Ameritas Variable Life Insurance Company, et al.:, 61850-61854 [E5-5944]
Download as PDF
61850
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 206 / Wednesday, October 26, 2005 / Notices
based upon resulted in settlement, it
believes that the same level of
widespread support exists for making
the service permanent, and that it
should have no significant adverse
impact on other mailers or competitors.
Accordingly, the Postal Service believes
there is a distinct possibility for
settlement.8 The Postal Service requests
that a settlement conference be
scheduled as soon as possible following
the deadline for intervention. Id. at 2.
IV. Commission Response
Intervention. Those wishing to be
heard in this matter are directed to file
a notice of intervention on or before
November 10, 2005. The notice of
intervention shall be filed using the
Internet (Filing Online) at the
Commission’s Web site (https://
www.prc.gov), unless a waiver is
obtained for hardcopy filing. 39 CFR
3001.9(a) and 10(a). No decision has
been made at this point on whether a
hearing will be held in this case. Notices
should indicate whether participation
will be on a full or limited basis. See 39
CFR 3001.20 and 3001.20a.
Settlement. Given the Postal Service’s
representations that the proposal is
widely supported and should not
adversely affect competitors or other
mailers, the Commission will authorize
settlement negotiations in this
proceeding. It appoints Postal Service
counsel as settlement coordinator. In
this capacity, Postal Service counsel
shall file periodic reports on the status
of settlement discussions. The
Commission authorizes the settlement
coordinator to hold a settlement
conference on November 14–15, 2005.
The Commission will make its hearing
room available for this purpose upon
request. Authorization of settlement
discussions does not constitute a
finding on the necessity of hearings in
this case.
Prehearing conference. A prehearing
conference will be held November 17,
2005, at 10 a.m. in the Commission’s
hearing room. Participants shall be
prepared to identify any issue(s) that
would indicate a need to schedule a
hearing, along with other matters
referred to in this ruling.
Conditional Motion for Waiver.
Participants may comment on the Postal
Service’s conditional motion to waive
certain filing requirements. Responses
to the Postal Service’s Motion for
Waiver are due on or before November
17, 2005.
Representation of the general public.
In conformance with section 3624(a) of
title 39, the Commission designates
8 Request
for Settlement Procedures at 1–2.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:26 Oct 25, 2005
Jkt 208001
Shelley S. Dreifuss, director of the
Commission’s Office of the Consumer
Advocate (OCA), to represent the
interests of the general public in this
proceeding. Pursuant to this
designation, Ms. Dreifuss will direct the
activities of Commission personnel
assigned to assist her and, upon request,
will supply their names for the record.
Neither Ms. Dreifuss nor any of the
assigned personnel will participate in or
provide advice on any Commission
decision in this proceeding.
V. Ordering Paragraphs
It is ordered:
The Commission establishes Docket
No. MC2006–1, Parcel Return Service,
to consider the Postal Service Request
referred to in the body of this order.
1. The Commission will sit en banc in
this proceeding.
2. Postal Service counsel is appointed
to serve as settlement coordinator in this
proceeding. The Commission will make
its hearing room available upon request
for a settlement conference on
November 14–15, 2005, at such times as
scheduled by the settlement
coordinator.
3. Shelley S. Dreifuss, director of the
Commission’s Office of the Consumer
Advocate, is designated to represent the
interests of the general public.
4. The deadline for filing notices of
intervention is November 10, 2005.
5. A prehearing conference will be
held November 17, 2005, at 10 a.m. in
the Commission’s hearing room.
6. Responses to the Postal Service’s
Conditional Motion for Waiver of
certain filing requirements are due on or
before November 17, 2005.
7. The Secretary shall arrange for
publication of this notice and order in
the Federal Register.
By the Commission.
Issued: October 21, 2005.
Garry J. Sikora,
Acting Secretary.
[FR Doc. 05–21401 Filed 10–25–05; 8:45am]
BILLING CODE 7710–FW–P
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
COMMISSION
[Release No. IC–27118; File No. 812–13195]
Ameritas Variable Life Insurance
Company, et al.: Notice of Application
October 20, 2005.
Securities and Exchange
Commission (‘‘Commission’’).
ACTION: Notice of application for an
order pursuant to Section 26(c) of the
Investment Company Act of 1940 (the
AGENCY:
PO 00000
Frm 00074
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
‘‘1940 Act’’ or ‘‘Act’’) approving certain
substitutions of securities and for an
order of exemption pursuant to Section
17(b) of the Act from Section 17(a) of
the Act.
Applicants: Ameritas Variable Life
Insurance Company (‘‘Ameritas’’),
Ameritas Variable Life Insurance
Company Separate Account V
(‘‘Account V’’) and Ameritas Variable
Life Insurance Company Separate
Account VA–2 (‘‘Account VA–2’’,
together with Account V ‘‘Separate
Accounts’’) and Ameritas Investment
Corp. (‘‘Ameritas Investment’’)
(collectively, the ‘‘Applicants’’).
Summary of Application: The
Applicants request an order pursuant to
Section 26(c) of the 1940 Act to permit
the substitution of shares of Calvert
Variable Series, Inc.’s Ameritas
Portfolios (‘‘Ameritas Portfolios’’)
Income & Growth Fund (‘‘Ameritas
Income & Growth’’ or ‘‘Replacement
Fund’’) for (a) shares of Alger American
Leveraged AllCap—Class 0 Portfolio
(‘‘Alger AllCap’’) of the Alger American
Fund and (b) shares of Salomon
Variable All Cap Portfolio (‘‘Salomon
Variable All Cap’’) of the Salomon
Brothers Variable Series Trust (Alger
AllCap and Salomon Variable All Cap
collectively, the ‘‘Substituted
Portfolios’’) currently held by the
Separate Accounts. Applicants also
request an order of exemption pursuant
to Section 17(b) of the 1940 Act from the
provisions of Section 17(a) of the Act to
permit certain in-kind transactions in
connection with the substitutions.
Filing Date: The application was filed
on May 31, 2005 and amended and
restated on September 12, 2005,
September 29, 2005, October 3, 2005
and October 7, 2005.
Hearing or Notification of Hearing: An
order granting the application will be
issued unless the Commission orders a
hearing. Interested person may request a
hearing by writing to the Secretary of
the Commission and serving Applicants
with a copy of the request, in person or
by mail. Hearing requests must be
received by the Commission by 5:30
p.m. on November 14, 2005, and should
be accompanied by proof of service on
the Applicants, in the form of an
affidavit or, for lawyers, a certificate of
service. Hearing requests should state
the nature of the writer’s interest, the
reason for the request, and the issues
contested. Persons who wish to be
notified of a hearing may request
notification by writing to the Secretary
of the Commission.
