Self-Regulatory Organizations; Philadelphia Stock Exchange, Inc.; Order Granting Approval to a Proposed Rule Change and Amendments No. 2, 3, and 5 Thereto Relating to the Adoption of New Rules That Would Establish an Automated Opening System on the Exchange, 65953-65956 [E5-6027]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 210 / Tuesday, November 1, 2005 / Notices
Moreover, the proposed rule change
sets forth in detail provisions relating to
the content and signature requirements
for offers of settlement, as well as
waivers of certain rights upon
submission of an offer of settlement.
Additionally, the proposal provides for
quarterly review by the BCC and the
Board Appeals Committee of final
disciplinary actions in order to provide
the Department of Enforcement and
General Counsel with guidance on
future settlement practices and
settlement amounts. The Commission
believes that this provision is
reasonably designed to provide for BCC
and Board input, albeit on a prospective
basis only, on the Exchange’s
disciplinary program, thereby providing
a mechanism for the Board to comply
with the self-regulatory organization’s
responsibility to maintain an adequate
and effective disciplinary system.
The Commission finds good cause for
approving this proposal before the
thirtieth day after the publication of
notice thereof in the Federal Register.
Accelerating approval of the proposal
will allow the Exchange to implement,
without undue delay, a more efficient
process for reviewing and deciding
upon offers of settlement, while
maintaining ETP Holder involvement in
the settlement process. In addition, the
Commission notes that the NASD has a
substantially similar rule with respect to
offers of settlement.
V. Conclusion
It is therefore ordered, pursuant to
section 19(b)(2) of the Act,24 that the
proposed rule change, as amended (SR–
PCX–2005–76), is hereby approved on
an accelerated basis.
For the Commission, by the Division of
Market Regulation, pursuant to delegated
authority.25
Jonathan G. Katz,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. E5–6026 Filed 10–31–05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8010–01–P
24 15
25 17
U.S.C. 78s(b)(2).
CFR 200.30–3(a)(12).
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:39 Oct 31, 2005
Jkt 208001
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
COMMISSION
[Release No. 34–52667; File No. SR-Phlx2005–25]
Self-Regulatory Organizations;
Philadelphia Stock Exchange, Inc.;
Order Granting Approval to a
Proposed Rule Change and
Amendments No. 2, 3, and 5 Thereto
Relating to the Adoption of New Rules
That Would Establish an Automated
Opening System on the Exchange
October 25, 2005.
I. Introduction
On April 21, 2005, the Philadelphia
Stock Exchange, Inc. (‘‘Phlx’’ or
‘‘Exchange’’) filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission
(‘‘Commission’’) pursuant to Section
19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934 (‘‘Act’’) 1, and Rule 19b–4 2
thereunder, a proposed rule change that
would establish an automated opening
system on the Exchange. The Exchange
submitted Amendments No. 1,3 2,4 and
3 5 to its proposal on June 1, 2005,
September 1, 2005, and September 14,
2005, respectively. The proposed rule
change, as amended, was published for
comment in the Federal Register on
September 22, 2005.6 No comments
were received on the proposal. The Phlx
submitted Amendment No. 4 7 on
September 23, 2005, and Amendment
No. 5 8 on September 26, 2005. This
order approves the proposed rule
change, as amended.
1 15
U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
CFR 240.19b–4.
3 See Form 19b–4, dated June 1, 2005
(‘‘Amendment No. 1’’). Amendment No. 1 replaced
the original filing in its entirety.
4 See Form 19b–4, dated September 1, 2005
(‘‘Amendment No. 2’’). Amendment No. 2 replaced
Amendment No. 1 in its entirety.
5 See Form 19b–4, dated September 14, 2005
(‘‘Amendment No. 3’’). In Amendment No. 3, Phlx,
in part, deleted proposed rule text to clarify that
during a manual opening all market orders are to
be executed at one price.
6 See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 52448
(September 15, 2005), 70 FR 55650.
7 See Form 19b–4, dated September 23, 2005. The
Exchange subsequently submitted Amendment No.
5, which was intended to supercede and replace
Amendment No. 4. As a result, the Exchange
withdrew Amendment No. 4 on October 19, 2005.
See Form 19b–4, dated October 19, 2005.
8 See Form 19b–4, dated September 26, 2005. In
Amendment No. 5, the Exchange made technical
changes to accurately reflect the differences
between proposed rule language and current rule
text, as well as made technical changes to better
conform Exhibits 4 and 5 to each other. The Act
does not require notice and comment for technical
amendments.
2 17
PO 00000
Frm 00077
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
65953
II. Description of the Proposed Rule
Change
In July 2004, the Exchange began
trading options on its new electronic
options trading platform, Phlx XL.9
Because Phlx XL does not currently
include an automated opening
functionality, specialists are currently
required to open option series manually.
The proposed rule change would
establish a fully automated opening
system for options traded on Phlx XL as
part of the Phlx XL system.
