Self-Regulatory Organizations; Chicago Stock Exchange, Inc.; Order Approving Proposed Rule Change To Amend Article XX, Rule 37(a)(3) To Eliminate its Requirement That Specialists Guarantee Execution of Limit Orders When Certain Conditions Occur in Another Market, 62151-62152 [E5-5972]
Download as PDF
<![CDATA[
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 208 / Friday, October 28, 2005 / Notices
rule change without delay and thereby
provide an incentive to parties on the
Exchange to quote more aggressively as
soon as possible. For these reasons, the
Commission designates the proposal to
be effective and operative upon filing
with the Commission.15
At any time within 60 days of the
filing of such proposed rule change, the
Commission may summarily abrogate
such rule change if it appears to the
Commission that such action is
necessary or appropriate in the public
interest, for the protection of investors
or otherwise in furtherance of the
purposes of the Act.16
IV. Solicitation of Comments
Interested persons are invited to
submit written data, views, and
arguments concerning the foregoing,
including whether the proposed rule
change is consistent with the Act.
Comments may be submitted by any of
the following methods:
Electronic Comments
• Use the Commission’s Internet
comment form (https://www.sec.gov/
rules/sro.shtml); or
• Send an e-mail to rulecomments@sec.gov. Please include File
Number SR–CBOE–2005–85 on the
subject line.
Paper Comments
• Send paper comments in triplicate
to Jonathan G. Katz, Secretary,
Securities and Exchange Commission,
100 F Street, NE., Washington, DC
20549–0609.
All submissions should refer to File
Number SR–CBOE–2005–85. This file
number should be included on the
subject line if e-mail is used. To help the
Commission process and review your
comments more efficiently, please use
only one method. The Commission will
post all comments on the Commission’s
Internet Web site (https://www.sec.gov/
rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the
submission, all subsequent
amendments, all written statements
with respect to the proposed rule
change that are filed with the
Commission, and all written
communications relating to the
proposed rule change between the
Commission and any person, other than
those that may be withheld from the
public in accordance with the
provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be
15 For purposes only of accelerating the operative
date of this proposal, the Commission has
considered the proposed rule’s impact on
efficiency, competition, and capital formation. 15
U.S.C. 78c(f).
16 See Section 19(b)(3)(C) of the Act, 15 U.S.C.
78s(b)(3)(C).
VerDate Aug<31>2005
18:15 Oct 27, 2005
Jkt 208001
available for inspection and copying in
the Commission’s Public Reference
Room. Copies of the filing also will be
available for inspection and copying at
the principal office of the CBOE. All
comments received will be posted
without change; the Commission does
not edit personal identifying
information from submissions. You
should submit only information that
you wish to make available publicly. All
submissions should refer to File
Number SR–CBOE–2005–85 and should
be submitted on or before November 18,
2005.
For the Commission, by the Division of
Market Regulation, pursuant to delegated
authority.17
Jonathan G. Katz,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. E5–5980 Filed 10–27–05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8010–01–P
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
COMMISSION
[Release No. 52652; File No. SR–CHX–2004–
17]
Self-Regulatory Organizations;
Chicago Stock Exchange, Inc.; Order
Approving Proposed Rule Change To
Amend Article XX, Rule 37(a)(3) To
Eliminate its Requirement That
Specialists Guarantee Execution of
Limit Orders When Certain Conditions
Occur in Another Market
October 21, 2005.
I. Introduction
On June 21, 2004, the Chicago Stock
Exchange, Inc. (‘‘CHX’’ or ‘‘Exchange’’)
filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission (‘‘Commission’’), pursuant
to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 (‘‘Act’’) 1 and Rule
19b-4 thereunder,2 a proposed rule
change to amend Article XX, Rule
37(a)(3) of its rules to permit, rather
than require, CHX specialists to
guarantee execution of limit orders
when certain conditions occur in
another market. On July 5, 2005, the
CHX filed Amendment No. 1 to the
proposed rule change.3 The proposed
rule change, as amended, was published
for comment in the Federal Register on
July 14, 2005.4 The Commission
received no comments on the proposal.
17 17
CFR 200.30–3(a)(12).
U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
2 17 CFR 240.19b–4.
3 See Amendment No. 1.
4 See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 51997
(July 8, 2005), 70 FR 40760.
1 15
PO 00000
Frm 00062
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
62151
This order approves the proposed rule
change, as amended.