ADDRESSES: Secretary, Securities and
Exchange Commission, 100 F Street,
NE., Washington, DC 20549–9303.
E:\FR\FM\26OCN1.SGM
26OCN1
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 206 / Wednesday, October 26, 2005 / Notices
Applicants, c/o Kenneth W. Reitz,
Ameritas Variable Life Insurance
Company, 5900 ‘‘O’’ Street, Lincoln, NE
68501.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Joyce M. Pickholz, Senior Counsel, or
William J. Kotapish, Assistant Director,
Office of Insurance Products, Division of
Investment Management at (202) 551–
6795.
The
following is a summary of the
application. The complete application
may be obtained for a fee from the
Public Reference Branch of the
Commission, 100 F Street, NE., Room
1580, Washington, DC 20549 (telephone
(202) 551–5850).
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Applicants’ Representations
1. Ameritas is a stock life insurance
company organized in the State of
Nebraska currently licensed to sell life
insurance in 49 states (all except New
York) and in the District of Columbia.
Ameritas is a wholly owned subsidiary
of AMAL Corp. which is a direct
subsidiary of Ameritas Life Insurance
Corp. Ameritas Life Insurance Corp. is
a subsidiary of Ameritas Acacia Mutual
Holding Company.
2. Ameritas Investment, a Nebraska
corporation, is registered as an
investment adviser under the 1940 Act
and as a broker-dealer under the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934.
Ameritas Investment is an affiliate of
Ameritas. Ameritas Investment is the
investment adviser of the Ameritas
Portfolios and principal underwriter of
the Contracts.
3. Account V is a separate account
established by Ameritas under Nebraska
law to fund variable life insurance
contracts issued by Ameritas. Account
VA–2 is a separate account established
by Ameritas under Nebraska law to fund
variable annuity contracts issued by
Ameritas. Account V and Account VA–
2 are registered under the 1940 Act as
unit investment trusts (File Nos. 811–
04473 and 811–05192 respectively). The
variable life insurance contracts and
variable annuity contracts issued
through the Separate Accounts
(together, ‘‘Contracts’’) have been
registered under the 1933 Act.
4. Calvert Variable Series, Inc.
(‘‘CVS’’) is registered under the 1940
Act as an open-end management
investment company of the series type.
The Ameritas Portfolios, including
Ameritas Income and Growth, are series
of CVS. CVS obtained an order pursuant
to Section 6(c) of the 1940 Act
exempting it and Ameritas Investment,
as investment advisor, from Section
15(a) of the 1940 Act with respect to
subadvisory agreements (the ‘‘Manager
of Managers Order’’). The Manager of
Managers Order permits Ameritas
Investment to replace any sub-adviser or
to employ a new sub-adviser for each of
its series without obtaining shareholder
approval. At a meeting held on January
15, 2002, shareholders of each Ameritas
Portfolio approved the implementation
of procedures contemplated in the
Manager of Managers Order. Fred Alger
Management, Inc. is the subadviser to
Ameritas Income & Growth.
5. Each of the Contracts permits its
owners to allocate the Contract’s
accumulated value among numerous
Subaccounts of the Separate Accounts.
Each Subaccount invests exclusively in
a different investment portfolio
(‘‘Fund’’) of an underlying mutual fund.
Depending on the Contract, between
twenty-one and thirty-six different
Subaccounts (and corresponding funds)
are currently available for this purpose.
6. Contract Owners can allocate
accumulated Contract value to one or
more Subaccounts and/or, where
available, to the Fixed Account, subject
to certain potential restrictions
described in the application and in the
prospectus relating to each Contract. No
sales charge applies to any transfer of
accumulated Contract value among
Subaccounts. Applicants represent that
the relief requested here will not affect
any charge to which Contract Owners of
any Contract would otherwise be
subject, or affect any right or privilege
to which such owners are otherwise
entitled.
7. The Contracts expressly reserve to
Ameritas the right to substitute shares of
another investment company for shares
61851
of an investment company held by a
Subaccount of the Separate Accounts.
Ameritas proposes to substitute shares
of Ameritas Income and Growth for
shares of (a) Alger AllCap and (b)
Salomon Variable All Cap held by
Subaccounts of the Separate Accounts
(each a ‘‘Substitution’’ and together, the
‘‘Substitutions’’).
8. The investment objectives and
principal investment policies of the
Replacement Fund and the Substituted
Portfolios are as follows: Ameritas
Income & Growth primarily seeks to
provide a high level of dividend
income, with a secondary goal to
provide capital appreciation, by
investing in dividend paying equity
securities, such as common or preferred
stocks, preferably those which the
subadviser believes also offer
opportunities for capital appreciation.
Alger AllCap seeks long-term capital
appreciation by investing in equity
securities of companies of any size
which demonstrate promising growth
potential. Salomon Variable All Cap
seeks capital appreciation by investing
primarily in securities which the
manager believes have above-average
capital appreciation potential. A
secondary consideration is given to a
company’s dividend record and the
potential for improved dividend return.
Salomon Variable All Cap invests
primarily in common stocks and
common stock equivalents of large well
known domestic companies, but may
also invest a significant portion of its
assets in securities of small to mediumsized companies and may invest in
fixed income securities, convertible debt
securities, securities of foreign issuers,
and in non-dividend paying stocks.
9. Following is the comparative
expense data for the Substitutions as of
December 31, 2004. Applicants submit
that each Substitution will result in a
Replacement Fund with net expenses
and management fees less than the
Substituted Fund. Applicants also
represent that there are no breakpoints
in fund expenses for either the
Substituted Funds or the Replacement
Fund.
[In percent]
Substituted
fund
Alger AllCap
Management Fees ...........................................................................................
Distribution and service (12b–1) fees ..............................................................
Other Expenses ...............................................................................................
Total Expenses ................................................................................................
Waivers ............................................................................................................
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:26 Oct 25, 2005
Jkt 208001
PO 00000
Frm 00075
Fmt 4703
Replacement
fund
Ameritas Income &
Growth
Substituted
fund
Salomon Variable All Cap
Replacement
fund
Ameritas Income &
Growth
0.85
........................
0.12
0.97
........................
0.74
........................
0.22
0.96
1 0.18
0.75
........................
0.05
0.80
........................
0.74
........................
0.22
0.96
2 0.18
Sfmt 4703
E:\FR\FM\26OCN1.SGM
26OCN1
61852
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 206 / Wednesday, October 26, 2005 / Notices
[In percent]
Substituted
fund
Alger AllCap
Net Expenses ..................................................................................................
