee under a plan adopted in
accordance with Rule 12b–1 under the
Act, or service fee (as defined in NASD
Conduct Rule 2830(b)(9)).
2. No Central Fund will acquire
securities of any other investment
company or company relying on section
3(c)(1) or 3(c)(7) of the Act in excess of
the limits contained in section
12(d)(1)(A) of the Act, except as
permitted by an SEC order governing
interfund loans.
3. Before the next meeting of the
Board of a Participating Fund is held for
the purpose of voting on an investment
advisory contract of the Participating
Fund under section 15 of the Act, the
PO 00000
Frm 00072
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
71871
investment adviser to the Participating
Fund will provide the Board with
specific information regarding the
approximate cost to the investment
adviser of, or the portion of the
investment advisory fee under the
existing investment advisory agreement
attributable to, managing the
Uninvested Cash of the Participating
Fund that may be invested in the
Central Funds. Before approving any
investment advisory contract for a
Participating Fund, the Board of the
Participating Fund, including a majority
of the Independent Trustees, shall
consider to what extent, if any, the
investment advisory fees charged to the
Participating Fund should be reduced to
account for reduced services provided
to the Participating Fund as a result of
Uninvested Cash being invested in the
Central Funds. The minute books of the
Participating Fund will record fully the
Board’s consideration in approving the
investment advisory contract, including
the considerations relating to the fees
referred to above.
4. A Participating Fund may invest
Uninvested Cash in, and hold shares of,
the Central Funds only to the extent that
such Participating Fund’s aggregate
investment of Uninvested Cash in the
Central Funds does not exceed the
greater of 25% of the Participating
Fund’s total assets or $10 million.
5. Each Participating Fund and
Central Fund shall be advised by an
Adviser. Each Participating Fund may
only invest in Central Funds that are in
the same group of investment
companies, as defined in section
12(d)(1)(G) of the Act, as the
Participating Fund. A Participating
Fund that is subadvised by an Adviser
may rely on the order provided that the
Adviser manages Cash Balances.
6. Investment of Cash Balances by a
Participating Fund in shares of the
Central Funds will be consistent with
each Participating Fund’s respective
investment restrictions and policies as
set forth in its prospectus and SAI or, in
the case of a closed-end Fund, in its
registration statement or shareholder
reports.
7. Before a Participating Fund may
participate in a Securities Lending
Program, a majority of the Board,
including a majority of the Independent
Trustees, will approve the Participating
Fund’s participation in the Securities
Lending Program. The Board also will
evaluate the Securities Lending Program
and its results no less frequently than
annually and determine that any
investment of Cash Collateral in the
Central Funds is in the best interest of
the shareholders of the Participating
Fund.
E:\FR\FM\30NON1.SGM
30NON1
71872
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 229 / Wednesday, November 30, 2005 / Notices
8. The Board of any Participating
Fund will satisfy the fund governance
standards as defined in rule 0–1(a)(7)
under the Act by the compliance date
for the rule.
B. Interfund Lending Under the Credit
Facility
1. The interest rate to be charge to the
Funds under the Credit Facility will be
the average of (i) the higher of (x) the
OTD Rate and (y) the Repo Rate and (ii)
the Bank Loan Rate.
2. The Interfund Lending Team on
each business day will compare the
Bank Loan Rate with the Repo Rate and
the OTD Rate and will make cash
available for Interfund Loans only if the
Interfund Rate is (i) more favorable to
the lending Fund than both the Repo
Rate and the OTD Rate and (ii) more
favorable to the borrowing Fund than
the Bank Loan Rate.
3. If a Fund has outstanding
borrowings, then any Interfund Loans to
the Fund (i) will be at an interest rate
equal to or lower than any outstanding
bank loan, (ii) will be secured at least on
an equal priority basis with at least an
equivalent percentage of collateral to
loan value as any outstanding bank loan
that requires collateral, (iii) will have a
maturity no longer than any outstanding
bank loan (and in no event more than
seven days) and (iv) will provide that if
an event of default occurs under any
agreement evidencing an outstanding
bank loan to the Fund, that event of
default will automatically (without need
for action or notice by the lending Fund)
constitute an immediate event of default
under the Interfund Lending Agreement.
This event of default will entitle the
lending Fund to call the Interfund Loan
and exercise all rights with respect to
the collateral, if any. Such call will be
made if a lending bank or banks exercise
their rights to call their loan under an
agreement with the borrowing Fund.
4. A Fund may make an unsecured
borrowing through the Credit Facility if
its outstanding borrowings from all
sources immediately after the interfund
borrowing total 10% or less of its total
assets, provided that if the Fund has a
secured loan outstanding from any other
lender, including but not limited to
another Fund, the Fund’s interfund
borrowing will be secured on at least an
equal priority basis with at least an
equivalent percentage of collateral to
loan value as any outstanding loan that
requires collateral. If a Fund’s total
outstanding borrowings immediately
after an interfund borrowing would be
greater than 10% of its total assets, the
Fund may borrow through the Credit
Facility only on a secured basis. A Fund
may not borrow through the Credit
VerDate Aug<31>2005
19:12 Nov 29, 2005
Jkt 208001
Facility or from any other source if its
total outstanding borrowings
immediately after the interfund
borrowing would be more than 331⁄3%
of its total assets.
5. Before any Fund that has
outstanding interfund borrowings may,
through additional borrowings, cause its
outstanding borrowings from all sources
to exceed 10% of its total assets, the
Fund must first secure each outstanding
Interfund Loan by the pledge of
segregated collateral with a market
value at least equal to 102% of the
outstanding principal value of the loan.
If the total outstanding borrowings of a
Fund with outstanding Interfund Loans
exceed 10% of its total assets for any
other reason (such as a decline in net
asset value or shareholder redemptions),
the Fund will within one business day
thereafter (i) repay all of its outstanding
Interfund Loans, (ii) reduce its
outstanding indebtedness to 10% or less
of its total assets or (iii) secure each
outstanding Interfund Loan by a pledge
of segregated collateral with a market
value at least equal to 102% of the
outstanding principal value of the loan
until the Fund’s total outstanding
borrowings cease to exceed 10% of its
total assets, at which time the collateral
called for by this condition (5) will no
longer be required. Until each Interfund
Loan that is outstanding any time that
a Fund’s total outstanding borrowings
exceed 10% is repaid or the Fund’s total
outstanding borrowings cease to exceed
10% of its total assets, the Fund will
mark the value of the collateral to
market each day and will pledge such
additional collateral as is necessary to
maintain the market value of the
collateral that secures each outstanding
Interfund Loan at least equal to 102% of
the outstanding principal value of the
Interfund Loan.
6. No Fund may loan funds through
the Credit Facility if the loan would
cause its aggregate outstanding loans
through the Credit Facility to exceed
15% of its net assets at the time of the
loan.
