Proposed Collection; Comment Request, 60575 [E5-5724]
Download as PDF
<![CDATA[
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 200 / Tuesday, October 18, 2005 / Notices
Bias uncertainty: a measure of both the
accuracy and precision of the calculations
and the uncertainty in the experimental data.
Calculational method: includes the
hardware platform, operating system,
computer algorithms and methods, nuclear
reaction data, and methods used to construct
computer models.
Critical experiment: a fissionable system
that has been experimentally determined to
be critical (with keff ≈ 1).
Margin of safety: the difference between
the actual value of a parameter and the value
of the parameter at which the system is
expected to be critical with critical defined
as keff = 1 = bias = bias uncertainty.
Margin of subcriticality (MoS): the
difference between the actual value of keff
and the value of keff at which the system is
expected to be critical with critical defined
as keff = 1 = bias = bias uncertainty.
Minimum margin of subcriticality (MMS): a
minimum allowed margin of subcriticality,
which is an allowance for any unknown
uncertainties in calculating keff.
Subcritical limit: the bounding value of a
controlled parameter under normal case
conditions.
Upper subcritical limit (USL): the
maximum allowed value of keff (including
uncertainty in keff), under both normal and
credible abnormal conditions, including
allowance for the bias, the bias uncertainty,
and a minimum margin of subcriticality.
[FR Doc. 05–20785 Filed 10–17–05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7590–01–P
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
COMMISSION
Proposed Collection; Comment
Request
Upon Written Request, Copies Available
From: Securities and Exchange
Commission, Office of Filings and
Information Services, Washington, DC
20549.
Extension:
Regulation BTR; OMB Control No. 3235–
0579; SEC File No. 270–521.
Notice is hereby given that pursuant
to the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995
(44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.), the Securities
and Exchange Commission
(‘‘Commission’’) is soliciting comments
on the collection of information
summarized below. The Commission
plans to submit this existing collection
of information to the Office of
Management and Budget for extension
and approval.
Regulation Blackout Trade Restriction
(‘‘Regulation BTR’’) clarifies the scope
and application of Section 306(a) of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (‘‘Act’’).
Section 306(a)(6) of the Act requires an
issuer to provide timely notice to its
directors and executive officers and to
the Commission of the imposition of a
blackout period that would trigger the
VerDate Aug<31>2005
17:22 Oct 17, 2005
Jkt 208001
statutory trading prohibition of Section
306(a)(1). Approximately 1,230 issuers
file Regulation BTR notices annually.
We estimate that it takes 2 hours per
response for an issuer to draft a notice
to directors and executive officers for a
total annual burden of 2,460 hours. The
issuer prepares 75% of the 2,460 annual
burden hours for a total reporting
burden of (1,230 × 2 × .75) 1,845 hours.
In addition, we estimate that an issuer
distributes a notice to five directors and
executive officers at an estimated 5
minutes per notice (1,230 blackout
period × 5 notices × 5 minutes) for a
total reporting burden of 512 hours. The
combined annual reporting burden is
(1,845 hours + 512 hours) 2,357 hours.
Written comments are invited on: (a)
Whether this collection of information
is necessary for the proper performance
of the functions of the agency, including
whether the information will have
practical utility; (b) the accuracy of the
agency’s estimate of the burden of the
collections of information; (c) ways to
enhance the quality, utility, and clarity
of the information collected; and (d)
ways to minimize the burden of the
collection of information on
respondents, including through the use
of automated collection techniques or
other forms of information technology.
Consideration will be given to
comments and suggestions submitted in
writing within 60 days of this
publication.
Please direct your written comments
to R. Corey Booth, Director/Chief
Information Officer, Office of
Information Technology, Securities and
Exchange Commission, 100 F Street,
NE., Washington, DC 20549.
Dated: October 7, 2005.
Jill M. Peterson,
Assistant Secretary.
[FR Doc. E5–5722 Filed 10–17–05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8010–01–P
60575
(‘‘Commission’’) is soliciting comments
on the collection of information
summarized below. The Commission
plans to submit this existing collection
of information to the Office of
Management and Budget for extension
and approval.
