Special Situations Fund III, L.P., et al., Notice of Application, 67762-67765 [05-22163]
Download as PDF
67762
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 215 / Tuesday, November 8, 2005 / Notices
the focus of these meetings will be
discussion of working group findings
and recommendations. The Panel
welcomes oral public comments at any
of these meetings and has reserved one
hour for this purpose at each meeting.
Members of the public wishing to
address the Panel during the meeting
must contact Ms. Anne Terry, in writing,
as soon as possible to reserve time (see
contact information above).
(b) Posting of Draft Reports: Members
of the public are encouraged to regularly
visit the Panel’s Web site for draft
reports. Currently, the working groups
are staggering the posting of various
sections of their draft reports at https://
www.acqnet.gov/aap under ‘‘Working
Group Reports.’’
(c) Availability of Materials for the
Meetings: Please see the Panel’s Web
site for any available materials,
including draft agendas and minutes
(https://www.acqnet.gov/aap).
Questions/issues of particular interest to
the Panel are also available to the public
on this Web site on its front page,
including ‘‘Questions for Government
Buying Agencies,’’ ‘‘Questions for
Contractors that Sell Commercial Goods
or Services to the Government,’’
‘‘Questions for Commercial
Organizations,’’ and an issue raised by
one Panel member regarding the rules of
interpretation and performance of
contracts and liabilities of the parties
entitled ‘‘Proposal for Public
Comment.’’ The Panel encourages the
public to address any of these
questions/issues when presenting either
oral public comments or written
statements to the Panel.
(d) Procedures for Providing Public
Comments: It is the policy of the Panel
to accept written public comments of
any length, and to accommodate oral
public comments whenever possible.
The Panel Staff expects that public
statements presented at Panel meetings
will be focused on the Panel’s statutory
charter and working group topics, and
not be repetitive of previously
submitted oral or written statements,
and that comments will be relevant to
the issues under discussion.
Oral Comments: Speaking times will
be confirmed by Panel staff on a ‘‘firstcome/first-served’’ basis. To
accommodate as many speakers as
possible, oral public comments must be
no longer than 10 minutes. Because
Panel members may ask questions,
reserved times will be approximate.
Interested parties must contact Ms.
Anne Terry, in writing (via mail, e-mail,
or fax identified above for Ms. Terry) at
least one week prior to the meeting in
order to be placed on the public speaker
list for the meeting. Oral requests for
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:11 Nov 07, 2005
Jkt 208001
speaking time will not be taken.
Speakers are requested to bring extra
copies of their comments and
presentation slides for distribution to
the Panel at the meeting. Speakers
wishing to use a Power Point
presentation must e-mail the
presentation to Ms. Terry one week in
advance of the meeting.
Written Comments: Although written
comments are accepted until the date of
the meeting (unless otherwise stated),
written comments should be received by
the Panel Staff at least one week prior
to the meeting date so that the
comments may be made available to the
Panel for their consideration prior to the
meeting. Written comments should be
supplied to the DFO at the address/
contact information given in this FR
Notice in one of the following formats
(Adobe Acrobat, WordPerfect, Word, or
Rich Text files, in IBM–PC/Windows
98/2000/XP format).
Please note: Since the Panel operates under
the provisions of the Federal Advisory
Committee Act, as amended, all public
presentations will be treated as public
documents and will be made available for
public inspection, up to and including being
posted on the Panel’s Web site.
(e) Meeting Accommodations:
Individuals requiring special
accommodation to access the public
meetings listed above should contact
Ms. Auletta at least five business days
prior to the meeting so that appropriate
arrangements can be made.
Laura Auletta,
Designated Federal Officer (Executive
Director), Acquisition Advisory Panel.
[FR Doc. 05–22238 Filed 11–7–05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3110–01–P
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
COMMISSION
[Investment Company Act Release No.
27140; 812–13190]
Special Situations Fund III, L.P., et al.,
Notice of Application
November 2, 2005.
Securities and Exchange
Commission (‘‘Commission’’).
ACTION: Notice of application for an
order under section 17(b) of the
Investment Company Act of 1940 (the
‘‘Act’’) for an exemption from section
17(a) of the Act.
AGENCY:
Applicants: Special Situations Fund
III, L.P. (‘‘SSF III’’), Special Situations
Fund III QP, L.P. (‘‘SSF QP,’’ and
together with SSF III, the ‘‘Funds’’) and
MGP Advisers Limited Partnership
(‘‘Adviser’’).
PO 00000
Frm 00105
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Summary of Application: Applicants
request an order to permit certain
purchase and sale transactions in
connection with a proposed division of
a registered closed-end management
investment company into two separate
companies (the ‘‘Transaction’’).
Filing Dates: The application was
filed on May 19, 2005, and amended on
November 2, 2005.
Hearing or Notification of Hearing: An
order granting the application will be
issued unless the Commission orders a
hearing. Interested persons may request
a hearing by writing to the
Commission’s Secretary and serving
applicants with a copy of the request,
personally or by mail. Hearing requests
should be received by the Commission
by 5:30 p.m. on November 25, 2005, and
should be accompanied by proof of
service on the applicants, in the form of
an affidavit or, for lawyers, a certificate
of service. Hearing requests should state
the nature of the writer’s interest, the
reason for the request, and the issues
contested. Persons may request
notification of a hearing by writing to
the Commission’s Secretary.
ADDRESSES: Secretary, U.S. Securities
and Exchange Commission, 100 F
Street, NE., Washington, DC 20549–
0609. Applicants, c/o Austin W. Marxe,
MGP Advisers Limited Partnership, 153
East 53rd Street, 55th Floor, New York,
NY 10022.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Bruce R. MacNeil, Senior Counsel (202–
551–6817), or Stacy L. Fuller, Branch
Chief (202–551–6821) (Office of
Investment Company Regulation,
Division of Investment Management).
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The
following is a summary of the
application. The complete application
may be obtained for a fee from the
Commission’s Public Reference Branch,
100 F Street, NE., Washington, DC
20549–0102 (202–551–5850).