7. A Fund’s Interfund Loans to any
one Fund shall not exceed 5% of the
lending Fund’s net assets.
8. The duration of Interfund Loans
will be limited to the time required to
receive payment for securities sold, but
in no event more than seven days. Loans
effected within seven days of each other
will be treated as separate loan
transactions for purposes of this
condition (8).
9. Unless the Fund has a policy that
prevents it from borrowing for other
than temporary or emergency purposes,
its borrowing through the Credit
Facility, as measured on the day the
PO 00000
Frm 00073
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
most recent Interfund Loan was made to
it, will not exceed the greater of 125%
of the Fund’s total net cash redemptions
or 102% of sales fails for the preceding
seven calendar days.
10. Each Interfund Loan may be called
on one business day’s notice by the
lending Fund and may be repaid on any
day by the borrowing Fund.
11. A Fund’s participation in the
Credit Facility must be consistent with
its investment policies and limitations
and organizational documents.
12. The Interfund Lending Team will
calculate total Fund borrowing and
lending demand through the Credit
Facility, and allocate Interfund Loans on
an equitable basis among Funds,
without the intervention of any portfolio
manager of any Fund. The Interfund
Lending Team will not solicit cash for
the Credit Facility from any Fund or
prospectively publish or disseminate
loan demand data to portfolio managers.
The Interfund Lending Team will invest
amounts remaining after satisfaction of
borrowing demand in accordance with
standing instructions from portfolio
managers or return remaining amounts
for investment directly by the relevant
Fund’s portfolio managers.
13. The Interfund Lending Team will
monitor the interest rates charged and
the other terms and conditions of the
Interfund Loans and will make a
quarterly report to each Fund’s Board
concerning the participation of the Fund
in the Credit Facility and the terms and
other conditions of any extensions of
credit under the Credit Facility.
14. Each Fund’s Board, including a
majority of the Independent Trustees: (i)
Will review no less frequently than
quarterly the Fund’s participation in the
Credit Facility during the preceding
quarter for compliance with the
conditions of any order permitting such
transactions; (ii) will establish the Bank
Loan Rate formula used to determine
the interest rate on Interfund Loans, and
review no less frequently than annually
the continuing appropriateness of such
Bank Loan Rate formula; and (iii) will
review no less frequently than annually
the continuing appropriateness of the
Fund’s participation in the Credit
Facility.
15. If an Interfund Loan is not paid
according to its terms and such default
is not cured within two business days
from its maturity or from the time the
lending Fund makes a demand for
payment under the provisions of the
Interfund Lending Agreement, the
Interfund Lending Team promptly will
refer such loan for arbitration to an
independent arbitrator who has been
selected by the Board of any Fund
involved in the loan who will serve as
E:\FR\FM\30NON1.SGM
30NON1
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 229 / Wednesday, November 30, 2005 / Notices
arbitrator of disputes concerning
Interfund Loans.3 The arbitrator will
resolve any problem promptly, and the
arbitrator’s decision will be binding on
both Funds. The arbitrator will submit,
at least annually, a written report to the
Board of the Funds involved in any
such dispute setting forth a description
of the nature of any dispute and the
actions taken by the Funds to resolve
the dispute.
16. Each Fund will maintain and
preserve for a period of not less than six
years from the end of the fiscal year in
which any Interfund Loan occurred, the
first two years in an easily accessible
place, a written record of all such
transactions setting forth a description
of the terms of the transaction,
including the amount, the maturity and
the rate of interest on the loan, the OTD
Rate, the rate of interest available at the
time on overnight repurchase
agreements and bank borrowings, and
such other information presented to the
Fund’s Board in connection with the
review required by conditions (13) and
(14).
17. The Interfund Lending Team will
prepare and submit to the Board of each
Fund for review an initial report
describing the operations of the Credit
Facility and the procedures to be
implemented to ensure that all Funds
are treated fairly. After the Credit
Facility commences operations, the
Interfund Lending Team will report to
the Board quarterly on the operations of
the Credit Facility.
In addition, for two years following
the commencement of the Credit
Facility, the independent public
accountant for each Fund shall prepare
an annual report that evaluates the
Interfund Lending Team’s assertion that
it has established procedures reasonably
designed to achieve compliance with
the conditions of the order. The report
shall be prepared in accordance with
the Statements on Standards for
Attestation Engagements No. 10 and it
shall be filed pursuant to Item 77Q3 of
Form N-SAR, as such Statements or
Form may be revised, amended, or
superseded from time to time. In
particular, the report shall address
procedures designed to achieve the
following objectives: (i) That the
Interfund Rate will be higher than both
the Repo Rate and the OTD Rate but
lower than the Bank Loan Rate; (ii)
compliance with the collateral
requirements described in this
application; (iii) compliance with the
3 If the dispute involves Funds with separate
Boards, the Board of each Fund will select an
independent arbitrator that is satisfactory to each
Fund.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
19:12 Nov 29, 2005
Jkt 208001
percentage limitations on interfund
borrowing and lending; (iv) allocation of
interfund borrowing and lending
demand in an equitable manner and in
accordance with procedures established
by the Board: and (v) that the interest
rate on any Interfund Loan does not
exceed the interest rate on any third
party borrowings of a borrowing Fund at
the time of the Interfund Loan.
After the final report is filed, the
Fund’s external auditors, in connection
with their Fund audit examinations,
will continue to review the operation of
the Credit Facility for compliance with
the conditions of the Application and
their review will form the basis, in part,
of the auditor’s report on internal
accounting controls in Form N-SAR.
18. No Fund will participate in the
Credit Facility unless it has fully
disclosed in its prospectus or SAI or, in
the case of a closed-end Fund in its
registration statement or shareholder
reports, all material facts about its
intended participation.
19. The Board of each borrowing and
lending Fund will satisfy the fund
governance standards as defined in Rule
0–1(a)(7) under the Act by the
compliance date for the rule.
For the Commission, by the Division of
Investment Management, under delegated
authority.
Jonathan G. Katz,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 05–23492 Filed 11–29–05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8010–01–P
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
COMMISSION
[Release No. 34–52825; File No. SR–NASD–
2005–127]
Self-Regulatory Organizations;
National Association of Securities
Dealers, Inc.; Notice of Filing and
Immediate Effectiveness of Proposed
Rule Change To Modify NASD Rule
7010 To Change the Fee Structure for
the ‘‘Browse/Query’’ Function in the
Trade Reporting Service of the Nasdaq
Market Center
November 22, 2005.
Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(‘‘Act’’) 1 and Rule 19b–4 thereunder,2
notice is hereby given that on November
1, 2005, the National Association of
Securities Dealers, Inc. (‘‘NASD’’),
through its subsidiary, The Nasdaq
Stock Market, Inc. (‘‘Nasdaq’’), filed
with the Securities and Exchange
Commission (‘‘Commission’’) the
1 15
2 17
PO 00000
U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
CFR 240.19b–4.