Pre-Opening
For a period of time before the
scheduled opening in the underlying
security (and not less than one hour as
determined by the Options Committee
with notice to the membership via
Exchange circular), Phlx XL will accept
orders and quotes during the ‘‘PreOpening Phase.’’ The Phlx XL system
will disseminate to specialists,
Streaming Quote Traders (‘‘SQTs’’),
Remote Streaming Quote Traders
(‘‘RSQTs’’), and non-SQT ROTs who are
required to submit continuous twosided electronic quotations pursuant to
Exchange Rule 1014(b)(ii)(E) 10
(collectively, for purposes of proposed
Phlx Rule 1017, ‘‘Phlx XL participants’’)
information about resting orders on the
book that remain from the previous
trading session and orders submitted
prior to the opening.
Calculation of Opening Price
The system will calculate an
Anticipated Opening Price (‘‘AOP’’) and
Anticipated Opening Size (‘‘AOS’’)
when a quote or trade has been
disseminated by the primary market for
the underlying security, under the
conditions set forth below. The
specialist assigned in the particular
option must enter opening quotes not
later than one minute following the
dissemination of a quote or trade by the
primary market for the underlying
security.
An AOP may be calculated only if: (i)
The Exchange has received market
orders, or the book is crossed (highest
bid is higher than the lowest offer) or
locked (highest bid equals the lowest
offer); and (ii) either (A) the specialist’s
9 See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 50100
(July 27, 2004), 69 FR 44612 (August 3, 2004) (SR–
Phlx–2003–59).
10 Exchange Rule 1014(b)(ii)(E) requires non-SQT
ROTs who transact more than 20% of their contract
volume in an option electronically versus in open
outcry during a particular calendar quarter to
submit proprietary electronic quotations in such an
option during the subsequent calendar quarter for
a certain number of series in such option,
depending on the percent of total volume transacted
electronically versus in open outcry on the
Exchange in such option.
E:\FR\FM\01NON1.SGM
01NON1
65954
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 210 / Tuesday, November 1, 2005 / Notices
quote has been submitted; (B) the quotes
of at least two Phlx XL participants that
are required to submit continuous, twosided quotes in 100% of the series in all
option issues in which such Phlx XL
participant is assigned (‘‘100%
participants’’),11 have been submitted
within two minutes of the opening trade
or quote on the primary market for the
underlying security (or such shorter
time as determined by the Options
Committee and disseminated to the
membership via Exchange Circular); or
(C) if neither the specialist’s quote 12 nor
the quotes of two 100% participants
have been submitted within two
minutes of the opening trade or quote
on the primary market for the
underlying security (or such shorter
time as determined by the Options
Committee and disseminated to the
membership via Exchange Circular), one
100% participant has submitted its
quote.
Opening Order/Quote Imbalance
In situations where an AOP may be
calculated (i.e., when the conditions
described above are present) and there
is an order/quote imbalance, the system
will immediately send an imbalance
notice indicating the imbalance side
(buy or sell) and the AOP and AOS (an
‘‘Imbalance Notice’’) to Phlx XL
participants assigned to the options
class provided that the primary market
for the underlying security has
disseminated an opening quote or trade.
Phlx XL participants may then submit
their opening or revised opening quotes.
Thereafter the system will disseminate
an updated Imbalance Notice every five
seconds (or such shorter period as
determined by the Options Committee
and disseminated to membership via
Exchange Circular) until the series is
open. If no imbalance exists, no
Imbalance Notice will be sent, and the
system will establish an opening price
as described below.
Actual Opening Price
The proposal would establish the
opening price of a series in situations
where there is no opening quote/order
imbalance. Proposed Phlx Rule
1017(c)(i) would define the opening
price as the price at which the
11 An example of a 100% participant is a new
category of ROT on the Exchange known as a
‘‘Directed SQT’’ or a ‘‘Directed RSQT,’’ defined as
an SQT or RSQT that receives a Directed Order. See
Securities Exchange Act Release No. 51759 (May
27, 2005), 70 FR 32860 (June 6, 2005) (SR–Phlx–
2004–91).
12 For example, a specialist may not submit a
quote due to systems malfunctions. A specialist,
however, who fails to submit opening quotes within
one minute of the opening on the primary market
would be subject to possible disciplinary action.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:39 Oct 31, 2005
Jkt 208001
maximum quantity of contracts would
be traded. The proposed rule would
establish a series of ‘‘tie-breakers’’ that
the system would follow in establishing
the opening price when two or more
prices would satisfy the maximum
quantity criteria. Specifically, when the
maximum quantity of contracts could be
traded at two or more prices, the system
would establish the opening price based
on the following criteria, in order: (1)
The price at which the greatest number
of customer orders would be traded; (2)
the price at which the maximum
number of Phlx XL participants would
trade; and (3) the price that is closest to
the closing price from the previous
trading session.
Priority on Openings
The system will give priority to
market orders first (including a limit
order to buy which is at a higher price
than the price at which the option is to
be opened and a limit order to sell
which is at a lower price than the price
at which the option is to be opened,
which will be treated as market orders),
then to resting limit orders at the
opening price.
Contingency, Hedge, and Synthetic
Option Orders
Contingency Orders, Hedge Orders,
and Synthetic Option Orders, as defined
in Exchange Rule 1066, are not
considered in the determination of the
opening price, and do not participate in
the opening trade because such order
types generally include two or more
option components, and may also
include a stock component.
