Paper Clips from the People's Republic of China; Notice of Final Results of Expedited Sunset Review of Antidumping Duty Order, 67433-67434 [05-22144]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 214 / Monday, November 7, 2005 / Notices
to continuation or recurrence of
dumping at the levels listed in the
‘‘Final Results of Reviews’’ section
below.
EFFECTIVE DATE:
November 7, 2005.
Zev
Primor or Edythe Artman, AD/CVD
Enforcement 5, Import Administration,
International Trade Administration,
U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th
Street & Constitution Avenue, NW,
Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202)
482–4114 or (202) 482–3931.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Background:
On July 1, 2005, the Department
initiated the second sunset reviews of
the antidumping duty orders on light–
walled welded rectangular carbon steel
tubing from Argentina and Taiwan
pursuant to section 751(c) of the Act.
See Initiation of Five-year (‘‘Sunset’’)
Reviews, 70 FR 38101 (July 1, 2005).
The Department received a notice of
intent to participate from Allied Tube
and Conduit, Hannibal Industries,
Leavitt Tube Company, Northwest Pipe
Company, Searing Industries, and
Western Tube and Conduit (collectively
the domestic interested parties) within
the deadline specified in 19 CFR
351.218(d)(1)(i) pertaining to sunset
reviews. The domestic interested parties
claimed interested–party status under
section 771(9)(C) of the Act as
manufacturers of a domestic like
product in the United States. We
received complete substantive responses
from the domestic interested parties
within the 30-day deadline specified in
19 CFR 351.218(d)(3)(i). We received no
responses from the respondent
interested parties. As a result, pursuant
to section 751(c)(3)(B) of the Act and 19
CFR 351.218(e)(1)(ii)(C)(2), the
Department has conducted expedited
(120-day) sunset reviews of these orders.
Scope of the Orders:
The product covered by these orders
is light–walled welded carbon steel
pipes and tubes of rectangular
(including square) cross-section having
a wall thickness of less than 0.156 inch.
This merchandise is classified under
item number 7306.60.50.00 of the
Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the
United States. It was formerly classified
under item number 610.4928 of the
Tariff Schedules of the United States.
Analysis of Comments Received:
All issues raised in these reviews are
addressed in the Issues and Decision
Memorandum from Stephen J. Claeys,
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Import
Administration, to Joseph A. Spetrini,
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:38 Nov 04, 2005
Jkt 208001
Acting Assistant Secretary for Import
Administration, dated October 31, 2005,
which is hereby adopted by this notice.
The issues discussed in the Issues and
Decision Memorandum include the
likelihood of continuation or recurrence
of dumping and the magnitude of the
margins likely to prevail if the orders
were to be revoked. Parties can find a
complete discussion of all issues raised
in these reviews and the corresponding
recommendations in this public
memorandum which is on file in room
B–099 of the main Commerce building.
In addition, a complete version of the
Issues and Decision Memorandum can
be accessed directly on the Web at
https://ia.ita.doc.gov/frn. The paper copy
and electronic version of the Issues and
Decision Memorandum are identical in
content.
67433
Dated: October 31, 2005.
Joseph A. Spetrini,
Acting Assistant Secretary for Import
Administration.
[FR Doc. 05–22152 Filed 11–4–05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–DS–S
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
Paper Clips from the People’s Republic
of China; Notice of Final Results of
Expedited Sunset Review of
Antidumping Duty Order
A–570–826
Import Administration,
International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
SUMMARY: On July 1, 2005, the
Department of Commerce (‘‘the
Department’’) initiated the sunset
Final Results of Reviews:
review of the antidumping duty order
on paper clips from the People’s
We determine that revocation of the
Republic of China (‘‘China’’). See
antidumping duty orders on light–
Initiation of Five-year (‘‘Sunset’’)
walled welded rectangular carbon steel
Reviews, 70 FR 38101 (July 1, 2005). On
tubing from Argentina and Taiwan
the basis of Notices of Intent to
would be likely to lead to continuation
Participate, adequate substantive
or recurrence of dumping at the
responses filed on behalf of domestic
following weighted–average percentage
interested parties, and a lack of response
margins:
from respondent interested parties, the
Department conducted an expedited
Weighted– (120-day) sunset review. As a result of
Manufacturers/Exporters/ProAverage
this sunset review, the Department finds
ducers
Margin
that revocation of the antidumping duty
(percent)
order would likely lead to the
Argentina.
continuation or recurrence of dumping.
