Use of or Impairment From Alcohol and Other Drugs on Mine Property, 57808-57811 [05-19846]
Download as PDF
57808
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 191 / Tuesday, October 4, 2005 / Proposed Rules
corrected to read ‘‘communications
income. The source of income’’.
Comments to this advance notice
of proposed rulemaking must be
received by November 27, 2005.
We will hold seven public meetings to
gather additional information. The dates
and locations are listed in the Public
Meetings section under SUPPLEMENTARY
INFORMATION. Individuals or
organizations wishing to make
presentations for the record are asked to
submit a request to us at least five days
prior to the meeting date; however,
those who do not submit a request in
advance will be given an opportunity to
speak.
ADDRESSES: Comments must include
Regulation Identifier Number (RIN)
1219–AB41 and may be submitted by
any of the following methods:
• Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://
www.regulations.gov. Follow the
instructions for submitting comments.
• E-mail to zzMSHAcomments@dol.gov. Include RIN 1219–
AB41 in the subject line of the message.
• Fax: (202) 693–9441.
• Regular Mail or Hand Delivery:
MSHA, Office of Standards,
Regulations, and Variances, 1100
Wilson Blvd., Room 2350, Arlington,
Virginia 22209–3939.
• Access to Docket: We post all
comments received without change,
including any personal information
provided, at https://www.msha.gov under
the ‘‘Rules & Regs’’ link. The public
docket may be viewed at our Office of
Standards, Regulations, and Variances,
1100 Wilson Blvd., Room 2349,
Arlington, Virginia.
DATES:
Cynthia Grigsby,
Acting Chief, Publications and Regulations
Branch, Legal Processing Division, Associate
Chief Counsel (Procedure and
Administration).
[FR Doc. 05–19779 Filed 10–3–05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4830–01–P
DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
Mine Safety and Health Administration
30 CFR Parts 46, 48, 50, 56, 57, 75, and
77
RIN 1219–AB41
Use of or Impairment From Alcohol
and Other Drugs on Mine Property
Mine Safety and Health
Administration (MSHA), Labor.
ACTION: Advance notice of proposed
rulemaking; notice of public meetings;
close of record.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: Because of the inherent
dangers present in all mining
environments, we are considering
regulatory and non-regulatory
approaches to address the risks and
hazards to miner safety from the use of
or impairment from alcohol and other
drugs, and are soliciting information
from the public to help determine how
to proceed.
• We maintain a listserve on our Web
site that enables subscribers to receive email notification when we publish
rulemaking documents in the Federal
Register. To subscribe to the listserve,
visit our site at https://www.msha.gov/
subscriptions/subscribe.aspx.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Rebecca J. Smith, Acting Director, Office
of Standards, Regulations, and
Variances at 202–693–9440 (voice),
202–693–9441 (fax), or
smith.rebecca@dol.gov (e-mail).
Outline of ANPRM
This outline will assist you in finding
information in the SUPPLEMENTARY
INFORMATION section of this document.
Supplementary Information
I. Public Meetings
II. Introduction
III. Background
IV. Issues
A. Nature, Extent, and Impact of the
Problem
B. Prohibited Substances and Impaired
Miners
C. Training
D. Inquiries Following Accidents
E. Drug-Free Workplace Programs
F. Costs and Benefits
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Public Meetings
The public meetings will begin at 9
a.m. and end after the last speaker
testifies (in any event not later than 5
p.m.) on the following dates:
Date
Location
October 24, 2005 ...........
October 26, 2005 ...........
October 28, 2005 ...........
October 31, 2005 ...........
November 2, 2005 .........
November 4, 2005 .........
November 8, 2005 .........
Little America Hotel, 500 S Main Street, Salt Lake City, UT 84101 ....................................................
Hyatt Regency St. Louis, 1 St. Louis Union Station, St. Louis, MO 63103 ........................................
Sheraton Birmingham, 2101 Richard Arrington Jr. Blvd. North, Birmingham, AL 35203 ....................
Sheraton Suites Lexington, 2601 Richmond Rd., Lexington, KY 40506 .............................................
Marriott Town Center, 200 Lee St. East, Charleston, WV 25301 .......................................................
Hyatt Regency Pittsburgh Int’l Airport, 1111 Airport Blvd., Pittsburgh, PA 15231 ..............................
MSHA Conference Room 25th Floor, 1100 Wilson Blvd., Arlington, VA 22209 .................................
The meetings will begin with an
opening statement from us, followed by
an opportunity for members of the
public to make oral presentations to our
panel. You do not have to make a
written request to speak. You will speak
in the order that you sign in. Any
unallotted time will be made available
for persons making same-day requests.
At the discretion of our presiding
official, the time allocated to speakers
for your presentation may be limited.
We will accept written comments and
data for the record from any interested
party, including those not presenting
oral statements. The comment period
will close on November 27, 2005.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
18:03 Oct 03, 2005
Jkt 208001
Phone
The meetings will be conducted in an
informal manner. We may ask questions
of you. Although formal rules of
evidence or cross examination will not
apply, we may exercise discretion to
ensure the orderly progress of the
meeting and may exclude irrelevant or
unduly repetitious material and
questions.
A verbatim transcript of the meetings
will be included in the rulemaking
record. Copies of this transcript will be
available to the public, and can be
accessed at https://www.msha.gov.
PO 00000
Frm 00005
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
801–363–6781
800–233–1234
205–324–5000
859–268–0060
304–345–6500
800 233–1234
202 693–9440
II. Introduction
Given that our accident investigations
do not routinely include an inquiry into
the use of alcohol or other drugs as a
contributing factor, there may be many
instances in which alcohol or other
drugs were involved in accidents and
are not reported to us or that we do not
uncover during investigations. Our
preliminary review of our fatal and nonfatal mine accident records revealed a
number of instances in which alcohol or
other drugs or drug paraphernalia were
found or reported, or in which the postaccident toxicology screen revealed the
presence of alcohol or other drugs.
