Explanation of Commission Determination on Adequacy in Paper Clips From China, 60559-60560 [05-20798]

Download as PDF Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 200 / Tuesday, October 18, 2005 / Notices reviews by November 17, 2005. However, should the Department of Commerce extend the time limit for its completion of the final results of its reviews, the deadline for comments (which may not contain new factual information) on Commerce’s final results is three business days after the issuance of Commerce’s results. If comments contain business proprietary information (BPI), they must conform with the requirements of sections 201.6, 207.3, and 207.7 of the Commission’s rules. The Commission’s rules do not authorize filing of submissions with the Secretary by facsimile or electronic means, except to the extent permitted by section 201.8 of the Commission’s rules, as amended, 67 FR 68036 (November 8, 2002). Even where electronic filing of a document is permitted, certain documents must also be filed in paper form, as specified in II (C) of the Commission’s Handbook on Electronic Filing Procedures, 67 FR 68168, 68173 (November 8, 2002). In accordance with sections 201.16(c) and 207.3 of the rules, each document filed by a party to the reviews must be served on all other parties to the reviews (as identified by either the public or BPI service list), and a certificate of service must be timely filed. The Secretary will not accept a document for filing without a certificate of service. Determinations.—The Commission has determined to exercise its authority to extend the review period by up to 90 days pursuant to 19 U.S.C. 1675(c)(5)(B). Authority: These reviews are being conducted under authority of title VII of the Tariff Act of 1930; this notice is published pursuant to section 207.62 of the Commission’s rules. Issued: October 12, 2005. By order of the Commission. Marilyn R. Abbott, Secretary to the Commission. [FR Doc. 05–20799 Filed 10–17–05; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 7020–02–P INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION [Inv. No. 337–TA–544] In the Matter of Certain Hand-Held Mobile Computer Devices, Components Thereof and Cradles Therefor; Notice of Decision Not To Review an Initial Determination Terminating the Investigation Based on Withdrawal of the Complaint International Trade Commission. ACTION: Notice. AGENCY: VerDate Aug<31>2005 17:22 Oct 17, 2005 Jkt 208001 SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that the U.S. International Trade Commission has determined not to review an initial determination (‘‘ID’’) issued by the presiding administrative law judge (‘‘ALJ’’) on September 26, 2005, terminating the investigation based on withdrawal of the complaint. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Michael Liberman, Esq., Office of the General Counsel, U.S. International Trade Commission, 500 E Street, SW., Washington, DC 20436, telephone 202– 205–3115. Copies of the public version of the IDs and all nonconfidential documents filed in connection with this investigation are or will be available for inspection during official business hours (8:45 a.m. to 5:15 p.m.) in the Office of the Secretary, U.S. International Trade Commission, 500 E Street, SW., Washington, DC 20436, telephone 202–205–2000. Hearingimpaired persons are advised that information on this matter can be obtained by contacting the Commission’s TDD terminal on 202– 205–1810. General information concerning the Commission may also be obtained by accessing its Internet server (https://www.usitc.gov). The public record for this investigation may be viewed on the Commission’s electronic docket (EDIS) at https://edis.usitc.gov. On August 3, 2005, the Commission instituted an investigation under section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, 19 U.S.C. 1337, based on a complaint filed by Intermec Technologies Corporation of Everett, Washington, alleging a violation of section 337 in the importation, sale for importation, and sale within the United States after importation of certain handheld mobile computing devices, components thereof and cradles therefor by reason of infringement of claims 62, 66, 67, 71, 126, and 130–132 of U.S. Patent No. 5,410,141; claims 1–3 of U.S. Patent No. 5,468,947; and claims 17–25 and 27–31 of U.S. Patent No. 6,375,344. 70 FR 44693 (August 3, 2005). The complainant named Symbol Technologies, Inc. and Symbol de Mexico, Sociedad de R.I. de C.V. as respondents. On September 9, 2005, the complainant and respondents jointly moved to terminate the investigation based on withdrawal of the complaint and suspend the procedural schedule. On September 21, 2005, the Commission investigative attorney filed a response in support of the joint motion. On September 26, 2005, the ALJ issued an ID (Order No. 5) granting the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: PO 00000 Frm 00075 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 60559 joint motion to terminate. No party petitioned for review of the ALJ’s ID. The authority for the Commission’s determination is contained in section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (19 U.S.C. 1337), and in section 210.42 of the Commission’s Rules of Practice and Procedure (19 CFR 210.42). Issued: October 12, 2005. By order of the Commission. Marilyn R. Abbott, Secretary to the Commission. [FR Doc. 05–20797 Filed 10–17–05; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 7020–02–P INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION [Inv. No. 731–TA–663 (Second Review)] Explanation of Commission Determination on Adequacy in Paper Clips From China On October 4, 2005, the Commission unanimously determined that it should proceed to an expedited review in the subject five-year review pursuant to section 751(c)(3)(B) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, 19 U.S.C. 1675(c)(3)(B). The Commission determined that the domestic interested party group response to the notice of institution was adequate. The Commission received responses to the notice of institution from two domestic producers, ACCO Brands USA LLC and Officemate International Corporation. Because the Commission received adequate responses from two producers representing the overwhelming majority of domestic production, the Commission determined that the domestic interested party group response was adequate. The Commission did not receive a response from any respondent interested party, and therefore determined that the respondent interested party group response to the notice of institution was inadequate. In the absence of an adequate respondent interested party group response, and any other circumstances that it deemed warranted proceeding to a full review, the Commission determined to conduct an expedited review. A record of the Commissioners’ votes is available