Floor-Brokered Orders
To be considered in the determination
of the opening price and to participate
in the opening trade, orders represented
by Floor Brokers must be entered onto
the book electronically.
Inbound Orders and Quotes Received
While the System Completes the
Opening Trade
Inbound orders and quotes will not be
included in the calculation of the
opening price for a brief period
established by the system (and thus not
within the discretion of any Phlx XL
participant) while the system is in the
process of completing the opening trade.
During such brief period, such inbound
orders and quotes will be entered into
the Phlx XL system in order of their
arrival.
Proposed Rule 1017(d) would provide
that, as the opening price is determined
by series, the system will disseminate
through OPRA the opening trade price,
if any, and then the quote after the
PO 00000
Frm 00078
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
series is open. The system will process
and open the series for a given option
in random order. If there are no orders
in a particular series when the
underlying security opens, the Exchange
will disseminate quotations at the best
bid and offer in such series submitted
by Phlx XL participants assigned in the
particular option.
Situations in Which the Option Series
Will Not Open
The proposed rule would set forth
three conditions under which the
system will not open a series. First, the
system will not open a series when
there is no quote from the specialist or
a 100% participant. Second, the system
will not open a series when the opening
price is not within an acceptable range
(as determined by the Options
Committee and announced to Exchange
members and member organizations by
way of Exchange Circular) compared to
the highest offer and the lowest bid (e.g.,
the upper boundary of the acceptable
range may be 125% of the highest quote
offer and the lower boundary may be
75% of the lowest quote bid). Third, the
system will not open a series when the
opening trade would leave a market
order imbalance (i.e., there are more
market orders to buy or to sell for the
particular series than can be satisfied by
the limit orders, market orders and
quotes on the other side of the market).
No Specialist or 100% Participant
Quote or Quote Outside Acceptable
Range
If the specialist or a Phlx XL
participant with a 100% quoting
requirement is not quoting as described
in proposed Phlx Rule 1017(e)(i), or if
the opening price is not within an
acceptable range as described in
proposed Phlx Rule 1017(e)(ii),
proposed Phlx Rule 1017(f) would
provide that two Floor Officials may
authorize the manual opening of the
affected series where necessary to
ensure a fair and orderly market. In such
a circumstance, the Exchange’s existing
rules concerning manual openings
would apply.13
Manual Opening by Specialist
Proposed Phlx Rule 1017(g)(i) would
provide that if a condition or the
absence of a required condition not
otherwise covered by the proposed rule
would prevent an opening trade to
occur, the specialist may, with prior
notification to Market Surveillance staff,
determine to open a series manually in
13 See, e.g., the Commentary to Phlx Rule 1017,
Phlx Rules 1047, 1047A, and OFPAs A–12, A–14
and G–2.
E:\FR\FM\01NON1.SGM
01NON1
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 210 / Tuesday, November 1, 2005 / Notices
the interest of a fair and orderly market,
subject to the approval of two Floor
Officials within five minutes of the
opening of the affected series. Manual
openings would be required to be
conducted in accordance with current
Commentary .01–.03 of Exchange Rule
1017.
Index Options
Under the proposal, with respect to
automated openings in an Industry or
Market Index conducted pursuant to
Phlx Rule 1017, the specialist may
engage the automated opening system to
open such options when underlying
securities representing 50% of the
current index value of all the securities
underlying the index have opened for
trading on the primary market. The
system will automatically open all
index options when underlying
securities representing 100% of the
current index value of all the securities
underlying the index have opened for
trading on the primary market.14
Reopening Following a Trading Halt
The procedure described in the
proposed Rule may be used to reopen an
option after a trading halt.
Conforming Amendments to Current
Exchange Rules and OFPAs
In addition to the proposed
amendments to Exchange Rule 1017, the
Exchange is proposing various
conforming amendments to current
Exchange rules and OFPAs that relate to
openings and re-openings following a
trading halt, as well as deleting
references to obsolete procedures and
modifying certain processes.
The Exchange proposes to delete
Commentary .03(d)(iii) from Exchange
Rule 1017, which currently states that
the specialist will not open a series
when there is a market on opening order
with no corresponding order. The
Exchange currently does not accept
market on opening orders and thus
Commentary .03(d)(iii) is unnecessary.
The Exchange proposes to amend
Exchange Rules 1047 and 1047A and
OFPAs A–12 and G–2 to reflect an
automated opening conducted pursuant
to Exchange Rule 1017 shall be
considered a ‘‘trading rotation’’ for
purposes of these rules and OFPAs.
These rules would also be amended to
include the term ‘‘Market Surveillance
officer’’ to conform to current Exchange
staff structure.
14 The Exchange proposes to amend Phlx Rule
1047A and OFPA G–2 to require the opening of an
Industry Index when 100% of the current index
value of all the securities underlying the index have
opened for trading on the primary market.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:39 Oct 31, 2005
Jkt 208001
Exchange Rule 1047(c) would be
amended to reflect that two Floor
Officials (with the concurrence of a
Market Surveillance officer) and not the
appropriate Floor Standing Committee
as reflected in the current rule would
have the authority, respecting a
particular class or series of option, to
delay the opening, to halt and reopen
after a halt, and to open where the
underlying stock or ETF has not opened.