Replacement
fund
Ameritas Income &
Growth
0.97
0.78
Substituted
fund
Salomon Variable All Cap
0.80
Replacement
fund
Ameritas Income &
Growth
0.78
1 Pursuant
to a contractual agreement between Ameritas Portfolios and Ameritas Investment, Ameritas Investment, has agreed to waive fees
or reimburse expenses so that Total Expenses do not exceed the rate shown in the table above through April 30, 2006. Management Fee includes both the investment advisory fee and administrative service fee. The administrative service fee is 0.05% of the fund’s average daily net
assets with a minimum of $50,000.
2 Supra, footnote 1.
10. The day-to-day manager of both
the Substituted Alger AllCap Fund as its
adviser and to the Replacement
Ameritas Income & Growth Fund as its
subadviser is Fred Alger Management,
Inc.
11. Applicants note that Contract
Owners with Subaccount balances
invested in shares of the Replacement
Funds will have lower total expense
ratios than they currently have in the
Substituted Funds. Moreover, there will
be no increase in Contract fees and
expenses including mortality and
expense risk fees and administration
and distribution fees charged to the
Separate Accounts as a result of the
Substitutions. Applicants believe that, if
the proposed Substitutions are
implemented, the core investment goals
of affected Contract Owners will not be
frustrated and the investment
expectations of affected Contract
Owners can continue to be met.
Applicants expect that the Substitutions
will provide significant benefits to
Contract Owners, including improved
selection of portfolio managers and
simplification of fund offerings through
the elimination of overlapping offerings.
Applicants state that Ameritas
considered the performance history of
the Substituted Funds and the
Replacement Funds and determined
that no Contract Owners would be
materially adversely affected as a result
of the Substitutions. Applicants believe
that the Substitutions, each of which
replaces outside funds with a fund for
which Ameritas Investment acts as
investment advisor, will permit
Ameritas Investment, under a multimanager order granted by the
Commission and under shareholder
approval previously obtained, to hire,
monitor and replace subadvisers as
necessary to seek optimal performance
and to ensure a consistent investment
style. Applicants further believe that the
subadviser to the Replacement Fund is
better positioned to provide consistent
above-average performance for its Fund
than the adviser or subadvisers of the
Substituted Funds. Applicants state that
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:26 Oct 25, 2005
Jkt 208001
Contract Owners will continue to be
able to select among a large number of
funds, with a full range of investment
objectives, investment strategies, and
managers. Applicants believe there will
also be a significant savings to Contract
Owners because certain costs, such as
the costs of printing and mailing lengthy
periodic reports and prospectuses for
the Substituted Funds will be
substantially reduced.
12. Applicants represent that they
will not receive, for three years from the
date of the Substitutions, any direct or
indirect benefits from the new fund, its
advisors or underwriters, or from
affiliates of the new funds, their
advisors or underwriters, in connection
with assets attributable to Contracts
affected by the Substitutions, at a higher
rate than Applicants have received from
substituted funds, their advisors or
underwriters, or from affiliates of
substituted funds, their advisors or
underwriters, including without
limitation Rule 12b–1 fees, shareholder
service or administrative or other
service fees, revenue sharing or other
arrangements (collectively ‘‘Revenue
Arrangements’’). Applicants represent
that the substitutions and the selection
of the new fund was not motivated by
any financial consideration paid or to be
paid to Applicants or any affiliate of
Applicants by the new fund, its
advisors, underwriters, or affiliates.
13. The proposed Substitutions will
take place at relative net asset value
with no change in the amount of any
Contract Owner’s Contract value, cash
value, or death benefit or in the dollar
value of his or her investment in the
Separate Accounts. Applicants expect
that the Substitutions will be effected by
redeeming shares of a Substituted Fund
and reinvesting the proceeds of such
redemption in shares of the
Replacement Fund through a
combination of cash and ‘‘in kind’’
transactions.
14. Contract Owners will not incur
any fees or charges as a result of the
proposed Substitutions, nor will their
rights or Ameritas’ obligations under the
Contracts be altered in any way. All
PO 00000
Frm 00076
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
expenses incurred in connection with
the proposed Substitutions, including
brokerage, legal, accounting, and other
fees and expenses, will be paid by
Ameritas. In addition, the proposed
Substitutions will not impose any tax
liability on Contract Owners. The
proposed Substitutions will not cause
the Contract fees and charges currently
being paid by existing Contract owners
to be greater after the proposed
Substitutions than before the proposed
Substitutions. No fees will be charged
on the transfers made at the time of the
proposed Substitutions because the
proposed Substitutions will not be
treated as a transfer for the purpose of
assessing transfer charges or for
determining the number of remaining
permissible transfers in a Contract year.
15. Following the date on which
Ameritas is notified that the notice of
the Application is to be published in the
Federal Register, but before the date on
which the order requested by the
application becomes effective, Ameritas
will send to affected Contract Owners
notice (‘‘Substitution Notice’’). The
Substitution Notice will inform affected
Contract Owners of (a) the Effective Date
of the Substitutions (‘‘Effective Date’’);
(b) the right of each affected Contract
Owner, under their Contract, to transfer
contract values among the various
Subaccounts; and (c) the fact that any
such transfer involving a transfer from
a substituted fund will not be subject to
any administrative charge and will not
count as one of the ‘‘free transfers’’ to
which affected Contract Owners may
otherwise be entitled. The Substitution
Notice will also inform affected Contract
Owners that (a) Ameritas will not
exercise any rights reserved under any
Contract to impose additional
restrictions on transfers (other than with
respect to ‘‘market timing’’ activity
described in each Contract’s prospectus)
until at least 30 days after the proposed
Substitutions; (b) for 30 days after the
proposed Substitutions, Ameritas will
permit affected Contract Owners to
make transfers of Contract value (or
annuity unit exchange) out of the
E:\FR\FM\26OCN1.SGM
26OCN1
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 206 / Wednesday, October 26, 2005 / Notices
Replacement Fund Subaccount to
another Subaccount without the transfer
(or exchange) being treated as one of a
limited number of transfers (or
exchanges) permitted without a transfer
charge.
