Self-Regulatory Organizations; National Association of Securities Dealers, Inc.; Order Granting Approval to Proposed Rule Change and Amendment No. 1 Thereto, and Notice of Filing and Order Granting Accelerated Approval to Amendment Nos. 2, 3, and 4 Thereto, Relating to NASD's Direct Authority for the Activities Related to or in Support of Trading in Over-the-Counter Equity Securities, 57346-57348 [E5-5334]
Download as PDF
57346
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 189 / Friday, September 30, 2005 / Notices
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
COMMISSION
[Release No. 34–52508; File No. SR–NASD–
2005–089]
Self-Regulatory Organizations;
National Association of Securities
Dealers, Inc.; Order Granting Approval
to Proposed Rule Change and
Amendment No. 1 Thereto, and Notice
of Filing and Order Granting
Accelerated Approval to Amendment
Nos. 2, 3, and 4 Thereto, Relating to
NASD’s Direct Authority for the
Activities Related to or in Support of
Trading in Over-the-Counter Equity
Securities
September 26, 2005.
I. Introduction
On July 19, 2005, the National
Association of Securities Dealers, Inc.
(‘‘NASD’’) filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission (‘‘Commission’’),
pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(‘‘Act’’) 1 and Rule 19b–4 thereunder,2 a
proposed rule change to amend NASD’s
Plan of Allocation and Delegation of
Functions by the NASD to Subsidiaries
(‘‘Delegation Plan’’) and certain NASD
rules to reflect the NASD’s direct
authority for the activities related to or
in support of trading in over-the-counter
(‘‘OTC’’) equity securities,3 including,
but not limited to, the OTC Bulletin
Board (‘‘OTCBB’’). Currently, this
authority is delegated to The Nasdaq
Stock Market, Inc. (‘‘Nasdaq’’). On July
22, 2005, the NASD filed Amendment
No. 1 to the proposed rule change.4 The
proposed rule change, as amended, was
published for comment in the Federal
Register on July 29, 2005.5
The Commission received two
comment letters in response to the
proposal.6 On September 13, 2005, the
1 15
U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
CFR 240.19b–4.
3 The term ‘‘OTC equity securities’’ herein refers
to OTC Equity Securities as defined in NASD Rule
6610, including, but not limited to, OTC Bulletin
Board securities.
4 Amendment No. 1, which replaced and
superceded the original filing in its entirety, revised
NASD Rule 11890 to transfer the authority to
nullify or modify transactions in OTC equity
securities under certain circumstances to the NASD;
made conforming changes to Interpretive Material
(‘‘IM’’) 11890–1 and 11890–2; revised NASD Rule
6620 in light of the changes to NASD Rule 11890
contained in Amendment No. 1; and made several
minor and technical changes to the filing.
5 See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 52119
(July 25, 2005), 70 FR 43918 (‘‘Notice’’).
6 See Letter from R. Cromwell Coulson, Chief
Executive Officer, Pink Sheets LLC, to Jonathan G.
Katz, Secretary, Commission, dated August 31, 2005
(‘‘Pink Sheets Letter’’), and Letter from William A.
Vance, President and Kimberly Unger, Executive
Director, The Security Traders Association of New
2 17
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:14 Sep 29, 2005
Jkt 205001
NASD filed Amendment No. 2 to the
proposed rule change.7 On September
23, 2005, the NASD filed Amendment
Nos. 3 and 4 to the proposed rule
change.8 The amended rule text set forth
in Amendment No. 2 and the text of
Amendment Nos. 3 and 4 are available
on the NASD’s Web site (https://
www.nasd.com), at the NASD’s Office of
the Secretary, and at the Commission’s
Public Reference Room.
This order approves the proposed rule
change, as amended. In addition, the
Commission provides notice of filing of
Amendment Nos. 2, 3, and 4, grants
accelerated approval to Amendment
Nos. 2, 3, and 4, and solicits comments
from interested persons on Amendment
Nos. 2, 3, and 4.
II. Description of the Proposal
Pursuant to the Delegation Plan,
activities related to or in support of the
trading in OTC equity securities,
including, but not limited to, operation
of the OTCBB 9 (collectively, ‘‘OTC
equity operations’’), have been
delegated from the NASD to Nasdaq. In
this context, OTC equity operations
include services such as trade reporting,
comparison, quote collection and
dissemination, as applicable, and the
related rulemaking functions in this
area.
Under the proposal to amend the
Delegation Plan, the NASD would
York, Inc., to Jonathan G. Katz, Secretary,
Commission, dated September 19, 2005 (‘‘STANY
Letter’’).
