Gray Portland Cement and Cement Clinker From Japan and Mexico, 57617-57620 [05-19593]
Download as PDF
57617
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 190 / Monday, October 3, 2005 / Notices
Seventh Street, SW., Room 7212,
Washington, DC 20410–7000; telephone
202–708–1934 (this is not a toll-free
number). Persons with speech or
hearing impairments may access this
number through TTY by calling the tollfree Federal Information Relay Service
at 800–877–8339.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On March
21, 2005, HUD published its FY2005
SuperNOFA for HUD’s Competitive
Grant Programs. The Housing
Opportunities for Persons with AIDS
(HOPWA) Program NOFA competition,
which was included in the SuperNOFA,
closed on June 9, 2005. After reviewing
and rating HOPWA applications
submitted in response to the
SuperNOFA, HUD anticipated that
assistance would remain available for
additional awards. As a result, on
August 22, 2005 (70 FR 48970), HUD
published in the Federal Register a
NOFA for a second round of HOPWA
funding. The application deadline for
the second competition was October 6,
2005. Because of the widespread effects
of Hurricane Katrina, HUD is extending
the application deadline for the
HOPWA second round competition to
October 13, 2005.
Dated: September 27, 2005.
Pamela H. Patenaude,
Assistant Secretary, for Community Planning
and Development.
[FR Doc. 05–19755 Filed 9–28–05; 3:27 pm]
BILLING CODE 4210–29–P
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Bureau of Indian Affairs
DATES:
Effective October 3, 2005.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
George T. Skibine, Director, Office of
Indian Gaming Management, Office of
the Deputy Assistant Secretary—Policy
and Economic Development,
Washington, DC 20240, (202) 219–4066.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Under
Section 11(d)(7)(D) of the Indian
Gaming Regulatory Act of 1988 (IGRA),
Public Law 100–497, 25 U.S.C. 2710, the
Secretary of the Interior must publish in
the Federal Register notice of any
Tribal-State compact that is approved,
or considered to have been approved for
the purpose of engaging in Class III
gaming activities on Indian lands. The
Acting Principal Deputy Assistant
Secretary-Indian Affairs, Department of
the Interior, through his delegated
authority did not approve or disapprove
these compacts before the date that is 45
days after the date these compacts were
submitted. These compacts authorize
these Indian tribes to engage in certain
Class III gaming activities, provides for
certain geographical exclusivity, limits
the number of gaming machines at
existing racetracks, and prohibits nontribal operation of certain machines and
covered games. Therefore, pursuant to
25 U.S.C. 2710(d)(7)(C), these compacts
are considered to have been approved,
but only to the extent they are
consistent with IGRA.
Dated: September 20, 2005.
Michael D. Olsen,
Acting Principal Deputy Assistant Secretary—
Indian Affairs.
[FR Doc. 05–19733 Filed 9–30–05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310–4N–P
Indian Gaming
Bureau of Indian Affairs,
Interior.
ACTION: Notice of Class III Gaming
Compacts taking effect.
AGENCY:
INTERNATIONAL TRADE
COMMISSION
SUMMARY: Notice is given that the
Tribal-State compact between the
Thlopthlocco Tribal Town and the State
of Oklahoma, and the Tribal-State
compact between the Ponca Tribe of
Oklahoma and the State of Oklahoma
are considered to have been approved
and are in effect.
[Investigation Nos. 731–TA–451 and 461
(Second Review)]
Gray Portland Cement and Cement
Clinker From Japan and Mexico
United States International
Trade Commission.
ACTION: Institution of five-year reviews
concerning the antidumping duty orders
AGENCY:
on gray portland cement and cement
clinker from Japan and Mexico.
SUMMARY: The Commission hereby gives
notice that it has instituted reviews
pursuant to section 751(c) of the Tariff
Act of 1930 (19 U.S.C. 1675(c)) (the Act)
to determine whether revocation of the
antidumping duty orders on gray
portland cement and cement clinker
from Japan and Mexico would be likely
to lead to continuation or recurrence of
material injury. Pursuant to section
751(c)(2) of the Act, interested parties
are requested to respond to this notice
by submitting the information specified
below to the Commission; 1 to be
assured of consideration, the deadline
for responses is November 22, 2005.
Comments on the adequacy of responses
may be filed with the Commission by
December 16, 2005. For further
information concerning the conduct of
these reviews and rules of general
application, consult the Commission’s
Rules of Practice and Procedure, part
201, subparts A through E (19 CFR part
201), and part 207, subparts A, D, E, and
F (19 CFR part 207).
DATES:
Effective October 3, 2005.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Mary Messer (202–205–3193), Office of
Investigations, U.S. International Trade
Commission, 500 E Street SW.,
Washington, DC 20436. Hearingimpaired persons can obtain
information on this matter by contacting
the Commission’s TDD terminal on 202–
205–1810. Persons with mobility
impairments who will need special
assistance in gaining access to the
Commission should contact the Office
of the Secretary at 202–205–2000.
General information concerning the
Commission may also be obtained by
accessing its Internet server (https://
www.usitc.gov). The public record for
these reviews may be viewed on the
Commission’s electronic docket (EDIS)
at https://edis.usitc.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background. On the dates listed
below, the Department of Commerce
issued antidumping duty orders on the
subject imports:
Order date
Product/country
Inv. No.