16. Within five days after the Effective
Date, Ameritas will also send affected
Contract Owners a second written
notice (‘‘Confirmation Notice’’). The
Confirmation Notice will (a) confirm
that the Substitutions were carried out;
(b) reiterate that each affected Contract
Owner may transfer all of the contract
value or cash value under a Contract
that is invested in a Substituted Fund to
any other Subaccount available under
their Contract without such transfer
being subject to any administrative
charge, or being counted as one of the
‘‘free transfers’’ (or one of the limited
number of transfers) to which affected
Contract Owners may be entitled under
the Contracts; and (c) state that, other
than with respect to ‘‘market timing’’
activity described above, Ameritas will
not exercise any rights reserved by it
under the Contracts to impose
additional restrictions on transfers until
at least 30 days after the Effective Date.
17. For those who were Contract
Owners on the date of the proposed
Substitutions, Ameritas and Ameritas
Investment will reimburse, on the last
business day of each fiscal period (not
to exceed a fiscal quarter) during the
twenty-four months following the date
of the proposed Substitutions, the
Subaccount investing in the
Replacement Fund such that the sum of
the Replacement Fund’s operating
expenses (taking into account fee
waivers and expense reimbursements)
and Subaccount expenses (asset-based
fees and charges deducted on a daily
basis from Subaccount assets and
reflected in the calculation of
Subaccount unit values) for such period
will not exceed, on an annualized basis,
the sum of the Replacement Fund’s
operating expenses (taking into account
fee waivers and expense
reimbursements) and Subaccount
expenses for the fiscal year preceding
the date of the proposed Substitutions.
In addition, for twenty-four months
following the proposed Substitutions,
Ameritas and Ameritas Investment will
not increase separate account fees or
charges for Contracts outstanding on the
date of the proposed Substitutions.
Applicants’ Legal Analysis
1. Section 26(c) of the 1940 Act
provides, in pertinent part, that ‘‘it shall
be unlawful for any depositor or trustee
of a registered unit investment trust
holding the security of a single issuer to
substitute another security for such
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:26 Oct 25, 2005
Jkt 208001
security unless the Commission shall
have approved such substitution.’’
Section 26(c) of the 1940 Act also
provides that the Commission shall
issue an order approving such
substitutions if the evidence establishes
that the substitutions are consistent
with the protection of investors and the
purposes fairly intended by the policies
and provisions of the 1940 Act.
2. The Contracts expressly reserve to
Ameritas the right, subject to
compliance with applicable law, to
substitute shares of another investment
company for shares of an investment
company held by a Subaccount of the
Separate Accounts. Applicants assert
that the prospectuses for the Contracts
and the Separate Accounts contain
appropriate disclosure of this right.
3. In each case, Applicants believe
that it is in the best interests of the
Contract Owners to substitute the
Replacement Fund for the Substituted
Fund. In this regard, Applicants
contend that the proposed Replacement
Fund for each Substituted Fund has an
investment objective that is at least
substantially similar to that of the
Substituted Fund. Applicants also assert
that the principal investment policies of
the Replacement Funds are similar to
those of the corresponding Substituted
Funds. In addition, with respect to each
proposed substitution, Applicants note
that affected Contract Owners with
balances invested in the Replacement
Fund will have a lower or the same
expense ratio in all cases.
4. Applicants anticipate that Contract
Owners will be better off with the array
of Subaccounts offered after the
proposed Substitutions than they have
been with the array of Subaccounts
offered prior to the Substitutions. The
proposed Substitutions retain for
Contract Owners the investment
flexibility which is a central feature of
the Contracts. If the proposed
Substitutions are carried out, all
Contract Owners will be permitted to
allocate purchase payment and transfer
Contract values and cash values
between and among approximately the
same number of Subaccounts as they
could before the proposed Substitutions.
Moreover, the elimination of the costs of
printing and mailing prospectuses and
periodic reports of the Substituted
Funds will benefit Contract Owners.
5. Applicants note that Contract
Owners who do not wish to participate
in a Replacement Fund will have an
opportunity to reallocate their
accumulated value among other
available Subaccounts without the
imposition of any charge or limitation
(other than with respect to ‘‘market
timing’’ activity).
PO 00000
Frm 00077
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
61853
6. Applicants assert that, for the
reasons summarized above, the
proposed Substitutions and related
transactions meet the standards of
Section 26(c) of the 1940 Act and that
the requested order should be granted.
7. Sections 17(a)(1) and (2) of the 1940
Act prohibit an affiliated person of a
registered investment company, or
affiliated persons of any such affiliated
person, or any principal underwriter for
such company (collectively,
‘‘Transaction Affiliates’’) from selling a
security to, or purchasing a security
from, the registered investment
company. Applicants may be deemed to
be Transaction Affiliates of one another
based upon the definition of ‘‘affiliated
person’’ under Section 2(a)(3) of the
1940 Act. Because the Substitutions
may be effected, in whole or in part, by
means of in-kind redemptions and
purchases, the Substitutions may be
deemed to involve one or more
purchases or sales of securities or
property between Transaction Affiliates.
8. Section 17(b) provides that the
Commission may grant an application
exempting proposed transactions from
the prohibitions of Section 17(a) if the
terms of the proposed transaction are
reasonable and fair and do not involve
overreaching on the part of any person
concerned; the transaction is consistent
with the investment policies of each
registered investment company
concerned; and the transaction is
consistent with the general purposes of
the Act. Applicants state that the
consideration to be paid by the
Replacement Fund, and each of the
Substituted Funds, will be fair and
reasonable and will not involve
overreaching because the Substitutions
will not result in the dilution of the
interests of any affected Contract
Owners and will not effect any change
in economic interest, Contract value or
the dollar value of any variable contract
held by an affected Contract Owner.
9. In addition, Applicants state that to
the extent the Substitutions are effected
by redeeming shares of the Substituted
Funds and using the redemption
proceeds to purchase shares of the
Replacement Funds, the Substitutions
will satisfy each of the procedural
safeguards adopted by the Board of
Directors responsible for each of the
Ameritas Portfolios and the Substituted
Funds, respectively under Rule 17a–7
under the 1940 Act.
Applicants’ Conclusion
Applicants assert that for the reasons
summarized above the proposed
substitutions and transactions meet the
standards of Section 26(c) of the Act and
are consistent with the standards of
E:\FR\FM\26OCN1.SGM
26OCN1
61854
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 206 / Wednesday, October 26, 2005 / Notices
Section 17(b) of the Act and that the
requested orders should be granted.
For the Commission, by the Division of
Investment Management, pursuant to
delegated authority.
Jonathan G. Katz,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. E5–5944 Filed 10–25–05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8010–01–P
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
COMMISSION
[Release No. 34–52646; File No. SR–Amex–
2005–068]
Self-Regulatory Organizations;
American Stock Exchange LLC; Order
Granting Approval of Proposed Rule
Change and Amendment Nos. 1 and 2
Thereto Relating to Amendments to
Amex Rules 26 and 27
October 20, 2005.