Exchange Rule 1047 would be further
amended to delete all references to the
Series Opening Request Ticket
(‘‘SORT’’) Procedure, an obsolete
procedure that is no longer in use on the
Exchange. The Exchange proposes a
similar amendment to OFPA A–12
Opening Rotations and SORT
Procedures.
Commentary .02 to Exchange Rule
1047 would be amended to require the
specialist to inform the Market
Surveillance staff in the event that
trading in an underlying stock or
Exchange-Traded Fund Share has not
opened in the primary market for such
stock or Exchange-Traded Fund Share
within a reasonable time after the
opening of business, or, in the event that
current quotations for any underlying
foreign currency are for any reason
unavailable. Market Surveillance staff
would then take the appropriate steps to
determine the cause of such delay or
unavailability, rather than the chairman
of the appropriate Floor Standing
Committee or his delegate on the floor,
as the rule currently provides.
For consistency, OFPA A–12 would
be amended to establish that the
acceptable range within which the
opening price must be established,
would apply to both automated
openings and manual openings
conducted pursuant to Exchange Rule
1017 and the Commentary thereto. A
similar amendment is proposed
respecting OFPA A–14, Equity Option
and Index Option Opening Parameters.
The Exchange also proposes to delete
references to Super Cap Index options
from OFPA G–2, because the Exchange
no longer lists this product.
Deployment of the Automated Opening
System
The Exchange represents that it would
deploy the automated opening system
on an issue-by-issue basis. According to
the Exchange, at least 10 issues would
be deployed on the system within four
weeks from the date of Commission
approval of the proposed rule change,
and all options traded on the Exchange
would be deployed on the system
within twelve weeks of such approval.
PO 00000
Frm 00079
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
65955
III. Discussion
After careful consideration, the
Commission finds that the proposed
rule change, as amended, is consistent
with the requirements of the Act and the
rules and regulations thereunder
applicable to a national securities
exchange and, in particular, the
requirements of section 6 of the Act.15
Specifically, the Commission finds that
the proposal is consistent with section
6(b)(5) of the Act,16 which requires, in
part, that the rules of an exchange be
designed to promote just and equitable
principles of trade, to remove
impediments to and perfect the
mechanism of a free and open market
and a national market system, and, in
general, to protect investors and the
public interest.17
The Commission believes that the
proposed automated opening system
may facilitate an expedited opening of
options on Phlx and thereby improve
market efficiency for all market
participants. Moreover, the Commission
believes that the proposed rules should
provide transparency to all market
participants with respect to the manner
in which an opening price is
determined on the Exchange and ensure
that the opening is conducted in a fair
and orderly fashion.
The Commission also believes that the
Exchange’s proposal to allow two Floor
Officials with the concurrence of a
Market Surveillance Officer, rather than
the appropriate Floor Standing
Committee, to, among other things,
delay the opening, halt and reopen after
a halt, and open where the underlying
stock or ETF has not opened, may
facilitate the decision making process.
Furthermore, the Commission notes that
this approval structure is substantially
similar to an existing rule of the
American Stock Exchange LLC.18
IV. Conclusion
It is therefore ordered, pursuant to
section 19(b)(2) of the Act,19 that the
proposed rule change (SR–Phlx–2005–
25), as amended, is approved.
15 15
U.S.C. 78f.
U.S.C. 78f(b)(5).
17 In approving this proposal, the Commission has
considered the proposed rule’s impact on
efficiency, competition, and capital formation. 15
U.S.C. 78c(f).
18 See Amex Rule 918(c).
19 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(2).
16 15
E:\FR\FM\01NON1.SGM
01NON1
65956
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 210 / Tuesday, November 1, 2005 / Notices
For the Commission, by the Division of
Market Regulation, pursuant to delegated
authority.20
Jonathan G. Katz,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. E5–6027 Filed 10–31–05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8010–01–P
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
COMMISSION
[Release No. 34–52651; File No. SR–SCCP–
2004–03]
Self-Regulatory Organizations; Stock
Clearing Corporation of Philadelphia;
Order Granting Approval of a
Proposed Rule Change Relating to
Anonymous Features on Trading
Systems
October 21, 2005.
I. Introduction
On August 5, 2004, the Stock Clearing
Corporation of Philadelphia (‘‘SCCP’’)
filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission (‘‘Commission’’) proposed
rule change SR–SCCP–2004–03
pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(‘‘Act’’).1 On September 7, 2004, SCCP
amended the proposed rule change.
Notice of the proposal was published in
the Federal Register on August 10,
2005.2 No comment letters were
received. For the reasons discussed
below, the Commission is granting
approval of the proposed rule change
with the conditions set forth below.
II. Description
The rule change allows SCCP to
process trades executed on a trading
system that provides for anonymous
trading.3 Pursuant to the rule change,
SCCP will be able in the future to
receive locked-in trade data from a
trading system that provides anonymity.
In such a situation, SCCP would report
such trades to its members using an
anonymous acronym instead of naming
or identifying the actual contraside.
In the event that SCCP ceases to act
for a member involved in anonymous
trading, the operator of the trading
system shall have the responsibility to
identify to its users the trades, which
20 17
CFR 200.30–3(a)(12).