8/30/90 ............................................
5/10/91 ............................................
Gray portland cement & clinker/Mexico ...............................................
Gray portland cement & clinker/Japan .................................................
731–TA–451 .....
731–TA–461 .....
1 No response to this request for information is
required if a currently valid Office of Management
and Budget (OMB) number is not displayed; the
OMB number is 3117–0016/USITC No. 06–5–140,
VerDate Aug<31>2005
17:26 Sep 30, 2005
Jkt 205001
expiration date June 30, 2008. Public reporting
burden for the request is estimated to average 10
hours per response. Please send comments
regarding the accuracy of this burden estimate to
PO 00000
Frm 00067
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
FR cite
55 FR 35443.
56 FR 21658.
the Office of Investigations, U.S. International Trade
Commission, 500 E Street, SW., Washington, DC
20436.
E:\FR\FM\03OCN1.SGM
03OCN1
57618
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 190 / Monday, October 3, 2005 / Notices
Following five-year reviews by
Commerce and the Commission,
effective November 15, 2000, Commerce
issued a continuation of the
antidumping duty orders on imports of
gray portland cement and cement
clinker from Japan and Mexico (65 FR
68979). The Commission is now
conducting second reviews to determine
whether revocation of the order would
be likely to lead to continuation or
recurrence of material injury to the
domestic industry within a reasonably
foreseeable time. It will assess the
adequacy of interested party responses
to this notice of institution to determine
whether to conduct full reviews or
expedited reviews. The Commission’s
determinations in any expedited
reviews will be based on the facts
available, which may include
information provided in response to this
notice.
Definitions. The following definitions
apply to these reviews:
(1) Subject Merchandise is the class or
kind of merchandise that is within the
scope of the five-year reviews, as
defined by the Department of
Commerce.
(2) The Subject Countries in these
reviews Japan and Mexico.
(3) The Domestic Like Product is the
domestically produced product or
products which are like, or in the
absence of like, most similar in
characteristics and uses with, the
Subject Merchandise. In its original and
full five-year determinations, the
Commission defined a single Domestic
Like Product consisting of gray portland
cement and cement clinker.
(4) The Domestic Industry is the U.S.
producers as a whole of the Domestic
Like Product, or those producers whose
collective output of the Domestic Like
Product constitutes a major proportion
of the total domestic production of the
product. In its original determinations,
the Commission defined the Domestic
Industry as producers of gray portland
cement and cement clinker, including
‘‘grinding only’’ operations. In both
original determinations, the
Commission concluded that
‘‘appropriate circumstances’’ existed for
a regional analysis of the industry;
however, the Commission found
different regions to be appropriate based
on the facts of each investigation. In its
full five-year review determinations, the
Commission took into account the
Commission’s prior regional industry
definitions in its analysis and found
separate regional industries, which
corresponded, or were similar, to those
defined in the original investigations.
In its original determination
concerning Mexico, two Commissioners
VerDate Aug<31>2005
17:26 Sep 30, 2005
Jkt 205001
found that either the Southern Tier
Region (the States of Florida, Alabama,
Mississippi, Louisiana, Texas, New
Mexico, Arizona, and California) or the
alternative Southern Tier Region
(excluding northern California and the
inland counties of the Gulf States) was
appropriate and that no compelling case
was made for one rather than the other.
For purposes of the original
determination, they used the Southern
Tier Region because it was the more
difficult region within which to reach
an affirmative finding. One
Commissioner found that the alternative
Southern Tier Region was appropriate.
In its five-year review determination
concerning Mexico, the Commission
found the regional industry to consist of
producers in the Southern Tier Region.
In its original determination concerning
Japan, the Commission found the
regional industry to consist of producers
in Southern California; certain
Commissioners found the regional
industry to consist of producers in the
State of California. In its five-year
review determination concerning Japan,
the Commission found the regional
industry to consist of producers in the
State of California. For purposes of this
notice, you should report information
separately on each of the following
Domestic Industries: (1) Producers of
gray portland cement and cement
clinker, including ‘‘grinding only’’
operations, located in the Southern Tier
Region; (2) producers of gray portland
cement and cement clinker, including
‘‘grinding only’’ operations, located in
Southern California; (3) producers of
gray portland cement and cement
clinker, including ‘‘grinding only’’
operations, located in the State of
California; and (4) producers of gray
portland cement and cement clinker,
including ‘‘grinding only’’ operations,
located in the United States as a whole.
(5) An Importer is any person or firm
engaged, either directly or through a
parent company or subsidiary, in
importing the Subject Merchandise into
the United States from a foreign
manufacturer or through its selling
agent.
Participation in the reviews and
public service list. Persons, including
industrial users of the Subject
Merchandise and, if the merchandise is
sold at the retail level, representative
consumer organizations, wishing to
participate in the reviews as parties
must file an entry of appearance with
the Secretary to the Commission, as
provided in section 201.11(b)(4) of the
Commission’s rules, no later than 21
days after publication of this notice in
the Federal Register. The Secretary will
maintain a public service list containing
PO 00000
Frm 00068
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
the names and addresses of all persons,
or their representatives, who are parties
to the reviews.