7 In Amendment No. 2, the NASD revised the text
of NASD Rule 11890 and IM–11890–2 to reflect
amendments to those provisions that were
approved by the Commission shortly before
publication of the Notice. See Securities Exchange
Act Release No. 52141 (July 27, 2005), 70 FR 44709
(August 3, 2005) (SR–NASD–2004–009). These
recent revisions to NASD Rule 11890 and IM–
11890–2 do not affect the substance of the instant
proposed rule change. In addition, Amendment No.
2 changed the effective date of the proposed rule
change from September 1, 2005 to October 1, 2005,
and proposed amendments to NASD Rule
11890(b)(1) and (2) to clarify the time frame for
action by Nasdaq or NASD officials under those
paragraphs of NASD’s clearly erroneous rule.
8 In Amendment No. 3, the NASD made a nonsubstantive change to Exhibit 4 that was included
in Amendment No. 2 to reflect changes to the text
of NASD Rule 11890 submitted in Amendment No.
2. The NASD subsequently filed Amendment No. 4
to make a non-substantive edit to the formatting of
the text of IM–11890–2.
9 The OTCBB provides an electronic quotation
medium for subscribing members to enter, update,
and display quotations in individual securities on
a real-time basis. Such quotation entries may
consist of a priced bid and/or offer, an unpriced
indication of interest, or a bid/offer accompanied by
a modifier to reflect unsolicited customer interest.
The OTCBB is not an issuer listing service and
therefore does not maintain a relationship with
quoted issuers or impose quantitative listing
standards as do Nasdaq and the exchanges. To be
eligible for quotation on the OTCBB, issuers must
be current in their filings with the Commission or
applicable regulatory authority.
PO 00000
Frm 00099
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
assume direct authority for OTC equity
operations rather than delegate this
authority to Nasdaq. In addition, the
NASD would delegate to NASD
Regulation, Inc. (‘‘NASDR’’) the
rulemaking authority relating to trading
practices for OTC equity securities. The
NASD intends, however, to contract
with Nasdaq to have it continue to
provide certain operational systems and
support, OTCBB quotation and trade
reporting platform and certain other
services that Nasdaq currently provides
with respect to OTC equity operations.
The NASD also proposes to: (1)
Amend NASD Rule 6545 to transfer
trading and quotation halt authority for
OTCBB-eligible securities from Nasdaq
to the NASD; (2) amend NASD Rule
11890 to transfer from Nasdaq to the
NASD the ability to nullify or modify a
transaction in an OTC equity security in
certain circumstances; (3) amend NASD
Rule 11890 to incorporate revisions to
that rule that were approved by the
Commission shortly before publication
of the Notice and to clarify the time
frame for action by NASD or Nasdaq
officials to nullify or adjust the terms of
a trade under paragraph (b) of NASD
Rule 11890; 10 (4) amend NASD Rule
6620(f) to conform the portion of the
rule governing reporting of cancelled
trades to reflect the proposed changes to
NASD Rule 11890; and (5) amend NASD
Rule 7010(p)(3) to transfer the authority
to set certain fees for historical research
reports for OTCBB-eligible securities
from Nasdaq to the NASD.
The NASD intends that the proposed
rule change, as amended, will become
effective on October 1, 2005, pending
Commission approval prior to that date.
III. Summary of Comments and the
NASD’s Response
The Commission received two
comment letters relating to the NASD’s
proposed rule change as modified by
Amendment No. 1.11 The Pink Sheets
Letter and STANY Letter supported the
NASD’s proposed rule change.
The Pink Sheets Letter further
suggested that the Nasdaq Quotation
Dissemination Service (‘‘Service’’)
disseminate real-time trade and volume
data for non-Nasdaq American
Depositary Receipts (‘‘ADRs’’) that are
traded in the over-the-counter market,
which currently are disseminated at the
end of the trading day. In addition, the
Pink Sheets Letter stated that the
Service should disseminate real-time
trade and volume data for odd-lot
transactions in all OTC equity securities
10 See
Amendment No. 2, supra note 7.
Pink Sheets Letter and STANY Letter,
supra note 6.
11 See
E:\FR\FM\30SEN1.SGM
30SEN1
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 189 / Friday, September 30, 2005 / Notices
that are sold for a price greater than
$200 per share. The Pink Sheets Letter
noted that the Service currently
disseminates such information for
securities that are quoted on the
OTCBB, but not for other OTC equity
securities.
The STANY Letter shared the views
presented in the Pink Sheets Letter
relating to the dissemination of trade
and volume data for OTC equity
securities. Specifically, the STANY
Letter stated that it believed that no
valid reason existed for Nasdaq to
distinguish between the data it
disseminates for domestic OTC equity
securities and ADRs traded in the overthe-counter market, and that Nasdaq
should disseminate real-time trade and
volume data for odd-lot transactions in
OTC equity securities, including Pink
Sheets securities, that are sold for a
price greater than $200 per share.