II. Description of the Proposal
The Exchange proposes to amend
Article XX, Rule 37(a)(3), which
provides for execution of resting limit
orders based on activity in other
markets, to eliminate the requirement
that CHX specialists guarantee
execution of such limit orders when
certain conditions occur in another
market. For listed issues, the current
rule generally obligates a CHX specialist
to guarantee execution of limit orders
resting in the specialist’s book when the
issue is being traded in the primary
market at a price equal to or better than
the limit price. [For Nasdaq securities,
the rule permits, but does not require,
a CHX specialist to guarantee execution
of limit orders resting in the specialist’s
book, when another market center’s
quotation locks or crosses the limit
price.] The CHX represents that the
guarantees set forth in Article XX, Rule
37(a)(3), commonly referred to as ‘‘limit
order protection’’ or ‘‘primary market
protection,’’ were voluntarily adopted
by the Exchange over 15 years ago to
attract order flow.
Under the proposed revision to
Article XX, Rule 37(a)(3), the mandate
that CHX specialists guarantee
execution of resting limit orders for
listed issues, based on triggering activity
in other markets, would be deleted.
Instead, the amended rule would permit
CHX specialists to continue to provide
such limit order protection guarantees
solely on an issue-by-issue basis, on
non-discriminatory terms approved by
the Exchange. The Exchange’s existing
functionality providing for automated
execution of resting limit orders would
remain available for CHX specialists
who elect to continue to guarantee limit
order protection.5
The CHX provided the following
rationale for the proposed rule change.
First, as the industry has evolved, the
Exchange’s principal competitors for
order flow, namely ‘‘third market’’
execution venues and alternative
trading systems, do not provide
comparable limit order protection
guarantees. In addition, CHX ordersending firms now have free access to
comprehensive monthly order execution
5 The CHX anticipates that for the foreseeable
future, CHX specialists would continue to provide
limit order protection voluntarily using the criteria
for limit order protection previously set forth in
Article XX, Rule 37(a)(3). Should the CHX receive
a request from a specialist to alter the voluntary
limit order protection criteria and agree to alter the
functionality, the Exchange will notify all CHX
participants of the change. The Commission
believes any such change would need to be filed
pursuant to Section 19(b) of the Act.
E:\FR\FM\28OCN1.SGM
28OCN1
62152
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 208 / Friday, October 28, 2005 / Notices
quality statistics; thus, the CHX believes
that ‘‘front-end’’ execution guarantees
are no longer necessary to attract order
flow. Accordingly, the Exchange
believes that the guarantee no longer
serves a clear competitive purpose.
Secondly, since the securities industry
converted to decimal trading, the
availability of liquidity at a best bid or
offer price has declined, making it
difficult for the CHX specialist, who
chooses to offset his positions in
another market, to access liquidity at the
price the rule requires him to provide.
Consequently, the Exchange believes it
is no longer appropriate to mandate that
specialists guarantee execution of
resting limit orders for listed issues
based on activity in other market
centers.
III. Discussion
The Commission finds that the
proposed rule change is consistent with
the requirements of the Act and the
rules and regulations thereunder
applicable to a national securities
exchange 6 and, in particular, the
requirements of Section 6(b)(5) of the
Act 7 because it is designed to promote
just and equitable principles of trade, to
remove impediments to and perfect the
mechanism of a free and open market
and a national market system, and, in
general, to protect investors and the
public interest. The Commission agrees
that the environment has changed
significantly since the Exchange
voluntarily enacted its rule-based
execution guarantees, and that
consequently, the guarantees may no
longer serve to foster competition
between the markets.
However, the Commission
emphasizes that the deletion of the rulebased mandate regarding limit order
protection does not in any way affect a
CHX specialist’s obligation to provide
best execution, nor would it modify any
other specialist obligations set forth in
Article XXX of the CHX Rules. The
Exchange must continue its surveillance
of order executions to ensure that CHX
specialists meet all of their obligations
to each order. The Commission further
emphasizes that, to the extent limit
order protection guarantees are
provided on a voluntary, issue-by-issue
basis, such guarantees would have to be
provided on a non-discriminatory basis.
6 In approving this proposed rule change, as
amended, the Commission has considered the
proposed rule’s impact on efficiency, competition,
and capital formation. 15 U.S.C. 78c(f).
7 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(5).
VerDate Aug<31>2005
18:15 Oct 27, 2005
Jkt 208001
IV. Conclusion
It is therefore ordered, pursuant to
Section 19(b)(2) of the Act,8 that the
proposed rule change (SR–CHX–2004–
17), as amended, be, and it hereby is,
approved.
For the Commission, by the Division of
Market Regulation, pursuant to delegated
authority.9
Jonathan G. Katz,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. E5–5972 Filed 10–27–05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8010–01–P
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
COMMISSION
[Release No. 34–52647; File No. SR–CHX–
2005–01]
Self-Regulatory Organizations;
Chicago Stock Exchange, Inc.; Notice
of Filing of Proposed Rule Change and
Amendment Nos. 1 and 2 Thereto
Relating to the Exchange’s Order
Priority Rule and the Mandatory Use of
Order Match Functionalities
October 21, 2005.
Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(‘‘Act’’),1 and Rule 19b–4 thereunder,2
notice is hereby given that on February
3, 2005, the Chicago Stock Exchange,
Inc. (‘‘CHX’’ or ‘‘Exchange’’) filed with
the Securities and Exchange
Commission (‘‘Commission’’) the
proposed rule change as described in
Items I, II and III below, which Items
have been prepared by the Exchange.
On September 16, 2005, the Exchange
filed Amendment No. 1 to the proposed
rule change.3 On October 6, the
Exchange filed Amendment No. 2 to the
proposed rule change.4 The Commission
is publishing this notice to solicit
comments on the proposed rule change,
as amended, from interested persons.
I. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Terms of Substance of
the Proposed Rule Change
The Exchange proposes to amend
Exchange Article XXX, Rule 2,
Precedence to Orders in Book, to clarify
the requirements of the Exchange’s
priority rule and to require specialists to
8 15
U.S.C. 78s(b)(2).
CFR 200.30–3(a)(12).
1 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
2 17 CFR 240.19b–4.
3 See Form 19b–4 dated September 16, 2005
(‘‘Amendment No. 1). Amendment No. 1 replaced
the original filing in its entirety.
4 Amendment No. 2 was a partial amendment in
which the Exchange corrected errors in the
previously filed Exhibit 4. The Exhibit 4 included
in Amendment No. 2 replaced the previously filed
Exhibit 4 in its entirety.
9 17
PO 00000
Frm 00063
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
make use of Exchange-provided order
match functionalities. The text of the
proposed rule change is available on the
Exchange’s Web site (https://
www.chx.com/rules/
proposed_rules.htm), at the Exchange’s
Office of the Secretary, and at the
Commission’s Public Reference Room.
II. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule
Change
In its filing with the Commission, the
Exchange included statements
concerning the purpose of, and basis for,
the proposed rule change and discussed
any comments it received on the
proposed rule change. The text of these
statements may be examined at the
places specified in Item IV below. The
Exchange has prepared summaries, set
forth in Sections A, B, and C below, of
the most significant aspects of such
statements.
A. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule
Change
1. Purpose
The Exchange’s rules generally
require Exchange specialists to give
precedence to orders in their books for
the purchase or sale of securities over
orders that originate with the specialists
as dealers.5 Although specialists are not
required to yield precedence to
professional orders in certain
circumstances, specialists are not
permitted to trade ahead of customer
orders.6
The Exchange’s systems incorporate
several different order match
functionalities that are designed to
replace proposed specialist executions
on a principal basis with executions of
eligible customer orders in the
specialist’s book. These functionalities,
among other things, prevent a specialist
from manually executing an order on a
principal basis when there is a customer
5 See Exchange Article XXX, Rule 2, Precedence
to Orders in Book.
6 If a specialist accepts a professional order for the
book that the specialist is not required to accept
under the rules and policies of the Exchange, the
specialist is not required to yield precedence to that
order over the specialist’s principal interest if the
orders that originate from the specialist and its
customer are limit orders at the same price and the
specialist is displaying its interest through the
quotation system. See Exchange Article XXX, Rule
2. Under the Exchange’s rules, a ‘‘professional’’
order is an order for the account of a broker-dealer,
the account of an associated person of a brokerdealer, or any account in which a broker-dealer or
an associated person of a broker-dealer has any
direct or indirect interest. See Exchange Article
XXX, Rule 2, Interpretations and Policy .04.
E:\FR\FM\28OCN1.SGM
28OCN1
]]>Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 208 (Friday, October 28, 2005)]
[Notices]
[Pages 62151-62152]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E5-5972]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
[Release No. 52652; File No. SR-CHX-2004-17]
Self-Regulatory Organizations; Chicago Stock Exchange, Inc.;
Order Approving Proposed Rule Change To Amend Article XX, Rule 37(a)(3)
To Eliminate its Requirement That Specialists Guarantee Execution of
Limit Orders When Certain Conditions Occur in Another Market
October 21, 2005.
I. Introduction
On June 21, 2004, the Chicago Stock Exchange, Inc. (``CHX'' or
``Exchange'') filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
(``Commission''), pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 (``Act'') \1\ and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,\2\ a
proposed rule change to amend Article XX, Rule 37(a)(3) of its rules to
permit, rather than require, CHX specialists to guarantee execution of
limit orders when certain conditions occur in another market. On July
5, 2005, the CHX filed Amendment No. 1 to the proposed rule change.\3\
The proposed rule change, as amended, was published for comment in the
Federal Register on July 14, 2005.\4\ The Commission received no
comments on the proposal. This order approves the proposed rule change,
as amended.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
\2\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
\3\ See Amendment No. 1.