Applicants’ Representations
1. SSF III, a Delaware limited
partnership, is a closed-end
management investment company that
is registered under the Act and operates
as an ‘‘interval fund’’ under rule 23e–3
under the Act. Partnership interests
(‘‘Units’’) in SSF III are not registered
under the Securities Act of 1933 (‘‘1933
Act’’) and are sold in private offerings
pursuant to Regulation D under the
1933 Act generally to ‘‘accredited
investors,’’ as defined in Regulation D.
Each investor in SSF III that pays the
Adviser an incentive allocation is also a
‘‘qualified client,’’ as defined in rule
205–3 under the Investment Advisers
Act of 1940, as amended (‘‘Advisers
E:\FR\FM\08NON1.SGM
08NON1
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 215 / Tuesday, November 8, 2005 / Notices
Act’’). Under SSF III’s fundamental
policies and rule 23c–3, as well as its
partnership agreement (the ‘‘Partnership
Agreement’’), SSF III conducts semiannual repurchase offers for between
10% and 25% of outstanding Units, as
determined by the individual general
partners of SSF III (each, an ‘‘Individual
General Partner,’’ collectively, the
‘‘Board,’’ and the Board together with
the Adviser, the ‘‘General Partners’’),
who are responsible for the overall
management and supervision of SSF III.
SSF III may also sell Units to existing
Unit holders with a limited partnership
interest (‘‘Limited Partners,’’ and
together with the General Partners,
‘‘Partners’’) and other investors in the
future. SSF III’s investment objectives
are to maximize long-term capital
appreciation by investing primarily in
equity securities and securities with
equity features, which are traded on a
national securities exchange or Nasdaq.
As of June 30, 2005, SSF III had
approximately 451 Unit holders (92% of
whom were qualified purchasers, as
defined in section 2(a)(51) of the Act
(‘‘Qualified Purchasers,’’ and such Unit
holders, ‘‘Qualified Purchaser Unit
Holders’’)) and approximately $500
million in assets. SSF III’s fees and
expenses for the year ended December
31, 2004, as a percentage of average net
assets, totaled 5.41% (including the
Adviser’s incentive allocation of 20% of
net profits).1
2. SSF QP, a Delaware limited
partnership that was formed on May 17,
2005 to effect the Transaction is
excluded from regulation under the Act
pursuant to section 3(c)(7) of the Act.2
SSF QP has the same investment
objectives as SSF III. SSF QP will have
no assets until after the consummation
of the Transaction. SSF QP will have the
same administration fee and incentive
allocation structure as SSF III.
Applicants estimate that the fees and
expenses for SSF QP (excluding any
incentive allocation to the Adviser but
including all other fees) would have
been on a pro forma basis approximately
0.81% of average net assets for the
calendar year ended December 31,
2004.3 Beginning June 30, 2006, limited
1 Excluding
the Adviser’s incentive allocation,
SSF III’s fees totaled approximately .84% of average
net assets. The Adviser’s incentive allocation is
subject to a high water mark.
2 SSF QP has been formed in compliance with,
and will be bound by the terms and conditions of,
the application.
3 For purposes of projecting the effects of the
Transaction, the Applicants have assumed the Cash
Repurchase Offer and the Exchange Tender Offer
(each as defined below) were consummated as
follows (collectively, the ‘‘Transaction Participation
Assumptions’’): (a) All Qualified Purchaser Unit
Holders other than the Adviser and the Principals
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:11 Nov 07, 2005
Jkt 208001
partners of SSF QP may redeem their
Units of SSF QP semi-annually on June
30 and December 31 of each calendar
year, by providing written notice to the
Adviser on or before June 15 or
December 15, respectively, of such
calendar year. The Adviser has the right
to limit the aggregate redemptions of
Units of SSF QP by limited partners in
any semi-annual fiscal period to 10% of
the outstanding Units at the last day of
the period (after the redetermination of
Units to reflect SSF QP’s profit or loss
as of the end of such period).
3. The Adviser, a Delaware limited
partnership, is registered as an
investment adviser under the Advisers
Act. The Adviser is the investment
adviser to the Funds. The Adviser is
also a General Partner of SSF III and
will be the general partner of SSF QP
upon completion of the Transaction.
AWM Investment Company, Inc.
(‘‘AWM’’) is the general partner of the
Adviser and Austin W. Marxe, David
Greenhouse and Adam Stettner are
limited partners of the Adviser (each,
including AWM, a ‘‘Principal’’). The
Adviser and Mr. Marxe each own a
general partnership interest in SSF III
totaling in the aggregate approximately
7% of outstanding Units. The other
Principals each own a limited
partnership interest in SSF III totaling
approximately less than 1% of
outstanding Units.
4. A provision in the applicable
Treasury regulations,4 which has
allowed SSF III to operate as a registered
investment company but not be taxed as
a publicly traded partnership for federal
income tax purposes (‘‘Grandfather
Clause’’), will expire on December 31,
2005.5 Unless SSF III satisfies a safe
harbor in the Treasury regulations, any
future determination of whether it
(as defined below) fully participated in the
Exchange Tender Offer; (b) approximately 4.2% of
the outstanding Units of SSF III (representing half
of the Units of non-Qualified Purchaser Unit
Holders (as defined below)) participated in the Cash
Repurchase Offer; (c) the Adviser did not
participate in the Cash Repurchase Offer; (d) the
Adviser, and two Principals, Austin Marxe and
David Greenhouse, participated in the Exchange
Tender Offer in the same proportion as other
Limited Partners, as further described below; and
(e) Adam Stettner, a Principal, did not participate
in the Cash Repurchase Offer or the Exchange
Tender Offer. The net result of the Transaction
Participation Assumptions is that approximately
91.3% of SSF III’s outstanding Units would be
exchanged for Units of SSF QP, approximately
4.5% would remain in SSF III, and approximately
4.2% would be repurchased for cash. There can be
no assurance that participation in the Cash
Repurchase Offer and the Exchange Tender Offer
will be similar to the Transaction Participation
Assumptions.
4 26 CFR 1.7704–1.