The Pink Sheets Letter also
recommended that the NASD prepare a
Notice to Members to remind brokerdealers about their obligation not to
participate in unlawful securities
distributions. Further, the Pink Sheets
Letter recommended that NASDR
review this issue with a view to
proposing rules that would preclude the
participation of broker-dealers in
unlawful distributions of securities by
their customers. In addition, the Pink
Sheets Letter advocated extending trade
halt authority under NASD Rule 6545 to
all OTC equity securities, rather than
limiting it to OTCBB-eligible securities,
and to extend the authority to situations
where fraudulent or manipulative acts
are strongly suspected, rather than
relying on actions by other markets.
Further, the Pink Sheets Letter
suggested limiting such trade halt
authority to four days so that
‘‘piggyback’’ eligibility under Rule
15c2–11 under the Act 12 is not affected.
Finally, the Pink Sheets Letter
recommended that the NASD’s
authority to cancel clearly erroneous
trades pursuant to NASD Rule 11890
should extend until the settlement date
for the transactions in question.
In Amendment No. 2, the NASD
noted that because the
recommendations in the Pink Sheets
Letter are outside the scope of the
proposed rule change, it is not
specifically responding to those
recommendations in the context of the
proposed rule change. The NASD,
however, indicated that it will review
and analyze the recommendations set
forth in the Pink Sheets Letter in the
same manner in which it would
consider any requests for rulemaking,
12 17
CFR 240.15c2–11.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:14 Sep 29, 2005
Jkt 205001
and, based on such review and analysis,
will determine whether further action
on those recommendations is
appropriate.13
IV. Discussion and Commission
Findings
The Commission finds that the
proposed rule change, as amended, is
consistent with the provisions of
Section 15A(b)(6) of the Act,14 which
requires, among other things, that NASD
rules must be designed to prevent
fraudulent and manipulative acts and
practices, to promote just and equitable
principles of trade, and, in general, to
protect investors and the public
interest.15
Under the proposal, the NASD will
assume direct authority for OTC equity
operations that it previously had
delegated to Nasdaq. The NASD
represents that, pursuant to a
contractual arrangement with Nasdaq,
Nasdaq will continue to provide certain
operational systems and support,
including the OTCBB quotation and
trade reporting platform and certain
other services that Nasdaq currently
provides with respect to OTC equity
operations. In addition, the NASD
proposes to delegate to NASDR the
authority to develop and adopt rule
changes to establish trading practices
with respect to OTC equity securities.
The Commission believes that the
proposal by the NASD to assume direct
responsibility for OTC equity
operations, including operation of the
OTCBB, and to delegate to NASDR the
authority to develop and adopt rule
changes to establish trading practices
with respect to OTC equity securities is
consistent with the Act. In the
Commission’s view, since the NASD is
the self-regulatory organization with
authority over and responsibility for the
oversight of the OTC equity market, it is
reasonable for the NASD to revise its
Delegation Plan to assume direct
authority for OTC equity operations and
to delegate to NASDR rulemaking
authority for trading practices involving
OTC equity securities.
In addition, the proposal would
amend NASD Rule 11890 to grant the
NASD direct authority to determine, on
13 The Commission notes that the NASD did not
respond to the STANY Letter because it was
submitted after the NASD had filed Amendment
No. 2. As noted above, the STANY Letter adopted
the views of the Pink Sheets Letter with respect to
the dissemination of trade and volume data for OTC
equity securities.
14 15 U.S.C. 78o–3(b)(6).
15 In approving this proposed rule change, as
amended, the Commission notes that it has
considered the proposed rule’s impact on
efficiency, competition, and capital formation. See
15 U.S.C. 78c(f).
PO 00000
Frm 00100
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
57347
its own motion, whether certain
transactions in OTC equity securities
should be modified or nullified in the
event of a disruption or malfunction of
any NASD quotation, communication,
or trade reporting system or in the event
of extraordinary market conditions in
which nullification or modification of
transactions may be necessary for the
maintenance of a fair and orderly
market or the protection of investors
and the public interest. The proposal
also provides a process by which a
determination under NASD Rule 11890
could be appealed to the Uniform
Practice Code (‘‘UPC’’) Committee,
unless the Executive Vice President who
makes the initial determination
specifies at that time that the number of
affected transactions is such that
immediate finality is necessary to
maintain a fair and orderly market and
to protect investors and the public
interest. The Commission believes that
the assumption of direct authority by
the NASD to nullify or modify the terms
of trades in OTC equity securities under
certain conditions is appropriate and
should help clarify for OTC equity
market participants the NASD’s
authority to nullify or modify the terms
of clearly erroneous transactions in OTC
equity securities.
