Sparklers From the People's Republic of China; Notice of Final Results of Expedited Sunset Review of Antidumping Duty Order, 58382-58383 [E5-5513]
Download as PDF
<![CDATA[
58382
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 193 / Thursday, October 6, 2005 / Notices
the preliminary results to a maximum of
365 days from the last of the anniversary
month of the order. Accordingly, the
Department is extending the time limit
for the completion of the preliminary
results until no later than February 28,
2006. The deadline for the final results
of this administrative review continues
to be 120 days after the publication of
the preliminary results, unless
extended.
This notice is issued and published in
accordance with section 751(a)(3)(A) of
the Act.
to prevail if the order were revoked are
identified in the Final Results of Review
section of this notice.
DATES: October 6, 2005.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION: Maureen
Flannery, AD/CVD Operations, Office 8,
International Trade Administration,
U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th
Street & Constitution Avenue, NW.,
Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202)
482–3020.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Dated: September 29, 2005.
Barbara E. Tillman,
Acting Deputy Assistant Secretary for Import
Administration.
[FR Doc. E5–5516 Filed 10–5–05; 8:45 am]
On June 1, 2005, the Department
published the notice of initiation of the
sunset review of the antidumping duty
order on sparklers from China. See
Initiation of Five-Year (‘‘Sunset’’)
Reviews, 70 FR 31423 (June 1, 2005). On
June 8, 2005 and June 16, 2005, the
Department received Notices of Intent to
Participate from Diamond Sparkler
Manufacturing Company and Elkton
Sparkler Company (collectively
‘‘domestic interested parties’’) within
the deadline specified in section
351.218(d)(1)(i) of the Department’s
regulations. The domestic interested
parties claimed interested party status
under section 771(9)(C) of the Act, as a
manufacturer, producer, or wholesaler
in the United States of a domestic like
product. On June 22, 2005, and July 1,
2005, the Department received complete
substantive responses from the domestic
interested parties within the deadline
specified in section 351.218(d)(3)(i) of
the Department’s regulations. We did
not receive a response from any
respondent interested party to this
proceeding. As a result, pursuant to
section 751(c)(3)(B) of the Act and
section 351.218(e)(1)(ii)(C)(2) of the
Department’s regulations, the
Department conducted an expedited
review of this order.
BILLING CODE 3510–DS–S
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
[A–570–804]
Sparklers From the People’s Republic
of China; Notice of Final Results of
Expedited Sunset Review of
Antidumping Duty Order
Import Administration,
International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
SUMMARY: On June 1, 2005, the
Department of Commerce (‘‘the
Department’’) initiated the sunset
review of the antidumping duty order
on sparklers from the People’s Republic
of China (‘‘China’’) pursuant to section
751(c) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as
amended (‘‘the Act’’). On the basis of
Notices of Intent to Participate, adequate
substantive responses filed on behalf of
domestic interested parties, and lack of
response from respondent interested
parties, the Department conducted an
expedited (120-day) sunset review. As a
result of this sunset review, the
Department finds that revocation of the
antidumping duty order would be likely
to lead to continuation or recurrence of
dumping. The dumping margins likely
AGENCY:
Background
Scope of the Order
The products subject to this order are
fireworks each comprising a cut-tolength wire, one end of which is coated
with a chemical mix that emits bright
sparks while burning. Sparklers are
currently classified under subheadings
3604.10.10.00, 3604.10.90.10, and
3604.10.90.50 of the Harmonized Tariff
Schedule of the United States
(‘‘HTSUS’’). Sparklers were formerly
classified under HTSUS subcategory
3604.10.00. The Department has
reviewed current categories and has
determined that sparklers are currently
classified in the above subcategories.
Although HTSUS subheadings are
provided for convenience and customs
purposes, the written description of the
merchandise under the order is
dispositive.