5 A publicly traded partnership is generally taxed
as a corporation, i.e. subject to a double level of
taxation.
PO 00000
Frm 00106
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
67763
would be taxed as a publicly traded
partnership would be made by applying
a facts-and-circumstances test. To
continue to rely on a safe harbor and
thereby avoid the uncertainty of a factsand-circumstances test, SSF III may
amend its repurchase policies to, among
other things, reduce the repurchase offer
amount on a semi-annual and annual
basis to, respectively, 5% and 10% of
outstanding Units.6 Amending the
repurchase policies as applicants intend
to do to qualify for the safe harbor is not
satisfactory to the largest Limited
Partners, all of whom are Qualified
Purchasers, because of the resulting
decrease in the liquidity of their Units.
5. Applicants propose to conduct the
Transaction to divide SSF III into two
separate companies to accommodate the
needs of the Qualified Purchaser Unit
Holders and those Unit holders that are
not Qualified Purchasers (‘‘nonQualified Purchaser Unit Holders’’).7
Pursuant to the Transaction, SSF III
would conduct an exchange offer for the
Units of Qualified Purchaser Unit
Holders in which they may tender their
Units of SSF III and receive, in
exchange, Units of SSF QP (‘‘Exchange
Tender Offer’’). The Exchange Tender
Offer will not be a taxable transaction
for the Funds. In the Transaction, (a)
SSF III would accept from Qualified
Purchaser Unit Holders who elect to
participate in the Exchange Tender
Offer (‘‘Exchanging Holders’’) Units of
SSF III, (b) SSF III would transfer to SSF
QP, on a strict pro rata basis, portfolio
securities having a total net asset value
(‘‘NAV’’) equal to the total NAV of the
SSF III Units, as calculated on December
30, 2005 (the ‘‘Valuation Date’’),
tendered in the Exchange Tender Offer,
(c) SSF III would receive Units of SSF
QP having a total NAV equal to both the
total NAV of the SSF III Units tendered
by Exchanging Holders and the total
NAV of the portfolio securities
transferred from SSF III to SSF QP,8 and
(d) SSF III would distribute the SSF QP
Units to Exchanging Holders on a pro
rata basis.9
6. Simultaneous with the Exchange
Tender Offer, SSF III would conduct a
6 Changes to SSF III’s repurchase policies will be
subject to the approval of a majority of the
outstanding Units held by Limited Partners after
completion of the Offers, as defined below.
7 The Transaction is subject to the approval of a
majority of the outstanding Units held by Limited
Partners.
8 SSF III is a Qualified Purchaser.
9 Limited Partners and General Partners that
tender in the Exchange Tender Offer will receive,
respectively, limited and general partnership Units
of SSF QP. The Adviser and two Principals will
participate in the Exchange Tender Offer, tendering
the same percentage of the Units they hold as all
other Limited Partners tender of the Units they
hold.
E:\FR\FM\08NON1.SGM
08NON1
67764
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 215 / Tuesday, November 8, 2005 / Notices
cash repurchase offer (‘‘Cash
Repurchase Offer,’’ and together with
the Exchange Tender Offer, the
‘‘Offers’’), which would constitute the
semi-annual cash repurchase offer
currently required by rule 23c–3 and
SSF III’s fundamental policies, as well
as by the Partnership Agreement. The
Cash Repurchase Offer would enable all
Unit holders to tender their Units to SSF
III in exchange for a cash payment equal
to the NAV of the Units on the
Valuation Date. The Cash Repurchase
Offer would not be limited by the
Exchange Tender Offer. The Cash
Repurchase Offer would be for 10% of
SSF III’s outstanding Units. If Limited
Partners tender for repurchase in the
Cash Repurchase Offer more than 10%
of the outstanding Units, the Board
would exercise its discretion to increase
the Cash Repurchase Offer by 2% (for a
total of 12% of Units outstanding). If
Limited Partners tender more than 12%
of the outstanding Units in the Cash
Repurchase Offer, SSF III will
repurchase Units tendered on a pro rata
basis.10 The Individual General
Partners, Adviser and Principals will
not participate in the Cash Repurchase
Offer. Applicants believe that any nonQualified Purchaser Unit Holder who
tenders Units in the Cash Repurchase
Offer will be able to receive cash for all
Units tendered. The Adviser and two of
its Principals, Austin Marxe and David
Greenhouse (in their individual
capacities), will participate in the
Exchange Tender Offer in the same
proportion as the Limited Partners after
giving effect to the Cash Repurchase
Offer, that is, they will exchange Units
in the same proportion as the Units held
by all Limited Partners (other than Mr.
Greenhouse) are exchanged, subject to
the Adviser and the Individual General
Partners holding collectively at least 1%
of SSF III’s outstanding Units. Making
the Transaction Participation
Assumptions, following the
Transaction, the Adviser and the
Principals collectively would own
approximately 7.7% of SSF III’s
outstanding Units.
7. Applicants propose for the Offers to
begin on November 17, 2005, and expire
10 In the semi-annual repurchase offers made by
SSF III over the last five years, which have typically
been for 10% of outstanding Units, Limited Partners
have never tendered for repurchase more than
4.13% of outstanding Units. In connection with SSF
III’s most recent cash repurchase offer, after having
received notice from SSF III of the expiration of the
Grandfather Clause and the effect thereof on the
operations of SSF III, SSF III Unit holders tendered
less than 2% of outstanding Units for repurchase.
Requests for repurchase have exceeded 5% of
outstanding Units on a semi-annual basis and 10%
of outstanding Units on an annual basis three times,
in all cases resulting from significant tenders by the
Adviser.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:11 Nov 07, 2005
Jkt 208001
on December 16, 2005. For purposes of
both Offers, the NAV of SSF III’s Units
would be determined on the Valuation
Date. Applicants intend to complete the
Transaction on December 31, 2005, and
to distribute proceeds of the Cash
Repurchase Offer by January 6, 2006.