The proposal would amend certain
other rules, including NASD Rule
6620(f) and NASD Rule 7010(p)(3), to
reflect the transfer of authority from
Nasdaq to the NASD with respect to the
reporting of trades cancelled pursuant to
NASD Rule 11890 and the authority to
set fees for historical research reports for
OTCBB-eligible securities, respectively.
The Commission believes that these
changes are appropriate to conform the
applicable rule text to reflect the
assumption of direct responsibility for
OTC equity securities by the NASD.
The Commission finds good cause for
approving Amendment Nos. 2, 3, and 4
to the proposed rule change prior to the
thirtieth day after the date of the
publication of notice thereof in the
Federal Register. The Commission notes
that Amendment No. 2 is a nonsubstantive amendment to revise the
effective date of the proposed rule
change; to reflect changes to NASD Rule
11890 and IM–11890–2 that were
approved by the Commission shortly
before publication of the Notice; and to
clarify the timeframe for NASD or
Nasdaq officials to act on their own
motion to nullify or modify the terms of
a trade under NASD Rule 11890.
Further, Amendment No. 3 is a nonsubstantive amendment to revise
Exhibit 4 contained in Amendment No.
2 to reflect the changes to the text of
NASD Rule 11890 submitted in
E:\FR\FM\30SEN1.SGM
30SEN1
57348
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 189 / Friday, September 30, 2005 / Notices
Amendment No. 2, and Amendment No.
4 is a non-substantive amendment to
IM–11890–2. The Commission therefore
believes that it is appropriate to
accelerate approval of Amendment Nos.
2, 3, and 4 so that the proposed rule
change, as amended, may be
implemented in full without delay.
V. Solicitation of Comments
Interested persons are invited to
submit written data, views, and
arguments concerning the foregoing,
including whether Amendment Nos. 2,
3, and 4 to the proposed rule change, as
amended, are consistent with the Act.
Comments may be submitted by any of
the following methods:
should be submitted on or before
October 21, 2005.
VI. Conclusion
It is therefore ordered, pursuant to
Section 19(b)(2) of the Act,16 that the
proposed rule change (SR–NASD–2005–
089), as amended, be, and it hereby is,
approved, and Amendment Nos. 2, 3,
and 4 are hereby approved on an
accelerated basis.
For the Commission, by the Division of
Market Regulation, pursuant to delegated
authority.17
Jonathan G. Katz,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. E5–5334 Filed 9–29–05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8010–01–P
Electronic Comments
• Use the Commission’s Internet
comment form (https://www.sec.gov/
rules/sro.shtml); or
• Send an e-mail to rulecomments@sec.gov. Please include File
Number SR–NASD–2005–089 on the
subject line.
Paper Comments
• Send paper comments in triplicate
to Jonathan G. Katz, Secretary,
Securities and Exchange Commission,
Station Place, 100 F Street, NE.,
Washington, DC 20549–9303.
All submissions should refer to File
Number SR–NASD–2005–089. This file
number should be included on the
subject line if e-mail is used. To help the
Commission process and review your
comments more efficiently, please use
only one method. The Commission will
post all comments on the Commission’s
Internet Web site (https://www.sec.gov/
rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the
submission, all subsequent
amendments, all written statements
with respect to the proposed rule
change that are filed with the
Commission, and all written
communications relating to the
proposed rule change between the
Commission and any person, other than
those that may be withheld from the
public in accordance with the
provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be
available for inspection and copying in
the Commission’s Public Reference
Room. Copies of such filing also will be
available for inspection and copying at
the principal office of the Nasdaq. All
comments received will be posted
without change; the Commission does
not edit personal identifying
information from submissions. You
should submit only information that
you wish to make available publicly. All
submissions should refer to File
Number SR–NASD–2005–089 and
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:14 Sep 29, 2005
Jkt 205001
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
COMMISSION
[Release No. 34–52502; File No. SR–PCX–
2005–19]
Self-Regulatory Organizations; Pacific
Exchange, Inc.; Order Approving
Proposed Rule Change and
Amendment No. 1 Thereto Relating to
Proposed New Listing Fees
September 23, 2005.
I. Introduction
On February 28, 2005, the Pacific
Exchange, Inc. (‘‘PCX’’ or ‘‘Exchange’’),
through its wholly-owned subsidiary
PCX Equities, Inc., filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission
(‘‘Commission’’) a proposed rule change
pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(‘‘Act’’) 1 and Rule 19b–4 thereunder,2 to
increase certain portions of its listing
fees and to make a number of related
modifications. On June 15, 2005, PCX
amended the proposed rule change. The
proposed rule change, as modified by
Amendment No. 1, was published for
comment in the Federal Register on
August 16, 2005.3 The Commission
received no comments on the proposal.
This order approves the proposed rule
change.