Analysis of Comments Received
All issues raised in this review are
addressed in the ‘‘Issues and Decision
Memorandum’’ (‘‘Decision Memo’’)
from Barbara E. Tillman, Acting Deputy
Assistant Secretary for Import
Administration, to Joseph A. Spetrini,
Acting Assistant Secretary for Import
Administration, dated September 29,
2005, which is hereby adopted by this
notice. The issues discussed in the
Decision Memo include the likelihood
of continuation or recurrence of
dumping and the magnitude of the
margins likely to prevail if the order
were revoked. Parties can find a
complete discussion of all issues raised
in this review and the corresponding
recommendations in this public
memorandum which is on file in room
B–099 of the main Commerce building.
In addition, a complete version of the
Decision Memo can be accessed directly
on the Web at https://ia.ita.doc.gov/frn/
index.html, under the heading ‘‘October
2005.’’ The paper copy and electronic
version of the Decision Memo are
identical in content.
Final Results of Review
We determine that revocation of the
antidumping duty order on sparklers
from China would likely lead to
continuation or recurrence of dumping
at the following weighted-average
percentage margins:
Weighted
average
margin
(percent)
Manufacturers/Exporters/Producers
Guangxi Native Produce Import & Export Corporation, Behai Fireworks and Firecrackers Branch ......................................................
Hunan Provincial Firecrackers & Fireworks Import & Export Corporation ..............................................................................................
Jiangxi Native Produce Import & Export Corporation, Guangzhou Fireworks Company .......................................................................
China-wide rate ........................................................................................................................................................................................
This notice also serves as the only
reminder to parties subject to
administrative protective order (‘‘APO’’)
VerDate Aug<31>2005
19:52 Oct 05, 2005
Jkt 208001
of their responsibility concerning the
return or destruction of proprietary
information disclosed under APO in
PO 00000
Frm 00013
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
41.75
93.54
93.54
93.54
accordance with section 351.305 of the
Department’s regulations. Timely
notification of the return or destruction
E:\FR\FM\06OCN1.SGM
06OCN1
58383
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 193 / Thursday, October 6, 2005 / Notices
of APO materials or conversion to
judicial protective order is hereby
requested. Failure to comply with the
regulations and terms of an APO is a
violation which is subject to sanction.
We are issuing and publishing these
results and notice in accordance with
sections 751(c), 752, and 777(i)(1) of the
Act.
Dated: September 29, 2005.
Barbara E. Tillman,
Acting Assistant Secretary for Import
Administration.
[FR Doc. E5–5513 Filed 10–5–05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
[A–570–601]
Tapered Roller Bearings from the
People’s Republic of China: Notice of
Final Results of Expedited Sunset
Review of Antidumping Duty Order
Import Administration,
International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
SUMMARY: On June 1, 2005, the
Department of Commerce (‘‘the
Department’’) initiated the sunset
review of the antidumping duty order
on tapered roller bearings from the
People’s Republic of China (‘‘China’’)
pursuant to section 751(c) of the Tariff
Act of 1930, as amended (‘‘the Act’’). On
the basis of a Notice of Intent to
Participate, adequate substantive
responses filed on behalf of domestic
interested parties, and lack of response
from respondent interested parties, the
Department conducted an expedited
(120-day) sunset review. As a result of
this sunset review, the Department finds
that revocation of the antidumping duty
order would be likely to lead to
continuation or recurrence of dumping.
The dumping margins likely to prevail
if the order were revoked are identified
AGENCY:
in the Final Results of Review section of
this notice.
DATES: October 6, 2005.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION: Maureen
Flannery, AD/CVD Operations, Office 8,
International Trade Administration,
U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th
Street & Constitution Avenue, NW.,
Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202)
482–3020.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
On June 1, 2005, the Department
published the notice of initiation of the
sunset review of the antidumping duty
order on tapered roller bearings from
China. See Initiation of Five-Year
(‘‘Sunset’’) Reviews, 70 FR 31423 (June
1, 2005). On June 16, 2005, the
Department received a joint Notice of
Intent to Participate from RBC Bearings
and The Timken Company (collectively
‘‘domestic interested parties’’) within
the deadline specified in section
351.218(d)(1)(i) of the Department’s
regulations. The domestic interested
parties claimed interested party status
under section 771(9)(C) of the Act, as
manufacturers, producers, or
wholesalers in the United States of a
domestic like product. On July 1, 2005,
the Department received a complete
substantive response from the domestic
interested parties within the deadline
specified in section 351.218(d)(3)(i) of
the Department’s regulations. The
Department did not receive a response
from any respondent interested party to
this proceeding. As a result, pursuant to
section 751(c)(3)(B) of the Act and
section 351.218(e)(1)(ii)(C)(2) of the
Department’s regulations, the
Department conducted an expedited
review of this order.