Former Commission employees who
are seeking to appear in Commission
five-year reviews are reminded that they
are required, pursuant to 19 CFR 201.15,
to seek Commission approval if the
matter in which they are seeking to
appear was pending in any manner or
form during their Commission
employment. The Commission is
seeking guidance as to whether a second
transition five-year review is the ‘‘same
particular matter’’ as the underlying
original investigation for purposes of 19
CFR 201.15 and 18 U.S.C. 207, the post
employment statute for Federal
employees. Former employees may seek
informal advice from Commission ethics
officials with respect to this and the
related issue of whether the employee’s
participation was ‘‘personal and
substantial.’’ However, any informal
consultation will not relieve former
employees of the obligation to seek
approval to appear from the
Commission under its rule 201.15. For
ethics advice, contact Carol McCue
Verratti, Deputy Agency Ethics Official,
at 202–205–3088.
Limited disclosure of business
proprietary information (BPI) under an
administrative protective order (APO)
and APO service list. Pursuant to
section 207.7(a) of the Commission’s
rules, the Secretary will make BPI
submitted in these reviews available to
authorized applicants under the APO
issued in the reviews, provided that the
application is made no later than 21
days after publication of this notice in
the Federal Register. Authorized
applicants must represent interested
parties, as defined in 19 U.S.C. 1677(9),
who are parties to the reviews. A
separate service list will be maintained
by the Secretary for those parties
authorized to receive BPI under the
APO.
Certification. Pursuant to section
207.3 of the Commission’s rules, any
person submitting information to the
Commission in connection with these
reviews must certify that the
information is accurate and complete to
the best of the submitter’s knowledge. In
making the certification, the submitter
will be deemed to consent, unless
otherwise specified, for the
Commission, its employees, and
contract personnel to use the
information provided in any other
reviews or investigations of the same or
comparable products which the
Commission conducts under Title VII of
the Act, or in internal audits and
investigations relating to the programs
E:\FR\FM\03OCN1.SGM
03OCN1
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 190 / Monday, October 3, 2005 / Notices
and operations of the Commission
pursuant to 5 U.S.C. Appendix 3.
Written submissions. Pursuant to
section 207.61 of the Commission’s
rules, each interested party response to
this notice must provide the information
specified below. The deadline for filing
such responses is November 22, 2005.
Pursuant to section 207.62(b) of the
Commission’s rules, eligible parties (as
specified in Commission rule
207.62(b)(1)) may also file comments
concerning the adequacy of responses to
the notice of institution and whether the
Commission should conduct expedited
or full reviews. The deadline for filing
such comments is December 16, 2005.
All written submissions must conform
with the provisions of sections 201.8
and 207.3 of the Commission’s rules and
any submissions that contain BPI must
also conform with the requirements of
sections 201.6 and 207.7 of the
Commission’s rules. The Commission’s
rules do not authorize filing of
submissions with the Secretary by
facsimile or electronic means, except to
the extent permitted by section 201.8 of
the Commission’s rules, as amended, 67
FR 68036 (November 8, 2002). Also, in
accordance with sections 201.16(c) and
207.3 of the Commission’s rules, each
document filed by a party to the reviews
must be served on all other parties to
the reviews (as identified by either the
public or APO service list as
appropriate), and a certificate of service
must accompany the document (if you
are not a party to the reviews you do not
need to serve your response).
Inability to provide requested
information. Pursuant to section
207.61(c) of the Commission’s rules, any
interested party that cannot furnish the
information requested by this notice in
the requested form and manner shall
notify the Commission at the earliest
possible time, provide a full explanation
of why it cannot provide the requested
information, and indicate alternative
forms in which it can provide
equivalent information. If an interested
party does not provide this notification
(or the Commission finds the
explanation provided in the notification
inadequate) and fails to provide a
complete response to this notice, the
Commission may take an adverse
inference against the party pursuant to
section 776(b) of the Act in making its
determinations in the reviews.
Information To Be Provided in
Response To this Notice of Institution:
Please provide the requested
information separately for each
Domestic Industry, as defined by the
Commission in its original and full fiveyear review determinations. If you are a
domestic producer, union/worker
VerDate Aug<31>2005
17:26 Sep 30, 2005
Jkt 205001
group, or trade/business association;
import/export Subject Merchandise
from more than one Subject Country; or
produce Subject Merchandise in more
than one Subject Country, you may file
a single response. If you do so, please
ensure that your response to each
question includes the information
requested for each pertinent Subject
Country. As used below, the term
‘‘firm’’ includes any related firms.
(1) The name and address of your firm
or entity (including World Wide Web
address if available) and name,
telephone number, fax number, and Email address of the certifying official.
(2) A statement indicating whether
your firm/entity is a U.S. producer of
the Domestic Like Product, a U.S. union
or worker group, a U.S. importer of the
Subject Merchandise, a foreign producer
or exporter of the Subject Merchandise,
a U.S. or foreign trade or business
association, or another interested party
(including an explanation). If you are a
union/worker group or trade/business
association, identify the firms in which
your workers are employed or which are
members of your association.