Regulation G under the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 (the ‘‘Exchange
Act’’) requires registrants that publicly
disclose material information that
includes a non-GAAP financial measure
to provide a reconciliation to the most
directly comparable GAAP financial
measure. Regulation G implemented the
requirements of Section 401 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. We
estimate that approximately 14,000
public companies must comply with
Regulation G approximately six times a
year for a total of 84,000 responses
annually. We estimated that it takes
approximately .5 hours per response
(84,000 × .5 hours) for a total reporting
burden of 42,000 hours annually.
Written comments are invited on: (a)
Whether this collection of information
is necessary for the proper performance
of the functions of the agency, including
whether the information will have
practical utility; (b) the accuracy of the
agency’s estimate of the burden of the
collections of information; (c) ways to
enhance the quality, utility, and clarity
of the information collected; and (d)
ways to minimize the burden of the
collection of information on
respondents, including through the use
of automated collection techniques or
other forms of information technology.
Consideration will be given to
comments and suggestions submitted in
writing within 60 days of this
publication.
Please direct your written comments
to R. Corey Booth, Director/Chief
Information Officer, Office of
Information Technology, Securities and
Exchange Commission, 100 F Street,
NE., Washington, DC 20549.
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
COMMISSION
Proposed Collection; Comment
Request
Dated: October 7, 2005.
Jill M. Peterson,
Assistant Secretary.
[FR Doc. E5–5724 Filed 10–17–05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8010–01–P
Upon Written Request, Copies Available
From: Securities and Exchange
Commission, Office of Filings and
Information Services, Washington, DC
20549.
Extension:
Regulation G; OMB Control No. 3235–
0576; SEC File No. 270–518.
Notice is hereby given that pursuant
to the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995
(44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.), the Securities
and Exchange Commission
PO 00000
Frm 00091
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
COMMISSION
Proposed Collection; Comment
Request
Upon Written Request, Copies Available
From: Securities and Exchange
Commission, Office of Filings and
Information Services, Washington, DC
20549.
Extension:
E:\FR\FM\18OCN1.SGM
18OCN1
]]>Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 200 (Tuesday, October 18, 2005)]
[Notices]
[Page 60575]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E5-5724]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Proposed Collection; Comment Request
Upon Written Request, Copies Available From: Securities and Exchange
Commission, Office of Filings and Information Services, Washington, DC
20549.
Extension:
Regulation G; OMB Control No. 3235-0576; SEC File No. 270-518.
Notice is hereby given that pursuant to the Paperwork Reduction Act
of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.), the Securities and Exchange
Commission (``Commission'') is soliciting comments on the collection of
information summarized below. The Commission plans to submit this
existing collection of information to the Office of Management and
Budget for extension and approval.
Regulation G under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the
``Exchange Act'') requires registrants that publicly disclose material
information that includes a non-GAAP financial measure to provide a
reconciliation to the most directly comparable GAAP financial measure.
Regulation G implemented the requirements of Section 401 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. We estimate that approximately 14,000
public companies must comply with Regulation G approximately six times
a year for a total of 84,000 responses annually. We estimated that it
takes approximately .5 hours per response (84,000 x .5 hours) for a
total reporting burden of 42,000 hours annually.
Written comments are invited on: (a) Whether this collection of
information is necessary for the proper performance of the functions of
the agency, including whether the information will have practical
utility; (b) the accuracy of the agency's estimate of the burden of the
collections of information; (c) ways to enhance the quality, utility,
and clarity of the information collected; and (d) ways to minimize the
burden of the collection of information on respondents, including
through the use of automated collection techniques or other forms of
information technology. Consideration will be given to comments and
suggestions submitted in writing within 60 days of this publication.
Please direct your written comments to R. Corey Booth, Director/
Chief Information Officer, Office of Information Technology, Securities
and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street, NE., Washington, DC 20549.
Dated: October 7, 2005.
Jill M. Peterson,
Assistant Secretary.
[FR Doc. E5-5724 Filed 10-17-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8010-01-P