E:\FR\FM\04OCP1.SGM
04OCP1
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 191 / Tuesday, October 4, 2005 / Proposed Rules
We are concerned that miners’ use of
and impairment from alcohol and other
drugs can create considerable (but
preventable) risks to miner safety. To
the extent that use and abuse of alcohol
and other drugs by miners is prevalent,
it reflects problems in the community in
general and the labor force as a whole.
The Department of Health and Human
Services, Substance Abuse and Mental
Health Services Administration’s
(SAMHSA) 2003 National Survey on
Drug Use and Health (formerly the
National Household Survey on Drug
Abuse) shows that these community
problems are also found in the labor
force. The survey reports that of 16.7
million illicit drug users age 18 or older,
12.4 million (74.3 percent) were
employed either full or part time. In
addition, 14.9 million (77 percent) of
the 19.4 million adults, age 18 or older,
characterized with abuse of or
dependence on alcohol or drugs were
employed. The Bureau of Labor
Statistics analyzed 1998 data from its
Census of Fatal Occupational Injuries
and estimated that 19 percent of the
nation’s workforce who die on the job
test positive for alcohol and other
drugs.1 Similarly, a 1993 analysis of
toxicology data on injured workers’
blood alcohol concentration estimated
that ten percent of fatal work injuries
and five percent of non-fatal work
injuries overall involved acute alcohol
impairment.2
SAMHSA’s 2000 National Household
Survey on Drug Abuse analyzes alcohol
and other drug use and abuse by
industry sector. Notably, the
construction and mining industries have
the highest percentage of workers who
reported current illicit drug use 3 or
have an alcohol dependence disorder or
alcohol abuse disorder. Nearly one in
seven workers in these industries report
having a serious alcohol problem. The
report shows the following rates of use
for the mining and construction
industries: 15.7% past month heavy
alcohol use; 12.3% past month any
illicit drug use; 10.9% past year
dependence or abuse of alcohol; and
3.6% past year dependence or abuse of
illicit drugs.
Using drugs or alcohol can impair a
miner’s coordination and judgment
significantly at a time when he or she
1 Weber, W., and Cox, C. ‘‘Work-Related Fatal
Injuries in 1998,’’ Compensations and Working
Conditions, Spring 2001, pp. 27–29.
2 Zwerling, C. ‘‘Current practice and Experience
in Drug and Alcohol Testing.’’ Bulletin on
Narcotics, vol. 45 (1993), pp. 155–196.
3 The survey defined current illicit drug use as the
use of marijuana, cocaine, heroin, hallucinogens,
inhalants or non-medical use of prescription-type
pain relievers, tranquilizers, stimulants, or
sedatives in the past 30 days.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
18:03 Oct 03, 2005
Jkt 208001
needs to be alert, aware, and capable of
performing complicated tasks. Even
prescription medications may affect a
miner’s perceptions and reaction time.
Mining is a complicated and hazardous
occupation, and a clear focus on the
work at hand is a crucial component of
workplace safety. Alcohol- or drugimpaired miners endanger themselves
as well as their co-workers.
A number of mine operators recognize
this problem, and require applicants for
employment to pass a pre-employment
drug screening. At a summit held on
December 18, 2004, some mine
operators stated that a substantial
number of job applicants are unable to
pass the initial drug screen.
III. Background
Since the late 1980s, the federal
government has implemented a number
of programs aimed at reducing the use
of alcohol and other drugs in the
workplace. The Anti-Drug Abuse Act of
1986 (Pub. L. 99–570), among other
things, directed the Secretary of Labor to
initiate efforts to address the issue.
Subsequently, Executive Order 12564,
Drug-Free Federal Workplace,
established federal drug-free
workplaces, making it a condition of
employment for all federal employees to
refrain from using illegal drugs. The
Drug-Free Workplace Act of 1988, 41
U.S.C. 701, et seq., requires Federal
contractors and grantees to have drugfree workplaces, and the Drug-Free
Workplace Act of 1998, 15 U.S.C. 654,
established grant programs that assist
small businesses in developing drugfree workplace programs. To protect
public safety, the Omnibus
Transportation Employee Testing Act of
1991, Public Law 102–143, requires
transportation industry employers to
conduct drug and alcohol testing for
employees in ‘‘safety-sensitive’’
positions, creating a model that many
non-regulated employers follow.
In support of the President’s goal of
lowering the rate of illegal drug use, the
Department of Labor’s (DOL) Working
Partners for an Alcohol- and Drug-Free
Workplace (Working Partners) public
outreach campaign raises awareness
about the impact of alcohol and other
drug use on businesses and encourages
and assists employers to implement
drug-free workplace programs that
protect worker safety and health and
respect worker rights. DOL’s
Occupational Safety and Health
Administration (OSHA) recognizes that
drug and alcohol impaired workers
constitute a safety hazard and strongly
supports comprehensive drug-free
workforce programs, especially in
certain workplace environments, such
PO 00000
Frm 00006
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
57809
as those involving safety-sensitive
duties like operating machinery.4 Over
the past year and a half, OSHA has
implemented a number of strategies in
support of this statement. For example,
OSHA along with MSHA and DOL’s
Working Partners program, formed an
alliance with four international labor
unions 5 focused exclusively on
improving worker health and safety
through drug-free workplace programs,
and an OSHA/National Federation of
Independent Business alliance
agreement specifically includes
promoting drug-free workplaces as a
goal. OSHA also developed a Web page
on workplace substance abuse, and
OSHA and DOL staff have presented at
conferences and written articles for
publications attracting occupational
safety and health professionals.
We currently address the presence
and use of intoxicating beverages and
narcotics at metal and nonmetal mines.
Sections 56.20001 and 57.20001 of 30
CFR state:
Intoxicating beverages and narcotics shall
not be permitted or used in or around mines.
Persons under the influence of alcohol or
narcotics shall not be permitted on the job.
