Certain Weather Stations and Components Thereof; Notice of Commission Decision Not To Review an Initial Determination Terminating the Investigation in Its Entirety Based on Withdrawal of the Complaint, 67194-67195 [05-22019]

Download as PDF 67194 Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 213 / Friday, November 4, 2005 / Notices change to the schedule. Absent objection from any other party, the Commission is revising its schedule. The deadline for filing prehearing briefs is January 4, 2006. The Commission’s original schedule is otherwise unchanged. For further information concerning these reviews see the Commission’s notice cited above and the Commission’s Rules of Practice and Procedure, part 201, subparts A through E (19 CFR part 201), and part 207, subparts A and C (19 CFR part 207). Authority: These reviews are being conducted under authority of title VII of the Tariff Act of 1930; this notice is published pursuant to section 207.21 of the Commission’s rules. Issued: October 31, 2005. By order of the Commission. Marilyn R. Abbott, Secretary to the Commission. [FR Doc. 05–22020 Filed 11–3–05; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 7020–02–P INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION [Inv. No. 337–TA–521] Certain Voltage Regulator Circuits, Components Thereof and Products Containing Same; Notice of a Commission Determination Not to Review an Initial Determination Terminating the Investigation on the Basis of a Consent Order and Settlement Agreement; Issuance of Consent Order International Trade Commission. ACTION: Notice. AGENCY: SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that the U.S. International Trade Commission has determined not to review an initial determination (‘‘ID’’) of the presiding administrative law judge (‘‘ALJ’’) granting the joint motion of complainant Linear Technology Corporation and respondent Monolithic Power Systems, Inc. to terminate the above-captioned investigation on the basis of a settlement agreement and consent order. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Michael K. Haldenstein, Esq., Office of the General Counsel, U.S. International Trade Commission, 500 E Street, SW., Washington, DC 20436, telephone 202– 205–3115. Copies of the public version of the ID and all nonconfidential documents filed in connection with this Chaparral Steel Company, dated September 25, 2005. VerDate Aug<31>2005 22:35 Nov 03, 2005 Jkt 208001 investigation are or will be available for inspection during official business hours (8:45 a.m. to 5:15 p.m.) in the Office of the Secretary, U.S. International Trade Commission, 500 E Street, SW., Washington, DC 20436, telephone 202–205–2000. Hearingimpaired persons are advised that information on this matter can be obtained by contacting the Commission’s TDD terminal on 202– 205–1810. General information concerning the Commission may also be obtained by accessing its Internet server (https://www.usitc.gov). The public record for this investigation may be viewed on the Commission’s electronic docket (EDIS) at https://edis.usitc.gov. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On August 17, 2004, the Commission instituted an investigation under section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, 19 U.S.C. 1337, based on a complaint filed by Linear Technology Corporation of Milpitas, California (‘‘Linear’’) alleging a violation of section 337 in the importation, sale for importation, and sale within the United States after importation of certain voltage regulator circuits, components thereof and products containing same by reason of infringement of claims 1–6, 31, 34–35, 41, 44–48, and 51–57 of U.S. Patent No. 5, 481,178 (‘‘the ‘178 patent’’), and claims 1–19, 31, 34, and 35 of U.S. Patent No. 6,580,258. 69 FR 51104 (August 17, 2004). The complainant named Monolithic Power Systems, Inc. (‘‘MPS’’) of Los Gatos, California as respondent. On March 16, 2005, the ALJ issued an ID (Order No. 12) extending the target date in the above-referenced investigation until February 17, 2006. No party petitioned for review of the ID, the Commission declined to review it, and it therefore became the determination of the Commission. The ALJ issued another ID (Order No. 16), further extending the target date to June 14, 2006. No party petitioned for review of the ID, the Commission declined to review it, and it therefore became the determination of the Commission. On September 30, 2005 Linear and MPS filed their ‘‘Joint Motion to Terminate Investigation Based Upon a Settlement Agreement and Consent Order.’’ On October 7, 2005, the Commission Investigative Staff filed a response in support of the joint motion. On October 14, 2005, the ALJ issued the subject ID terminating the investigation on the basis of a settlement agreement and consent order. No party petitioned for review of the ID pursuant to 19 CFR 210.43(a), and the Commission found no basis for PO 00000 Frm 00060 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 ordering a review on its own initiative pursuant to 19 CFR 210.44. The ID thus has become the determination of the Commission pursuant to 19 CFR 210.42(h)(3). This action is taken under the authority of section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, 19 U.S.C. 1337, and Commission rule 210.42, 19 CFR 210.42. Issued: October 31, 2005. By order of the Commission. Marilyn R. Abbott, Secretary to the Commission. [FR Doc. 05–22018 Filed 11–3–05; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 7020–02–P INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION [Inv. No. 337–TA–537] Certain Weather Stations and Components Thereof; Notice of Commission Decision Not To Review an Initial Determination Terminating the Investigation in Its Entirety Based on Withdrawal of the Complaint International Trade Commission. ACTION: Notice. AGENCY: SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that the U.S. International Trade Commission has determined not to review the presiding administrative law judge’s (‘‘ALJ’’) initial determination (‘‘ID’’) terminating the above-captioned investigation as to all the respondents on the basis of withdrawal of the complaint. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Rodney Maze, Esq., Office of the General Counsel, U.S. International Trade Commission, 500 E Street, SW., Washington, DC 20436, telephone (202) 205–3065. Copies of non-confidential documents filed in connection with this investigation are or will be available for inspection during official business hours (8:45 a.m. to 5:15 p.m.) in the Office of the Secretary, U.S. International Trade Commission, 500 E Street, SW., Washington, DC 20436, telephone (202) 205–2000. General information concerning the Commission may also be obtained by accessing its Internet server (https://www.usitc.gov). The public record for this investigation may be viewed on the Commission’s electronic docket (EDIS) at https:// edis.usitc.gov. Hearing-impaired persons are advised that information on this matter can be obtained by contacting the Commission’s TDD terminal on (202) 205–1810. E:\FR\FM\04NON1.SGM 04NON1 Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 213 / Friday, November 4, 2005 / Notices This patent-based section 337 investigation was instituted by the Commission based on a complaint filed by Richmond IP Holdings, LLC (‘‘Richmond’’), of Richmond, Virginia. 70 FR 19969 (April 15, 2005). Richmond alleged violations of section 337 in the importation into the United States, the sale for importation, and the sale within the United States after importation of certain weather stations and components thereof by reason of infringement of claim 1 of U.S. Patent No. 5,978,738 and claims 26 and 30 of U.S. Patent No. 6,076,044 (‘‘the ‘044 patent’’). The complaint and notice of investigation named Hideki Electronics, Inc. of Tualatin, Oregon; Hideki Electronics, Ltd. of Hong Kong; Homedics-U.S.A., Inc. (‘‘Homedics’’) of Commerce Township, Michigan; K&P International Holdings Limited of Hong Kong; Springfield Precision Instruments, Inc. (‘‘Springfield’’) of Wood Ridge, New Jersey; and Taylor Precision Products, LLC (‘‘Taylor’’) of Oak Brook, Illinois as respondents. On August 3, 2005, Richmond filed a motion to terminate the investigation in part requesting that it be permitted to withdraw the allegations regarding the ‘044 patent. On August 9, 2005, Richmond filed a motion for withdrawal of the entire complaint and termination of the investigation as to all the named respondents. On August 15, 2005, respondents Hideki Electronics, Inc.; Hideki Electronics, Ltd.; and K&P International Holdings Limited filed a joint response supporting Richmond’s motion but requesting that the ALJ issue sanctions against Richmond. On August 19, 2005, the Commission investigative attorney filed a response supporting Richmond’s motion to withdraw while opposing sanctions. On August 22, 2005, respondent Springfield filed a response opposing Richmond’s motion to withdraw and terminate the investigation. Springfield also requested that the ALJ defer ruling on the motion so that the Commission could issue a show cause order to Richmond and condition any withdrawal on the payment of attorneys’ fees and expenses. Respondents Homedics and Taylor did not file responses to Richmond’s motion to withdraw. On October 12, 2005, the ALJ issued an ID (Order No. 8) granting Richmond’s motion for withdrawal of the complaint and termination of the investigation as to all the respondents. No petitions to review the ID were filed. The Commission has determined not to review this ID. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: VerDate Aug<31>2005 22:35 Nov 03, 2005 Jkt 208001 Issued: October 31, 2005. By order of the Commission. Marilyn R. Abbott, Secretary to the Commission. [FR Doc. 05–22019 Filed 11–3–05; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 7020–02–P DEPARTMENT OF LABOR Employment and Training Administration [TA–W–58,118] Innovion; Gresham, OR; Notice of Termination of Investigation Pursuant to Section 221 of the Trade Act of 1974, as amended, an investigation was initiated on October 12, 2005 in response to a worker petition filed by a company official on behalf of workers at Innovion, Gresham, Oregon. The petitioners have requested that the petition be withdrawn. Consequently, the investigation has been terminated. Signed at Washington, DC, this 18th day of October, 2005. Elliott S. Kushner, Certifying Officer, Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance. [FR Doc. E5–6136 Filed 11–3–05; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4510–30–P 67195 subject firm are being reported under the Unemployment Insurance (UI) tax account for RVL Printed Labels, Statesville, North Carolina. Accordingly, the Department is amending the certification to properly reflect this matter. The intent of the Department’s certification is to include all workers of Avery Dennison Corporation who were adversely affected by a shift in production abroad. The amended notice applicable to TA–W–57,926 is hereby issued as follows: ‘‘All workers of Avery Dennison Corporation, RVL Printed Labels, Statesville, North Carolina, who became totally or partially separated from employment on or after September 9, 2004, through September 23, 2007, are eligible to apply for adjustment assistance under Section 223 of the Trade Act of 1974.’’ Signed at Washington, DC, this 19th day of October 2005. Richard Church, Certifying Officer, Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance. [FR Doc. E5–6131 Filed 11–3–05; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4510–30–P DEPARTMENT OF LABOR Employment and Training Administration [TA–W–57,651] DEPARTMENT OF LABOR Cerwin Vega, Inc.; a Florida Corporation; a Division of Stanton Magnetics, Inc.; Chatsworth, CA; Dismissal of Application for Reconsideration Employment and Training Administration [TA–W–57,926] Avery Dennison Corporation; RVL Printed Labels, Statesville, NC; Amended Certification Regarding Eligibility to Apply for Worker Adjustment Assistance In accordance with Section 223 of the Trade Act of 1974 (19 U.S.C. 2273), the Department of Labor issued a Certification of Eligibility to Apply for Worker Adjustment Assistance on September 23, 2005, applicable to workers of Avery Dennison Corporation, Statesville, North Carolina. The notice will be published soon in the Federal Register. At the request of the company and the State agency, the Department reviewed the certification for workers of the subject firm. The workers are engaged in the production of printed fabric labels. New information shows that in November 2002, Avery Dennison Corporation purchased RVL Printed Labels and that workers wages at the PO 00000 Frm 00061 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 Pursuant to 29 CFR 90.18(C) an application for administrative reconsideration was filed with the Director of the Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance for workers at Cerwin Vega, Inc., A Florida Corporation, A Division of Stanton Magnetics, Inc., Chatsworth, California. The application contained no new substantial information which would bear importantly on the Department’s determination. Therefore, dismissal of the application was issued. TA–W–57,651; Cerwin Vega, Inc., a Florida Corporation, a Division of Stanton Magnetics, Inc., Chatsworth, California (October 20, 2005). Signed at Washington, DC, this 26th day of October 2005. Douglas F. Small, Acting Director, Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance. [FR Doc. E5–6125 Filed 11–3–05; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4510–30–P E:\FR\FM\04NON1.SGM 04NON1