On June 17, 2005, the American Stock
Exchange LLC (‘‘Amex’’ or ‘‘Exchange’’)
filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission (‘‘Commission’’), pursuant
to section 19(b)(1) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 (‘‘Act’’) 1 and Rule
19b–4 thereunder,2 a proposed rule
change to: (i) Combine the Equities,
Options and Special Allocations
Committees into a single Allocations
Committee; (ii) change the composition
of the new Allocations Committee; and
(iii) provide the Performance Committee
with sole authority to reallocate
securities in connection with specialist
unit transfers resulting from business
transactions. On June 30, 2005, Amex
filed Amendment No. 1 to the proposed
rule change.3 On August 19, 2005,
Amex filed Amendment No. 2 to the
proposed rule change.4 The proposed
rule change, as amended, was published
for comment in the Federal Register on
September 1, 2005.5 The Commission
received no comments on the proposal.
This order approves the proposed rule
change, as amended.
The proposed rule change would
combine the existing Equity, Options
1 15
U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
CFR 240.19b–4.
3 In Amendment No. 1, the Exchange made a
technical correction to the proposed amendment to
Amex Rule 26 and proposed to amend Amex Rule
27 to reflect that, in the case of an equity security,
the list of qualified specialists shall consist of five
specialists.
4 In Amendment No. 2, the Exchange proposed to
amend Amex Rule 27 to clarify: (1) the composition
of the Allocations Committee for equities and other
securities admitted for trading on the Exchange
except Exchange Traded Funds (‘‘ETFs’’) and
options; and (2) that the Allocations Committee
may be chaired by the Chief Executive Officer’s
designee.
5 See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 52334
(August 25, 2005), 70 FR 52146.
2 17
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:26 Oct 25, 2005
Jkt 208001
and Special Allocations Committees
into a single Allocations Committee for
equities, options and other listed
securities. The proposal would create a
single Allocations Committee consisting
of the Chief Executive Officer (or his or
her designee 6), a representative of an
upstairs member firm and either: (i)
Four (4) brokers for equities and other
securities admitted to trading on the
Exchange except for Exchange Traded
Funds and options; (ii) two (2) brokers
and two (2) Registered Traders for ETFs;
or (iii) two (2) brokers and two (2)
Registered Options Traders for options.
The Chief Executive Officer (or his or
her designee) would chair the
Allocations Committee and would not
vote except to make or break a tie. In the
absence of the Chief Executive Officer
(or his or her designee), a Floor
Governor or a Senior Floor Official may
chair the Allocation Committee. In
addition, the Exchange proposes to
permit the Performance Committee to
reallocate securities in connection with
specialist unit transfers resulting from
business transactions.
The Commission finds that the
proposed rule change, as amended, is
consistent with the requirements of
section 6 of the Act,7 and the rules and
regulations thereunder applicable to a
national securities exchange.8 In
particular, the Commission finds that
the proposed rule change is consistent
with section 6(b)(5) of the Act,9 which
requires, among other things, that the
Exchange’s rules be designed to prevent
fraudulent and manipulative acts and
practices, to promote just and equitable
principles of trade, to foster cooperation
and coordination with persons engaged
in facilitating transactions in securities,
and to remove impediments to and
perfect the mechanism of a free and
open market and a national market
system. The Commission believes that,
by combining the Equities, Options and
Special Allocations Committees into a
single Allocations Committee and
streamlining the composition of the
Allocations Committee, the proposed
rule change is designed to reduce
potential inefficiencies in connection
6 The Exchange represents that the designee of the
Chief Executive Officer would be an Exchange
employee knowledgeable about the securities
business and capable of representing the views of
the Chief Executive Officer. Telephone conversation
of October 12, 2005, between Jeffery Burns,
Associate General Counsel, Amex, and David
Michehl, Attorney, Division of Market Regulation,
Commission.
7 15 U.S.C. 78f(b).
8 In approving this proposed rule change, the
Commission has considered the proposed rule’s
impact on efficiency, competition, and capital
formation. 15 U.S.C. 78c(f).
9 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(5).
PO 00000
Frm 00078
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
with the securities allocation process. In
addition, the Commission believes that,
by providing the Performance
Committee with the sole authority to
reallocate securities in connection with
specialist unit transfers, the proposed
rule change is designed to streamline
the reallocation process in these special
circumstances.
It is therefore ordered, pursuant to
section 19(b)(2) of the Act,10 that the
proposed rule change (SR–Amex–2005–
068), as amended, is approved.
For the Commission, by the Division of
Market Regulation, pursuant to delegated
authority.11
Jonathan G. Katz,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. E5–5946 Filed 10–25–05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8010–01–P
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
COMMISSION
[Release No. 34–52639; File No. SR–BSE–
2005–41]
Self-Regulatory Organizations; Boston
Stock Exchange, Inc.; Notice of Filing
and Order Granting Accelerated
Approval to Proposed Rule Change To
Establish Certain Fees With Respect to
Transactions Executed Through the
Intermarket Trading System
October 19, 2005.
Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(‘‘Act’’) 1 and Rule 19b–4 thereunder,2
notice is hereby given that on
September 9, 2005, the Boston Stock
Exchange, Inc. (‘‘BSE’’ or ‘‘Exchange’’)
filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission (‘‘Commission’’ or ‘‘SEC’’)
the proposed rule change as described
in Items I and II below, which Items
have been prepared by the BSE. The
Commission is publishing this notice to
solicit comments on the proposed rule
change from interested persons, and is
approving the proposal on an
accelerated basis.
I. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Terms of Substance of
the Proposed Rule Change
The Exchange proposes to enter into
arrangements with other national
securities exchanges to pass certain fees
they have collected from members for
transactions executed on another
exchange through the Intermarket
Trading System (‘‘ITS’’). This proposal
10 15
U.S.C. 78s(b)(2).
CFR 200.30–3(a)(12).
1 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
2 17 CFR 240.19b–4.
11 17
E:\FR\FM\26OCN1.SGM
26OCN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 206 (Wednesday, October 26, 2005)]
[Notices]
[Pages 61850-61854]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E5-5944]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
[Release No. IC-27118; File No. 812-13195]
Ameritas Variable Life Insurance Company, et al.: Notice of
Application
October 20, 2005.
AGENCY: Securities and Exchange Commission (``Commission'').