Any and all costs and expenses incurred
by SSF III in connection with the Cash
Repurchase Offer will be incurred
before SSF III calculates its NAV, and
therefore will be reflected in the NAV,
on the Valuation Date. All expenses
associated with the Transaction will be
paid by the Adviser or SSF QP. No
repurchase fees, brokerage commissions,
fees or other remuneration will be paid
by SSF III, SSF QP or any Unit holder
in connection with the Transaction. The
Transaction will not be consummated
until the Commission has issued an
order relating to the application.
Applicants have agreed not to make any
material changes to the Transaction
without prior approval of the
Commission or its staff.
8. On May 2, 2005, the Board,
including a majority of the Individual
General Partners who are not
‘‘interested persons,’’ as defined in
section 2(a)(19) of the Act
(‘‘Independent General Partners’’),
approved the Transaction on behalf of
SSF III, subject to the Commission
issuing an order pursuant to the
application. Prior to approving the
Transaction, the Board considered other
alternatives. Specifically, the Board
considered converting SSF III into a
‘‘regulated investment company’’ under
the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as
amended, but rejected the alternative as
inconsistent with its operations,
including its treatment of operating
losses and net capital losses. The Board
also considered liquidating SSF III, but
rejected the alternative in light of,
among other things, the likelihood of
liquidation causing Limited Partners to
recognize taxable gain. In approving the
Transaction, the Board concluded that:
(a) The Transaction is consistent with
the policies of SSF III, as recited in its
registration statement, (b) the terms of
the Transaction, including the
consideration to be received by the
Funds, are reasonable and fair and do
not involve overreaching on the part of
any person concerned, and (c)
participation in the Transaction is in the
best interests of SSF III and its Limited
Partners, and the interests of existing
Limited Partners of SSF III will not be
diluted as a result of the Transaction.
Applicants state that the Board, in
reaching its conclusions, considered
that SSF III is likely to be significantly
smaller after the Transaction and that
PO 00000
Frm 00107
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
there may, as a result, be a material
increase in SSF III’s expense ratio. The
Applicants estimate, making the
Transaction Participation Assumptions
and assuming the transactions were
consummated on December 31, 2003,
that the fees and expenses of SSF III
(excluding any incentive allocation to
the Adviser but including all other fees)
for the calendar year ended December
31, 2004 would have been 1.57% of
average net assets, rather than 0.84% of
average net assets. Although this
relative increase in SSF III’s expense
ratio of 0.73% may be material, the
Applicants state that the Board believes
that the benefits of the Transaction to all
Partners (including the continued
service of the Adviser) outweigh the
burden of any such increase in SSF III’s
expense ratio.
Applicants’ Legal Analysis
1. Section 17(a) of the Act prohibits
any affiliated person of a registered
investment company, or any affiliated
person of that person (‘‘second tier
affiliate’’), acting as principal, from
selling to or purchasing from the
registered investment company any
security or other property. Section
2(a)(3) of the Act defines an ‘‘affiliated
person’’ as, among other things, any
person directly or indirectly owning,
controlling or holding with power to
vote 5% or more of the outstanding
voting securities of the other person;
any person controlling, controlled by or
under common control with the other
person; any officer, director, partner,
copartner or employee of the other
person; and, if the other person is an
investment company, its investment
adviser. Section 2(a)(9) of the Act
defines control to mean the power to
exercise a controlling influence over the
management or policies of a company.
Applicants state that the Adviser and
Principals may each be deemed to be an
affiliated person of SSF III and SSF QP,
and that SSF III and SSF QP may be
deemed to be affiliated persons of each
other as both are under common control
of the Adviser and the Principals.
Applicants also state that to the extent
that an Exchanging Holder owns 5% or
more of the outstanding Units of SSF III,
the Exchanging Holder could be deemed
to be an affiliated person of SSF III
(such Exchanging Holder, a ‘‘5%
Affiliate’’), and a second tier affiliate of
SSF QP. Thus, applicants state, section
17(a) of the Act may prohibit the
Adviser, Principals and 5% Affiliates
from purchasing Units of SSF QP from
SSF III, and prohibit SSF QP from
purchasing portfolio securities of SSF III
in exchange for SSF QP Units.
E:\FR\FM\08NON1.SGM
08NON1
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 215 / Tuesday, November 8, 2005 / Notices
2. Section 17(b) of the Act authorizes
the Commission to exempt a transaction
from the provisions of section 17(a) if
the terms of the transaction, including
the consideration to be paid or received,
are reasonable and fair and do not
involve overreaching on the part of any
person concerned and the proposed
transaction is consistent with the
policies of each registered investment
company concerned and with the
general purposes of the Act. Applicants
submit that the Transaction has been
approved by the Board, including a
majority of the Independent General
Partners, is reasonable and fair to SSF
III and its Unit holders and meets the
requirements of section 17(b) of the Act.
Applicants state that the Transaction
will not result in dilution to Unit
holders of SSF III because (a) it will be
effected at the NAV of SSF III’s Units,
which NAV will be calculated in
accordance with SSF III’s policies and
procedures, as set forth in its
registration statement, and computed
using the same methodologies that SSF
III has used to calculate its NAV in
connection with each routine
repurchase offer since its inception,11
and (b) it will involve a pro rata transfer
of SSF III’s portfolio securities to SSF
QP. Applicants further state that, prior
to the Transaction, any Limited Partner
not wishing to remain invested in SSF
III or become invested in SSF QP will
be able to have his or her Units
repurchased for cash at the NAV of the
Units, and all expenses of the
Transaction will be paid by the Adviser
or SSF QP, including the cost of
separating SSF III’s portfolio between
SSF III and SSF QP in the Transaction.
Applicants’ Conditions
Applicants agree that any order
granting the requested relief will be
subject to the following conditions:
1. The Exchange Tender Offer will be
effected at the NAV of SSF III’s Units
determined in accordance with its
registration statement under the Act.
2. The sale of portfolio securities by
SSF III to SSF QP in the Transaction
will comply with the terms of rule 17a–
7(c), (d) and (f) under the Act.
3. At its next regular meeting
following the Transaction, the Board of
SSF III, including a majority of the
Independent General Partners, will
determine whether the Units were
valued in accordance with condition 1
above.