II. Description of the Proposal
PCX is proposing to amend its
Schedule of Fees and Charges, as
follows: (1) Implement new initial
listing fees specifically for common
stock issued in initial public offerings
and listed exclusively by PCX for
trading on the Archipelago Exchange
(‘‘ArcaEx’’), a facility of PCX, and make
related modifications to the initial
listing fees; (2) exempt from initial
listing fees already-public issues which
are listed and/or quoted on other
marketplaces, whether or not dually
listed; (3) exempt from annual
maintenance fees transfer listings for the
first 12 calendar months after listing,
whether or not dually listed; (4) revise
the annual maintenance fees; and (5)
revise the additional shares listing fees.
III. Discussion
After careful consideration, the
Commission finds that the proposed
rule change, as amended, is consistent
with the requirements of Section 6(b) of
the Act 4 and the rules and regulations
thereunder applicable to a national
securities exchange.5 In particular, the
Commission finds that the proposed
rule change is consistent with Section
6(b)(4) of the Act,6 which requires,
among other things, that an exchange’s
rules provide for the equitable
allocation of reasonable dues, fees, and
other charges among issuers and other
persons using its facilities. The
Commission notes that the Exchange
does not believe that the proposed
listing fee changes, including the
proposed exemptions from certain
listing fees, would negatively impact the
Exchange’s regulatory program. Further,
the Commission notes that PCX has
committed extensive resources to its
listings program since the ArcaEx began
operating as a facility of PCX. Finally,
the Commission believes that the
proposal might also serve to enhance
competition among listing markets.
IV. Conclusion
It is therefore ordered, pursuant to
Section 19(b)(2) of the Act,7 that the
proposed rule change (SR–PCX–2005–
19), as amended, be, and it hereby is,
approved.
For the Commission, by the Division of
Market Regulation, pursuant to delegated
authority.8
Jonathan G. Katz,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. E5–5327 Filed 9–29–05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8010–01–P
4 15
U.S.C. 78f(b).
approving the proposed rule change, the
Commission has considered its impact on
efficiency, competition, and capital formation. 15
U.S.C. 78c(f).
6 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(4).
7 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(2).
8 17 CFR 200.30–3(a)(12).
5 In
16 15
U.S.C. 78s(b)(2).
CFR 200.30–3(a)(12).
1 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
2 17 CFR 240.19b–4.
3 See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 52225
(August 8, 2005), 70 FR 48224.
17 17
PO 00000
Frm 00101
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
E:\FR\FM\30SEN1.SGM
30SEN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 189 (Friday, September 30, 2005)]
[Notices]
[Pages 57346-57348]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E5-5334]
[[Page 57346]]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
[Release No. 34-52508; File No. SR-NASD-2005-089]
Self-Regulatory Organizations; National Association of Securities
Dealers, Inc.; Order Granting Approval to Proposed Rule Change and
Amendment No. 1 Thereto, and Notice of Filing and Order Granting
Accelerated Approval to Amendment Nos. 2, 3, and 4 Thereto, Relating to
NASD's Direct Authority for the Activities Related to or in Support of
Trading in Over-the-Counter Equity Securities
September 26, 2005.
I. Introduction
On July 19, 2005, the National Association of Securities Dealers,
Inc. (``NASD'') filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
(``Commission''), pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 (``Act'') \1\ and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,\2\ a
proposed rule change to amend NASD's Plan of Allocation and Delegation
of Functions by the NASD to Subsidiaries (``Delegation Plan'') and
certain NASD rules to reflect the NASD's direct authority for the
activities related to or in support of trading in over-the-counter
(``OTC'') equity securities,\3\ including, but not limited to, the OTC
Bulletin Board (``OTCBB''). Currently, this authority is delegated to
The Nasdaq Stock Market, Inc. (``Nasdaq''). On July 22, 2005, the NASD
filed Amendment No. 1 to the proposed rule change.\4\ The proposed rule
change, as amended, was published for comment in the Federal Register
on July 29, 2005.\5\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
\2\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
\3\ The term ``OTC equity securities'' herein refers to OTC
Equity Securities as defined in NASD Rule 6610, including, but not
limited to, OTC Bulletin Board securities.
\4\ Amendment No. 1, which replaced and superceded the original
filing in its entirety, revised NASD Rule 11890 to transfer the
authority to nullify or modify transactions in OTC equity securities
under certain circumstances to the NASD; made conforming changes to
Interpretive Material (``IM'') 11890-1 and 11890-2; revised NASD
Rule 6620 in light of the changes to NASD Rule 11890 contained in
Amendment No. 1; and made several minor and technical changes to the
filing.
\5\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 52119 (July 25,
2005), 70 FR 43918 (``Notice'').