Frm 00074
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
71873
proposed rule change as described in
Items I, II and III below, which Items
have been prepared by Nasdaq. Nasdaq
has designated this proposal as one
establishing or changing a due, fee or
other charge imposed by Nasdaq under
Section 19(b)(3)(A)(ii) of the Act,3 and
Rule 19b–4(f)(2) thereunder,4 which
renders the proposal effective upon
filing with the Commission. The
Commission is publishing this notice to
solicit comments on the proposed rule
change from interested persons.
I. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Terms of Substance of
the Proposed Rule Change
Nasdaq proposes to modify the fee
structure for the ‘‘Browse/Query’’
function in the trade reporting service of
the Nasdaq Market Center.5 Nasdaq will
implement the proposed rule change on
November 1, 2005.
The text of the proposed rule change
is available on the NASD’s Web site at
https://www.nasd.com, Office of the
Secretary, NASD, and at the
Commission’s Public Reference Room.
II. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule
Change
In its filing with the Commission,
Nasdaq included statements concerning
the purpose of and basis for the
proposed rule change and discussed any
comments it received on the proposed
rule change. The text of these statements
may be examined at the places specified
in Item IV below. Nasdaq has prepared
summaries, set forth in Sections A, B,
and C below, of the most significant
aspects of such statements.
A. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule
Change
1. Purpose
Nasdaq customers using the trade
reporting service of the Nasdaq Market
Center can view a summary of their
trade reporting activity by using the
‘‘Browse/Query’’ function of the Nasdaq
Workstation.6 The legacy ‘‘Browse/
Query’’ function would only display 18
records per request. In order to view the
next 18 records, Nasdaq customers
would have to use the ‘‘More’’ function.
3 15
U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A)(ii).
CFR 240.19b–4(f)(2).
5 The proposed rule change applies only to NASD
member firms.
6 The ‘‘Browse/Query’’ function is also provided
in Nasdaq Workstation II (NWII) and application
protocol interface (API) services. NWII and API
services, however, will be retired as of November
30, 2005 and December 31, 2005 respectively.
4 17
E:\FR\FM\30NON1.SGM
30NON1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 229 (Wednesday, November 30, 2005)]
[Notices]
[Pages 71867-71873]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-23492]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
[Investment Company Act Release No. 27166; 812-12909]
AEW Real Estate Income Fund, et al.; Notice of Application
Date: November 23, 2005.
AGENCY: Securities and Exchange Commission (``SEC'' or ``Commission'').
ACTION: Notice of application for an order under section 12(d)(1)(J) of
the Investment Company Act of 1940 (the ``Act'') for an exemption from
section 12(d)(1) of the Act, under sections 6(c) and 17(b) of the Act
for an exemption from section 17(a) of the Act, under section 6(c) of
the Act for an exemption from sections 18(f) and 21(b) of the Act, and
under section 17(d) of the Act and Rule 17d-1 under the Act to permit
certain joint arrangements.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Summary of Application: Applicants request an order that would
permit certain registered management investment companies to invest
cash balances in affiliated money market funds and to participate in a
joint lending and borrowing facility.
Applicants: AEW Real Estate Income Fund, IXIS Advisor Funds Trust I
(formerly CDC Nvest Funds Trust I), IXIS Advisor Funds Trust II
(formerly CDC Nvest Funds Trust II), IXIS Advisor Funds Trust III
(formerly CDC Nvest Funds Trust III), IXIS Advisor Funds Trusts IV
(formerly CDC Nvest Companies Trust I), IXIS Advisor Cash Management
Trust (formerly CDC Nvest Cash Management Trust), Harris Associates
Investment Trust, Loomis Sayles Funds I (formerly Loomis Sayles
Investment Trust), Loomis Sayles Funds II (formerly Loomis Sayles
Funds), Delafield Fund, Inc., Institutional Daily Income Fund, Cortland
Trust, Inc., and Short Term Income Fund, Inc. (each, a ``Trust,'' and
each Trust on behalf of itself and its existing series, an ``Existing
Fund''); AEW Management and Advisers, L.P., IXIS Asset Management
Advisors, L.P. (formerly CDC IXIS Asset Management Advisers, L.P.),
Harris Associates L.P., Loomis, Sayles & Company, L.P., and Reich &
Tang Asset Management, LLC (each, an ``Applicant Adviser'').
Filing Dates: The application was filed on December 12, 2002, and
amended on November 2, 2005.
Hearing or Notification of Hearing: An order granting the
application will be issued unless the Commission orders a hearing.
Interested persons may request a hearing by writing to the Commission's
Secretary and serving Applicants with a copy of the request, personally
or by mail. Hearing requests should be received by the Commission by
5:30 p.m. on December 20, 2005 and should be accompanied by proof of
service on the Applicants in the form of an affidavit or, for lawyers,
a certificate of service. Hearing requests should state the nature of
the writer's interest, the reason for the request, and the issues
contested. Persons who wish to be notified of a hearing may request
notification by writing to the Commission's Secretary.
ADDRESSES: Secretary, SEC, 100 F Street, NE., Washington, DC 20549-
9303; Applicants, c/o Coleen Downs Dinneen, Esq., IXIS Asset Advisors,
L.P., 399 Boylston Street, Boston, MA 02116.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Deepak T. Pai, Senior Counsel, at
(202) 551-6876, or Stacy L. Fuller, Branch Chief, at (202) 551-6821
(Division of Investment Management, Office of Investment Company
Regulation).
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The following is a summary of the
Application. The complete application may be obtained for a fee at the
SEC's Public Reference Branch, 100 F Street, NE., Washington, DC 20549-
0102 at telephone (202) 551-5850.
Applicants' Representations
1. Each of the Existing Funds is a management investment company
registered under the Act, and is organized as a Massachusetts business
trust or a Maryland corporation. All but one of the Existing Funds are
open-end investment companies (``open-end Funds''); the AEW Real Estate
Income Fund is a closed-end investment company (``closed-end Fund'').
Certain of the open-end Funds are money market funds subject to the
requirements of Rule 2a-7 under the Act (each, a ``Central Fund''). Any
Funds that are not Central Funds are referred to herein as
``Participating Funds.''