4. SSF III will maintain and preserve
for a period of not less than six years
11 SSF QP has the same policies and procedures,
and will employ the same methodologies to
compute its NAV, as SSF III.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:11 Nov 07, 2005
Jkt 208001
from the end of the fiscal year in which
the Transaction occurs, the first two
years in an easily accessible place, a
written record of the Transaction setting
forth a description of each security
transferred, the terms of the
Transaction, and the information or
materials upon which the determination
required by condition 3 was made.
5. In the Transaction, the portfolio
securities will be distributed by SSF III
to SSF QP on a pro rata basis, except
that cash may be distributed in lieu of
fractional shares.
For the Commission, by the Division of
Investment Management, under delegated
authority.
Jonathan G. Katz,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 05–22163 Filed 11–7–05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8010–01–P
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
COMMISSION
Sunshine Act Meeting
Notice is hereby given, pursuant to
the provisions of the Government in the
Sunshine Act, Pub. L. 94–409, that the
Securities and Exchange Commission
will hold the following meeting during
the week of November 7, 2005:
A Closed Meeting will be held on
Thursday, November 10, 2005 at 10 a.m.
Commissioners, Counsel to the
Commissioners, the Secretary to the
Commission, and recording secretaries
will attend the Closed Meeting. Certain
staff members who have an interest in
the matters may also be present.
The General Counsel of the
Commission, or his designee, has
certified that, in his opinion, one or
more of the exemptions set forth in 5
U.S.C. 552b(c)(5), (6), (7), (9)(B), and
(10) and 17 CFR 200.402(a)(5), (6), (7),
9(ii) and (10) permit consideration of
the scheduled matters at the Closed
Meeting.
Commissioner Glassman, as duty
officer, voted to consider the items
listed for the closed meeting in closed
session.
The subject matter of the Closed
Meeting scheduled for Thursday,
November 10, 2005 will be:
Formal orders of investigations;
Institution and settlement of
injunctive actions;
Institution and settlement of
administrative proceedings of an
enforcement nature;
Opinion; and a
Regulatory matter bearing
enforcement implications.
At times, changes in Commission
priorities require alterations in the
scheduling of meeting items.
PO 00000
Frm 00108
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
67765
For further information and to
ascertain what, if any, matters have been
added, deleted or postponed, please
contact: The Office of the Secretary at
(202) 551–5400.
Dated: November 3, 2005.
Jonathan G. Katz,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 05–22292 Filed 11–3–05; 4:11 pm]
BILLING CODE 8010–01–P
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
COMMISSION
[Release No. 34–52718; File No. SR–Amex–
2005–060]
Self-Regulatory Organizations;
American Stock Exchange LLC; Notice
of Filing of Proposed Rule Change and
Amendments Nos. 1, 2, and 3 Thereto
Relating to Amendments to the
Obvious Error Rules
November 2, 2005.
Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(‘‘Act’’),1 and Rule 19b–4 thereunder,2
notice is hereby given that on May 31,
2005, the American Stock Exchange LLC
(‘‘Amex’’ or ‘‘Exchange’’) filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission
(‘‘Commission’’) the proposed rule
change as described in Items I, II, and
III below, which Items have been
prepared by the Exchange. On
September 21, 2005, the Amex
submitted Amendment No. 1 to the
proposed rule change.3 On October 4,
2005, the Amex submitted Amendment
No. 2 to the proposed rule change.4 On
October 27, 2005, the Amex submitted
Amendment No. 3 to the proposed rule
change.5 The Commission is publishing
this notice to solicit comments on the
proposed rule change from interested
persons.
I. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Terms of Substance of
the Proposed Rule Change
The Amex proposes to: (i) Amend the
equity and index options obvious error
rules to revise the manner in which an
obvious price error is determined for
both equity and index options; (ii)
1 15
U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
CFR 240.19b–4.
3 See Form 19b–4 dated September 21, 2005,
which replaced the original filing in its entirety
(‘‘Amendment No. 1’’).
4 Amendment No. 2 corrected technical errors in
the proposed rule text.
5 Amendment No. 3 incorporated certain
proposed revisions to Amex Rules 936 and 936—
ANTE contained in Amendment No. 1 to Amex
Rules 936C and 936C—ANTE and corrected an
error in the proposed rule text of Amex Rules 936C
and 936C—ANTE.
2 17
E:\FR\FM\08NON1.SGM
08NON1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 215 (Tuesday, November 8, 2005)]
[Notices]
[Pages 67762-67765]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-22163]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
[Investment Company Act Release No. 27140; 812-13190]
Special Situations Fund III, L.P., et al., Notice of Application
November 2, 2005.
AGENCY: Securities and Exchange Commission (``Commission'').
ACTION: Notice of application for an order under section 17(b) of the
Investment Company Act of 1940 (the ``Act'') for an exemption from
section 17(a) of the Act.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Applicants: Special Situations Fund III, L.P. (``SSF III''),
Special Situations Fund III QP, L.P. (``SSF QP,'' and together with SSF
III, the ``Funds'') and MGP Advisers Limited Partnership (``Adviser'').
Summary of Application: Applicants request an order to permit
certain purchase and sale transactions in connection with a proposed
division of a registered closed-end management investment company into
two separate companies (the ``Transaction'').
Filing Dates: The application was filed on May 19, 2005, and
amended on November 2, 2005.
Hearing or Notification of Hearing: An order granting the
application will be issued unless the Commission orders a hearing.
Interested persons may request a hearing by writing to the Commission's
Secretary and serving applicants with a copy of the request, personally
or by mail. Hearing requests should be received by the Commission by
5:30 p.m. on November 25, 2005, and should be accompanied by proof of
service on the applicants, in the form of an affidavit or, for lawyers,
a certificate of service. Hearing requests should state the nature of
the writer's interest, the reason for the request, and the issues
contested. Persons may request notification of a hearing by writing to
the Commission's Secretary.
ADDRESSES: Secretary, U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission, 100 F
Street, NE., Washington, DC 20549-0609. Applicants, c/o Austin W.