Agencies

INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION

[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 213 (Friday, November 4, 2005)]
[Notices]
[Pages 67194-67195]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-22019]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION

[Inv. No. 337-TA-537]


Certain Weather Stations and Components Thereof; Notice of 
Commission Decision Not To Review an Initial Determination Terminating 
the Investigation in Its Entirety Based on Withdrawal of the Complaint

AGENCY: International Trade Commission.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that the U.S. International Trade 
Commission has determined not to review the presiding administrative 
law judge's (``ALJ'') initial determination (``ID'') terminating the 
above-captioned investigation as to all the respondents on the basis of 
withdrawal of the complaint.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Rodney Maze, Esq., Office of the 
General Counsel, U.S. International Trade Commission, 500 E Street, 
SW., Washington, DC 20436, telephone (202) 205-3065. Copies of non-
confidential documents filed in connection with this investigation are 
or will be available for inspection during official business hours 
(8:45 a.m. to 5:15 p.m.) in the Office of the Secretary, U.S. 
International Trade Commission, 500 E Street, SW., Washington, DC 
20436, telephone (202) 205-2000. General information concerning the 
Commission may also be obtained by accessing its Internet server 
(https://www.usitc.gov). The public record for this investigation may be 
viewed on the Commission's electronic docket (EDIS) at https://
edis.usitc.gov. Hearing-impaired persons are advised that information 
on this matter can be obtained by contacting the Commission's TDD 
terminal on (202) 205-1810.

[[Page 67195]]


SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This patent-based section 337 investigation 
was instituted by the Commission based on a complaint filed by Richmond 
IP Holdings, LLC (``Richmond''), of Richmond, Virginia. 70 FR 19969 
(April 15, 2005). Richmond alleged violations of section 337 in the 
importation into the United States, the sale for importation, and the 
sale within the United States after importation of certain weather 
stations and components thereof by reason of infringement of claim 1 of 
U.S. Patent No. 5,978,738 and claims 26 and 30 of U.S. Patent No. 
6,076,044 (``the `044 patent''). The complaint and notice of 
investigation named Hideki Electronics, Inc. of Tualatin, Oregon; 
Hideki Electronics, Ltd. of Hong Kong; Homedics-U.S.A., Inc. 
(``Homedics'') of Commerce Township, Michigan; K&P International 
Holdings Limited of Hong Kong; Springfield Precision Instruments, Inc. 
(``Springfield'') of Wood Ridge, New Jersey; and Taylor Precision 
Products, LLC (``Taylor'') of Oak Brook, Illinois as respondents.
    On August 3, 2005, Richmond filed a motion to terminate the 
investigation in part requesting that it be permitted to withdraw the 
allegations regarding the `044 patent. On August 9, 2005, Richmond 
filed a motion for withdrawal of the entire complaint and termination 
of the investigation as to all the named respondents.
    On August 15, 2005, respondents Hideki Electronics, Inc.; Hideki 
Electronics, Ltd.; and K&P International Holdings Limited filed a joint 
response supporting Richmond's motion but requesting that the ALJ issue 
sanctions against Richmond. On August 19, 2005, the Commission 
investigative attorney filed a response supporting Richmond's motion to 
withdraw while opposing sanctions.
    On August 22, 2005, respondent Springfield filed a response 
opposing Richmond's motion to withdraw and terminate the investigation. 
Springfield also requested that the ALJ defer ruling on the motion so 
that the Commission could issue a show cause order to Richmond and 
condition any withdrawal on the payment of attorneys' fees and 
expenses. Respondents Homedics and Taylor did not file responses to 
Richmond's motion to withdraw.
    On October 12, 2005, the ALJ issued an ID (Order No. 8) granting 
Richmond's motion for withdrawal of the complaint and termination of 
the investigation as to all the respondents. No petitions to review the 
ID were filed. The Commission has determined not to review this ID.

    Issued: October 31, 2005.

    By order of the Commission.
Marilyn R. Abbott,
Secretary to the Commission.
[FR Doc. 05-22019 Filed 11-3-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7020-02-P

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.