2. Applicants request that any relief granted pursuant to the
Application also apply to any future series of the Trusts and to any
other existing or future registered management investment companies, or
series thereof, for which an Applicant Adviser, or a company
controlling, controlled by, or under common control with an Applicant
Adviser (together with the Applicant Advisers, the ``Advisers''), acts
as investment adviser or sub-adviser (``Future Funds'' and together
with the Existing Funds, the ``Funds'').\1\ Each Applicant Adviser is
registered as an investment adviser under the Investment Advisers Act
of 1940, and is an investment adviser to one or more of the Existing
Funds. Each Applicant Adviser is an indirect wholly-owned subsidiary of
IXIS Asset Management North America, L.P. Each Adviser, as the primary
investment adviser or as subadviser to a Participating Fund is, and
will be, responsible for the investment of Cash Balances, as defined
below.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ All existing Funds that presently intend to rely on the
order are named as Applicants. Any existing or future Fund that
subsequently relies on the order will comply with the terms and
conditions in the Application.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
[[Page 71868]]
A. Investment of Cash Balances in the Central Funds
1. Each Participating Fund has, or may be expected to have, cash
reserves that have not been invested in portfolio securities
(``Uninvested Cash'') held by its custodian. Uninvested Cash may result
from a wide variety of sources, including dividends or interest
received on portfolio securities, unsettled securities transactions,
strategic reserves, matured investments, liquidations of investment
securities, and new investor monies. In addition, certain of the
Participating Funds also may participate in a securities lending
program (``Securities Lending Program'') under which the Participating
Funds lend their securities to registered broker-dealers or other
institutional investors. These loans are continuously secured by
collateral equal at all times to at least the market value of the
securities loaned. Collateral for these loans may include cash (``Cash
Collateral,'' and together with Uninvested Cash, ``Cash Balances'').
Any Securities Lending Program, including any investment of Cash
Collateral will comply with all present and future Commission and staff
positions regarding securities lending arrangements.
2. Applicants request an order to permit each Participating Fund to
use its Cash Balances to purchase shares of one or more of the Central
Funds that are in the same group of investment companies (as defined in
section 12(d)(1)(G) of the Act) as the Participating Fund, and each
Central Fund to sell its shares to, and redeem its shares from,
Participating Funds that are in the same group of investment companies
as the Central Fund (``Cash Sweep''). Investment by a Participating
Fund of Cash Balances in shares of the Central Funds will be in
accordance with each Participating Fund's investment restrictions and
will be consistent with each Participating Fund's policies as set forth
in its prospectus or statement of additional information (``SAI'').
Applicants believe that by investing Cash Balances in the Central
Funds, Participating Funds may reduce their transaction costs, create
more liquidity, increase returns, and diversify holdings.
3. In connection with the proposed Cash Sweep transactions,
applicants request an order under (i) section 12(d)(1)(J) of the Act
granting relief from sections 12(d)(1)(A) and (B) of the Act; (ii)
sections 6(c) and 17(b) of the Act granting relief from section 17(a)
of the Act; (iii) section 17(d) of the Act and Rule 17d-1 under the Act
to permit certain joint arrangements.
B. Interfund Lending Program
1. Under current arrangements, the Funds may lend money to banks,
brokers or other entities by entering into repurchase agreements or
purchasing other short-term instruments. In addition, the open-end
Funds may borrow money from the same or other banks for temporary or
emergency purposes to satisfy redemption requests or to cover
unanticipated cash shortfalls, such as trade ``fails'' in which cash
payments for a portfolio security sold by a Fund have been delayed. The
open-end Funds may have credit arrangements with their custodians under
which a custodian may, but is not obligated to, lend money to the Funds
to meet their temporary or emergency cash needs. The open-end Funds may
also borrow money from banks, brokers and other entities by entering
into reverse repurchase agreements and economically similar
transactions.
2. If an open-end Fund borrows money from any bank under its
current arrangements or under other arrangements, the Fund will pay
interest on the borrowed cash at a significantly higher rate than the
rate that would be earned by other (non-borrowing) Funds on repurchase
agreements and other short-term instruments of the same maturity as the
bank loan. Applicants believe this differential represents the bank's
profit for serving as a middleman between a borrower and lender. Other
bank loan arrangements, such as committed lines of credit, may require
a borrowing Fund to pay substantial commitment fees in addition to the
interest rate to be paid by the Fund on outstanding loans.
3. Applicants request an order that would permit Funds that are in
the same group of investment companies to enter into lending agreements
(``Interfund Lending Agreements'') to lend and borrow money for
temporary purposes directly to and from each other through a credit
facility (``Interfund Loans'').\2\ Applicants believe that the proposed
credit facility (``Credit Facility'') would both substantially reduce
the borrowing costs of an open-end Fund that sought to borrow money for
temporary or emergency purposes and enhance the ability of a lending
Fund to earn higher rates of interest on its short-term loans than it
might otherwise earn on high quality, short-term, interest-bearing
investments. Although the Credit Facility would substantially reduce an
open-end Fund's reliance on bank credit arrangements, the Funds may
continue to maintain bank loan facilities.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\2\ The Central Funds and closed-end Funds will participate in
the Credit Facility only as lenders.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
4. Applicants state that the Credit Facility would likely provide a
borrowing Fund with significant savings when its cash position is
insufficient to meet temporary cash requirements. This situation could
arise when redemptions exceed anticipated volumes and the borrowing
Fund has insufficient cash on hand to satisfy such redemptions. When
the Funds liquidate portfolio securities to meet redemption requests,
which normally are effected immediately, they often do not receive
payment in settlement for up to three days (or longer for certain
foreign transactions). The Credit Facility would provide a source of
immediate, short-term liquidity pending settlement of the sale of
portfolio securities.
5. Applicants also propose using the Credit Facility when a sale of
securities fails due to circumstances beyond a Fund's control, such as
delay in the delivery of cash to the Fund's custodian or improper
delivery instructions by the broker effecting the transaction (``sales
fails''). Sales fails may present a cash shortfall if the Fund has
undertaken to purchase a security with the proceeds from securities
sold. Under such circumstances, the Fund could fail on its intended
purchase due to lack of funds from the previous sale, resulting in
additional costs to the Fund, or sell a security on a same day
settlement basis, earning a lower return on the investment. Use of the
Credit Facility would enable the Funds to have access to immediate
short-term liquidity without incurring overdraft or other charges.
6. While bank borrowings generally could supply needed cash to
cover unanticipated redemptions and sales fails, under the Credit
Facility a borrowing Fund would pay lower interest rates than those
that would be payable under short-term loans offered by banks. In
addition, Funds making short-term cash loans directly to other Funds
would earn interest at a rate higher than they otherwise could obtain
from investing their cash in repurchase agreements or purchasing shares
of Central Funds. Thus, Applicants assert that the Credit Facility
would benefit both borrowing and lending Funds.
