Certain Flash Memory Devices and Components Thereof, and Products Containing Such Devices and Components; Notice of Investigation, 67192-67193 [05-22017]
Download as PDF
67192
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 213 / Friday, November 4, 2005 / Notices
INTERNATIONAL BOUNDARY AND
WATER COMMISSION; UNITED
STATES AND MEXICO
United States Section; Notice of
Availability of a Final Environmental
Assessment and Finding of No
Significant Impact for Alternatives for
Improved Flood Control of the Hidalgo
Protective Levee System, in the Lower
Rio Grande Flood Control Project,
Located in Hidalgo County, TX.
United States Section,
International Boundary and Water
Commission (USIBWC), United States
and Mexico.
ACTION: Notice of Availability of Final
Environmental Assessment (EA) and
Finding of No Significant Impact
(FONSI).
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: Pursuant to Section 102(2)(c)
of the National Environmental Policy
Act of 1969; the Council on
Environmental Quality Final
Regulations (40 CFR Parts 1500 through
1508); and the USIBWC’s Operational
Procedures for Implementing Section
102 of NEPA, published in the Federal
Register September 2, 1981, (46 FR
44083); the USIBWC hereby gives notice
that the Final Environmental
Assessment and Finding of No
Significant Impact for Alternatives for
Improved Flood Control of the Hidalgo
Protective Levee System, in the Lower
Rio Grande Flood Control Project,
located in Hidalgo County, Texas are
available. A notice of finding of no
significant impact dated June 30, 2005,
provided a thirty (30) day comment
period before making the finding final.
The Notice was published in the
Federal Register on July 8, 2005 (70 FR
39527).
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Gilbert Anaya, Environmental
Management Division; United States
Section, International Boundary and
Water Commission; 4171 N. Mesa, C–
100; El Paso, Texas 79902. Telephone:
(915) 832–4703, e-mail:
gilbertanaya@ibwc.state.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Proposed Action
The USIBWC is considering
alternatives to raise the Hidalgo
Protective Levee System. The proposed
action will take place in two
construction phases, each covering
separate geographic reaches of the
Hidalgo Protective Levee System. Phase
1 encompasses the upstream 3.3-mile
reach of the levee system, from the
Hidalgo Levee junction with the
LRGFCP Main Floodway, to the west
margin of the Hidalgo-Reynosa
VerDate Aug<31>2005
22:35 Nov 03, 2005
Jkt 208001
International Bridge. Phase 2, for
subsequent implementation, covers the
1.2-mile downstream reach starting at
the international bridge. The phased
construction approach responds to the
likely availability of early funding for
Phase 1, the upstream reach of the
project.
In-place increase of levee height
under the Phase 1 Footprint Expansion
Alternative is the Proposed Action for
Phase 1 of the project. This alternative
will increase flood containment
capacity by raising the height of the
existing compacted earthen levee to
meet the freeboard requirement
indicated by the hydraulic model. Soil
borrow easements will be used to secure
levee material.
Partial rerouting of the 1.2-mile
downstream reach of the levee system
under the Partial Levee Rerouting
Alternative is the Phase 2 Proposed
Action. Levee rerouting is proposed to
eliminate the need for construction of a
floodwall in front of the Hidalgo
Historic Pumphouse, a resource
included in the National Register of
Historic Places (NRHP). A new levee
segment, approximately 0.7 mile in
length, will be built along the south
margin of the pumphouse intake
channel, and the channel will be
crossed to tie the new structure to the
existing levee system. Floodwall
placement will be required along the
Hidalgo-Reynosa International Bridge.
Alternatives under consideration to
improve the Hidalgo Protective Levee
System will expand the levee footprint
by lateral extension of the structure.
Levee footprint increases toward the
riverside could potentially extend into
floodplain areas designated by the U.S.
Fish and Wildlife Service as part of the
Lower Rio Grande Valley (LRGV)
National Wildlife Refuge System.
Footprint increases toward the levee
landside could extend beyond the
USIBWC right-of-way.
Phase 2 Alternatives
A Phase 2 No Action Alternative and
two action alternatives to the Proposed
Action were evaluated for Phase 2 of the
levee system improvement project: the
Footprint Expansion Alternative, and
the No-Footprint Expansion Alternative.
Under the Phase 2 No Action
Alternative, the existing Hidalgo
Protective Levee System would be
retained in its current configuration
along levee miles 3.3 to 4.5.
