In the Matter of Certain Network Controllers and Products Containing Same; Notice of Decision Not To Review an Initial Determination Granting Complainant's Motion To Terminate the Investigation Based on a Settlement Agreement, 60108-60109 [05-20571]

Download as PDF 60108 Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 198 / Friday, October 14, 2005 / Notices OMB Control Number: 1029–0107. Summary: States and Indian tribes having an approved reclamation plan may establish, administer and operate self-sustaining State and Indian Tribeadministered programs to insure private property against damages caused by land subsidence resulting from underground mining. States and Indian tribes interested in requesting monies for their insurance programs would apply to the Director of OSM. Bureau Form Number: None. Frequency of Collection: Once. Description of Respondents: States and Indian tribes with approved coal reclamation plans. Total Annual Responses: 1. Total Annual Burden Hours: 8. Total Annual Non-Wage Costs: $0. Send comments on the need for the collections of information for the performance of the functions of the agency; the accuracy of the agency’s burden estimates; ways to enhance the quality, utility and clarity of the information collections; and ways to minimize the information collection burdens on respondents, such as use of automated means of collections of the information, to the following addresses. Please refer to OMB control number 1029–0092 for Part 745 and 1029–0107 for Part 887 in your correspondence. Dated: June 28, 2005. John R. Craynon, Chief, Division of Regulatory Support. [FR Doc. 05–20574 Filed 10–13–05; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4310–05–M INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION [Investigation Nos. 701–TA–309–A and B (Second Review)] Magnesium From Canada United States International Trade Commission. ACTION: Notice of Commission determinations to conduct full five-year reviews concerning the countervailing duty orders on magnesium from Canada. AGENCY: SUMMARY: The Commission hereby gives notice that it will proceed with full reviews pursuant to section 751(c)(5) of the Tariff Act of 1930 (19 U.S.C. 1675(c)(5)) to determine whether revocation of the countervailing duty orders on magnesium from Canada would be likely to lead to continuation or recurrence of material injury within a reasonably foreseeable time. A schedule for the reviews will be established and announced at a later date. For further information concerning VerDate Aug<31>2005 13:54 Oct 13, 2005 Jkt 208001 the conduct of these reviews and rules of general application, consult the Commission’s Rules of Practice and Procedure, part 201, subparts A through E (19 CFR part 201), and part 207, subparts A, D, E, and F (19 CFR part 207). EFFECTIVE DATE: October 4, 2005. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mary Messer (202–205–3193) Office of Investigations, U.S. International Trade Commission, 500 E Street, SW., Washington, DC 20436. Hearingimpaired persons can obtain information on this matter by contacting the Commission’s TDD terminal on 202– 205–1810. Persons with mobility impairments who will need special assistance in gaining access to the Commission should contact the Office of the Secretary at 202–205–2000. General information concerning the Commission may also be obtained by accessing its Internet server (https:// www.usitc.gov). The public record for these reviews may be viewed on the Commission’s electronic docket (EDIS) at https://edis.usitc.gov. On October 4, 2005, the Commission determined that it should proceed to full reviews in the subject five-year reviews pursuant to section 751(c)(5) of the Act. The Commission found that the domestic interested party group response to its notice of institution (70 FR 38199, July 1, 2005) was adequate, but found that the respondent interested party group response was inadequate. The Commission also found that other circumstances warranted conducting full reviews.1 A record of the Commissioners’ votes, the Commission’s statement on adequacy, and any individual Commissioner’s statements will be available from the Office of the Secretary and at the Commission’s Web site. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Authority: These reviews are being conducted under authority of title VII of the Tariff Act of 1930; this notice is published pursuant to section 207.62 of the Commission’s rules. By order of the Commission. Issued: October 11, 2005. Marilyn R. Abbott, Secretary to the Commission. [FR Doc. 05–20621 Filed 10–13–05; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 7020–02–P 1 Commissioner PO 00000 Frm 00049 Jennifer A. Hillman dissenting. Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION [Inv. No. 337–TA–531] In the Matter of Certain Network Controllers and Products Containing Same; Notice of Decision Not To Review an Initial Determination Granting Complainant’s Motion To Terminate the Investigation Based on a Settlement Agreement U.S. International Trade Commission. ACTION: Notice. AGENCY: SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that the U.S. International Trade Commission has determined not to review an initial determination (‘‘ID’’) issued by the presiding administrative law judge (‘‘ALJ’’) on September 19, 2005, granting complainant’s motion to terminate the investigation based on a settlement agreement. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Michael Liberman, Esq., Office of the General Counsel, U.S. International Trade Commission, 500 E Street, SW., Washington, DC 20436, telephone 202– 205–3115. Copies of the public version of the IDs and all nonconfidential documents filed in connection with this investigation are or will be available for inspection during official business hours (8:45 a.m. to 5:15 p.m.) in the Office of the Secretary, U.S. International Trade Commission, 500 E Street, SW., Washington, DC 20436, telephone 202–205–2000. Hearingimpaired persons are advised that information on this matter can be obtained by contacting the Commission’s TDD terminal on 202– 205–1810. General information concerning the Commission may also be obtained by accessing its Internet server (https://www.usitc.gov). The public record for this investigation may be viewed on the Commission’s electronic docket (EDIS) at https://edis.usitc.gov. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On January 19, 2005, the Commission instituted an investigation under section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, 19 U.S.C. 1337, based on a complaint filed by Marvell International, Ltd. of Hamilton, Bermuda (‘‘Marvell’’), alleging a violation of section 337 in the importation, sale for importation, and sale within the United States after importation of certain network controllers and products containing same by reason of infringement of claims 68, 70, and 71 of U.S. Patent No. 6, 462,688 (the ‘‘688 patent’’), and claims 22–32, 54, and 55 of U.S. Patent No. 6,775,529 (the ‘‘529 patent’’). 