7. The interest rate to be charged on Interfund Loans (the
``Interfund Rate'') would be determined daily and would be the average
of (i) the higher of (x) the ``OTD Rate,'' as defined below, and (y)
the ``Repo Rate,'' as defined below, and (ii) the ``Bank Loan Rate,''
as defined below. The OTD Rate on any day would be the highest rate
available to the lending Funds from investments in
[[Page 71869]]
overnight time deposits. The Repo Rate on any day would be the highest
interest rate available to the lending Funds from investments in
overnight repurchase agreements. The Bank Loan Rate for any day would
be calculated by the Interfund Lending Team, as defined below,
according to a formula established by the board of trustees of each
Fund (``Board''), intended to approximate the lowest interest rate at
which short-term bank loans are available to the Funds. The formula
would be based upon a publicly available rate (e.g., Federal funds rate
plus 25 basis points) and would vary with that rate to reflect changing
bank loan rates. The initial formula and any subsequent modification
thereto would be subject to the approval of the Board of each Fund. In
addition, each Fund's Board periodically would review the continuing
appropriateness of reliance on the publicly available rate used to
determine the Bank Loan Rate, as well as the relationship between the
Bank Loan Rate and current bank loan rates available to the Funds.
8. The Credit Facility would be administered by personnel at Reich
& Tang Asset Management, LLC (``Reich & Tang'') who have accounting
experience, are members of its mutual fund administration group or the
financial analysis department, and who are not portfolio managers of a
Fund (``Interfund Lending Team''). No portfolio manager from any Fund
would participate in the administration of the Credit Facility. Under
the Credit Facility, the portfolio managers for each Fund could provide
standing instructions to participate daily as a borrower or lender. On
each business day the Interfund Lending Team would collect data on the
uninvested cash and borrowing requirements of the Funds from each
Fund's custodian, portfolio managers and/or administrators. Once it had
determined the aggregate amount of cash available for loans and
borrowing demand, the Interfund Lending Team would allocate loans among
borrowing Funds without any further communication from portfolio
managers. Applicants expect there to be far more available cash each
day than borrowing demand. After allocating cash for Interfund Loans,
the Interfund Lending Team would invest any remaining cash in
accordance with the standing instructions of the relevant Fund's
portfolio managers or return remaining amounts for investment directly
by the portfolio manager of the Fund.
9. The Interfund Lending Team would allocate borrowing demand and
cash available for lending among the Funds on what the Interfund
Lending Team believed to be an equitable basis, subject to certain
administrative requirements applicable to all Funds, such as the time
of filing requests to participate, minimum loan sizes, and the need to
minimize the number of transactions and associated administrative
costs. To reduce transaction costs, each Interfund Loan may be
allocated to minimize the number of participants necessary to complete
that Interfund Loan transaction. The Interfund Lending Team would not
solicit cash for loans from any Funds or publish or disseminate the
amount of current borrowing demand to portfolio managers.
10. The Interfund Lending Team would (i) monitor the interest rates
charged and the other terms and conditions of the Interfund Loans, (ii)
limit the borrowings and loans entered into by each Fund to ensure that
they comply with the Fund's investment policies and limitations, (iii)
ensure equitable treatment of each Fund under the Credit Facility, and
(iv) make quarterly reports to the Funds' Boards concerning any
transactions by the Funds under the Credit Facility and the Interfund
Rates. The method of allocation and related administrative procedures
would be approved by each Fund's Board, including a majority of
trustees who are not interested persons of the Fund, as defined in
section 2(a)(19) of the Act (``Independent Trustees''), to ensure that
both borrowing Funds and lending Funds participate in the Credit
Facility on an equitable basis.
11. Reich & Tang would administer the Credit Facility pursuant to a
form of Interfund Lending Agreement (to which Reich & Tang and each
Fund participating in the Credit Facility would be a party). Reich &
Tang would not receive any fees in connection with its administration
of the Credit Facility.
12. No Fund would participate in the Credit Facility unless (i) it
had fully disclosed all material information concerning the Credit
Facility in its prospectus or SAI, or, in the case of a closed-end
Fund, in its registration statement or shareholder reports, (ii) it had
obtained shareholder approval to participate in the Credit Facility, if
shareholder approval were required by the Fund's fundamental investment
policies, and (iii) the Fund's participation in the Credit Facility was
consistent with its investment policies and restrictions and its
organizational documents.
13. In connection with the Credit Facility, Applicants request an
order under (i) section 6(c) granting relief from sections 18(f) and
21(b) of the Act; (ii) section 12(d)(1)(J) granting relief from
sections 12(d)(1)(A) and (B) of the Act; (iii) sections 6(c) and 17(b)
granting relief from sections 17(a) and (iv) section 17(d) and Rule
17d-1 to permit certain joint arrangements.
Applicants' Legal Analysis
A. Investment of Cash Balances in the Central Funds
1. Section 12(d)(1)(A) provides that no registered investment
company may acquire securities of another investment company
representing more than 3% of the acquired company's outstanding voting
stock, more than 5% of the acquiring company's total assets, or,
together with the securities of other investment companies, more than
10% of the acquiring company's total assets. Section 12(d)(1)(B)
provides that no registered open-end investment company, its principal
underwriter or any broker or dealer, may sell the company's securities
to another investment company if the sale will cause the acquiring
company to own more than 3% of the acquired company's voting stock, or
if the sale will cause more than 10% of the acquired company's voting
stock to be owned by investment companies.
2. Section 12(d)(1)(J) provides that the Commission may exempt any
person, security, or transaction, or classes of persons, securities or
transactions, from any provision of section 12(d)(1) if and to the
extent that the exemption is consistent with the public interest and
the protection of investors. Applicants request relief under section
12(d)(1)(J) from the limitations of sections 12(d)(1)(A) and (B) to
permit each Participating Fund to invest its Cash Balances in the
Central Funds that are in the same group of investment companies as the
Participating Fund; under the requested order, the Participating Fund's
aggregate investment of Uninvested Cash in the Central Funds would not
exceed the greater of 25% of such Participating Fund's total assets or
$10 million.
3. Applicants state that the proposed investment of Cash Balances
in the Central Funds will not result in the abuses meant to be
addressed by section 12(d)(1), including undue influence, layering of
fees and complexity. Applicants state that because each Central Fund
will maintain a highly liquid portfolio and both the Participating Fund
and the Central Fund are in the same group of investment companies,
there should not be a concern about undue influence by a Participating
Fund over a Central Fund.
[[Page 71870]]
With respect to layering of fees, Applicants note that shares of the
Central Funds sold to the Participating Funds will not be subject to a
sales load, redemption fee, distribution fee under a plan adopted in
accordance with Rule 12b-1 under the Act, or service fee (as defined in
Rule 2830(b)(9) of the National Association of Securities Dealers, Inc.
Conduct Rules (``NASD Conduct Rules'')). Applicants state that if a
Central Fund offers more than one class of shares, a Participating Fund
will invest its Cash Balances only in the class with the lowest expense
ratio at the time of the investment. In addition, before the next
meeting of the Board of a Participating Fund is held for the purpose of
voting on any investment advisory contract, the investment adviser will
provide the Board with information on the approximate cost to the
adviser of, or portion of the advisory fee under the existing contract
attributable to, managing the Participating Fund's Uninvested Cash that
may be invested in the Central Funds. Further, before approving any
investment advisory contract for a Participating Fund, the Board of the
Participating Fund, including a majority of the Independent Trustees,
will consider to what extent, if any, the investment advisory fees
charged to the Participating Fund should be reduced to account for the
reduced services provided to the Participating Fund as a result of
Uninvested Cash being invested in the Central Funds. With regard to
complexity, Applicants include a condition that the Central Funds will
not acquire shares of any other investment company or company relying
on sections 3(c)(1) or 3(c)(7) of the Act in excess of the limits
contained in section 12(d)(1)(A), except as permitted by a Commission
order governing interfund loans.
