In the Matter of Certain Pool Cues With Self-Aligning Joint Assemblies and Components Thereof; Notice of Commission Decision to Review in Part an Initial Determination Finding No Violation of Section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930; Termination of Investigation, 61309-61310 [05-21108]
Download as PDF
<![CDATA[
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 203 / Friday, October 21, 2005 / Notices
Philips County
Pleasant Ridge Church, 381 E. Buffalo Rd.,
Phillipsburg, 05001204
Rooks County
St. Joseph Catholic Church, 105 N. Oak St.,
Damar, 05001203
[FR Doc. 05–21035 Filed 10–20–05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4312–51–M
INTERNATIONAL TRADE
COMMISSION
[Inv. No. 337–TA–545]
In the Matter of Certain Laminated
Floor Panels; Notice of a Commission
Determination Not To Review an Initial
Determination Amending the
Complaint and Notice of Investigation
International Trade
Commission.
ACTION: Notice.
AGENCY:
Notice is hereby given that
the U.S. International Trade
Commission has determined not to
review an initial determination (‘‘ID’’) of
the presiding administrative law judge
(‘‘ALJ’’) granting the motion of
complainants to amend the complaint
and notice of investigation.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Michael K. Haldenstein, Esq., Office of
the General Counsel, U.S. International
Trade Commission, 500 E Street, SW.,
Washington, DC 20436, telephone (202)
205–3041. Copies of the public version
of the ALJ’s ID and all other
nonconfidential documents filed in
connection with this investigation are or
will be available for inspection during
official business hours (8:45 a.m. to 5:15
p.m.) in the Office of the Secretary, U.S.
International Trade Commission, 500 E
Street, SW., Washington, DC 20436,
telephone 202–205–2000.
General information concerning the
Commission may also be obtained by
accessing its Internet server (https://
www.usitc.gov). The public record for
this investigation may be viewed on the
Commission’s electronic docket (EDIS–
ON–LINE) at https://edis.usitc.gov.
Hearing-impaired persons are advised
that information on this matter can be
obtained by contacting the
Commission’s TDD terminal on 202–
205–1810.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The
Commission instituted this investigation
on August 3, 2005, based on a complaint
filed by Unilin Beheer B.V. of the
Netherlands, Flooring Industries Ltd. of
Ireland, and Unilin Flooring N.C. LLC of
Thomasville, North Carolina, 70 FR
44694 (2005).
SUMMARY:
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:13 Oct 20, 2005
Jkt 208001
The complaint alleged violations of
section 337 in the importation into the
United States, the sale for importation,
and the sale within the United States
after importation of certain laminated
floor panels by reason of infringement of
one or more of claims 1, 14, 17, 19, 20,
21, 37, 52, 65, and 66 of U.S. Patent No.
6,006,486, claims 1, 2, 10, 13, 18, 19, 22,
23, 24, and 27 of U.S. Patent No.
6,490,836, and claims 1–6 of U.S. Patent
No. 6,874,292. The complaint further
alleged that an industry in the United
States exists as required by subsection
(a)(2) of section 337. The complainants
requested that the Commission issue a
general exclusion order and cease and
desist orders. The Commission named
as respondents 30 companies located in
Canada, China, Malaysia, and the
United States. Id. The ALJ has set
October 3, 2006, as the target date for
completion of the investigation.
The ALJ issued the subject ID on
September 19, 2005. The ID grants
complainants’ motion to add two
respondents, Jiangsu Qianfeng
Decoration Materials Co. Ltd. (QDM), of
Jiangsu, China, and Hansol Homedeco
(Hansol), of Seoul, South Korea. The ID
also grants complainants’ motion to add
infringement of claims 1, 5, 13, 17, 27
and 28 of U.S. Patent No. 6,928,779 (the
‘779 patent). The ‘779 patent was issued
on August 16, 2005. The ID also permits
the complainants to add information
concerning the existence of a domestic
industry to the complaint. The ALJ
states in the ID that ‘‘good cause’’ exists
to permit these amendments to the
complaint and notice of investigation
because additional information was
obtained by complainants after the
complaint was filed.
The Commission investigative
attorney supported the motion. No party
opposed the motion. No petitions for
review were filed.
This action is taken under the
authority of section 337 of the Tariff Act
of 1930, as amended, 19 U.S.C. 1337,
and Commission rule 210.42, 19 CFR
210.42.