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Commission received two comment letters in response to the
proposal.\6\ On September 13, 2005, the NASD filed Amendment No. 2 to
the proposed rule change.\7\ On September 23, 2005, the NASD filed
Amendment Nos. 3 and 4 to the proposed rule change.\8\ The amended rule
text set forth in Amendment No. 2 and the text of Amendment Nos. 3 and
4 are available on the NASD's Web site (https://www.nasd.com), at the
NASD's Office of the Secretary, and at the Commission's Public
Reference Room.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\6\ See Letter from R. Cromwell Coulson, Chief Executive
Officer, Pink Sheets LLC, to Jonathan G. Katz, Secretary,
Commission, dated August 31, 2005 (``Pink Sheets Letter''), and
Letter from William A. Vance, President and Kimberly Unger,
Executive Director, The Security Traders Association of New York,
Inc., to Jonathan G. Katz, Secretary, Commission, dated September
19, 2005 (``STANY Letter'').
\7\ In Amendment No. 2, the NASD revised the text of NASD Rule
11890 and IM-11890-2 to reflect amendments to those provisions that
were approved by the Commission shortly before publication of the
Notice. See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 52141 (July 27,
2005), 70 FR 44709 (August 3, 2005) (SR-NASD-2004-009). These recent
revisions to NASD Rule 11890 and IM-11890-2 do not affect the
substance of the instant proposed rule change. In addition,
Amendment No. 2 changed the effective date of the proposed rule
change from September 1, 2005 to October 1, 2005, and proposed
amendments to NASD Rule 11890(b)(1) and (2) to clarify the time
frame for action by Nasdaq or NASD officials under those paragraphs
of NASD's clearly erroneous rule.
\8\ In Amendment No. 3, the NASD made a non-substantive change
to Exhibit 4 that was included in Amendment No. 2 to reflect changes
to the text of NASD Rule 11890 submitted in Amendment No. 2. The
NASD subsequently filed Amendment No. 4 to make a non-substantive
edit to the formatting of the text of IM-11890-2.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
This order approves the proposed rule change, as amended. In
addition, the Commission provides notice of filing of Amendment Nos. 2,
3, and 4, grants accelerated approval to Amendment Nos. 2, 3, and 4,
and solicits comments from interested persons on Amendment Nos. 2, 3,
and 4.
II. Description of the Proposal
Pursuant to the Delegation Plan, activities related to or in
support of the trading in OTC equity securities, including, but not
limited to, operation of the OTCBB \9\ (collectively, ``OTC equity
operations''), have been delegated from the NASD to Nasdaq. In this
context, OTC equity operations include services such as trade
reporting, comparison, quote collection and dissemination, as
applicable, and the related rulemaking functions in this area.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\9\ The OTCBB provides an electronic quotation medium for
subscribing members to enter, update, and display quotations in
individual securities on a real-time basis. Such quotation entries
may consist of a priced bid and/or offer, an unpriced indication of
interest, or a bid/offer accompanied by a modifier to reflect
unsolicited customer interest. The OTCBB is not an issuer listing
service and therefore does not maintain a relationship with quoted
issuers or impose quantitative listing standards as do Nasdaq and
the exchanges. To be eligible for quotation on the OTCBB, issuers
must be current in their filings with the Commission or applicable
regulatory authority.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Under the proposal to amend the Delegation Plan, the NASD would
assume direct authority for OTC equity operations rather than delegate
this authority to Nasdaq. In addition, the NASD would delegate to NASD
Regulation, Inc. (``NASDR'') the rulemaking authority relating to
trading practices for OTC equity securities. The NASD intends, however,
to contract with Nasdaq to have it continue to provide certain
operational systems and support, OTCBB quotation and trade reporting
platform and certain other services that Nasdaq currently provides with
respect to OTC equity operations.
The NASD also proposes to: (1) Amend NASD Rule 6545 to transfer
trading and quotation halt authority for OTCBB-eligible securities from
Nasdaq to the NASD; (2) amend NASD Rule 11890 to transfer from Nasdaq
to the NASD the ability to nullify or modify a transaction in an OTC
equity security in certain circumstances; (3) amend NASD Rule 11890 to
incorporate revisions to that rule that were approved by the Commission
shortly before publication of the Notice and to clarify the time frame
for action by NASD or Nasdaq officials to nullify or adjust the terms
of a trade under paragraph (b) of NASD Rule 11890; \10\ (4) amend NASD
Rule 6620(f) to conform the portion of the rule governing reporting of
cancelled trades to reflect the proposed changes to NASD Rule 11890;
and (5) amend NASD Rule 7010(p)(3) to transfer the authority to set
certain fees for historical research reports for OTCBB-eligible
securities from Nasdaq to the NASD.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\10\ See Amendment No. 2, supra note 7.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The NASD intends that the proposed rule change, as amended, will
become effective on October 1, 2005, pending Commission approval prior
to that date.