from the Office of the Secretary and the Commission’s Web site (https:// www.usitc.gov). By order of the Commission. E:\FR\FM\18OCN1.SGM 18OCN1 60560 Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 200 / Tuesday, October 18, 2005 / Notices Issued: October 12, 2005. Marilyn R. Abbott, Secretary to the Commission. [FR Doc. 05–20798 Filed 10–17–05; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 7020–02–P DEPARTMENT OF LABOR Office of the Secretary Submission for OMB Review: Comment Request October 11, 2005. The Department of Labor (DOL) has submitted the following public information collection request (ICR) to the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) for review and approval in accordance with the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104–13, 44 U.S.C. Chapter 35). A copy of this ICR, with applicable supporting documentation, may be obtained by calling the Department of Labor. To obtain documentation contact Ira Mills on 202–693–4122 (this is not a toll-free number) or e-mail: Mills.Ira@dol.gov. Comments should be sent to Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs, Attn: OMB Desk Officer for ETA, Office of Management and Budget, Room 10235, Washington, DC 20503, 202– 395–7316 (this is not a toll free number), within 30 days from the date of this publication in the Federal Register. The OMB is particularly interested in comments which: • Evaluate whether the proposed collection of information is necessary for the proper performance of the functions of the agency, including whether the information will have practical utility; • Evaluate the accuracy of the agency’s estimate of the burden of the proposed collection of information, including the validity of the methodology and assumptions used; • Enhance the quality, utility and clarity of the information to be collected; and • Minimize the burden of the collection of information on those who are to respond, including through the use of appropriate automated, electronic, mechanical, or other technological collection techniques or other forms of information technology, e.g., permitting electronic submission of responses. Agency: Employment and Training Administration (ETA). Type of Review: Revision of a currently approved collection. Title: Petition for Trade Adjustment Assistance and Alternative Trade Adjustment Assistance. VerDate Aug<31>2005 17:22 Oct 17, 2005 Jkt 208001 OMB Number: 1205–0342. Frequency: On occasion. Affected Public: Individuals or households; Business or other for-profit; and State, Local or Tribal Government. Type of Response: Reporting. Number of Respondents: 3,030. Annual Responses: 3,030. Average Response time: 20 minutes per respondent and 5 minutes for State agency for each petition received. Total Annual Burden Hours: 1,263. Total Annualized Capital/Startup Costs: 0. Total Annual Costs (operating/ maintaining systems or purchasing services): 0. Description: Information on this form is required in order to make a determination on Trade Adjustment Assistance and Alternative Trade Adjustment Assistance petitions filed on behalf of service workers according to Section 223 of the Trade Act, as amended. Ira L. Mills, Departmental Clearance Officer. [FR Doc. 05–20724 Filed 10–17–05; 8:45 am] October 27, 2005 will be included in the record of the meeting. Individuals or representatives of organizations wishing to address the Advisory Council should forward their request to the Executive Secretary at the above address or via telephone at (202) 693–8668. Oral presentations will be limited to 10 minutes, but an extended statement may be submitted for the record. Individuals with disabilities who need special accommodations should contact Larry Good by October 27 at the address indicated in this notice. Signed at Washington, DC, this 12th day of October, 2005. Ann L. Combs, Assistant Secretary, Employee Benefits Security Administration. [FR Doc. 05–20722 Filed 10–17–05; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4510–29–P DEPARTMENT OF LABOR Employee Benefits Security Administration Employee Benefits Security Administration 132nd Plenary Meeting; Advisory Council on Employee Welfare and Pension Benefit Plans; Notice of Meeting Advisory Council on Employee Welfare and Pension Benefit Plans; Working Group on Retirement Plan Distributions and Options; Working Group on Communications to Retirement Plan Participants and Working Group on Improving Plan Communications for Health and Welfare Plan Participants; Notice of Meeting Pursuant to the authority contained in Section 512 of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (ERISA), 29 U.S.C. 1142, the 132nd open meeting of the full Advisory Council on Employee Welfare and Pension Benefit Plans will be held on November 3, 2005. The session will take place in Room S–2508, U.S. Department of Labor, 200 Constitution Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20210. The meeting will run from 9:30 a.m. to approximately 11:30 a.m. and, if necessary, from 1:30 p.m. to 3:30 p.m. The purpose of the open meeting is for the chairpersons of the three Working Groups to submit reports on their study topics for the full Advisory Council’s review and acceptance, and for the Council to present a summary of the reports to the Secretary of Labor. Organizations or members of the public wishing to submit a written statement pertaining to any topic under consideration by the Advisory Council may do so by submitting 20 copies to Larry Good, Executive Secretary, ERISA Advisory Council, U.S. Department of Labor, Room N–5623, 200 Constitution Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20210. Statements received on or before Pursuant to the authority contained in Section 512 of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (ERISA), 29 U.S.C. 1142, a public meeting will be held on November 2, 2005 of the Working Groups assigned by the Advisory Council on Employee Welfare and Pension Benefit Plans to study the issues of (1) Retirement plan distributions, (2) communications to retirement plan participants, and (3) improving plan communications for health and welfare plan participants. The sessions will take place in Room N S4215 B–C, U.S. Department of Labor, 200 Constitution Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20210. The purpose of the open meeting is for the Working Groups to conclude their report/ recommendations for the Secretary of Labor. The meetings will start at 9 a.m., with the Working Group on Retirement Plan Distributions and Options meeting first, followed by the Working Group on Communications to Retirement Plan Participants, and then the Working Group on Improving Plan Communications for Health and Welfare Plan Participants. This will be followed BILLING CODE 4510–30–P DEPARTMENT OF LABOR PO 00000 Frm 00076 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\18OCN1.SGM 18OCN1

