Certain Large Diameter Carbon and Alloy Seamless Standard, Line, and Pressure Pipe from Japan: Notice of Rescission of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review, 61252-61253 [E5-5828]

Download as PDF 61252 Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 203 / Friday, October 21, 2005 / Notices these reviews in part. Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.213(d)(1), the Department is rescinding the reviews of the order on ball bearings from the United Kingdom which were produced or exported by NSK and the order on ball bearings from Japan which were produced or exported by Asahi during the period May 1, 2004, through May 30, 2005. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Notification Regarding APOs Background Dunyako Ahmadu, Fred Aziz, Jeff Frank, or Thomas Schauer, Import Administration, International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution Avenue, N.W., Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482–4733. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This notice also serves as a reminder to parties subject to administrative protective orders (APO) of their responsibility concerning the return or destruction of proprietary information disclosed under APO in accordance with 19 CFR 351.305, which continues to govern business proprietary information in this segment of these proceedings. Timely written notification of the return/destruction of APO materials or conversion to judicial protective order is hereby requested. Failure to comply with the regulations and terms of an APO is a violation which is subject to sanction. This notice is published in accordance with section 777(i) of the Act and 19 CFR 351.213(d)(4). 15:13 Oct 20, 2005 Jkt 208001 PO 00000 Frm 00009 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 Company Margin (percent) NPB .............................. NSK Ltd. ....................... On September 16, 2005, the Department of Commerce (the Department) published in the Federal Register the final results of the administrative reviews of the antidumping duty orders on ball bearings and parts thereof (ball bearings) from France, Germany, Italy, Japan, Singapore, and the United Kingdom (70 FR 54711) (Final Results). We received timely allegations of ministerial errors from Nippon Pillow Block Co., Ltd., (NPB), NSK Ltd. (NSK), NTN Corporation (NTN), and Nankai Seiko Co. Ltd. (SMT). In its comments dated September 16, 2005, NSK alleged that the Department erred in that it inadvertently assigned the incorrect level of trade for certain home–market Dated: October 17, 2005. sales. We agree with the alleged error Gary Taverman, and have amended the final results to Acting Deputy Assistant Secretaryfor Import correct the error. Administration. In its comments dated September 19, [FR Doc. E5–5829 Filed 10–20–05; 8:45 am] 2005, NPB alleged that the Department BILLING CODE 3510–DS–S erred in that it inadvertently used the incorrect code to designate housed bearings sold in the United States. We DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE agree with the alleged error and have amended the final results to correct the International Trade Administration error. [A–427–801, A–428–801, A–475–801, A–588– In its comments dated September 19, 804, A–559–801, A–412–801] 2005, NTN alleged that the Department should correct the draft liquidation Notice of Amended Final Results of instructions it prepared for NTN to Antidumping Duty Administrative reflect the correct importer of record. Reviews: Ball Bearings and Parts Although we agree with the alleged Thereof from Japan error and have corrected the draft AGENCY: Import Administration, liquidation instructions accordingly, International Trade Administration, this error does not affect our calculation Department of Commerce. of NTN’s margin. SUMMARY: On September 16, 2005, the In its comments dated September 19, Department of Commerce published in 2005, SMT alleged that the Department the Federal Register the final results of made a ministerial error by treating the administrative reviews of the contemporaneity as a more important antidumping duty orders on ball tie–breaker than the difference–inbearings and parts thereof from France, merchandise adjustment. We do not Germany, Italy, Japan, Singapore, and agree that we made an error. the United Kingdom. The period of Furthermore, SMT’s comments of an review is May 1, 2003, through April 30, alleged error were not ministerial in 2004. Based on the correction of certain nature as defined by 19 CFR ministerial errors, we have changed the § 351.225(f). Therefore, we have not margins for Nippon Pillow Block Co., changed our calculation of SMT’s Ltd., and NSK Ltd. for the margin. For a complete discussion of administrative review of ball bearings our response to SMT’s allegation, please and parts thereof from Japan. see the memorandum to Laurie Parkhill dated October 14, 2005. EFFECTIVE DATE: October 21, 2005. VerDate Aug<31>2005 Amended Final Results of Review As a result of the correction of clerical errors, the following weighted–average margins exist for exports of ball bearings by NPB and NSK for the period May 1, 2003, through April 30, 2004: 23.57 8.25 The Department will determine, and the U.S. Bureau of Customs and Border Protection (CBP) shall assess antidumping duties on all appropriate entries. We will issue appropriate assessment instructions directly to CBP within 15 days of publication of these amended final results of review. Where the importer-/customer–specific assessment rate or amount is above de minimis, we will instruct CBP to assess duties on all entries of subject merchandise by that importer or for that customer. We will also direct CBP to collect cash deposits of estimated antidumping duties on all appropriate entries in accordance with the procedures discussed in the Final Results and at the rates as amended by this notice. The amended deposit requirements are effective for all shipments of the subject merchandise entered, or withdrawn from warehouse, for consumption on or after the date these amended final results are published in the Federal Register. We are issuing and publishing these determinations and notice in accordance with sections 751(a)(1) and 777(i) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, and 19 CFR § 351.224(e). Dated: October 14, 2005. Joseph A. Spetrini, Acting Assistant Secretaryfor Import Administration. [FR Doc. E5–5821 Filed 10–20–05; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 3510–DS–S DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE International Trade Administration [A–588–850] Certain Large Diameter Carbon and Alloy Seamless Standard, Line, and Pressure Pipe from Japan: Notice of Rescission of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review Import Administration, International Trade Administration, Department of Commerce. EFFECTIVE DATE: October 21, 2005. SUMMARY: On July 15, 2005, the Department of Commerce (the AGENCY: E:\FR\FM\21OCN1.SGM 21OCN1 Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 203 / Friday, October 21, 2005 / Notices Department) published in the Federal Register a notice announcing the initiation of an administrative review of the antidumping duty order on certain large diameter carbon and alloy seamless standard, line, and pressure pipe from Japan, covering the period June 1, 2004, through May 31, 2005. See Notice of Initiation of Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Administrative Reviews and Request for Revocation in Part 70 FR 42028 (July 15, 2005) (Initiation Notice). The review was requested by United States Steel Corporation (the petitioner). We are now rescinding this review as a result of the petitioner’s withdrawal of its request for an administrative review. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Constance Handley or David Layton, at (202) 482–0631 or (202) 482–0371, respectively, AD/CVD Operations Office 1, Import Administration, International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th Street & Constitution Avenue, NW, Washington, DC 20230. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Dated: October 14, 2005. Gary Taverman, Acting Deputy Assistant Secretaryfor Import Administration. [FR Doc. E5–5828 Filed 10–20–05; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 3510–DS–S Background In accordance with 19 CFR 351.213(b), on June 30, 2005, the petitioner requested an administrative review of the antidumping duty order for JFE Steel Corporation, Nippon Steel Corporation, NKK Tubes, and Sumitomo Metal Industries, Ltd. on certain large diameter carbon and alloy seamless standard, line, and pressure pipe from Japan. None of the respondents requested a review. On July 15, 2005, in accordance with 19 CFR 351.221(c)(1)(i), we published the initiation of an administrative review of this order for the period June 1, 2004, through May 31, 2005. See Initiation Notice. On September 20, 2005, the petitioner timely withdrew its request for an administrative review of certain large diameter carbon and alloy seamless standard, line, and pressure pipe from Japan. Rescission of Review The Department’s regulations at 351.213(d)(1) provide that the Department will rescind an administrative review if the party that requested the review withdraws its request for review within 90 days of the date of publication of the notice of initiation of the requested review, or withdraws its request at a later date if the Department determines that it is reasonable to extend the time limit for withdrawing the request. The petitioner withdrew its request within the 90-day period and was the only party to request this review. Accordingly, we are VerDate Aug<31>2005 rescinding this review. The Department will issue appropriate assessment instructions to U.S. Customs and Border Protection within 15 days of publication of this notice. This notice serves as a reminder to parties subject to administrative protective order (APO) of their responsibility concerning the disposition of proprietary information disclosed under APO in accordance with 19 CFR 351.305(a)(3). Timely written notification of the return or destruction of APO materials or conversion to judicial protective order is hereby requested. Failure to comply with the regulations and terms of an APO is a sanctionable violation. This notice is issued and published in accordance with 19 CFR 351.213(d)(4) and section 777(i)(1) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended. 15:13 Oct 20, 2005 Jkt 208001 DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE International Trade Administration [A–427–818] Notice of Amended Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review: Low Enriched Uranium from France Import Administration, International Trade Administration, Department of Commerce. SUMMARY: On September 14, 2005, the Department of Commerce (the Department) published the final results of its second administrative review of the antidumping duty order on low enriched uranium (LEU) from France for the period February 1, 2003, through January 31, 2004. See Notice of Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review: Low Enriched Uranium from France, 70 FR 54359 (September 14, 2005). On September 14, 2005, in accordance with 19 CFR 351.224(c)(2), we received timely filed ministerial error allegations from respondent, Eurodif S.A., Compagnie ´ ´ ` ´ Generale Des Matieres Nucleaires, S.A. and COGEMA, Inc. (collectively, Eurodif/COGEMA), and the United States Enrichment Corporation and USEC Inc. (collectively, USEC or the petitioner). On September 19, 2005, we received rebuttal comments from Eurodif/COGEMA and the petitioner. Based on our analysis of the parties’ AGENCY: PO 00000 Frm 00010 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 61253 comments, the Department has revised the antidumping duty margin for Eurodif/COGEMA. Accordingly, we are amending our final results. EFFECTIVE DATE: October 21, 2005. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Myrna Lobo or Elfi Blum, AD/CVD Operations, Office 6, Import Administration, International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th Street & Constitution Avenue, NW, Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482–2371 or (202) 482– 0197, respectively. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Scope of the Order The product covered by this order is all low enriched uranium (LEU). LEU is enriched uranium hexafluoride (UF6) with a U235 product assay of less than 20 percent that has not been converted into another chemical form, such as UO2, or fabricated into nuclear fuel assemblies, regardless of the means by which the LEU is produced (including LEU produced through the down– blending of highly enriched uranium). Certain merchandise is outside the scope of this order. Specifically, this order does not cover enriched uranium hexafluoride with a U235 assay of 20 percent or greater, also known as highly enriched uranium. In addition, fabricated LEU is not covered by the scope of this order. For purposes of this order, fabricated uranium is defined as enriched uranium dioxide (UO2), whether or not contained in nuclear fuel rods or assemblies. Natural uranium concentrates (U3O8) with a U235 concentration of no greater than 0.711 percent and natural uranium concentrates converted into uranium hexafluoride with a U235 concentration of no greater than 0.711 percent are not covered by the scope of this order. Also excluded from this order is LEU owned by a foreign utility end–user and imported into the United States by or for such end–user solely for purposes of conversion by a U.S. fabricator into uranium dioxide (UO2) and/or fabrication into fuel assemblies so long as the uranium dioxide and/or fuel assemblies deemed to incorporate such imported LEU (i) remain in the possession and control of the U.S. fabricator, the foreign end–user, or their designed transporter(s) while in U.S. customs territory, and (ii) are re– exported within eighteen (18) months of entry of the LEU for consumption by the end–user in a nuclear reactor outside the United States. Such entries must be accompanied by the certifications of the importer and end- user. E:\FR\FM\21OCN1.SGM 21OCN1