4. Section 17(a) makes it unlawful for any affiliated person of a
registered investment company, or any affiliated person of the
affiliated person (``Second Tier Affiliate''), acting as principal,
knowingly to sell any security to or purchase any security from the
investment company. Section 2(a)(3) of the Act defines an ``affiliated
person'' to include any person directly or indirectly owning,
controlling, or holding with power to vote 5% or more of the
outstanding voting securities of the other person; any person directly
or indirectly controlling, controlled by, or under common control with
the other person; and, in the case of an investment company, its
investment adviser. Applicants state that because the Funds share a
common Adviser or have Advisers that are under common control, the
Funds may be deemed to be under common control and, thus, affiliated
persons of each other. In addition, applicants state that a
Participating Fund may acquire more than 5% of a Central Fund's
outstanding voting securities and, as a result, the Participating Fund
and the Central Fund may be deemed to be affiliated persons of each
other. The sale of shares by the Central Funds to the Participating
Funds and the redemption of such shares would thus be prohibited under
section 17(a).
5. Section 17(b) authorizes the Commission to exempt a transaction
from section 17(a) if the terms of the proposed transaction, including
the consideration to be paid or received, are reasonable and fair and
do not involve overreaching on the part of any person concerned, and
the proposed transaction is consistent with the policy of each
registered investment company concerned and with the general purposes
of the Act. Section 6(c) authorizes the Commission to exempt any person
or transaction from any provision of the Act if the exemption is
necessary or appropriate in the public interest and consistent with the
protection of investors and the purposes fairly intended by the policy
and provisions of the Act.
6. Applicants submit that the request for relief to permit the
purchase and redemption of shares of the Central Funds by the
Participating Funds satisfies the standards in sections 6(c) and 17(b).
Applicants note that shares of the Central Funds will be purchased and
redeemed at their net asset value, the same consideration paid and
received for these shares by any other shareholder. In addition,
Applicants state that the Participating Funds will retain their ability
to invest Cash Balances directly in money market or other instruments
as authorized by their respective investment objectives and policies if
they believe they can obtain a higher rate of return or for any other
reason. Each Central Fund reserves the right to discontinue selling
shares to any of the Participating Funds if its Board determines that
the sale will adversely affect its portfolio management and operations.
7. Section 17(d) and Rule 17d-1 prohibit any affiliated person of a
registered investment company, acting as principal, from participating
in or effecting any transaction in connection with any joint enterprise
or joint arrangement in which the investment company participates.
Applicants state that each Participating Fund (by purchasing shares of
the Central Funds), the Advisers (by managing the assets of the
Participating Funds and the Central Funds, including the Participating
Funds' investments in the Central Funds), and each Central Fund (by
selling shares to the Participating Funds) could be deemed to be
participants in a ``joint enterprise or other joint arrangement''
within the meaning of section 17(d) and Rule 17d-1.
8. Rule 17d-1 permits the Commission to approve a joint arrangement
covered by the terms of section 17(d). In determining whether to
approve a transaction, the Commission considers whether the investment
company's participation in the joint enterprise is consistent with the
provisions, policies, and purposes of the Act, and the extent to which
the participation is on a basis different from or less advantageous
than that of other participants. Applicants submit that investments by
the Participating Funds will be at net asset value and will be
indistinguishable from any other shareholder account maintained by the
Central Funds, and that the transactions will be consistent with the
Act. Applicants further submit that the arrangement is not intended to
increase the fees earned by the Advisers. Thus, applicants contend that
the proposed transactions meet the standards for relief under Rule 17d-
1.
B. Interfund Lending Program
1. Section 17(a)(3) of the Act generally prohibits any affiliated
person or Second-Tier Affiliate from borrowing money or other property
from a registered investment company. Section 21(b) generally prohibits
any registered management company from lending money or other property
to any person if that person controls or is under common control with
the company. As discussed above, Applicants believe that the Funds may
be deemed to be under common control and, as a result, prohibited from
participating in the Credit Facility because of sections 17(a)(3) and
21(b).
2. Applicants submit that sections 17(a)(3) and 21(b) were intended
to prevent a party with potential adverse interests to, and some
influence over the investment decisions of, a registered investment
company from causing or inducing the investment company to engage in
lending transactions that unfairly benefit that party and that are
detrimental to the best interests of the investment company and its
shareholders. Applicants assert that the proposed transactions do not
raise such concerns for the following reasons: (i) Reich & Tang would
receive no
[[Page 71871]]
compensation for administering the Credit Facility; (ii) all Interfund
Loans would consist only of uninvested cash reserves that the Fund
otherwise would invest in short-term repurchase agreements or other
short-term investments; (iii) the Interfund Loans would not involve a
greater risk than such other investments; (iv) the lending Fund would
earn interest on Interfund Loans at a rate higher than it could obtain
through such other investments; and (v) the borrowing Fund would pay
interest at a rate lower than otherwise available to it under bank loan
agreements and avoid commitment fees associated with committed lines of
credit. Moreover, Applicants believe that the other conditions proposed
would effectively preclude the possibility of any Fund obtaining undue
advantage over any other Fund.
3. Applicants also seek exemptions from section 17(a)(1) under
sections 6(c) and 17(b) and from section 12(d)(1) under section
12(d)(1)(J) with respect to the Credit Facility. Applicants state that
the obligation of a borrowing Fund to repay an Interfund Loan may
constitute a security under sections 17(a)(1) and 12(d)(1). Applicants
contend that the standards under sections 6(c), 17(b), and 12(d)(1)(J),
as stated above, are satisfied for all the reasons set forth in the two
preceding paragraphs in support of their request for relief from
sections 17(a)(3) and 21(b) and for the reasons set forth below.
4. As discussed above, Applicants state that section 12(d)(1) was
intended to prevent the pyramiding of investment companies in order to
avoid, among other things, duplicative costs and fees that are
generated by multiple layers of investment companies. Applicants submit
that the Credit Facility does not involve these types of abuses.
Regarding duplicative costs, Applicants state that Reich & Tang would
administer the Credit Facility pursuant to an Interfund Lending
Agreement between it and the relevant Fund and would not receive any
compensation for its services. Applicants further state that the
purpose of the Credit Facility is to provide economic benefits for all
participating Funds.