Agencies

[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 200 (Tuesday, October 18, 2005)]
[Notices]
[Pages 60559-60560]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-20798]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION

[Inv. No. 731-TA-663 (Second Review)]


Explanation of Commission Determination on Adequacy in Paper 
Clips From China

    On October 4, 2005, the Commission unanimously determined that it 
should proceed to an expedited review in the subject five-year review 
pursuant to section 751(c)(3)(B) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, 
19 U.S.C. 1675(c)(3)(B).
    The Commission determined that the domestic interested party group 
response to the notice of institution was adequate. The Commission 
received responses to the notice of institution from two domestic 
producers, ACCO Brands USA LLC and Officemate International 
Corporation. Because the Commission received adequate responses from 
two producers representing the overwhelming majority of domestic 
production, the Commission determined that the domestic interested 
party group response was adequate.
    The Commission did not receive a response from any respondent 
interested party, and therefore determined that the respondent 
interested party group response to the notice of institution was 
inadequate. In the absence of an adequate respondent interested party 
group response, and any other circumstances that it deemed warranted 
proceeding to a full review, the Commission determined to conduct an 
expedited review. A record of the Commissioners' votes is available 
from the Office of the Secretary and the Commission's Web site (https://
www.usitc.gov).

    By order of the Commission.


[[Page 60560]]


    Issued: October 12, 2005.
Marilyn R. Abbott,
Secretary to the Commission.
[FR Doc. 05-20798 Filed 10-17-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7020-02-P
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.