All Manufacturers/Producers/ExThe dumping margins are identified in
porters .....................................
56.26 the Final Results of Review section of
Taiwan.
this notice.
Ornatube Enterprise ...................
5.51 EFFECTIVE DATE: November 7, 2005.
Vulcan Industrial Corp. ...............
40.97
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Yieh Hsing Industries, Ltd. .........
40.97
Hilary Sadler, Esq. or Maureen
All Other Manufacturers/ProFlannery, AD/CVD Operations,
ducers/Exporters .....................
29.15
International Trade Administration,
U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th
This notice also serves as the only
Street & Constitution Avenue, NW,
reminder to parties subject to
Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202)
administrative protective orders (APO)
482–4340 or (202) 482–3020,
of their responsibility concerning the
respectively.
return or destruction of proprietary
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
information disclosed under APO in
Background
accordance with 19 CFR 351.305.
Timely notification of the return or
On July 1, 2005, the Department
destruction of APO materials or
published the notice of initiation of the
conversion to judicial protective orders
sunset review of the antidumping duty
order on paper clips from China
is hereby requested. Failure to comply
pursuant to section 751(c) of the Tariff
with the regulations and terms of an
Act of 1930, as amended (‘‘the Act’’).
APO is a violation which is subject to
See Initiation of Five-year (‘‘Sunset’’)
sanction.
Reviews, 70 FR 38101 (July 1, 2005). On
We are issuing and publishing these
July 11, 2005 and July 16, 2005, the
results and notice in accordance with
Department received a Notice of Intent
sections 751(c), 752, and 777(i)(1) of the
to Participate from Officemate
Act.
International Corporation and ACCO
PO 00000
AGENCY:
Brands, Inc., the domestic interested
Frm 00024
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
E:\FR\FM\07NON1.SGM
07NON1
67434
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 214 / Monday, November 7, 2005 / Notices
parties, within the deadline specified in
section 351.218(d)(1)(i) of the
Department’s regulations. The domestic
interested parties claimed interested
parties status under section 771(9)(C) of
the Act, as manufacturers, producers, or
wholesalers in the United States of a
domestic like product. On July 29, 2005,
and August 1, 2005, the Department
received complete substantive responses
from the domestic interested parties
within the deadline specified in section
351.218(d)(3)(i) of the Department’s
regulations. The Department did not
receive a response from any respondent
interested parties to this proceeding. As
a result, pursuant to section 751(c)(3)(B)
of the Act and section
351.218(e)(1)(ii)(C)(2) of the
Department’s regulations, the
Department conducted an expedited
review of this order.
Scope of the Order
The products covered by this order
are certain paper clips, wholly of wire
of base metal, whether or not
galvanized, whether or not plated with
nickel or other base metal (e.g., copper),
with a wire diameter between 0.025
inches and 0.075 inches (0.64 to 1.91
millimeters), regardless of physical
configuration, except as specifically
excluded. The products subject to this
order may have a rectangular or ring–
like shape and include, but are not
limited to, clips commercially referred
to as No. 1 clips, No. 3 clips, Jumbo or
Giant clips, Gem clips, Frictioned clips,
Perfect Gems, Marcel Gems, Universal
clips, Nifty clips, Peerless clips, Ring
clips, and Glide–On clips. The products
subject to this order are currently
classifiable under subheading
8305.90.3010 of the Harmonized Tariff
Schedule of the United States
(‘‘HTSUS’’).
Specifically excluded from the scope
of this order are plastic and vinyl
covered paper clips, butterfly clips,
binder clips, or other paper fasteners
that are not made wholly of wire of base
metal and are covered under a separate
subheading of the HTSUS.
Although the HTSUS subheadings are
provided for convenience and customs
purposes, the written description of the
scope of this order is dispositive.
Analysis of Comments Received
All issues raised in this review are
addressed in the ‘‘Issues and Decision
Memorandum’’ (‘‘Decision Memo’’)
from Stephen J. Claeys, Deputy
Assistant Secretary for AD/CVD
Operations, to Joseph A. Spetrini,
Acting Assistant Secretary for Import
Administration, dated October 31, 2005,
which is hereby adopted by this notice.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:38 Nov 04, 2005
Jkt 208001
The issues discussed in the Decision
Memo include the likelihood of
continuation or recurrence of dumping
and the magnitude of the margins likely
to prevail if the order were revoked.
Parties can find a complete discussion
of all issues raised in this review and
the corresponding recommendations in
this public memorandum which is on
file in room B–099 of the main
Commerce building.