U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
2 Securities Exchange Act Release No. 52201
(August 3, 2005), 70 FR 46565.
3 SCCP’s rule change is similar to a rule change
approved by the Commission in 2003 that allowed
the National Securities Clearing Corporation
(‘‘NSCC’’) to accommodate the reporting of trades
executed on a system that provides trading
anonymity. Securities Exchange Act Release No.
48526 (September 23, 2003), 68 FR 56367
(September 30, 2003) [File No. SR–NSCC–2003–14].
1 15
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:39 Oct 31, 2005
Jkt 208001
are generally included in reports
produced by SCCP, involving the
affected member. SCCP would forward
to the operator of the trading system the
appropriate information to facilitate its
notification of its users. In addition,
should SCCP receive information from
NSCC that NSCC had ceased to act for
an NSCC member that was an
unidentified contraside of any such
trade, SCCP would also forward this
information to the operator of the
trading system.4
proposed rule change (File No. SR–
SCCP–2004–03) be and hereby is
approved.
III. Discussion
Section 17A(b)(3)(F) of the Act
provides that the rules of a clearing
agency should be designed to promote
the prompt and accurate clearance and
settlement of securities transactions.5 To
benefit from the advantages of an
anonymous trading system, parties to
anonymous trades need to keep their
identities anonymous in any reports
provided to counterparties as part of the
clearance and settlement of the trades.
By allowing SCCP to use an acronym in
place of the name or identity of
contrasides of anonymous trades in the
trade reports it provides to its members,
the proposed rule change allows the
parties to anonymous trades to preserve
their anonymity and thus to preserve
the benefits associated with executing
anonymous trades. Accordingly, the
proposed rule change is designed to
promote the prompt and accurate
clearance and settlement of securities
transactions conducted on anonymous
trading systems by allowing such trades
to be cleared and settled through SCCP
and therefore receive the benefits and
efficiencies SCCP offers as a registered
clearing agency.
As a condition of this approval, SCCP
will notify the Commission in writing
before it begins processing trades
executed on each anonymous trading
system. Such notification shall include
such information as the name of the
anonymous trading system, the operator
and/or owner of the anonymous trading
system, the proposed processing start
date, and any other relevant information
requested by the Commission.
[Disaster Declaration #10180 and #10181]
IV. Conclusion
On the basis of the foregoing, the
Commission finds that the proposed
rule change is consistent with the
requirements of the Act and in
particular Section 17A of the Act and
the rules and regulations thereunder.
It is therefore ordered, pursuant to
Section 19(b)(2) of the Act, that the
4 NSCC’s anonymous trading procedure includes
similar notification requirements.
5 15 U.S.C. 78q–1(a)(A)(B).
PO 00000
Frm 00080
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
For the Commission by the Division of
Market Regulation, pursuant to delegated
authority.6
Jonathan G. Katz,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. E5–6016 Filed 10–31–05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8010–01–P
SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION
Alabama Disaster Number AL–00003
Small Business Administration.
Amendment 4.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
SUMMARY: This is an amendment of the
Presidential declaration of a major
disaster for the State of Alabama
(FEMA–1605–DR), dated 08/29/2005.
Incident: Hurricane Katrina.
Incident Period: 08/29/2005 through
09/26/2005.
Effective Date: 10/20/2005.
Physical Loan Application Deadline
Date: 01/11/2006.
EIDL Loan Application Deadline Date:
05/29/2006.
ADDRESSES: Submit completed loan
applications to: Small Business
Administration, National Processing
and Disbursement Center, 14925
Kingsport Road, Fort Worth, TX 76155.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: A.
Escobar, Office of Disaster Assistance,
U.S. Small Business Administration,
409 3rd Street, Suite 6050, Washington,
DC 20416.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The notice
of the President’s major disaster
declaration for the State of Alabama,
dated 08/29/2005, is hereby amended to
extend the deadline for filing
applications for physical damages as a
result of this disaster to 01/11/2006.
All other information in the original
declaration remains unchanged.
(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance
Numbers 59002 and 59008)
Herbert L. Mitchell,
Associate Administrator for Disaster
Assistance.
[FR Doc. 05–21678 Filed 10–31–05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8025–01–P
SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION
[Disaster Declaration #10176 and #10177]
Louisiana Disaster Number LA–00002
AGENCY:
6 17
E:\FR\FM\01NON1.SGM
Small Business Administration.
CFR 200.30–3(a)(12).
01NON1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 210 (Tuesday, November 1, 2005)]
[Notices]
[Pages 65953-65956]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E5-6027]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
[Release No. 34-52667; File No. SR-Phlx-2005-25]
Self-Regulatory Organizations; Philadelphia Stock Exchange, Inc.;
Order Granting Approval to a Proposed Rule Change and Amendments No. 2,
3, and 5 Thereto Relating to the Adoption of New Rules That Would
Establish an Automated Opening System on the Exchange
October 25, 2005.