Issued: October 17, 2005.
By order of the Commission.
Marilyn R. Abbott,
Secretary to the Commission.
[FR Doc. 05–21110 Filed 10–20–05; 8:45 am]
61309
INTERNATIONAL TRADE
COMMISSION
[Investigation No. 731–TA–841 (Review)]
Non-Frozen Concentrated Apple Juice
From China
Determination
On the basis of the record 1 developed
in the subject five-year review, the
United States International Trade
Commission (Commission) determines,2
pursuant to section 751(c) of the Tariff
Act of 1930 (19 U.S.C. 1675(c)) (the
Act), that revocation of the antidumping
duty order on non-frozen concentrated
apple juice from China would be likely
to lead to continuation or recurrence of
material injury to an industry in the
United States within a reasonably
foreseeable time.
Background
The Commission instituted this
review on May 2, 2005 (70 FR 22694)
and determined on August 5, 2005 that
it would conduct an expedited review
(70 FR 51365, August 30, 2005).
The Commission transmitted its
determination in this review to the
Secretary of Commerce on September
28, 2005. The views of the Commission
are contained in USITC Publication
3799 (September 2005), entitled NonFrozen Concentrated Apple Juice from
China: Investigation No. 731–TA–841
(Review).
Issued: October 18, 2005.
By order of the Commission.
Marilyn R. Abbott,
Secretary to the Commission.
[FR Doc. 05–21109 Filed 10–20–05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7020–02–P
INTERNATIONAL TRADE
COMMISSION
[Investigation No. 337–TA–536]
In the Matter of Certain Pool Cues With
Self-Aligning Joint Assemblies and
Components Thereof; Notice of
Commission Decision to Review in
Part an Initial Determination Finding
No Violation of Section 337 of the Tariff
Act of 1930; Termination of
Investigation
U.S. International Trade
Commission.
ACTION: Notice.
AGENCY:
BILLING CODE 7020–02–P
PO 00000
1 The record is defined in § 207.2(f) of the
Commission’s Rules of Practice and Procedure (19
CFR 207.2(f)).
2 Commissioner Shara L. Aranoff did not
participate in this determination.
Frm 00066
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
E:\FR\FM\21OCN1.SGM
21OCN1
61310
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 203 / Friday, October 21, 2005 / Notices
SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that
the U.S. International Trade
Commission has determined to review
in part an initial determination (‘‘ID’’) of
the presiding administrative law judge
(‘‘ALJ’’) finding no violation of section
337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as
amended, in the above-captioned
investigation. The Commission
determined on review to decline to
reach the issue of whether one claim
term was met by the accused pool cues.
The Commission has determined not to
review the ALJ’s determination that one
other limitation of the claims at issue is
not met by the accused products. The
investigation is therefore terminated
with a finding of no violation.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Michael K. Haldenstein, Esq., Office of
the General Counsel, U.S. International
Trade Commission, 500 E Street, SW.,
Washington, DC 20436, telephone (202)
205–3041. Copies of the public version
of the ALJ’s ID and all other
nonconfidential documents filed in
connection with this investigation are or
will be available for inspection during
official business hours (8:45 a.m. to 5:15
p.m.) in the Office of the Secretary, U.S.
International Trade Commission, 500 E
Street, SW., Washington, DC 20436,
telephone 202–205–2000.
General information concerning the
Commission may also be obtained by
accessing its Internet server (https://
www.usitc.gov). The public record for
this investigation may be viewed on the
Commission’s electronic docket (EDISON-LINE) at https://edis.usitc.gov.
Hearing-impaired persons are advised
that information on this matter can be
obtained by contacting the
Commission’s TDD terminal on (202)
205–1810.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The
Commission instituted the abovereferenced investigation under section
337 of the Tariff Act of 1930 on April
4, 2005, based on a complaint filed by
J. Pechauer Custom Cues, Inc.
(‘‘Pechauer’’) of Green Bay, Wisconsin.
70 FR 7112. The complaint alleged
infringement of U.S. Patent No.
6,582,317 (the ‘317 patent), in the
importation, sale for importation, and
sale within the United States after
importation of certain pool cues covered
by all 29 claims of the ‘317 patent. The
Commission named the following
companies as respondents in the
investigation: Kaokao Industrial Co.