In addition, a complete version of the
Decision Memo can be accessed directly
on the Web at https://ia.ita.doc.gov/frn/.
The paper copy and electronic version
of the Decision Memo are identical in
content.
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
A–570–879
Polyvinyl Alcohol from the People’s
Republic of China: Preliminary Results
of Antidumping Duty Administrative
Review
Import Administration,
International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce
(‘‘the Department’’) is conducting the
first administrative review of the
antidumping duty order on polyvinyl
alcohol (‘‘PVA’’) from the People’s
Final Results of Review
Republic of China (‘‘PRC’’) covering the
period August 11, 2003, through
We determine that revocation of the
September 30, 2004. We have
antidumping duty order on paper clips
preliminarily determined that sales have
from China would be likely to lead to
been made below normal value. If these
continuation or recurrence of dumping
preliminary results are adopted in our
at the following weighted–average
final results of this review, we will
percentage margins:
instruct U.S. Customs and Border
Protection (‘‘CBP’’) to assess
Manufacturers/ExportWeighted Average
antidumping duties on entries of subject
ers/Producers
Margin (percent)
merchandise during the period of
review (‘‘POR’’) for which the importer–
Shanghai Lansheng
Corporation ...............
57.64 specific assessment rates are above de
minimis.
Zhejiang Light Industrial
Products Import & ExInterested parties are invited to
port Corporation ........
46.01 comment on these preliminary results.
Zhejiang Machinery and
We will issue the final results no later
Equipment Import &
than 120 days from the date of
Export Corporation ....
60.70
publication of this notice.
China–wide Rate ..........
126.94
EFFECTIVE DATE: November 7, 2005.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Lilit
This notice also serves as the only
Astvatsatrian, AD/CVD Operations,
reminder to parties subject to
administrative protective order (‘‘APO’’) Office 8, Import Administration,
International Trade Administration,
of their responsibility concerning the
U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th
return or destruction of proprietary
Street and Constitution Avenue, NW,
information disclosed under APO in
Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202)
accordance with section 351.305 of the
482–6412.
Department’s regulations. Timely
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
notification of the return or destruction
of APO materials or conversion to
Background
judicial protective order is hereby
On October 1, 2003, the Department
requested. Failure to comply with the
published in the Federal Register the
regulations and terms of an APO is a
antidumping duty order on PVA from
violation which is subject to sanction.
the PRC. See Antidumping Duty Order:
We are issuing and publishing these
Polyvinyl Alcohol from the People’s
results and notice in accordance with
Republic of China, 68 FR 56620
sections 751(c), 752, and 777(i)(1) of the (October 1, 2003). On October 1, 2004,
Act.
the Department published a notice of
opportunity to request an administrative
Dated: October 31, 2005.
review of the antidumping duty order
Joseph A. Spetrini,
on PVA from the PRC for the period
Acting Assistant Secretary for Import
March 20, 2003, through September 30,
Administration.
2004. See Antidumping or
[FR Doc. 05–22144 Filed 11–4–05; 8:45 am]
Countervailing Duty Order, Finding, or
BILLING CODE 3510–DS–S
Suspended Investigation: Opportunity
to Request Administrative Review, 69
FR 58889 (October 1, 2004). On October
PO 00000
Frm 00025
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
AGENCY:
E:\FR\FM\07NON1.SGM
07NON1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 214 (Monday, November 7, 2005)]
[Notices]
[Pages 67433-67434]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-22144]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
Paper Clips from the People's Republic of China; Notice of Final
Results of Expedited Sunset Review of Antidumping Duty Order
A-570-826
AGENCY: Import Administration, International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
SUMMARY: On July 1, 2005, the Department of Commerce (``the
Department'') initiated the sunset review of the antidumping duty order
on paper clips from the People's Republic of China (``China''). See
Initiation of Five-year (``Sunset'') Reviews, 70 FR 38101 (July 1,
2005). On the basis of Notices of Intent to Participate, adequate
substantive responses filed on behalf of domestic interested parties,
and a lack of response from respondent interested parties, the
Department conducted an expedited (120-day) sunset review. As a result
of this sunset review, the Department finds that revocation of the
antidumping duty order would likely lead to the continuation or
recurrence of dumping. The dumping margins are identified in the Final
Results of Review section of this notice.
EFFECTIVE DATE: November 7, 2005.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Hilary Sadler, Esq. or Maureen
Flannery, AD/CVD Operations, International Trade Administration, U.S.