Marxe, MGP Advisers Limited Partnership, 153 East 53rd Street, 55th
Floor, New York, NY 10022.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Bruce R. MacNeil, Senior Counsel (202-
551-6817), or Stacy L. Fuller, Branch Chief (202-551-6821) (Office of
Investment Company Regulation, Division of Investment Management).
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The following is a summary of the
application. The complete application may be obtained for a fee from
the Commission's Public Reference Branch, 100 F Street, NE.,
Washington, DC 20549-0102 (202-551-5850).
Applicants' Representations
1. SSF III, a Delaware limited partnership, is a closed-end
management investment company that is registered under the Act and
operates as an ``interval fund'' under rule 23e-3 under the Act.
Partnership interests (``Units'') in SSF III are not registered under
the Securities Act of 1933 (``1933 Act'') and are sold in private
offerings pursuant to Regulation D under the 1933 Act generally to
``accredited investors,'' as defined in Regulation D. Each investor in
SSF III that pays the Adviser an incentive allocation is also a
``qualified client,'' as defined in rule 205-3 under the Investment
Advisers Act of 1940, as amended (``Advisers
[[Page 67763]]
Act''). Under SSF III's fundamental policies and rule 23c-3, as well as
its partnership agreement (the ``Partnership Agreement''), SSF III
conducts semi-annual repurchase offers for between 10% and 25% of
outstanding Units, as determined by the individual general partners of
SSF III (each, an ``Individual General Partner,'' collectively, the
``Board,'' and the Board together with the Adviser, the ``General
Partners''), who are responsible for the overall management and
supervision of SSF III. SSF III may also sell Units to existing Unit
holders with a limited partnership interest (``Limited Partners,'' and
together with the General Partners, ``Partners'') and other investors
in the future. SSF III's investment objectives are to maximize long-
term capital appreciation by investing primarily in equity securities
and securities with equity features, which are traded on a national
securities exchange or Nasdaq. As of June 30, 2005, SSF III had
approximately 451 Unit holders (92% of whom were qualified purchasers,
as defined in section 2(a)(51) of the Act (``Qualified Purchasers,''
and such Unit holders, ``Qualified Purchaser Unit Holders'')) and
approximately $500 million in assets. SSF III's fees and expenses for
the year ended December 31, 2004, as a percentage of average net
assets, totaled 5.41% (including the Adviser's incentive allocation of
20% of net profits).\1\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ Excluding the Adviser's incentive allocation, SSF III's fees
totaled approximately .84% of average net assets. The Adviser's
incentive allocation is subject to a high water mark.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
2. SSF QP, a Delaware limited partnership that was formed on May
17, 2005 to effect the Transaction is excluded from regulation under
the Act pursuant to section 3(c)(7) of the Act.\2\ SSF QP has the same
investment objectives as SSF III. SSF QP will have no assets until
after the consummation of the Transaction. SSF QP will have the same
administration fee and incentive allocation structure as SSF III.
Applicants estimate that the fees and expenses for SSF QP (excluding
any incentive allocation to the Adviser but including all other fees)
would have been on a pro forma basis approximately 0.81% of average net
assets for the calendar year ended December 31, 2004.\3\ Beginning June
30, 2006, limited partners of SSF QP may redeem their Units of SSF QP
semi-annually on June 30 and December 31 of each calendar year, by
providing written notice to the Adviser on or before June 15 or
December 15, respectively, of such calendar year. The Adviser has the
right to limit the aggregate redemptions of Units of SSF QP by limited
partners in any semi-annual fiscal period to 10% of the outstanding
Units at the last day of the period (after the redetermination of Units
to reflect SSF QP's profit or loss as of the end of such period).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\2\ SSF QP has been formed in compliance with, and will be bound
by the terms and conditions of, the application.
\3\ For purposes of projecting the effects of the Transaction,
the Applicants have assumed the Cash Repurchase Offer and the
Exchange Tender Offer (each as defined below) were consummated as
follows (collectively, the ``Transaction Participation
Assumptions''): (a) All Qualified Purchaser Unit Holders other than
the Adviser and the Principals (as defined below) fully participated
in the Exchange Tender Offer; (b) approximately 4.2% of the
outstanding Units of SSF III (representing half of the Units of non-
Qualified Purchaser Unit Holders (as defined below)) participated in
the Cash Repurchase Offer; (c) the Adviser did not participate in
the Cash Repurchase Offer; (d) the Adviser, and two Principals,
Austin Marxe and David Greenhouse, participated in the Exchange
Tender Offer in the same proportion as other Limited Partners, as
further described below; and (e) Adam Stettner, a Principal, did not
participate in the Cash Repurchase Offer or the Exchange Tender
Offer. The net result of the Transaction Participation Assumptions
is that approximately 91.3% of SSF III's outstanding Units would be
exchanged for Units of SSF QP, approximately 4.5% would remain in
SSF III, and approximately 4.2% would be repurchased for cash. There
can be no assurance that participation in the Cash Repurchase Offer
and the Exchange Tender Offer will be similar to the Transaction
Participation Assumptions.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
3. The Adviser, a Delaware limited partnership, is registered as an
investment adviser under the Advisers Act. The Adviser is the
investment adviser to the Funds. The Adviser is also a General Partner
of SSF III and will be the general partner of SSF QP upon completion of
the Transaction. AWM Investment Company, Inc. (``AWM'') is the general
partner of the Adviser and Austin W. Marxe, David Greenhouse and Adam
Stettner are limited partners of the Adviser (each, including AWM, a
``Principal''). The Adviser and Mr. Marxe each own a general
partnership interest in SSF III totaling in the aggregate approximately
7% of outstanding Units. The other Principals each own a limited
partnership interest in SSF III totaling approximately less than 1% of
outstanding Units.
4. A provision in the applicable Treasury regulations,\4\ which has
allowed SSF III to operate as a registered investment company but not
be taxed as a publicly traded partnership for federal income tax
purposes (``Grandfather Clause''), will expire on December 31, 2005.\5\
Unless SSF III satisfies a safe harbor in the Treasury regulations, any
future determination of whether it would be taxed as a publicly traded
partnership would be made by applying a facts-and-circumstances test.