Between January 1, 2000 and June 30,
2005, penalties were assessed for 75
violations of § 56.20001 and for three
violations of § 57.20001. Our regulations
contain no similar requirement for coal
mines.
We have initiated a number of
education and outreach efforts to raise
awareness in the mining industry of the
safety hazards stemming from the use of
alcohol and other drugs. We, in
partnership with the Joseph A. Holmes
Safety Association, established the
Professional Miner Program to recognize
miners who have worked injury-free for
at least three years. Miners who have
been recognized as Professional Miners
sign a pledge which includes a
commitment to ‘‘work to ensure a safe,
healthy, and alcohol and drug-free
workplace.’’ To date, approximately
15,500 miners have taken this pledge.
We participate in the drug-free work
place alliance mentioned above to
provide union members and the
construction industry with information,
guidance and access to training
resources that will help them
understand the benefits of drug-free
4 OSHA, ‘‘Safety and Health Topics, Workplace
Substance Abuse,’’ https://www.osha.gov/SLTC/
substanceabuse.
5 International Union of Operating Engineers;
United Brotherhood of Carpenters and Joiners of
America; International Association of Bridge,
Structural Steel, Ornamental and Reinforcing Iron
Workers; and International Brotherhood of
Boilermakers, Iron Ship Builders, Blacksmiths,
Forgers and Helpers.
E:\FR\FM\04OCP1.SGM
04OCP1
57810
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 191 / Tuesday, October 4, 2005 / Proposed Rules
workplace programs and protect
employee health and safety. Although
this alliance focuses on the construction
industry, a substantial number of the
union members work on mine property.
On December 8, 2004, we cosponsored with the states of Kentucky,
Virginia and West Virginia, a one-day
summit for individuals involved with
coal mining operations and activities in
the Southern Appalachian region. The
summit brought together industry, labor,
state and federal government officials,
and public health experts to share
information, expertise, and experience
in dealing with the use of or impairment
from alcohol and other drugs on mine
property. At the summit, industry
representatives expressed concerns
about the problems related to the use of
drugs and alcohol in mines. Several coal
mine operators described the
effectiveness of their drug-free
workplace programs and expressed their
concern that such programs were not
universal in the industry.
Along with Virginia and West
Virginia, we are participating in
Kentucky’s Mine Substance Abuse Task
Force. The task force currently meets
monthly to examine options for
eliminating the use of or impairment
from alcohol and other drugs on mine
property.
During the first four months of 2005,
in our annual Spring Thaw meetings
held by each of the 51 field offices of
our metal and nonmetal program area,
we included presentations and
discussion of drug and alcohol abuse to
raise awareness and provide
information to mine operators.
Our State Grants Program awards
federal grants to 49 states and the
Navajo Nation. Our 2006 Solicitation for
Grant Applications, sent out in July,
2005, requests that applicants include
substance abuse training as part of new
miner and annual refresher training
curriculum. With assistance from DOL’s
Working Partners program, we will be
developing materials to assist in
conducting this training. Further, our
National Mine Health and Safety
Academy is producing an awareness
video on the hazards of alcohol and
other drugs. This video will be used for
new miner and annual refresher
training.
A number of mine operators have
voluntarily implemented drug-free
workplace programs, and many report
that these programs have improved
workplace safety and reduced workers’
compensation costs. Additionally, some
of these operators have told us that
miners at their mines are supportive of
these programs. However, the adoption
of these programs is far from being an
VerDate Aug<31>2005
18:03 Oct 03, 2005
Jkt 208001
industry-wide practice. Many miners,
particularly those working in small
mines are not likely to have access to
these programs.
IV. Issues
We are seeking supporting
information or data that will help us
evaluate whether there is a need for
additional federal action to address
safety risks stemming from alcohol and
other drug use by miners, and if so,
whether this should involve rulemaking
and what that regulation should
include. In general, we are seeking
information and comment on the extent
of alcohol and other drug use problems
in the mining industry and the impact
on safety and health, and the types of
programs currently in place and their
effectiveness. Additionally, we need to
assess both the costs and benefits of any
intended federal action. We encourage
the public to respond to the questions
posed below. We also invite suggestions
on alternatives or supplements to
rulemaking that we should pursue.
Please be as specific as possible in your
responses to the questions and in
suggesting alternatives. Providing
specific examples, as well as cost and
benefit estimates where possible, will
help us evaluate and analyze your
comments.
A. Nature, Extent, and Impact of the
Problem
We believe that the use and misuse of
alcohol and other drugs in the mining
community and mining workplace
create a preventable risk to the safety of
miners. We are concerned that impaired
miners can jeopardize their own safety
and the safety of their fellow miners.
Please provide examples and data to
support your answers to the following
questions:
A1. What specific substances are most
prevalent and pose the greatest threats
to mine safety and health? Please
include comments on ‘‘controlled
substances,’’ illegal or illicit drugs,
alcohol, inhalants, prescription and
over-the-counter drugs, and any other
substances you believe may create safety
hazards when used or misused by
miners.
A2. Based on your experience and
knowledge of the industry, how
widespread is the use or misuse of
alcohol or other drugs in the mining
workplace?
A3. How severe a risk does the use or
misuse of alcohol and other drugs pose
to miners’ safety?
A4. What accidents or injuries at your
mine in the last five years have involved
alcohol or other drugs?
PO 00000
Frm 00007
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
B. Prohibited Substances and Impaired
Miners
Our existing metal and non-metal
standards [30 CFR 56/57.20001], as
stated above, require:
Intoxicating beverages and narcotics shall
not be permitted or used in or around mines.
Persons under the influence of alcohol or
narcotics shall not be permitted on the job.
No similar standard applies to coal
mines. Please provide examples and
data to support your answers to the
following questions:
B1. Should we revise this existing
metal and non-metal standard and
establish a standard for coal mines? If
so, how?
B2. What substances should be
prohibited? Please include comments on
controlled substances, alcohol, misuse
of prescription and over the counter
drugs, and inhalants.