Department of Commerce, 14th Street & Constitution Avenue, NW,
Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482-4340 or (202) 482-3020,
respectively.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
On July 1, 2005, the Department published the notice of initiation
of the sunset review of the antidumping duty order on paper clips from
China pursuant to section 751(c) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended
(``the Act''). See Initiation of Five-year (``Sunset'') Reviews, 70 FR
38101 (July 1, 2005). On July 11, 2005 and July 16, 2005, the
Department received a Notice of Intent to Participate from Officemate
International Corporation and ACCO Brands, Inc., the domestic
interested
[[Page 67434]]
parties, within the deadline specified in section 351.218(d)(1)(i) of
the Department's regulations. The domestic interested parties claimed
interested parties status under section 771(9)(C) of the Act, as
manufacturers, producers, or wholesalers in the United States of a
domestic like product. On July 29, 2005, and August 1, 2005, the
Department received complete substantive responses from the domestic
interested parties within the deadline specified in section
351.218(d)(3)(i) of the Department's regulations. The Department did
not receive a response from any respondent interested parties to this
proceeding. As a result, pursuant to section 751(c)(3)(B) of the Act
and section 351.218(e)(1)(ii)(C)(2) of the Department's regulations,
the Department conducted an expedited review of this order.
Scope of the Order
The products covered by this order are certain paper clips, wholly
of wire of base metal, whether or not galvanized, whether or not plated
with nickel or other base metal (e.g., copper), with a wire diameter
between 0.025 inches and 0.075 inches (0.64 to 1.91 millimeters),
regardless of physical configuration, except as specifically excluded.
The products subject to this order may have a rectangular or ring-like
shape and include, but are not limited to, clips commercially referred
to as No. 1 clips, No. 3 clips, Jumbo or Giant clips, Gem clips,
Frictioned clips, Perfect Gems, Marcel Gems, Universal clips, Nifty
clips, Peerless clips, Ring clips, and Glide-On clips. The products
subject to this order are currently classifiable under subheading
8305.90.3010 of the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States
(``HTSUS'').
Specifically excluded from the scope of this order are plastic and
vinyl covered paper clips, butterfly clips, binder clips, or other
paper fasteners that are not made wholly of wire of base metal and are
covered under a separate subheading of the HTSUS.
Although the HTSUS subheadings are provided for convenience and
customs purposes, the written description of the scope of this order is
dispositive.
Analysis of Comments Received
All issues raised in this review are addressed in the ``Issues and
Decision Memorandum'' (``Decision Memo'') from Stephen J. Claeys,
Deputy Assistant Secretary for AD/CVD Operations, to Joseph A.
Spetrini, Acting Assistant Secretary for Import Administration, dated
October 31, 2005, which is hereby adopted by this notice. The issues
discussed in the Decision Memo include the likelihood of continuation
or recurrence of dumping and the magnitude of the margins likely to
prevail if the order were revoked. Parties can find a complete
discussion of all issues raised in this review and the corresponding
recommendations in this public memorandum which is on file in room B-
099 of the main Commerce building.
In addition, a complete version of the Decision Memo can be
accessed directly on the Web at https://ia.ita.doc.gov/frn/. The paper
copy and electronic version of the Decision Memo are identical in
content.
Final Results of Review
We determine that revocation of the antidumping duty order on paper
clips from China would be likely to lead to continuation or recurrence
of dumping at the following weighted-average percentage margins:
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Weighted Average
Manufacturers/Exporters/Producers Margin (percent)
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Shanghai Lansheng Corporation....................... 57.64
Zhejiang Light Industrial Products Import & Export 46.01
Corporation........................................
Zhejiang Machinery and Equipment Import & Export 60.70
Corporation........................................
China-wide Rate..................................... 126.94
------------------------------------------------------------------------
This notice also serves as the only reminder to parties subject to
administrative protective order (``APO'') of their responsibility
concerning the return or destruction of proprietary information
disclosed under APO in accordance with section 351.305 of the
Department's regulations. Timely notification of the return or
destruction of APO materials or conversion to judicial protective order
is hereby requested. Failure to comply with the regulations and terms
of an APO is a violation which is subject to sanction.
We are issuing and publishing these results and notice in
accordance with sections 751(c), 752, and 777(i)(1) of the Act.
Dated: October 31, 2005.
Joseph A. Spetrini,
Acting Assistant Secretary for Import Administration.
[FR Doc. 05-22144 Filed 11-4-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-S