(3) A statement indicating whether
your firm/entity is willing to participate
in these reviews by providing
information requested by the
Commission.
(4) A statement of the likely effects of
the revocation of the antidumping duty
order on the Domestic Industries in
general and/or your firm/entity
specifically. In your response, please
discuss the various factors specified in
section 752(a) of the Act (19 U.S.C.
1675a(a)) including the likely volume of
subject imports, likely price effects of
subject imports, and likely impact of
imports of Subject Merchandise on the
Domestic Industries.
(5) A list of all known and currently
operating U.S. producers of the
Domestic Like Product. Identify any
known related parties and the nature of
the relationship as defined in section
771(4)(B) of the Act (19 U.S.C.
1677(4)(B)).
(6) A list of all known and currently
operating U.S. importers of the Subject
Merchandise and producers of the
Subject Merchandise in the Subject
Country(ies) that currently export or
have exported Subject Merchandise to
the United States or other countries after
1999.
(7) If you are a U.S. producer of the
Domestic Like Product, provide the
following information on your firm’s
operations on that product during
calendar year 2004 (report quantity data
in short tons and value data in U.S.
dollars, f.o.b. plant). If you are a union/
worker group or trade/business
PO 00000
Frm 00069
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
57619
association, provide the information, on
an aggregate basis, for the firms in
which your workers are employed/
which are members of your association.
(a) Production (quantity) and, if
known, an estimate of the percentage of
total U.S. production of the Domestic
Like Product accounted for by your
firm’s(s’) production;
(b) The quantity and value of U.S.
commercial shipments of the Domestic
Like Product produced in your U.S.
plant(s); and
(c) The quantity and value of U.S.
internal consumption/company
transfers of the Domestic Like Product
produced in your U.S. plant(s).
(8) If you are a U.S. importer or a
trade/business association of U.S.
importers of the Subject Merchandise
from the Subject Country(ies), provide
the following information on your
firm’s(s’) operations on that product
during calendar year 2004 (report
quantity data in short tons and value
data in U.S. dollars). If you are a trade/
business association, provide the
information, on an aggregate basis, for
the firms which are members of your
association.
(a) The quantity and value (landed,
duty-paid but not including
antidumping) of U.S. imports and, if
known, an estimate of the percentage of
total U.S. imports of Subject
Merchandise from the Subject
Country(ies) accounted for by your
firm’s(s’) imports;
(b) The quantity and value (f.o.b. U.S.
port, including antidumping duties) of
U.S. commercial shipments of Subject
Merchandise imported from each
Subject Country; and
(c) The quantity and value (f.o.b. U.S.
port, including antidumping duties) of
U.S. internal consumption/company
transfers of Subject Merchandise
imported from each Subject Country.
(9) If you are a producer, an exporter,
or a trade/business association of
producers or exporters of the Subject
Merchandise in the Subject
Country(ies), provide the following
information on your firm’s(s’)
operations on that product during
calendar year 2004 (report quantity data
in short tons and value data in U.S.
dollars, landed and duty-paid at the
U.S. port but not including antidumping
duties). If you are a trade/business
association, provide the information, on
an aggregate basis, for the firms which
are members of your association.
(a) Production (quantity) and, if
known, an estimate of the percentage of
total production of Subject Merchandise
in the Subject Country(ies) accounted
for by your firm’s(s’) production; and
E:\FR\FM\03OCN1.SGM
03OCN1
57620
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 190 / Monday, October 3, 2005 / Notices
(b) The quantity and value of your
firm’s(s’) exports to the United States of
Subject Merchandise and, if known, an
estimate of the percentage of total
exports to the United States of Subject
Merchandise from the Subject
Country(ies) accounted for by your
firm’s(s’) exports.
(10) Identify significant changes, if
any, in the supply and demand
conditions or business cycle for the
Domestic Like Product that have
occurred in the United States or in the
market for the Subject Merchandise in
the Subject Country(ies) after 1999, and
significant changes, if any, that are
likely to occur within a reasonably
foreseeable time. Supply conditions to
consider include technology;
production methods; development
efforts; ability to increase production
(including the shift of production
facilities used for other products and the
use, cost, or availability of major inputs
into production); and factors related to
the ability to shift supply among
different national markets (including
barriers to importation in foreign
markets or changes in market demand
abroad). Demand conditions to consider
include end uses and applications; the
existence and availability of substitute
products; and the level of competition
among the Domestic Like Product
produced in the United States, Subject
Merchandise produced in the Subject
Country(ies), and such merchandise
from other countries.
(11) (Optional) A statement of
whether you agree with the above
definitions of the Domestic Like Product
and Domestic Industries; if you disagree
with either or both of these definitions,
please explain why and provide
alternative definitions.
Authority: These reviews are being
conducted under authority of title VII of the
Tariff Act of 1930; this notice is published
pursuant to section 207.61 of the
Commission’s rules.
Issued: September 27, 2005.
By order of the Commission.
Marilyn R. Abbott,
Secretary to the Commission.