B3. How should impairment be
determined, and who should make the
determination?
B4. What actions should operators be
required to take once an impaired miner
is identified (e.g., remove from site,
send home for the day, refer to the
Employee Assistance Program or
elsewhere for assessment, send for drug
test, terminate, fine, or other actions)?
B5. What policy or procedures do you
have regarding employees who are using
legally and properly prescribed drugs
that may cause impairment?
C. Training
Parts 46 and 48 of 30 CFR specify
training requirements for supervisors
and miners. Our regulations currently
do not require training in the prevention
of alcohol and other drug misuse. Please
provide examples and data to support
your answers to the following questions:
C1. Should our regulations address
training in the prevention of alcohol and
other drug misuse? If so, how?
C2. Who should receive this training
(e.g., supervisors, managers, foremen,
miners, miners’ representatives?)
C3. What topics should be included?
C4. What training do you provide to
address alcohol and other drug misuse?
D. Inquiries Following Accidents
Section 50.11 of 30 CFR (Investigation
of accidents) requires mine operators to
report and investigate accidents, and
establishes criteria for the investigation
and the report. Please provide examples
and data to support your answers to the
following questions:
D1. Should we revise 30 CFR 50.11 to
address alcohol and other drug use
inquiries by mine operators during
accident investigations? Section 50.11
provides as follows:
E:\FR\FM\04OCP1.SGM
04OCP1
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 191 / Tuesday, October 4, 2005 / Proposed Rules
§ 50.11 Investigation.
(a) After notification of an accident by an
operator, the MSHA District Manager will
promptly decide whether to conduct an
accident investigation and will promptly
inform the operator of his decision. If MSHA
decides to investigate an accident, it will
initiate the investigation within 24 hours of
notification.
(b) Each operator of a mine shall
investigate each accident and each
occupational injury at the mine. Each
operator of a mine shall develop a report of
each investigation. No operator may use
Form 7000–1 as a report, except that an
operator of a mine at which fewer than
twenty miners are employed may, with
respect to that mine, use Form 7000–1 as an
investigation report respecting an
occupational injury not related to an
accident. No operator may use an
investigation or an investigation report
conducted or prepared by MSHA to comply
with this paragraph. An operator shall submit
a copy of any investigation report to MSHA
at its request. Each report prepared by the
operator shall include,
(1) The date and hour of occurrence;
(2) The date the investigation began;
(3) The names of individuals participating
in the investigation;
(4) A description of the site;
(5) An explanation of the accident or
injury, including a description of any
equipment involved and relevant events
before and after the occurrence, and any
explanation of the cause of any injury, the
cause of any accident or cause of any other
event which caused an injury;
(6) The name, occupation, and experience
of any miner involved;
(7) A sketch, where pertinent, including
dimensions depicting the occurrence;
(8) A description of steps taken to prevent
a similar occurrence in the future; and
(9) Identification of any report submitted
under § 50.20 of this part.
D2. What type of alcohol and other
drug use inquiries should be made after
accidents (e.g., questioning, drug
testing)?
D3. What degree of accident or injury
should trigger an inquiry (all, fatal, losttime, others)?
D4. How should the information
collected in the inquiry be used, and by
whom?
D5. What actions should be required
if it is determined that the use of alcohol
or other drugs was a contributing factor
or cause of the accident?
E. Drug-Free Workplace Programs
Although our regulations currently do
not require programs to address the
safety hazards that the presence of
alcohol and other drugs in the
workplace may cause, some mine
operators have voluntarily put these
programs in place. Typically, such a
program, often called a drug-free
workplace program, includes at least
one of the following five components:
VerDate Aug<31>2005
18:03 Oct 03, 2005
Jkt 208001
drug-free workplace policy; employee
education; supervisory training; drug
testing; and an employee assistance
program. Please provide examples and
data to support your answers to the
following questions:
E1. Do you have a drug-free
workplace program at your mine, or
have you instituted any of the above
mentioned components, even if not
referred to as a drug-free workplace?
Please provide a copy of your program
policy and procedures. Is this program
part of a broader program?
E2. If you have a drug-free workplace
policy or program:
E2–a. What prompted you to initiate
your program?
E2–b. What components does your
program have?
E2–c. Which of your program’s
components do you feel are most critical
and/or effective, and why?
E2–d. Have you been able to
document any improvement as a result
of your program?
E2–e. Please provide any data that
demonstrate the extent of the problem at
your mine and the effectiveness of your
program in improving safety at your
mine.
E2–f. What issues/problems have you
encountered in implementing your
program and how have you resolved
them?
E2–g. What actions are taken for
miners who violate the terms of the
policy?
E3. If you previously had a drug-free
workplace program, what did it
include? Why was it discontinued?
E4. If you conduct supervisory
training on drug issues, how are
supervisors taught to recognize and
handle employees who may have
alcohol and/or other drug problems?
Please elaborate on how supervisors
make these determinations.
E5. Do you have an employee
assistance program, and if so, how many
employees have accessed the EAP for
problems related to alcohol and drug
use? How many of these employees
have had their problems resolved
successfully?
F. Costs and Benefits
We are particularly interested in the
costs and benefits you have experienced
in planning and implementing a drugfree workplace program. In addition, we
are interested in knowing what you
estimate the costs to be of designing and
implementing other elements of a drugfree workplace program. Please provide
examples and data to support your
answers to the following questions:
F1. What costs have you incurred
from your efforts to reduce or eliminate
PO 00000
Frm 00008
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
57811
drugs or alcohol from the workplace?
Please provide the costs by type (e.g.,
personnel, training, equipment).
F2–a. What costs would be associated
with having a drug-free workplace
program (e.g., program implementation,
training, drug testing, EAP, restricted
work programs, personnel effects)?
F2–b. Would these costs be borne
disproportionately by small mines? If
so, please explain how and by how
much the costs would vary.