I. Introduction
On April 21, 2005, the Philadelphia Stock Exchange, Inc. (``Phlx''
or ``Exchange'') filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
(``Commission'') pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 (``Act'') \1\, and Rule 19b-4 \2\ thereunder, a
proposed rule change that would establish an automated opening system
on the Exchange. The Exchange submitted Amendments No. 1,\3\ 2,\4\ and
3 \5\ to its proposal on June 1, 2005, September 1, 2005, and September
14, 2005, respectively. The proposed rule change, as amended, was
published for comment in the Federal Register on September 22, 2005.\6\
No comments were received on the proposal. The Phlx submitted Amendment
No. 4 \7\ on September 23, 2005, and Amendment No. 5 \8\ on September
26, 2005. This order approves the proposed rule change, as amended.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
\2\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
\3\ See Form 19b-4, dated June 1, 2005 (``Amendment No. 1'').
Amendment No. 1 replaced the original filing in its entirety.
\4\ See Form 19b-4, dated September 1, 2005 (``Amendment No.
2''). Amendment No. 2 replaced Amendment No. 1 in its entirety.
\5\ See Form 19b-4, dated September 14, 2005 (``Amendment No.
3''). In Amendment No. 3, Phlx, in part, deleted proposed rule text
to clarify that during a manual opening all market orders are to be
executed at one price.
\6\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 52448 (September 15,
2005), 70 FR 55650.
\7\ See Form 19b-4, dated September 23, 2005. The Exchange
subsequently submitted Amendment No. 5, which was intended to
supercede and replace Amendment No. 4. As a result, the Exchange
withdrew Amendment No. 4 on October 19, 2005. See Form 19b-4, dated
October 19, 2005.
\8\ See Form 19b-4, dated September 26, 2005. In Amendment No.
5, the Exchange made technical changes to accurately reflect the
differences between proposed rule language and current rule text, as
well as made technical changes to better conform Exhibits 4 and 5 to
each other. The Act does not require notice and comment for
technical amendments.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
II. Description of the Proposed Rule Change
In July 2004, the Exchange began trading options on its new
electronic options trading platform, Phlx XL.\9\ Because Phlx XL does
not currently include an automated opening functionality, specialists
are currently required to open option series manually. The proposed
rule change would establish a fully automated opening system for
options traded on Phlx XL as part of the Phlx XL system.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\9\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 50100 (July 27,
2004), 69 FR 44612 (August 3, 2004) (SR-Phlx-2003-59).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Pre-Opening
For a period of time before the scheduled opening in the underlying
security (and not less than one hour as determined by the Options
Committee with notice to the membership via Exchange circular), Phlx XL
will accept orders and quotes during the ``Pre-Opening Phase.'' The
Phlx XL system will disseminate to specialists, Streaming Quote Traders
(``SQTs''), Remote Streaming Quote Traders (``RSQTs''), and non-SQT
ROTs who are required to submit continuous two-sided electronic
quotations pursuant to Exchange Rule 1014(b)(ii)(E) \10\ (collectively,
for purposes of proposed Phlx Rule 1017, ``Phlx XL participants'')
information about resting orders on the book that remain from the
previous trading session and orders submitted prior to the opening.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\10\ Exchange Rule 1014(b)(ii)(E) requires non-SQT ROTs who
transact more than 20% of their contract volume in an option
electronically versus in open outcry during a particular calendar
quarter to submit proprietary electronic quotations in such an
option during the subsequent calendar quarter for a certain number
of series in such option, depending on the percent of total volume
transacted electronically versus in open outcry on the Exchange in
such option.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Calculation of Opening Price
The system will calculate an Anticipated Opening Price (``AOP'')
and Anticipated Opening Size (``AOS'') when a quote or trade has been
disseminated by the primary market for the underlying security, under
the conditions set forth below. The specialist assigned in the
particular option must enter opening quotes not later than one minute
following the dissemination of a quote or trade by the primary market
for the underlying security.
An AOP may be calculated only if: (i) The Exchange has received
market orders, or the book is crossed (highest bid is higher than the
lowest offer) or locked (highest bid equals the lowest offer); and (ii)
either (A) the specialist's
[[Page 65954]]
quote has been submitted; (B) the quotes of at least two Phlx XL
participants that are required to submit continuous, two-sided quotes
in 100% of the series in all option issues in which such Phlx XL
participant is assigned (``100% participants''),\11\ have been
submitted within two minutes of the opening trade or quote on the
primary market for the underlying security (or such shorter time as
determined by the Options Committee and disseminated to the membership
via Exchange Circular); or (C) if neither the specialist's quote \12\
nor the quotes of two 100% participants have been submitted within two
minutes of the opening trade or quote on the primary market for the
underlying security (or such shorter time as determined by the Options
Committee and disseminated to the membership via Exchange Circular),
one 100% participant has submitted its quote.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\11\ An example of a 100% participant is a new category of ROT
on the Exchange known as a ``Directed SQT'' or a ``Directed RSQT,''
defined as an SQT or RSQT that receives a Directed Order. See
Securities Exchange Act Release No. 51759 (May 27, 2005), 70 FR
32860 (June 6, 2005) (SR-Phlx-2004-91).