III. Summary of Comments and the NASD's Response
The Commission received two comment letters relating to the NASD's
proposed rule change as modified by Amendment No. 1.\11\ The Pink
Sheets Letter and STANY Letter supported the NASD's proposed rule
change.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\11\ See Pink Sheets Letter and STANY Letter, supra note 6.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Pink Sheets Letter further suggested that the Nasdaq Quotation
Dissemination Service (``Service'') disseminate real-time trade and
volume data for non-Nasdaq American Depositary Receipts (``ADRs'') that
are traded in the over-the-counter market, which currently are
disseminated at the end of the trading day. In addition, the Pink
Sheets Letter stated that the Service should disseminate real-time
trade and volume data for odd-lot transactions in all OTC equity
securities
[[Page 57347]]
that are sold for a price greater than $200 per share. The Pink Sheets
Letter noted that the Service currently disseminates such information
for securities that are quoted on the OTCBB, but not for other OTC
equity securities.
The STANY Letter shared the views presented in the Pink Sheets
Letter relating to the dissemination of trade and volume data for OTC
equity securities. Specifically, the STANY Letter stated that it
believed that no valid reason existed for Nasdaq to distinguish between
the data it disseminates for domestic OTC equity securities and ADRs
traded in the over-the-counter market, and that Nasdaq should
disseminate real-time trade and volume data for odd-lot transactions in
OTC equity securities, including Pink Sheets securities, that are sold
for a price greater than $200 per share.
The Pink Sheets Letter also recommended that the NASD prepare a
Notice to Members to remind broker-dealers about their obligation not
to participate in unlawful securities distributions. Further, the Pink
Sheets Letter recommended that NASDR review this issue with a view to
proposing rules that would preclude the participation of broker-dealers
in unlawful distributions of securities by their customers. In
addition, the Pink Sheets Letter advocated extending trade halt
authority under NASD Rule 6545 to all OTC equity securities, rather
than limiting it to OTCBB-eligible securities, and to extend the
authority to situations where fraudulent or manipulative acts are
strongly suspected, rather than relying on actions by other markets.
Further, the Pink Sheets Letter suggested limiting such trade halt
authority to four days so that ``piggyback'' eligibility under Rule
15c2-11 under the Act \12\ is not affected. Finally, the Pink Sheets
Letter recommended that the NASD's authority to cancel clearly
erroneous trades pursuant to NASD Rule 11890 should extend until the
settlement date for the transactions in question.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\12\ 17 CFR 240.15c2-11.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
In Amendment No. 2, the NASD noted that because the recommendations
in the Pink Sheets Letter are outside the scope of the proposed rule
change, it is not specifically responding to those recommendations in
the context of the proposed rule change. The NASD, however, indicated
that it will review and analyze the recommendations set forth in the
Pink Sheets Letter in the same manner in which it would consider any
requests for rulemaking, and, based on such review and analysis, will
determine whether further action on those recommendations is
appropriate.\13\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\13\ The Commission notes that the NASD did not respond to the
STANY Letter because it was submitted after the NASD had filed
Amendment No. 2. As noted above, the STANY Letter adopted the views
of the Pink Sheets Letter with respect to the dissemination of trade
and volume data for OTC equity securities.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
IV. Discussion and Commission Findings
The Commission finds that the proposed rule change, as amended, is
consistent with the provisions of Section 15A(b)(6) of the Act,\14\
which requires, among other things, that NASD rules must be designed to
prevent fraudulent and manipulative acts and practices, to promote just
and equitable principles of trade, and, in general, to protect
investors and the public interest.\15\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\14\ 15 U.S.C. 78o-3(b)(6).
\15\ In approving this proposed rule change, as amended, the
Commission notes that it has considered the proposed rule's impact
on efficiency, competition, and capital formation. See 15 U.S.C.
78c(f).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Under the proposal, the NASD will assume direct authority for OTC
equity operations that it previously had delegated to Nasdaq. The NASD
represents that, pursuant to a contractual arrangement with Nasdaq,
Nasdaq will continue to provide certain operational systems and
support, including the OTCBB quotation and trade reporting platform and
certain other services that Nasdaq currently provides with respect to
OTC equity operations. In addition, the NASD proposes to delegate to
NASDR the authority to develop and adopt rule changes to establish
trading practices with respect to OTC equity securities. The Commission
believes that the proposal by the NASD to assume direct responsibility
for OTC equity operations, including operation of the OTCBB, and to
delegate to NASDR the authority to develop and adopt rule changes to
establish trading practices with respect to OTC equity securities is
consistent with the Act. In the Commission's view, since the NASD is
the self-regulatory organization with authority over and responsibility
for the oversight of the OTC equity market, it is reasonable for the
NASD to revise its Delegation Plan to assume direct authority for OTC
equity operations and to delegate to NASDR rulemaking authority for
trading practices involving OTC equity securities.