F3. What benefits have you derived
from your efforts to reduce or eliminate
alcohol or drugs from the workplace
(e.g., lower workers compensation costs,
reduced absenteeism, employee morale,
reduction in turnover, accident and
injury reduction and related cost
savings)?
Dated: September 29, 2005.
David G. Dye,
Acting Assistant Secretary for Mine Safety
and Health.
[FR Doc. 05–19846 Filed 9–29–05; 3:11 pm]
BILLING CODE 4510–43–P
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
40 CFR Part 62
[R06–OAR–2004–NM–0002; FRL–7979–4]
Approval and Promulgation of State
Plans for Designated Facilities and
Pollutants: Bernalillo County, NM;
Negative Declaration
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Proposed rule.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: EPA is approving three
negative declarations submitted by the
City of Albuquerque (Bernalillo County)
certifying that there are no existing
sources subject to the requirements of
sections 111(d) and 129 of the Clean Air
Act under their jurisdiction. These three
negative declarations are for Sulfuric
Acid Mist Emissions from Sulfuric Acid
Plants, Fluoride Emissions from
Phosphate Fertilizer Plants, and Total
Reduced Sulfur Emissions from Kraft
Pulp Mills. This is a direct final rule
action without prior notice and
comment because this action is deemed
noncontroversial.
DATES: Written comments must be
received by November 3, 2005.
ADDRESSES: Comments may be
submitted electronically, by mail, by
facsimile, or through hand delivery/
courier by following the detailed
instructions provided under the ‘‘Public
Participation’’ heading in the
Supplemental Information section of
E:\FR\FM\04OCP1.SGM
04OCP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 191 (Tuesday, October 4, 2005)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 57808-57811]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-19846]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
Mine Safety and Health Administration
30 CFR Parts 46, 48, 50, 56, 57, 75, and 77
RIN 1219-AB41
Use of or Impairment From Alcohol and Other Drugs on Mine
Property
AGENCY: Mine Safety and Health Administration (MSHA), Labor.
ACTION: Advance notice of proposed rulemaking; notice of public
meetings; close of record.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: Because of the inherent dangers present in all mining
environments, we are considering regulatory and non-regulatory
approaches to address the risks and hazards to miner safety from the
use of or impairment from alcohol and other drugs, and are soliciting
information from the public to help determine how to proceed.
DATES: Comments to this advance notice of proposed rulemaking must be
received by November 27, 2005.
We will hold seven public meetings to gather additional
information. The dates and locations are listed in the Public Meetings
section under SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION. Individuals or organizations
wishing to make presentations for the record are asked to submit a
request to us at least five days prior to the meeting date; however,
those who do not submit a request in advance will be given an
opportunity to speak.
ADDRESSES: Comments must include Regulation Identifier Number (RIN)
1219-AB41 and may be submitted by any of the following methods:
Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://www.regulations.gov.
Follow the instructions for submitting comments.
E-mail to zzMSHA-comments@dol.gov. Include RIN 1219-AB41
in the subject line of the message.
Fax: (202) 693-9441.
Regular Mail or Hand Delivery: MSHA, Office of Standards,
Regulations, and Variances, 1100 Wilson Blvd., Room 2350, Arlington,
Virginia 22209-3939.
Access to Docket: We post all comments received without
change, including any personal information provided, at https://
www.msha.gov under the ``Rules & Regs'' link. The public docket may be
viewed at our Office of Standards, Regulations, and Variances, 1100
Wilson Blvd., Room 2349, Arlington, Virginia.
We maintain a listserve on our Web site that enables
subscribers to receive e-mail notification when we publish rulemaking
documents in the Federal Register. To subscribe to the listserve, visit
our site at https://www.msha.gov/subscriptions/subscribe.aspx.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Rebecca J. Smith, Acting Director,
Office of Standards, Regulations, and Variances at 202-693-9440
(voice), 202-693-9441 (fax), or smith.rebecca@dol.gov (e-mail).
Outline of ANPRM
This outline will assist you in finding information in the
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section of this document.
Supplementary Information
I. Public Meetings
II. Introduction
III. Background
IV. Issues
A. Nature, Extent, and Impact of the Problem
B. Prohibited Substances and Impaired Miners
C. Training
D. Inquiries Following Accidents
E. Drug-Free Workplace Programs
F. Costs and Benefits
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Public Meetings
The public meetings will begin at 9 a.m. and end after the last
speaker testifies (in any event not later than 5 p.m.) on the following
dates:
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Date Location Phone
------------------------------------------------------------------------
October 24, 2005............ Little America 801-363-6781
Hotel, 500 S Main
Street, Salt Lake
City, UT 84101.
October 26, 2005............ Hyatt Regency St. 800-233-1234
Louis, 1 St. Louis
Union Station, St.
Louis, MO 63103.
October 28, 2005............ Sheraton Birmingham, 205-324-5000
2101 Richard
Arrington Jr. Blvd.
North, Birmingham,
AL 35203.
October 31, 2005............ Sheraton Suites 859-268-0060
Lexington, 2601
Richmond Rd.,
Lexington, KY 40506.
November 2, 2005............ Marriott Town 304-345-6500
Center, 200 Lee St.
East, Charleston,
WV 25301.
November 4, 2005............ Hyatt Regency 800 233-1234
Pittsburgh Int'l
Airport, 1111
Airport Blvd.,
Pittsburgh, PA
15231.
November 8, 2005............ MSHA Conference Room 202 693-9440
25th Floor, 1100
Wilson Blvd.,
Arlington, VA 22209.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
The meetings will begin with an opening statement from us, followed
by an opportunity for members of the public to make oral presentations
to our panel. You do not have to make a written request to speak. You
will speak in the order that you sign in. Any unallotted time will be
made available for persons making same-day requests. At the discretion
of our presiding official, the time allocated to speakers for your
presentation may be limited. We will accept written comments and data
for the record from any interested party, including those not
presenting oral statements. The comment period will close on November
27, 2005.