\12\ For example, a specialist may not submit a quote due to
systems malfunctions. A specialist, however, who fails to submit
opening quotes within one minute of the opening on the primary
market would be subject to possible disciplinary action.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Opening Order/Quote Imbalance
In situations where an AOP may be calculated (i.e., when the
conditions described above are present) and there is an order/quote
imbalance, the system will immediately send an imbalance notice
indicating the imbalance side (buy or sell) and the AOP and AOS (an
``Imbalance Notice'') to Phlx XL participants assigned to the options
class provided that the primary market for the underlying security has
disseminated an opening quote or trade. Phlx XL participants may then
submit their opening or revised opening quotes. Thereafter the system
will disseminate an updated Imbalance Notice every five seconds (or
such shorter period as determined by the Options Committee and
disseminated to membership via Exchange Circular) until the series is
open. If no imbalance exists, no Imbalance Notice will be sent, and the
system will establish an opening price as described below.
Actual Opening Price
The proposal would establish the opening price of a series in
situations where there is no opening quote/order imbalance. Proposed
Phlx Rule 1017(c)(i) would define the opening price as the price at
which the maximum quantity of contracts would be traded. The proposed
rule would establish a series of ``tie-breakers'' that the system would
follow in establishing the opening price when two or more prices would
satisfy the maximum quantity criteria. Specifically, when the maximum
quantity of contracts could be traded at two or more prices, the system
would establish the opening price based on the following criteria, in
order: (1) The price at which the greatest number of customer orders
would be traded; (2) the price at which the maximum number of Phlx XL
participants would trade; and (3) the price that is closest to the
closing price from the previous trading session.
Priority on Openings
The system will give priority to market orders first (including a
limit order to buy which is at a higher price than the price at which
the option is to be opened and a limit order to sell which is at a
lower price than the price at which the option is to be opened, which
will be treated as market orders), then to resting limit orders at the
opening price.
Contingency, Hedge, and Synthetic Option Orders
Contingency Orders, Hedge Orders, and Synthetic Option Orders, as
defined in Exchange Rule 1066, are not considered in the determination
of the opening price, and do not participate in the opening trade
because such order types generally include two or more option
components, and may also include a stock component.
Floor-Brokered Orders
To be considered in the determination of the opening price and to
participate in the opening trade, orders represented by Floor Brokers
must be entered onto the book electronically.
Inbound Orders and Quotes Received While the System Completes the
Opening Trade
Inbound orders and quotes will not be included in the calculation
of the opening price for a brief period established by the system (and
thus not within the discretion of any Phlx XL participant) while the
system is in the process of completing the opening trade. During such
brief period, such inbound orders and quotes will be entered into the
Phlx XL system in order of their arrival.
Proposed Rule 1017(d) would provide that, as the opening price is
determined by series, the system will disseminate through OPRA the
opening trade price, if any, and then the quote after the series is
open. The system will process and open the series for a given option in
random order. If there are no orders in a particular series when the
underlying security opens, the Exchange will disseminate quotations at
the best bid and offer in such series submitted by Phlx XL participants
assigned in the particular option.
Situations in Which the Option Series Will Not Open
The proposed rule would set forth three conditions under which the
system will not open a series. First, the system will not open a series
when there is no quote from the specialist or a 100% participant.
Second, the system will not open a series when the opening price is not
within an acceptable range (as determined by the Options Committee and
announced to Exchange members and member organizations by way of
Exchange Circular) compared to the highest offer and the lowest bid
(e.g., the upper boundary of the acceptable range may be 125% of the
highest quote offer and the lower boundary may be 75% of the lowest
quote bid). Third, the system will not open a series when the opening
trade would leave a market order imbalance (i.e., there are more market
orders to buy or to sell for the particular series than can be
satisfied by the limit orders, market orders and quotes on the other
side of the market).
No Specialist or 100% Participant Quote or Quote Outside Acceptable
Range
If the specialist or a Phlx XL participant with a 100% quoting
requirement is not quoting as described in proposed Phlx Rule
1017(e)(i), or if the opening price is not within an acceptable range
as described in proposed Phlx Rule 1017(e)(ii), proposed Phlx Rule
1017(f) would provide that two Floor Officials may authorize the manual
opening of the affected series where necessary to ensure a fair and
orderly market. In such a circumstance, the Exchange's existing rules
concerning manual openings would apply.\13\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\13\ See, e.g., the Commentary to Phlx Rule 1017, Phlx Rules
1047, 1047A, and OFPAs A-12, A-14 and G-2.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Manual Opening by Specialist
Proposed Phlx Rule 1017(g)(i) would provide that if a condition or
the absence of a required condition not otherwise covered by the
proposed rule would prevent an opening trade to occur, the specialist
may, with prior notification to Market Surveillance staff, determine to
open a series manually in
[[Page 65955]]
the interest of a fair and orderly market, subject to the approval of
two Floor Officials within five minutes of the opening of the affected
series. Manual openings would be required to be conducted in accordance
with current Commentary .01-.03 of Exchange Rule 1017.
Index Options
Under the proposal, with respect to automated openings in an
Industry or Market Index conducted pursuant to Phlx Rule 1017, the
specialist may engage the automated opening system to open such options
when underlying securities representing 50% of the current index value
of all the securities underlying the index have opened for trading on
the primary market. The system will automatically open all index
options when underlying securities representing 100% of the current
index value of all the securities underlying the index have opened for
trading on the primary market.\14\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\14\ The Exchange proposes to amend Phlx Rule 1047A and OFPA G-2
to require the opening of an Industry Index when 100% of the current
index value of all the securities underlying the index have opened
for trading on the primary market.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Reopening Following a Trading Halt
The procedure described in the proposed Rule may be used to reopen
an option after a trading halt.