Scope of the Order
Merchandise covered by this order is
tapered roller bearings from China;
flange, take up cartridge, and hanger
units incorporating tapered roller
bearings; and tapered roller housings
(except pillow blocks) incorporating
tapered rollers, with or without
spindles, whether or not for automotive
use. This merchandise is currently
classifiable under the Harmonized Tariff
Schedule of the United States
(‘‘HTSUS’’) item numbers 8482.20.00,
8482.91.00.50, 8482.99.30, 8483.20.40,
8483.20.80, 8483.30.80, 8483.90.20,
8483.90.30, 8483.90.80, 8708.99.80.15,
and 8708.99.80.80. Although the
HTSUS item numbers are provided for
convenience and customs purposes, the
written description of the scope of the
order is dispositive.
Analysis of Comments Received
All issues raised in this review are
addressed in the ‘‘Issues and Decision
Memorandum’’ (‘‘Decision Memo’’)
from Barbara E. Tillman, Acting Deputy
Assistant Secretary for Import
Administration, to Joseph A. Spetrini,
Acting Assistant Secretary for Import
Administration, dated September 29,
2005, which is hereby adopted by this
notice. The issues discussed in the
Decision Memo include the likelihood
of continuation or recurrence of
dumping and the magnitude of the
margins likely to prevail if the order
were revoked. Parties can find a
complete discussion of all issues raised
in this review and the corresponding
recommendations in this public
memorandum which is on file in room
B–099 of the main Commerce building.
In addition, a complete version of the
Decision Memo can be accessed directly
on the Web at https://ia.ita.doc.gov/frn/
index.html, under the heading ‘‘October
2005.’’ The paper copy and electronic
version of the Decision Memo are
identical in content.
Final Results of Review
We determine that revocation of the
antidumping duty order on tapered
roller bearings from China would likely
lead to continuation or recurrence of
dumping at the following weightedaverage percentage margins:
Weighted
average
margin
(percent)
Manufacturers/Exporters/Producers
Zheijiang Changshan Changhe Bearing Co. ...........................................................................................................................................
China National Machinery Import & Export Corp. ...................................................................................................................................
Zheijiang Wanxiang Group ......................................................................................................................................................................
Zheijiang Machinery Import & Export Corp. ............................................................................................................................................
Luoyang Bearing Corporation ..................................................................................................................................................................
Premier Bearing & Equipment, Ltd. .........................................................................................................................................................
Liaoning Mec Group, Ltd. ........................................................................................................................................................................
China National Machinery and Equipment Import & Export Corp. .........................................................................................................
China-wide Rate ......................................................................................................................................................................................
VerDate Aug<31>2005
19:52 Oct 05, 2005
Jkt 208001
PO 00000
Frm 00014
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
E:\FR\FM\06OCN1.SGM
06OCN1
0.00
0.03
0.03
0.11
3.20
5.43
9.72
29.40
29.40
]]>Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 193 (Thursday, October 6, 2005)]
[Notices]
[Pages 58382-58383]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E5-5513]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
[A-570-804]
Sparklers From the People's Republic of China; Notice of Final
Results of Expedited Sunset Review of Antidumping Duty Order
AGENCY: Import Administration, International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
SUMMARY: On June 1, 2005, the Department of Commerce (``the
Department'') initiated the sunset review of the antidumping duty order
on sparklers from the People's Republic of China (``China'') pursuant
to section 751(c) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (``the Act'').
On the basis of Notices of Intent to Participate, adequate substantive
responses filed on behalf of domestic interested parties, and lack of
response from respondent interested parties, the Department conducted
an expedited (120-day) sunset review. As a result of this sunset
review, the Department finds that revocation of the antidumping duty
order would be likely to lead to continuation or recurrence of dumping.