The meetings will be conducted in an informal manner. We may ask
questions of you. Although formal rules of evidence or cross
examination will not apply, we may exercise discretion to ensure the
orderly progress of the meeting and may exclude irrelevant or unduly
repetitious material and questions.
A verbatim transcript of the meetings will be included in the
rulemaking record. Copies of this transcript will be available to the
public, and can be accessed at https://www.msha.gov.
II. Introduction
Given that our accident investigations do not routinely include an
inquiry into the use of alcohol or other drugs as a contributing
factor, there may be many instances in which alcohol or other drugs
were involved in accidents and are not reported to us or that we do not
uncover during investigations. Our preliminary review of our fatal and
non-fatal mine accident records revealed a number of instances in which
alcohol or other drugs or drug paraphernalia were found or reported, or
in which the post-accident toxicology screen revealed the presence of
alcohol or other drugs.
[[Page 57809]]
We are concerned that miners' use of and impairment from alcohol
and other drugs can create considerable (but preventable) risks to
miner safety. To the extent that use and abuse of alcohol and other
drugs by miners is prevalent, it reflects problems in the community in
general and the labor force as a whole.
The Department of Health and Human Services, Substance Abuse and
Mental Health Services Administration's (SAMHSA) 2003 National Survey
on Drug Use and Health (formerly the National Household Survey on Drug
Abuse) shows that these community problems are also found in the labor
force. The survey reports that of 16.7 million illicit drug users age
18 or older, 12.4 million (74.3 percent) were employed either full or
part time. In addition, 14.9 million (77 percent) of the 19.4 million
adults, age 18 or older, characterized with abuse of or dependence on
alcohol or drugs were employed. The Bureau of Labor Statistics analyzed
1998 data from its Census of Fatal Occupational Injuries and estimated
that 19 percent of the nation's workforce who die on the job test
positive for alcohol and other drugs.\1\ Similarly, a 1993 analysis of
toxicology data on injured workers' blood alcohol concentration
estimated that ten percent of fatal work injuries and five percent of
non-fatal work injuries overall involved acute alcohol impairment.\2\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ Weber, W., and Cox, C. ``Work-Related Fatal Injuries in
1998,'' Compensations and Working Conditions, Spring 2001, pp. 27-
29.
\2\ Zwerling, C. ``Current practice and Experience in Drug and
Alcohol Testing.'' Bulletin on Narcotics, vol. 45 (1993), pp. 155-
196.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
SAMHSA's 2000 National Household Survey on Drug Abuse analyzes
alcohol and other drug use and abuse by industry sector. Notably, the
construction and mining industries have the highest percentage of
workers who reported current illicit drug use \3\ or have an alcohol
dependence disorder or alcohol abuse disorder. Nearly one in seven
workers in these industries report having a serious alcohol problem.
The report shows the following rates of use for the mining and
construction industries: 15.7% past month heavy alcohol use; 12.3% past
month any illicit drug use; 10.9% past year dependence or abuse of
alcohol; and 3.6% past year dependence or abuse of illicit drugs.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\3\ The survey defined current illicit drug use as the use of
marijuana, cocaine, heroin, hallucinogens, inhalants or non-medical
use of prescription-type pain relievers, tranquilizers, stimulants,
or sedatives in the past 30 days.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Using drugs or alcohol can impair a miner's coordination and
judgment significantly at a time when he or she needs to be alert,
aware, and capable of performing complicated tasks. Even prescription
medications may affect a miner's perceptions and reaction time. Mining
is a complicated and hazardous occupation, and a clear focus on the
work at hand is a crucial component of workplace safety. Alcohol- or
drug-impaired miners endanger themselves as well as their co-workers.
A number of mine operators recognize this problem, and require
applicants for employment to pass a pre-employment drug screening. At a
summit held on December 18, 2004, some mine operators stated that a
substantial number of job applicants are unable to pass the initial
drug screen.
III. Background
Since the late 1980s, the federal government has implemented a
number of programs aimed at reducing the use of alcohol and other drugs
in the workplace. The Anti-Drug Abuse Act of 1986 (Pub. L. 99-570),
among other things, directed the Secretary of Labor to initiate efforts
to address the issue. Subsequently, Executive Order 12564, Drug-Free
Federal Workplace, established federal drug-free workplaces, making it
a condition of employment for all federal employees to refrain from
using illegal drugs. The Drug-Free Workplace Act of 1988, 41 U.S.C.
701, et seq., requires Federal contractors and grantees to have drug-
free workplaces, and the Drug-Free Workplace Act of 1998, 15 U.S.C.
654, established grant programs that assist small businesses in
developing drug-free workplace programs. To protect public safety, the
Omnibus Transportation Employee Testing Act of 1991, Public Law 102-
143, requires transportation industry employers to conduct drug and
alcohol testing for employees in ``safety-sensitive'' positions,
creating a model that many non-regulated employers follow.
In support of the President's goal of lowering the rate of illegal
drug use, the Department of Labor's (DOL) Working Partners for an
Alcohol- and Drug-Free Workplace (Working Partners) public outreach
campaign raises awareness about the impact of alcohol and other drug
use on businesses and encourages and assists employers to implement
drug-free workplace programs that protect worker safety and health and
respect worker rights. DOL's Occupational Safety and Health
Administration (OSHA) recognizes that drug and alcohol impaired workers
constitute a safety hazard and strongly supports comprehensive drug-
free workforce programs, especially in certain workplace environments,
such as those involving safety-sensitive duties like operating
machinery.\4\ Over the past year and a half, OSHA has implemented a
number of strategies in support of this statement. For example, OSHA
along with MSHA and DOL's Working Partners program, formed an alliance
with four international labor unions \5\ focused exclusively on
improving worker health and safety through drug-free workplace
programs, and an OSHA/National Federation of Independent Business
alliance agreement specifically includes promoting drug-free workplaces
as a goal. OSHA also developed a Web page on workplace substance abuse,
and OSHA and DOL staff have presented at conferences and written
articles for publications attracting occupational safety and health
professionals.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\4\ OSHA, ``Safety and Health Topics, Workplace Substance
Abuse,'' https://www.osha.gov/SLTC/substanceabuse.