ACTION: Notice of application for an order pursuant to Section 26(c) of
the Investment Company Act of 1940 (the ``1940 Act'' or ``Act'')
approving certain substitutions of securities and for an order of
exemption pursuant to Section 17(b) of the Act from Section 17(a) of
the Act.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Applicants: Ameritas Variable Life Insurance Company
(``Ameritas''), Ameritas Variable Life Insurance Company Separate
Account V (``Account V'') and Ameritas Variable Life Insurance Company
Separate Account VA-2 (``Account VA-2'', together with Account V
``Separate Accounts'') and Ameritas Investment Corp. (``Ameritas
Investment'') (collectively, the ``Applicants'').
Summary of Application: The Applicants request an order pursuant to
Section 26(c) of the 1940 Act to permit the substitution of shares of
Calvert Variable Series, Inc.'s Ameritas Portfolios (``Ameritas
Portfolios'') Income & Growth Fund (``Ameritas Income & Growth'' or
``Replacement Fund'') for (a) shares of Alger American Leveraged
AllCap--Class 0 Portfolio (``Alger AllCap'') of the Alger American Fund
and (b) shares of Salomon Variable All Cap Portfolio (``Salomon
Variable All Cap'') of the Salomon Brothers Variable Series Trust
(Alger AllCap and Salomon Variable All Cap collectively, the
``Substituted Portfolios'') currently held by the Separate Accounts.
Applicants also request an order of exemption pursuant to Section 17(b)
of the 1940 Act from the provisions of Section 17(a) of the Act to
permit certain in-kind transactions in connection with the
substitutions.
Filing Date: The application was filed on May 31, 2005 and amended
and restated on September 12, 2005, September 29, 2005, October 3, 2005
and October 7, 2005.
Hearing or Notification of Hearing: An order granting the
application will be issued unless the Commission orders a hearing.
Interested person may request a hearing by writing to the Secretary of
the Commission and serving Applicants with a copy of the request, in
person or by mail. Hearing requests must be received by the Commission
by 5:30 p.m. on November 14, 2005, and should be accompanied by proof
of service on the Applicants, in the form of an affidavit or, for
lawyers, a certificate of service. Hearing requests should state the
nature of the writer's interest, the reason for the request, and the
issues contested. Persons who wish to be notified of a hearing may
request notification by writing to the Secretary of the Commission.
ADDRESSES: Secretary, Securities and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street,
NE., Washington, DC 20549-9303.
[[Page 61851]]
Applicants, c/o Kenneth W. Reitz, Ameritas Variable Life Insurance
Company, 5900 ``O'' Street, Lincoln, NE 68501.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Joyce M. Pickholz, Senior Counsel, or
William J. Kotapish, Assistant Director, Office of Insurance Products,
Division of Investment Management at (202) 551-6795.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The following is a summary of the
application. The complete application may be obtained for a fee from
the Public Reference Branch of the Commission, 100 F Street, NE., Room
1580, Washington, DC 20549 (telephone (202) 551-5850).
Applicants' Representations
1. Ameritas is a stock life insurance company organized in the
State of Nebraska currently licensed to sell life insurance in 49
states (all except New York) and in the District of Columbia. Ameritas
is a wholly owned subsidiary of AMAL Corp. which is a direct subsidiary
of Ameritas Life Insurance Corp. Ameritas Life Insurance Corp. is a
subsidiary of Ameritas Acacia Mutual Holding Company.
2. Ameritas Investment, a Nebraska corporation, is registered as an
investment adviser under the 1940 Act and as a broker-dealer under the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934. Ameritas Investment is an affiliate of
Ameritas. Ameritas Investment is the investment adviser of the Ameritas
Portfolios and principal underwriter of the Contracts.
3. Account V is a separate account established by Ameritas under
Nebraska law to fund variable life insurance contracts issued by
Ameritas. Account VA-2 is a separate account established by Ameritas
under Nebraska law to fund variable annuity contracts issued by
Ameritas. Account V and Account VA-2 are registered under the 1940 Act
as unit investment trusts (File Nos. 811-04473 and 811-05192
respectively). The variable life insurance contracts and variable
annuity contracts issued through the Separate Accounts (together,
``Contracts'') have been registered under the 1933 Act.
4. Calvert Variable Series, Inc. (``CVS'') is registered under the
1940 Act as an open-end management investment company of the series
type. The Ameritas Portfolios, including Ameritas Income and Growth,
are series of CVS. CVS obtained an order pursuant to Section 6(c) of
the 1940 Act exempting it and Ameritas Investment, as investment
advisor, from Section 15(a) of the 1940 Act with respect to subadvisory
agreements (the ``Manager of Managers Order''). The Manager of Managers
Order permits Ameritas Investment to replace any sub-adviser or to
employ a new sub-adviser for each of its series without obtaining
shareholder approval. At a meeting held on January 15, 2002,
shareholders of each Ameritas Portfolio approved the implementation of
procedures contemplated in the Manager of Managers Order. Fred Alger
Management, Inc. is the subadviser to Ameritas Income & Growth.
5. Each of the Contracts permits its owners to allocate the
Contract's accumulated value among numerous Subaccounts of the Separate
Accounts. Each Subaccount invests exclusively in a different investment
portfolio (``Fund'') of an underlying mutual fund. Depending on the
Contract, between twenty-one and thirty-six different Subaccounts (and
corresponding funds) are currently available for this purpose.
6. Contract Owners can allocate accumulated Contract value to one
or more Subaccounts and/or, where available, to the Fixed Account,
subject to certain potential restrictions described in the application
and in the prospectus relating to each Contract. No sales charge
applies to any transfer of accumulated Contract value among
Subaccounts. Applicants represent that the relief requested here will
not affect any charge to which Contract Owners of any Contract would
otherwise be subject, or affect any right or privilege to which such
owners are otherwise entitled.
7. The Contracts expressly reserve to Ameritas the right to
substitute shares of another investment company for shares of an
investment company held by a Subaccount of the Separate Accounts.
Ameritas proposes to substitute shares of Ameritas Income and Growth
for shares of (a) Alger AllCap and (b) Salomon Variable All Cap held by
Subaccounts of the Separate Accounts (each a ``Substitution'' and
together, the ``Substitutions'').
8. The investment objectives and principal investment policies of
the Replacement Fund and the Substituted Portfolios are as follows:
Ameritas Income & Growth primarily seeks to provide a high level of
dividend income, with a secondary goal to provide capital appreciation,
by investing in dividend paying equity securities, such as common or
preferred stocks, preferably those which the subadviser believes also
offer opportunities for capital appreciation. Alger AllCap seeks long-
term capital appreciation by investing in equity securities of
companies of any size which demonstrate promising growth potential.