LTD., aka Kaokao (Zhang Zhou) Sports
(‘‘Kao Kao’’) Equipment Co. Ltd. of
Taiwan; CueStix International of
Lafayette, Colorado; Sterling Gaming of
Matthews, North Carolina; CueSight of
Matthews, North Carolina; Imperial
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:13 Oct 20, 2005
Jkt 208001
International of Hasbrouck Heights,
New Jersey; Sigel’s Unlimited Cues &
Accessories of Winter Garden, Florida;
Nick Varner Cues and Cases of
Owensboro, Kentucky; J–S Sales Co. Inc.
of Elmsford, New York; and GLD
Products of Muskego, Wisconsin.
On September 1, 2005, the ALJ issued
an ID (Order No. 5) granting Kao Kao’s
motion for summary determination of
noninfringement and finding that Kao
Kao’s accused pool cues do not satisfy
two limitations of the two independent
claims of the ‘317 patent. On September
7, 2005, complainant Pechauer filed a
petition for review of the ALJ’s ID, and
on September 19, 2005, the Commission
Investigative Attorney and Kao Kao filed
oppositions to Pechauer’s petition for
review. On September 22, 2005, the
Commission extended the time for
deciding whether to review the ID until
October 17, 2005.
Having examined the record in this
investigation, including the ID, the
petition for review, and the responses
thereto, the Commission has determined
not to review the portion of the ID
concerning the ‘‘slightly threaded
anterior portion’’ limitation. The
Commission has determined to review,
and on review, to decline to reach the
issue of whether the accused pool cues
meet the ‘‘closed posterior end’’
limitation. Accordingly, the
investigation is terminated with a
finding of no violation.
This action is taken under the
authority of section 337 of the Tariff Act
of 1930, as amended (19 U.S.C. 1337),
and in sections 210.42 of the
Commission’s Rules of Practice and
Procedure (19 CFR 210.42).
By order of the Commission.
Issued: October 18, 2005.
Marilyn R. Abbott,
Secretary to the Commission.
[FR Doc. 05–21108 Filed 10–20–05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7020–02–P
DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
Drug Enforcement Administration
[Docket No. DEA–270P]
Controlled Substances: Proposed
Aggregate Production Quotas for 2006
Drug Enforcement
Administration (DEA), Justice.
ACTION: Notice of proposed year 2006
aggregate production quotas.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: This notice proposes initial
year 2006 aggregate production quotas
for controlled substances in Schedules I
PO 00000
Frm 00067
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
and II of the Controlled Substances Act
(CSA).
DATES: Comments or objections must be
received on or before November 14,
2005.
ADDRESSES: To ensure proper handling
of comments, please reference ‘‘Docket
No. DEA–270P’’ on all written and
electronic correspondence. Written
comments being sent via regular mail
should be sent to the Deputy Assistant
Administrator, Office of Diversion
Control, Drug Enforcement
Administration, Washington, DC 20537,
Attention: DEA Federal Register
Representative/ODL. Written comments
sent via express mail should be sent to
DEA Headquarters, Attention: DEA
Federal Register Representative/ODL,
2401 Jefferson-Davis Highway,
Alexandria, VA 22301. Comments may
be directly sent to DEA electronically by
sending an electronic message to
dea.diversion.policy@usdoj.gov.
Comments may also be sent
electronically through https://
www.regulations.gov using the
electronic comment form provided on
that site. An electronic copy of this
document is also available at the
https://www.regulations.gov Web site.
DEA will accept attachments to
electronic comments in Microsoft Word,
WordPerfect, Adobe PDF, or Excel file
formats only. DEA will not accept any
file format other than those specifically
listed here.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Christine A. Sannerud, Ph.D., Chief,
Drug and Chemical Evaluation Section,
Drug Enforcement Administration,
Washington, DC 20537, Telephone:
(202) 307–7183.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Section
306 of the CSA (21 U.S.C. 826) requires
that the Attorney General establish
aggregate production quotas for each
basic class of controlled substance listed
in Schedules I and II. This
responsibility has been delegated to the
Administrator of the DEA by section
0.100 of Title 28 of the Code of Federal
Regulations. The Administrator, in turn,
has redelegated this function to the
Deputy Administrator, pursuant to
section 0.104 of Title 28 of the Code of
Federal Regulations.