5. Section 18(f)(1) prohibits open-end investment companies from
issuing any senior security, except that a company may borrow from any
bank so long as immediately after the borrowing there is asset coverage
of at least 300% for all borrowings of the company. Under section 18(g)
of the Act, the term ``senior security'' includes any bond, debenture,
note, or similar obligation or instrument constituting a security and
evidencing indebtedness. Applicants request exemptive relief from
section 18(f)(1) to the limited extent necessary to implement the
Credit Facility (because the lending Funds are not banks).
6. Applicants believe that granting relief under section 6(c) is
appropriate. Based on the conditions and safeguards described in the
Application, Applicants also submit that to allow the Funds to borrow
from other Funds under the Credit Facility is consistent with the
purposes and policies of section 18(f)(1).
7. Applicants also request an order under Rule 17d-1 with respect
to the Credit Facility. Applicants state that the Credit Facility could
be deemed to be a ``joint enterprise or other joint arrangement''
within the meaning of section 17(d) and Rule 17d-1. Applicants submit
that the proposed transactions meet the standards of Rule 17d-1 because
the Credit Facility offers both reduced borrowing costs to borrowing
Funds and enhanced returns on loaned funds to lending Funds. Applicants
note that each Fund would have an equal opportunity to borrow and lend
on equal terms consistent with its investments policies and fundamental
investment limitations and that Reich & Tang would not receive any
compensation for administering the Credit Facility. Applicants
therefore believe that each Fund's participation in the Credit Facility
would be on terms that are no different from or less advantageous than
those of other participants.
Applicants' Conditions
Applicants agree that any order of the Commission granting the
requested relief will be subject to the following conditions:
A. Investment of Cash Balances in the Central Funds
1. The shares of the Central Funds sold to and redeemed by the
Participating Funds will not be subject to a sales load, redemption
fee, distribution fee under a plan adopted in accordance with Rule 12b-
1 under the Act, or service fee (as defined in NASD Conduct Rule
2830(b)(9)).
2. No Central Fund will acquire securities of any other investment
company or company relying on section 3(c)(1) or 3(c)(7) of the Act in
excess of the limits contained in section 12(d)(1)(A) of the Act,
except as permitted by an SEC order governing interfund loans.
3. Before the next meeting of the Board of a Participating Fund is
held for the purpose of voting on an investment advisory contract of
the Participating Fund under section 15 of the Act, the investment
adviser to the Participating Fund will provide the Board with specific
information regarding the approximate cost to the investment adviser
of, or the portion of the investment advisory fee under the existing
investment advisory agreement attributable to, managing the Uninvested
Cash of the Participating Fund that may be invested in the Central
Funds. Before approving any investment advisory contract for a
Participating Fund, the Board of the Participating Fund, including a
majority of the Independent Trustees, shall consider to what extent, if
any, the investment advisory fees charged to the Participating Fund
should be reduced to account for reduced services provided to the
Participating Fund as a result of Uninvested Cash being invested in the
Central Funds. The minute books of the Participating Fund will record
fully the Board's consideration in approving the investment advisory
contract, including the considerations relating to the fees referred to
above.
4. A Participating Fund may invest Uninvested Cash in, and hold
shares of, the Central Funds only to the extent that such Participating
Fund's aggregate investment of Uninvested Cash in the Central Funds
does not exceed the greater of 25% of the Participating Fund's total
assets or $10 million.
5. Each Participating Fund and Central Fund shall be advised by an
Adviser. Each Participating Fund may only invest in Central Funds that
are in the same group of investment companies, as defined in section
12(d)(1)(G) of the Act, as the Participating Fund. A Participating Fund
that is subadvised by an Adviser may rely on the order provided that
the Adviser manages Cash Balances.
6. Investment of Cash Balances by a Participating Fund in shares of
the Central Funds will be consistent with each Participating Fund's
respective investment restrictions and policies as set forth in its
prospectus and SAI or, in the case of a closed-end Fund, in its
registration statement or shareholder reports.
7. Before a Participating Fund may participate in a Securities
Lending Program, a majority of the Board, including a majority of the
Independent Trustees, will approve the Participating Fund's
participation in the Securities Lending Program. The Board also will
evaluate the Securities Lending Program and its results no less
frequently than annually and determine that any investment of Cash
Collateral in the Central Funds is in the best interest of the
shareholders of the Participating Fund.
[[Page 71872]]
8. The Board of any Participating Fund will satisfy the fund
governance standards as defined in rule 0-1(a)(7) under the Act by the
compliance date for the rule.
B. Interfund Lending Under the Credit Facility
1. The interest rate to be charge to the Funds under the Credit
Facility will be the average of (i) the higher of (x) the OTD Rate and
(y) the Repo Rate and (ii) the Bank Loan Rate.
2. The Interfund Lending Team on each business day will compare the
Bank Loan Rate with the Repo Rate and the OTD Rate and will make cash
available for Interfund Loans only if the Interfund Rate is (i) more
favorable to the lending Fund than both the Repo Rate and the OTD Rate
and (ii) more favorable to the borrowing Fund than the Bank Loan Rate.
3. If a Fund has outstanding borrowings, then any Interfund Loans
to the Fund (i) will be at an interest rate equal to or lower than any
outstanding bank loan, (ii) will be secured at least on an equal
priority basis with at least an equivalent percentage of collateral to
loan value as any outstanding bank loan that requires collateral, (iii)
will have a maturity no longer than any outstanding bank loan (and in
no event more than seven days) and (iv) will provide that if an event
of default occurs under any agreement evidencing an outstanding bank
loan to the Fund, that event of default will automatically (without
need for action or notice by the lending Fund) constitute an immediate
event of default under the Interfund Lending Agreement. This event of
default will entitle the lending Fund to call the Interfund Loan and
exercise all rights with respect to the collateral, if any. Such call
will be made if a lending bank or banks exercise their rights to call
their loan under an agreement with the borrowing Fund.
4. A Fund may make an unsecured borrowing through the Credit
Facility if its outstanding borrowings from all sources immediately
after the interfund borrowing total 10% or less of its total assets,
provided that if the Fund has a secured loan outstanding from any other
lender, including but not limited to another Fund, the Fund's interfund
borrowing will be secured on at least an equal priority basis with at
least an equivalent percentage of collateral to loan value as any
outstanding loan that requires collateral. If a Fund's total
outstanding borrowings immediately after an interfund borrowing would
be greater than 10% of its total assets, the Fund may borrow through
the Credit Facility only on a secured basis. A Fund may not borrow
through the Credit Facility or from any other source if its total
outstanding borrowings immediately after the interfund borrowing would
be more than 33\1/3\% of its total assets.