Salomon Variable All Cap seeks capital appreciation by investing
primarily in securities which the manager believes have above-average
capital appreciation potential. A secondary consideration is given to a
company's dividend record and the potential for improved dividend
return. Salomon Variable All Cap invests primarily in common stocks and
common stock equivalents of large well known domestic companies, but
may also invest a significant portion of its assets in securities of
small to medium-sized companies and may invest in fixed income
securities, convertible debt securities, securities of foreign issuers,
and in non-dividend paying stocks.
9. Following is the comparative expense data for the Substitutions
as of December 31, 2004. Applicants submit that each Substitution will
result in a Replacement Fund with net expenses and management fees less
than the Substituted Fund. Applicants also represent that there are no
breakpoints in fund expenses for either the Substituted Funds or the
Replacement Fund.
[In percent]
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Replacement Substituted Replacement
Substituted fund Ameritas fund Salomon fund Ameritas
fund Alger Income & Variable All Income &
AllCap Growth Cap Growth
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Management Fees................................. 0.85 0.74 0.75 0.74
Distribution and service (12b-1) fees........... .............. .............. .............. ..............
Other Expenses.................................. 0.12 0.22 0.05 0.22
Total Expenses.................................. 0.97 0.96 0.80 0.96
Waivers......................................... .............. \1\ 0.18 .............. \2\ 0.18
[[Page 61852]]
Net Expenses.................................... 0.97 0.78 0.80 0.78
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ Pursuant to a contractual agreement between Ameritas Portfolios and Ameritas Investment, Ameritas
Investment, has agreed to waive fees or reimburse expenses so that Total Expenses do not exceed the rate shown
in the table above through April 30, 2006. Management Fee includes both the investment advisory fee and
administrative service fee. The administrative service fee is 0.05% of the fund's average daily net assets
with a minimum of $50,000.
\2\ Supra, footnote 1.
10. The day-to-day manager of both the Substituted Alger AllCap
Fund as its adviser and to the Replacement Ameritas Income & Growth
Fund as its subadviser is Fred Alger Management, Inc.
11. Applicants note that Contract Owners with Subaccount balances
invested in shares of the Replacement Funds will have lower total
expense ratios than they currently have in the Substituted Funds.
Moreover, there will be no increase in Contract fees and expenses
including mortality and expense risk fees and administration and
distribution fees charged to the Separate Accounts as a result of the
Substitutions. Applicants believe that, if the proposed Substitutions
are implemented, the core investment goals of affected Contract Owners
will not be frustrated and the investment expectations of affected
Contract Owners can continue to be met. Applicants expect that the
Substitutions will provide significant benefits to Contract Owners,
including improved selection of portfolio managers and simplification
of fund offerings through the elimination of overlapping offerings.
Applicants state that Ameritas considered the performance history
of the Substituted Funds and the Replacement Funds and determined that
no Contract Owners would be materially adversely affected as a result
of the Substitutions. Applicants believe that the Substitutions, each
of which replaces outside funds with a fund for which Ameritas
Investment acts as investment advisor, will permit Ameritas Investment,
under a multi-manager order granted by the Commission and under
shareholder approval previously obtained, to hire, monitor and replace
subadvisers as necessary to seek optimal performance and to ensure a
consistent investment style. Applicants further believe that the
subadviser to the Replacement Fund is better positioned to provide
consistent above-average performance for its Fund than the adviser or
subadvisers of the Substituted Funds. Applicants state that Contract
Owners will continue to be able to select among a large number of
funds, with a full range of investment objectives, investment
strategies, and managers. Applicants believe there will also be a
significant savings to Contract Owners because certain costs, such as
the costs of printing and mailing lengthy periodic reports and
prospectuses for the Substituted Funds will be substantially reduced.
12. Applicants represent that they will not receive, for three
years from the date of the Substitutions, any direct or indirect
benefits from the new fund, its advisors or underwriters, or from
affiliates of the new funds, their advisors or underwriters, in
connection with assets attributable to Contracts affected by the
Substitutions, at a higher rate than Applicants have received from
substituted funds, their advisors or underwriters, or from affiliates
of substituted funds, their advisors or underwriters, including without
limitation Rule 12b-1 fees, shareholder service or administrative or
other service fees, revenue sharing or other arrangements (collectively
``Revenue Arrangements''). Applicants represent that the substitutions
and the selection of the new fund was not motivated by any financial
consideration paid or to be paid to Applicants or any affiliate of
Applicants by the new fund, its advisors, underwriters, or affiliates.
13. The proposed Substitutions will take place at relative net
asset value with no change in the amount of any Contract Owner's
Contract value, cash value, or death benefit or in the dollar value of
his or her investment in the Separate Accounts. Applicants expect that
the Substitutions will be effected by redeeming shares of a Substituted
Fund and reinvesting the proceeds of such redemption in shares of the
Replacement Fund through a combination of cash and ``in kind''
transactions.
14. Contract Owners will not incur any fees or charges as a result
of the proposed Substitutions, nor will their rights or Ameritas'
obligations under the Contracts be altered in any way. All expenses
incurred in connection with the proposed Substitutions, including
brokerage, legal, accounting, and other fees and expenses, will be paid
by Ameritas. In addition, the proposed Substitutions will not impose
any tax liability on Contract Owners. The proposed Substitutions will
not cause the Contract fees and charges currently being paid by
existing Contract owners to be greater after the proposed Substitutions
than before the proposed Substitutions. No fees will be charged on the
transfers made at the time of the proposed Substitutions because the
proposed Substitutions will not be treated as a transfer for the
purpose of assessing transfer charges or for determining the number of
remaining permissible transfers in a Contract year.
15. Following the date on which Ameritas is notified that the
notice of the Application is to be published in the Federal Register,
but before the date on which the order requested by the application
becomes effective, Ameritas will send to affected Contract Owners
notice (``Substitution Notice''). The Substitution Notice will inform
affected Contract Owners of (a) the Effective Date of the Substitutions
(``Effective Date''); (b) the right of each affected Contract Owner,
under their Contract, to transfer contract values among the various
Subaccounts; and (c) the fact that any such transfer involving a
transfer from a substituted fund will not be subject to any
administrative charge and will not count as one of the ``free
transfers'' to which affected Contract Owners may otherwise be
entitled. The Substitution Notice will also inform affected Contract
Owners that (a) Ameritas will not exercise any rights reserved under
any Contract to impose additional restrictions on transfers (other than
with respect to ``market timing'' activity described in each Contract's
prospectus) until at least 30 days after the proposed Substitutions;
(b) for 30 days after the proposed Substitutions, Ameritas will permit
affected Contract Owners to make transfers of Contract value (or
annuity unit exchange) out of the
[[Page 61853]]
Replacement Fund Subaccount to another Subaccount without the transfer
(or exchange) being treated as one of a limited number of transfers (or
exchanges) permitted without a transfer charge.