70 FR E:\FR\FM\14OCN1.SGM 14OCN1 Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 198 / Friday, October 14, 2005 / Notices 3067 (January 19, 2005). The complainant named Realtek Semiconductor Corporation of Hsinchu, Taiwan, and Real Communications, Inc., of San Jose, CA (collectively, ‘‘Realtek’’), as respondents. Subsequently, the complaint and notice of investigation were amended to add an additional respondent, BizLink Technology, Inc. (‘‘BizLink’’). On August 31, 2005, complainant Marvell moved to terminate the investigation in whole pursuant to 19 U.S.C. 1337(c) and 19 CFR 210.21 based on a settlement agreement. On September 12, 2005, respondents Realtek and BizLink filed a response to the motion. Respondents do not oppose the motion to terminate. On the same day, the Commission investigative attorney (‘‘IA’’) filed a response in support of the motion. On September 16, 2005, Marvell filed a reply to respondents’ and the IA’s responses. On September 19, 2005, the ALJ issued an ID (Order No. 21) granting complainant’s motion. No party petitioned for review of the ALJ’s ID. The authority for the Commission’s determination is contained in section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (19 U.S.C. 1337), and in § 210.42 of the Commission’s Rules of Practice and Procedure (19 CFR 210.42). By order of the Commission. Issued: October 7, 2005. Marilyn R. Abbott, Secretary to the Commission. [FR Doc. 05–20571 Filed 10–13–05; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 7020–02–P INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION [Investigation Nos. 731–TA–636–638 (Second Review)] Stainless Steel Wire Rod From Brazil, France, and India United States International Trade Commission. ACTION: Notice of Commission determination to conduct full five-year reviews concerning the antidumping duty orders on stainless steel wire rod from Brazil, France, and India. AGENCY: SUMMARY: The Commission hereby gives notice that it will proceed with full reviews pursuant to section 751(c)(5) of the Tariff Act of 1930 (19 U.S.C. 1675(c)(5)) to determine whether revocation of the antidumping duty orders on stainless steel wire rod from Brazil, France, and India would be likely to lead to continuation or recurrence of material injury within a VerDate Aug<31>2005 13:54 Oct 13, 2005 Jkt 208001 reasonably foreseeable time. A schedule for the reviews will be established and announced at a later date. For further information concerning the conduct of these reviews and rules of general application, consult the Commission’s Rules of Practice and Procedure, part 201, subparts A through E (19 CFR part 201), and part 207, subparts A, D, E, and F (19 CFR part 207). EFFECTIVE DATE: October 4, 2005. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mary Messer (202–205–3193), Office of Investigations, U.S. International Trade Commission, 500 E Street, SW., Washington, DC 20436. Hearingimpaired persons can obtain information on this matter by contacting the Commission’s TDD terminal on 202– 205–1810. Persons with mobility impairments who will need special assistance in gaining access to the Commission should contact the Office of the Secretary at 202–205–2000. General information concerning the Commission may also be obtained by accessing its Internet server (https:// www.usitc.gov). The public record for these reviews may be viewed on the Commission’s electronic docket (EDIS) at https://edis.usitc.gov. On October 4, 2005, the Commission determined that it should proceed to full reviews in the subject five-year reviews pursuant to section 751(c)(5) of the Act. The Commission found that the domestic interested party group response to its notice of institution (70 FR 38207, July 1, 2005) was adequate, and that the respondent interested party group response with respect to France was adequate, but found that the respondent interested party group responses with respect to Brazil and India were inadequate. However, the Commission determined to conduct full reviews concerning subject imports from Brazil and India to promote administrative efficiency in light of its decision to conduct a full review with respect to subject imports from France. A record of the Commissioners’ votes, the Commission’s statement on adequacy, and any individual Commissioner’s statements will be available from the Office of the Secretary and at the Commission’s Web site. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Authority: These reviews are being conducted under authority of title VII of the Tariff Act of 1930; this notice is published pursuant to section 207.62 of the Commission’s rules. By order of the Commission. PO 00000 Frm 00050 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 60109 Issued: October 11, 2005. Marilyn R. Abbott, Secretary to the Commission. [FR Doc. 05–20620 Filed 10–13–05; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 7020–02–P INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION [Inv. No. 337–TA–510; Enforcement Proceeding] In the Matter of Systems for Detecting and Removing Viruses or Worms, Components Thereof, and Products Containing Same; Notice of Institution of Formal Enforcement Proceeding International Trade Commission. ACTION: Notice. AGENCY: SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that the U.S. International Trade Commission has instituted a formal enforcement proceeding relating to a cease and desist order issued at the conclusion of the above-captioned investigation. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Timothy P. Monaghan, Esq., Office of the General Counsel, U.S. International Trade Commission, 500 E Street, SW., Washington, DC 20436, telephone 202– 205–3152. Copies of the public version of all nonconfidential documents filed in connection with this investigation are or will be available for inspection during official business hours (8:45 a.m. to 5:15 p.m.) in the Office of the Secretary, U.S. International Trade Commission, 500 E Street, SW., Washington, DC 20436, telephone 202– 205–2000. Hearing-impaired persons are advised that information on this matter can be obtained by contacting the Commission’s TDD terminal on 202– 205–1810. General information concerning the Commission may also be obtained by accessing its Internet server (https://www.usitc.gov). The public record for this investigation may be viewed on the Commission’s electronic docket (EDIS) at https://edis.usitc.gov. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This patent-based section 337 investigation was instituted by the Commission on June 3, 2004, based on a complaint filed by Trend Micro Inc. (‘‘Trend Micro’’) of Cupertino, California. 69 FR 32044– 32045 (June 8, 2004). The complaint alleged violations of section 337 in the importation into the United States, the sale for importation into the United States, or the sale within the United States after importation of certain systems for detecting and removing viruses or worms, components thereof, E:\FR\FM\14OCN1.SGM 14OCN1