To continue to rely on a safe harbor and thereby avoid the uncertainty
of a facts-and-circumstances test, SSF III may amend its repurchase
policies to, among other things, reduce the repurchase offer amount on
a semi-annual and annual basis to, respectively, 5% and 10% of
outstanding Units.\6\ Amending the repurchase policies as applicants
intend to do to qualify for the safe harbor is not satisfactory to the
largest Limited Partners, all of whom are Qualified Purchasers, because
of the resulting decrease in the liquidity of their Units.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\4\ 26 CFR 1.7704-1.
\5\ A publicly traded partnership is generally taxed as a
corporation, i.e. subject to a double level of taxation.
\6\ Changes to SSF III's repurchase policies will be subject to
the approval of a majority of the outstanding Units held by Limited
Partners after completion of the Offers, as defined below.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
5. Applicants propose to conduct the Transaction to divide SSF III
into two separate companies to accommodate the needs of the Qualified
Purchaser Unit Holders and those Unit holders that are not Qualified
Purchasers (``non-Qualified Purchaser Unit Holders'').\7\ Pursuant to
the Transaction, SSF III would conduct an exchange offer for the Units
of Qualified Purchaser Unit Holders in which they may tender their
Units of SSF III and receive, in exchange, Units of SSF QP (``Exchange
Tender Offer''). The Exchange Tender Offer will not be a taxable
transaction for the Funds. In the Transaction, (a) SSF III would accept
from Qualified Purchaser Unit Holders who elect to participate in the
Exchange Tender Offer (``Exchanging Holders'') Units of SSF III, (b)
SSF III would transfer to SSF QP, on a strict pro rata basis, portfolio
securities having a total net asset value (``NAV'') equal to the total
NAV of the SSF III Units, as calculated on December 30, 2005 (the
``Valuation Date''), tendered in the Exchange Tender Offer, (c) SSF III
would receive Units of SSF QP having a total NAV equal to both the
total NAV of the SSF III Units tendered by Exchanging Holders and the
total NAV of the portfolio securities transferred from SSF III to SSF
QP,\8\ and (d) SSF III would distribute the SSF QP Units to Exchanging
Holders on a pro rata basis.\9\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\7\ The Transaction is subject to the approval of a majority of
the outstanding Units held by Limited Partners.
\8\ SSF III is a Qualified Purchaser.
\9\ Limited Partners and General Partners that tender in the
Exchange Tender Offer will receive, respectively, limited and
general partnership Units of SSF QP. The Adviser and two Principals
will participate in the Exchange Tender Offer, tendering the same
percentage of the Units they hold as all other Limited Partners
tender of the Units they hold.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
6. Simultaneous with the Exchange Tender Offer, SSF III would
conduct a
[[Page 67764]]
cash repurchase offer (``Cash Repurchase Offer,'' and together with the
Exchange Tender Offer, the ``Offers''), which would constitute the
semi-annual cash repurchase offer currently required by rule 23c-3 and
SSF III's fundamental policies, as well as by the Partnership
Agreement. The Cash Repurchase Offer would enable all Unit holders to
tender their Units to SSF III in exchange for a cash payment equal to
the NAV of the Units on the Valuation Date. The Cash Repurchase Offer
would not be limited by the Exchange Tender Offer. The Cash Repurchase
Offer would be for 10% of SSF III's outstanding Units. If Limited
Partners tender for repurchase in the Cash Repurchase Offer more than
10% of the outstanding Units, the Board would exercise its discretion
to increase the Cash Repurchase Offer by 2% (for a total of 12% of
Units outstanding). If Limited Partners tender more than 12% of the
outstanding Units in the Cash Repurchase Offer, SSF III will repurchase
Units tendered on a pro rata basis.\10\ The Individual General
Partners, Adviser and Principals will not participate in the Cash
Repurchase Offer. Applicants believe that any non-Qualified Purchaser
Unit Holder who tenders Units in the Cash Repurchase Offer will be able
to receive cash for all Units tendered. The Adviser and two of its
Principals, Austin Marxe and David Greenhouse (in their individual
capacities), will participate in the Exchange Tender Offer in the same
proportion as the Limited Partners after giving effect to the Cash
Repurchase Offer, that is, they will exchange Units in the same
proportion as the Units held by all Limited Partners (other than Mr.
Greenhouse) are exchanged, subject to the Adviser and the Individual
General Partners holding collectively at least 1% of SSF III's
outstanding Units. Making the Transaction Participation Assumptions,
following the Transaction, the Adviser and the Principals collectively
would own approximately 7.7% of SSF III's outstanding Units.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\10\ In the semi-annual repurchase offers made by SSF III over
the last five years, which have typically been for 10% of
outstanding Units, Limited Partners have never tendered for
repurchase more than 4.13% of outstanding Units. In connection with
SSF III's most recent cash repurchase offer, after having received
notice from SSF III of the expiration of the Grandfather Clause and
the effect thereof on the operations of SSF III, SSF III Unit
holders tendered less than 2% of outstanding Units for repurchase.
Requests for repurchase have exceeded 5% of outstanding Units on a
semi-annual basis and 10% of outstanding Units on an annual basis
three times, in all cases resulting from significant tenders by the
Adviser.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
7. Applicants propose for the Offers to begin on November 17, 2005,
and expire on December 16, 2005. For purposes of both Offers, the NAV
of SSF III's Units would be determined on the Valuation Date.
Applicants intend to complete the Transaction on December 31, 2005, and
to distribute proceeds of the Cash Repurchase Offer by January 6, 2006.
Any and all costs and expenses incurred by SSF III in connection with
the Cash Repurchase Offer will be incurred before SSF III calculates
its NAV, and therefore will be reflected in the NAV, on the Valuation
Date. All expenses associated with the Transaction will be paid by the
Adviser or SSF QP. No repurchase fees, brokerage commissions, fees or
other remuneration will be paid by SSF III, SSF QP or any Unit holder
in connection with the Transaction. The Transaction will not be
consummated until the Commission has issued an order relating to the
application. Applicants have agreed not to make any material changes to
the Transaction without prior approval of the Commission or its staff.