[FR Doc. 05–19593 Filed 9–30–05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7020–02–P
VerDate Aug<31>2005
17:26 Sep 30, 2005
Jkt 205001
INTERNATIONAL TRADE
COMMISSION
[Inv. No. 337–TA–506]
Certain Optical Disk Controller Chips
and Chipsets and Products Containing
Same, Including DVD Players and PC
Optical Storage Devices; Notice of
Final Determination; Issuance of
Limited Exclusion Order and Cease
and Desist Orders; Termination of
Investigation
U.S. International Trade
Commission.
ACTION: Notice.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that
the U.S. International Trade
Commission has found a violation of
section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930 (19
U.S.C. 337) based on the infringement of
one asserted claim of one asserted
patent and has issued a limited
exclusion order and cease and desist
orders in the above-captioned
investigation.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Clara Kuehn, Esq., Office of the General
Counsel, U.S. International Trade
Commission, 500 E Street, SW.,
Washington, DC 20436, telephone (202)
205–3012. Copies of the Commission
orders, the Commission opinion in
support thereof, and all other
nonconfidential documents filed in
connection with this investigation are or
will be available for inspection during
official business hours (8:45 a.m. to 5:15
p.m.) in the Office of the Secretary, U.S.
International Trade Commission, 500 E
Street, SW., Washington, DC 20436,
telephone 202–205–2000.
General information concerning the
Commission may also be obtained by
accessing its Internet server (https://
www.usitc.gov). The public record for
this investigation may be viewed on the
Commission’s electronic docket (EDISON-LINE) at https://edis.usitc.gov.
Hearing-impaired persons are advised
that information on this matter can be
obtained by contacting the
Commission’s TDD terminal on 202–
205–1810.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The
Commission instituted this investigation
on April 14, 2004, based on a complaint
filed on behalf of Zoran Corporation and
Oak Technology, Inc. both of
Sunnyvale, CA (collectively
‘‘complainants’’). 69 FR 19876. The
complaint, as supplemented, alleged
violations of section 337 of the Tariff
Act of 1930 in the importation into the
United States, the sale for importation,
and the sale within the United States
after importation of certain optical disk
PO 00000
Frm 00070
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
controller chips and chipsets and
products containing same, including
DVD players and PC optical storage
devices, by reason of infringement of
claims 1–12 of U.S. Patent No. 6,466,736
(the ’736 patent), claims 1–3 of U.S.
Patent No. 6,584,527 (the ’527 patent),
and claims 1–35 of U.S. Patent No.
6,546,440 (the ’440 patent). Id.
The notice of investigation identified
12 respondents. 69 FR 19876. On June
7, 2004, the ALJ issued an ID (Order No.
5) terminating the investigation as to
two respondents on the basis of a
consent order and settlement agreement.
On June 22, 2004, the ALJ issued an ID
(Order No. 7) granting complainants’
motion to amend the complaint and
notice of investigation to add nine
additional respondents. Those IDs were
not reviewed by the Commission.
On December 22, 2004, the ALJ issued
an ID (Order No. 33) granting
complainants’ motion to terminate the
investigation in part with respect to
claims 2–6, 8–10, and 11 of the ’736
patent and claims 2–4, 6, 9, 11, 12, 15–
18, 20, 22–34, and 35 of the ’440 patent.
On January 28, 2005, the ALJ issued an
ID (Order No. 37) granting
complainants’ motion to terminate the
investigation in part with respect to
claim 12 of the ’736 patent. Neither ID
was reviewed by the Commission. Thus,
at the time that Order No. 37 issued, the
claims remaining for determination on
the merits were claims 1 and 7 of the
’736 patent; claims 1, 5, 7, 8, 10, 13, 14,
19, and 21 of the ’440 patent; and claims
1, 2, and 3 of the ’527 patent.
An eight-day evidentiary hearing was
held on February 7–12, and 14–15,
2005.
On May 16, 2005, the ALJ issued his
final ID, findings of fact and conclusions
of law, and recommended
determination on remedy and bonding.
The ALJ concluded that there was a
violation of section 337 based on his
findings that (a) the accused products
infringe claim 3 of the ’527 patent, (b)
the ’527 patent is not unenforceable, (c)
claim 3 of the ’527 patent is not invalid,
and (d) complainants have satisfied the
domestic industry requirement with
respect to the ’527 patent. Although the
ALJ found that the other asserted claims
of the ’527 patent (claims 1 and 2) are
not invalid, he found that the accused
products do not infringe those claims.
The ALJ found no violation with respect
to the other patents in issue. He found
that the accused products do not
infringe any asserted claim of the ’440
or ’736 patents and that complainants
have not satisfied the domestic industry
requirement with respect to those
patents. He also found that the asserted
claims of the ’440 and ’736 patents are
E:\FR\FM\03OCN1.SGM
03OCN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 190 (Monday, October 3, 2005)]
[Notices]
[Pages 57617-57620]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-19593]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION
[Investigation Nos. 731-TA-451 and 461 (Second Review)]
Gray Portland Cement and Cement Clinker From Japan and Mexico
AGENCY: United States International Trade Commission.
ACTION: Institution of five-year reviews concerning the antidumping
duty orders on gray portland cement and cement clinker from Japan and
Mexico.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Commission hereby gives notice that it has instituted
reviews pursuant to section 751(c) of the Tariff Act of 1930 (19 U.S.C.