Under the Phase 2 Footprint
Expansion Alternative, height of the
existing levee would be increased with
the associated lateral expansion of the
footprint. Placement of floodwalls
would be required at two segments
where retaining walls are currently
present: along the two spans of the
Hidalgo-Reynosa International Bridge,
and along the Hidalgo Historic
Pumphouse.
Under the No-Footprint Expansion
Alternative, a mechanically stabilized
earth structure along the levee crown
would eliminate the need for an
expanded earthen levee and footprint
expansion. Floodwall placement would
be required both at the Hidalgo Historic
Pumphouse and along the two spans of
the Hidalgo-Reynosa International
Bridge.
Availability
Single hard copies of the Final
Environmental Assessment and final
Finding of No Significant Impact may be
obtained by request at the above
address. Electronic copies may also be
obtained from the USIBWC Home Page
at https://www.ibwc.state.gov.
Dated: October 24, 2005.
Susan Daniel,
General Counsel.
[FR Doc. 05–22089 Filed 11–3–05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7010–01–P
INTERNATIONAL TRADE
COMMISSION
Alternatives Considered
[Inv. No. 337–TA–552]
Phase 1 Alternative
Certain Flash Memory Devices and
Components Thereof, and Products
Containing Such Devices and
Components; Notice of Investigation
A Phase 1 No Action Alternative was
evaluated for the 3.3-mile upstream
reach of the levee system. This
alternative would retain the existing
configuration of the Hidalgo Protective
Levee System, as designed over 30 years
ago, and the current level of protection
currently associated with this system.
Under severe storm events, current
containment capacity will be
insufficient to fully control Rio Grande
flooding with risks to personal safety
and property.
PO 00000
Frm 00058
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
U.S. International Trade
Commission.
ACTION: Institution of investigation
pursuant to 19 U.S.C. 1337.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that a
complaint was filed with the U.S.
International Trade Commission on
September 29, 2005, under section 337
of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended,
E:\FR\FM\04NON1.SGM
04NON1
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 213 / Friday, November 4, 2005 / Notices
19 U.S.C. 1337, on behalf of Toshiba
Corporation of Tokyo, Japan. A
supplemental letter was filed on
October 20, 2005. The complaint alleges
violations of section 337 in the
importation into the United States, the
sale for importation, and the sale within
the United States after importation of
certain flash memory devices and
components thereof, and products
containing such devices and
components, by reason of infringement
of claims 1–4 of U.S. Patent No.
5,150,178, claims 1 and 6–7 of U.S.
Patent No. 5,270,969, and claims 1 and
4 of U.S. Patent No. 5,517,449. The
complaint further alleges that an
industry in the United States exists as
required by subsection (a)(2) of section
337.
The complainant requests that the
Commission institute an investigation
and, after the investigation, issue a
permanent exclusion order and
permanent cease and desist orders.
ADDRESSES: The complaint, except for
any confidential information contained
therein, is available for inspection
during official business hours (8:45 a.m.
to 5:15 p.m.) in the Office of the
Secretary, U.S. International Trade
Commission, 500 E Street, SW., Room
112, Washington, DC 20436, telephone
202–205–2000. Hearing impaired
individuals are advised that information
on this matter can be obtained by
contacting the Commission’s TDD
terminal on 202–205–1810. Persons
with mobility impairments who will
need special assistance in gaining access
to the Commission should contact the
Office of the Secretary at 202–205–2000.
General information concerning the
Commission may also be obtained by
accessing its Internet server at https://
www.usitc.gov. The public record for
this investigation may be viewed on the
Commission’s electronic docket (EDIS)
at https://edis.usitc.gov.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Bryan F. Moore, Esq., Office of Unfair
Import Investigations, U.S. International
Trade Commission, telephone 202–205–
2767.
Authority: The authority for institution of
this investigation is contained in section 337
of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, and
in section 210.10 of the Commission’s Rules
of Practice and Procedure, 19 CFR 210.10
(2005).
Scope of Investigation: Having
considered the complaint, the U.S.
International Trade Commission, on
October 31, 2005, Ordered That—
(1) Pursuant to subsection (b) of
section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as
amended, an investigation be instituted
to determine whether there is a
VerDate Aug<31>2005
22:35 Nov 03, 2005
Jkt 208001
violation of subsection (a)(1)(B) of
section 337 in the importation into the
United States, the sale for importation,
or the sale within the United States after
importation of certain flash memory
devices or components thereof, or
products containing such devices or
components, by reason of infringement
of one or more of claims 1–4 of U.S.