Conforming Amendments to Current Exchange Rules and OFPAs
In addition to the proposed amendments to Exchange Rule 1017, the
Exchange is proposing various conforming amendments to current Exchange
rules and OFPAs that relate to openings and re-openings following a
trading halt, as well as deleting references to obsolete procedures and
modifying certain processes.
The Exchange proposes to delete Commentary .03(d)(iii) from
Exchange Rule 1017, which currently states that the specialist will not
open a series when there is a market on opening order with no
corresponding order. The Exchange currently does not accept market on
opening orders and thus Commentary .03(d)(iii) is unnecessary.
The Exchange proposes to amend Exchange Rules 1047 and 1047A and
OFPAs A-12 and G-2 to reflect an automated opening conducted pursuant
to Exchange Rule 1017 shall be considered a ``trading rotation'' for
purposes of these rules and OFPAs. These rules would also be amended to
include the term ``Market Surveillance officer'' to conform to current
Exchange staff structure.
Exchange Rule 1047(c) would be amended to reflect that two Floor
Officials (with the concurrence of a Market Surveillance officer) and
not the appropriate Floor Standing Committee as reflected in the
current rule would have the authority, respecting a particular class or
series of option, to delay the opening, to halt and reopen after a
halt, and to open where the underlying stock or ETF has not opened.
Exchange Rule 1047 would be further amended to delete all
references to the Series Opening Request Ticket (``SORT'') Procedure,
an obsolete procedure that is no longer in use on the Exchange. The
Exchange proposes a similar amendment to OFPA A-12 Opening Rotations
and SORT Procedures.
Commentary .02 to Exchange Rule 1047 would be amended to require
the specialist to inform the Market Surveillance staff in the event
that trading in an underlying stock or Exchange-Traded Fund Share has
not opened in the primary market for such stock or Exchange-Traded Fund
Share within a reasonable time after the opening of business, or, in
the event that current quotations for any underlying foreign currency
are for any reason unavailable. Market Surveillance staff would then
take the appropriate steps to determine the cause of such delay or
unavailability, rather than the chairman of the appropriate Floor
Standing Committee or his delegate on the floor, as the rule currently
provides.
For consistency, OFPA A-12 would be amended to establish that the
acceptable range within which the opening price must be established,
would apply to both automated openings and manual openings conducted
pursuant to Exchange Rule 1017 and the Commentary thereto. A similar
amendment is proposed respecting OFPA A-14, Equity Option and Index
Option Opening Parameters. The Exchange also proposes to delete
references to Super Cap Index options from OFPA G-2, because the
Exchange no longer lists this product.
Deployment of the Automated Opening System
The Exchange represents that it would deploy the automated opening
system on an issue-by-issue basis. According to the Exchange, at least
10 issues would be deployed on the system within four weeks from the
date of Commission approval of the proposed rule change, and all
options traded on the Exchange would be deployed on the system within
twelve weeks of such approval.
III. Discussion
After careful consideration, the Commission finds that the proposed
rule change, as amended, is consistent with the requirements of the Act
and the rules and regulations thereunder applicable to a national
securities exchange and, in particular, the requirements of section 6
of the Act.\15\ Specifically, the Commission finds that the proposal is
consistent with section 6(b)(5) of the Act,\16\ which requires, in
part, that the rules of an exchange be designed to promote just and
equitable principles of trade, to remove impediments to and perfect the
mechanism of a free and open market and a national market system, and,
in general, to protect investors and the public interest.\17\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\15\ 15 U.S.C. 78f.
\16\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(5).
\17\ In approving this proposal, the Commission has considered
the proposed rule's impact on efficiency, competition, and capital
formation. 15 U.S.C. 78c(f).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Commission believes that the proposed automated opening system
may facilitate an expedited opening of options on Phlx and thereby
improve market efficiency for all market participants. Moreover, the
Commission believes that the proposed rules should provide transparency
to all market participants with respect to the manner in which an
opening price is determined on the Exchange and ensure that the opening
is conducted in a fair and orderly fashion.
The Commission also believes that the Exchange's proposal to allow
two Floor Officials with the concurrence of a Market Surveillance
Officer, rather than the appropriate Floor Standing Committee, to,
among other things, delay the opening, halt and reopen after a halt,
and open where the underlying stock or ETF has not opened, may
facilitate the decision making process. Furthermore, the Commission
notes that this approval structure is substantially similar to an
existing rule of the American Stock Exchange LLC.\18\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\18\ See Amex Rule 918(c).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
IV. Conclusion
It is therefore ordered, pursuant to section 19(b)(2) of the
Act,\19\ that the proposed rule change (SR-Phlx-2005-25), as amended,
is approved.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\19\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(2).
[[Page 65956]]
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
For the Commission, by the Division of Market Regulation,
pursuant to delegated authority.\20\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\20\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Jonathan G. Katz,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. E5-6027 Filed 10-31-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8010-01-P