1675(c)) (the Act) to determine whether revocation of the antidumping
duty orders on gray portland cement and cement clinker from Japan and
Mexico would be likely to lead to continuation or recurrence of
material injury. Pursuant to section 751(c)(2) of the Act, interested
parties are requested to respond to this notice by submitting the
information specified below to the Commission; \1\ to be assured of
consideration, the deadline for responses is November 22, 2005.
Comments on the adequacy of responses may be filed with the Commission
by December 16, 2005. For further information concerning the conduct of
these reviews and rules of general application, consult the
Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure, part 201, subparts A
through E (19 CFR part 201), and part 207, subparts A, D, E, and F (19
CFR part 207).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ No response to this request for information is required if a
currently valid Office of Management and Budget (OMB) number is not
displayed; the OMB number is 3117-0016/USITC No. 06-5-140,
expiration date June 30, 2008. Public reporting burden for the
request is estimated to average 10 hours per response. Please send
comments regarding the accuracy of this burden estimate to the
Office of Investigations, U.S. International Trade Commission, 500 E
Street, SW., Washington, DC 20436.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Dates: Effective October 3, 2005.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mary Messer (202-205-3193), Office of
Investigations, U.S. International Trade Commission, 500 E Street SW.,
Washington, DC 20436. Hearing-impaired persons can obtain information
on this matter by contacting the Commission's TDD terminal on 202-205-
1810. Persons with mobility impairments who will need special
assistance in gaining access to the Commission should contact the
Office of the Secretary at 202-205-2000. General information concerning
the Commission may also be obtained by accessing its Internet server
(https://www.usitc.gov). The public record for these reviews may be
viewed on the Commission's electronic docket (EDIS) at https://
edis.usitc.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background. On the dates listed below, the Department of Commerce
issued antidumping duty orders on the subject imports:
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Order date Product/country Inv. No. FR cite
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
8/30/90.......................... Gray portland cement & 731-TA-451.............. 55 FR 35443.
clinker/Mexico.
5/10/91.......................... Gray portland cement & 731-TA-461.............. 56 FR 21658.
clinker/Japan.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
[[Page 57618]]
Following five-year reviews by Commerce and the Commission,
effective November 15, 2000, Commerce issued a continuation of the
antidumping duty orders on imports of gray portland cement and cement
clinker from Japan and Mexico (65 FR 68979). The Commission is now
conducting second reviews to determine whether revocation of the order
would be likely to lead to continuation or recurrence of material
injury to the domestic industry within a reasonably foreseeable time.
It will assess the adequacy of interested party responses to this
notice of institution to determine whether to conduct full reviews or
expedited reviews. The Commission's determinations in any expedited
reviews will be based on the facts available, which may include
information provided in response to this notice.
Definitions. The following definitions apply to these reviews:
(1) Subject Merchandise is the class or kind of merchandise that is
within the scope of the five-year reviews, as defined by the Department
of Commerce.
(2) The Subject Countries in these reviews Japan and Mexico.
(3) The Domestic Like Product is the domestically produced product
or products which are like, or in the absence of like, most similar in
characteristics and uses with, the Subject Merchandise. In its original
and full five-year determinations, the Commission defined a single
Domestic Like Product consisting of gray portland cement and cement
clinker.
(4) The Domestic Industry is the U.S. producers as a whole of the
Domestic Like Product, or those producers whose collective output of
the Domestic Like Product constitutes a major proportion of the total
domestic production of the product. In its original determinations, the
Commission defined the Domestic Industry as producers of gray portland
cement and cement clinker, including ``grinding only'' operations. In
both original determinations, the Commission concluded that
``appropriate circumstances'' existed for a regional analysis of the
industry; however, the Commission found different regions to be
appropriate based on the facts of each investigation. In its full five-
year review determinations, the Commission took into account the
Commission's prior regional industry definitions in its analysis and
found separate regional industries, which corresponded, or were
similar, to those defined in the original investigations.
In its original determination concerning Mexico, two Commissioners
found that either the Southern Tier Region (the States of Florida,
Alabama, Mississippi, Louisiana, Texas, New Mexico, Arizona, and
California) or the alternative Southern Tier Region (excluding northern
California and the inland counties of the Gulf States) was appropriate
and that no compelling case was made for one rather than the other. For
purposes of the original determination, they used the Southern Tier
Region because it was the more difficult region within which to reach
an affirmative finding. One Commissioner found that the alternative
Southern Tier Region was appropriate. In its five-year review
determination concerning Mexico, the Commission found the regional
industry to consist of producers in the Southern Tier Region. In its
original determination concerning Japan, the Commission found the
regional industry to consist of producers in Southern California;
certain Commissioners found the regional industry to consist of
producers in the State of California. In its five-year review
determination concerning Japan, the Commission found the regional
industry to consist of producers in the State of California. For
purposes of this notice, you should report information separately on
each of the following Domestic Industries: (1) Producers of gray
portland cement and cement clinker, including ``grinding only''
operations, located in the Southern Tier Region; (2) producers of gray
portland cement and cement clinker, including ``grinding only''
operations, located in Southern California; (3) producers of gray
portland cement and cement clinker, including ``grinding only''
operations, located in the State of California; and (4) producers of
gray portland cement and cement clinker, including ``grinding only''
operations, located in the United States as a whole.