Patent No. 5,150,178, claims 1 and 6–7
of U.S. Patent No. 5,270,969, and claims
1 and 4 of U.S. Patent No. 5,517,449,
and whether an industry in the United
States exists as required by subsection
(a)(2) of section 337.
(2) For the purpose of the
investigation so instituted, the following
are hereby named as parties upon which
this notice of investigation shall be
served:
(a) The complainant is:
Toshiba Corporation, 1–1 Shibaura 1–
Chome, Minato-KU, Tokyo 105–8001,
Japan.
(b) The respondents are the following
companies alleged to be in violation of
section 337, and are the parties upon
which the complaint is to be served:
Hynix Semiconductor, San 136–1,
Ami-Ri Bubal-eub, 1chon-si, Kyoungkido, Korea.
Hynix Semiconductor America, Inc.,
3101 North First Street, San Jose,
California 95134.
(c) Bryan F. Moore, Esq., Office of
Unfair Import Investigations, U.S.
International Trade Commission, 500 E
Street, SW., Suite 401, Washington, DC
20436, who shall be the Commission
investigative attorney, party to this
investigation; and
(3) For the investigation so instituted,
the Honorable Paul J. Luckern is
designated as the presiding
administrative law judge.
Responses to the complaint and the
notice of investigation must be
submitted by the named respondents in
accordance with section 210.13 of the
Commission’s Rules of Practice and
Procedure, 19 CFR 210.13. Pursuant to
19 CFR 201.16(d) and 210.13(a), such
responses will be considered by the
Commission if received not later than 20
days after the date of service by the
Commission of the complaint and the
notice of investigation. Extensions of
time for submitting responses to the
complaint and the notice of
investigation will not be granted unless
good cause therefor is shown.
Failure of a respondent to file a timely
response to each allegation in the
complaint and in this notice may be
deemed to constitute a waiver of the
right to appear and contest the
allegations of the complaint and this
notice, and to authorize the
administrative law judge and the
PO 00000
Frm 00059
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
67193
Commission, without further notice to
the respondent, to find the facts to be as
alleged in the complaint and this notice
and to enter a final determination
containing such findings, and may
result in the issuance of a limited
exclusion order or cease and desist
order or both directed against the
respondent.
Issued: October 31, 2005.
By order of the Commission.
Marilyn R. Abbott,
Secretary to the Commission.
[FR Doc. 05–22017 Filed 11–3–05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7020–02–P
INTERNATIONAL TRADE
COMMISSION
[Investigation Nos. 701–TA–401 (Review)
and 731–TA–853 and 854 (Review)]
Structural Steel Beams from Japan and
Korea
United States International
Trade Commission.
ACTION: Revised schedule for the subject
reviews.
AGENCY:
DATES:
Effective October 19, 2005.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Joann Tortorice (202–205–3032) or
Douglas Corkran (202–205–3057), Office
of Investigations, U.S. International
Trade Commission, 500 E Street SW.,
Washington, DC 20436. Hearingimpaired persons can obtain
information on this matter by contacting
the Commission’s TDD terminal on 202–
205–1810. Persons with mobility
impairments who will need special
assistance in gaining access to the
Commission should contact the Office
of the Secretary at 202–205–2000.
General information concerning the
Commission may also be obtained by
accessing its Internet server (https://
www.usitc.gov). The public record for
these reviews may be viewed on the
Commission’s electronic docket (EDIS)
at https://edis.usitc.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Effective
September 9, 2005, the Commission
established a schedule for the conduct
of the subject reviews (70 FR 54962,
September 19, 2005). Subsequently,
counsel for domestic interested parties
requested that the Commission extend
the date for filing prehearing briefs by
two business days to alleviate the
hardship placed on administrative
personnel.1 Counsel suggested no other
1 Letter to the Secretary of the Commission from
Wiley Rein & Fielding, on behalf of Nucor Corp.,
Nucor-Yamato Steel Co., Steel Dynamics, Inc., and
E:\FR\FM\04NON1.SGM
Continued
04NON1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 213 (Friday, November 4, 2005)]
[Notices]
[Pages 67192-67193]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-22017]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION
[Inv. No. 337-TA-552]
Certain Flash Memory Devices and Components Thereof, and Products
Containing Such Devices and Components; Notice of Investigation
AGENCY: U.S. International Trade Commission.