The dumping margins likely to prevail if the order were revoked are
identified in the Final Results of Review section of this notice.
DATES: October 6, 2005.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION: Maureen Flannery, AD/CVD Operations, Office 8,
International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th
Street & Constitution Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20230; telephone:
(202) 482-3020.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
On June 1, 2005, the Department published the notice of initiation
of the sunset review of the antidumping duty order on sparklers from
China. See Initiation of Five-Year (``Sunset'') Reviews, 70 FR 31423
(June 1, 2005). On June 8, 2005 and June 16, 2005, the Department
received Notices of Intent to Participate from Diamond Sparkler
Manufacturing Company and Elkton Sparkler Company (collectively
``domestic interested parties'') within the deadline specified in
section 351.218(d)(1)(i) of the Department's regulations. The domestic
interested parties claimed interested party status under section
771(9)(C) of the Act, as a manufacturer, producer, or wholesaler in the
United States of a domestic like product. On June 22, 2005, and July 1,
2005, the Department received complete substantive responses from the
domestic interested parties within the deadline specified in section
351.218(d)(3)(i) of the Department's regulations. We did not receive a
response from any respondent interested party to this proceeding. As a
result, pursuant to section 751(c)(3)(B) of the Act and section
351.218(e)(1)(ii)(C)(2) of the Department's regulations, the Department
conducted an expedited review of this order.
Scope of the Order
The products subject to this order are fireworks each comprising a
cut-to-length wire, one end of which is coated with a chemical mix that
emits bright sparks while burning. Sparklers are currently classified
under subheadings 3604.10.10.00, 3604.10.90.10, and 3604.10.90.50 of
the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States (``HTSUS'').
Sparklers were formerly classified under HTSUS subcategory 3604.10.00.
The Department has reviewed current categories and has determined that
sparklers are currently classified in the above subcategories. Although
HTSUS subheadings are provided for convenience and customs purposes,
the written description of the merchandise under the order is
dispositive.
Analysis of Comments Received
All issues raised in this review are addressed in the ``Issues and
Decision Memorandum'' (``Decision Memo'') from Barbara E. Tillman,
Acting Deputy Assistant Secretary for Import Administration, to Joseph
A. Spetrini, Acting Assistant Secretary for Import Administration,
dated September 29, 2005, which is hereby adopted by this notice. The
issues discussed in the Decision Memo include the likelihood of
continuation or recurrence of dumping and the magnitude of the margins
likely to prevail if the order were revoked. Parties can find a
complete discussion of all issues raised in this review and the
corresponding recommendations in this public memorandum which is on
file in room B-099 of the main Commerce building.
In addition, a complete version of the Decision Memo can be
accessed directly on the Web at https://ia.ita.doc.gov/frn/,
under the heading ``October 2005.'' The paper copy and electronic
version of the Decision Memo are identical in content.
Final Results of Review
We determine that revocation of the antidumping duty order on
sparklers from China would likely lead to continuation or recurrence of
dumping at the following weighted-average percentage margins:
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Weighted
average
Manufacturers/Exporters/Producers margin
(percent)
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Guangxi Native Produce Import & Export Corporation, Behai 41.75
Fireworks and Firecrackers Branch.........................
Hunan Provincial Firecrackers & Fireworks Import & Export 93.54
Corporation...............................................
Jiangxi Native Produce Import & Export Corporation, 93.54
Guangzhou Fireworks Company...............................
China-wide rate............................................ 93.54
------------------------------------------------------------------------
This notice also serves as the only reminder to parties subject to
administrative protective order (``APO'') of their responsibility
concerning the return or destruction of proprietary information
disclosed under APO in accordance with section 351.305 of the
Department's regulations. Timely notification of the return or
destruction
[[Page 58383]]
of APO materials or conversion to judicial protective order is hereby
requested. Failure to comply with the regulations and terms of an APO
is a violation which is subject to sanction.
We are issuing and publishing these results and notice in
accordance with sections 751(c), 752, and 777(i)(1) of the Act.
Dated: September 29, 2005.
Barbara E. Tillman,
Acting Assistant Secretary for Import Administration.
[FR Doc. E5-5513 Filed 10-5-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P