(5) An Importer is any person or firm engaged, either directly or
through a parent company or subsidiary, in importing the Subject
Merchandise into the United States from a foreign manufacturer or
through its selling agent.
Participation in the reviews and public service list. Persons,
including industrial users of the Subject Merchandise and, if the
merchandise is sold at the retail level, representative consumer
organizations, wishing to participate in the reviews as parties must
file an entry of appearance with the Secretary to the Commission, as
provided in section 201.11(b)(4) of the Commission's rules, no later
than 21 days after publication of this notice in the Federal Register.
The Secretary will maintain a public service list containing the names
and addresses of all persons, or their representatives, who are parties
to the reviews.
Former Commission employees who are seeking to appear in Commission
five-year reviews are reminded that they are required, pursuant to 19
CFR 201.15, to seek Commission approval if the matter in which they are
seeking to appear was pending in any manner or form during their
Commission employment. The Commission is seeking guidance as to whether
a second transition five-year review is the ``same particular matter''
as the underlying original investigation for purposes of 19 CFR 201.15
and 18 U.S.C. 207, the post employment statute for Federal employees.
Former employees may seek informal advice from Commission ethics
officials with respect to this and the related issue of whether the
employee's participation was ``personal and substantial.'' However, any
informal consultation will not relieve former employees of the
obligation to seek approval to appear from the Commission under its
rule 201.15. For ethics advice, contact Carol McCue Verratti, Deputy
Agency Ethics Official, at 202-205-3088.
Limited disclosure of business proprietary information (BPI) under
an administrative protective order (APO) and APO service list. Pursuant
to section 207.7(a) of the Commission's rules, the Secretary will make
BPI submitted in these reviews available to authorized applicants under
the APO issued in the reviews, provided that the application is made no
later than 21 days after publication of this notice in the Federal
Register. Authorized applicants must represent interested parties, as
defined in 19 U.S.C. 1677(9), who are parties to the reviews. A
separate service list will be maintained by the Secretary for those
parties authorized to receive BPI under the APO.
Certification. Pursuant to section 207.3 of the Commission's rules,
any person submitting information to the Commission in connection with
these reviews must certify that the information is accurate and
complete to the best of the submitter's knowledge. In making the
certification, the submitter will be deemed to consent, unless
otherwise specified, for the Commission, its employees, and contract
personnel to use the information provided in any other reviews or
investigations of the same or comparable products which the Commission
conducts under Title VII of the Act, or in internal audits and
investigations relating to the programs
[[Page 57619]]
and operations of the Commission pursuant to 5 U.S.C. Appendix 3.
Written submissions. Pursuant to section 207.61 of the Commission's
rules, each interested party response to this notice must provide the
information specified below. The deadline for filing such responses is
November 22, 2005. Pursuant to section 207.62(b) of the Commission's
rules, eligible parties (as specified in Commission rule 207.62(b)(1))
may also file comments concerning the adequacy of responses to the
notice of institution and whether the Commission should conduct
expedited or full reviews. The deadline for filing such comments is
December 16, 2005. All written submissions must conform with the
provisions of sections 201.8 and 207.3 of the Commission's rules and
any submissions that contain BPI must also conform with the
requirements of sections 201.6 and 207.7 of the Commission's rules. The
Commission's rules do not authorize filing of submissions with the
Secretary by facsimile or electronic means, except to the extent
permitted by section 201.8 of the Commission's rules, as amended, 67 FR
68036 (November 8, 2002). Also, in accordance with sections 201.16(c)
and 207.3 of the Commission's rules, each document filed by a party to
the reviews must be served on all other parties to the reviews (as
identified by either the public or APO service list as appropriate),
and a certificate of service must accompany the document (if you are
not a party to the reviews you do not need to serve your response).
Inability to provide requested information. Pursuant to section
207.61(c) of the Commission's rules, any interested party that cannot
furnish the information requested by this notice in the requested form
and manner shall notify the Commission at the earliest possible time,
provide a full explanation of why it cannot provide the requested
information, and indicate alternative forms in which it can provide
equivalent information. If an interested party does not provide this
notification (or the Commission finds the explanation provided in the
notification inadequate) and fails to provide a complete response to
this notice, the Commission may take an adverse inference against the
party pursuant to section 776(b) of the Act in making its
determinations in the reviews.
Information To Be Provided in Response To this Notice of
Institution: Please provide the requested information separately for
each Domestic Industry, as defined by the Commission in its original
and full five-year review determinations. If you are a domestic
producer, union/worker group, or trade/business association; import/
export Subject Merchandise from more than one Subject Country; or
produce Subject Merchandise in more than one Subject Country, you may
file a single response. If you do so, please ensure that your response
to each question includes the information requested for each pertinent
Subject Country. As used below, the term ``firm'' includes any related
firms.
(1) The name and address of your firm or entity (including World
Wide Web address if available) and name, telephone number, fax number,
and E-mail address of the certifying official.