ACTION: Institution of investigation pursuant to 19 U.S.C. 1337.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that a complaint was filed with the
U.S. International Trade Commission on September 29, 2005, under
section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended,
[[Page 67193]]
19 U.S.C. 1337, on behalf of Toshiba Corporation of Tokyo, Japan. A
supplemental letter was filed on October 20, 2005. The complaint
alleges violations of section 337 in the importation into the United
States, the sale for importation, and the sale within the United States
after importation of certain flash memory devices and components
thereof, and products containing such devices and components, by reason
of infringement of claims 1-4 of U.S. Patent No. 5,150,178, claims 1
and 6-7 of U.S. Patent No. 5,270,969, and claims 1 and 4 of U.S. Patent
No. 5,517,449. The complaint further alleges that an industry in the
United States exists as required by subsection (a)(2) of section 337.
The complainant requests that the Commission institute an
investigation and, after the investigation, issue a permanent exclusion
order and permanent cease and desist orders.
ADDRESSES: The complaint, except for any confidential information
contained therein, is available for inspection during official business
hours (8:45 a.m. to 5:15 p.m.) in the Office of the Secretary, U.S.
International Trade Commission, 500 E Street, SW., Room 112,
Washington, DC 20436, telephone 202-205-2000. Hearing impaired
individuals are advised that information on this matter can be obtained
by contacting the Commission's TDD terminal on 202-205-1810. Persons
with mobility impairments who will need special assistance in gaining
access to the Commission should contact the Office of the Secretary at
202-205-2000. General information concerning the Commission may also be
obtained by accessing its Internet server at https://www.usitc.gov. The
public record for this investigation may be viewed on the Commission's
electronic docket (EDIS) at https://edis.usitc.gov.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Bryan F. Moore, Esq., Office of Unfair
Import Investigations, U.S. International Trade Commission, telephone
202-205-2767.
Authority: The authority for institution of this investigation
is contained in section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended,
and in section 210.10 of the Commission's Rules of Practice and
Procedure, 19 CFR 210.10 (2005).
Scope of Investigation: Having considered the complaint, the U.S.
International Trade Commission, on October 31, 2005, Ordered That--
(1) Pursuant to subsection (b) of section 337 of the Tariff Act of
1930, as amended, an investigation be instituted to determine whether
there is a violation of subsection (a)(1)(B) of section 337 in the
importation into the United States, the sale for importation, or the
sale within the United States after importation of certain flash memory
devices or components thereof, or products containing such devices or
components, by reason of infringement of one or more of claims 1-4 of
U.S. Patent No. 5,150,178, claims 1 and 6-7 of U.S. Patent No.
5,270,969, and claims 1 and 4 of U.S. Patent No. 5,517,449, and whether
an industry in the United States exists as required by subsection
(a)(2) of section 337.
(2) For the purpose of the investigation so instituted, the
following are hereby named as parties upon which this notice of
investigation shall be served:
(a) The complainant is:
Toshiba Corporation, 1-1 Shibaura 1-Chome, Minato-KU, Tokyo 105-
8001, Japan.
(b) The respondents are the following companies alleged to be in
violation of section 337, and are the parties upon which the complaint
is to be served:
Hynix Semiconductor, San 136-1, Ami-Ri Bubal-eub, 1chon-si,
Kyoungki-do, Korea.
Hynix Semiconductor America, Inc., 3101 North First Street, San
Jose, California 95134.
(c) Bryan F. Moore, Esq., Office of Unfair Import Investigations,
U.S. International Trade Commission, 500 E Street, SW., Suite 401,
Washington, DC 20436, who shall be the Commission investigative
attorney, party to this investigation; and
(3) For the investigation so instituted, the Honorable Paul J.
Luckern is designated as the presiding administrative law judge.
Responses to the complaint and the notice of investigation must be
submitted by the named respondents in accordance with section 210.13 of
the Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure, 19 CFR 210.13.
Pursuant to 19 CFR 201.16(d) and 210.13(a), such responses will be
considered by the Commission if received not later than 20 days after
the date of service by the Commission of the complaint and the notice
of investigation. Extensions of time for submitting responses to the
complaint and the notice of investigation will not be granted unless
good cause therefor is shown.
Failure of a respondent to file a timely response to each
allegation in the complaint and in this notice may be deemed to
constitute a waiver of the right to appear and contest the allegations
of the complaint and this notice, and to authorize the administrative
law judge and the Commission, without further notice to the respondent,
to find the facts to be as alleged in the complaint and this notice and
to enter a final determination containing such findings, and may result
in the issuance of a limited exclusion order or cease and desist order
or both directed against the respondent.
Issued: October 31, 2005.
By order of the Commission.
Marilyn R. Abbott,
Secretary to the Commission.
[FR Doc. 05-22017 Filed 11-3-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7020-02-P