\5\ International Union of Operating Engineers; United
Brotherhood of Carpenters and Joiners of America; International
Association of Bridge, Structural Steel, Ornamental and Reinforcing
Iron Workers; and International Brotherhood of Boilermakers, Iron
Ship Builders, Blacksmiths, Forgers and Helpers.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
We currently address the presence and use of intoxicating beverages
and narcotics at metal and nonmetal mines. Sections 56.20001 and
57.20001 of 30 CFR state:
Intoxicating beverages and narcotics shall not be permitted or
used in or around mines. Persons under the influence of alcohol or
narcotics shall not be permitted on the job.
Between January 1, 2000 and June 30, 2005, penalties were assessed
for 75 violations of Sec. 56.20001 and for three violations of Sec.
57.20001. Our regulations contain no similar requirement for coal
mines.
We have initiated a number of education and outreach efforts to
raise awareness in the mining industry of the safety hazards stemming
from the use of alcohol and other drugs. We, in partnership with the
Joseph A. Holmes Safety Association, established the Professional Miner
Program to recognize miners who have worked injury-free for at least
three years. Miners who have been recognized as Professional Miners
sign a pledge which includes a commitment to ``work to ensure a safe,
healthy, and alcohol and drug-free workplace.'' To date, approximately
15,500 miners have taken this pledge.
We participate in the drug-free work place alliance mentioned above
to provide union members and the construction industry with
information, guidance and access to training resources that will help
them understand the benefits of drug-free
[[Page 57810]]
workplace programs and protect employee health and safety. Although
this alliance focuses on the construction industry, a substantial
number of the union members work on mine property.
On December 8, 2004, we co-sponsored with the states of Kentucky,
Virginia and West Virginia, a one-day summit for individuals involved
with coal mining operations and activities in the Southern Appalachian
region. The summit brought together industry, labor, state and federal
government officials, and public health experts to share information,
expertise, and experience in dealing with the use of or impairment from
alcohol and other drugs on mine property. At the summit, industry
representatives expressed concerns about the problems related to the
use of drugs and alcohol in mines. Several coal mine operators
described the effectiveness of their drug-free workplace programs and
expressed their concern that such programs were not universal in the
industry.
Along with Virginia and West Virginia, we are participating in
Kentucky's Mine Substance Abuse Task Force. The task force currently
meets monthly to examine options for eliminating the use of or
impairment from alcohol and other drugs on mine property.
During the first four months of 2005, in our annual Spring Thaw
meetings held by each of the 51 field offices of our metal and nonmetal
program area, we included presentations and discussion of drug and
alcohol abuse to raise awareness and provide information to mine
operators.
Our State Grants Program awards federal grants to 49 states and the
Navajo Nation. Our 2006 Solicitation for Grant Applications, sent out
in July, 2005, requests that applicants include substance abuse
training as part of new miner and annual refresher training curriculum.
With assistance from DOL's Working Partners program, we will be
developing materials to assist in conducting this training. Further,
our National Mine Health and Safety Academy is producing an awareness
video on the hazards of alcohol and other drugs. This video will be
used for new miner and annual refresher training.
A number of mine operators have voluntarily implemented drug-free
workplace programs, and many report that these programs have improved
workplace safety and reduced workers' compensation costs. Additionally,
some of these operators have told us that miners at their mines are
supportive of these programs. However, the adoption of these programs
is far from being an industry-wide practice. Many miners, particularly
those working in small mines are not likely to have access to these
programs.
IV. Issues
We are seeking supporting information or data that will help us
evaluate whether there is a need for additional federal action to
address safety risks stemming from alcohol and other drug use by
miners, and if so, whether this should involve rulemaking and what that
regulation should include. In general, we are seeking information and
comment on the extent of alcohol and other drug use problems in the
mining industry and the impact on safety and health, and the types of
programs currently in place and their effectiveness. Additionally, we
need to assess both the costs and benefits of any intended federal
action. We encourage the public to respond to the questions posed
below. We also invite suggestions on alternatives or supplements to
rulemaking that we should pursue. Please be as specific as possible in
your responses to the questions and in suggesting alternatives.
Providing specific examples, as well as cost and benefit estimates
where possible, will help us evaluate and analyze your comments.
A. Nature, Extent, and Impact of the Problem
We believe that the use and misuse of alcohol and other drugs in
the mining community and mining workplace create a preventable risk to
the safety of miners. We are concerned that impaired miners can
jeopardize their own safety and the safety of their fellow miners.
Please provide examples and data to support your answers to the
following questions:
A1. What specific substances are most prevalent and pose the
greatest threats to mine safety and health? Please include comments on
``controlled substances,'' illegal or illicit drugs, alcohol,
inhalants, prescription and over-the-counter drugs, and any other
substances you believe may create safety hazards when used or misused
by miners.
A2. Based on your experience and knowledge of the industry, how
widespread is the use or misuse of alcohol or other drugs in the mining
workplace?
A3. How severe a risk does the use or misuse of alcohol and other
drugs pose to miners' safety?
A4. What accidents or injuries at your mine in the last five years
have involved alcohol or other drugs?
B. Prohibited Substances and Impaired Miners
Our existing metal and non-metal standards [30 CFR 56/57.20001], as
stated above, require:
Intoxicating beverages and narcotics shall not be permitted or
used in or around mines. Persons under the influence of alcohol or
narcotics shall not be permitted on the job.
No similar standard applies to coal mines. Please provide examples and
data to support your answers to the following questions:
B1. Should we revise this existing metal and non-metal standard and
establish a standard for coal mines? If so, how?
B2. What substances should be prohibited? Please include comments
on controlled substances, alcohol, misuse of prescription and over the
counter drugs, and inhalants.