\4\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 51997 (July 8,
2005), 70 FR 40760.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
II. Description of the Proposal
The Exchange proposes to amend Article XX, Rule 37(a)(3), which
provides for execution of resting limit orders based on activity in
other markets, to eliminate the requirement that CHX specialists
guarantee execution of such limit orders when certain conditions occur
in another market. For listed issues, the current rule generally
obligates a CHX specialist to guarantee execution of limit orders
resting in the specialist's book when the issue is being traded in the
primary market at a price equal to or better than the limit price. [For
Nasdaq securities, the rule permits, but does not require, a CHX
specialist to guarantee execution of limit orders resting in the
specialist's book, when another market center's quotation locks or
crosses the limit price.] The CHX represents that the guarantees set
forth in Article XX, Rule 37(a)(3), commonly referred to as ``limit
order protection'' or ``primary market protection,'' were voluntarily
adopted by the Exchange over 15 years ago to attract order flow.
Under the proposed revision to Article XX, Rule 37(a)(3), the
mandate that CHX specialists guarantee execution of resting limit
orders for listed issues, based on triggering activity in other
markets, would be deleted. Instead, the amended rule would permit CHX
specialists to continue to provide such limit order protection
guarantees solely on an issue-by-issue basis, on non-discriminatory
terms approved by the Exchange. The Exchange's existing functionality
providing for automated execution of resting limit orders would remain
available for CHX specialists who elect to continue to guarantee limit
order protection.\5\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\5\ The CHX anticipates that for the foreseeable future, CHX
specialists would continue to provide limit order protection
voluntarily using the criteria for limit order protection previously
set forth in Article XX, Rule 37(a)(3). Should the CHX receive a
request from a specialist to alter the voluntary limit order
protection criteria and agree to alter the functionality, the
Exchange will notify all CHX participants of the change. The
Commission believes any such change would need to be filed pursuant
to Section 19(b) of the Act.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The CHX provided the following rationale for the proposed rule
change. First, as the industry has evolved, the Exchange's principal
competitors for order flow, namely ``third market'' execution venues
and alternative trading systems, do not provide comparable limit order
protection guarantees. In addition, CHX order-sending firms now have
free access to comprehensive monthly order execution
[[Page 62152]]
quality statistics; thus, the CHX believes that ``front-end'' execution
guarantees are no longer necessary to attract order flow. Accordingly,
the Exchange believes that the guarantee no longer serves a clear
competitive purpose. Secondly, since the securities industry converted
to decimal trading, the availability of liquidity at a best bid or
offer price has declined, making it difficult for the CHX specialist,
who chooses to offset his positions in another market, to access
liquidity at the price the rule requires him to provide. Consequently,
the Exchange believes it is no longer appropriate to mandate that
specialists guarantee execution of resting limit orders for listed
issues based on activity in other market centers.
III. Discussion
The Commission finds that the proposed rule change is consistent
with the requirements of the Act and the rules and regulations
thereunder applicable to a national securities exchange \6\ and, in
particular, the requirements of Section 6(b)(5) of the Act \7\ because
it is designed to promote just and equitable principles of trade, to
remove impediments to and perfect the mechanism of a free and open
market and a national market system, and, in general, to protect
investors and the public interest. The Commission agrees that the
environment has changed significantly since the Exchange voluntarily
enacted its rule-based execution guarantees, and that consequently, the
guarantees may no longer serve to foster competition between the
markets.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\6\ In approving this proposed rule change, as amended, the
Commission has considered the proposed rule's impact on efficiency,
competition, and capital formation. 15 U.S.C. 78c(f).
\7\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(5).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
However, the Commission emphasizes that the deletion of the rule-
based mandate regarding limit order protection does not in any way
affect a CHX specialist's obligation to provide best execution, nor
would it modify any other specialist obligations set forth in Article
XXX of the CHX Rules. The Exchange must continue its surveillance of
order executions to ensure that CHX specialists meet all of their
obligations to each order. The Commission further emphasizes that, to
the extent limit order protection guarantees are provided on a
voluntary, issue-by-issue basis, such guarantees would have to be
provided on a non-discriminatory basis.
IV. Conclusion
It is therefore ordered, pursuant to Section 19(b)(2) of the
Act,\8\ that the proposed rule change (SR-CHX-2004-17), as amended, be,
and it hereby is, approved.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\8\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(2).
For the Commission, by the Division of Market Regulation,
pursuant to delegated authority.\9\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\9\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Jonathan G. Katz,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. E5-5972 Filed 10-27-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8010-01-P