8. On May 2, 2005, the Board, including a majority of the
Individual General Partners who are not ``interested persons,'' as
defined in section 2(a)(19) of the Act (``Independent General
Partners''), approved the Transaction on behalf of SSF III, subject to
the Commission issuing an order pursuant to the application. Prior to
approving the Transaction, the Board considered other alternatives.
Specifically, the Board considered converting SSF III into a
``regulated investment company'' under the Internal Revenue Code of
1986, as amended, but rejected the alternative as inconsistent with its
operations, including its treatment of operating losses and net capital
losses. The Board also considered liquidating SSF III, but rejected the
alternative in light of, among other things, the likelihood of
liquidation causing Limited Partners to recognize taxable gain. In
approving the Transaction, the Board concluded that: (a) The
Transaction is consistent with the policies of SSF III, as recited in
its registration statement, (b) the terms of the Transaction, including
the consideration to be received by the Funds, are reasonable and fair
and do not involve overreaching on the part of any person concerned,
and (c) participation in the Transaction is in the best interests of
SSF III and its Limited Partners, and the interests of existing Limited
Partners of SSF III will not be diluted as a result of the Transaction.
Applicants state that the Board, in reaching its conclusions,
considered that SSF III is likely to be significantly smaller after the
Transaction and that there may, as a result, be a material increase in
SSF III's expense ratio. The Applicants estimate, making the
Transaction Participation Assumptions and assuming the transactions
were consummated on December 31, 2003, that the fees and expenses of
SSF III (excluding any incentive allocation to the Adviser but
including all other fees) for the calendar year ended December 31, 2004
would have been 1.57% of average net assets, rather than 0.84% of
average net assets. Although this relative increase in SSF III's
expense ratio of 0.73% may be material, the Applicants state that the
Board believes that the benefits of the Transaction to all Partners
(including the continued service of the Adviser) outweigh the burden of
any such increase in SSF III's expense ratio.
Applicants' Legal Analysis
1. Section 17(a) of the Act prohibits any affiliated person of a
registered investment company, or any affiliated person of that person
(``second tier affiliate''), acting as principal, from selling to or
purchasing from the registered investment company any security or other
property. Section 2(a)(3) of the Act defines an ``affiliated person''
as, among other things, any person directly or indirectly owning,
controlling or holding with power to vote 5% or more of the outstanding
voting securities of the other person; any person controlling,
controlled by or under common control with the other person; any
officer, director, partner, copartner or employee of the other person;
and, if the other person is an investment company, its investment
adviser. Section 2(a)(9) of the Act defines control to mean the power
to exercise a controlling influence over the management or policies of
a company. Applicants state that the Adviser and Principals may each be
deemed to be an affiliated person of SSF III and SSF QP, and that SSF
III and SSF QP may be deemed to be affiliated persons of each other as
both are under common control of the Adviser and the Principals.
Applicants also state that to the extent that an Exchanging Holder owns
5% or more of the outstanding Units of SSF III, the Exchanging Holder
could be deemed to be an affiliated person of SSF III (such Exchanging
Holder, a ``5% Affiliate''), and a second tier affiliate of SSF QP.
Thus, applicants state, section 17(a) of the Act may prohibit the
Adviser, Principals and 5% Affiliates from purchasing Units of SSF QP
from SSF III, and prohibit SSF QP from purchasing portfolio securities
of SSF III in exchange for SSF QP Units.
[[Page 67765]]
2. Section 17(b) of the Act authorizes the Commission to exempt a
transaction from the provisions of section 17(a) if the terms of the
transaction, including the consideration to be paid or received, are
reasonable and fair and do not involve overreaching on the part of any
person concerned and the proposed transaction is consistent with the
policies of each registered investment company concerned and with the
general purposes of the Act. Applicants submit that the Transaction has
been approved by the Board, including a majority of the Independent
General Partners, is reasonable and fair to SSF III and its Unit
holders and meets the requirements of section 17(b) of the Act.
Applicants state that the Transaction will not result in dilution to
Unit holders of SSF III because (a) it will be effected at the NAV of
SSF III's Units, which NAV will be calculated in accordance with SSF
III's policies and procedures, as set forth in its registration
statement, and computed using the same methodologies that SSF III has
used to calculate its NAV in connection with each routine repurchase
offer since its inception,\11\ and (b) it will involve a pro rata
transfer of SSF III's portfolio securities to SSF QP. Applicants
further state that, prior to the Transaction, any Limited Partner not
wishing to remain invested in SSF III or become invested in SSF QP will
be able to have his or her Units repurchased for cash at the NAV of the
Units, and all expenses of the Transaction will be paid by the Adviser
or SSF QP, including the cost of separating SSF III's portfolio between
SSF III and SSF QP in the Transaction.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\11\ SSF QP has the same policies and procedures, and will
employ the same methodologies to compute its NAV, as SSF III.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Applicants' Conditions
Applicants agree that any order granting the requested relief will
be subject to the following conditions:
1. The Exchange Tender Offer will be effected at the NAV of SSF
III's Units determined in accordance with its registration statement
under the Act.
2. The sale of portfolio securities by SSF III to SSF QP in the
Transaction will comply with the terms of rule 17a-7(c), (d) and (f)
under the Act.
3. At its next regular meeting following the Transaction, the Board
of SSF III, including a majority of the Independent General Partners,
will determine whether the Units were valued in accordance with
condition 1 above.
4. SSF III will maintain and preserve for a period of not less than
six years from the end of the fiscal year in which the Transaction
occurs, the first two years in an easily accessible place, a written
record of the Transaction setting forth a description of each security
transferred, the terms of the Transaction, and the information or
materials upon which the determination required by condition 3 was
made.
5. In the Transaction, the portfolio securities will be distributed
by SSF III to SSF QP on a pro rata basis, except that cash may be
distributed in lieu of fractional shares.
For the Commission, by the Division of Investment Management,
under delegated authority.
Jonathan G. Katz,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 05-22163 Filed 11-7-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8010-01-P