B3. How should impairment be determined, and who should make the
determination?
B4. What actions should operators be required to take once an
impaired miner is identified (e.g., remove from site, send home for the
day, refer to the Employee Assistance Program or elsewhere for
assessment, send for drug test, terminate, fine, or other actions)?
B5. What policy or procedures do you have regarding employees who
are using legally and properly prescribed drugs that may cause
impairment?
C. Training
Parts 46 and 48 of 30 CFR specify training requirements for
supervisors and miners. Our regulations currently do not require
training in the prevention of alcohol and other drug misuse. Please
provide examples and data to support your answers to the following
questions:
C1. Should our regulations address training in the prevention of
alcohol and other drug misuse? If so, how?
C2. Who should receive this training (e.g., supervisors, managers,
foremen, miners, miners' representatives?)
C3. What topics should be included?
C4. What training do you provide to address alcohol and other drug
misuse?
D. Inquiries Following Accidents
Section 50.11 of 30 CFR (Investigation of accidents) requires mine
operators to report and investigate accidents, and establishes criteria
for the investigation and the report. Please provide examples and data
to support your answers to the following questions:
D1. Should we revise 30 CFR 50.11 to address alcohol and other drug
use inquiries by mine operators during accident investigations? Section
50.11 provides as follows:
[[Page 57811]]
Sec. 50.11 Investigation.
(a) After notification of an accident by an operator, the MSHA
District Manager will promptly decide whether to conduct an accident
investigation and will promptly inform the operator of his decision.
If MSHA decides to investigate an accident, it will initiate the
investigation within 24 hours of notification.
(b) Each operator of a mine shall investigate each accident and
each occupational injury at the mine. Each operator of a mine shall
develop a report of each investigation. No operator may use Form
7000-1 as a report, except that an operator of a mine at which fewer
than twenty miners are employed may, with respect to that mine, use
Form 7000-1 as an investigation report respecting an occupational
injury not related to an accident. No operator may use an
investigation or an investigation report conducted or prepared by
MSHA to comply with this paragraph. An operator shall submit a copy
of any investigation report to MSHA at its request. Each report
prepared by the operator shall include,
(1) The date and hour of occurrence;
(2) The date the investigation began;
(3) The names of individuals participating in the investigation;
(4) A description of the site;
(5) An explanation of the accident or injury, including a
description of any equipment involved and relevant events before and
after the occurrence, and any explanation of the cause of any
injury, the cause of any accident or cause of any other event which
caused an injury;
(6) The name, occupation, and experience of any miner involved;
(7) A sketch, where pertinent, including dimensions depicting
the occurrence;
(8) A description of steps taken to prevent a similar occurrence
in the future; and
(9) Identification of any report submitted under Sec. 50.20 of
this part.
D2. What type of alcohol and other drug use inquiries should be
made after accidents (e.g., questioning, drug testing)?
D3. What degree of accident or injury should trigger an inquiry
(all, fatal, lost-time, others)?
D4. How should the information collected in the inquiry be used,
and by whom?
D5. What actions should be required if it is determined that the
use of alcohol or other drugs was a contributing factor or cause of the
accident?
E. Drug-Free Workplace Programs
Although our regulations currently do not require programs to
address the safety hazards that the presence of alcohol and other drugs
in the workplace may cause, some mine operators have voluntarily put
these programs in place. Typically, such a program, often called a
drug-free workplace program, includes at least one of the following
five components: drug-free workplace policy; employee education;
supervisory training; drug testing; and an employee assistance program.
Please provide examples and data to support your answers to the
following questions:
E1. Do you have a drug-free workplace program at your mine, or have
you instituted any of the above mentioned components, even if not
referred to as a drug-free workplace? Please provide a copy of your
program policy and procedures. Is this program part of a broader
program?
E2. If you have a drug-free workplace policy or program:
E2-a. What prompted you to initiate your program?
E2-b. What components does your program have?
E2-c. Which of your program's components do you feel are most
critical and/or effective, and why?
E2-d. Have you been able to document any improvement as a result of
your program?
E2-e. Please provide any data that demonstrate the extent of the
problem at your mine and the effectiveness of your program in improving
safety at your mine.
E2-f. What issues/problems have you encountered in implementing
your program and how have you resolved them?
E2-g. What actions are taken for miners who violate the terms of
the policy?
E3. If you previously had a drug-free workplace program, what did
it include? Why was it discontinued?
E4. If you conduct supervisory training on drug issues, how are
supervisors taught to recognize and handle employees who may have
alcohol and/or other drug problems? Please elaborate on how supervisors
make these determinations.
E5. Do you have an employee assistance program, and if so, how many
employees have accessed the EAP for problems related to alcohol and
drug use? How many of these employees have had their problems resolved
successfully?
F. Costs and Benefits
We are particularly interested in the costs and benefits you have
experienced in planning and implementing a drug-free workplace program.
In addition, we are interested in knowing what you estimate the costs
to be of designing and implementing other elements of a drug-free
workplace program. Please provide examples and data to support your
answers to the following questions:
F1. What costs have you incurred from your efforts to reduce or
eliminate drugs or alcohol from the workplace? Please provide the costs
by type (e.g., personnel, training, equipment).
F2-a. What costs would be associated with having a drug-free
workplace program (e.g., program implementation, training, drug
testing, EAP, restricted work programs, personnel effects)?
F2-b. Would these costs be borne disproportionately by small mines?
If so, please explain how and by how much the costs would vary.
F3. What benefits have you derived from your efforts to reduce or
eliminate alcohol or drugs from the workplace (e.g., lower workers
compensation costs, reduced absenteeism, employee morale, reduction in
turnover, accident and injury reduction and related cost savings)?
Dated: September 29, 2005.
David G. Dye,
Acting Assistant Secretary for Mine Safety and Health.
[FR Doc. 05-19846 Filed 9-29-05; 3:11 pm]
BILLING CODE 4510-43-P