The proposed year 2006 aggregate
production quotas represent those
quantities of controlled substances that
may be produced in the United States in
2006 to provide adequate supplies of
each substance for: The estimated
medical, scientific, research, and
industrial needs of the United States;
lawful export requirements; and the
establishment and maintenance of
reserve stocks. These quotas do not
E:\FR\FM\21OCN1.SGM
21OCN1
]]>Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 203 (Friday, October 21, 2005)]
[Notices]
[Pages 61309-61310]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-21108]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION
[Investigation No. 337-TA-536]
In the Matter of Certain Pool Cues With Self-Aligning Joint
Assemblies and Components Thereof; Notice of Commission Decision to
Review in Part an Initial Determination Finding No Violation of Section
337 of the Tariff Act of 1930; Termination of Investigation
AGENCY: U.S. International Trade Commission.
ACTION: Notice.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
[[Page 61310]]
SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that the U.S. International Trade
Commission has determined to review in part an initial determination
(``ID'') of the presiding administrative law judge (``ALJ'') finding no
violation of section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, in the
above-captioned investigation. The Commission determined on review to
decline to reach the issue of whether one claim term was met by the
accused pool cues. The Commission has determined not to review the
ALJ's determination that one other limitation of the claims at issue is
not met by the accused products. The investigation is therefore
terminated with a finding of no violation.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Michael K. Haldenstein, Esq., Office
of the General Counsel, U.S. International Trade Commission, 500 E
Street, SW., Washington, DC 20436, telephone (202) 205-3041. Copies of
the public version of the ALJ's ID and all other nonconfidential
documents filed in connection with this investigation are or will be
available for inspection during official business hours (8:45 a.m. to
5:15 p.m.) in the Office of the Secretary, U.S. International Trade
Commission, 500 E Street, SW., Washington, DC 20436, telephone 202-205-
2000.
General information concerning the Commission may also be obtained
by accessing its Internet server (https://www.usitc.gov). The public
record for this investigation may be viewed on the Commission's
electronic docket (EDIS-ON-LINE) at https://edis.usitc.gov. Hearing-
impaired persons are advised that information on this matter can be
obtained by contacting the Commission's TDD terminal on (202) 205-1810.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Commission instituted the above-
referenced investigation under section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930 on
April 4, 2005, based on a complaint filed by J. Pechauer Custom Cues,
Inc. (``Pechauer'') of Green Bay, Wisconsin. 70 FR 7112. The complaint
alleged infringement of U.S. Patent No. 6,582,317 (the `317 patent), in
the importation, sale for importation, and sale within the United
States after importation of certain pool cues covered by all 29 claims
of the `317 patent. The Commission named the following companies as
respondents in the investigation: Kaokao Industrial Co. LTD., aka
Kaokao (Zhang Zhou) Sports (``Kao Kao'') Equipment Co. Ltd. of Taiwan;
CueStix International of Lafayette, Colorado; Sterling Gaming of
Matthews, North Carolina; CueSight of Matthews, North Carolina;
Imperial International of Hasbrouck Heights, New Jersey; Sigel's
Unlimited Cues & Accessories of Winter Garden, Florida; Nick Varner
Cues and Cases of Owensboro, Kentucky; J-S Sales Co. Inc. of Elmsford,
New York; and GLD Products of Muskego, Wisconsin.
On September 1, 2005, the ALJ issued an ID (Order No. 5) granting
Kao Kao's motion for summary determination of noninfringement and
finding that Kao Kao's accused pool cues do not satisfy two limitations
of the two independent claims of the `317 patent. On September 7, 2005,
complainant Pechauer filed a petition for review of the ALJ's ID, and
on September 19, 2005, the Commission Investigative Attorney and Kao
Kao filed oppositions to Pechauer's petition for review. On September
22, 2005, the Commission extended the time for deciding whether to
review the ID until October 17, 2005.
Having examined the record in this investigation, including the ID,
the petition for review, and the responses thereto, the Commission has
determined not to review the portion of the ID concerning the
``slightly threaded anterior portion'' limitation. The Commission has
determined to review, and on review, to decline to reach the issue of
whether the accused pool cues meet the ``closed posterior end''
limitation. Accordingly, the investigation is terminated with a finding
of no violation.
This action is taken under the authority of section 337 of the
Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (19 U.S.C. 1337), and in sections 210.42
of the Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure (19 CFR 210.42).
By order of the Commission.
Issued: October 18, 2005.
Marilyn R. Abbott,
Secretary to the Commission.
[FR Doc. 05-21108 Filed 10-20-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7020-02-P