(2) A statement indicating whether your firm/entity is a U.S.
producer of the Domestic Like Product, a U.S. union or worker group, a
U.S. importer of the Subject Merchandise, a foreign producer or
exporter of the Subject Merchandise, a U.S. or foreign trade or
business association, or another interested party (including an
explanation). If you are a union/worker group or trade/business
association, identify the firms in which your workers are employed or
which are members of your association.
(3) A statement indicating whether your firm/entity is willing to
participate in these reviews by providing information requested by the
Commission.
(4) A statement of the likely effects of the revocation of the
antidumping duty order on the Domestic Industries in general and/or
your firm/entity specifically. In your response, please discuss the
various factors specified in section 752(a) of the Act (19 U.S.C.
1675a(a)) including the likely volume of subject imports, likely price
effects of subject imports, and likely impact of imports of Subject
Merchandise on the Domestic Industries.
(5) A list of all known and currently operating U.S. producers of
the Domestic Like Product. Identify any known related parties and the
nature of the relationship as defined in section 771(4)(B) of the Act
(19 U.S.C. 1677(4)(B)).
(6) A list of all known and currently operating U.S. importers of
the Subject Merchandise and producers of the Subject Merchandise in the
Subject Country(ies) that currently export or have exported Subject
Merchandise to the United States or other countries after 1999.
(7) If you are a U.S. producer of the Domestic Like Product,
provide the following information on your firm's operations on that
product during calendar year 2004 (report quantity data in short tons
and value data in U.S. dollars, f.o.b. plant). If you are a union/
worker group or trade/business association, provide the information, on
an aggregate basis, for the firms in which your workers are employed/
which are members of your association.
(a) Production (quantity) and, if known, an estimate of the
percentage of total U.S. production of the Domestic Like Product
accounted for by your firm's(s') production;
(b) The quantity and value of U.S. commercial shipments of the
Domestic Like Product produced in your U.S. plant(s); and
(c) The quantity and value of U.S. internal consumption/company
transfers of the Domestic Like Product produced in your U.S. plant(s).
(8) If you are a U.S. importer or a trade/business association of
U.S. importers of the Subject Merchandise from the Subject
Country(ies), provide the following information on your firm's(s')
operations on that product during calendar year 2004 (report quantity
data in short tons and value data in U.S. dollars). If you are a trade/
business association, provide the information, on an aggregate basis,
for the firms which are members of your association.
(a) The quantity and value (landed, duty-paid but not including
antidumping) of U.S. imports and, if known, an estimate of the
percentage of total U.S. imports of Subject Merchandise from the
Subject Country(ies) accounted for by your firm's(s') imports;
(b) The quantity and value (f.o.b. U.S. port, including antidumping
duties) of U.S. commercial shipments of Subject Merchandise imported
from each Subject Country; and
(c) The quantity and value (f.o.b. U.S. port, including antidumping
duties) of U.S. internal consumption/company transfers of Subject
Merchandise imported from each Subject Country.
(9) If you are a producer, an exporter, or a trade/business
association of producers or exporters of the Subject Merchandise in the
Subject Country(ies), provide the following information on your
firm's(s') operations on that product during calendar year 2004 (report
quantity data in short tons and value data in U.S. dollars, landed and
duty-paid at the U.S. port but not including antidumping duties). If
you are a trade/business association, provide the information, on an
aggregate basis, for the firms which are members of your association.
(a) Production (quantity) and, if known, an estimate of the
percentage of total production of Subject Merchandise in the Subject
Country(ies) accounted for by your firm's(s') production; and
[[Page 57620]]
(b) The quantity and value of your firm's(s') exports to the United
States of Subject Merchandise and, if known, an estimate of the
percentage of total exports to the United States of Subject Merchandise
from the Subject Country(ies) accounted for by your firm's(s') exports.
(10) Identify significant changes, if any, in the supply and demand
conditions or business cycle for the Domestic Like Product that have
occurred in the United States or in the market for the Subject
Merchandise in the Subject Country(ies) after 1999, and significant
changes, if any, that are likely to occur within a reasonably
foreseeable time. Supply conditions to consider include technology;
production methods; development efforts; ability to increase production
(including the shift of production facilities used for other products
and the use, cost, or availability of major inputs into production);
and factors related to the ability to shift supply among different
national markets (including barriers to importation in foreign markets
or changes in market demand abroad). Demand conditions to consider
include end uses and applications; the existence and availability of
substitute products; and the level of competition among the Domestic
Like Product produced in the United States, Subject Merchandise
produced in the Subject Country(ies), and such merchandise from other
countries.
(11) (Optional) A statement of whether you agree with the above
definitions of the Domestic Like Product and Domestic Industries; if
you disagree with either or both of these definitions, please explain
why and provide alternative definitions.
Authority: These reviews are being conducted under authority of
title VII of the Tariff Act of 1930; this notice is published
pursuant to section 207.61 of the Commission's rules.
Issued: September 27, 2005.
By order of the Commission.
Marilyn R. Abbott,
Secretary to the Commission.
[FR Doc. 05-19593 Filed 9-30-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7020-02-P