Agencies

[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 203 (Friday, October 21, 2005)]
[Notices]
[Pages 61252-61253]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E5-5828]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

International Trade Administration

[A-588-850]


Certain Large Diameter Carbon and Alloy Seamless Standard, Line, 
and Pressure Pipe from Japan: Notice of Rescission of Antidumping Duty 
Administrative Review

AGENCY: Import Administration, International Trade Administration, 
Department of Commerce.

EFFECTIVE DATE: October 21, 2005.
SUMMARY: On July 15, 2005, the Department of Commerce (the

[[Page 61253]]

Department) published in the Federal Register a notice announcing the 
initiation of an administrative review of the antidumping duty order on 
certain large diameter carbon and alloy seamless standard, line, and 
pressure pipe from Japan, covering the period June 1, 2004, through May 
31, 2005. See Notice of Initiation of Antidumping and Countervailing 
Duty Administrative Reviews and Request for Revocation in Part 70 FR 
42028 (July 15, 2005) (Initiation Notice). The review was requested by 
United States Steel Corporation (the petitioner). We are now rescinding 
this review as a result of the petitioner's withdrawal of its request 
for an administrative review.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Constance Handley or David Layton, at 
(202) 482-0631 or (202) 482-0371, respectively, AD/CVD Operations 
Office 1, Import Administration, International Trade Administration, 
U.S. Department of Commerce, 14\th\ Street & Constitution Avenue, NW, 
Washington, DC 20230.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Background

    In accordance with 19 CFR 351.213(b), on June 30, 2005, the 
petitioner requested an administrative review of the antidumping duty 
order for JFE Steel Corporation, Nippon Steel Corporation, NKK Tubes, 
and Sumitomo Metal Industries, Ltd. on certain large diameter carbon 
and alloy seamless standard, line, and pressure pipe from Japan. None 
of the respondents requested a review. On July 15, 2005, in accordance 
with 19 CFR 351.221(c)(1)(i), we published the initiation of an 
administrative review of this order for the period June 1, 2004, 
through May 31, 2005. See Initiation Notice. On September 20, 2005, the 
petitioner timely withdrew its request for an administrative review of 
certain large diameter carbon and alloy seamless standard, line, and 
pressure pipe from Japan.

Rescission of Review

    The Department's regulations at 351.213(d)(1) provide that the 
Department will rescind an administrative review if the party that 
requested the review withdraws its request for review within 90 days of 
the date of publication of the notice of initiation of the requested 
review, or withdraws its request at a later date if the Department 
determines that it is reasonable to extend the time limit for 
withdrawing the request. The petitioner withdrew its request within the 
90-day period and was the only party to request this review. 
Accordingly, we are rescinding this review. The Department will issue 
appropriate assessment instructions to U.S. Customs and Border 
Protection within 15 days of publication of this notice.
    This notice serves as a reminder to parties subject to 
administrative protective order (APO) of their responsibility 
concerning the disposition of proprietary information disclosed under 
APO in accordance with 19 CFR 351.305(a)(3). Timely written 
notification of the return or destruction of APO materials or 
conversion to judicial protective order is hereby requested. Failure to 
comply with the regulations and terms of an APO is a sanctionable 
violation.
    This notice is issued and published in accordance with 19 CFR 
351.213(d)(4) and section 777(i)(1) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as 
amended.

    Dated: October 14, 2005.
Gary Taverman,
Acting Deputy Assistant Secretaryfor Import Administration.
[FR Doc. E5-5828 Filed 10-20-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-S

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.