Agencies

[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 198 (Friday, October 14, 2005)]
[Notices]
[Pages 60108-60109]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-20571]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION

[Inv. No. 337-TA-531]


In the Matter of Certain Network Controllers and Products 
Containing Same; Notice of Decision Not To Review an Initial 
Determination Granting Complainant's Motion To Terminate the 
Investigation Based on a Settlement Agreement

AGENCY: U.S. International Trade Commission.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that the U.S. International Trade 
Commission has determined not to review an initial determination 
(``ID'') issued by the presiding administrative law judge (``ALJ'') on 
September 19, 2005, granting complainant's motion to terminate the 
investigation based on a settlement agreement.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Michael Liberman, Esq., Office of the 
General Counsel, U.S. International Trade Commission, 500 E Street, 
SW., Washington, DC 20436, telephone 202-205-3115. Copies of the public 
version of the IDs and all nonconfidential documents filed in 
connection with this investigation are or will be available for 
inspection during official business hours (8:45 a.m. to 5:15 p.m.) in 
the Office of the Secretary, U.S. International Trade Commission, 500 E 
Street, SW., Washington, DC 20436, telephone 202-205-2000. Hearing-
impaired persons are advised that information on this matter can be 
obtained by contacting the Commission's TDD terminal on 202-205-1810. 
General information concerning the Commission may also be obtained by 
accessing its Internet server (https://www.usitc.gov). The public record 
for this investigation may be viewed on the Commission's electronic 
docket (EDIS) at https://edis.usitc.gov.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On January 19, 2005, the Commission 
instituted an investigation under section 337 of the Tariff Act of 
1930, 19 U.S.C. 1337, based on a complaint filed by Marvell 
International, Ltd. of Hamilton, Bermuda (``Marvell''), alleging a 
violation of section 337 in the importation, sale for importation, and 
sale within the United States after importation of certain network 
controllers and products containing same by reason of infringement of 
claims 68, 70, and 71 of U.S. Patent No. 6, 462,688 (the ``688 
patent''), and claims 22-32, 54, and 55 of U.S. Patent No. 6,775,529 
(the ``529 patent''). 70 FR

[[Page 60109]]

3067 (January 19, 2005). The complainant named Realtek Semiconductor 
Corporation of Hsinchu, Taiwan, and Real Communications, Inc., of San 
Jose, CA (collectively, ``Realtek''), as respondents. Subsequently, the 
complaint and notice of investigation were amended to add an additional 
respondent, BizLink Technology, Inc. (``BizLink'').
    On August 31, 2005, complainant Marvell moved to terminate the 
investigation in whole pursuant to 19 U.S.C. 1337(c) and 19 CFR 210.21 
based on a settlement agreement. On September 12, 2005, respondents 
Realtek and BizLink filed a response to the motion. Respondents do not 
oppose the motion to terminate. On the same day, the Commission 
investigative attorney (``IA'') filed a response in support of the 
motion. On September 16, 2005, Marvell filed a reply to respondents' 
and the IA's responses.
    On September 19, 2005, the ALJ issued an ID (Order No. 21) granting 
complainant's motion. No party petitioned for review of the ALJ's ID.
    The authority for the Commission's determination is contained in 
section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (19 U.S.C. 1337), and 
in Sec.  210.42 of the Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure (19 
CFR 210.42).

    By order of the Commission.

    Issued: October 7, 2005.
Marilyn R. Abbott,
Secretary to the Commission.
[FR Doc. 05-20571 Filed 10-13-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7020-02-P
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.