16. Within five days after the Effective Date, Ameritas will also
send affected Contract Owners a second written notice (``Confirmation
Notice''). The Confirmation Notice will (a) confirm that the
Substitutions were carried out; (b) reiterate that each affected
Contract Owner may transfer all of the contract value or cash value
under a Contract that is invested in a Substituted Fund to any other
Subaccount available under their Contract without such transfer being
subject to any administrative charge, or being counted as one of the
``free transfers'' (or one of the limited number of transfers) to which
affected Contract Owners may be entitled under the Contracts; and (c)
state that, other than with respect to ``market timing'' activity
described above, Ameritas will not exercise any rights reserved by it
under the Contracts to impose additional restrictions on transfers
until at least 30 days after the Effective Date.
17. For those who were Contract Owners on the date of the proposed
Substitutions, Ameritas and Ameritas Investment will reimburse, on the
last business day of each fiscal period (not to exceed a fiscal
quarter) during the twenty-four months following the date of the
proposed Substitutions, the Subaccount investing in the Replacement
Fund such that the sum of the Replacement Fund's operating expenses
(taking into account fee waivers and expense reimbursements) and
Subaccount expenses (asset-based fees and charges deducted on a daily
basis from Subaccount assets and reflected in the calculation of
Subaccount unit values) for such period will not exceed, on an
annualized basis, the sum of the Replacement Fund's operating expenses
(taking into account fee waivers and expense reimbursements) and
Subaccount expenses for the fiscal year preceding the date of the
proposed Substitutions. In addition, for twenty-four months following
the proposed Substitutions, Ameritas and Ameritas Investment will not
increase separate account fees or charges for Contracts outstanding on
the date of the proposed Substitutions.
Applicants' Legal Analysis
1. Section 26(c) of the 1940 Act provides, in pertinent part, that
``it shall be unlawful for any depositor or trustee of a registered
unit investment trust holding the security of a single issuer to
substitute another security for such security unless the Commission
shall have approved such substitution.'' Section 26(c) of the 1940 Act
also provides that the Commission shall issue an order approving such
substitutions if the evidence establishes that the substitutions are
consistent with the protection of investors and the purposes fairly
intended by the policies and provisions of the 1940 Act.
2. The Contracts expressly reserve to Ameritas the right, subject
to compliance with applicable law, to substitute shares of another
investment company for shares of an investment company held by a
Subaccount of the Separate Accounts. Applicants assert that the
prospectuses for the Contracts and the Separate Accounts contain
appropriate disclosure of this right.
3. In each case, Applicants believe that it is in the best
interests of the Contract Owners to substitute the Replacement Fund for
the Substituted Fund. In this regard, Applicants contend that the
proposed Replacement Fund for each Substituted Fund has an investment
objective that is at least substantially similar to that of the
Substituted Fund. Applicants also assert that the principal investment
policies of the Replacement Funds are similar to those of the
corresponding Substituted Funds. In addition, with respect to each
proposed substitution, Applicants note that affected Contract Owners
with balances invested in the Replacement Fund will have a lower or the
same expense ratio in all cases.
4. Applicants anticipate that Contract Owners will be better off
with the array of Subaccounts offered after the proposed Substitutions
than they have been with the array of Subaccounts offered prior to the
Substitutions. The proposed Substitutions retain for Contract Owners
the investment flexibility which is a central feature of the Contracts.
If the proposed Substitutions are carried out, all Contract Owners will
be permitted to allocate purchase payment and transfer Contract values
and cash values between and among approximately the same number of
Subaccounts as they could before the proposed Substitutions. Moreover,
the elimination of the costs of printing and mailing prospectuses and
periodic reports of the Substituted Funds will benefit Contract Owners.
5. Applicants note that Contract Owners who do not wish to
participate in a Replacement Fund will have an opportunity to
reallocate their accumulated value among other available Subaccounts
without the imposition of any charge or limitation (other than with
respect to ``market timing'' activity).
6. Applicants assert that, for the reasons summarized above, the
proposed Substitutions and related transactions meet the standards of
Section 26(c) of the 1940 Act and that the requested order should be
granted.
7. Sections 17(a)(1) and (2) of the 1940 Act prohibit an affiliated
person of a registered investment company, or affiliated persons of any
such affiliated person, or any principal underwriter for such company
(collectively, ``Transaction Affiliates'') from selling a security to,
or purchasing a security from, the registered investment company.
Applicants may be deemed to be Transaction Affiliates of one another
based upon the definition of ``affiliated person'' under Section
2(a)(3) of the 1940 Act. Because the Substitutions may be effected, in
whole or in part, by means of in-kind redemptions and purchases, the
Substitutions may be deemed to involve one or more purchases or sales
of securities or property between Transaction Affiliates.
8. Section 17(b) provides that the Commission may grant an
application exempting proposed transactions from the prohibitions of
Section 17(a) if the terms of the proposed transaction are reasonable
and fair and do not involve overreaching on the part of any person
concerned; the transaction is consistent with the investment policies
of each registered investment company concerned; and the transaction is
consistent with the general purposes of the Act. Applicants state that
the consideration to be paid by the Replacement Fund, and each of the
Substituted Funds, will be fair and reasonable and will not involve
overreaching because the Substitutions will not result in the dilution
of the interests of any affected Contract Owners and will not effect
any change in economic interest, Contract value or the dollar value of
any variable contract held by an affected Contract Owner.
9. In addition, Applicants state that to the extent the
Substitutions are effected by redeeming shares of the Substituted Funds
and using the redemption proceeds to purchase shares of the Replacement
Funds, the Substitutions will satisfy each of the procedural safeguards
adopted by the Board of Directors responsible for each of the Ameritas
Portfolios and the Substituted Funds, respectively under Rule 17a-7
under the 1940 Act.
Applicants' Conclusion
Applicants assert that for the reasons summarized above the
proposed substitutions and transactions meet the standards of Section
26(c) of the Act and are consistent with the standards of
[[Page 61854]]
Section 17(b) of the Act and that the requested orders should be
granted.
For the Commission, by the Division of Investment Management,
pursuant to delegated authority.
Jonathan G. Katz,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. E5-5944 Filed 10-25-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8010-01-P