In addition, the proposal would amend NASD Rule 11890 to grant the
NASD direct authority to determine, on its own motion, whether certain
transactions in OTC equity securities should be modified or nullified
in the event of a disruption or malfunction of any NASD quotation,
communication, or trade reporting system or in the event of
extraordinary market conditions in which nullification or modification
of transactions may be necessary for the maintenance of a fair and
orderly market or the protection of investors and the public interest.
The proposal also provides a process by which a determination under
NASD Rule 11890 could be appealed to the Uniform Practice Code
(``UPC'') Committee, unless the Executive Vice President who makes the
initial determination specifies at that time that the number of
affected transactions is such that immediate finality is necessary to
maintain a fair and orderly market and to protect investors and the
public interest. The Commission believes that the assumption of direct
authority by the NASD to nullify or modify the terms of trades in OTC
equity securities under certain conditions is appropriate and should
help clarify for OTC equity market participants the NASD's authority to
nullify or modify the terms of clearly erroneous transactions in OTC
equity securities.
The proposal would amend certain other rules, including NASD Rule
6620(f) and NASD Rule 7010(p)(3), to reflect the transfer of authority
from Nasdaq to the NASD with respect to the reporting of trades
cancelled pursuant to NASD Rule 11890 and the authority to set fees for
historical research reports for OTCBB-eligible securities,
respectively. The Commission believes that these changes are
appropriate to conform the applicable rule text to reflect the
assumption of direct responsibility for OTC equity securities by the
NASD.
The Commission finds good cause for approving Amendment Nos. 2, 3,
and 4 to the proposed rule change prior to the thirtieth day after the
date of the publication of notice thereof in the Federal Register. The
Commission notes that Amendment No. 2 is a non-substantive amendment to
revise the effective date of the proposed rule change; to reflect
changes to NASD Rule 11890 and IM-11890-2 that were approved by the
Commission shortly before publication of the Notice; and to clarify the
timeframe for NASD or Nasdaq officials to act on their own motion to
nullify or modify the terms of a trade under NASD Rule 11890. Further,
Amendment No. 3 is a non-substantive amendment to revise Exhibit 4
contained in Amendment No. 2 to reflect the changes to the text of NASD
Rule 11890 submitted in
[[Page 57348]]
Amendment No. 2, and Amendment No. 4 is a non-substantive amendment to
IM-11890-2. The Commission therefore believes that it is appropriate to
accelerate approval of Amendment Nos. 2, 3, and 4 so that the proposed
rule change, as amended, may be implemented in full without delay.
V. Solicitation of Comments
Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views, and
arguments concerning the foregoing, including whether Amendment Nos. 2,
3, and 4 to the proposed rule change, as amended, are consistent with
the Act. Comments may be submitted by any of the following methods:
Electronic Comments
Use the Commission's Internet comment form (https://
www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml); or
Send an e-mail to rule-comments@sec.gov. Please include
File Number SR-NASD-2005-089 on the subject line.
Paper Comments
Send paper comments in triplicate to Jonathan G. Katz,
Secretary, Securities and Exchange Commission, Station Place, 100 F
Street, NE., Washington, DC 20549-9303.
All submissions should refer to File Number SR-NASD-2005-089. This
file number should be included on the subject line if e-mail is used.
To help the Commission process and review your comments more
efficiently, please use only one method. The Commission will post all
comments on the Commission's Internet Web site (https://www.sec.gov/
rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the submission, all subsequent amendments,
all written statements with respect to the proposed rule change that
are filed with the Commission, and all written communications relating
to the proposed rule change between the Commission and any person,
other than those that may be withheld from the public in accordance
with the provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be available for inspection
and copying in the Commission's Public Reference Room. Copies of such
filing also will be available for inspection and copying at the
principal office of the Nasdaq. All comments received will be posted
without change; the Commission does not edit personal identifying
information from submissions. You should submit only information that
you wish to make available publicly. All submissions should refer to
File Number SR-NASD-2005-089 and should be submitted on or before
October 21, 2005.
VI. Conclusion
It is therefore ordered, pursuant to Section 19(b)(2) of the
Act,\16\ that the proposed rule change (SR-NASD-2005-089), as amended,
be, and it hereby is, approved, and Amendment Nos. 2, 3, and 4 are
hereby approved on an accelerated basis.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\16\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(2).
For the Commission, by the Division of Market Regulation,
pursuant to delegated authority.\17\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\17\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Jonathan G. Katz,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. E5-5334 Filed 9-29-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8010-01-P