5. Before any Fund that has outstanding interfund borrowings may,
through additional borrowings, cause its outstanding borrowings from
all sources to exceed 10% of its total assets, the Fund must first
secure each outstanding Interfund Loan by the pledge of segregated
collateral with a market value at least equal to 102% of the
outstanding principal value of the loan. If the total outstanding
borrowings of a Fund with outstanding Interfund Loans exceed 10% of its
total assets for any other reason (such as a decline in net asset value
or shareholder redemptions), the Fund will within one business day
thereafter (i) repay all of its outstanding Interfund Loans, (ii)
reduce its outstanding indebtedness to 10% or less of its total assets
or (iii) secure each outstanding Interfund Loan by a pledge of
segregated collateral with a market value at least equal to 102% of the
outstanding principal value of the loan until the Fund's total
outstanding borrowings cease to exceed 10% of its total assets, at
which time the collateral called for by this condition (5) will no
longer be required. Until each Interfund Loan that is outstanding any
time that a Fund's total outstanding borrowings exceed 10% is repaid or
the Fund's total outstanding borrowings cease to exceed 10% of its
total assets, the Fund will mark the value of the collateral to market
each day and will pledge such additional collateral as is necessary to
maintain the market value of the collateral that secures each
outstanding Interfund Loan at least equal to 102% of the outstanding
principal value of the Interfund Loan.
6. No Fund may loan funds through the Credit Facility if the loan
would cause its aggregate outstanding loans through the Credit Facility
to exceed 15% of its net assets at the time of the loan.
7. A Fund's Interfund Loans to any one Fund shall not exceed 5% of
the lending Fund's net assets.
8. The duration of Interfund Loans will be limited to the time
required to receive payment for securities sold, but in no event more
than seven days. Loans effected within seven days of each other will be
treated as separate loan transactions for purposes of this condition
(8).
9. Unless the Fund has a policy that prevents it from borrowing for
other than temporary or emergency purposes, its borrowing through the
Credit Facility, as measured on the day the most recent Interfund Loan
was made to it, will not exceed the greater of 125% of the Fund's total
net cash redemptions or 102% of sales fails for the preceding seven
calendar days.
10. Each Interfund Loan may be called on one business day's notice
by the lending Fund and may be repaid on any day by the borrowing Fund.
11. A Fund's participation in the Credit Facility must be
consistent with its investment policies and limitations and
organizational documents.
12. The Interfund Lending Team will calculate total Fund borrowing
and lending demand through the Credit Facility, and allocate Interfund
Loans on an equitable basis among Funds, without the intervention of
any portfolio manager of any Fund. The Interfund Lending Team will not
solicit cash for the Credit Facility from any Fund or prospectively
publish or disseminate loan demand data to portfolio managers. The
Interfund Lending Team will invest amounts remaining after satisfaction
of borrowing demand in accordance with standing instructions from
portfolio managers or return remaining amounts for investment directly
by the relevant Fund's portfolio managers.
13. The Interfund Lending Team will monitor the interest rates
charged and the other terms and conditions of the Interfund Loans and
will make a quarterly report to each Fund's Board concerning the
participation of the Fund in the Credit Facility and the terms and
other conditions of any extensions of credit under the Credit Facility.
14. Each Fund's Board, including a majority of the Independent
Trustees: (i) Will review no less frequently than quarterly the Fund's
participation in the Credit Facility during the preceding quarter for
compliance with the conditions of any order permitting such
transactions; (ii) will establish the Bank Loan Rate formula used to
determine the interest rate on Interfund Loans, and review no less
frequently than annually the continuing appropriateness of such Bank
Loan Rate formula; and (iii) will review no less frequently than
annually the continuing appropriateness of the Fund's participation in
the Credit Facility.
15. If an Interfund Loan is not paid according to its terms and
such default is not cured within two business days from its maturity or
from the time the lending Fund makes a demand for payment under the
provisions of the Interfund Lending Agreement, the Interfund Lending
Team promptly will refer such loan for arbitration to an independent
arbitrator who has been selected by the Board of any Fund involved in
the loan who will serve as
[[Page 71873]]
arbitrator of disputes concerning Interfund Loans.\3\ The arbitrator
will resolve any problem promptly, and the arbitrator's decision will
be binding on both Funds. The arbitrator will submit, at least
annually, a written report to the Board of the Funds involved in any
such dispute setting forth a description of the nature of any dispute
and the actions taken by the Funds to resolve the dispute.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\3\ If the dispute involves Funds with separate Boards, the
Board of each Fund will select an independent arbitrator that is
satisfactory to each Fund.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
16. Each Fund will maintain and preserve for a period of not less
than six years from the end of the fiscal year in which any Interfund
Loan occurred, the first two years in an easily accessible place, a
written record of all such transactions setting forth a description of
the terms of the transaction, including the amount, the maturity and
the rate of interest on the loan, the OTD Rate, the rate of interest
available at the time on overnight repurchase agreements and bank
borrowings, and such other information presented to the Fund's Board in
connection with the review required by conditions (13) and (14).
17. The Interfund Lending Team will prepare and submit to the Board
of each Fund for review an initial report describing the operations of
the Credit Facility and the procedures to be implemented to ensure that
all Funds are treated fairly. After the Credit Facility commences
operations, the Interfund Lending Team will report to the Board
quarterly on the operations of the Credit Facility.
In addition, for two years following the commencement of the Credit
Facility, the independent public accountant for each Fund shall prepare
an annual report that evaluates the Interfund Lending Team's assertion
that it has established procedures reasonably designed to achieve
compliance with the conditions of the order. The report shall be
prepared in accordance with the Statements on Standards for Attestation
Engagements No. 10 and it shall be filed pursuant to Item 77Q3 of Form
N-SAR, as such Statements or Form may be revised, amended, or
superseded from time to time. In particular, the report shall address
procedures designed to achieve the following objectives: (i) That the
Interfund Rate will be higher than both the Repo Rate and the OTD Rate
but lower than the Bank Loan Rate; (ii) compliance with the collateral
requirements described in this application; (iii) compliance with the
percentage limitations on interfund borrowing and lending; (iv)
allocation of interfund borrowing and lending demand in an equitable
manner and in accordance with procedures established by the Board: and
(v) that the interest rate on any Interfund Loan does not exceed the
interest rate on any third party borrowings of a borrowing Fund at the
time of the Interfund Loan.
After the final report is filed, the Fund's external auditors, in
connection with their Fund audit examinations, will continue to review
the operation of the Credit Facility for compliance with the conditions
of the Application and their review will form the basis, in part, of
the auditor's report on internal accounting controls in Form N-SAR.
18. No Fund will participate in the Credit Facility unless it has
fully disclosed in its prospectus or SAI or, in the case of a closed-
end Fund in its registration statement or shareholder reports, all
material facts about its intended participation.
19. The Board of each borrowing and lending Fund will satisfy the
fund governance standards as defined in Rule 0-1(a)(7) under the Act by
the compliance date for the rule.
For the Commission, by the Division of Investment Management,
under delegated authority.
Jonathan G. Katz,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 05-23492 Filed 11-29-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8010-01-P